Relative Intelligence · Entertainment

How NetEase (NTES) compares with the whole market and its popular alternatives
Built by QuantCommons' quantitative engine, this page is about relative opportunity, not data on NTES alone. It places NTES (NetEase, Inc.) against 14 popular alternatives, its neighboring categories and the entire market of over 10,000 U.S.-listed stocks and ETFs, and surfaces what has done better on consistent outperformance, return for the risk taken, behavior in real market crashes and diversification. The result is a clearer view of where NTES stands in the market, and of the alternatives worth a closer look.
Period covered: NTES's full trading record, from June 2000 through September 2026. The crash tests reach back to 2000 using older funds and the S&P 500. All returns include reinvested dividends. Data as of October 20, 2026.
Data as of October 20, 2026. Full tables and charts read best on a larger screen.
On this page12 sections
Key findings
- Right nowNTES has gone against the market, falling 6.4% over the past 3 months while the S&P 500 rose 3.9%. Its entertainment peers split over the past 3 months: SONY (Sony Group) rose 19.7%, while BILI (Bilibili) fell 24.4%. Consistency ↓
- Stock or market?The weakness is NTES's own: it fell 6.4% over the past 3 months while the entertainment ETF ESPO (VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF) rose 11.5%. The S&P 500 rose 3.9%. Its entertainment peers did not move as one over the past 3 months: SONY (Sony Group) rose 19.7%, while BILI (Bilibili) fell 24.4%.
- Past 1 to 3 yearsOver the past year, NTES fell 16.2% while the S&P 500 rose 15.8%. The same gap shows up over 3 years (34.1% against 89.3%). By year ↓
- Long termNTES turned $10,000 into $28,400 over the past decade, against $42,100 in the S&P 500. Even so, it finished ahead of the S&P 500 in 17 of its 25 calendar years. Growth of $10,000 ↓
- In a crashAcross six sell-offs, NTES has typically fallen 1.3 times as far as the S&P 500. On the flip side, in the 2022 bear market, NTES held up better than SONY (Sony Group), SE and TTWO; only SOHU (Sohu.com) fell less. Crash tests ↓
- DiversificationNTES is a real diversifier: a correlation of 0.30 with the S&P 500 over 5 years and 0.28 with the total US market, less closely than 71% of stocks worth at least $300 million. Over 10 years NTES kept more of the market's gains than of its losses: 64% of the S&P 500's gains in rising months and 52% of its losses in falling ones, with a beta of 0.58. Market capture ↓
- Better options
- Nearby categories and themes
- GOOG (Alphabet, internet services) and T (AT&T, integrated telecommunications) earned more than NTES with less volatility over the past 5 years. GOOG returned 19.0% a year at 32.0% volatility, against 6.6% a year at 41.9%.
- Whole market
- 1,158 of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than NTES with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them AAPL (Apple), GOOG (Alphabet) and MSFT (Microsoft).
How much would $10,000 in NTES have grown?
This chart tracks a hypothetical $10,000 investment in NTES over the past 21 years, with dividends reinvested, alongside the same amount in the S&P 500, investments that ended ahead of NTES over the same span and NTES's popular alternatives, among those that traded for the entire period. A second view covers the past 5 years, the period the better options further down the page are judged on. It shows not only where each investment ended up but also how smooth or uneven the path was.
Note: The chart covers the past 21 years rather than NTES's full 26 years, because most of its popular alternatives have not traded that long.
- $10,000 invested in NTES at the end of September 2005 would have grown to $350,174 by September 2026, more than the $90,973 it would have become in SPY, an S&P 500 fund.
- Five of the eight other investments on the chart ended ahead of NTES, and AAPL finished highest, at $2,081,301.
Choose a period
From the end of September 2005 to the end of September 2026. The scale is logarithmic, so equal steps up the chart are equal percentage gains. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 65 of the 1,562 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of NTES; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- AAPL$2M+20,713% total · +28.9% a year
- APH$802,857+7,929% total · +23.2% a year
- PWR$513,489+5,035% total · +20.6% a year
- GOOG$436,286+4,263% total · +19.7% a year
- LLY$390,765+3,808% total · +19.1% a year
- NTES$350,174+3,402% total · +18.5% a year
- TTWO$93,937+839% total · +11.3% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$90,973+810% total · +11.1% a year
- SONY$41,575+316% total · +7.0% a year
- GRVY$20,265+103% total · +3.4% a year
From the end of September 2021 to the end of September 2026. The scale is logarithmic, so equal steps up the chart are equal percentage gains. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 1,412 of the 3,628 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of NTES; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- LLY$52,411+424% total · +39.3% a year
- GOOG$25,811+158% total · +20.9% a year
- META$21,571+116% total · +16.6% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$19,000+90.0% total · +13.7% a year
- FOXA$16,544+65.4% total · +10.6% a year
- T$16,172+61.7% total · +10.1% a year
- NTES$15,824+58.2% total · +9.6% a year
- TTWO$13,468+34.7% total · +6.1% a year
- SONY$10,955+9.5% total · +1.8% a year
- U$3,242−67.6% total · −20.2% a year
NTES at a glance
This section summarizes the key facts about the stock, its returns over periods from one to ten years and the risk it has carried, with dividends reinvested throughout. These figures serve as the baseline for every comparison that follows.
- NTES's deepest decline since it began trading in 2000 was 96.4%, from July 2000 to July 2001. It took 18 months from the low to climb back to its old high.
- Over 25 full calendar years, NTES's best was 2002, when it returned 1,689%, and its worst was 2001, when it lost 79.1%. It lost money in six of those years.
- NTES is 19.6% below its all-time high.
The company
- Market value
- $80B
- Industry
- Electronic Gaming & Multimedia
- Price history from
- June 2000
Returns
- Past 1 year
- −16.2%total return
- Past 3 years
- +34.1%+10.3% a year
- Past 5 years
- +37.6%+6.6% a year
- Past 10 years
- +184%+11.0% a year
- Best calendar year
- +1,689%2002
- Worst calendar year
- −79.1%2001
- Losing years
- 6 of 25full calendar years
Risk
- Volatility
- 41.9%typical yearly swing, 5 years
- Sharpe ratio
- 0.36return per unit of risk, 5 years
- Worst decline ever
- −96.4%Jul 2000 to Jul 2001
- From its all-time high
- −19.6%below the peak
NTES against the whole market
Where NTES ranks among every stock and fund, and what across the market has done better.
How does NTES rank among all stocks?
This section ranks NTES on return, volatility, risk-adjusted return and worst decline against every stock worth at least $300 million with enough history. Where the comparisons with its popular alternatives show how NTES stacks up against its peers, these rankings show where it stands in the market as a whole.
- NTES's 1-year return ranks in the bottom 23% of the 3,287 stocks worth at least $300 million with 1 year of history.
Ranked against U.S.-listed stocks worth at least $300M that have enough history for each measure, so the count changes from row to row; smaller stocks are left out. Lower volatility and smaller declines rank higher.
| Measure | NTES | Rank | Standing |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | −16.2% | 2,539 of 3,287 | bottom 24% |
| 3-year return | +34.1% | 1,784 of 3,017 | bottom 42% |
| 5-year return | +37.6% | 1,245 of 2,893 | top 43% |
| 10-year return | +184% | 936 of 2,202 | top 43% |
| Volatility, 5 years | 41.9% | 1,549 of 2,893 | bottom 47% |
| Sharpe ratio, 5 years | 0.36 | 1,364 of 2,893 | top 47% |
| Worst decline, past 10 years | −57.4% | 774 of 2,187 | top 35% |
What has beaten NTES on both return and risk?
Each dot is an investment, placed by how much it earned a year over the past 5 years (higher is better) and how much its price swung, its volatility (further left is calmer). NTES sits where the dashed lines cross. Anything in the green box above and to the left earned more than NTES with smaller swings, a better trade-off over this period on both counts. Past results are no promise, but a name in the box is worth a closer look.
- 639 stocks and 519 ETFs worth at least $500 million sit in the green region: each earned more than NTES over the past 5 years with smaller price swings. That is 32% of the 3,633 screened.
- Among those with at least half NTES's swings, CAH has the best return for its risk: 42.1% a year at 24.7% volatility, 41% less than NTES's 41.9%, and a Sharpe ratio (return above cash per unit of volatility) of 1.55 against 0.36 for NTES. PBR-A earned the most, 51.8% a year, while still swinging less than NTES (37.5% against 41.9%).
- None of NTES's popular alternatives made it, but TKO (entertainment) did: 26.3% a year at 32.7% volatility, 22% less than NTES's 41.9%.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested, and volatility the annualized swing in daily prices, both over 5 years. Labeled dots are the strongest picks from the table below and the names called out above, colored by how close they sit to NTES; faint dots are 93 more of the 1,158 in the green region (the strongest, one per fund family). 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million were screened. Hover over a dot for its figures.
- Popular alternatives
- Same and neighboring categories, and shared themes
- The whole market
- Others in the green region
Is there a better investment than NTES?
Investments that beat NTES over the past 5 years on return, volatility, drawdowns, consistency, crash losses or fees, from its popular alternatives out to the whole market.
- Among NTES's popular alternatives, SONY was ahead of NTES in most short and long periods.
- Looking beyond its popular alternatives, GOOG (internet services) and T (integrated telecommunications) earned more than NTES with less volatility over the past 5 years. GOOG returned 19.0% a year at 32.0% volatility, against 6.6% a year at 41.9%.
- Across the whole market, 1,158 of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than NTES with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them AAPL, GOOG and MSFT.
How this works
The table below lists investments that beat NTES over the past 5 years on at least one of these measures: a higher annual return with lower volatility, a higher annual return at similar volatility, a similar return with lower volatility, a higher Sharpe ratio with a smaller worst decline, a higher total return in most periods from 3 months to 10 years, or smaller losses in recent market crashes. It checks NTES's popular alternatives first, then the rest of its own and neighboring categories, then every stock and fund worth at least $500 million, and shows the strongest few in each group. The full list of those with a higher return and lower volatility than NTES follows the table.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested. Annual return, volatility and the Sharpe ratio cover 5 years; the worst decline covers the past 10 years. Green marks a better figure than NTES's. "On the frontier" means no other option shown or tested earned more with less volatility. Funds that hold the same thing are shown once. Beyond the popular alternatives, nothing with more than 1.5× NTES's volatility counts as better.
These figures cover the past 5 years. Green marks a better figure than NTES's.
| Investment | Why it is better | Past 5 years | Downside | Long run | Fit | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Annual return?higher is better | Volatility?lower is calmer | Sharpe?return per unit of risk | Worst decline?past 10 years | 10Y returntotal | Corr. with NTES?lower diversifies more | Expenseper year | |||
| +6.6% | 41.9% | 0.36 | −57.4% | +184% | 1.00 | — | |||
| +12.7% | 17.1% | 0.79 | −33.7% | +321% | 0.30 | 0.09% | |||
| Popular alternativesbest 1 shownThe investments people most often weigh against NTES. 1 of 14 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return in most periods | +2.9% | 29.2% | 0.24 | −50.6% | +309% | 0.34 | — | ||
| Same and neighboring categories, and shared themesbest 6 shownEverything else in Entertainment and the categories next to it (Internet Services, Media, Telecommunications, E-Commerce), plus NTES's specific themes. 30 of 64 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +19.0% | 32.0% | 0.71 | −44.6% | +752% | 0.25 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +9.8% | 25.2% | 0.50 | −39.4% | +60.7% | 0.03 | — | ||
CHTChunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. · Integrated Telecommunications | Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +7.7% | 13.3% | 0.63 | −23.8% | +101% | 0.31 | — | |
FOXAFox Corporation · Media | Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +10.4% | 28.7% | 0.49 | −50.6% | — | 0.21 | — | |
| Higher return, similar volatilityHigher return in most periods | +15.5% | 45.4% | 0.55 | −76.7% | +439% | 0.52 | — | ||
NWSNews Corporation · Media | Similar return, lower volatilityHigher return in most periods | +7.5% | 28.0% | 0.40 | −51.8% | +168% | 0.17 | — | |
| The whole marketbest 8 shownEvery other stock and fund worth at least $500 million. 1,662 of 3,558 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +40.7% | 32.8% | 1.21 | −34.5% | +1,807% | -0.09 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +16.3% | 24.8% | 0.74 | −43.4% | +241% | -0.12 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +19.6% | 24.9% | 0.85 | −24.9% | +266% | -0.24 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +17.7% | 18.9% | 0.96 | −26.4% | +213% | 0.13 | 0.40% | ||
| On the frontierHigher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +17.3% | 18.2% | 0.97 | −40.0% | +352% | 0.19 | — | ||
| On the frontierHigher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +42.1% | 24.7% | 1.55 | −46.1% | +349% | 0.02 | — | ||
| Higher return, similar volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +31.9% | 43.4% | 0.86 | −48.0% | +1,274% | 0.08 | — | ||
| Similar return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +6.8% | 17.6% | 0.47 | −39.4% | +198% | 0.25 | 0.03% | ||
What these numbers mean for NTES
- Annual return
- NTES returned 6.6% a year over the past 5 years with dividends reinvested, against 12.7% a year for the S&P 500. At that pace, $10,000 became about $13,800. Annual return is the steady yearly rate that would produce the same total result, so investments held over the same span compare fairly. Guide: What is performance and return? →
- Volatility
- NTES's volatility over the past 5 years was 41.9%, 2.4 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, NTES's return lands within 41.9% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump. Guide: Understanding and measuring risk (volatility) →
- Sharpe ratio
- NTES's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.36, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so NTES earned less for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings. Guide: Balancing reward with risk (Sharpe ratio) →
- Worst decline
- NTES's worst fall from a peak to a low over the past 10 years was 57.4%, against 33.7% for the S&P 500. Losses and gains are not symmetric: climbing back from a 57.4% fall takes a 134% gain. Guide: Market crash risk and tail risk →
- Correlation
- Over the past 5 years, NTES's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.30 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They are only loosely linked, which makes it a real diversifier next to an index fund. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against NTES instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a NTES holding. Guide: Correlation and diversification →
Show all 1,158 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that earned more than NTES with less volatility
Out of 3,633 tested over 5 years. The strongest 100 are listed, best first, with funds that hold the same thing listed once.
| # | Investment | Found in | Annual return | Volatility | Sharpe | Worst decline | 10Y return | Corr. with NTES | Expense |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Whole market | +40.7% | 32.8% | 1.21 | −34.5% | +1,807% | -0.09 | — | |
| 2 | Whole market | +16.3% | 24.8% | 0.74 | −43.4% | +241% | -0.12 | — | |
| 3 | Whole market | +19.6% | 24.9% | 0.85 | −24.9% | +266% | -0.24 | — | |
| 4 | Whole market | +17.7% | 18.9% | 0.96 | −26.4% | +213% | 0.13 | 0.40% | |
| 5 | Whole market | +17.3% | 18.2% | 0.97 | −40.0% | +352% | 0.19 | — | |
| 6 | Whole market | +42.1% | 24.7% | 1.55 | −46.1% | +349% | 0.02 | — | |
| 7 | Whole market | +18.5% | 28.0% | 0.75 | −38.5% | +1,168% | 0.10 | — | |
| 8 | Whole market | +12.5% | 28.2% | 0.56 | −37.1% | +946% | 0.40 | — | |
| 9 | Whole market | +11.5% | 17.5% | 0.71 | −35.0% | +302% | 0.28 | 0.03% | |
| 10 | Whole market | +12.8% | 16.9% | 0.80 | −34.0% | +324% | 0.30 | 0.03% | |
| 11 | Whole market | +20.8% | 22.6% | 0.96 | −25.7% | +508% | 0.03 | — | |
| 12 | Whole market | +13.4% | 17.1% | 0.82 | −29.6% | +274% | 0.06 | — | |
| 13 | Whole market | +17.3% | 24.3% | 0.78 | −43.6% | +537% | 0.12 | — | |
| 14 | Whole market | +26.1% | 23.4% | 1.11 | −45.1% | +603% | -0.08 | — | |
| 15 | Whole market | +12.7% | 17.9% | 0.76 | −27.4% | +196% | -0.11 | — | |
| 16 | Whole market | +12.8% | 22.9% | 0.64 | −36.4% | +429% | 0.12 | — | |
| 17 | DXJWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund · International Equity | Whole market | +26.6% | 19.1% | 1.34 | −39.1% | +428% | 0.15 | 0.48% |
| 18 | LVHIFranklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +17.0% | 11.1% | 1.48 | −32.4% | +194% | 0.19 | 0.40% |
| 19 | Whole market | +14.7% | 16.8% | 0.91 | −37.0% | +204% | 0.02 | — | |
| 20 | Whole market | +17.4% | 22.9% | 0.82 | −31.4% | +685% | 0.07 | — | |
| 21 | Whole market | +8.2% | 16.4% | 0.57 | −36.0% | +140% | 0.39 | 0.05% | |
| 22 | Whole market | +14.5% | 23.0% | 0.71 | −35.1% | +553% | 0.33 | 0.18% | |
| 23 | Whole market | +12.4% | 23.8% | 0.61 | −41.0% | +541% | 0.18 | — | |
| 24 | Whole market | +21.0% | 23.4% | 0.94 | −42.9% | +242% | 0.08 | — | |
| 25 | Whole market | +16.8% | 26.1% | 0.73 | −42.0% | +374% | 0.06 | — | |
| 26 | Whole market | +38.7% | 25.0% | 1.44 | −38.1% | +586% | -0.05 | — | |
| 27 | Whole market | +17.1% | 20.7% | 0.87 | −26.8% | +226% | 0.15 | — | |
| 28 | Whole market | +33.8% | 32.2% | 1.07 | −37.5% | +965% | 0.16 | — | |
| 29 | Whole market | +12.1% | 13.7% | 0.90 | −36.8% | +235% | 0.15 | 0.03% | |
| 30 | Whole market | +18.6% | 24.3% | 0.83 | −52.0% | +317% | -0.08 | — | |
| 31 | Whole market | +22.8% | 24.9% | 0.95 | −30.5% | +200% | -0.16 | — | |
| 32 | Whole market | +9.3% | 16.9% | 0.61 | −35.8% | +153% | 0.32 | 0.03% | |
| 33 | Whole market | +15.8% | 20.0% | 0.84 | −42.0% | +310% | 0.31 | — | |
| 34 | Whole market | +33.6% | 30.6% | 1.10 | −45.7% | +345% | 0.28 | — | |
| 35 | Whole market | +19.9% | 22.3% | 0.93 | −42.5% | +361% | 0.18 | — | |
| 36 | Whole market | +16.6% | 30.5% | 0.66 | −41.1% | +151% | 0.18 | — | |
| 37 | Whole market | +11.5% | 20.9% | 0.63 | −32.6% | +394% | 0.22 | — | |
| 38 | Whole market | +18.4% | 26.0% | 0.78 | −35.1% | +779% | 0.29 | 0.09% | |
| 39 | Whole market | +33.7% | 29.4% | 1.14 | −47.6% | +474% | 0.30 | — | |
| 40 | Whole market | +16.6% | 31.4% | 0.65 | −44.3% | +398% | 0.28 | — | |
| 41 | Whole market | +19.5% | 34.1% | 0.69 | −33.6% | +652% | 0.18 | — | |
| 42 | Whole market | +21.3% | 25.6% | 0.89 | −30.3% | +816% | 0.02 | — | |
| 43 | Whole market | +15.7% | 20.4% | 0.82 | −42.6% | +248% | -0.01 | — | |
| 44 | Whole market | +39.3% | 37.2% | 1.08 | −45.5% | +2,045% | 0.02 | — | |
| 45 | Whole market | +22.6% | 29.1% | 0.85 | −41.6% | +521% | -0.11 | — | |
| 46 | Whole market | +20.4% | 32.1% | 0.74 | −44.5% | +657% | 0.12 | — | |
| 47 | Whole market | +22.7% | 24.4% | 0.97 | −50.5% | +341% | 0.23 | — | |
| 48 | Whole market | +19.2% | 21.6% | 0.93 | −47.3% | +395% | 0.09 | — | |
| 49 | NPKNational Presto Industries, Inc. · Aerospace & Defense | Whole market | +16.3% | 27.3% | 0.69 | −45.5% | +181% | -0.02 | — |
| 50 | Whole market | +14.4% | 29.9% | 0.60 | −37.9% | +755% | 0.02 | — | |
| 51 | Whole market | +10.4% | 14.1% | 0.78 | −31.7% | +258% | 0.24 | 0.04% | |
| 52 | Whole market | +22.4% | 22.3% | 1.02 | −46.3% | +347% | -0.07 | — | |
| 53 | Whole market | +22.7% | 27.7% | 0.88 | −40.5% | +955% | 0.16 | — | |
| 54 | Whole market | +24.2% | 22.8% | 1.07 | −32.4% | +406% | 0.09 | — | |
| 55 | Whole market | +9.7% | 14.3% | 0.72 | −33.4% | +252% | 0.05 | 0.06% | |
| 56 | Whole market | +13.6% | 21.4% | 0.71 | −51.0% | +295% | 0.21 | — | |
| 57 | Whole market | +26.3% | 24.9% | 1.07 | −41.6% | +654% | 0.07 | — | |
| 58 | Whole market | +12.9% | 19.9% | 0.71 | −46.9% | +187% | 0.30 | — | |
| 59 | Whole market | +12.2% | 29.0% | 0.54 | −37.5% | +464% | 0.25 | — | |
| 60 | Whole market | +21.0% | 26.8% | 0.85 | −50.8% | +694% | 0.16 | — | |
| 61 | Whole market | +17.2% | 24.9% | 0.77 | −30.4% | +285% | 0.17 | — | |
| 62 | Whole market | +33.4% | 36.9% | 0.97 | −45.3% | +1,665% | 0.35 | 0.35% | |
| 63 | Whole market | +11.1% | 24.2% | 0.56 | −36.7% | +204% | -0.20 | — | |
| 64 | Whole market | +10.3% | 16.2% | 0.69 | −34.2% | +223% | 0.34 | 0.06% | |
| 65 | Whole market | +11.3% | 18.8% | 0.67 | −38.4% | +170% | 0.14 | — | |
| 66 | Whole market | +16.5% | 23.1% | 0.78 | −48.4% | +808% | 0.11 | — | |
| 67 | Whole market | +11.2% | 20.8% | 0.62 | −37.4% | +319% | 0.09 | — | |
| 68 | Whole market | +17.4% | 29.1% | 0.70 | −46.4% | +426% | 0.16 | — | |
| 69 | Whole market | +13.9% | 18.5% | 0.80 | −34.0% | +446% | 0.17 | — | |
| 70 | Whole market | +9.0% | 22.9% | 0.49 | −40.8% | +320% | 0.16 | — | |
| 71 | PJULInnovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +10.5% | 8.6% | 1.20 | −18.2% | — | 0.30 | 0.79% |
| 72 | Whole market | +8.2% | 16.1% | 0.57 | −39.0% | +211% | 0.22 | 0.20% | |
| 73 | Whole market | +15.9% | 23.4% | 0.75 | −42.0% | +393% | -0.01 | — | |
| 74 | Whole market | +18.1% | 29.5% | 0.71 | −51.4% | +312% | 0.15 | — | |
| 75 | Whole market | +14.8% | 23.6% | 0.71 | −32.8% | +625% | 0.02 | — | |
| 76 | Whole market | +27.5% | 36.9% | 0.85 | −46.7% | +510% | 0.06 | — | |
| 77 | Whole market | +9.3% | 19.2% | 0.56 | −30.1% | +344% | 0.18 | — | |
| 78 | Whole market | +12.7% | 27.7% | 0.57 | −50.8% | +309% | 0.12 | — | |
| 79 | Whole market | +9.5% | 24.5% | 0.49 | −37.6% | +95.1% | -0.01 | — | |
| 80 | ESLTElbit Systems Ltd. · Aerospace & Defense | Whole market | +39.8% | 34.6% | 1.15 | −35.4% | +765% | -0.15 | — |
| 81 | Whole market | +11.8% | 22.6% | 0.61 | −39.2% | +118% | 0.29 | — | |
| 82 | FJANFT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - January · Multi-Asset | Whole market | +11.1% | 10.5% | 1.05 | −13.6% | — | 0.27 | 0.85% |
| 83 | EMEEMCOR Group, Inc. · Engineering & Construction | Whole market | +43.0% | 35.3% | 1.20 | −48.0% | +1,202% | 0.08 | — |
| 84 | Whole market | +14.8% | 37.2% | 0.56 | −34.2% | +1,139% | 0.33 | — | |
| 85 | Whole market | +19.2% | 22.4% | 0.90 | −42.0% | +311% | 0.02 | — | |
| 86 | Whole market | +19.7% | 23.2% | 0.90 | −48.8% | +292% | 0.05 | — | |
| 87 | Whole market | +12.4% | 20.2% | 0.68 | −32.9% | +185% | 0.14 | — | |
| 88 | Whole market | +17.0% | 26.2% | 0.73 | −41.4% | +356% | -0.02 | — | |
| 89 | Same or nearby category | +19.0% | 32.0% | 0.71 | −44.6% | +752% | 0.25 | — | |
| 90 | Whole market | +15.8% | 24.6% | 0.72 | −30.7% | +576% | 0.15 | — | |
| 91 | Whole market | +8.3% | 23.3% | 0.46 | −40.5% | +446% | 0.20 | — | |
| 92 | Whole market | +13.1% | 22.4% | 0.67 | −34.5% | +451% | 0.33 | 0.04% | |
| 93 | Whole market | +14.4% | 22.1% | 0.72 | −42.7% | +481% | 0.09 | — | |
| 94 | Whole market | +13.3% | 30.0% | 0.57 | −39.2% | +711% | 0.26 | — | |
| 95 | Whole market | +14.7% | 17.5% | 0.87 | −34.7% | — | 0.30 | 0.26% | |
| 96 | Whole market | +10.9% | 24.2% | 0.55 | −44.4% | +516% | 0.22 | — | |
| 97 | Whole market | +8.2% | 19.4% | 0.51 | −45.3% | +169% | 0.15 | 0.05% | |
| 98 | CBOECboe Global Markets, Inc. · Capital Markets | Whole market | +21.5% | 25.1% | 0.91 | −43.2% | +463% | 0.00 | — |
| 99 | Whole market | +17.9% | 25.4% | 0.78 | −42.5% | +284% | 0.27 | — | |
| 100 | Whole market | +13.9% | 34.5% | 0.55 | −42.6% | +923% | 0.01 | — |
NTES against its popular alternatives
The investments people most often weigh against NTES, compared period by period and year by year.
How do NTES's risk and return compare with its alternatives?
This map plots each investment's annual return over the past 5 years against its volatility, the size of its typical price swings. Investments toward the upper left earned more for a smoother ride, and those toward the lower right earned less for a rougher one. The dashed lines cross at NTES, which divides the map into what did better or worse on each measure.
- None of the 14 popular alternatives earned more than NTES over the past 5 years with smaller price swings, so every higher return on the map came with a bumpier ride.
- 11 of the 14 popular alternatives earned less than NTES over the past 5 years while swinging more, the weaker corner of the map.
- Over the past 5 years, NTES returned 6.6% a year, less than the S&P 500's 12.7%, with higher volatility (41.9% against 17.1%).
Green points earned more than NTES with less volatility; red points earned less with more. Hover over a point for its figures. Total returns with dividends reinvested, annualized.
All figures
| Investment | Annual return | Volatility |
|---|---|---|
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | +12.7% | 17.1% |
| NTES This pageNetEase, Inc. | +6.6% | 41.9% |
| TTWO Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. | +3.6% | 32.9% |
| SONY Sony Group Corporation | +2.9% | 29.2% |
| PDD PDD Holdings Inc. | −3.9% | 66.0% |
| RBLX Roblox Corporation | −7.8% | 71.1% |
| BABA Alibaba Group Holding Limited | −8.2% | 51.3% |
| GRVY Gravity Co., Ltd. | −8.2% | 41.9% |
| SOHU Sohu.com Limited | −11.1% | 42.3% |
| BIDU Baidu, Inc. | −15.0% | 51.9% |
| JD JD.com, Inc. | −18.6% | 52.6% |
| U Unity Software Inc. | −22.4% | 77.5% |
| SE Sea Limited | −25.9% | 64.6% |
| PLAY Dave & Buster's Entertainment, Inc. | −26.3% | 61.2% |
| BILI Bilibili Inc. | −29.9% | 77.4% |
| PLTK Playtika Holding Corp. | −38.9% | 53.1% |
Has NTES consistently beaten its popular alternatives?
This section compares NTES with the investments people most often weigh against it, checking each one over eight periods from one month to ten years. Counting how often an alternative earned more than NTES helps separate lasting outperformance from a single strong stretch.
- Only one of the 14 popular alternatives, SONY, outperformed NTES in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes.
A green cell means the alternative earned more than NTES over that period. "Qualified" marks those that did so in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods.
| Investment | Periods outperformed | Short term | Long term | Risk · 5 years | Fund | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1M | 3M | 6M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | 10Y | Volatilitylower is calmer | Sharpehigher is better | Worst declinepast 10 years | Expense | Assets | Overlapsame sectors | ||
| NTES NetEase, Inc. (this page) | — | +6.5% | −6.4% | +6.9% | −13.5% | −16.2% | +34.1% | +37.6% | +184% | 41.9% | 0.36 | −57.4% | — | $80B | — |
| SONY QualifiedSony Group Corporation | 5/5 short2/3 long | +7.3% | +19.7% | +18.1% | −2.2% | −13.2% | +54.0% | +15.4% | +309% | 29.2% | 0.24 | −50.6% | — | $150B | — |
| TTWO Electronic Gaming & MultimediaTake-Two Interactive Software, Inc. | 0/5 short2/3 long | −1.5% | −13.5% | −4.7% | −17.8% | −21.2% | +47.0% | +19.1% | +360% | 32.9% | 0.27 | −56.1% | — | $39B | — |
| U Software - ApplicationUnity Software Inc. | 4/5 short1/3 long | −7.1% | +34.7% | +51.4% | −9.2% | +13.9% | +47.8% | −71.8% | — | 77.5% | 0.06 | −93.1% | — | $18B | — |
| GRVY Electronic Gaming & MultimediaGravity Co., Ltd. | 3/5 short1/3 long | −3.9% | +8.0% | +2.9% | +14.1% | +15.2% | +2.8% | −34.9% | +2,415% | 41.9% | 0.01 | −83.2% | — | $465M | — |
| SOHU Internet Content & InformationSohu.com Limited | 2/5 short1/3 long | −2.1% | −5.2% | −20.1% | −20.6% | −14.0% | +54.6% | −44.3% | −70.0% | 42.3% | -0.07 | −92.2% | — | $378M | — |
| RBLX Electronic Gaming & MultimediaRoblox Corporation | 1/5 short1/3 long | +2.1% | −1.7% | −15.3% | −35.3% | −61.2% | +64.8% | −33.4% | — | 71.1% | 0.24 | −82.8% | — | $37B | — |
| BABA Specialty RetailAlibaba Group Holding Limited | 0/5 short1/3 long | −6.1% | −9.7% | −21.7% | −29.6% | −36.8% | +44.5% | −34.8% | +11.2% | 51.3% | 0.08 | −80.1% | — | $270B | — |
| SE Specialty RetailSea Limited | 0/5 short1/3 long | −21.6% | −23.9% | −10.0% | −38.8% | −51.5% | +80.3% | −77.7% | — | 64.6% | -0.14 | −90.5% | — | $49B | — |
| JD Specialty RetailJD.com, Inc. | 1/5 short0/3 long | −1.9% | −12.5% | −14.7% | −6.2% | −18.0% | +20.2% | −64.3% | +14.4% | 52.6% | -0.14 | −79.1% | — | $36B | — |
| PLAY LeisureDave & Buster's Entertainment, Inc. | 1/5 short0/3 long | +14.7% | −22.9% | −43.7% | −54.3% | −56.1% | −78.2% | −78.2% | −80.4% | 61.2% | -0.19 | −93.2% | — | $271M | — |
| PDD Specialty RetailPDD Holdings Inc. | 1/5 short0/3 long | +2.9% | −5.1% | −21.7% | −29.5% | −38.0% | −20.6% | −17.9% | — | 66.0% | 0.26 | −87.4% | — | $116B | — |
| BIDU Internet Content & InformationBaidu, Inc. | 0/5 short0/3 long | −12.7% | −26.7% | −37.0% | −46.4% | −34.1% | −24.4% | −55.5% | −54.0% | 51.9% | -0.06 | −77.5% | — | $27B | — |
| BILI Internet Content & InformationBilibili Inc. | 0/5 short0/3 long | −8.3% | −24.4% | −44.3% | −47.2% | −49.5% | +11.3% | −83.1% | — | 77.4% | -0.09 | −94.3% | — | $5.9B | — |
| PLTK Electronic Gaming & MultimediaPlaytika Holding Corp. | 0/5 short0/3 long | −10.0% | −45.0% | −43.0% | −47.7% | −39.2% | −72.7% | −91.5% | — | 53.1% | -0.67 | −93.0% | — | $793M | — |
How did NTES do year by year?
This table shows each investment's total return in every full calendar year since 2001, along with where NTES ranked among its popular alternatives each year. Annual results reveal how consistently each one kept pace with NTES and how far its good and bad years diverged, detail that multiyear averages tend to smooth over.
- Ranked against its popular alternatives each year, NTES finished in the top quarter in nine of 20 years and in the bottom quarter in one. In 2025, it ranked 3 of 15.
- NTES finished ahead of the S&P 500 in 17 of its 25 full calendar years.
- Among its popular alternatives, SE came out ahead of NTES most often, in five of the eight years both traded.
Newest year first. Green marks a year in which the fund came out ahead of NTES; gray means the two finished within a fraction of a point. The rank row places NTES among the alternatives that traded the full year; dark green is the top quarter and red the bottom quarter.
| Investment | Years ahead of NTES | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NTES This pageNetEase, Inc. | — | +58.3% | −1.7% | +30.6% | −27.4% | +7.1% | +57.9% | +34.7% | −31.3% | +62.2% | +20.7% | +85.3% | +30.3% | +89.0% | −5.1% | +23.9% | −3.8% | +70.0% | +16.8% | +1.4% | +32.9% | +5.9% | +43.7% | +223% | +1,689% | −79.1% |
| Rank among alternatives | Top quarter in 9 of 20 | 3 of 15 | 9 of 15 | 7 of 15 | 7 of 15 | 4 of 13 | 8 of 12 | 6 of 12 | 7 of 10 | 5 of 9 | 4 of 9 | 1 of 9 | 2 of 6 | 1 of 6 | 1 of 6 | 1 of 6 | 6 of 6 | 3 of 6 | 1 of 6 | 5 of 6 | 2 of 6 | — | — | — | — | — |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 8 of 25 | +17.7% | +24.9% | +26.2% | −18.2% | +28.7% | +18.3% | +31.2% | −4.6% | +21.7% | +12.0% | +1.2% | +13.5% | +32.3% | +16.0% | +1.9% | +15.1% | +26.4% | −36.8% | +5.1% | +15.9% | +4.8% | +10.7% | +28.2% | −21.6% | −11.7% |
| SONY Sony Group Corporation | 7 of 25 | +21.7% | +12.4% | +24.9% | −39.3% | +25.6% | +49.7% | +41.7% | +8.1% | +61.1% | +14.8% | +20.7% | +19.0% | +56.6% | −36.7% | −48.8% | +24.1% | +34.2% | −59.3% | +27.3% | +5.6% | +5.5% | +13.0% | −15.6% | −8.0% | −34.9% |
| TTWO Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. | 10 of 25 | +39.1% | +14.4% | +54.6% | −41.4% | −14.5% | +69.7% | +18.9% | −6.2% | +123% | +41.5% | +24.3% | +61.4% | +57.8% | −18.7% | +10.4% | +22.1% | +32.9% | −59.0% | +3.9% | +0.3% | −23.7% | +20.3% | +23.1% | +45.3% | +40.6% |
| U Unity Software Inc. | 2 of 5 | +96.6% | −45.1% | +43.0% | −80.0% | −6.8% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| GRVY Gravity Co., Ltd. | 7 of 20 | −8.3% | −9.3% | +72.5% | −40.8% | −62.3% | +383% | −10.8% | −11.2% | +795% | +234% | −34.2% | −34.8% | −30.8% | −8.3% | −15.2% | +4.9% | +226% | −83.9% | −46.8% | −18.8% | — | — | — | — | — |
| SOHU Sohu.com Limited | 6 of 25 | +18.7% | +32.7% | −27.6% | −15.8% | +2.1% | +42.6% | −35.8% | −59.8% | +27.9% | −40.7% | +7.5% | −27.1% | +54.1% | −5.3% | −21.3% | +10.8% | +21.0% | −13.2% | +127% | +30.9% | +3.6% | −40.8% | +367% | +433% | −49.6% |
| RBLX Roblox Corporation | 2 of 4 | +40.0% | +26.6% | +60.6% | −72.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| BABA Alibaba Group Holding Limited | 6 of 11 | +75.8% | +11.8% | −10.8% | −25.9% | −49.0% | +9.7% | +54.7% | −20.5% | +96.4% | +8.1% | −21.8% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| SE Sea Limited | 5 of 8 | +20.2% | +162% | −22.2% | −76.7% | +12.4% | +395% | +255% | −15.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| JD JD.com, Inc. | 4 of 11 | −14.9% | +23.5% | −47.8% | −17.9% | −20.3% | +149% | +68.3% | −49.5% | +62.9% | −21.2% | +39.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| PLAY Dave & Buster's Entertainment, Inc. | 5 of 11 | −44.5% | −45.8% | +51.9% | −7.7% | +27.9% | −25.0% | −8.9% | −18.8% | −2.0% | +34.9% | +52.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| PDD PDD Holdings Inc. | 4 of 7 | +16.9% | −33.7% | +79.4% | +39.9% | −67.2% | +370% | +68.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| BIDU Baidu, Inc. | 6 of 20 | +55.0% | −29.2% | +4.1% | −23.1% | −31.2% | +71.1% | −20.3% | −32.3% | +42.4% | −13.0% | −17.1% | +28.2% | +77.4% | −13.9% | +20.7% | +135% | +215% | −66.5% | +246% | +79.2% | — | — | — | — | — |
| BILI Bilibili Inc. | 2 of 7 | +35.8% | +48.8% | −48.6% | −48.9% | −45.9% | +360% | +27.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| PLTK Playtika Holding Corp. | 0 of 4 | −37.2% | −15.9% | +2.5% | −50.8% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Risk and diversification
How NTES has fallen, how it held up in crashes beside the S&P 500 and its popular alternatives, and what moves independently of it.
What were NTES's worst declines?
A drawdown is the decline from a peak to the lowest point before a new high. This section presents NTES's five deepest drawdowns since it began trading in 2000, alongside the S&P 500's return over the same dates, and how long each took to recover. Together, these figures show how much an investor could have lost and how long it took to get back to even.
- In all five of NTES's worst declines, the S&P 500 held up better over the same dates.
- Not every decline was the market's doing: NTES fell 57.4% from October 2003 to August 2004, while the S&P 500 rose 3.7%.
- The slowest recovery came after NTES fell 57.4% from February 2021 to October 2022; it did not regain that peak until May 2025, three years later.
Green means NTES fell less than the S&P 500 over the same dates. Based on daily closing prices with dividends reinvested.
| During | NTES fell | S&P 500, same dates | Peak | Low | Time to the low | Back at the peak | Time to recover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dot-com bust | −96.4% | −17.4% | Jul 2000 | Jul 2001 | 12 months | Jan 2003 | 18 months |
| No named crash | −57.4% | +3.7% | Oct 2003 | Aug 2004 | 10 months | Aug 2005 | 12 months |
| 2022 bear market | −57.4% | +2.1% | Feb 2021 | Oct 2022 | 20 months | May 2025 | 2.6 years |
| February 2018 volatility shock | −49.0% | +8.6% | Dec 2017 | Sep 2018 | 9 months | Feb 2020 | 17 months |
| No named crash | −43.8% | +12.0% | Mar 2006 | Aug 2007 | 17 months | May 2008 | 9 months |
How did NTES do in stock market crashes?
This section measures how far NTES, the S&P 500 and each alternative fell from peak to trough during every major market crash since 2000. A smaller decline means an investment held up better, and comparing results across crashes shows whether that resilience was consistent or a one-off.
Note: NTES began trading on June 30, 2000, so its row reads "Not yet trading" for the dot-com bust. The older alternatives and the S&P 500 show how those crashes played out.
- None of its popular alternatives fell less than NTES in most of the crashes they both traded through.
- NTES began trading after the dot-com bust, but two of its popular alternatives lived through it. The mildest fall among them was TTWO's 70.8%, against 47.5% for the S&P 500.
- NTES fell less than the S&P 500 in five of the nine crashes it has traded through. The clearest case was the 2008 financial crisis, when NTES fell 41.8% and the S&P 500 fell 55.2%.
Newest crash first. Each figure is the fund's deepest fall within the crash window; green means a smaller fall than NTES.
| Investment | Held up better | 2023 regional bank crisisMar 2023 | 2022 bear marketJan 2022 | Covid crashFeb 2020 | Late-2018 sell-offSep 2018 | February 2018 volatility shockFeb 2018 | 2015 China and oil sell-offAug 2015 | 2011 euro debt crisisJul 2011 | 2010 flash crashMay 2010 | 2008 financial crisisOct 2007 | Dot-com bustMar 2000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NTES This pageNetEase, Inc. | — | −2.0% | −33.4% | −24.0% | −17.5% | −8.8% | −28.2% | −29.3% | 0.0% | −41.8% | Not yet trading |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 4 of 9 | −3.4% | −24.5% | −33.7% | −19.3% | −6.5% | −12.8% | −17.9% | −1.5% | −55.2% | −47.5% |
| SONY Sony Group Corporation | 1 of 9 | −3.8% | −50.6% | −22.9% | −24.3% | −9.7% | −30.2% | −32.0% | −1.0% | −72.3% | −76.2% |
| TTWO Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. | 3 of 9 | −4.9% | −43.0% | −16.1% | −28.4% | −14.9% | −12.5% | −23.4% | 0.0% | −79.7% | −70.8% |
| U Unity Software Inc. | 0 of 2 | −7.6% | −76.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| GRVY Gravity Co., Ltd. | 4 of 9 | −5.9% | −39.0% | −27.5% | −14.1% | −6.7% | −25.7% | −27.1% | −0.5% | −88.0% | — |
| SOHU Sohu.com Limited | 1 of 9 | −2.4% | −31.6% | −49.7% | −24.4% | −11.1% | −28.9% | −47.4% | −2.5% | −62.1% | — |
| RBLX Roblox Corporation | 0 of 2 | −3.4% | −75.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| BABA Alibaba Group Holding Limited | 2 of 6 | −4.7% | −45.1% | −20.6% | −20.7% | −7.3% | −29.1% | — | — | — | — |
| SE Sea Limited | 0 of 5 | −8.0% | −73.3% | −27.7% | −26.4% | −8.8% | — | — | — | — | — |
| JD JD.com, Inc. | 2 of 6 | −14.6% | −45.1% | −21.0% | −27.3% | −8.2% | −29.9% | — | — | — | — |
| PLAY Dave & Buster's Entertainment, Inc. | 2 of 6 | −13.0% | −38.5% | −89.5% | −34.1% | −6.8% | −27.3% | — | — | — | — |
| PDD PDD Holdings Inc. | 1 of 4 | −7.9% | −61.4% | −15.7% | −38.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| BIDU Baidu, Inc. | 0 of 9 | −7.5% | −36.6% | −38.4% | −31.8% | −9.0% | −35.5% | −36.0% | −4.3% | −74.9% | — |
| BILI Bilibili Inc. | 0 of 4 | −8.0% | −70.2% | −28.2% | −17.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| PLTK Playtika Holding Corp. | 0 of 2 | −6.0% | −55.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
How closely does NTES move with the S&P 500?
Upside capture measures how much of the S&P 500's gains an investment kept in the months the market rose, and downside capture how much of its losses it took in the months the market fell. An investment that captures more of the gains than the losses has compounded ahead of the market over time. This section compares NTES with its popular alternatives on both measures, and on beta (how strongly each has moved with the market), over the past 10 years.
- None of the seven popular alternatives with the same record had a higher capture ratio (upside capture divided by downside capture) than NTES's 1.24.
- Over the past 10 years, NTES captured 64% of the S&P 500's gains in rising months and 52% of its losses in falling months, with a beta of 0.58. That is a defensive profile: it gave up some of the market's upside in exchange for smaller losses.
- GRVY took just -14% of the S&P 500's losses, against 52% for NTES, while still keeping 106% of its gains.
Monthly total returns over the past 10 years, measured against SPY. 100% capture or a beta of 1.00 means moving in line with the S&P 500. Green marks a better figure than NTES's: more upside, less downside or a higher capture ratio. Sorted by capture ratio.
| Investment | Upside capture | Downside capture | Capture ratio | Beta |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NTES This pageNetEase, Inc. | 64% | 52% | 1.24 | 0.58 |
| TTWO Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. | 91% | 75% | 1.21 | 0.78 |
| SONY Sony Group Corporation | 96% | 99% | 0.97 | 0.86 |
| JD JD.com, Inc. | 51% | 92% | 0.56 | 0.57 |
| BABA Alibaba Group Holding Limited | 74% | 140% | 0.53 | 0.65 |
| BIDU Baidu, Inc. | 56% | 159% | 0.35 | 0.79 |
| SOHU Sohu.com Limited | 58% | 194% | 0.30 | 1.19 |
| PLAY Dave & Buster's Entertainment, Inc. | 78% | 266% | 0.29 | 1.98 |
| GRVY Gravity Co., Ltd. | 106% | -14% | — | 0.35 |
What diversifies NTES?
Correlation measures how closely two investments move together, on a scale from 1 (in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to -1 (in opposite directions). This section lists large ETFs and stocks whose returns have had a low correlation with NTES's. Because such investments tend not to fall at the same time, pairing NTES with them can reduce a portfolio's overall swings.
- Moving a fifth of the money in NTES into HDV would have cut the portfolio's volatility by 20% over the past 5 years and raised its annual return (+9.6% for NTES alone, +11.4% for the mix).
- FIX made money in six of the six calendar years in which NTES lost money.
- Among large ETFs, LVHI, DXJ and EMLP have moved largely independently of NTES over the past 5 years, with correlations of 0.19 or lower, and each still earned a positive 5-year return.
Only ETFs with at least $1.0B in assets and stocks worth at least $10B, with a correlation below 0.5 over the past 5 years and a positive return, are included, ranked by Sharpe ratio; funds that hold the same thing are shown once. The year columns are the years in which NTES lost money. The last two columns show a portfolio that is 80% NTES and 20% the other investment, rebalanced monthly.
ETFs
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2024 | 2022 | 2018 | 2012 | 2010 | 2001 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NTES NetEase, Inc. (this page) | 1.00 | +37.6% | 0.36 | −1.7% | −27.4% | −31.3% | −5.1% | −3.8% | −79.1% | 35.3% | +9.6% |
| LVHI InternationalFranklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 0.19 | +119% | 1.48 | +15.9% | +3.8% | −5.2% | — | — | — | 28.7% | +12.1% |
| DXJ InternationalWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund | 0.15 | +225% | 1.34 | +29.8% | +6.0% | −19.8% | +19.6% | −1.8% | — | 28.8% | +14.1% |
| EMLP Broad MarketFirst Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund | 0.12 | +101% | 1.04 | +33.4% | +10.4% | −8.7% | — | — | — | 28.8% | +12.0% |
| HDV Dividend & IncomeiShares Core High Dividend ETF | 0.01 | +83.3% | 1.00 | +14.1% | +7.1% | −3.0% | +9.6% | — | — | 28.4% | +11.4% |
| SMH TechnologyVanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.35 | +323% | 0.97 | +39.1% | −33.5% | −9.1% | +8.6% | +19.0% | −14.6% | 31.4% | +16.2% |
| DBEF InternationalXtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF | 0.26 | +85.0% | 0.96 | +13.4% | −5.1% | −9.5% | +20.9% | — | — | 28.9% | +11.5% |
| GLD CommoditiesSPDR Gold Shares | 0.13 | +126% | 0.96 | +26.7% | −0.8% | −1.9% | +6.6% | +29.3% | — | 28.9% | +12.6% |
| SPMO Broad MarketInvesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 0.18 | +136% | 0.93 | +45.8% | −10.4% | −0.9% | — | — | — | 29.3% | +13.2% |
Stocks
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2024 | 2022 | 2018 | 2012 | 2010 | 2001 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NTES NetEase, Inc. (this page) | 1.00 | +37.6% | 0.36 | −1.7% | −27.4% | −31.3% | −5.1% | −3.8% | −79.1% | 35.3% | +9.6% |
| CAH Medical - DistributionCardinal Health, Inc. | 0.02 | +479% | 1.55 | +19.0% | +54.1% | −24.5% | +3.8% | +21.4% | −2.5% | 28.9% | +16.5% |
| CLS Hardware, Equipment & PartsCelestica Inc. | 0.18 | +3,143% | 1.47 | +215% | +1.3% | −16.3% | +11.2% | +2.8% | −25.6% | 32.5% | +28.8% |
| FIX Engineering & ConstructionComfort Systems USA, Inc. | 0.07 | +1,636% | 1.46 | +107% | +17.0% | +0.8% | +15.7% | +8.7% | +73.7% | 30.3% | +25.2% |
| MCK Medical - DistributionMcKesson Corporation | -0.05 | +413% | 1.44 | +23.7% | +51.8% | −28.4% | +25.6% | +13.8% | +4.9% | 28.5% | +16.0% |
| MPC Oil & Gas Refining & MarketingMarathon Petroleum Corporation | 0.14 | +690% | 1.41 | −4.0% | +86.6% | −8.2% | +94.3% | — | — | 29.9% | +18.4% |
Common questions
What was NTES's worst drawdown?
NTES's deepest decline since it began trading in 2000 was 96.4%, from July 2000 to July 2001. It took 18 months from the low to climb back to its old high.
What were NTES's best and worst years?
Over 25 full calendar years, NTES's best year was 2002, when it returned 1,689%. Its worst was 2001, with a return of -79.1%.
Is there a better investment than NTES?
Among NTES's popular alternatives, SONY was ahead of NTES in most short and long periods. Looking beyond its popular alternatives, GOOG (internet services) and T (integrated telecommunications) earned more than NTES with less volatility over the past 5 years. GOOG returned 19.0% a year at 32.0% volatility, against 6.6% a year at 41.9%.
Is NTES more volatile than the S&P 500?
Yes. NTES's volatility over the past 5 years was 41.9%, 2.4 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, NTES's return lands within 41.9% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump.
What is NTES's Sharpe ratio?
NTES's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.36, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so NTES earned less for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings.
How correlated is NTES with the S&P 500?
Over the past 5 years, NTES's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.30 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They are only loosely linked, which makes it a real diversifier next to an index fund. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against NTES instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a NTES holding.
What are the best alternatives to NTES?
Of the 14 popular alternatives we compared, one outperformed NTES in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes, with dividends reinvested: SONY.
Did NTES outperform the S&P 500?
NTES finished ahead of the S&P 500 (SPY) in 17 of 25 full calendar years. In 2025, it returned +58.3%, against +17.7% for the index.
How did NTES do in stock market crashes?
NTES fell less than the S&P 500 (SPY) in five of the nine major crashes it has traded through, and further in four. The clearest case was the 2008 financial crisis, when NTES fell 41.8% and the S&P 500 fell 55.2%.
What diversifies NTES?
These had a low correlation with NTES over the past 5 years and still earned a positive 5-year return: among large ETFs, LVHI (correlation 0.19), DXJ (correlation 0.15) and EMLP (correlation 0.12); among large stocks, CAH (correlation 0.02), CLS (correlation 0.18) and FIX (correlation 0.07). A correlation near zero means the two have moved largely independently.
How we measure
- Short-term periods are 1M, 3M, 6M, YTD, 1Y; long-term periods are 3Y, 5Y, 10Y. An investment outperformed in a period when its total return, with dividends reinvested, was higher than NTES's. Returns within 0.5 points or 3% of NTES's, whichever is larger, count as a tie.
- "Qualified" means outperforming in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods. "All-weather" means outperforming in every long-term period and all but one short-term period.
- Popular alternatives are the funds and stocks most often compared with this one. We include only those that trade today, are not leveraged or inverse, and hold at least $200 million.
- Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily returns over 5 years, a measure of how much the price typically swings in a year. The Sharpe ratio is the return above cash for each unit of that volatility.
- A decline, or drawdown, runs from a peak to the lowest close before the next high. The worst decline ever uses all the price history we have; comparisons between funds use the past 10 years so that younger funds are judged on the same stretch.
- Sector overlap is the share of assets two funds hold in the same sectors. Correlation and the mixed-portfolio figures use monthly returns.
- Upside and downside capture follow Morningstar's definition: the compound monthly return in the months the S&P 500 rose (or fell), divided by the S&P 500's compound return in those months. Beta measures how strongly monthly returns have moved with the S&P 500. All three use the same window for every investment.
- Figures are computed from daily adjusted prices and update after each trading day. Past performance does not predict future results.