Relative Intelligence · Telecommunications

How Comcast (CMCSA) compares with the whole market and its popular alternatives
Built by QuantCommons' quantitative engine, this page is about relative opportunity, not data on CMCSA alone. It places CMCSA (Comcast Corporation) against 14 popular alternatives, its neighboring categories and the entire market of over 10,000 U.S.-listed stocks and ETFs, and surfaces what has done better on consistent outperformance, return for the risk taken, behavior in real market crashes and diversification. The result is a clearer view of where CMCSA stands in the market, and of the alternatives worth a closer look.
Period covered: CMCSA's full trading record, from October 1986 through September 2026. All returns include reinvested dividends. Data as of October 20, 2026.
Data as of October 20, 2026. Full tables and charts read best on a larger screen.
On this page12 sections
Key findings
- Right nowCMCSA has gone against the market, falling 22.6% over the past 6 months while the S&P 500 rose 9.1%. CMCSA is 57.0% below its high, bear-market territory, while the S&P 500 sits 1.3% below a record. At a glance ↓
- Stock or market?CMCSA fell 4.5% over the past 3 months, 3.1 points behind the telecommunications ETF IYZ (iShares U.S. Telecommunications ETF), which fell 1.4%. The S&P 500 rose 3.9%. Its telecommunication peers did not move as one over the past 3 months: T (AT&T) rose 8.0%, while TMUS (T-Mobile US) fell 18.9%.
- Past 1 to 3 yearsOver the past year, CMCSA fell 20.3% while the S&P 500 rose 15.8%. The same gap shows up over 3 years (41.4% against 89.3%). The last two calendar years both went the same way: CMCSA fell 22.6% in 2025, while the S&P 500 rose 15.8%. By year ↓
- Long termCMCSA turned $10,000 into $9,010 over the past decade, against $42,100 in the S&P 500. CMCSA's 10-year loss of 9.9% puts it behind 85% of the stocks worth at least $300 million with that much history. The S&P 500 returned 321%. Growth of $10,000 ↓
- In a crashThe 2022 bear market took 43.4% off CMCSA, against 24.5% for the S&P 500. That was more than VZ (Verizon Communications, 33.2%) but less than CHTR (Charter Communications, 52.7%). Crash tests ↓
- DiversificationOver 10 years, CMCSA's beta versus the S&P 500 was 0.87: in the S&P 500's rising months it gained 65% as much as the index, and in falling months it lost 1.4 times as much. When the S&P 500 had a down month, CMCSA usually fell with it (17 of 22 months). By year ↓
- Better options
- Nearby categories and themes
- CHT (Chunghwa Telecom, integrated telecommunications) and MSI (Motorola Solutions, communications equipment) earned more than CMCSA with less volatility over the past 5 years. CHT returned 7.7% a year at 13.3% volatility, against a loss of 13.5% a year at 27.7%.
- Whole market
- 1,337 of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than CMCSA with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them VTI (Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF), VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) and BRK-B (Berkshire Hathaway).
How much would $10,000 in CMCSA have grown?
This chart tracks a hypothetical $10,000 investment in CMCSA over the past 29 years, with dividends reinvested, alongside the same amount in the S&P 500, investments that ended ahead of CMCSA over the same span and CMCSA's popular alternatives, among those that traded for the entire period. A second view covers the past 5 years, the period the better options further down the page are judged on. It shows not only where each investment ended up but also how smooth or uneven the path was.
- $10,000 invested in CMCSA at the end of September 1997 would have grown to $75,723 by September 2026, less than the $132,907 it would have become in SPY, an S&P 500 fund.
- Five of the eight other investments on the chart ended ahead of CMCSA, and RY finished highest, at $442,765.
Choose a period
From the end of September 1997 to the end of September 2026. The scale is logarithmic, so equal steps up the chart are equal percentage gains. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 634 of the 1,042 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of CMCSA; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- RY$442,765+4,328% total · +14.0% a year
- RCI$210,974+2,010% total · +11.1% a year
- CSCO$206,586+1,966% total · +11.0% a year
- BCE$142,233+1,322% total · +9.6% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$132,907+1,229% total · +9.3% a year
- PG$87,839+778% total · +7.8% a year
- CMCSA$75,723+657% total · +7.2% a year
- T$65,217+552% total · +6.7% a year
- DIS$52,341+423% total · +5.9% a year
- VZ$47,395+374% total · +5.5% a year
From the end of September 2021 to the end of September 2026. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 3,279 of the 3,628 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of CMCSA; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- CSCO$22,737+127% total · +17.9% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$19,000+90.0% total · +13.7% a year
- T$16,172+61.7% total · +10.1% a year
- VZ$11,648+16.5% total · +3.1% a year
- NFLX$11,401+14.0% total · +2.7% a year
- RCI$7,952−20.5% total · −4.5% a year
- AMT$7,254−27.5% total · −6.2% a year
- DIS$6,395−36.1% total · −8.6% a year
- BCE$5,689−43.1% total · −10.7% a year
- CMCSA$4,552−54.5% total · −14.6% a year
CMCSA at a glance
This section summarizes the key facts about the stock, its returns over periods from one to ten years and the risk it has carried, with dividends reinvested throughout. These figures serve as the baseline for every comparison that follows.
- CMCSA is still 57.0% below its all-time high.
- CMCSA's deepest decline since it began trading in 1986 was 68.0%, from December 1999 to March 2009. It took about three years from the low to climb back to its old high.
- Over 29 full calendar years, CMCSA's best was 1997, when it returned 81.0%, and its worst was 2007, when it lost 35.3%. It lost money in 12 of those years.
The company
- Market value
- $79B
- Industry
- Telecommunications Services
- Price history from
- October 1986
Returns
- Past 1 year
- −20.3%total return
- Past 3 years
- −41.4%−16.3% a year
- Past 5 years
- −51.6%−13.5% a year
- Past 10 years
- −9.9%−1.0% a year
- Best calendar year
- +81.0%1997
- Worst calendar year
- −35.3%2007
- Losing years
- 12 of 29full calendar years
Risk
- Volatility
- 27.7%typical yearly swing, 5 years
- Sharpe ratio
- -0.39return per unit of risk, 5 years
- Worst decline ever
- −68.0%Dec 1999 to Mar 2009
- From its all-time high
- −57.0%below the peak
CMCSA against the whole market
Where CMCSA ranks among every stock and fund, and what across the market has done better.
How does CMCSA rank among all stocks?
This section ranks CMCSA on return, volatility, risk-adjusted return and worst decline against every stock worth at least $300 million with enough history. Where the comparisons with its popular alternatives show how CMCSA stacks up against its peers, these rankings show where it stands in the market as a whole.
- On return for the risk taken (the Sharpe ratio), CMCSA ranks in the bottom 2% of the 2,893 stocks worth at least $300 million.
- CMCSA is among the steadier stocks: its price swings rank in the top 18% of the 2,893 stocks worth at least $300 million, where the top is the calmest.
Ranked against U.S.-listed stocks worth at least $300M that have enough history for each measure, so the count changes from row to row; smaller stocks are left out. Lower volatility and smaller declines rank higher.
| Measure | CMCSA | Rank | Standing |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | −20.3% | 2,645 of 3,287 | bottom 21% |
| 3-year return | −41.4% | 2,789 of 3,017 | bottom 9% |
| 5-year return | −51.6% | 2,409 of 2,893 | bottom 18% |
| 10-year return | −9.9% | 1,869 of 2,202 | bottom 16% |
| Volatility, 5 years | 27.7% | 532 of 2,893 | top 18% |
| Sharpe ratio, 5 years | -0.39 | 2,834 of 2,893 | bottom 3% |
| Worst decline, past 10 years | −60.3% | 889 of 2,187 | top 41% |
What has beaten CMCSA on both return and risk?
Each dot is an investment, placed by how much it earned a year over the past 5 years (higher is better) and how much its price swung, its volatility (further left is calmer). CMCSA sits where the dashed lines cross. Anything in the green box above and to the left earned more than CMCSA with smaller swings, a better trade-off over this period on both counts. Past results are no promise, but a name in the box is worth a closer look.
- 417 stocks and 920 ETFs worth at least $500 million sit in the green region: each earned more than CMCSA over the past 5 years with smaller price swings. That is 37% of the 3,633 screened.
- Among those with at least half CMCSA's swings, CAH has the best return for its risk: 42.1% a year at 24.7% volatility, 11% less than CMCSA's 27.7%, and a Sharpe ratio (return above cash per unit of volatility) of 1.55 against -0.39 for CMCSA.
- Among CMCSA's popular alternatives, CSCO, T and TMUS are in the region. CSCO earned 16.8% a year against a loss of 13.5% a year for CMCSA, at 26.1% volatility, 6% less than CMCSA's 27.7%.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested, and volatility the annualized swing in daily prices, both over 5 years. Labeled dots are the strongest picks from the table below and the names called out above, colored by how close they sit to CMCSA; faint dots are 90 more of the 1,337 in the green region (the strongest, one per fund family). 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million were screened. Hover over a dot for its figures.
- Popular alternatives
- Same and neighboring categories, and shared themes
- The whole market
- Others in the green region
Is there a better investment than CMCSA?
Investments that beat CMCSA over the past 5 years on return, volatility, drawdowns, consistency, crash losses or fees, from its popular alternatives out to the whole market.
- Among CMCSA's popular alternatives, VZ, CSCO and T earned more than CMCSA with less volatility over the past 5 years. VZ returned 2.7% a year at 22.9% volatility, against a loss of 13.5% a year at 27.7%.
- Looking beyond its popular alternatives, CHT (integrated telecommunications) and MSI (communications equipment) earned more than CMCSA with less volatility over the past 5 years. CHT returned 7.7% a year at 13.3% volatility, against a loss of 13.5% a year at 27.7%.
- Across the whole market, 1,337 of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than CMCSA with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them VTI, VOO and BRK-B.
How this works
The table below lists investments that beat CMCSA over the past 5 years on at least one of these measures: a higher annual return with lower volatility, a higher annual return at similar volatility, a similar return with lower volatility, a higher Sharpe ratio with a smaller worst decline, a higher total return in most periods from 3 months to 10 years, or smaller losses in recent market crashes. It checks CMCSA's popular alternatives first, then the rest of its own and neighboring categories, then every stock and fund worth at least $500 million, and shows the strongest few in each group. The full list of those with a higher return and lower volatility than CMCSA follows the table.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested. Annual return, volatility and the Sharpe ratio cover 5 years; the worst decline covers the past 10 years. Green marks a better figure than CMCSA's. "On the frontier" means no other option shown or tested earned more with less volatility. Funds that hold the same thing are shown once. Beyond the popular alternatives, nothing with more than 1.5× CMCSA's volatility counts as better.
These figures cover the past 5 years. Green marks a better figure than CMCSA's.
| Investment | Why it is better | Past 5 years | Downside | Long run | Fit | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Annual return?higher is better | Volatility?lower is calmer | Sharpe?return per unit of risk | Worst decline?past 10 years | 10Y returntotal | Corr. with CMCSA?lower diversifies more | Expenseper year | |||
| −13.5% | 27.7% | -0.39 | −60.3% | −9.9% | 1.00 | — | |||
| +12.7% | 17.1% | 0.79 | −33.7% | +321% | 0.41 | 0.09% | |||
| Popular alternativesbest 6 shownThe investments people most often weigh against CMCSA. 9 of 14 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +2.7% | 22.9% | 0.23 | −41.2% | +55.8% | 0.55 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +16.8% | 26.1% | 0.73 | −42.0% | +374% | 0.17 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +9.8% | 25.2% | 0.50 | −39.4% | +60.7% | 0.51 | — | ||
| Higher return, similar volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | −4.8% | 27.3% | -0.04 | −45.4% | +107% | 0.43 | — | ||
RCIRogers Communications Inc. · Integrated Telecommunications | Higher return, lower volatilityHigher return in most periods | −4.8% | 23.4% | -0.09 | −56.9% | +12.2% | 0.44 | — | |
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +6.4% | 26.1% | 0.37 | −44.0% | +253% | 0.47 | — | ||
| Same and neighboring categories, and shared themesbest 6 shownEverything else in Telecommunications and the categories next to it (Integrated Telecommunications, Communications Equipment), plus CMCSA's specific themes. 20 of 36 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
CHTChunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. · Integrated Telecommunications | Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +7.7% | 13.3% | 0.63 | −23.8% | +101% | 0.24 | — | |
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +14.8% | 23.6% | 0.71 | −32.8% | +625% | 0.46 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +8.5% | 25.8% | 0.45 | −44.4% | +149% | 0.23 | — | ||
XLCState Street Communication Services Select Sector SPDR ETF · Communication Services · Video Streaming theme | Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +7.2% | 21.1% | 0.44 | −46.7% | — | 0.56 | 0.08% | |
VOXVanguard Communication Services ETF · Communication Services Equity · Video Streaming theme | Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +6.6% | 21.6% | 0.40 | −46.8% | +137% | 0.46 | 0.09% | |
FOXAFox Corporation · Media · Video Streaming theme | Higher return, similar volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +10.4% | 28.7% | 0.49 | −50.6% | — | 0.36 | — | |
| The whole marketbest 8 shownEvery other stock and fund worth at least $500 million. 2,320 of 3,583 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| On the frontierHigher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +3.7% | 0.3% | 14.05 | −0.2% | +25.8% | 0.15 | 0.14% | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +17.7% | 18.9% | 0.96 | −26.4% | +213% | 0.32 | 0.40% | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +5.1% | 18.3% | 0.37 | −23.8% | +145% | 0.32 | — | ||
FLRTPacer Aristotle Pacific Floating Rate High Income ETF · Financials | On the frontierHigher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +6.0% | 2.3% | 2.55 | −21.0% | +58.0% | 0.37 | 0.60% | |
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | −0.4% | 6.1% | -0.03 | −18.6% | +13.2% | 0.56 | 0.03% | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +2.7% | 2.9% | 0.94 | −6.3% | +32.7% | 0.44 | 0.03% | ||
| On the frontierHigher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +17.3% | 18.2% | 0.97 | −40.0% | +352% | 0.39 | — | ||
| Higher return, similar volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +18.5% | 28.0% | 0.75 | −38.5% | +1,168% | 0.15 | — | ||
What these numbers mean for CMCSA
- Annual return
- CMCSA lost 13.5% a year over the past 5 years with dividends reinvested, against 12.7% a year for the S&P 500. At that pace, $10,000 became about $4,840. Annual return is the steady yearly rate that would produce the same total result, so investments held over the same span compare fairly. Guide: What is performance and return? →
- Volatility
- CMCSA's volatility over the past 5 years was 27.7%, 1.6 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, CMCSA's return lands within 27.7% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump. Guide: Understanding and measuring risk (volatility) →
- Sharpe ratio
- CMCSA's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was -0.39, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so CMCSA earned less for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings. Guide: Balancing reward with risk (Sharpe ratio) →
- Worst decline
- CMCSA's worst fall from a peak to a low over the past 10 years was 60.2%, against 33.7% for the S&P 500. Losses and gains are not symmetric: climbing back from a 60.2% fall takes a 152% gain. Guide: Market crash risk and tail risk →
- Correlation
- Over the past 5 years, CMCSA's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.41 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They often move together: some diversification next to an index fund, but not a cushion. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against CMCSA instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a CMCSA holding. Guide: Correlation and diversification →
Show all 1,337 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that earned more than CMCSA with less volatility
Out of 3,633 tested over 5 years. The strongest 100 are listed, best first, with funds that hold the same thing listed once.
| # | Investment | Found in | Annual return | Volatility | Sharpe | Worst decline | 10Y return | Corr. with CMCSA | Expense |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Whole market | +3.7% | 0.3% | 14.05 | −0.2% | +25.8% | 0.15 | 0.14% | |
| 2 | Whole market | +17.7% | 18.9% | 0.96 | −26.4% | +213% | 0.32 | 0.40% | |
| 3 | Whole market | +5.1% | 18.3% | 0.37 | −23.8% | +145% | 0.32 | — | |
| 4 | FLRTPacer Aristotle Pacific Floating Rate High Income ETF · Financials | Whole market | +6.0% | 2.3% | 2.55 | −21.0% | +58.0% | 0.37 | 0.60% |
| 5 | Whole market | −0.4% | 6.1% | -0.03 | −18.6% | +13.2% | 0.56 | 0.03% | |
| 6 | Whole market | +2.7% | 2.9% | 0.94 | −6.3% | +32.7% | 0.44 | 0.03% | |
| 7 | Whole market | +17.3% | 18.2% | 0.97 | −40.0% | +352% | 0.39 | — | |
| 8 | Whole market | +1.7% | 2.8% | 0.63 | −8.5% | +20.5% | 0.51 | 0.03% | |
| 9 | FLOTiShares Floating Rate Bond ETF · Floating Rate Bonds | Whole market | +4.5% | 1.8% | 2.48 | −13.5% | +35.9% | 0.21 | 0.15% |
| 10 | Whole market | +42.1% | 24.7% | 1.55 | −46.1% | +349% | 0.16 | — | |
| 11 | Whole market | +0.2% | 4.9% | 0.06 | −16.2% | +15.0% | 0.44 | 0.07% | |
| 12 | SHYiShares 1-3 Year Treasury Bond ETF · Treasury Bonds | Whole market | +1.8% | 2.0% | 0.89 | −5.7% | +17.7% | 0.47 | 0.15% |
| 13 | SPSBState Street SPDR Portfolio Short Term Corporate Bond ETF · Investment Grade Bonds | Whole market | +2.8% | 2.0% | 1.38 | −11.8% | +29.2% | 0.55 | 0.04% |
| 14 | JAAAJanus Henderson AAA CLO ETF · CLO Bonds | Whole market | +5.1% | 1.7% | 2.98 | −2.6% | — | 0.19 | 0.20% |
| 15 | Whole market | +0.3% | 4.2% | 0.09 | −13.7% | +17.8% | 0.48 | 0.05% | |
| 16 | Whole market | +11.5% | 17.5% | 0.71 | −35.0% | +302% | 0.41 | 0.03% | |
| 17 | FLTRVanEck IG Floating Rate ETF · Multi-Asset | Whole market | +4.8% | 2.1% | 2.20 | −17.8% | +41.8% | 0.26 | 0.14% |
| 18 | CHDChurch & Dwight Co., Inc. · Household & Personal Products | Whole market | +6.1% | 21.1% | 0.39 | −31.7% | +154% | 0.40 | — |
| 19 | Whole market | +12.8% | 16.9% | 0.80 | −34.0% | +324% | 0.41 | 0.03% | |
| 20 | FLRNState Street SPDR Bloomberg Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF · Bonds | Whole market | +4.5% | 1.7% | 2.58 | −14.7% | +35.9% | 0.25 | 0.15% |
| 21 | BKLNInvesco Senior Loan ETF · Bank Loans | Whole market | +5.4% | 4.5% | 1.19 | −24.1% | +50.7% | 0.36 | 0.67% |
| 22 | KMBKimberly-Clark Corporation · Household & Personal Products | Whole market | 0.0% | 21.1% | 0.11 | −34.1% | +29.9% | 0.24 | — |
| 23 | LMBSFirst Trust Low Duration Opportunities ETF · Mortgage-Backed Securities | Whole market | +3.0% | 2.6% | 1.14 | −6.5% | +25.6% | 0.51 | 0.66% |
| 24 | SRLNState Street Blackstone Senior Loan ETF · Bank Loans | Whole market | +4.7% | 3.9% | 1.18 | −22.3% | +54.2% | 0.34 | 0.70% |
| 25 | XLPState Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF · Consumer Staples | Whole market | +7.2% | 13.8% | 0.57 | −24.5% | +121% | 0.45 | 0.08% |
| 26 | HYGiShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF · High Yield Bonds | Whole market | +3.1% | 7.5% | 0.45 | −22.0% | +49.5% | 0.56 | 0.49% |
| 27 | Whole market | +20.8% | 22.6% | 0.96 | −25.7% | +508% | 0.09 | — | |
| 28 | Whole market | +13.4% | 17.1% | 0.82 | −29.6% | +274% | 0.42 | — | |
| 29 | FTSLFirst Trust Senior Loan Fund · Bonds | Whole market | +5.0% | 3.4% | 1.49 | −22.7% | +52.1% | 0.27 | 0.70% |
| 30 | Whole market | +17.3% | 24.3% | 0.78 | −43.6% | +537% | 0.46 | — | |
| 31 | CMS-PBConsumers Energy Company · Preferred Securities | Whole market | −2.2% | 23.1% | 0.02 | −24.0% | +20.2% | 0.26 | — |
| 32 | Whole market | +26.1% | 23.4% | 1.11 | −45.1% | +603% | 0.24 | — | |
| 33 | RAVINorthern Trust Ultra-Short Fixed Income ETF · Bonds | Whole market | +3.8% | 1.4% | 2.61 | −3.7% | +30.8% | 0.34 | 0.26% |
| 34 | MEARiShares Short Maturity Municipal Bond Active ETF · Bonds | Whole market | +2.4% | 1.0% | 2.37 | −2.7% | +19.3% | 0.48 | 0.26% |
| 35 | SCHPSchwab US TIPS ETF · Treasury Bonds | Whole market | +0.1% | 6.1% | 0.05 | −14.3% | +25.0% | 0.51 | 0.03% |
| 36 | CHTChunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. · Integrated Telecommunications | Same or nearby category | +7.7% | 13.3% | 0.63 | −23.8% | +101% | 0.24 | — |
| 37 | Whole market | +12.7% | 17.9% | 0.76 | −27.4% | +196% | 0.28 | — | |
| 38 | Whole market | +12.8% | 22.9% | 0.64 | −36.4% | +429% | 0.48 | — | |
| 39 | DXJWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund · International Equity | Whole market | +26.6% | 19.1% | 1.34 | −39.1% | +428% | 0.37 | 0.48% |
| 40 | LVHIFranklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +17.0% | 11.1% | 1.48 | −32.4% | +194% | 0.57 | 0.40% |
| 41 | FTLSFirst Trust Long/Short Equity ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +10.2% | 10.4% | 0.99 | −20.6% | +158% | 0.39 | 0.95% |
| 42 | Whole market | +14.7% | 16.8% | 0.91 | −37.0% | +204% | 0.26 | — | |
| 43 | Whole market | +17.4% | 22.9% | 0.82 | −31.4% | +685% | 0.27 | — | |
| 44 | Whole market | +8.2% | 16.4% | 0.57 | −36.0% | +140% | 0.58 | 0.05% | |
| 45 | AORiShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF · Multi-Asset | Whole market | +6.4% | 10.7% | 0.64 | −23.0% | +118% | 0.54 | 0.20% |
| 46 | Whole market | +14.5% | 23.0% | 0.71 | −35.1% | +553% | 0.26 | 0.18% | |
| 47 | Whole market | +12.4% | 23.8% | 0.61 | −41.0% | +541% | 0.49 | — | |
| 48 | Whole market | +21.0% | 23.4% | 0.94 | −42.9% | +242% | 0.45 | — | |
| 49 | Popular alternative | +2.7% | 22.9% | 0.23 | −41.2% | +55.8% | 0.55 | — | |
| 50 | Whole market | +38.7% | 25.0% | 1.44 | −38.1% | +586% | 0.20 | — | |
| 51 | Whole market | +16.3% | 24.8% | 0.74 | −43.4% | +241% | 0.12 | — | |
| 52 | Whole market | +17.1% | 20.7% | 0.87 | −26.8% | +226% | 0.50 | — | |
| 53 | BALTInnovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF · Crypto | Whole market | +6.3% | 3.3% | 1.85 | −4.9% | — | 0.42 | 0.69% |
| 54 | LDURPIMCO Enhanced Low Duration Active Exchange-Traded Fund · Bonds | Whole market | +2.4% | 2.1% | 1.13 | −8.7% | +26.7% | 0.43 | 0.54% |
| 55 | EMLCVanEck J.P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond ETF · International Bonds | Whole market | +2.4% | 9.1% | 0.30 | −26.4% | +18.2% | 0.58 | 0.30% |
| 56 | Whole market | +12.1% | 13.7% | 0.90 | −36.8% | +235% | 0.57 | 0.03% | |
| 57 | Whole market | +18.6% | 24.3% | 0.83 | −52.0% | +317% | 0.25 | — | |
| 58 | Whole market | +19.6% | 24.9% | 0.85 | −24.9% | +266% | 0.47 | — | |
| 59 | Whole market | +22.8% | 24.9% | 0.95 | −30.5% | +200% | 0.44 | — | |
| 60 | Whole market | +9.3% | 16.9% | 0.61 | −35.8% | +153% | 0.58 | 0.03% | |
| 61 | Whole market | +15.8% | 20.0% | 0.84 | −42.0% | +310% | 0.31 | — | |
| 62 | TRTootsie Roll Industries, Inc. · Food Confectioners | Whole market | +7.8% | 25.2% | 0.42 | −36.4% | +65.5% | 0.26 | — |
| 63 | Whole market | +19.9% | 22.3% | 0.93 | −42.5% | +361% | 0.27 | — | |
| 64 | VRIGInvesco Variable Rate Investment Grade ETF · Bonds | Whole market | +4.7% | 1.3% | 3.51 | −13.1% | +40.5% | 0.30 | 0.30% |
| 65 | DBAInvesco DB Agriculture Fund · Alternatives | Whole market | +10.7% | 13.8% | 0.81 | −35.3% | +62.2% | 0.22 | 0.90% |
| 66 | Whole market | +11.5% | 20.9% | 0.63 | −32.6% | +394% | 0.47 | — | |
| 67 | Whole market | +18.4% | 26.0% | 0.78 | −35.1% | +779% | 0.22 | 0.09% | |
| 68 | Whole market | +21.3% | 25.6% | 0.89 | −30.3% | +816% | 0.31 | — | |
| 69 | FTQIFirst Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF · Dividend & Income | Whole market | +11.5% | 14.8% | 0.82 | −19.4% | +121% | 0.33 | 0.75% |
| 70 | Whole market | +15.7% | 20.4% | 0.82 | −42.6% | +248% | 0.43 | — | |
| 71 | Whole market | +17.8% | 21.4% | 0.88 | −53.7% | +140% | 0.37 | — | |
| 72 | Whole market | +22.7% | 24.4% | 0.97 | −50.5% | +341% | 0.45 | — | |
| 73 | Whole market | +19.2% | 21.6% | 0.93 | −47.3% | +395% | 0.29 | — | |
| 74 | Whole market | +6.8% | 17.6% | 0.47 | −39.4% | +198% | 0.48 | 0.03% | |
| 75 | Whole market | +10.4% | 14.1% | 0.78 | −31.7% | +258% | 0.48 | 0.04% | |
| 76 | Whole market | +22.4% | 22.3% | 1.02 | −46.3% | +347% | 0.41 | — | |
| 77 | CWTCalifornia Water Service Group · Regulated Water | Whole market | −2.9% | 24.3% | 0.00 | −38.2% | +74.4% | 0.27 | — |
| 78 | QAINYLI Hedge Multi-Strategy Tracker ETF · Alternatives | Whole market | +4.1% | 6.8% | 0.64 | −14.9% | +44.1% | 0.51 | 0.75% |
| 79 | Whole market | 0.0% | 24.7% | 0.12 | −38.0% | +217% | 0.45 | — | |
| 80 | Whole market | +24.2% | 22.8% | 1.07 | −32.4% | +406% | 0.36 | — | |
| 81 | Whole market | +9.7% | 14.3% | 0.72 | −33.4% | +252% | 0.65 | 0.06% | |
| 82 | KXIiShares Global Consumer Staples ETF · International | Whole market | +5.6% | 12.9% | 0.49 | −24.6% | +87.8% | 0.49 | 0.38% |
| 83 | Whole market | +13.6% | 21.4% | 0.71 | −51.0% | +295% | 0.39 | — | |
| 84 | Whole market | +26.3% | 24.9% | 1.07 | −41.6% | +654% | 0.31 | — | |
| 85 | Whole market | +12.9% | 19.9% | 0.71 | −46.9% | +187% | 0.47 | — | |
| 86 | Whole market | +7.1% | 22.9% | 0.42 | −38.7% | +295% | 0.32 | — | |
| 87 | Whole market | +6.2% | 20.6% | 0.40 | −42.0% | +179% | 0.46 | 0.03% | |
| 88 | Whole market | +17.2% | 24.9% | 0.77 | −30.4% | +285% | 0.30 | — | |
| 89 | Whole market | +18.7% | 22.5% | 0.88 | −55.1% | +163% | 0.54 | — | |
| 90 | Whole market | +11.1% | 24.2% | 0.56 | −36.7% | +204% | 0.28 | — | |
| 91 | Whole market | +10.3% | 16.2% | 0.69 | −34.2% | +223% | 0.50 | 0.06% | |
| 92 | Whole market | +11.3% | 18.8% | 0.67 | −38.4% | +170% | 0.34 | — | |
| 93 | Whole market | +16.5% | 23.1% | 0.78 | −48.4% | +808% | 0.33 | — | |
| 94 | Whole market | +6.8% | 19.4% | 0.44 | −38.7% | +122% | 0.46 | 0.09% | |
| 95 | Whole market | +5.2% | 17.5% | 0.38 | −36.4% | +102% | 0.50 | 0.06% | |
| 96 | Whole market | +5.2% | 8.9% | 0.61 | −25.4% | +37.8% | 0.24 | — | |
| 97 | Whole market | +11.2% | 20.8% | 0.62 | −37.4% | +319% | 0.17 | — | |
| 98 | Whole market | +12.9% | 20.8% | 0.69 | −51.6% | +184% | 0.24 | — | |
| 99 | Whole market | +19.0% | 20.8% | 0.95 | −54.9% | +335% | 0.47 | — | |
| 100 | Whole market | +9.1% | 18.9% | 0.56 | −44.1% | +103% | 0.45 | — |
CMCSA against its popular alternatives
The investments people most often weigh against CMCSA, compared period by period and year by year.
How do CMCSA's risk and return compare with its alternatives?
This map plots each investment's annual return over the past 5 years against its volatility, the size of its typical price swings. Investments toward the upper left earned more for a smoother ride, and those toward the lower right earned less for a rougher one. The dashed lines cross at CMCSA, which divides the map into what did better or worse on each measure.
- Eight of the 14 popular alternatives, led by CSCO, T and TMUS, were both more rewarding and calmer than CMCSA over the past 5 years, earning a higher annual return with lower volatility.
- Over the past 5 years, CMCSA returned -13.5% a year, less than the S&P 500's 12.7%, with higher volatility (27.7% against 17.1%).
Green points earned more than CMCSA with less volatility; red points earned less with more. Hover over a point for its figures. Total returns with dividends reinvested, annualized.
All figures
| Investment | Annual return | Volatility |
|---|---|---|
| CSCO Cisco Systems, Inc. | +16.8% | 26.1% |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | +12.7% | 17.1% |
| T AT&T Inc. | +9.8% | 25.2% |
| TMUS T-Mobile US, Inc. | +6.4% | 26.1% |
| VZ Verizon Communications Inc. | +2.7% | 22.9% |
| NFLX Netflix, Inc. | +1.9% | 43.8% |
| RCI Rogers Communications Inc. | −4.8% | 23.4% |
| AMT American Tower Corporation | −4.8% | 27.3% |
| DIS The Walt Disney Company | −7.5% | 29.5% |
| BCE BCE Inc. | −11.3% | 20.0% |
| TU TELUS Corporation | −12.3% | 20.3% |
| LBTYK Liberty Global plc | −13.1% | 31.2% |
| CMCSA This pageComcast Corporation | −13.5% | 27.7% |
| ROKU Roku, Inc. | −14.2% | 66.1% |
| LUMN Lumen Technologies, Inc. | −17.4% | 86.3% |
| CHTR Charter Communications, Inc. | −31.6% | 41.3% |
Has CMCSA consistently beaten its popular alternatives?
This section compares CMCSA with the investments people most often weigh against it, checking each one over eight periods from one month to ten years. Counting how often an alternative earned more than CMCSA helps separate lasting outperformance from a single strong stretch.
- Seven of the 14 popular alternatives, led by AMT, DIS and CSCO, outperformed CMCSA in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes.
- AMT, DIS and CSCO outperformed CMCSA in every long-term period and in all but one short-term period, the most consistent record in the group.
- CSCO, T and TMUS earned more for the risk they took than CMCSA (a higher Sharpe ratio) and fell less in their worst decline of the past 10 years.
A green cell means the alternative earned more than CMCSA over that period. "Qualified" marks those that did so in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods.
| Investment | Periods outperformed | Short term | Long term | Risk · 5 years | Fund | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1M | 3M | 6M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | 10Y | Volatilitylower is calmer | Sharpehigher is better | Worst declinepast 10 years | Expense | Assets | Overlapsame sectors | ||
| CMCSA Comcast Corporation (this page) | — | −1.0% | −4.5% | −22.6% | −14.9% | −20.3% | −41.4% | −51.6% | −9.9% | 27.7% | -0.39 | −60.3% | — | $79B | — |
| AMT QualifiedAmerican Tower Corporation | 5/5 short3/3 longAll-weather | +6.3% | +11.1% | +3.1% | +8.2% | −1.1% | +27.5% | −21.8% | +107% | 27.3% | -0.04 | −45.4% | — | $86B | — |
| DIS QualifiedThe Walt Disney Company | 5/5 short3/3 longAll-weather | +7.1% | +15.8% | +5.8% | +0.6% | +1.2% | +39.3% | −32.5% | +31.7% | 29.5% | -0.12 | −60.7% | — | $193B | — |
| CSCO QualifiedCisco Systems, Inc. | 4/5 short3/3 longAll-weather | −3.9% | −3.2% | +22.6% | +42.2% | +53.8% | +118% | +118% | +374% | 26.1% | 0.73 | −42.0% | — | $421B | — |
| T QualifiedAT&T Inc. | 4/5 short3/3 longAll-weather | −6.8% | +8.0% | −8.2% | 0.0% | −5.9% | +77.2% | +59.7% | +60.7% | 25.2% | 0.50 | −39.4% | — | $161B | — |
| VZ QualifiedVerizon Communications Inc. | 4/5 short3/3 longAll-weather | −5.1% | +4.0% | −1.0% | +17.2% | +16.4% | +71.5% | +14.4% | +55.8% | 22.9% | 0.23 | −41.2% | — | $185B | — |
| RCI QualifiedRogers Communications Inc. | 3/5 short3/3 long | −6.2% | −6.5% | −1.4% | −12.5% | −8.4% | −1.3% | −21.7% | +12.2% | 23.4% | -0.09 | −56.9% | — | $17B | — |
| BCE QualifiedBCE Inc. | 3/5 short2/3 long | −8.7% | −6.2% | −14.0% | −11.8% | −11.4% | −32.5% | −45.2% | −20.1% | 20.0% | -0.51 | −56.6% | — | $19B | — |
| NFLX EntertainmentNetflix, Inc. | 1/5 short3/3 long | −6.4% | +1.6% | −27.6% | −24.5% | −44.5% | +71.3% | +9.9% | +457% | 43.8% | 0.27 | −75.9% | — | $286B | — |
| TMUS Telecommunications ServicesT-Mobile US, Inc. | 1/5 short3/3 long | −4.5% | −18.9% | −19.6% | −19.7% | −30.0% | +21.1% | +36.1% | +253% | 26.1% | 0.37 | −44.0% | — | $169B | — |
| TU Telecommunications ServicesTELUS Corporation | 0/5 short3/3 long | −2.5% | −16.5% | −28.5% | −31.3% | −38.9% | −34.4% | −48.2% | −8.4% | 20.3% | -0.55 | −61.9% | — | $13B | — |
| ROKU EntertainmentRoku, Inc. | 5/5 short1/3 long | +2.1% | +9.3% | +32.7% | +44.9% | +63.7% | +163% | −53.5% | — | 66.1% | 0.10 | −91.9% | — | $21B | — |
| LBTYK Telecommunications ServicesLiberty Global plc | 0/5 short1/3 long | −20.6% | −22.1% | −36.6% | −28.0% | −31.2% | −15.8% | −50.3% | −51.9% | 31.2% | -0.29 | −61.2% | — | $2.7B | — |
| LUMN Telecommunications ServicesLumen Technologies, Inc. | 0/5 short1/3 long | −30.6% | −29.8% | −48.3% | −41.7% | −37.4% | +222% | −61.5% | −71.8% | 86.3% | 0.17 | −94.4% | — | $4.6B | — |
| CHTR Telecommunications ServicesCharter Communications, Inc. | 0/5 short0/3 long | −10.8% | −14.8% | −55.0% | −47.4% | −56.3% | −74.4% | −85.0% | −57.4% | 41.3% | -0.71 | −87.5% | — | $15B | — |
How did CMCSA do year by year?
This table shows each investment's total return in every full calendar year since 1997, along with where CMCSA ranked among its popular alternatives each year. Annual results reveal how consistently each one kept pace with CMCSA and how far its good and bad years diverged, detail that multiyear averages tend to smooth over.
- CMCSA finished ahead of the S&P 500 in 14 of its 29 full calendar years, and behind it in each of the last two.
- Among its popular alternatives, NFLX came out ahead of CMCSA most often, in 15 of the 23 years both traded.
- Ranked against its popular alternatives each year, CMCSA finished in the top quarter in six of 29 years and in the bottom quarter in four. In 2025, it ranked 14 of 15.
Newest year first. Green marks a year in which the fund came out ahead of CMCSA; gray means the two finished within a fraction of a point. The rank row places CMCSA among the alternatives that traded the full year; dark green is the top quarter and red the bottom quarter.
| Investment | Years ahead of CMCSA | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | 1998 | 1997 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CMCSA This pageComcast Corporation | — | −22.6% | −12.0% | +28.8% | −28.8% | −2.3% | +19.0% | +33.9% | −12.8% | +17.3% | +24.8% | −1.2% | +13.0% | +41.3% | +60.4% | +10.3% | +33.2% | +1.4% | −6.6% | −35.3% | +63.5% | −22.2% | +1.5% | +38.9% | −34.4% | −12.9% | −13.7% | +66.9% | +80.5% | +81.0% |
| Rank among alternatives | Top quarter in 6 of 29 | 14 of 15 | 10 of 15 | 3 of 15 | 9 of 15 | 10 of 15 | 6 of 15 | 5 of 15 | 11 of 15 | 6 of 14 | 4 of 14 | 9 of 14 | 7 of 14 | 6 of 14 | 1 of 14 | 9 of 14 | 7 of 13 | 12 of 13 | 2 of 13 | 12 of 12 | 1 of 12 | 10 of 11 | 9 of 11 | 7 of 11 | 8 of 10 | 4 of 10 | 6 of 10 | 4 of 10 | 4 of 9 | 1 of 9 |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 14 of 29 | +17.7% | +24.9% | +26.2% | −18.2% | +28.7% | +18.3% | +31.2% | −4.6% | +21.7% | +12.0% | +1.2% | +13.5% | +32.3% | +16.0% | +1.9% | +15.1% | +26.4% | −36.8% | +5.1% | +15.9% | +4.8% | +10.7% | +28.2% | −21.6% | −11.7% | −9.8% | +20.4% | +28.7% | +33.5% |
| AMT American Tower Corporation | 15 of 27 | −0.9% | −12.2% | +5.4% | −25.7% | +32.9% | −0.5% | +47.9% | +13.3% | +37.7% | +11.2% | 0.0% | +25.8% | +4.8% | +30.4% | +16.9% | +19.5% | +47.3% | −31.2% | +14.3% | +37.5% | +47.2% | +70.0% | +207% | −62.8% | −75.0% | +23.9% | +3.4% | — | — |
| DIS The Walt Disney Company | 14 of 29 | +3.3% | +24.4% | +4.3% | −43.9% | −14.5% | +25.3% | +33.5% | +3.6% | +4.8% | +0.7% | +12.9% | +24.9% | +55.3% | +34.8% | +1.6% | +17.6% | +43.8% | −28.7% | −4.6% | +44.3% | −12.9% | +20.2% | +44.5% | −20.3% | −27.7% | −0.4% | −1.5% | −8.5% | +42.8% |
| CSCO Cisco Systems, Inc. | 15 of 29 | +33.5% | +21.0% | +9.3% | −22.5% | +45.8% | −3.5% | +13.8% | +16.6% | +31.3% | +15.1% | +0.6% | +28.0% | +16.7% | +11.6% | −9.6% | −15.5% | +46.9% | −39.8% | −1.0% | +59.7% | −11.4% | −20.3% | +85.0% | −27.7% | −52.6% | −28.6% | +131% | +150% | +31.2% |
| T AT&T Inc. | 13 of 29 | +14.0% | +44.0% | −2.8% | +6.5% | −5.9% | −19.6% | +48.5% | −20.8% | −2.4% | +32.0% | +10.3% | +2.4% | +11.6% | +19.4% | +11.1% | +14.0% | +6.9% | −26.9% | +22.1% | +55.6% | +1.9% | +5.5% | +3.6% | −27.6% | −15.4% | +0.6% | −6.7% | +50.8% | +46.9% |
| VZ Verizon Communications Inc. | 11 of 29 | +8.9% | +13.1% | +2.7% | −20.0% | −7.5% | −0.1% | +13.8% | +11.3% | +4.0% | +20.7% | +3.6% | −0.5% | +18.6% | +13.2% | +18.2% | +23.0% | +3.8% | −20.1% | +22.1% | +34.0% | −22.2% | +20.1% | −5.7% | −15.3% | −2.6% | −16.9% | +17.0% | +22.4% | +46.6% |
| RCI Rogers Communications Inc. | 13 of 29 | +28.6% | −31.9% | +3.4% | +1.6% | +5.6% | −3.0% | −0.2% | +3.7% | +36.4% | +16.1% | −7.1% | −10.1% | +3.3% | +23.0% | +15.7% | +15.8% | +7.5% | −31.7% | +53.3% | +41.4% | +62.0% | +58.8% | +77.4% | −44.2% | −1.0% | −31.1% | +180% | +81.5% | −31.6% |
| BCE BCE Inc. | 12 of 29 | +10.2% | −35.5% | −4.2% | −10.7% | +28.6% | −2.0% | +23.9% | −12.6% | +15.0% | +17.3% | −11.6% | +11.3% | +6.1% | +8.6% | +23.8% | +35.5% | +43.3% | −47.1% | +53.1% | +7.8% | +3.5% | +13.5% | +30.0% | −16.3% | −17.6% | +41.8% | +164% | +31.3% | +67.6% |
| NFLX Netflix, Inc. | 15 of 23 | +5.2% | +83.0% | +65.1% | −51.0% | +11.4% | +67.1% | +20.9% | +39.4% | +55.1% | +8.2% | +134% | −7.2% | +298% | +33.4% | −60.6% | +219% | +84.3% | +12.3% | +2.9% | −4.4% | +119% | −54.9% | +397% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| TMUS T-Mobile US, Inc. | 9 of 18 | −6.6% | +39.7% | +15.0% | +20.7% | −14.0% | +72.0% | +23.3% | +0.1% | +10.4% | +47.0% | +45.2% | −19.9% | +69.2% | +14.5% | −31.3% | +65.5% | −48.6% | −23.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| TU TELUS Corporation | 14 of 29 | +5.0% | −18.4% | −2.3% | −14.4% | +24.4% | +7.3% | +22.8% | −8.5% | +24.2% | +20.4% | −20.1% | +8.7% | +9.9% | +26.7% | +28.4% | +46.8% | +16.2% | −38.4% | +11.1% | +14.2% | +42.5% | +61.1% | +86.2% | −23.7% | −40.3% | +14.4% | +13.6% | −5.8% | +54.4% |
| ROKU Roku, Inc. | 4 of 8 | +45.9% | −18.9% | +125% | −82.2% | −31.3% | +148% | +337% | −40.8% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| LBTYK Liberty Global plc | 9 of 20 | −16.0% | +34.6% | −4.0% | −30.9% | +18.8% | +8.5% | +5.5% | −39.0% | +14.0% | −16.1% | −9.4% | +14.6% | +43.6% | +48.6% | +16.6% | +55.1% | +44.2% | −58.6% | +30.7% | +32.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| LUMN Lumen Technologies, Inc. | 13 of 29 | +46.3% | +190% | −64.9% | −55.5% | +38.7% | −19.1% | −5.3% | +2.0% | −21.7% | +2.2% | −31.9% | +31.7% | −13.2% | +13.1% | −13.2% | +38.0% | +44.9% | −29.6% | −4.5% | +32.6% | −5.9% | +9.6% | +11.9% | −9.8% | −7.6% | −24.1% | +5.7% | +105% | +62.9% |
| CHTR Charter Communications, Inc. | 8 of 15 | −39.1% | −11.8% | +14.6% | −48.0% | −1.5% | +36.4% | +70.2% | −15.2% | +16.7% | +42.2% | +9.9% | +21.8% | +79.4% | +33.9% | +46.2% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Risk and diversification
How CMCSA has fallen, how it held up in crashes beside the S&P 500 and its popular alternatives, and what moves independently of it.
What were CMCSA's worst declines?
A drawdown is the decline from a peak to the lowest point before a new high. This section presents CMCSA's five deepest drawdowns since it began trading in 1986, alongside the S&P 500's return over the same dates, and how long each took to recover. Together, these figures show how much an investor could have lost and how long it took to get back to even.
- In all three of CMCSA's worst declines, the S&P 500 held up better over the same dates.
- Not every decline was the market's doing: CMCSA fell 60.2% from September 2021 to October 2026, while the S&P 500 rose 84.3%.
- The slowest recovery came after CMCSA fell 68.0% from December 1999 to March 2009; it did not regain that peak until August 2012, three years later.
Green means CMCSA fell less than the S&P 500 over the same dates. Based on daily closing prices with dividends reinvested.
| During | CMCSA fell | S&P 500, same dates | Peak | Low | Time to the low | Back at the peak | Time to recover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dot-com bust | −68.0% | −45.9% | Dec 1999 | Mar 2009 | 9.3 years | Aug 2012 | 3.4 years |
| 2022 bear market | −60.3% | +84.3% | Sep 2021 | Oct 2026 | 5.1 years | Not yet | — |
| No named crash | −58.3% | — | Oct 1989 | Oct 1990 | 12 months | Dec 1992 | 2.2 years |
| No named crash | −50.2% | +14.0% | Oct 1993 | Apr 1995 | 18 months | Oct 1997 | 2.5 years |
| No named crash | −38.7% | — | Jul 1987 | Oct 1987 | 3 months | Feb 1988 | 4 months |
How did CMCSA do in stock market crashes?
This section measures how far CMCSA, the S&P 500 and each alternative fell from peak to trough during every major market crash since 2000. A smaller decline means an investment held up better, and comparing results across crashes shows whether that resilience was consistent or a one-off.
- Among its popular alternatives, VZ held up best, falling less than CMCSA in eight of the ten crashes they both traded through.
- CMCSA fell less than the S&P 500 in five of the ten crashes it has traded through. The clearest case was the Covid crash, when CMCSA fell 27.5% and the S&P 500 fell 33.7%.
Newest crash first. Each figure is the fund's deepest fall within the crash window; green means a smaller fall than CMCSA.
| Investment | Held up better | 2023 regional bank crisisMar 2023 | 2022 bear marketJan 2022 | Covid crashFeb 2020 | Late-2018 sell-offSep 2018 | February 2018 volatility shockFeb 2018 | 2015 China and oil sell-offAug 2015 | 2011 euro debt crisisJul 2011 | 2010 flash crashMay 2010 | 2008 financial crisisOct 2007 | Dot-com bustMar 2000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CMCSA This pageComcast Corporation | — | −1.6% | −43.4% | −27.5% | −16.1% | −7.1% | −14.7% | −21.7% | −0.8% | −53.1% | −61.6% |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 5 of 10 | −3.4% | −24.5% | −33.7% | −19.3% | −6.5% | −12.8% | −17.9% | −1.5% | −55.2% | −47.5% |
| AMT American Tower Corporation | 3 of 10 | −2.3% | −34.2% | −28.8% | −8.4% | −8.0% | −19.2% | −13.6% | −2.9% | −56.5% | −98.7% |
| DIS The Walt Disney Company | 2 of 10 | −6.8% | −41.8% | −39.3% | −14.9% | −6.8% | −25.5% | −28.7% | −1.8% | −54.9% | −67.6% |
| CSCO Cisco Systems, Inc. | 3 of 10 | −1.4% | −35.4% | −29.1% | −17.5% | −5.3% | −22.8% | −16.6% | −3.1% | −60.0% | −89.3% |
| T AT&T Inc. | 5 of 10 | −1.6% | −29.2% | −30.6% | −18.3% | −6.5% | −8.6% | −9.1% | −0.3% | −44.4% | −63.5% |
| VZ Verizon Communications Inc. | 8 of 10 | −2.6% | −33.2% | −13.6% | −12.5% | −7.4% | −10.5% | −9.9% | 0.0% | −43.9% | −55.2% |
| RCI Rogers Communications Inc. | 5 of 10 | −2.8% | −38.1% | −35.1% | −6.5% | −5.5% | −17.7% | −14.5% | 0.0% | −61.2% | −82.8% |
| BCE BCE Inc. | 6 of 10 | −1.7% | −28.9% | −33.9% | −7.3% | −2.1% | −17.0% | −9.8% | 0.0% | −60.7% | −50.7% |
| NFLX Netflix, Inc. | 1 of 9 | −6.1% | −71.9% | −22.6% | −38.7% | −6.7% | −36.8% | −59.7% | −6.5% | −55.9% | — |
| TMUS T-Mobile US, Inc. | 3 of 9 | −2.6% | −12.1% | −26.0% | −13.7% | −7.4% | −21.2% | −52.5% | −11.3% | −57.5% | — |
| TU TELUS Corporation | 5 of 10 | −2.2% | −28.1% | −31.7% | −10.3% | −2.8% | −25.4% | −14.9% | 0.0% | −58.5% | −88.5% |
| ROKU Roku, Inc. | 0 of 5 | −5.9% | −76.8% | −49.6% | −64.5% | −7.1% | — | — | — | — | — |
| LBTYK Liberty Global plc | 0 of 9 | −3.8% | −43.0% | −27.3% | −30.9% | −7.7% | −38.0% | −23.8% | −5.3% | −76.9% | — |
| LUMN Lumen Technologies, Inc. | 3 of 10 | −13.9% | −49.4% | −33.7% | −34.8% | −9.8% | −21.3% | −17.7% | −1.5% | −50.8% | −43.7% |
| CHTR Charter Communications, Inc. | 0 of 8 | −6.9% | −52.7% | −31.5% | −17.8% | −10.0% | −18.0% | −29.6% | −1.3% | — | — |
How closely does CMCSA move with the S&P 500?
Upside capture measures how much of the S&P 500's gains an investment kept in the months the market rose, and downside capture how much of its losses it took in the months the market fell. An investment that captures more of the gains than the losses has compounded ahead of the market over time. This section compares CMCSA with its popular alternatives on both measures, and on beta (how strongly each has moved with the market), over the past 10 years.
- Eight of the 13 popular alternatives had a higher capture ratio (upside capture divided by downside capture) than CMCSA's 0.47, led by TMUS, NFLX and CSCO.
- TMUS took just 37% of the S&P 500's losses, against 139% for CMCSA, while still keeping 63% of its gains.
- Over the past 10 years, CMCSA captured 65% of the S&P 500's gains in rising months and 139% of its losses in falling months, with a beta of 0.87. Its share of the market's losses was larger than its share of the gains.
Monthly total returns over the past 10 years, measured against SPY. 100% capture or a beta of 1.00 means moving in line with the S&P 500. Green marks a better figure than CMCSA's: more upside, less downside or a higher capture ratio. Sorted by capture ratio.
| Investment | Upside capture | Downside capture | Capture ratio | Beta |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CMCSA This pageComcast Corporation | 65% | 139% | 0.47 | 0.87 |
| TMUS T-Mobile US, Inc. | 63% | 37% | 1.72 | 0.46 |
| NFLX Netflix, Inc. | 122% | 105% | 1.16 | 1.18 |
| CSCO Cisco Systems, Inc. | 101% | 96% | 1.06 | 0.97 |
| AMT American Tower Corporation | 61% | 79% | 0.78 | 0.60 |
| T AT&T Inc. | 47% | 62% | 0.76 | 0.50 |
| VZ Verizon Communications Inc. | 44% | 60% | 0.74 | 0.36 |
| DIS The Walt Disney Company | 90% | 162% | 0.56 | 1.32 |
| RCI Rogers Communications Inc. | 53% | 104% | 0.51 | 0.59 |
| TU TELUS Corporation | 42% | 93% | 0.46 | 0.67 |
| BCE BCE Inc. | 43% | 100% | 0.43 | 0.50 |
| LUMN Lumen Technologies, Inc. | 99% | 255% | 0.39 | 1.44 |
| LBTYK Liberty Global plc | 63% | 168% | 0.38 | 1.12 |
| CHTR Charter Communications, Inc. | 41% | 141% | 0.29 | 0.88 |
What diversifies CMCSA?
Correlation measures how closely two investments move together, on a scale from 1 (in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to -1 (in opposite directions). This section lists large ETFs and stocks whose returns have had a low correlation with CMCSA's. Because such investments tend not to fall at the same time, pairing CMCSA with them can reduce a portfolio's overall swings.
- Moving a fifth of the money in CMCSA into DXJ would have cut the portfolio's volatility by 16% over the past 5 years and raised its annual return (-14.6% for CMCSA alone, -6.9% for the mix).
- FIX made money in nine of the 12 calendar years in which CMCSA lost money.
- Among large ETFs, DXJ, SMH and DBEF have moved largely independently of CMCSA over the past 5 years, with correlations of 0.48 or lower, and each still earned a positive 5-year return.
Only ETFs with at least $1.0B in assets and stocks worth at least $10B, with a correlation below 0.5 over the past 5 years and a positive return, are included, ranked by Sharpe ratio; funds that hold the same thing are shown once. The year columns are the years in which CMCSA lost money. The last two columns show a portfolio that is 80% CMCSA and 20% the other investment, rebalanced monthly.
ETFs
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2025 | 2024 | 2022 | 2021 | 2018 | 2015 | 2008 | 2007 | 2005 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CMCSA Comcast Corporation (this page) | 1.00 | −51.6% | -0.39 | −22.6% | −12.0% | −28.8% | −2.3% | −12.8% | −1.2% | −6.6% | −35.3% | −22.2% | −34.4% | −12.9% | −13.7% | 26.6% | −14.6% |
| DXJ InternationalWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund | 0.37 | +225% | 1.34 | +32.8% | +29.8% | +6.0% | +18.0% | −19.8% | +7.7% | −20.8% | −7.4% | — | — | — | — | 22.4% | −6.9% |
| SMH TechnologyVanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.23 | +323% | 0.97 | +49.2% | +39.1% | −33.5% | +42.1% | −9.1% | −0.3% | −44.7% | +6.0% | +10.8% | −47.0% | −14.6% | — | 23.8% | −4.8% |
| DBEF InternationalXtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF | 0.48 | +85.0% | 0.96 | +23.1% | +13.4% | −5.1% | +19.6% | −9.5% | +4.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | 22.4% | −9.1% |
| GLD CommoditiesSPDR Gold Shares | 0.32 | +126% | 0.96 | +63.7% | +26.7% | −0.8% | −4.2% | −1.9% | −10.7% | +4.9% | +30.4% | +17.8% | — | — | — | 22.7% | −8.2% |
| SPMO Broad MarketInvesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 0.21 | +136% | 0.93 | +26.6% | +45.8% | −10.4% | +22.7% | −0.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 22.5% | −7.6% |
| XLE EnergyState Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | 0.47 | +177% | 0.93 | +7.9% | +5.6% | +64.4% | +53.3% | −18.2% | −21.5% | −39.0% | +36.8% | +40.1% | −14.8% | −18.2% | +24.4% | 24.2% | −7.5% |
| VLUE Broad MarketiShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF | 0.43 | +109% | 0.90 | +32.7% | +7.2% | −14.2% | +28.9% | −11.1% | −4.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | 23.3% | −8.4% |
| EWT TechnologyiShares MSCI Taiwan ETF | 0.33 | +153% | 0.89 | +28.4% | +16.1% | −28.9% | +28.9% | −9.9% | −12.9% | −45.3% | +6.4% | +4.7% | −24.4% | +2.1% | — | 23.5% | −7.5% |
Stocks
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2025 | 2024 | 2022 | 2021 | 2018 | 2015 | 2008 | 2007 | 2005 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CMCSA Comcast Corporation (this page) | 1.00 | −51.6% | -0.39 | −22.6% | −12.0% | −28.8% | −2.3% | −12.8% | −1.2% | −6.6% | −35.3% | −22.2% | −34.4% | −12.9% | −13.7% | 26.6% | −14.6% |
| CAH Medical - DistributionCardinal Health, Inc. | 0.16 | +479% | 1.55 | +76.3% | +19.0% | +54.1% | −0.4% | −24.5% | +12.6% | −39.6% | −9.8% | +18.7% | −8.3% | −2.5% | +108% | 22.8% | −5.0% |
| CLS Hardware, Equipment & PartsCelestica Inc. | 0.01 | +3,143% | 1.47 | +220% | +215% | +1.3% | +37.9% | −16.3% | −6.0% | −20.5% | −25.7% | −25.2% | −65.1% | −25.6% | −2.3% | 24.4% | +5.9% |
| FIX Engineering & ConstructionComfort Systems USA, Inc. | 0.01 | +1,636% | 1.46 | +121% | +107% | +17.0% | +89.0% | +0.8% | +67.7% | −15.2% | +2.1% | +20.1% | −9.4% | +73.7% | −71.1% | 23.2% | +2.5% |
| MCK Medical - DistributionMcKesson Corporation | 0.20 | +413% | 1.44 | +44.5% | +23.7% | +51.8% | +44.2% | −28.4% | −4.5% | −40.4% | +29.7% | +64.9% | −27.2% | +4.9% | +61.2% | 22.9% | −5.5% |
| MPC Oil & Gas Refining & MarketingMarathon Petroleum Corporation | 0.28 | +690% | 1.41 | +19.2% | −4.0% | +86.6% | +61.0% | −8.2% | +17.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | 23.9% | −3.4% |
Common questions
What was CMCSA's worst drawdown?
CMCSA's deepest decline since it began trading in 1986 was 68.0%, from December 1999 to March 2009. It took about three years from the low to climb back to its old high.
What were CMCSA's best and worst years?
Over 29 full calendar years, CMCSA's best year was 1997, when it returned 81.0%. Its worst was 2007, with a return of -35.3%.
Is there a better investment than CMCSA?
Among CMCSA's popular alternatives, VZ, CSCO and T earned more than CMCSA with less volatility over the past 5 years. VZ returned 2.7% a year at 22.9% volatility, against a loss of 13.5% a year at 27.7%. Looking beyond its popular alternatives, CHT (integrated telecommunications) and MSI (communications equipment) earned more than CMCSA with less volatility over the past 5 years. CHT returned 7.7% a year at 13.3% volatility, against a loss of 13.5% a year at 27.7%.
Is CMCSA more volatile than the S&P 500?
Yes. CMCSA's volatility over the past 5 years was 27.7%, 1.6 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, CMCSA's return lands within 27.7% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump.
What is CMCSA's Sharpe ratio?
CMCSA's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was -0.39, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so CMCSA earned less for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings.
How correlated is CMCSA with the S&P 500?
Over the past 5 years, CMCSA's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.41 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They often move together: some diversification next to an index fund, but not a cushion. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against CMCSA instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a CMCSA holding.
What are the best alternatives to CMCSA?
Of the 14 popular alternatives we compared, seven outperformed CMCSA in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes, with dividends reinvested: AMT, DIS and CSCO.
Did CMCSA outperform the S&P 500?
CMCSA finished ahead of the S&P 500 (SPY) in 14 of 29 full calendar years. In 2025, it returned -22.6%, against +17.7% for the index.
How did CMCSA do in stock market crashes?
CMCSA fell less than the S&P 500 (SPY) in five of the ten major crashes it has traded through, and further in five. The clearest case was the Covid crash, when CMCSA fell 27.5% and the S&P 500 fell 33.7%.
What diversifies CMCSA?
These had a low correlation with CMCSA over the past 5 years and still earned a positive 5-year return: among large ETFs, DXJ (correlation 0.37), SMH (correlation 0.23) and DBEF (correlation 0.48); among large stocks, CAH (correlation 0.16), CLS (correlation 0.01) and FIX (correlation 0.01). A correlation near zero means the two have moved largely independently.
How we measure
- Short-term periods are 1M, 3M, 6M, YTD, 1Y; long-term periods are 3Y, 5Y, 10Y. An investment outperformed in a period when its total return, with dividends reinvested, was higher than CMCSA's. Returns within 0.5 points or 3% of CMCSA's, whichever is larger, count as a tie.
- "Qualified" means outperforming in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods. "All-weather" means outperforming in every long-term period and all but one short-term period.
- Popular alternatives are the funds and stocks most often compared with this one. We include only those that trade today, are not leveraged or inverse, and hold at least $200 million.
- Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily returns over 5 years, a measure of how much the price typically swings in a year. The Sharpe ratio is the return above cash for each unit of that volatility.
- A decline, or drawdown, runs from a peak to the lowest close before the next high. The worst decline ever uses all the price history we have; comparisons between funds use the past 10 years so that younger funds are judged on the same stretch.
- Sector overlap is the share of assets two funds hold in the same sectors. Correlation and the mixed-portfolio figures use monthly returns.
- Upside and downside capture follow Morningstar's definition: the compound monthly return in the months the S&P 500 rose (or fell), divided by the S&P 500's compound return in those months. Beta measures how strongly monthly returns have moved with the S&P 500. All three use the same window for every investment.
- Figures are computed from daily adjusted prices and update after each trading day. Past performance does not predict future results.
More research
Popular alternatives to CMCSA
AMTAmerican Tower
DISWalt Disney
CSCOCisco Systems
TAT&T
VZVerizon Communications
NFLXNetflix
TMUST-Mobile US