Relative Intelligence · Entertainment

How Roblox (RBLX) compares with the whole market and its popular alternatives
Built by QuantCommons' quantitative engine, this page is about relative opportunity, not data on RBLX alone. It places RBLX (Roblox Corporation) against 16 popular alternatives, its neighboring categories and the entire market of over 10,000 U.S.-listed stocks and ETFs, and surfaces what has done better on consistent outperformance, return for the risk taken, behavior in real market crashes and diversification. The result is a clearer view of where RBLX stands in the market, and of the alternatives worth a closer look.
Period covered: RBLX's full trading record, from March 2021 through September 2026. The crash tests reach back to 2000 using older funds and the S&P 500. All returns include reinvested dividends. Data as of October 20, 2026.
Data as of October 20, 2026. Full tables and charts read best on a larger screen.
On this page12 sections
Key findings
- Right nowOver the past 6 months, RBLX fell 15.3% while the S&P 500 rose 9.1%. The slide is RBLX's own: it is 63.0% below its high, against 1.3% for the S&P 500. At a glance ↓
- Stock or market?The weakness is RBLX's own: it fell 1.7% over the past 3 months while the technology sector ETF XLK (State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF) rose 5.7%. The S&P 500 rose 3.9%. Its entertainment peers did not move as one over the past 3 months: U (Unity Software) rose 34.7%, while BILI (Bilibili) fell 24.4%.
- Past 1 to 3 yearsRBLX has gone against the market, falling 61.2% over the past year while the S&P 500 rose 15.8%. The same gap shows up over 3 years (64.8% against 89.3%). That said, the last two calendar years both went the same way: RBLX rose 40.0% in 2025, while the S&P 500 rose 15.8%. By year ↓
- Long termRBLX turned $10,000 into $6,660 over the past 5 years, against $18,200 in the S&P 500. RBLX's 5-year loss of 33.4% puts it behind 76% of the stocks worth at least $300 million with that much history. The S&P 500 returned 81.7%. Growth of $10,000 ↓
- In a crashThe 2022 bear market took 75.6% off RBLX, against 24.5% for the S&P 500. That was more than MSFT (Microsoft, 31.0%) but less than U (Unity Software, 76.6%). Crash tests ↓
- DiversificationOver 5 years RBLX took more of the market's losses than of its gains: in the S&P 500's rising months it gained 24% as much as the index, and in falling months it lost 1.2 times as much, with a beta of 1.45. Market capture ↓
- Better options
- Popular alternatives
- NVDA (NVIDIA), GOOG (Alphabet) and META (Meta Platforms) earned more than RBLX with less volatility over the past 5 years. NVDA returned 58.0% a year at 51.9% volatility, against a loss of 7.8% a year at 71.1%.
- Nearby categories and themes
- AMZN (Amazon.com, e-commerce) and T (AT&T, integrated telecommunications) earned more than RBLX with less volatility over the past 5 years. AMZN returned 9.0% a year at 36.6% volatility, against a loss of 7.8% a year at 71.1%.
- Whole market
- 2,850 of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than RBLX with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them NVDA (NVIDIA), AAPL (Apple) and GOOG (Alphabet).
How much would $10,000 in RBLX have grown?
This chart tracks a hypothetical $10,000 investment in RBLX over the past 5 years, with dividends reinvested, alongside the same amount in the S&P 500, investments that ended ahead of RBLX over the same span and RBLX's popular alternatives, among those that traded for the entire period. It shows not only where each investment ended up but also how smooth or uneven the path was.
Note: RBLX began trading on March 10, 2021, so the chart cannot reach back to the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or six other sell-offs. It covers the most recent 5 years of RBLX's record, starting at the end of September 2021.
- $10,000 invested in RBLX at the end of September 2021 would have grown to $5,608 by September 2026, less than the $19,000 it would have become in SPY, an S&P 500 fund.
- All eight other investments on the chart ended ahead of RBLX, and NVDA finished highest, at $110,811.
From the end of September 2021 to the end of September 2026. The scale is logarithmic, so equal steps up the chart are equal percentage gains. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 3,174 of the 3,628 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of RBLX; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- NVDA$110,811+1,008% total · +61.8% a year
- APP$40,130+301% total · +32.0% a year
- GOOG$25,811+158% total · +20.9% a year
- META$21,571+116% total · +16.6% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$19,000+90.0% total · +13.7% a year
- MSFT$18,958+89.6% total · +13.6% a year
- NTES$15,824+58.2% total · +9.6% a year
- TTWO$13,468+34.7% total · +6.1% a year
- SONY$10,955+9.5% total · +1.8% a year
- RBLX$5,608−43.9% total · −10.9% a year
RBLX at a glance
This section summarizes the key facts about the stock, its returns over periods from one to ten years and the risk it has carried, with dividends reinvested throughout. These figures serve as the baseline for every comparison that follows.
Note: RBLX began trading on March 10, 2021, so every figure here, including its worst decline, covers only the time since then. None of them reflect the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or six other sell-offs.
- RBLX is still 63.0% below its all-time high.
- RBLX's deepest decline since it began trading in 2021 was 82.8%, from November 2021 to May 2022. It took about three years from the low to climb back to its old high.
- Over four full calendar years, RBLX's best was 2023, when it returned 60.6%, and its worst was 2022, when it lost 72.4%. It lost money in one of those years.
The company
- Market value
- $37B
- Industry
- Electronic Gaming & Multimedia
- Price history from
- March 2021
Returns
- Past 1 year
- −61.2%total return
- Past 3 years
- +64.8%+18.1% a year
- Past 5 years
- −33.4%−7.8% a year
- Best calendar year
- +60.6%2023
- Worst calendar year
- −72.4%2022
- Losing years
- 1 of 4full calendar years
Risk
- Volatility
- 71.1%typical yearly swing, 5 years
- Sharpe ratio
- 0.24return per unit of risk, 5 years
- Worst decline ever
- −82.8%Nov 2021 to May 2022
- From its all-time high
- −63.0%below the peak
RBLX against the whole market
Where RBLX ranks among every stock and fund, and what across the market has done better.
How does RBLX rank among all stocks?
This section ranks RBLX on return, volatility, risk-adjusted return and worst decline against every stock worth at least $300 million with enough history. Where the comparisons with its popular alternatives show how RBLX stacks up against its peers, these rankings show where it stands in the market as a whole.
- RBLX's 1-year return ranks in the bottom 3% of the 3,287 stocks worth at least $300 million with 1 year of history.
Ranked against U.S.-listed stocks worth at least $300M that have enough history for each measure, so the count changes from row to row; smaller stocks are left out. Lower volatility and smaller declines rank higher.
| Measure | RBLX | Rank | Standing |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | −61.2% | 3,197 of 3,287 | bottom 4% |
| 3-year return | +64.8% | 1,332 of 3,017 | top 44% |
| 5-year return | −33.4% | 2,209 of 2,893 | bottom 25% |
| Volatility, 5 years | 71.1% | 2,524 of 2,893 | bottom 14% |
| Sharpe ratio, 5 years | 0.24 | 1,730 of 2,893 | bottom 41% |
What has beaten RBLX on both return and risk?
Each dot is an investment, placed by how much it earned a year over the past 5 years (higher is better) and how much its price swung, its volatility (further left is calmer). RBLX sits where the dashed lines cross. Anything in the green box above and to the left earned more than RBLX with smaller swings, a better trade-off over this period on both counts. Past results are no promise, but a name in the box is worth a closer look.
- 1,854 stocks and 996 ETFs worth at least $500 million sit in the green region: each earned more than RBLX over the past 5 years with smaller price swings. That is 78% of the 3,633 screened.
- Among those with at least half RBLX's swings, CLS has the best return for its risk: 101% a year at 59.7% volatility, 16% less than RBLX's 71.1%, and a Sharpe ratio (return above cash per unit of volatility) of 1.47 against 0.24 for RBLX.
- Among RBLX's popular alternatives, NVDA, GOOG and MSFT are in the region. NVDA earned 58.0% a year against a loss of 7.8% a year for RBLX, at 51.9% volatility, 27% less than RBLX's 71.1%.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested, and volatility the annualized swing in daily prices, both over 5 years. Labeled dots are the strongest picks from the table below and the names called out above, colored by how close they sit to RBLX; faint dots are 94 more of the 2,850 in the green region (the strongest, one per fund family). 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million were screened. Hover over a dot for its figures.
- Popular alternatives
- Same and neighboring categories, and shared themes
- The whole market
- Others in the green region
Is there a better investment than RBLX?
Investments that beat RBLX over the past 5 years on return, volatility, drawdowns, consistency, crash losses or fees, from its popular alternatives out to the whole market.
- Among RBLX's popular alternatives, NVDA, GOOG and META earned more than RBLX with less volatility over the past 5 years. NVDA returned 58.0% a year at 51.9% volatility, against a loss of 7.8% a year at 71.1%.
- Looking beyond its popular alternatives, AMZN (e-commerce) and T (integrated telecommunications) earned more than RBLX with less volatility over the past 5 years. AMZN returned 9.0% a year at 36.6% volatility, against a loss of 7.8% a year at 71.1%.
- Across the whole market, 2,850 of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than RBLX with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them NVDA, AAPL and GOOG.
How this works
The table below lists investments that beat RBLX over the past 5 years on at least one of these measures: a higher annual return with lower volatility, a higher annual return at similar volatility, a similar return with lower volatility, a higher Sharpe ratio with a smaller worst decline, a higher total return in most periods from 3 months to 10 years, or smaller losses in recent market crashes. It checks RBLX's popular alternatives first, then the rest of its own and neighboring categories, then every stock and fund worth at least $500 million, and shows the strongest few in each group. The full list of those with a higher return and lower volatility than RBLX follows the table.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested. Annual return, volatility and the Sharpe ratio cover 5 years; the worst decline covers the past 10 years. Green marks a better figure than RBLX's. "On the frontier" means no other option shown or tested earned more with less volatility. Funds that hold the same thing are shown once. Beyond the popular alternatives, nothing with more than 1.5× RBLX's volatility counts as better.
These figures cover the past 5 years. Green marks a better figure than RBLX's.
| Investment | Why it is better | Past 5 years | Downside | Long run | Fit | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Annual return?higher is better | Volatility?lower is calmer | Sharpe?return per unit of risk | Worst decline?past 10 years | 5Y returntotal | Corr. with RBLX?lower diversifies more | Expenseper year | |||
| −7.8% | 71.1% | 0.24 | −82.8% | −33.4% | 1.00 | — | |||
| +12.7% | 17.1% | 0.79 | −33.7% | +81.7% | 0.35 | 0.09% | |||
| Popular alternativesbest 6 shownThe investments people most often weigh against RBLX. 9 of 15 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +58.0% | 51.9% | 1.14 | −66.3% | +884% | 0.43 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +19.0% | 32.0% | 0.71 | −44.6% | +138% | 0.22 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +15.5% | 45.4% | 0.55 | −76.7% | +106% | 0.19 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +12.5% | 28.2% | 0.56 | −37.1% | +80.3% | 0.22 | — | ||
| Higher return, similar volatility | +23.9% | 78.1% | 0.66 | −91.9% | +192% | 0.25 | — | ||
GRVYGravity Co., Ltd. · Electronic Gaming & Multimedia | Similar return, lower volatility | −8.2% | 41.9% | 0.01 | −83.2% | −34.9% | 0.12 | — | |
| Same and neighboring categories, and shared themesbest 6 shownEverything else in Entertainment and the categories next to it (Internet Services, Media, Telecommunications, E-Commerce), plus RBLX's specific themes. 51 of 72 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +9.0% | 36.6% | 0.42 | −56.1% | +53.8% | 0.34 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +9.8% | 25.2% | 0.50 | −39.4% | +59.7% | -0.11 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +11.7% | 32.9% | 0.50 | −53.6% | +74.2% | 0.20 | — | ||
TKOTKO Group Holdings, Inc. · Entertainment | Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +26.3% | 32.7% | 0.88 | −69.1% | +221% | 0.04 | — | |
ZETAZeta Global Holdings Corp. · Software · Digital Advertising theme | Higher return, similar volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +33.2% | 70.5% | 0.77 | −70.0% | +320% | 0.07 | — | |
| Similar return, lower volatility | −8.2% | 51.3% | 0.08 | −80.1% | −34.8% | -0.12 | — | ||
| The whole marketbest 8 shownEvery other stock and fund worth at least $500 million. 2,965 of 3,549 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| On the frontierHigher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +17.3% | 18.2% | 0.97 | −40.0% | +122% | 0.03 | — | ||
| On the frontierHigher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +51.8% | 37.5% | 1.31 | −71.7% | +705% | -0.12 | — | ||
| On the frontierHigher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +42.1% | 24.7% | 1.55 | −46.1% | +479% | 0.03 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +18.5% | 28.0% | 0.75 | −38.5% | +133% | 0.31 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +11.5% | 17.5% | 0.71 | −35.0% | +72.6% | 0.37 | 0.03% | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +12.8% | 16.9% | 0.80 | −34.0% | +82.3% | 0.35 | 0.03% | ||
CORTCorcept Therapeutics Incorporated · Biotechnology | Higher return, similar volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +43.0% | 75.9% | 0.81 | −71.9% | +498% | 0.05 | — | |
LNCLincoln National Corporation · Life Insurance | Similar return, lower volatilityHigher return in most periods | −7.4% | 42.7% | 0.04 | −79.2% | −32.1% | 0.08 | — | |
What these numbers mean for RBLX
- Annual return
- RBLX lost 7.8% a year over the past 5 years with dividends reinvested, against 12.7% a year for the S&P 500. At that pace, $10,000 became about $6,660. Annual return is the steady yearly rate that would produce the same total result, so investments held over the same span compare fairly. Guide: What is performance and return? →
- Volatility
- RBLX's volatility over the past 5 years was 71.1%, 4.1 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, RBLX's return lands within 71.1% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump. Guide: Understanding and measuring risk (volatility) →
- Sharpe ratio
- RBLX's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.24, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so RBLX earned less for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings. Guide: Balancing reward with risk (Sharpe ratio) →
- Worst decline
- RBLX's worst fall from a peak to a low over the past 10 years was 82.8%, against 33.7% for the S&P 500. Losses and gains are not symmetric: climbing back from a 82.8% fall takes a 481% gain. Guide: Market crash risk and tail risk →
- Correlation
- Over the past 5 years, RBLX's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.35 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They are only loosely linked, which makes it a real diversifier next to an index fund. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against RBLX instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a RBLX holding. Guide: Correlation and diversification →
Show all 2,850 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that earned more than RBLX with less volatility
Out of 3,633 tested over 5 years. The strongest 100 are listed, best first, with funds that hold the same thing listed once.
| # | Investment | Found in | Annual return | Volatility | Sharpe | Worst decline | 5Y return | Corr. with RBLX | Expense |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Whole market | +17.3% | 18.2% | 0.97 | −40.0% | +122% | 0.03 | — | |
| 2 | Whole market | +51.8% | 37.5% | 1.31 | −71.7% | +705% | -0.12 | — | |
| 3 | Whole market | +42.1% | 24.7% | 1.55 | −46.1% | +479% | 0.03 | — | |
| 4 | Whole market | +18.5% | 28.0% | 0.75 | −38.5% | +133% | 0.31 | — | |
| 5 | Whole market | +23.5% | 18.8% | 1.22 | −75.2% | +187% | 0.03 | — | |
| 6 | Whole market | +31.5% | 38.5% | 0.91 | −56.6% | +293% | 0.36 | — | |
| 7 | Whole market | +40.7% | 32.8% | 1.21 | −34.5% | +451% | -0.13 | — | |
| 8 | Whole market | +11.5% | 17.5% | 0.71 | −35.0% | +72.6% | 0.37 | 0.03% | |
| 9 | Whole market | +68.1% | 57.1% | 1.20 | −57.6% | +1,244% | 0.11 | — | |
| 10 | Whole market | +12.8% | 16.9% | 0.80 | −34.0% | +82.3% | 0.35 | 0.03% | |
| 11 | Whole market | +20.8% | 22.6% | 0.96 | −25.7% | +158% | 0.05 | — | |
| 12 | Whole market | +27.1% | 26.5% | 1.04 | −61.0% | +232% | -0.29 | — | |
| 13 | Whole market | +35.7% | 57.6% | 0.82 | −65.5% | +359% | 0.28 | — | |
| 14 | Whole market | +17.3% | 24.3% | 0.78 | −43.6% | +122% | 0.25 | — | |
| 15 | Whole market | +26.1% | 23.4% | 1.11 | −45.1% | +218% | -0.01 | — | |
| 16 | Whole market | +5.3% | 60.0% | 0.39 | −73.6% | +29.5% | 0.44 | — | |
| 17 | Whole market | +33.1% | 25.9% | 1.24 | −62.3% | +318% | -0.13 | — | |
| 18 | Whole market | +12.7% | 17.9% | 0.76 | −27.4% | +82.1% | -0.10 | — | |
| 19 | Whole market | +12.8% | 22.9% | 0.64 | −36.4% | +82.5% | 0.08 | — | |
| 20 | DXJWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund · International Equity | Whole market | +26.6% | 19.1% | 1.34 | −39.1% | +225% | -0.01 | 0.48% |
| 21 | LVHIFranklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +17.0% | 11.1% | 1.48 | −32.4% | +119% | -0.08 | 0.40% |
| 22 | Whole market | +14.7% | 16.8% | 0.91 | −37.0% | +98.2% | -0.27 | — | |
| 23 | Whole market | +31.1% | 31.9% | 1.01 | −43.4% | +288% | 0.21 | — | |
| 24 | Whole market | +55.2% | 54.4% | 1.08 | −59.6% | +800% | 0.01 | — | |
| 25 | Whole market | +17.4% | 22.9% | 0.82 | −31.4% | +123% | 0.31 | — | |
| 26 | Whole market | +8.2% | 16.4% | 0.57 | −36.0% | +48.6% | 0.16 | 0.05% | |
| 27 | Whole market | +17.4% | 43.4% | 0.59 | −56.9% | +123% | 0.26 | — | |
| 28 | Whole market | +14.5% | 23.0% | 0.71 | −35.1% | +97.2% | 0.48 | 0.18% | |
| 29 | Whole market | +33.2% | 29.4% | 1.13 | −54.9% | +319% | -0.12 | — | |
| 30 | Whole market | +21.0% | 23.4% | 0.94 | −42.9% | +159% | -0.18 | — | |
| 31 | Whole market | +37.4% | 49.9% | 0.89 | −56.4% | +390% | 0.37 | — | |
| 32 | Whole market | +16.8% | 26.1% | 0.73 | −42.0% | +118% | 0.07 | — | |
| 33 | Whole market | +50.3% | 37.5% | 1.28 | −75.3% | +667% | -0.16 | — | |
| 34 | Whole market | +49.0% | 49.0% | 1.06 | −52.2% | +634% | 0.36 | — | |
| 35 | Whole market | +21.0% | 24.8% | 0.90 | −67.2% | +159% | -0.33 | — | |
| 36 | Whole market | +38.7% | 25.0% | 1.44 | −38.1% | +413% | -0.01 | — | |
| 37 | Whole market | +17.1% | 20.7% | 0.87 | −26.8% | +121% | -0.09 | — | |
| 38 | INSWInternational Seaways, Inc. · Oil & Gas | Whole market | +56.5% | 40.5% | 1.31 | −57.4% | +839% | -0.26 | — |
| 39 | Whole market | +31.9% | 43.4% | 0.86 | −48.0% | +299% | 0.15 | — | |
| 40 | Whole market | +33.8% | 32.2% | 1.07 | −37.5% | +329% | 0.46 | — | |
| 41 | Whole market | +12.1% | 13.7% | 0.90 | −36.8% | +76.6% | 0.12 | 0.03% | |
| 42 | Whole market | +12.4% | 55.6% | 0.49 | −70.8% | +79.8% | 0.09 | — | |
| 43 | Whole market | +57.4% | 48.7% | 1.18 | −57.0% | +866% | 0.21 | — | |
| 44 | Whole market | +25.8% | 47.4% | 0.72 | −55.1% | +215% | 0.30 | — | |
| 45 | Whole market | +26.0% | 23.8% | 1.09 | −63.3% | +217% | 0.03 | — | |
| 46 | Whole market | +18.6% | 24.3% | 0.83 | −52.0% | +135% | -0.09 | — | |
| 47 | Whole market | +38.7% | 46.7% | 0.94 | −46.3% | +413% | 0.36 | — | |
| 48 | Whole market | +31.7% | 33.9% | 0.99 | −73.8% | +295% | -0.03 | — | |
| 49 | Whole market | +19.6% | 24.9% | 0.85 | −24.9% | +145% | -0.05 | — | |
| 50 | Whole market | +38.7% | 33.3% | 1.16 | −69.6% | +413% | -0.14 | — | |
| 51 | Whole market | +22.8% | 24.9% | 0.95 | −30.5% | +180% | 0.10 | — | |
| 52 | Whole market | +19.6% | 28.6% | 0.77 | −48.8% | +145% | 0.22 | — | |
| 53 | Whole market | +44.2% | 36.9% | 1.18 | −71.9% | +524% | -0.16 | — | |
| 54 | Whole market | +9.3% | 16.9% | 0.61 | −35.8% | +55.9% | 0.16 | 0.03% | |
| 55 | Whole market | +16.0% | 28.8% | 0.66 | −51.3% | +110% | 0.15 | — | |
| 56 | Whole market | +15.8% | 20.0% | 0.84 | −42.0% | +109% | 0.09 | — | |
| 57 | Whole market | +35.4% | 35.4% | 1.04 | −55.1% | +355% | 0.34 | — | |
| 58 | Whole market | +53.7% | 53.5% | 1.07 | −70.5% | +759% | 0.18 | — | |
| 59 | Whole market | +26.3% | 52.7% | 0.71 | −67.7% | +221% | 0.18 | — | |
| 60 | Whole market | +33.6% | 30.6% | 1.10 | −45.7% | +326% | -0.10 | — | |
| 61 | Whole market | +19.9% | 22.3% | 0.93 | −42.5% | +147% | 0.04 | — | |
| 62 | Whole market | +32.0% | 40.7% | 0.89 | −55.3% | +301% | -0.06 | — | |
| 63 | Whole market | +17.7% | 18.9% | 0.96 | −26.4% | +126% | 0.01 | 0.40% | |
| 64 | Whole market | +29.5% | 65.2% | 0.72 | −61.9% | +264% | 0.34 | — | |
| 65 | Whole market | +16.6% | 30.5% | 0.66 | −41.1% | +116% | 0.04 | — | |
| 66 | Whole market | +33.2% | 32.9% | 1.04 | −64.2% | +319% | -0.17 | — | |
| 67 | Whole market | +18.4% | 26.0% | 0.78 | −35.1% | +133% | 0.45 | 0.09% | |
| 68 | Whole market | +25.4% | 30.4% | 0.90 | −59.8% | +210% | 0.04 | — | |
| 69 | Whole market | +13.1% | 29.5% | 0.57 | −64.5% | +85.0% | 0.16 | — | |
| 70 | Whole market | +11.5% | 30.0% | 0.52 | −52.5% | +72.6% | 0.19 | — | |
| 71 | Whole market | +33.7% | 29.4% | 1.14 | −47.6% | +327% | -0.15 | — | |
| 72 | Whole market | +27.4% | 28.8% | 0.99 | −54.7% | +235% | 0.35 | — | |
| 73 | Whole market | +16.6% | 31.4% | 0.65 | −44.3% | +115% | -0.07 | — | |
| 74 | Whole market | +19.5% | 34.1% | 0.69 | −33.6% | +144% | 0.18 | — | |
| 75 | Whole market | +48.8% | 43.0% | 1.15 | −52.5% | +631% | 0.12 | — | |
| 76 | Whole market | +15.1% | 29.4% | 0.63 | −56.5% | +102% | 0.31 | — | |
| 77 | Whole market | +18.7% | 22.0% | 0.90 | −56.1% | +136% | -0.17 | — | |
| 78 | Whole market | +13.5% | 29.3% | 0.58 | −49.6% | +88.5% | 0.10 | — | |
| 79 | Whole market | +15.7% | 20.4% | 0.82 | −42.6% | +107% | -0.16 | — | |
| 80 | Whole market | +39.3% | 37.2% | 1.08 | −45.5% | +425% | 0.24 | — | |
| 81 | Whole market | +9.9% | 33.7% | 0.45 | −33.4% | +60.5% | 0.15 | — | |
| 82 | Whole market | +17.8% | 21.4% | 0.88 | −53.7% | +126% | -0.07 | — | |
| 83 | Whole market | +33.1% | 32.5% | 1.05 | −73.5% | +318% | -0.29 | — | |
| 84 | Whole market | +20.4% | 32.1% | 0.74 | −44.5% | +153% | 0.25 | — | |
| 85 | Whole market | +26.5% | 32.5% | 0.89 | −77.5% | +224% | -0.19 | — | |
| 86 | Whole market | +22.7% | 24.4% | 0.97 | −50.5% | +179% | 0.18 | — | |
| 87 | Whole market | +24.6% | 24.0% | 1.04 | −68.1% | +200% | -0.02 | — | |
| 88 | Whole market | +19.2% | 21.6% | 0.93 | −47.3% | +141% | 0.18 | — | |
| 89 | Whole market | +6.8% | 17.6% | 0.47 | −39.4% | +39.1% | 0.34 | 0.03% | |
| 90 | Whole market | +14.4% | 29.9% | 0.60 | −37.9% | +96.1% | 0.18 | — | |
| 91 | Whole market | +10.4% | 14.1% | 0.78 | −31.7% | +64.0% | 0.25 | 0.04% | |
| 92 | Whole market | +26.3% | 33.8% | 0.86 | −62.1% | +221% | 0.06 | — | |
| 93 | Whole market | +22.4% | 22.3% | 1.02 | −46.3% | +174% | -0.11 | — | |
| 94 | Whole market | +22.7% | 27.7% | 0.88 | −40.5% | +178% | 0.30 | — | |
| 95 | Whole market | +22.0% | 28.6% | 0.84 | −61.3% | +170% | 0.09 | — | |
| 96 | Whole market | +57.3% | 64.5% | 1.03 | −66.9% | +863% | 0.25 | — | |
| 97 | Whole market | +23.0% | 25.6% | 0.94 | −61.4% | +181% | -0.17 | — | |
| 98 | Whole market | +29.5% | 38.4% | 0.87 | −54.2% | +264% | 0.11 | — | |
| 99 | Whole market | +24.7% | 31.1% | 0.87 | −74.4% | +201% | 0.00 | — | |
| 100 | Whole market | +34.3% | 32.0% | 1.09 | −77.1% | +337% | -0.12 | — |
RBLX against its popular alternatives
The investments people most often weigh against RBLX, compared period by period and year by year.
How do RBLX's risk and return compare with its alternatives?
This map plots each investment's annual return over the past 5 years against its volatility, the size of its typical price swings. Investments toward the upper left earned more for a smoother ride, and those toward the lower right earned less for a rougher one. The dashed lines cross at RBLX, which divides the map into what did better or worse on each measure.
- Seven of the 15 popular alternatives, led by NVDA, GOOG and META, were both more rewarding and calmer than RBLX over the past 5 years, earning a higher annual return with lower volatility.
- Over the past 5 years, RBLX returned -7.8% a year, less than the S&P 500's 12.7%, with higher volatility (71.1% against 17.1%).
Green points earned more than RBLX with less volatility; red points earned less with more. Hover over a point for its figures. Total returns with dividends reinvested, annualized.
All figures
| Investment | Annual return | Volatility |
|---|---|---|
| NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | +58.0% | 51.9% |
| APP AppLovin Corporation | +23.9% | 78.1% |
| GOOG Alphabet Inc. | +19.0% | 32.0% |
| META Meta Platforms, Inc. | +15.5% | 45.4% |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | +12.7% | 17.1% |
| MSFT Microsoft Corporation | +12.5% | 28.2% |
| NTES NetEase, Inc. | +6.6% | 41.9% |
| TTWO Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. | +3.6% | 32.9% |
| SONY Sony Group Corporation | +2.9% | 29.2% |
| RBLX This pageRoblox Corporation | −7.8% | 71.1% |
| GRVY Gravity Co., Ltd. | −8.2% | 41.9% |
| SOHU Sohu.com Limited | −11.1% | 42.3% |
| U Unity Software Inc. | −22.4% | 77.5% |
| PLAY Dave & Buster's Entertainment, Inc. | −26.3% | 61.2% |
| BILI Bilibili Inc. | −29.9% | 77.4% |
| PLTK Playtika Holding Corp. | −38.9% | 53.1% |
| SNAP Snap Inc. | −39.0% | 76.2% |
Has RBLX consistently beaten its popular alternatives?
This section compares RBLX with the investments people most often weigh against it, checking each one over seven periods from one month to five years. Counting how often an alternative earned more than RBLX helps separate lasting outperformance from a single strong stretch.
- Three of the 16 popular alternatives, NVDA, META and GOOG, outperformed RBLX in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 2 long-term timeframes.
- NVDA and META outperformed RBLX in every long-term period and in all but one short-term period, the most consistent record in the group.
- NVDA, GOOG and MSFT earned more for the risk they took than RBLX (a higher Sharpe ratio) and fell less in their worst decline of the past 10 years.
A green cell means the alternative earned more than RBLX over that period. "Qualified" marks those that did so in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 2 long-term periods.
| Investment | Periods outperformed | Short term | Long term | Risk · 5 years | Fund | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1M | 3M | 6M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | Volatilitylower is calmer | Sharpehigher is better | Worst declinepast 10 years | Expense | Assets | Overlapsame sectors | ||
| RBLX Roblox Corporation (this page) | — | +2.1% | −1.7% | −15.3% | −35.3% | −61.2% | +64.8% | −33.4% | 71.1% | 0.24 | −82.8% | — | $37B | — |
| NVDA QualifiedNVIDIA Corporation | 4/5 short2/2 longAll-weather | −4.8% | +6.6% | +7.4% | +14.9% | +18.8% | +425% | +884% | 51.9% | 1.14 | −66.3% | — | $5.2T | — |
| META QualifiedMeta Platforms, Inc. | 4/5 short2/2 longAll-weather | −6.3% | +7.6% | +3.7% | +7.0% | −4.9% | +127% | +106% | 45.4% | 0.55 | −76.7% | — | $1.8T | — |
| GOOG QualifiedAlphabet Inc. | 3/5 short2/2 long | −4.1% | −4.2% | +0.4% | +6.9% | +31.2% | +148% | +138% | 32.0% | 0.71 | −44.6% | — | $4.1T | — |
| APP Software - ApplicationAppLovin Corporation | 1/5 short2/2 long | −17.5% | −35.8% | −44.5% | −55.9% | −51.9% | +625% | +192% | 78.1% | 0.66 | −91.9% | — | $92B | — |
| MSFT Software - InfrastructureMicrosoft Corporation | 5/5 short1/2 long | +6.0% | +32.5% | +27.7% | +13.2% | +3.8% | +66.6% | +80.3% | 28.2% | 0.56 | −37.1% | — | $3.9T | — |
| SONY Consumer ElectronicsSony Group Corporation | 5/5 short1/2 long | +7.3% | +19.7% | +18.1% | −2.2% | −13.2% | +54.0% | +15.4% | 29.2% | 0.24 | −50.6% | — | $150B | — |
| NTES Electronic Gaming & MultimediaNetEase, Inc. | 4/5 short1/2 long | +6.5% | −6.4% | +6.9% | −13.5% | −16.2% | +34.1% | +37.6% | 41.9% | 0.36 | −57.4% | — | $80B | — |
| TTWO Electronic Gaming & MultimediaTake-Two Interactive Software, Inc. | 3/5 short1/2 long | −1.5% | −13.5% | −4.7% | −17.8% | −21.2% | +47.0% | +19.1% | 32.9% | 0.27 | −56.1% | — | $39B | — |
| SNAP Internet Content & InformationSnap Inc. | 5/5 short0/2 long | +11.9% | +39.9% | +6.3% | −21.5% | −17.5% | −32.4% | −91.6% | 76.2% | -0.26 | −95.3% | — | $11B | — |
| SG RestaurantsSweetgreen, Inc. | 5/5 short0/2 long | +42.6% | +60.5% | +53.1% | +54.0% | +43.6% | −2.3% | — | — | — | −91.1% | — | $1.3B | — |
| GRVY Electronic Gaming & MultimediaGravity Co., Ltd. | 4/5 short0/2 long | −3.9% | +8.0% | +2.9% | +14.1% | +15.2% | +2.8% | −34.9% | 41.9% | 0.01 | −83.2% | — | $465M | — |
| U Software - ApplicationUnity Software Inc. | 4/5 short0/2 long | −7.1% | +34.7% | +51.4% | −9.2% | +13.9% | +47.8% | −71.8% | 77.5% | 0.06 | −93.1% | — | $18B | — |
| SOHU Internet Content & InformationSohu.com Limited | 2/5 short0/2 long | −2.1% | −5.2% | −20.1% | −20.6% | −14.0% | +54.6% | −44.3% | 42.3% | -0.07 | −92.2% | — | $378M | — |
| PLAY LeisureDave & Buster's Entertainment, Inc. | 2/5 short0/2 long | +14.7% | −22.9% | −43.7% | −54.3% | −56.1% | −78.2% | −78.2% | 61.2% | -0.19 | −93.2% | — | $271M | — |
| BILI Internet Content & InformationBilibili Inc. | 1/5 short0/2 long | −8.3% | −24.4% | −44.3% | −47.2% | −49.5% | +11.3% | −83.1% | 77.4% | -0.09 | −94.3% | — | $5.9B | — |
| PLTK Electronic Gaming & MultimediaPlaytika Holding Corp. | 1/5 short0/2 long | −10.0% | −45.0% | −43.0% | −47.7% | −39.2% | −72.7% | −91.5% | 53.1% | -0.67 | −93.0% | — | $793M | — |
How did RBLX do year by year?
This table shows each investment's total return in every full calendar year since 2022, along with where RBLX ranked among its popular alternatives each year. Annual results reveal how consistently each one kept pace with RBLX and how far its good and bad years diverged, detail that multiyear averages tend to smooth over.
Note: RBLX began trading on March 10, 2021, so the table starts with 2022, its first full calendar year, and cannot show how it fared during the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or six other sell-offs.
- RBLX finished ahead of the S&P 500 in three of its four full calendar years, and ahead of it in each of the last three.
- Among its popular alternatives, NVDA came out ahead of RBLX most often, in three of the four years both traded.
- Ranked against its popular alternatives each year, RBLX finished in the top quarter in one of four years and in the bottom quarter in no. In 2025, it ranked 5 of 17.
Newest year first. Green marks a year in which the fund came out ahead of RBLX; gray means the two finished within a fraction of a point. The rank row places RBLX among the alternatives that traded the full year; dark green is the top quarter and red the bottom quarter.
| Investment | Years ahead of RBLX | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RBLX This pageRoblox Corporation | — | +40.0% | +26.6% | +60.6% | −72.4% |
| Rank among alternatives | Top quarter in 1 of 4 | 5 of 17 | 8 of 17 | 6 of 17 | 13 of 17 |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 1 of 4 | +17.7% | +24.9% | +26.2% | −18.2% |
| NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | 3 of 4 | +38.9% | +171% | +239% | −50.2% |
| META Meta Platforms, Inc. | 3 of 4 | +13.1% | +66.0% | +194% | −64.2% |
| GOOG Alphabet Inc. | 3 of 4 | +65.4% | +35.6% | +58.8% | −38.7% |
| APP AppLovin Corporation | 3 of 4 | +108% | +713% | +278% | −88.8% |
| MSFT Microsoft Corporation | 1 of 4 | +15.6% | +12.9% | +58.2% | −28.0% |
| SONY Sony Group Corporation | 1 of 4 | +21.7% | +12.4% | +24.9% | −39.3% |
| NTES NetEase, Inc. | 2 of 4 | +58.3% | −1.7% | +30.6% | −27.4% |
| TTWO Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. | 1 of 4 | +39.1% | +14.4% | +54.6% | −41.4% |
| SNAP Snap Inc. | 1 of 4 | −25.1% | −36.4% | +89.2% | −81.0% |
| SG Sweetgreen, Inc. | 1 of 4 | −78.9% | +184% | +31.9% | −73.2% |
| GRVY Gravity Co., Ltd. | 2 of 4 | −8.3% | −9.3% | +72.5% | −40.8% |
| U Unity Software Inc. | 1 of 4 | +96.6% | −45.1% | +43.0% | −80.0% |
| SOHU Sohu.com Limited | 2 of 4 | +18.7% | +32.7% | −27.6% | −15.8% |
| PLAY Dave & Buster's Entertainment, Inc. | 1 of 4 | −44.5% | −45.8% | +51.9% | −7.7% |
| BILI Bilibili Inc. | 2 of 4 | +35.8% | +48.8% | −48.6% | −48.9% |
| PLTK Playtika Holding Corp. | 1 of 4 | −37.2% | −15.9% | +2.5% | −50.8% |
Risk and diversification
How RBLX has fallen, how it held up in crashes beside the S&P 500 and its popular alternatives, and what moves independently of it.
What were RBLX's worst declines?
A drawdown is the decline from a peak to the lowest point before a new high. This section presents RBLX's five deepest drawdowns since it began trading in 2021, alongside the S&P 500's return over the same dates, and how long each took to recover. Together, these figures show how much an investor could have lost and how long it took to get back to even.
Note: RBLX began trading on March 10, 2021, so this list cannot include the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or six other sell-offs. The crash tests on this page show how older funds and the S&P 500 fared through those years.
- In all five of RBLX's worst declines, the S&P 500 held up better over the same dates.
- Not every decline was the market's doing: RBLX fell 74.9% from September 2025 to August 2026, while the S&P 500 rose 17.4%.
- The slowest recovery came after RBLX fell 82.8% from November 2021 to May 2022; it did not regain that peak until July 2025, three years later.
Green means RBLX fell less than the S&P 500 over the same dates. Based on daily closing prices with dividends reinvested.
| During | RBLX fell | S&P 500, same dates | Peak | Low | Time to the low | Back at the peak | Time to recover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 bear market | −82.8% | −14.3% | Nov 2021 | May 2022 | 6 months | Jul 2025 | 3.2 years |
| No named crash | −74.9% | +17.4% | Sep 2025 | Aug 2026 | 11 months | Not yet | — |
| No named crash | −29.7% | +4.1% | Jun 2021 | Oct 2021 | 4 months | Nov 2021 | 1 month |
| No named crash | −22.0% | +1.2% | Apr 2021 | May 2021 | 1 month | May 2021 | Under a month |
| No named crash | −16.7% | +0.5% | Jul 2025 | Aug 2025 | 1 month | Sep 2025 | 1 month |
How did RBLX do in stock market crashes?
This section measures how far RBLX, the S&P 500 and each alternative fell from peak to trough during every major market crash since 2000. A smaller decline means an investment held up better, and comparing results across crashes shows whether that resilience was consistent or a one-off.
Note: RBLX began trading on March 10, 2021, so its row reads "Not yet trading" for the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or six other sell-offs. The older alternatives and the S&P 500 show how those crashes played out.
- Among its popular alternatives, MSFT held up best, falling less than RBLX in all two crashes they both traded through.
- RBLX began trading after the 2008 financial crisis, but eight of its popular alternatives lived through it. The mildest fall among them was NTES's 41.8%, against 55.2% for the S&P 500.
- RBLX fell further than the S&P 500 in one of the two crashes it has traded through. The clearest case was the 2022 bear market, when RBLX fell 75.6% and the S&P 500 fell 24.5%.
Newest crash first. Each figure is the fund's deepest fall within the crash window; green means a smaller fall than RBLX.
| Investment | Held up better | 2023 regional bank crisisMar 2023 | 2022 bear marketJan 2022 | Covid crashFeb 2020 | Late-2018 sell-offSep 2018 | February 2018 volatility shockFeb 2018 | 2015 China and oil sell-offAug 2015 | 2011 euro debt crisisJul 2011 | 2010 flash crashMay 2010 | 2008 financial crisisOct 2007 | Dot-com bustMar 2000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RBLX This pageRoblox Corporation | — | −3.4% | −75.6% | Not yet trading | Not yet trading | Not yet trading | Not yet trading | Not yet trading | Not yet trading | Not yet trading | Not yet trading |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 1 of 2 | −3.4% | −24.5% | −33.7% | −19.3% | −6.5% | −12.8% | −17.9% | −1.5% | −55.2% | −47.5% |
| NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | 1 of 2 | −5.0% | −60.7% | −37.5% | −55.9% | −8.5% | −25.3% | −23.8% | −1.7% | −85.1% | −89.7% |
| META Meta Platforms, Inc. | 1 of 2 | −2.9% | −62.1% | −32.9% | −26.5% | −9.8% | −13.9% | — | — | — | — |
| GOOG Alphabet Inc. | 1 of 2 | −3.9% | −35.0% | −30.8% | −18.9% | −9.9% | −12.7% | −21.1% | −1.1% | −65.3% | — |
| APP AppLovin Corporation | 0 of 2 | −7.4% | −80.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| MSFT Microsoft Corporation | 2 of 2 | −2.0% | −31.0% | −27.7% | −18.2% | −7.4% | −14.4% | −14.1% | −2.6% | −57.9% | −62.9% |
| SONY Sony Group Corporation | 1 of 2 | −3.8% | −50.6% | −22.9% | −24.3% | −9.7% | −30.2% | −32.0% | −1.0% | −72.3% | −76.2% |
| NTES NetEase, Inc. | 2 of 2 | −2.0% | −33.4% | −24.0% | −17.5% | −8.8% | −28.2% | −29.3% | 0.0% | −41.8% | — |
| TTWO Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. | 1 of 2 | −4.9% | −43.0% | −16.1% | −28.4% | −14.9% | −12.5% | −23.4% | 0.0% | −79.7% | −70.8% |
| SNAP Snap Inc. | 0 of 2 | −7.4% | −78.3% | −51.3% | −45.4% | −9.4% | — | — | — | — | — |
| SG Sweetgreen, Inc. | 1 of 2 | −13.0% | −70.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| GRVY Gravity Co., Ltd. | 1 of 2 | −5.9% | −39.0% | −27.5% | −14.1% | −6.7% | −25.7% | −27.1% | −0.5% | −88.0% | — |
| U Unity Software Inc. | 0 of 2 | −7.6% | −76.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| SOHU Sohu.com Limited | 2 of 2 | −2.4% | −31.6% | −49.7% | −24.4% | −11.1% | −28.9% | −47.4% | −2.5% | −62.1% | — |
| PLAY Dave & Buster's Entertainment, Inc. | 1 of 2 | −13.0% | −38.5% | −89.5% | −34.1% | −6.8% | −27.3% | — | — | — | — |
| BILI Bilibili Inc. | 1 of 2 | −8.0% | −70.2% | −28.2% | −17.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| PLTK Playtika Holding Corp. | 1 of 2 | −6.0% | −55.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
How closely does RBLX move with the S&P 500?
Upside capture measures how much of the S&P 500's gains an investment kept in the months the market rose, and downside capture how much of its losses it took in the months the market fell. An investment that captures more of the gains than the losses has compounded ahead of the market over time. This section compares RBLX with its popular alternatives on both measures, and on beta (how strongly each has moved with the market), over the past 5 years.
- 11 of the 15 popular alternatives had a higher capture ratio (upside capture divided by downside capture) than RBLX's 0.21, led by NVDA, GOOG and NTES.
- NTES took just 73% of the S&P 500's losses, against 115% for RBLX, while still keeping 72% of its gains.
- Over the past 5 years, RBLX captured 24% of the S&P 500's gains in rising months and 115% of its losses in falling months, with a beta of 1.45. Its share of the market's losses was larger than its share of the gains.
Monthly total returns over the past 5 years, measured against SPY. 100% capture or a beta of 1.00 means moving in line with the S&P 500. Green marks a better figure than RBLX's: more upside, less downside or a higher capture ratio. Sorted by capture ratio.
| Investment | Upside capture | Downside capture | Capture ratio | Beta |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RBLX This pageRoblox Corporation | 24% | 115% | 0.21 | 1.45 |
| NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | 259% | 152% | 1.70 | 2.21 |
| GOOG Alphabet Inc. | 140% | 132% | 1.07 | 1.20 |
| NTES NetEase, Inc. | 72% | 73% | 0.98 | 0.67 |
| APP AppLovin Corporation | 257% | 267% | 0.96 | 2.56 |
| META Meta Platforms, Inc. | 139% | 150% | 0.92 | 1.18 |
| MSFT Microsoft Corporation | 115% | 126% | 0.91 | 1.10 |
| TTWO Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. | 66% | 83% | 0.80 | 0.98 |
| SONY Sony Group Corporation | 83% | 137% | 0.60 | 0.99 |
| GRVY Gravity Co., Ltd. | 78% | 175% | 0.44 | 1.03 |
| U Unity Software Inc. | 101% | 308% | 0.33 | 2.10 |
| SOHU Sohu.com Limited | 40% | 131% | 0.31 | 0.31 |
| PLAY Dave & Buster's Entertainment, Inc. | 58% | 313% | 0.18 | 1.92 |
| BILI Bilibili Inc. | 9% | 197% | 0.05 | 0.65 |
| PLTK Playtika Holding Corp. | -19% | 256% | -0.07 | 1.07 |
| SNAP Snap Inc. | -61% | 207% | -0.29 | 1.08 |
What diversifies RBLX?
Correlation measures how closely two investments move together, on a scale from 1 (in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to -1 (in opposite directions). This section lists large ETFs and stocks whose returns have had a low correlation with RBLX's. Because such investments tend not to fall at the same time, pairing RBLX with them can reduce a portfolio's overall swings.
- Moving a fifth of the money in RBLX into MPC would have cut the portfolio's volatility by 21% over the past 5 years and raised its annual return (-10.9% for RBLX alone, +3.8% for the mix).
- Among large ETFs, LVHI, DXJ and EMLP have moved largely independently of RBLX over the past 5 years, with correlations of 0.05 or lower, and each still earned a positive 5-year return.
- In 2022, the one year RBLX lost money (-72.4%), MPC returned +86.6%.
Only ETFs with at least $1.0B in assets and stocks worth at least $10B, with a correlation below 0.5 over the past 5 years and a positive return, are included, ranked by Sharpe ratio; funds that hold the same thing are shown once. The year columns are the years in which RBLX lost money. The last two columns show a portfolio that is 80% RBLX and 20% the other investment, rebalanced monthly.
ETFs
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2022 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RBLX Roblox Corporation (this page) | 1.00 | −33.4% | 0.24 | −72.4% | 64.8% | −10.9% |
| LVHI InternationalFranklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | -0.08 | +119% | 1.48 | +3.8% | 51.7% | −2.4% |
| DXJ InternationalWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund | -0.01 | +225% | 1.34 | +6.0% | 51.8% | −0.8% |
| EMLP Broad MarketFirst Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund | 0.05 | +101% | 1.04 | +10.4% | 52.0% | −2.7% |
| HDV Dividend & IncomeiShares Core High Dividend ETF | -0.05 | +83.3% | 1.00 | +7.1% | 51.7% | −3.2% |
| SMH TechnologyVanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.39 | +323% | 0.97 | −33.5% | 54.9% | +0.2% |
| DBEF InternationalXtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF | 0.19 | +85.0% | 0.96 | −5.1% | 52.3% | −3.2% |
| GLD CommoditiesSPDR Gold Shares | 0.01 | +126% | 0.96 | −0.8% | 51.9% | −2.1% |
| SPMO Broad MarketInvesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 0.33 | +136% | 0.93 | −10.4% | 53.3% | −2.2% |
Stocks
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2022 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RBLX Roblox Corporation (this page) | 1.00 | −33.4% | 0.24 | −72.4% | 64.8% | −10.9% |
| CAH Medical - DistributionCardinal Health, Inc. | 0.03 | +479% | 1.55 | +54.1% | 52.2% | +1.2% |
| CLS Hardware, Equipment & PartsCelestica Inc. | 0.33 | +3,143% | 1.47 | +1.3% | 56.7% | +10.6% |
| FIX Engineering & ConstructionComfort Systems USA, Inc. | 0.33 | +1,636% | 1.46 | +17.0% | 55.4% | +7.4% |
| MCK Medical - DistributionMcKesson Corporation | -0.01 | +413% | 1.44 | +51.8% | 52.0% | +0.8% |
| MPC Oil & Gas Refining & MarketingMarathon Petroleum Corporation | -0.15 | +690% | 1.41 | +86.6% | 51.2% | +3.8% |
Common questions
What was RBLX's worst drawdown?
RBLX's deepest decline since it began trading in 2021 was 82.8%, from November 2021 to May 2022. It took about three years from the low to climb back to its old high. Because RBLX launched in March 2021, that record does not include the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or six other sell-offs.
What were RBLX's best and worst years?
Over four full calendar years, RBLX's best year was 2023, when it returned 60.6%. Its worst was 2022, with a return of -72.4%.
Is there a better investment than RBLX?
Among RBLX's popular alternatives, NVDA, GOOG and META earned more than RBLX with less volatility over the past 5 years. NVDA returned 58.0% a year at 51.9% volatility, against a loss of 7.8% a year at 71.1%. Looking beyond its popular alternatives, AMZN (e-commerce) and T (integrated telecommunications) earned more than RBLX with less volatility over the past 5 years. AMZN returned 9.0% a year at 36.6% volatility, against a loss of 7.8% a year at 71.1%.
Is RBLX more volatile than the S&P 500?
Yes. RBLX's volatility over the past 5 years was 71.1%, 4.1 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, RBLX's return lands within 71.1% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump.
What is RBLX's Sharpe ratio?
RBLX's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.24, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so RBLX earned less for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings.
How correlated is RBLX with the S&P 500?
Over the past 5 years, RBLX's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.35 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They are only loosely linked, which makes it a real diversifier next to an index fund. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against RBLX instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a RBLX holding.
What are the best alternatives to RBLX?
Of the 16 popular alternatives we compared, three outperformed RBLX in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 2 long-term timeframes, with dividends reinvested: NVDA, META and GOOG.
Did RBLX outperform the S&P 500?
RBLX finished ahead of the S&P 500 (SPY) in three of four full calendar years. In 2025, it returned +40.0%, against +17.7% for the index.
How did RBLX do in stock market crashes?
RBLX fell less than the S&P 500 (SPY) in none of the two major crashes it has traded through, and further in one. The clearest case was the 2022 bear market, when RBLX fell 75.6% and the S&P 500 fell 24.5%.
What diversifies RBLX?
These had a low correlation with RBLX over the past 5 years and still earned a positive 5-year return: among large ETFs, LVHI (correlation -0.08), DXJ (correlation -0.01) and EMLP (correlation 0.05); among large stocks, CAH (correlation 0.03), CLS (correlation 0.33) and FIX (correlation 0.33). A correlation near zero means the two have moved largely independently.
How we measure
- Short-term periods are 1M, 3M, 6M, YTD, 1Y; long-term periods are 3Y, 5Y. An investment outperformed in a period when its total return, with dividends reinvested, was higher than RBLX's. Returns within 0.5 points or 3% of RBLX's, whichever is larger, count as a tie.
- "Qualified" means outperforming in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 2 long-term periods. "All-weather" means outperforming in every long-term period and all but one short-term period.
- Popular alternatives are the funds and stocks most often compared with this one. We include only those that trade today, are not leveraged or inverse, and hold at least $200 million.
- Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily returns over 5 years, a measure of how much the price typically swings in a year. The Sharpe ratio is the return above cash for each unit of that volatility.
- A decline, or drawdown, runs from a peak to the lowest close before the next high. The worst decline ever uses all the price history we have; comparisons between funds use the past 10 years so that younger funds are judged on the same stretch.
- Sector overlap is the share of assets two funds hold in the same sectors. Correlation and the mixed-portfolio figures use monthly returns.
- Upside and downside capture follow Morningstar's definition: the compound monthly return in the months the S&P 500 rose (or fell), divided by the S&P 500's compound return in those months. Beta measures how strongly monthly returns have moved with the S&P 500. All three use the same window for every investment.
- Figures are computed from daily adjusted prices and update after each trading day. Past performance does not predict future results.
More research
Popular alternatives to RBLX
NVDANVIDIA
METAMeta Platforms
GOOGAlphabet
APPAppLovin
MSFTMicrosoft
SONYSony Group
NTESNetEase
TTWOTake-Two Interactive Software