Relative Intelligence · Telecommunications

How T-Mobile US (TMUS) compares with the whole market and its popular alternatives
Built by QuantCommons' quantitative engine, this page is about relative opportunity, not data on TMUS alone. It places TMUS (T-Mobile US, Inc.) against 18 popular alternatives, its neighboring categories and the entire market of over 10,000 U.S.-listed stocks and ETFs, and surfaces what has done better on consistent outperformance, return for the risk taken, behavior in real market crashes and diversification. The result is a clearer view of where TMUS stands in the market, and of the alternatives worth a closer look.
Period covered: TMUS's full trading record, from April 2007 through September 2026. The crash tests reach back to 2000 using older funds and the S&P 500. All returns include reinvested dividends. Data as of October 20, 2026.
Data as of October 20, 2026. Full tables and charts read best on a larger screen.
On this page12 sections
Key findings
- Right nowOver the past 6 months, TMUS fell 19.6% while the S&P 500 rose 9.1%. The slide is TMUS's own: it is 40.5% below its high, against 1.3% for the S&P 500. At a glance ↓
- Stock or market?The weakness is TMUS's own: it fell 18.9% over the past 3 months while the telecommunications ETF IYZ (iShares U.S. Telecommunications ETF) fell 1.4%. The S&P 500 rose 3.9%. Its telecommunication peers did not move as one over the past 3 months: T (AT&T) rose 8.0%, while LUMN (Lumen Technologies) fell 29.8%.
- Past 1 to 3 yearsTMUS has gone against the market, falling 30.0% over the past year while the S&P 500 rose 15.8%. The same gap shows up over 3 years (21.1% against 89.3%). TMUS led its telecommunication peers in 2023, then fell behind VZ (Verizon Communications) and T (AT&T) in 2025. By year ↓
- Long termTMUS turned $10,000 into $35,300 over the past decade, against $42,100 in the S&P 500. On the flip side, it outpaced every one of its telecommunication peers over the past decade, including VZ (Verizon Communications) and T (AT&T). Growth of $10,000 ↓
- In a crashAcross six sell-offs, TMUS has typically fallen 1.3 times as far as the S&P 500. On the flip side, in the 2022 bear market, TMUS fell 12.1%, against 24.5% for the S&P 500, and less than telecommunication peers such as VZ (Verizon Communications, 33.2%). Crash tests ↓
- DiversificationAgainst the S&P 500, TMUS has a correlation of 0.23 over 5 years, less closely than 81% of stocks worth at least $300 million. Next to an index fund it is a real diversifier. Over 10 years TMUS kept more of the market's gains than of its losses: 63% of the S&P 500's gains in rising months and 37% of its losses in falling ones, with a beta of 0.46. Market capture ↓
- Better options
- Popular alternatives
- KT earned more than TMUS with less volatility over the past 5 years: 13.1% a year at 22.6% volatility, against 6.4% a year at 26.1%.
- Nearby categories and themes
- MSI (Motorola Solutions, communications equipment) and CHT (Chunghwa Telecom, integrated telecommunications) earned more than TMUS with less volatility over the past 5 years. MSI returned 14.8% a year at 23.6% volatility, against 6.4% a year at 26.1%.
- Whole market
- 601 of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than TMUS with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them VTI (Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF), VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) and BRK-B (Berkshire Hathaway).
How much would $10,000 in TMUS have grown?
This chart tracks a hypothetical $10,000 investment in TMUS over the past 19 years, with dividends reinvested, alongside the same amount in the S&P 500, investments that ended ahead of TMUS over the same span and TMUS's popular alternatives, among those that traded for the entire period. A second view covers the past 5 years, the period the better options further down the page are judged on. It shows not only where each investment ended up but also how smooth or uneven the path was.
Note: TMUS began trading on April 19, 2007, so the chart cannot reach back to the dot-com bust. It covers the most recent 19 years of TMUS's record, starting at the end of September 2007.
- $10,000 invested in TMUS at the end of September 2007 would have grown to $31,439 by September 2026, less than the $70,725 it would have become in SPY, an S&P 500 fund.
- Five of the eight other investments on the chart ended ahead of TMUS, and MSI finished highest, at $79,693.
Choose a period
From the end of September 2007 to the end of September 2026. The scale is logarithmic, so equal steps up the chart are equal percentage gains. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 1,100 of the 1,798 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of TMUS; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- MSI$79,693+697% total · +11.5% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$70,725+607% total · +10.8% a year
- AMT$52,973+430% total · +9.2% a year
- CSCO$50,671+407% total · +8.9% a year
- SBAC$50,114+401% total · +8.9% a year
- CHT$45,026+350% total · +8.2% a year
- TMUS$31,439+214% total · +6.2% a year
- SKM$28,639+186% total · +5.7% a year
- KT$15,713+57.1% total · +2.4% a year
- AMX$10,422+4.2% total · +0.2% a year
From the end of September 2021 to the end of September 2026. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 1,881 of the 3,628 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of TMUS; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- TDS$26,192+162% total · +21.2% a year
- NOK$21,125+111% total · +16.1% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$19,000+90.0% total · +13.7% a year
- KT$18,344+83.4% total · +12.9% a year
- T$16,172+61.7% total · +10.1% a year
- SKM$15,352+53.5% total · +9.0% a year
- VOD$14,926+49.3% total · +8.3% a year
- AMX$13,931+39.3% total · +6.9% a year
- TMUS$13,426+34.3% total · +6.1% a year
- ERIC$9,892−1.1% total · −0.2% a year
TMUS at a glance
This section summarizes the key facts about the stock, its returns over periods from one to ten years and the risk it has carried, with dividends reinvested throughout. These figures serve as the baseline for every comparison that follows.
Note: TMUS began trading on April 19, 2007, so every figure here, including its worst decline, covers only the time since then. None of them reflect the dot-com bust.
- TMUS is still 40.5% below its all-time high.
- TMUS's deepest decline since it began trading in 2007 was 86.3%, from July 2007 to January 2010. It took about ten years from the low to climb back to its old high.
- Over 18 full calendar years, TMUS's best was 2020, when it returned 72.0%, and its worst was 2009, when it lost 48.6%. It lost money in six of those years.
The company
- Market value
- $169B
- Industry
- Telecommunications Services
- Price history from
- April 2007
Returns
- Past 1 year
- −30.0%total return
- Past 3 years
- +21.1%+6.6% a year
- Past 5 years
- +36.1%+6.4% a year
- Past 10 years
- +253%+13.4% a year
- Best calendar year
- +72.0%2020
- Worst calendar year
- −48.6%2009
- Losing years
- 6 of 18full calendar years
Risk
- Volatility
- 26.1%typical yearly swing, 5 years
- Sharpe ratio
- 0.37return per unit of risk, 5 years
- Worst decline ever
- −86.3%Jul 2007 to Jan 2010
- From its all-time high
- −40.5%below the peak
TMUS against the whole market
Where TMUS ranks among every stock and fund, and what across the market has done better.
How does TMUS rank among all stocks?
This section ranks TMUS on return, volatility, risk-adjusted return and worst decline against every stock worth at least $300 million with enough history. Where the comparisons with its popular alternatives show how TMUS stacks up against its peers, these rankings show where it stands in the market as a whole.
- TMUS's worst decline of the past 10 years ranks in the top 12% of the 2,187 stocks worth at least $300 million, where the top fell the least.
- TMUS's 1-year return ranks in the bottom 13% of the 3,287 stocks worth at least $300 million with 1 year of history.
Ranked against U.S.-listed stocks worth at least $300M that have enough history for each measure, so the count changes from row to row; smaller stocks are left out. Lower volatility and smaller declines rank higher.
| Measure | TMUS | Rank | Standing |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | −30.0% | 2,855 of 3,287 | bottom 14% |
| 3-year return | +21.1% | 2,004 of 3,017 | bottom 35% |
| 5-year return | +36.1% | 1,261 of 2,893 | top 44% |
| 10-year return | +253% | 704 of 2,202 | top 32% |
| Volatility, 5 years | 26.1% | 414 of 2,893 | top 14% |
| Sharpe ratio, 5 years | 0.37 | 1,329 of 2,893 | top 46% |
| Worst decline, past 10 years | −44.0% | 260 of 2,187 | top 12% |
What has beaten TMUS on both return and risk?
Each dot is an investment, placed by how much it earned a year over the past 5 years (higher is better) and how much its price swung, its volatility (further left is calmer). TMUS sits where the dashed lines cross. Anything in the green box above and to the left earned more than TMUS with smaller swings, a better trade-off over this period on both counts. Past results are no promise, but a name in the box is worth a closer look.
- 125 stocks and 476 ETFs worth at least $500 million sit in the green region: each earned more than TMUS over the past 5 years with smaller price swings. That is 17% of the 3,633 screened.
- Among those with at least half TMUS's swings, CAH has the best return for its risk: 42.1% a year at 24.7% volatility, 5% less than TMUS's 26.1%, and a Sharpe ratio (return above cash per unit of volatility) of 1.55 against 0.37 for TMUS.
- Among TMUS's popular alternatives, KT is in the region. KT earned 13.1% a year against 6.4% a year for TMUS, at 22.6% volatility, 13% less than TMUS's 26.1%.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested, and volatility the annualized swing in daily prices, both over 5 years. Labeled dots are the strongest picks from the table below and the names called out above, colored by how close they sit to TMUS; faint dots are 91 more of the 601 in the green region (the strongest, one per fund family). 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million were screened. Hover over a dot for its figures.
- Popular alternatives
- Same and neighboring categories, and shared themes
- The whole market
- Others in the green region
Is there a better investment than TMUS?
Investments that beat TMUS over the past 5 years on return, volatility, drawdowns, consistency, crash losses or fees, from its popular alternatives out to the whole market.
- Among TMUS's popular alternatives, KT earned more than TMUS with less volatility over the past 5 years: 13.1% a year at 22.6% volatility, against 6.4% a year at 26.1%.
- Looking beyond its popular alternatives, MSI (communications equipment) and CHT (integrated telecommunications) earned more than TMUS with less volatility over the past 5 years. MSI returned 14.8% a year at 23.6% volatility, against 6.4% a year at 26.1%.
- Across the whole market, 601 of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than TMUS with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them VTI, VOO and BRK-B.
How this works
The table below lists investments that beat TMUS over the past 5 years on at least one of these measures: a higher annual return with lower volatility, a higher annual return at similar volatility, a similar return with lower volatility, a higher Sharpe ratio with a smaller worst decline, a higher total return in most periods from 3 months to 10 years, or smaller losses in recent market crashes. It checks TMUS's popular alternatives first, then the rest of its own and neighboring categories, then every stock and fund worth at least $500 million, and shows the strongest few in each group. The full list of those with a higher return and lower volatility than TMUS follows the table.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested. Annual return, volatility and the Sharpe ratio cover 5 years; the worst decline covers the past 10 years. Green marks a better figure than TMUS's. "On the frontier" means no other option shown or tested earned more with less volatility. Funds that hold the same thing are shown once. Beyond the popular alternatives, nothing with more than 1.5× TMUS's volatility counts as better.
These figures cover the past 5 years. Green marks a better figure than TMUS's.
| Investment | Why it is better | Past 5 years | Downside | Long run | Fit | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Annual return?higher is better | Volatility?lower is calmer | Sharpe?return per unit of risk | Worst decline?past 10 years | 10Y returntotal | Corr. with TMUS?lower diversifies more | Expenseper year | |||
| +6.4% | 26.1% | 0.37 | −44.0% | +253% | 1.00 | — | |||
| +12.7% | 17.1% | 0.79 | −33.7% | +321% | 0.23 | 0.09% | |||
| Popular alternativesbest 6 shownThe investments people most often weigh against TMUS. 7 of 18 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
KTKT Corporation · Integrated Telecommunications | Higher return, lower volatilityHigher return in most periods | +13.1% | 22.6% | 0.66 | −60.3% | +84.9% | 0.47 | — | |
| Higher return, similar volatilityHigher return in most periods | +9.8% | 25.2% | 0.50 | −39.4% | +60.7% | 0.61 | — | ||
| Higher return in most periods | +8.5% | 25.8% | 0.45 | −44.4% | +149% | 0.22 | — | ||
| Higher return in most periods | +11.6% | 40.1% | 0.47 | −62.6% | +123% | -0.07 | — | ||
| Higher return in most periods | +7.7% | 28.2% | 0.41 | −62.2% | +9.3% | 0.24 | — | ||
SKMSK Telecom Co.,Ltd · Telecommunications | Higher return in most periods | +8.8% | 30.0% | 0.43 | −46.0% | +152% | 0.21 | — | |
| Same and neighboring categories, and shared themesbest 6 shownEverything else in Telecommunications and the categories next to it (Integrated Telecommunications, Communications Equipment), plus TMUS's specific themes. 7 of 26 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +14.8% | 23.6% | 0.71 | −32.8% | +625% | 0.47 | — | ||
CHTChunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. · Integrated Telecommunications | Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +7.7% | 13.3% | 0.63 | −23.8% | +101% | 0.05 | — | |
| Higher return, similar volatilityHigher return in most periods | +16.8% | 26.1% | 0.73 | −42.0% | +374% | 0.14 | — | ||
IDCCInterDigital, Inc. · Intellectual Property Licensing · 5G Networks theme | Higher return in most periods | +39.0% | 36.9% | 1.08 | −64.9% | +395% | 0.38 | — | |
VIVTelefônica Brasil S.A. · Integrated Telecommunications | Higher return in most periods | +15.3% | 28.8% | 0.64 | −56.6% | +33.3% | 0.15 | — | |
TIMBTIM S.A. · Telecommunications | Higher return in most periods | +18.2% | 31.6% | 0.69 | −52.6% | +112% | 0.14 | — | |
| The whole marketbest 8 shownEvery other stock and fund worth at least $500 million. 1,338 of 3,589 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +11.5% | 17.5% | 0.71 | −35.0% | +302% | 0.25 | 0.03% | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +12.8% | 16.9% | 0.80 | −34.0% | +324% | 0.23 | 0.03% | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +20.8% | 22.6% | 0.96 | −25.7% | +508% | 0.23 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +13.4% | 17.1% | 0.82 | −29.6% | +274% | 0.44 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +12.7% | 17.9% | 0.76 | −27.4% | +196% | 0.23 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +12.8% | 22.9% | 0.64 | −36.4% | +429% | 0.45 | — | ||
| Higher return, similar volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +18.5% | 28.0% | 0.75 | −38.5% | +1,168% | 0.18 | — | ||
HYGHiShares Interest Rate Hedged High Yield Bond ETF · Bonds | On the frontierSimilar return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +6.6% | 7.1% | 0.94 | −23.9% | +74.5% | 0.31 | 1.12% | |
What these numbers mean for TMUS
- Annual return
- TMUS returned 6.4% a year over the past 5 years with dividends reinvested, against 12.7% a year for the S&P 500. At that pace, $10,000 became about $13,600. Annual return is the steady yearly rate that would produce the same total result, so investments held over the same span compare fairly. Guide: What is performance and return? →
- Volatility
- TMUS's volatility over the past 5 years was 26.1%, 1.5 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, TMUS's return lands within 26.1% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump. Guide: Understanding and measuring risk (volatility) →
- Sharpe ratio
- TMUS's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.37, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so TMUS earned less for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings. Guide: Balancing reward with risk (Sharpe ratio) →
- Worst decline
- TMUS's worst fall from a peak to a low over the past 10 years was 44.0%, against 33.7% for the S&P 500. Losses and gains are not symmetric: climbing back from a 44.0% fall takes a 78.5% gain. Guide: Market crash risk and tail risk →
- Correlation
- Over the past 5 years, TMUS's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.23 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They are only loosely linked, which makes it a real diversifier next to an index fund. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against TMUS instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a TMUS holding. Guide: Correlation and diversification →
Show all 601 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that earned more than TMUS with less volatility
Out of 3,633 tested over 5 years. The strongest 100 are listed, best first, with funds that hold the same thing listed once.
| # | Investment | Found in | Annual return | Volatility | Sharpe | Worst decline | 10Y return | Corr. with TMUS | Expense |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Whole market | +11.5% | 17.5% | 0.71 | −35.0% | +302% | 0.25 | 0.03% | |
| 2 | Whole market | +12.8% | 16.9% | 0.80 | −34.0% | +324% | 0.23 | 0.03% | |
| 3 | Whole market | +20.8% | 22.6% | 0.96 | −25.7% | +508% | 0.23 | — | |
| 4 | Whole market | +13.4% | 17.1% | 0.82 | −29.6% | +274% | 0.44 | — | |
| 5 | Whole market | +12.7% | 17.9% | 0.76 | −27.4% | +196% | 0.23 | — | |
| 6 | Whole market | +12.8% | 22.9% | 0.64 | −36.4% | +429% | 0.45 | — | |
| 7 | LVHIFranklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +17.0% | 11.1% | 1.48 | −32.4% | +194% | 0.36 | 0.40% |
| 8 | Whole market | +14.7% | 16.8% | 0.91 | −37.0% | +204% | 0.28 | — | |
| 9 | Whole market | +17.4% | 22.9% | 0.82 | −31.4% | +685% | 0.44 | — | |
| 10 | Whole market | +8.2% | 16.4% | 0.57 | −36.0% | +140% | 0.24 | 0.05% | |
| 11 | Whole market | +14.5% | 23.0% | 0.71 | −35.1% | +553% | 0.04 | 0.18% | |
| 12 | Whole market | +17.1% | 20.7% | 0.87 | −26.8% | +226% | 0.36 | — | |
| 13 | Whole market | +12.1% | 13.7% | 0.90 | −36.8% | +235% | 0.42 | 0.03% | |
| 14 | Whole market | +9.3% | 16.9% | 0.61 | −35.8% | +153% | 0.28 | 0.03% | |
| 15 | Whole market | +17.7% | 18.9% | 0.96 | −26.4% | +213% | 0.25 | 0.40% | |
| 16 | Whole market | +11.5% | 20.9% | 0.63 | −32.6% | +394% | 0.32 | — | |
| 17 | Whole market | +10.4% | 14.1% | 0.78 | −31.7% | +258% | 0.34 | 0.04% | |
| 18 | Whole market | +24.2% | 22.8% | 1.07 | −32.4% | +406% | 0.35 | — | |
| 19 | Whole market | +9.7% | 14.3% | 0.72 | −33.4% | +252% | 0.52 | 0.06% | |
| 20 | Whole market | +11.1% | 24.2% | 0.56 | −36.7% | +204% | 0.24 | — | |
| 21 | Whole market | +10.3% | 16.2% | 0.69 | −34.2% | +223% | 0.26 | 0.06% | |
| 22 | Whole market | +11.3% | 18.8% | 0.67 | −38.4% | +170% | 0.29 | — | |
| 23 | Whole market | +11.2% | 20.8% | 0.62 | −37.4% | +319% | 0.31 | — | |
| 24 | Whole market | +13.9% | 18.5% | 0.80 | −34.0% | +446% | 0.35 | — | |
| 25 | PJULInnovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +10.5% | 8.6% | 1.20 | −18.2% | — | 0.27 | 0.79% |
| 26 | Whole market | +9.3% | 19.2% | 0.56 | −30.1% | +344% | 0.38 | — | |
| 27 | Whole market | +9.5% | 24.5% | 0.49 | −37.6% | +95.1% | 0.13 | — | |
| 28 | FJANFT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - January · Multi-Asset | Whole market | +11.1% | 10.5% | 1.05 | −13.6% | — | 0.19 | 0.85% |
| 29 | Whole market | +7.5% | 18.0% | 0.50 | −37.4% | +132% | 0.40 | — | |
| 30 | Whole market | +12.4% | 20.2% | 0.68 | −32.9% | +185% | 0.31 | — | |
| 31 | Whole market | +15.8% | 24.6% | 0.72 | −30.7% | +576% | 0.31 | — | |
| 32 | Whole market | +13.1% | 22.4% | 0.67 | −34.5% | +451% | 0.10 | 0.04% | |
| 33 | Whole market | +14.7% | 17.5% | 0.87 | −34.7% | — | 0.22 | 0.26% | |
| 34 | Whole market | +7.5% | 11.0% | 0.71 | −13.7% | — | 0.45 | 0.35% | |
| 35 | Whole market | +12.0% | 18.8% | 0.70 | −30.9% | +114% | 0.37 | — | |
| 36 | Whole market | +8.4% | 15.3% | 0.60 | −28.4% | +202% | 0.33 | 0.08% | |
| 37 | Whole market | +8.9% | 24.7% | 0.47 | −38.3% | +407% | 0.33 | — | |
| 38 | ATOAtmos Energy Corporation · Gas Utilities | Whole market | +14.9% | 18.4% | 0.85 | −32.9% | +194% | 0.48 | — |
| 39 | SPMOInvesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF · US Momentum Equity | Whole market | +18.7% | 20.8% | 0.93 | −30.9% | +499% | 0.11 | 0.13% |
| 40 | DFIVDimensional - International Value ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +14.8% | 16.4% | 0.93 | −25.4% | — | 0.32 | 0.27% |
| 41 | AVLVAvantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF · US Large-Cap Value | Whole market | +14.0% | 16.9% | 0.86 | −19.5% | — | 0.37 | 0.15% |
| 42 | HDViShares Core High Dividend ETF · US Dividend Equity | Whole market | +12.9% | 13.0% | 1.00 | −37.0% | +172% | 0.54 | 0.08% |
| 43 | NINiSource Inc · Gas Utilities | Whole market | +15.1% | 20.3% | 0.80 | −30.9% | +158% | 0.42 | — |
| 44 | DFATDimensional - US Targeted Value ETF · US Small-Cap Equity | Whole market | +9.6% | 21.0% | 0.54 | −26.1% | — | 0.38 | 0.33% |
| 45 | DGXQuest Diagnostics Incorporated · Medical Diagnostics | Whole market | +12.3% | 22.5% | 0.63 | −36.6% | +243% | 0.43 | — |
| 46 | FTSFortis Inc. · Electric Utilities | Whole market | +8.4% | 16.4% | 0.58 | −34.3% | +154% | 0.36 | — |
| 47 | USMViShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF · US Low-Volatility Equity | Whole market | +7.6% | 12.3% | 0.66 | −33.1% | +176% | 0.51 | 0.15% |
| 48 | AVEMAvantis Emerging Markets Equity ETF · Emerging Markets Equity | Whole market | +9.3% | 19.5% | 0.56 | −36.0% | — | 0.06 | 0.33% |
| 49 | SPHQInvesco S&P 500 Quality ETF · US Quality Equity | Whole market | +12.0% | 16.7% | 0.76 | −31.6% | +300% | 0.25 | 0.20% |
| 50 | AEEAmeren Corporation · Electric Utilities | Whole market | +7.9% | 19.4% | 0.49 | −29.1% | +192% | 0.34 | — |
| 51 | COWZPacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF · US Large-Cap Value | Whole market | +11.4% | 17.7% | 0.70 | −38.7% | — | 0.48 | 0.49% |
| 52 | EWJiShares MSCI Japan ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +9.2% | 18.8% | 0.57 | −33.1% | +132% | 0.22 | 0.49% |
| 53 | XLUState Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF · Utilities Equity | Whole market | +7.8% | 17.4% | 0.52 | −36.0% | +138% | 0.38 | 0.08% |
| 54 | SDYState Street SPDR S&P Dividend ETF · US Dividend Equity | Whole market | +7.6% | 14.0% | 0.59 | −36.7% | +157% | 0.49 | 0.35% |
| 55 | BUFRFT Vest Laddered Buffer ETF · Buffered Equity | Whole market | +9.9% | 10.5% | 0.96 | −13.7% | — | 0.26 | 0.10% |
| 56 | Whole market | +17.3% | 18.2% | 0.97 | −40.0% | +352% | 0.13 | — | |
| 57 | RWLInvesco S&P 500 Revenue ETF · US Large-Cap Equity | Whole market | +13.7% | 14.4% | 0.97 | −36.1% | +287% | 0.40 | 0.39% |
| 58 | EVRGEvergy, Inc. · Electric Utilities | Whole market | +9.5% | 18.9% | 0.57 | −38.8% | +109% | 0.32 | — |
| 59 | DBEFXtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +13.1% | 13.8% | 0.96 | −32.5% | +206% | 0.26 | 0.35% |
| 60 | IOOiShares Global 100 ETF · Global Equity | Whole market | +15.7% | 17.2% | 0.94 | −31.4% | +361% | 0.16 | 0.40% |
| 61 | JQUAJPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF · US Quality Equity | Whole market | +13.6% | 15.7% | 0.89 | −32.9% | — | 0.30 | 0.12% |
| 62 | DIVOAmplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF · Equity Income | Whole market | +11.1% | 11.9% | 0.95 | −30.0% | — | 0.41 | 0.56% |
| 63 | MOATVanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF · US Large-Cap Equity | Whole market | +9.1% | 18.4% | 0.57 | −33.3% | +276% | 0.35 | 0.46% |
| 64 | Whole market | +42.1% | 24.7% | 1.55 | −46.1% | +349% | 0.16 | — | |
| 65 | Same or nearby category | +14.8% | 23.6% | 0.71 | −32.8% | +625% | 0.47 | — | |
| 66 | ACTEnact Holdings Inc. · Insurance | Whole market | +20.5% | 24.3% | 0.89 | −20.2% | — | 0.28 | — |
| 67 | VDCVanguard Consumer Staples ETF · Consumer Staples Equity | Whole market | +7.8% | 13.6% | 0.62 | −25.3% | +128% | 0.45 | 0.09% |
| 68 | QYLDGlobal X - Nasdaq 100 Covered Call ETF · Equity Income | Whole market | +8.4% | 15.0% | 0.62 | −24.7% | +156% | 0.06 | 0.60% |
| 69 | BBEUJPMorgan BetaBuilders Europe ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +8.9% | 17.5% | 0.57 | −36.3% | — | 0.27 | 0.09% |
| 70 | FLTWFranklin FTSE Taiwan ETF · Technology | Whole market | +21.8% | 24.3% | 0.94 | −38.0% | — | -0.04 | 0.19% |
| 71 | DBMFiMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF · Alternatives | Whole market | +9.8% | 12.4% | 0.82 | −20.4% | — | -0.20 | 0.85% |
| 72 | USMCPrincipal U.S. Mega-Cap ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +14.1% | 16.4% | 0.89 | −30.0% | — | 0.19 | 0.12% |
| 73 | GCOWPacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF · International | Whole market | +14.1% | 13.6% | 1.04 | −37.6% | +168% | 0.45 | 0.60% |
| 74 | IDAIDACORP, Inc. · Electric Utilities | Whole market | +8.8% | 19.2% | 0.54 | −34.3% | +141% | 0.40 | — |
| 75 | XMMOInvesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF · US Mid-Cap Equity | Whole market | +10.5% | 22.0% | 0.56 | −36.7% | +390% | 0.29 | 0.34% |
| 76 | CHTChunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. · Integrated Telecommunications | Same or nearby category | +7.7% | 13.3% | 0.63 | −23.8% | +101% | 0.05 | — |
| 77 | TDIVFirst Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund · Technology Equity | Whole market | +16.2% | 21.3% | 0.81 | −32.0% | +388% | 0.16 | 0.50% |
| 78 | Whole market | +23.5% | 18.8% | 1.22 | −75.2% | +350% | 0.45 | — | |
| 79 | IWXiShares Russell Top 200 Value ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +12.7% | 13.8% | 0.94 | −35.8% | +221% | 0.39 | 0.20% |
| 80 | IDMOInvesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +13.3% | 18.2% | 0.78 | −31.3% | +229% | 0.26 | 0.25% |
| 81 | FTGCFirst Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund · Alternatives | Whole market | +12.9% | 15.6% | 0.86 | −35.9% | +139% | 0.13 | 0.98% |
| 82 | FTLSFirst Trust Long/Short Equity ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +10.2% | 10.4% | 0.99 | −20.6% | +158% | 0.25 | 0.95% |
| 83 | OMFLInvesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF · US Multifactor Equity | Whole market | +9.0% | 16.4% | 0.61 | −33.2% | — | 0.29 | 0.29% |
| 84 | PTLCPacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +9.5% | 11.8% | 0.83 | −26.6% | +188% | 0.11 | 0.60% |
| 85 | SPUSSP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF · Technology | Whole market | +15.0% | 19.5% | 0.82 | −30.8% | — | 0.08 | 0.45% |
| 86 | DEMWisdomTree Emerging Markets High Dividend Fund · International Equity | Whole market | +9.6% | 15.5% | 0.67 | −37.8% | +133% | 0.15 | 0.63% |
| 87 | DIVIFranklin International Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF · International | Whole market | +13.4% | 15.5% | 0.89 | −27.7% | +184% | 0.28 | 0.09% |
| 88 | XYLDGlobal X - S&P 500 Covered Call ETF · International | Whole market | +7.4% | 11.2% | 0.70 | −33.4% | +128% | 0.19 | 0.60% |
| 89 | EQWLInvesco S&P 100 Equal Weight ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +11.6% | 15.0% | 0.81 | −34.3% | +291% | 0.38 | 0.30% |
| 90 | HDEFXtrackers MSCI EAFE High Dividend Yield Equity ETF · International | Whole market | +12.8% | 14.2% | 0.92 | −36.4% | +134% | 0.34 | 0.09% |
| 91 | AOAiShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF · Multi-Asset | Whole market | +8.6% | 13.1% | 0.69 | −28.4% | +165% | 0.27 | 0.19% |
| 92 | DIVBiShares Core Dividend ETF · Dividend & Income | Whole market | +13.9% | 15.4% | 0.93 | −36.9% | — | 0.42 | 0.05% |
| 93 | ACIOAptus Collared Income Opportunity ETF · Dividend & Income | Whole market | +9.3% | 11.1% | 0.86 | −14.2% | — | 0.24 | 0.79% |
| 94 | FTHIFirst Trust BuyWrite Income ETF · Dividend & Income | Whole market | +10.3% | 13.3% | 0.81 | −32.7% | +126% | 0.33 | 0.75% |
| 95 | FLQLFranklin U.S. Large Cap Multifactor Index ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +13.8% | 16.3% | 0.88 | −33.6% | — | 0.24 | 0.15% |
| 96 | JMOMJPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +12.9% | 19.1% | 0.73 | −34.3% | — | 0.19 | 0.12% |
| 97 | HFXINYLI FTSE International Equity Currency Neutral ETF · International | Whole market | +11.4% | 15.3% | 0.79 | −32.4% | +180% | 0.24 | 0.19% |
| 98 | NULGNuveen ESG Large-Cap Growth · Broad Market | Whole market | +11.4% | 21.9% | 0.60 | −36.2% | — | 0.11 | 0.26% |
| 99 | GLTRabrdn Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF · Alternatives | Whole market | +14.9% | 24.6% | 0.69 | −37.9% | +191% | 0.20 | 0.60% |
| 100 | FBTFirst Trust NYSE Arca Biotechnology Index Fund · Healthcare | Whole market | +10.8% | 22.2% | 0.58 | −33.3% | +203% | 0.17 | 0.55% |
TMUS against its popular alternatives
The investments people most often weigh against TMUS, compared period by period and year by year.
How do TMUS's risk and return compare with its alternatives?
This map plots each investment's annual return over the past 5 years against its volatility, the size of its typical price swings. Investments toward the upper left earned more for a smoother ride, and those toward the lower right earned less for a rougher one. The dashed lines cross at TMUS, which divides the map into what did better or worse on each measure.
- KT, T and AMX were both more rewarding and calmer than TMUS over the past 5 years, earning a higher annual return with lower volatility.
- Over the past 5 years, TMUS returned 6.4% a year, less than the S&P 500's 12.7%, with higher volatility (26.1% against 17.1%).
Green points earned more than TMUS with less volatility; red points earned less with more. Hover over a point for its figures. Total returns with dividends reinvested, annualized.
All figures
| Investment | Annual return | Volatility |
|---|---|---|
| TDS Telephone and Data Systems, Inc. | +21.1% | 64.5% |
| KT KT Corporation | +13.1% | 22.6% |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | +12.7% | 17.1% |
| NOK Nokia Oyj | +11.6% | 40.1% |
| T AT&T Inc. | +9.8% | 25.2% |
| SKM SK Telecom Co.,Ltd | +8.8% | 30.0% |
| AMX América Móvil, S.A.B. de C.V. | +8.5% | 25.8% |
| VOD Vodafone Group Public Limited Company | +7.7% | 28.2% |
| TMUS This pageT-Mobile US, Inc. | +6.4% | 26.1% |
| VZ Verizon Communications Inc. | +2.7% | 22.9% |
| ERIC Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ) | +1.7% | 35.7% |
| RCI Rogers Communications Inc. | −4.8% | 23.4% |
| AMT American Tower Corporation | −4.8% | 27.3% |
| CCI Crown Castle Inc. | −9.9% | 28.3% |
| SBAC SBA Communications Corporation | −10.2% | 30.3% |
| BCE BCE Inc. | −11.3% | 20.0% |
| TU TELUS Corporation | −12.3% | 20.3% |
| CMCSA Comcast Corporation | −13.5% | 27.7% |
| LUMN Lumen Technologies, Inc. | −17.4% | 86.3% |
| CHTR Charter Communications, Inc. | −31.6% | 41.3% |
Has TMUS consistently beaten its popular alternatives?
This section compares TMUS with the investments people most often weigh against it, checking each one over eight periods from one month to ten years. Counting how often an alternative earned more than TMUS helps separate lasting outperformance from a single strong stretch.
- Seven of the 18 popular alternatives, led by AMX, KT and SKM, outperformed TMUS in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes.
- T earned more for the risk it took than TMUS (a higher Sharpe ratio) and fell less in its worst decline of the past 10 years.
A green cell means the alternative earned more than TMUS over that period. "Qualified" marks those that did so in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods.
| Investment | Periods outperformed | Short term | Long term | Risk · 5 years | Fund | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1M | 3M | 6M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | 10Y | Volatilitylower is calmer | Sharpehigher is better | Worst declinepast 10 years | Expense | Assets | Overlapsame sectors | ||
| TMUS T-Mobile US, Inc. (this page) | — | −4.5% | −18.9% | −19.6% | −19.7% | −30.0% | +21.1% | +36.1% | +253% | 26.1% | 0.37 | −44.0% | — | $169B | — |
| AMX QualifiedAmérica Móvil, S.A.B. de C.V. | 5/5 short2/3 long | +2.0% | −12.3% | −11.8% | +12.1% | +5.0% | +48.3% | +50.5% | +149% | 25.8% | 0.45 | −44.4% | — | $68B | — |
| KT QualifiedKT Corporation | 5/5 short2/3 long | −3.5% | +5.9% | −12.7% | +1.5% | +1.5% | +82.9% | +84.9% | +84.9% | 22.6% | 0.66 | −60.3% | — | $9.1B | — |
| SKM QualifiedSK Telecom Co.,Ltd | 4/5 short2/3 long | −9.6% | +3.6% | −13.9% | +59.8% | +52.7% | +79.8% | +52.4% | +152% | 30.0% | 0.43 | −46.0% | — | $12B | — |
| NOK QualifiedNokia Oyj | 4/5 short2/3 long | −17.5% | −10.2% | −14.3% | +40.3% | +60.8% | +211% | +72.8% | +123% | 40.1% | 0.47 | −62.6% | — | $49B | — |
| T QualifiedAT&T Inc. | 4/5 short2/3 long | −6.8% | +8.0% | −8.2% | 0.0% | −5.9% | +77.2% | +59.7% | +60.7% | 25.2% | 0.50 | −39.4% | — | $161B | — |
| VOD QualifiedVodafone Group Public Limited Company | 4/5 short2/3 long | −6.7% | +3.1% | +3.4% | +21.3% | +41.9% | +109% | +44.9% | +9.3% | 28.2% | 0.41 | −62.2% | — | $37B | — |
| TDS QualifiedTelephone and Data Systems, Inc. | 3/5 short2/3 long | −7.2% | +0.9% | −24.8% | +8.5% | +15.0% | +156% | +161% | +119% | 64.5% | 0.57 | −79.0% | — | $3.7B | — |
| ERIC Communication EquipmentTelefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ) | 5/5 short1/3 long | +5.5% | +12.9% | −8.0% | +15.6% | +15.6% | +164% | +8.9% | +161% | 35.7% | 0.23 | −66.6% | — | $36B | — |
| AMT REIT - SpecialtyAmerican Tower Corporation | 5/5 short1/3 long | +6.3% | +11.1% | +3.1% | +8.2% | −1.1% | +27.5% | −21.8% | +107% | 27.3% | -0.04 | −45.4% | — | $86B | — |
| VZ Telecommunications ServicesVerizon Communications Inc. | 4/5 short1/3 long | −5.1% | +4.0% | −1.0% | +17.2% | +16.4% | +71.5% | +14.4% | +55.8% | 22.9% | 0.23 | −41.2% | — | $185B | — |
| LUMN Telecommunications ServicesLumen Technologies, Inc. | 0/5 short1/3 long | −30.6% | −29.8% | −48.3% | −41.7% | −37.4% | +222% | −61.5% | −71.8% | 86.3% | 0.17 | −94.4% | — | $4.6B | — |
| SBAC REIT - SpecialtySBA Communications Corporation | 5/5 short0/3 long | +2.7% | +0.1% | −16.8% | −4.1% | −6.2% | +0.4% | −41.5% | +79.2% | 30.3% | -0.20 | −55.9% | — | $19B | — |
| CCI REIT - SpecialtyCrown Castle Inc. | 5/5 short0/3 long | +10.8% | +5.3% | −4.9% | −4.9% | −13.7% | +10.7% | −40.6% | +35.4% | 28.3% | -0.23 | −59.7% | — | $35B | — |
| RCI Telecommunications ServicesRogers Communications Inc. | 4/5 short0/3 long | −6.2% | −6.5% | −1.4% | −12.5% | −8.4% | −1.3% | −21.7% | +12.2% | 23.4% | -0.09 | −56.9% | — | $17B | — |
| CMCSA Telecommunications ServicesComcast Corporation | 4/5 short0/3 long | −1.0% | −4.5% | −22.6% | −14.9% | −20.3% | −41.4% | −51.6% | −9.9% | 27.7% | -0.39 | −60.3% | — | $79B | — |
| BCE Telecommunications ServicesBCE Inc. | 4/5 short0/3 long | −8.7% | −6.2% | −14.0% | −11.8% | −11.4% | −32.5% | −45.2% | −20.1% | 20.0% | -0.51 | −56.6% | — | $19B | — |
| TU Telecommunications ServicesTELUS Corporation | 2/5 short0/3 long | −2.5% | −16.5% | −28.5% | −31.3% | −38.9% | −34.4% | −48.2% | −8.4% | 20.3% | -0.55 | −61.9% | — | $13B | — |
| CHTR Telecommunications ServicesCharter Communications, Inc. | 1/5 short0/3 long | −10.8% | −14.8% | −55.0% | −47.4% | −56.3% | −74.4% | −85.0% | −57.4% | 41.3% | -0.71 | −87.5% | — | $15B | — |
How did TMUS do year by year?
This table shows each investment's total return in every full calendar year since 2008, along with where TMUS ranked among its popular alternatives each year. Annual results reveal how consistently each one kept pace with TMUS and how far its good and bad years diverged, detail that multiyear averages tend to smooth over.
Note: TMUS began trading on April 19, 2007, so the table starts with 2008, its first full calendar year, and cannot show how it fared during the dot-com bust.
- Ranked against its popular alternatives each year, TMUS finished in the top quarter in nine of 18 years and in the bottom quarter in five. In 2025, it ranked 17 of 19.
- None of the 18 popular alternatives came out ahead of TMUS in most of the years they have in common.
- TMUS finished ahead of the S&P 500 in nine of its 18 full calendar years.
Newest year first. Green marks a year in which the fund came out ahead of TMUS; gray means the two finished within a fraction of a point. The rank row places TMUS among the alternatives that traded the full year; dark green is the top quarter and red the bottom quarter.
| Investment | Years ahead of TMUS | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TMUS This pageT-Mobile US, Inc. | — | −6.6% | +39.7% | +15.0% | +20.7% | −14.0% | +72.0% | +23.3% | +0.1% | +10.4% | +47.0% | +45.2% | −19.9% | +69.2% | +14.5% | −31.3% | +65.5% | −48.6% | −23.7% |
| Rank among alternatives | Top quarter in 9 of 18 | 17 of 19 | 4 of 19 | 3 of 19 | 1 of 19 | 19 of 19 | 1 of 19 | 8 of 19 | 9 of 19 | 14 of 19 | 1 of 19 | 1 of 19 | 19 of 19 | 3 of 19 | 10 of 19 | 18 of 19 | 1 of 18 | 18 of 18 | 3 of 18 |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 9 of 18 | +17.7% | +24.9% | +26.2% | −18.2% | +28.7% | +18.3% | +31.2% | −4.6% | +21.7% | +12.0% | +1.2% | +13.5% | +32.3% | +16.0% | +1.9% | +15.1% | +26.4% | −36.8% |
| AMX América Móvil, S.A.B. de C.V. | 6 of 18 | +48.6% | −20.3% | +4.6% | −10.2% | +48.8% | −6.7% | +15.0% | −15.2% | +39.1% | −8.5% | −31.6% | −3.6% | +2.7% | +3.7% | −20.3% | +23.3% | +55.6% | −49.0% |
| KT KT Corporation | 6 of 18 | +27.8% | +20.1% | +5.0% | +13.4% | +21.0% | +0.2% | −15.3% | −8.9% | +17.8% | +21.3% | −14.1% | −5.1% | −8.9% | +7.1% | −20.2% | +30.7% | +21.0% | −41.5% |
| SKM SK Telecom Co.,Ltd | 7 of 18 | +2.5% | +2.9% | +11.5% | −17.8% | +15.2% | +10.4% | −10.4% | −0.4% | +43.7% | +8.8% | −21.8% | +13.3% | +62.3% | +17.3% | −21.8% | +20.9% | −5.0% | −36.6% |
| NOK Nokia Oyj | 6 of 18 | +50.7% | +34.6% | −23.9% | −24.4% | +59.3% | +5.2% | −34.9% | +29.7% | −0.3% | −27.8% | −8.4% | +3.0% | +105% | −11.5% | −50.3% | −16.0% | −14.5% | −58.2% |
| T AT&T Inc. | 8 of 18 | +14.0% | +44.0% | −2.8% | +6.5% | −5.9% | −19.6% | +48.5% | −20.8% | −2.4% | +32.0% | +10.3% | +2.4% | +11.6% | +19.4% | +11.1% | +14.0% | +6.9% | −26.9% |
| VOD Vodafone Group Public Limited Company | 6 of 18 | +63.6% | +5.6% | −4.6% | −27.2% | −3.5% | −9.5% | +5.6% | −34.8% | +38.1% | −20.0% | −0.9% | −8.8% | +64.3% | −4.7% | +14.3% | +21.5% | +20.0% | −42.3% |
| TDS Telephone and Data Systems, Inc. | 8 of 18 | +20.7% | +89.0% | +85.9% | −45.3% | +12.0% | −24.4% | −20.0% | +19.6% | −1.5% | +14.0% | +4.7% | +0.1% | +18.8% | −5.0% | −28.0% | +9.2% | +8.4% | −48.8% |
| ERIC Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ) | 7 of 18 | +24.0% | +33.5% | +13.2% | −44.4% | −7.2% | +38.3% | +0.1% | +35.2% | +16.7% | −36.4% | −18.1% | +2.3% | +25.5% | +3.4% | −9.5% | +28.7% | +20.9% | −30.3% |
| AMT American Tower Corporation | 9 of 18 | −0.9% | −12.2% | +5.4% | −25.7% | +32.9% | −0.5% | +47.9% | +13.3% | +37.7% | +11.2% | 0.0% | +25.8% | +4.8% | +30.4% | +16.9% | +19.5% | +47.3% | −31.2% |
| VZ Verizon Communications Inc. | 7 of 18 | +8.9% | +13.1% | +2.7% | −20.0% | −7.5% | −0.1% | +13.8% | +11.3% | +4.0% | +20.7% | +3.6% | −0.5% | +18.6% | +13.2% | +18.2% | +23.0% | +3.8% | −20.1% |
| LUMN Lumen Technologies, Inc. | 7 of 18 | +46.3% | +190% | −64.9% | −55.5% | +38.7% | −19.1% | −5.3% | +2.0% | −21.7% | +2.2% | −31.9% | +31.7% | −13.2% | +13.1% | −13.2% | +38.0% | +44.9% | −29.6% |
| SBAC SBA Communications Corporation | 8 of 18 | −3.1% | −18.2% | −8.2% | −27.3% | +39.0% | +17.8% | +49.3% | −0.9% | +58.2% | −1.7% | −5.1% | +23.3% | +26.6% | +65.2% | +4.9% | +19.9% | +109% | −51.8% |
| CCI Crown Castle Inc. | 9 of 18 | +3.0% | −16.4% | −10.2% | −32.6% | +35.1% | +15.5% | +35.4% | +1.8% | +33.0% | +4.5% | +14.4% | +9.9% | +1.8% | +61.0% | +2.2% | +12.3% | +122% | −57.8% |
| RCI Rogers Communications Inc. | 8 of 18 | +28.6% | −31.9% | +3.4% | +1.6% | +5.6% | −3.0% | −0.2% | +3.7% | +36.4% | +16.1% | −7.1% | −10.1% | +3.3% | +23.0% | +15.7% | +15.8% | +7.5% | −31.7% |
| CMCSA Comcast Corporation | 9 of 18 | −22.6% | −12.0% | +28.8% | −28.8% | −2.3% | +19.0% | +33.9% | −12.8% | +17.3% | +24.8% | −1.2% | +13.0% | +41.3% | +60.4% | +10.3% | +33.2% | +1.4% | −6.6% |
| BCE BCE Inc. | 6 of 18 | +10.2% | −35.5% | −4.2% | −10.7% | +28.6% | −2.0% | +23.9% | −12.6% | +15.0% | +17.3% | −11.6% | +11.3% | +6.1% | +8.6% | +23.8% | +35.5% | +43.3% | −47.1% |
| TU TELUS Corporation | 7 of 18 | +5.0% | −18.4% | −2.3% | −14.4% | +24.4% | +7.3% | +22.8% | −8.5% | +24.2% | +20.4% | −20.1% | +8.7% | +9.9% | +26.7% | +28.4% | +46.8% | +16.2% | −38.4% |
| CHTR Charter Communications, Inc. | 7 of 15 | −39.1% | −11.8% | +14.6% | −48.0% | −1.5% | +36.4% | +70.2% | −15.2% | +16.7% | +42.2% | +9.9% | +21.8% | +79.4% | +33.9% | +46.2% | — | — | — |
Risk and diversification
How TMUS has fallen, how it held up in crashes beside the S&P 500 and its popular alternatives, and what moves independently of it.
What were TMUS's worst declines?
A drawdown is the decline from a peak to the lowest point before a new high. This section presents TMUS's five deepest drawdowns since it began trading in 2007, alongside the S&P 500's return over the same dates, and how long each took to recover. Together, these figures show how much an investor could have lost and how long it took to get back to even.
Note: TMUS began trading on April 19, 2007, so this list cannot include the dot-com bust. The crash tests on this page show how older funds and the S&P 500 fared through those years.
- In four of TMUS's five worst declines, the S&P 500 held up better over the same dates.
- Not every decline was the market's doing: TMUS fell 44.0% from March 2025 to October 2026, while the S&P 500 rose 36.0%.
- The slowest recovery came after TMUS fell 86.3% from July 2007 to January 2010; it did not regain that peak until July 2019, ten years later.
Green means TMUS fell less than the S&P 500 over the same dates. Based on daily closing prices with dividends reinvested.
| During | TMUS fell | S&P 500, same dates | Peak | Low | Time to the low | Back at the peak | Time to recover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 financial crisis | −86.3% | −25.8% | Jul 2007 | Jan 2010 | 2.5 years | Jul 2019 | 9.5 years |
| No named crash | −44.0% | +36.0% | Mar 2025 | Oct 2026 | 19 months | Not yet | — |
| 2022 bear market | −32.0% | +2.2% | Jul 2021 | Jan 2022 | 6 months | Oct 2022 | 9 months |
| Covid crash | −26.0% | −29.1% | Feb 2020 | Mar 2020 | 1 month | May 2020 | 2 months |
| 2023 regional bank crisis | −17.0% | +5.7% | Dec 2022 | Jun 2023 | 6 months | Dec 2023 | 6 months |
How did TMUS do in stock market crashes?
This section measures how far TMUS, the S&P 500 and each alternative fell from peak to trough during every major market crash since 2000. A smaller decline means an investment held up better, and comparing results across crashes shows whether that resilience was consistent or a one-off.
Note: TMUS began trading on April 19, 2007, so its row reads "Not yet trading" for the dot-com bust. The older alternatives and the S&P 500 show how those crashes played out.
- Among its popular alternatives, T held up best, falling less than TMUS in six of the nine crashes they both traded through.
- TMUS began trading after the dot-com bust, but 16 of its popular alternatives lived through it. The mildest fall among them was LUMN's 43.7%, against 47.5% for the S&P 500.
- TMUS fell further than the S&P 500 in five of the nine crashes it has traded through. The clearest case was the 2011 euro debt crisis, when TMUS fell 52.5% and the S&P 500 fell 17.9%.
Newest crash first. Each figure is the fund's deepest fall within the crash window; green means a smaller fall than TMUS.
| Investment | Held up better | 2023 regional bank crisisMar 2023 | 2022 bear marketJan 2022 | Covid crashFeb 2020 | Late-2018 sell-offSep 2018 | February 2018 volatility shockFeb 2018 | 2015 China and oil sell-offAug 2015 | 2011 euro debt crisisJul 2011 | 2010 flash crashMay 2010 | 2008 financial crisisOct 2007 | Dot-com bustMar 2000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TMUS This pageT-Mobile US, Inc. | — | −2.6% | −12.1% | −26.0% | −13.7% | −7.4% | −21.2% | −52.5% | −11.3% | −57.5% | Not yet trading |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 5 of 9 | −3.4% | −24.5% | −33.7% | −19.3% | −6.5% | −12.8% | −17.9% | −1.5% | −55.2% | −47.5% |
| AMX América Móvil, S.A.B. de C.V. | 3 of 9 | −2.8% | −24.8% | −36.3% | −24.9% | −6.3% | −33.5% | −18.8% | 0.0% | −65.4% | — |
| KT KT Corporation | 5 of 9 | −2.0% | −22.9% | −36.1% | −7.9% | −11.5% | −20.0% | −27.1% | −1.8% | −64.2% | −68.0% |
| SKM SK Telecom Co.,Ltd | 4 of 9 | −0.9% | −30.1% | −31.3% | −8.2% | −8.9% | −26.7% | −16.5% | −2.0% | −60.4% | −70.0% |
| NOK Nokia Oyj | 4 of 9 | −2.1% | −32.1% | −42.4% | −9.7% | −2.8% | −23.3% | −21.1% | 0.0% | −78.1% | −82.1% |
| T AT&T Inc. | 6 of 9 | −1.6% | −29.2% | −30.6% | −18.3% | −6.5% | −8.6% | −9.1% | −0.3% | −44.4% | −63.5% |
| VOD Vodafone Group Public Limited Company | 3 of 9 | −1.7% | −39.7% | −42.2% | −18.5% | −8.5% | −21.9% | −12.9% | −2.8% | −59.0% | −79.1% |
| TDS Telephone and Data Systems, Inc. | 2 of 9 | −10.0% | −33.0% | −39.5% | −13.4% | −7.7% | −30.8% | −33.8% | −2.8% | −67.6% | −64.3% |
| ERIC Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ) | 3 of 9 | −2.3% | −53.5% | −31.3% | −13.3% | −7.5% | −19.2% | −31.9% | −0.8% | −71.4% | −98.6% |
| AMT American Tower Corporation | 5 of 9 | −2.3% | −34.2% | −28.8% | −8.4% | −8.0% | −19.2% | −13.6% | −2.9% | −56.5% | −98.7% |
| VZ Verizon Communications Inc. | 6 of 9 | −2.6% | −33.2% | −13.6% | −12.5% | −7.4% | −10.5% | −9.9% | 0.0% | −43.9% | −55.2% |
| LUMN Lumen Technologies, Inc. | 3 of 9 | −13.9% | −49.4% | −33.7% | −34.8% | −9.8% | −21.3% | −17.7% | −1.5% | −50.8% | −43.7% |
| SBAC SBA Communications Corporation | 3 of 9 | −3.9% | −34.1% | −28.8% | −8.7% | −7.8% | −33.6% | −15.8% | −0.6% | −72.2% | −99.6% |
| CCI Crown Castle Inc. | 4 of 9 | −2.4% | −34.5% | −29.8% | −10.7% | −7.4% | −11.1% | −11.9% | −2.1% | −76.1% | −97.6% |
| RCI Rogers Communications Inc. | 5 of 9 | −2.8% | −38.1% | −35.1% | −6.5% | −5.5% | −17.7% | −14.5% | 0.0% | −61.2% | −82.8% |
| CMCSA Comcast Corporation | 5 of 9 | −1.6% | −43.4% | −27.5% | −16.1% | −7.1% | −14.7% | −21.7% | −0.8% | −53.1% | −61.6% |
| BCE BCE Inc. | 6 of 9 | −1.7% | −28.9% | −33.9% | −7.3% | −2.1% | −17.0% | −9.8% | 0.0% | −60.7% | −50.7% |
| TU TELUS Corporation | 4 of 9 | −2.2% | −28.1% | −31.7% | −10.3% | −2.8% | −25.4% | −14.9% | 0.0% | −58.5% | −88.5% |
| CHTR Charter Communications, Inc. | 3 of 8 | −6.9% | −52.7% | −31.5% | −17.8% | −10.0% | −18.0% | −29.6% | −1.3% | — | — |
How closely does TMUS move with the S&P 500?
Upside capture measures how much of the S&P 500's gains an investment kept in the months the market rose, and downside capture how much of its losses it took in the months the market fell. An investment that captures more of the gains than the losses has compounded ahead of the market over time. This section compares TMUS with its popular alternatives on both measures, and on beta (how strongly each has moved with the market), over the past 10 years.
- None of the 18 popular alternatives with the same record had a higher capture ratio (upside capture divided by downside capture) than TMUS's 1.72.
- Over the past 10 years, TMUS captured 63% of the S&P 500's gains in rising months and 37% of its losses in falling months, with a beta of 0.46. That is a defensive profile: it gave up some of the market's upside in exchange for smaller losses.
Monthly total returns over the past 10 years, measured against SPY. 100% capture or a beta of 1.00 means moving in line with the S&P 500. Green marks a better figure than TMUS's: more upside, less downside or a higher capture ratio. Sorted by capture ratio.
| Investment | Upside capture | Downside capture | Capture ratio | Beta |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TMUS This pageT-Mobile US, Inc. | 63% | 37% | 1.72 | 0.46 |
| TDS Telephone and Data Systems, Inc. | 50% | 47% | 1.06 | 0.70 |
| AMX América Móvil, S.A.B. de C.V. | 58% | 55% | 1.05 | 0.69 |
| NOK Nokia Oyj | 63% | 72% | 0.87 | 1.01 |
| SKM SK Telecom Co.,Ltd | 90% | 111% | 0.81 | 0.86 |
| AMT American Tower Corporation | 61% | 79% | 0.78 | 0.60 |
| T AT&T Inc. | 47% | 62% | 0.76 | 0.50 |
| KT KT Corporation | 66% | 88% | 0.75 | 0.71 |
| VZ Verizon Communications Inc. | 44% | 60% | 0.74 | 0.36 |
| SBAC SBA Communications Corporation | 55% | 79% | 0.70 | 0.64 |
| ERIC Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ) | 73% | 108% | 0.67 | 0.71 |
| VOD Vodafone Group Public Limited Company | 52% | 100% | 0.53 | 0.69 |
| CCI Crown Castle Inc. | 54% | 101% | 0.53 | 0.70 |
| RCI Rogers Communications Inc. | 53% | 104% | 0.51 | 0.59 |
| CMCSA Comcast Corporation | 65% | 139% | 0.47 | 0.87 |
| TU TELUS Corporation | 42% | 93% | 0.46 | 0.67 |
| BCE BCE Inc. | 43% | 100% | 0.43 | 0.50 |
| LUMN Lumen Technologies, Inc. | 99% | 255% | 0.39 | 1.44 |
| CHTR Charter Communications, Inc. | 41% | 141% | 0.29 | 0.88 |
What diversifies TMUS?
Correlation measures how closely two investments move together, on a scale from 1 (in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to -1 (in opposite directions). This section lists large ETFs and stocks whose returns have had a low correlation with TMUS's. Because such investments tend not to fall at the same time, pairing TMUS with them can reduce a portfolio's overall swings.
- Moving a fifth of the money in TMUS into DXJ would have cut the portfolio's volatility by 18% over the past 5 years and raised its annual return (+6.1% for TMUS alone, +10.5% for the mix).
- SMH made money in five of the six calendar years in which TMUS lost money.
- Among large ETFs, LVHI, DXJ and SMH have moved largely independently of TMUS over the past 5 years, with correlations of 0.36 or lower, and each still earned a positive 5-year return.
Only ETFs with at least $1.0B in assets and stocks worth at least $10B, with a correlation below 0.5 over the past 5 years and a positive return, are included, ranked by Sharpe ratio; funds that hold the same thing are shown once. The year columns are the years in which TMUS lost money. The last two columns show a portfolio that is 80% TMUS and 20% the other investment, rebalanced monthly.
ETFs
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2025 | 2021 | 2014 | 2011 | 2009 | 2008 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TMUS T-Mobile US, Inc. (this page) | 1.00 | +36.1% | 0.37 | −6.6% | −14.0% | −19.9% | −31.3% | −48.6% | −23.7% | 22.3% | +6.1% |
| LVHI InternationalFranklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 0.36 | +119% | 1.48 | +27.1% | +17.8% | — | — | — | — | 18.6% | +8.5% |
| DXJ InternationalWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund | 0.13 | +225% | 1.34 | +32.8% | +18.0% | +8.1% | −16.1% | +2.0% | −20.8% | 18.4% | +10.5% |
| SMH TechnologyVanEck Semiconductor ETF | -0.11 | +323% | 0.97 | +49.2% | +42.1% | +30.2% | +6.8% | +60.5% | −44.7% | 18.4% | +13.4% |
| DBEF InternationalXtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF | 0.26 | +85.0% | 0.96 | +23.1% | +19.6% | +3.4% | — | — | — | 18.6% | +8.0% |
| GLD CommoditiesSPDR Gold Shares | 0.25 | +126% | 0.96 | +63.7% | −4.2% | −2.2% | +9.6% | +24.0% | +4.9% | 19.0% | +8.9% |
| SPMO Broad MarketInvesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 0.11 | +136% | 0.93 | +26.6% | +22.7% | — | — | — | — | 18.8% | +9.7% |
| XLE EnergyState Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | 0.40 | +177% | 0.93 | +7.9% | +53.3% | −8.7% | +2.8% | +21.8% | −39.0% | 20.5% | +9.9% |
| DFIV InternationalDimensional - International Value ETF | 0.32 | +99.4% | 0.93 | +45.4% | — | — | — | — | — | 19.1% | +8.3% |
Stocks
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2025 | 2021 | 2014 | 2011 | 2009 | 2008 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TMUS T-Mobile US, Inc. (this page) | 1.00 | +36.1% | 0.37 | −6.6% | −14.0% | −19.9% | −31.3% | −48.6% | −23.7% | 22.3% | +6.1% |
| CAH Medical - DistributionCardinal Health, Inc. | 0.16 | +479% | 1.55 | +76.3% | −0.4% | +23.0% | +8.1% | −4.4% | −39.6% | 19.4% | +12.7% |
| CLS Hardware, Equipment & PartsCelestica Inc. | -0.07 | +3,143% | 1.47 | +220% | +37.9% | +12.9% | −24.4% | +105% | −20.5% | 20.7% | +25.5% |
| FIX Engineering & ConstructionComfort Systems USA, Inc. | -0.03 | +1,636% | 1.46 | +121% | +89.0% | −10.4% | −17.0% | +17.8% | −15.2% | 19.7% | +21.4% |
| MCK Medical - DistributionMcKesson Corporation | 0.41 | +413% | 1.44 | +44.5% | +44.2% | +29.3% | +11.8% | +62.9% | −40.4% | 20.4% | +11.8% |
| MPC Oil & Gas Refining & MarketingMarathon Petroleum Corporation | 0.24 | +690% | 1.41 | +19.2% | +61.0% | +0.4% | — | — | — | 20.4% | +14.5% |
Common questions
What was TMUS's worst drawdown?
TMUS's deepest decline since it began trading in 2007 was 86.3%, from July 2007 to January 2010. It took about ten years from the low to climb back to its old high. Because TMUS launched in April 2007, that record does not include the dot-com bust.
What were TMUS's best and worst years?
Over 18 full calendar years, TMUS's best year was 2020, when it returned 72.0%. Its worst was 2009, with a return of -48.6%.
Is there a better investment than TMUS?
Among TMUS's popular alternatives, KT earned more than TMUS with less volatility over the past 5 years: 13.1% a year at 22.6% volatility, against 6.4% a year at 26.1%. Looking beyond its popular alternatives, MSI (communications equipment) and CHT (integrated telecommunications) earned more than TMUS with less volatility over the past 5 years. MSI returned 14.8% a year at 23.6% volatility, against 6.4% a year at 26.1%.
Is TMUS more volatile than the S&P 500?
Yes. TMUS's volatility over the past 5 years was 26.1%, 1.5 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, TMUS's return lands within 26.1% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump.
What is TMUS's Sharpe ratio?
TMUS's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.37, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so TMUS earned less for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings.
How correlated is TMUS with the S&P 500?
Over the past 5 years, TMUS's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.23 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They are only loosely linked, which makes it a real diversifier next to an index fund. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against TMUS instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a TMUS holding.
What are the best alternatives to TMUS?
Of the 18 popular alternatives we compared, seven outperformed TMUS in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes, with dividends reinvested: AMX, KT and SKM.
Did TMUS outperform the S&P 500?
TMUS finished ahead of the S&P 500 (SPY) in nine of 18 full calendar years. In 2025, it returned -6.6%, against +17.7% for the index.
How did TMUS do in stock market crashes?
TMUS fell less than the S&P 500 (SPY) in four of the nine major crashes it has traded through, and further in five. The clearest case was the 2011 euro debt crisis, when TMUS fell 52.5% and the S&P 500 fell 17.9%.
What diversifies TMUS?
These had a low correlation with TMUS over the past 5 years and still earned a positive 5-year return: among large ETFs, LVHI (correlation 0.36), DXJ (correlation 0.13) and SMH (correlation -0.11); among large stocks, CAH (correlation 0.16), CLS (correlation -0.07) and FIX (correlation -0.03). A correlation near zero means the two have moved largely independently.
How we measure
- Short-term periods are 1M, 3M, 6M, YTD, 1Y; long-term periods are 3Y, 5Y, 10Y. An investment outperformed in a period when its total return, with dividends reinvested, was higher than TMUS's. Returns within 0.5 points or 3% of TMUS's, whichever is larger, count as a tie.
- "Qualified" means outperforming in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods. "All-weather" means outperforming in every long-term period and all but one short-term period.
- Popular alternatives are the funds and stocks most often compared with this one. We include only those that trade today, are not leveraged or inverse, and hold at least $200 million.
- Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily returns over 5 years, a measure of how much the price typically swings in a year. The Sharpe ratio is the return above cash for each unit of that volatility.
- A decline, or drawdown, runs from a peak to the lowest close before the next high. The worst decline ever uses all the price history we have; comparisons between funds use the past 10 years so that younger funds are judged on the same stretch.
- Sector overlap is the share of assets two funds hold in the same sectors. Correlation and the mixed-portfolio figures use monthly returns.
- Upside and downside capture follow Morningstar's definition: the compound monthly return in the months the S&P 500 rose (or fell), divided by the S&P 500's compound return in those months. Beta measures how strongly monthly returns have moved with the S&P 500. All three use the same window for every investment.
- Figures are computed from daily adjusted prices and update after each trading day. Past performance does not predict future results.
More research
Popular alternatives to TMUS
AMXAmérica Móvil, S.A.B. de C.V.
NOKNokia Oyj
TAT&T
VODVodafone Group Public
AMTAmerican Tower
VZVerizon Communications
CMCSAComcast