Relative Intelligence · Passenger Transportation

How Uber Technologies (UBER) compares with the whole market and its popular alternatives
Built by QuantCommons' quantitative engine, this page is about relative opportunity, not data on UBER alone. It places UBER (Uber Technologies, Inc.) against 14 popular alternatives, its neighboring categories and the entire market of over 10,000 U.S.-listed stocks and ETFs, and surfaces what has done better on consistent outperformance, return for the risk taken, behavior in real market crashes and diversification. The result is a clearer view of where UBER stands in the market, and of the alternatives worth a closer look.
Period covered: UBER's full trading record, from May 2019 through September 2026. The crash tests reach back to 2000 using older funds and the S&P 500. All returns include reinvested dividends. Data as of October 20, 2026.
Data as of October 20, 2026. Full tables and charts read best on a larger screen.
On this page12 sections
Key findings
- Right nowOver the past 6 months, UBER fell 11.0% while the S&P 500 rose 9.1%. UBER is 31.1% below its high, bear-market territory, while the S&P 500 sits 1.3% below a record. At a glance ↓
- Stock or market?UBER fell 4.5% over the past 3 months, 4.8 points ahead of the passenger transportation ETF IYT (iShares U.S. Transportation ETF), which fell 9.3%. The S&P 500 rose 3.9%. Its passenger transportation peers did not move as one over the past 3 months: GPN (Global Payments) rose 3.3%, while BILI (Bilibili) fell 24.4%.
- Past 1 to 3 yearsUBER has gone against the market, falling 26.4% over the past year while the S&P 500 rose 15.8%. The same gap shows up over 3 years (60.5% against 89.3%). By year ↓
- Long termUBER turned $10,000 into $15,000 over the past 5 years, against $18,200 in the S&P 500. Even so, it outpaced every one of its passenger transportation peers over the past 5 years, including DASH (DoorDash) and GPN (Global Payments). Growth of $10,000 ↓
- In a crashIn the Covid crash, UBER fell 63.9%, against 33.7% for the S&P 500. That was more than GPN (Global Payments, 44.3%) but less than LYFT (65.3%). Crash tests ↓
- DiversificationAgainst the S&P 500, UBER has a correlation of 0.50 over 5 years, more closely than 74% of stocks worth at least $300 million. Next to an index fund it is some diversification, but not a hedge. Market capture ↓
- Better options
- Popular alternatives
- GOOG (Alphabet) earned more than UBER with less volatility over the past 5 years: 19.0% a year at 32.0% volatility, against 8.4% a year at 44.8%.
- Nearby categories and themes
- RACE (Ferrari, automobiles) earned more than UBER with less volatility over the past 5 years: 13.3% a year at 30.0% volatility, against 8.4% a year at 44.8%.
- Whole market
- 1,008 of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than UBER with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them AAPL (Apple), GOOG (Alphabet) and MSFT (Microsoft).
How much would $10,000 in UBER have grown?
This chart tracks a hypothetical $10,000 investment in UBER over the past 7 years, with dividends reinvested, alongside the same amount in the S&P 500, investments that ended ahead of UBER over the same span and UBER's popular alternatives, among those that traded for the entire period. A second view covers the past 5 years, the period the better options further down the page are judged on. It shows not only where each investment ended up but also how smooth or uneven the path was.
Note: UBER began trading on May 10, 2019, so the chart cannot reach back to the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or five other sell-offs. It covers the most recent 7 years of UBER's record, starting at the end of September 2019.
- $10,000 invested in UBER at the end of September 2019 would have grown to $22,485 by September 2026, less than the $28,402 it would have become in SPY, an S&P 500 fund.
- Five of the eight other investments on the chart ended ahead of UBER, and NVDA finished highest, at $528,672.
Choose a period
From the end of September 2019 to the end of September 2026. The scale is logarithmic, so equal steps up the chart are equal percentage gains. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 1,154 of the 3,144 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of UBER; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- NVDA$528,672+5,187% total · +76.3% a year
- TSLA$220,928+2,109% total · +55.6% a year
- GOOG$56,431+464% total · +28.0% a year
- META$41,109+311% total · +22.4% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$28,402+184% total · +16.1% a year
- RACE$26,852+169% total · +15.2% a year
- UBER$22,485+125% total · +12.3% a year
- ZTO$10,464+4.6% total · +0.7% a year
- GPN$5,448−45.5% total · −8.3% a year
- LYFT$3,675−63.3% total · −13.3% a year
From the end of September 2021 to the end of September 2026. The scale is logarithmic, so equal steps up the chart are equal percentage gains. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 1,506 of the 3,628 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of UBER; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- NVDA$110,811+1,008% total · +61.8% a year
- GOOG$25,811+158% total · +20.9% a year
- META$21,571+116% total · +16.6% a year
- RACE$19,540+95.4% total · +14.3% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$19,000+90.0% total · +13.7% a year
- JOYY$18,790+87.9% total · +13.4% a year
- UBER$15,293+52.9% total · +8.9% a year
- TSLA$13,726+37.3% total · +6.5% a year
- DASH$8,911−10.9% total · −2.3% a year
- LYFT$2,801−72.0% total · −22.5% a year
UBER at a glance
This section summarizes the key facts about the stock, its returns over periods from one to ten years and the risk it has carried, with dividends reinvested throughout. These figures serve as the baseline for every comparison that follows.
Note: UBER began trading on May 10, 2019, so every figure here, including its worst decline, covers only the time since then. None of them reflect the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or five other sell-offs.
- UBER is still 31.1% below its all-time high.
- UBER's deepest decline since it began trading in 2019 was 68.0%, from June 2019 to March 2020. It took eight months from the low to climb back to its old high.
- Over six full calendar years, UBER's best was 2023, when it returned 149%, and its worst was 2022, when it lost 41.0%. It lost money in three of those years.
The company
- Market value
- $141B
- Industry
- Software - Application
- Price history from
- May 2019
Returns
- Past 1 year
- −26.4%total return
- Past 3 years
- +60.5%+17.1% a year
- Past 5 years
- +49.9%+8.4% a year
- Best calendar year
- +149%2023
- Worst calendar year
- −41.0%2022
- Losing years
- 3 of 6full calendar years
Risk
- Volatility
- 44.8%typical yearly swing, 5 years
- Sharpe ratio
- 0.40return per unit of risk, 5 years
- Worst decline ever
- −68.0%Jun 2019 to Mar 2020
- From its all-time high
- −31.1%below the peak
UBER against the whole market
Where UBER ranks among every stock and fund, and what across the market has done better.
How does UBER rank among all stocks?
This section ranks UBER on return, volatility, risk-adjusted return and worst decline against every stock worth at least $300 million with enough history. Where the comparisons with its popular alternatives show how UBER stacks up against its peers, these rankings show where it stands in the market as a whole.
- UBER's 1-year return ranks in the bottom 15% of the 3,287 stocks worth at least $300 million with 1 year of history.
Ranked against U.S.-listed stocks worth at least $300M that have enough history for each measure, so the count changes from row to row; smaller stocks are left out. Lower volatility and smaller declines rank higher.
| Measure | UBER | Rank | Standing |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | −26.4% | 2,780 of 3,287 | bottom 16% |
| 3-year return | +60.5% | 1,392 of 3,017 | top 46% |
| 5-year return | +49.9% | 1,094 of 2,893 | top 38% |
| Volatility, 5 years | 44.8% | 1,688 of 2,893 | bottom 43% |
| Sharpe ratio, 5 years | 0.40 | 1,224 of 2,893 | top 42% |
What has beaten UBER on both return and risk?
Each dot is an investment, placed by how much it earned a year over the past 5 years (higher is better) and how much its price swung, its volatility (further left is calmer). UBER sits where the dashed lines cross. Anything in the green box above and to the left earned more than UBER with smaller swings, a better trade-off over this period on both counts. Past results are no promise, but a name in the box is worth a closer look.
- 600 stocks and 408 ETFs worth at least $500 million sit in the green region: each earned more than UBER over the past 5 years with smaller price swings. That is 28% of the 3,633 screened.
- Among those with at least half UBER's swings, CAH has the best return for its risk: 42.1% a year at 24.7% volatility, 45% less than UBER's 44.8%, and a Sharpe ratio (return above cash per unit of volatility) of 1.55 against 0.40 for UBER. INSW earned the most, 56.5% a year, while still swinging less than UBER (40.5% against 44.8%).
- Among UBER's popular alternatives, GOOG is in the region. GOOG earned 19.0% a year against 8.4% a year for UBER, at 32.0% volatility, 29% less than UBER's 44.8%.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested, and volatility the annualized swing in daily prices, both over 5 years. Labeled dots are the strongest picks from the table below and the names called out above, colored by how close they sit to UBER; faint dots are 93 more of the 1,008 in the green region (the strongest, one per fund family). 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million were screened. Hover over a dot for its figures.
- Popular alternatives
- Same and neighboring categories, and shared themes
- The whole market
- Others in the green region
Is there a better investment than UBER?
Investments that beat UBER over the past 5 years on return, volatility, drawdowns, consistency, crash losses or fees, from its popular alternatives out to the whole market.
- Among UBER's popular alternatives, GOOG earned more than UBER with less volatility over the past 5 years: 19.0% a year at 32.0% volatility, against 8.4% a year at 44.8%.
- Looking beyond its popular alternatives, RACE (automobiles) earned more than UBER with less volatility over the past 5 years: 13.3% a year at 30.0% volatility, against 8.4% a year at 44.8%.
- Across the whole market, 1,008 of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than UBER with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them AAPL, GOOG and MSFT.
How this works
The table below lists investments that beat UBER over the past 5 years on at least one of these measures: a higher annual return with lower volatility, a higher annual return at similar volatility, a similar return with lower volatility, a higher Sharpe ratio with a smaller worst decline, a higher total return in most periods from 3 months to 10 years, or smaller losses in recent market crashes. It checks UBER's popular alternatives first, then the rest of its own and neighboring categories, then every stock and fund worth at least $500 million, and shows the strongest few in each group. The full list of those with a higher return and lower volatility than UBER follows the table.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested. Annual return, volatility and the Sharpe ratio cover 5 years; the worst decline covers the past 10 years. Green marks a better figure than UBER's. "On the frontier" means no other option shown or tested earned more with less volatility. Funds that hold the same thing are shown once. Beyond the popular alternatives, nothing with more than 1.5× UBER's volatility counts as better.
These figures cover the past 5 years. Green marks a better figure than UBER's.
| Investment | Why it is better | Past 5 years | Downside | Long run | Fit | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Annual return?higher is better | Volatility?lower is calmer | Sharpe?return per unit of risk | Worst decline?past 10 years | 5Y returntotal | Corr. with UBER?lower diversifies more | Expenseper year | |||
| +8.4% | 44.8% | 0.40 | −68.0% | +49.9% | 1.00 | — | |||
| +12.7% | 17.1% | 0.79 | −33.7% | +81.7% | 0.50 | 0.09% | |||
| Popular alternativesbest 1 shownThe investments people most often weigh against UBER. 1 of 12 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +19.0% | 32.0% | 0.71 | −44.6% | +138% | 0.19 | — | ||
| Same and neighboring categories, and shared themesbest 6 shownEverything else in Passenger Transportation and the categories next to it (Internet Services, Ride Hailing, Online Delivery, Automobiles), plus UBER's specific themes. 6 of 26 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineSmaller losses in recent crashes | +13.3% | 30.0% | 0.57 | −39.2% | +86.6% | 0.54 | — | ||
| Higher return, similar volatilityHigher return in most periods | +15.5% | 45.4% | 0.55 | −76.7% | +106% | 0.43 | — | ||
| Higher return in most periods | +58.0% | 51.9% | 1.14 | −66.3% | +884% | 0.44 | — | ||
GDDYGoDaddy Inc. · Internet Services | Similar return, lower volatilitySmaller losses in recent crashes | +9.3% | 35.8% | 0.43 | −65.0% | +55.8% | 0.42 | — | |
JOYYJOYY, Inc. Sponsored ADR Class A · Internet Services | Higher return in most periods | +13.3% | 58.0% | 0.49 | −83.5% | +87.0% | 0.06 | — | |
VRSNVeriSign, Inc. · Internet Services | Similar return, lower volatility | +7.8% | 25.9% | 0.42 | −38.9% | +45.7% | 0.18 | — | |
| The whole marketbest 8 shownEvery other stock and fund worth at least $500 million. 1,513 of 3,595 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| On the frontierHigher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +17.3% | 18.2% | 0.97 | −40.0% | +122% | 0.29 | — | ||
| On the frontierHigher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +42.1% | 24.7% | 1.55 | −46.1% | +479% | 0.41 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +18.5% | 28.0% | 0.75 | −38.5% | +133% | 0.30 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +12.5% | 28.2% | 0.56 | −37.1% | +80.3% | 0.30 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +40.7% | 32.8% | 1.21 | −34.5% | +451% | 0.12 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +11.5% | 17.5% | 0.71 | −35.0% | +72.6% | 0.52 | 0.03% | ||
| Higher return, similar volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +17.4% | 43.4% | 0.59 | −56.9% | +123% | 0.39 | — | ||
| Similar return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +9.3% | 16.9% | 0.61 | −35.8% | +55.9% | 0.43 | 0.03% | ||
What these numbers mean for UBER
- Annual return
- UBER returned 8.4% a year over the past 5 years with dividends reinvested, against 12.7% a year for the S&P 500. At that pace, $10,000 became about $15,000. Annual return is the steady yearly rate that would produce the same total result, so investments held over the same span compare fairly. Guide: What is performance and return? →
- Volatility
- UBER's volatility over the past 5 years was 44.8%, 2.6 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, UBER's return lands within 44.8% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump. Guide: Understanding and measuring risk (volatility) →
- Sharpe ratio
- UBER's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.40, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so UBER earned less for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings. Guide: Balancing reward with risk (Sharpe ratio) →
- Worst decline
- UBER's worst fall from a peak to a low over the past 10 years was 68.0%, against 33.7% for the S&P 500. Losses and gains are not symmetric: climbing back from a 68.0% fall takes a 213% gain. Guide: Market crash risk and tail risk →
- Correlation
- Over the past 5 years, UBER's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.50 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They often move together: some diversification next to an index fund, but not a cushion. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against UBER instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a UBER holding. Guide: Correlation and diversification →
Show all 1,008 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that earned more than UBER with less volatility
Out of 3,633 tested over 5 years. The strongest 100 are listed, best first, with funds that hold the same thing listed once.
| # | Investment | Found in | Annual return | Volatility | Sharpe | Worst decline | 5Y return | Corr. with UBER | Expense |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Whole market | +17.3% | 18.2% | 0.97 | −40.0% | +122% | 0.29 | — | |
| 2 | Whole market | +42.1% | 24.7% | 1.55 | −46.1% | +479% | 0.41 | — | |
| 3 | Whole market | +18.5% | 28.0% | 0.75 | −38.5% | +133% | 0.30 | — | |
| 4 | Whole market | +12.5% | 28.2% | 0.56 | −37.1% | +80.3% | 0.30 | — | |
| 5 | Whole market | +40.7% | 32.8% | 1.21 | −34.5% | +451% | 0.12 | — | |
| 6 | Whole market | +11.5% | 17.5% | 0.71 | −35.0% | +72.6% | 0.52 | 0.03% | |
| 7 | Whole market | +12.8% | 16.9% | 0.80 | −34.0% | +82.3% | 0.50 | 0.03% | |
| 8 | Whole market | +20.8% | 22.6% | 0.96 | −25.7% | +158% | 0.33 | — | |
| 9 | Whole market | +27.1% | 26.5% | 1.04 | −61.0% | +232% | -0.14 | — | |
| 10 | Whole market | +17.3% | 24.3% | 0.78 | −43.6% | +122% | 0.39 | — | |
| 11 | Whole market | +26.1% | 23.4% | 1.11 | −45.1% | +218% | 0.10 | — | |
| 12 | Whole market | +33.1% | 25.9% | 1.24 | −62.3% | +318% | 0.19 | — | |
| 13 | Whole market | +12.7% | 17.9% | 0.76 | −27.4% | +82.1% | 0.05 | — | |
| 14 | Whole market | +12.8% | 22.9% | 0.64 | −36.4% | +82.5% | 0.37 | — | |
| 15 | DXJWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund · International Equity | Whole market | +26.6% | 19.1% | 1.34 | −39.1% | +225% | 0.32 | 0.48% |
| 16 | LVHIFranklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +17.0% | 11.1% | 1.48 | −32.4% | +119% | 0.24 | 0.40% |
| 17 | Whole market | +14.7% | 16.8% | 0.91 | −37.0% | +98.2% | 0.13 | — | |
| 18 | Whole market | +31.1% | 31.9% | 1.01 | −43.4% | +288% | 0.25 | — | |
| 19 | Whole market | +17.4% | 22.9% | 0.82 | −31.4% | +123% | 0.52 | — | |
| 20 | Whole market | +14.5% | 23.0% | 0.71 | −35.1% | +97.2% | 0.51 | 0.18% | |
| 21 | Whole market | +33.2% | 29.4% | 1.13 | −54.9% | +319% | 0.13 | — | |
| 22 | Whole market | +12.4% | 23.8% | 0.61 | −41.0% | +79.2% | 0.36 | — | |
| 23 | Whole market | +21.0% | 23.4% | 0.94 | −42.9% | +159% | 0.09 | — | |
| 24 | Whole market | +16.8% | 26.1% | 0.73 | −42.0% | +118% | 0.20 | — | |
| 25 | Whole market | +38.7% | 25.0% | 1.44 | −38.1% | +413% | 0.10 | — | |
| 26 | Whole market | +17.1% | 20.7% | 0.87 | −26.8% | +121% | 0.13 | — | |
| 27 | INSWInternational Seaways, Inc. · Oil & Gas | Whole market | +56.5% | 40.5% | 1.31 | −57.4% | +839% | 0.03 | — |
| 28 | Whole market | +33.8% | 32.2% | 1.07 | −37.5% | +329% | 0.38 | — | |
| 29 | Whole market | +12.1% | 13.7% | 0.90 | −36.8% | +76.6% | 0.38 | 0.03% | |
| 30 | Whole market | +18.6% | 24.3% | 0.83 | −52.0% | +135% | -0.07 | — | |
| 31 | Whole market | +19.6% | 24.9% | 0.85 | −24.9% | +145% | -0.01 | — | |
| 32 | Whole market | +22.8% | 24.9% | 0.95 | −30.5% | +180% | -0.02 | — | |
| 33 | Whole market | +19.6% | 28.6% | 0.77 | −48.8% | +145% | 0.33 | — | |
| 34 | Whole market | +16.0% | 28.8% | 0.66 | −51.3% | +110% | 0.35 | — | |
| 35 | Whole market | +15.8% | 20.0% | 0.84 | −42.0% | +109% | 0.29 | — | |
| 36 | Whole market | +35.4% | 35.4% | 1.04 | −55.1% | +355% | 0.33 | — | |
| 37 | Whole market | +33.6% | 30.6% | 1.10 | −45.7% | +326% | 0.12 | — | |
| 38 | Whole market | +19.9% | 22.3% | 0.93 | −42.5% | +147% | 0.21 | — | |
| 39 | Whole market | +32.0% | 40.7% | 0.89 | −55.3% | +301% | 0.18 | — | |
| 40 | Whole market | +17.7% | 18.9% | 0.96 | −26.4% | +126% | 0.07 | 0.40% | |
| 41 | Whole market | +16.6% | 30.5% | 0.66 | −41.1% | +116% | 0.22 | — | |
| 42 | Whole market | +18.4% | 26.0% | 0.78 | −35.1% | +133% | 0.46 | 0.09% | |
| 43 | Whole market | +25.4% | 30.4% | 0.90 | −59.8% | +210% | 0.25 | — | |
| 44 | Whole market | +11.5% | 30.0% | 0.52 | −52.5% | +72.6% | 0.39 | — | |
| 45 | Whole market | +33.7% | 29.4% | 1.14 | −47.6% | +327% | 0.05 | — | |
| 46 | Whole market | +27.4% | 28.8% | 0.99 | −54.7% | +235% | 0.42 | — | |
| 47 | Whole market | +16.6% | 31.4% | 0.65 | −44.3% | +115% | 0.14 | — | |
| 48 | Whole market | +19.5% | 34.1% | 0.69 | −33.6% | +144% | 0.21 | — | |
| 49 | Whole market | +15.1% | 29.4% | 0.63 | −56.5% | +102% | 0.31 | — | |
| 50 | Whole market | +18.7% | 22.0% | 0.90 | −56.1% | +136% | -0.06 | — | |
| 51 | Whole market | +13.5% | 29.3% | 0.58 | −49.6% | +88.5% | 0.49 | — | |
| 52 | Whole market | +15.7% | 20.4% | 0.82 | −42.6% | +107% | 0.08 | — | |
| 53 | Whole market | +39.3% | 37.2% | 1.08 | −45.5% | +425% | 0.28 | — | |
| 54 | Whole market | +17.8% | 21.4% | 0.88 | −53.7% | +126% | 0.16 | — | |
| 55 | Whole market | +20.4% | 32.1% | 0.74 | −44.5% | +153% | 0.39 | — | |
| 56 | Whole market | +22.7% | 24.4% | 0.97 | −50.5% | +179% | 0.31 | — | |
| 57 | Whole market | +19.2% | 21.6% | 0.93 | −47.3% | +141% | 0.42 | — | |
| 58 | Whole market | +14.4% | 29.9% | 0.60 | −37.9% | +96.1% | 0.22 | — | |
| 59 | Whole market | +10.4% | 14.1% | 0.78 | −31.7% | +64.0% | 0.45 | 0.04% | |
| 60 | Whole market | +26.3% | 33.8% | 0.86 | −62.1% | +221% | 0.26 | — | |
| 61 | Whole market | +22.4% | 22.3% | 1.02 | −46.3% | +174% | 0.16 | — | |
| 62 | Whole market | +22.7% | 27.7% | 0.88 | −40.5% | +178% | 0.47 | — | |
| 63 | Whole market | +22.0% | 28.6% | 0.84 | −61.3% | +170% | 0.43 | — | |
| 64 | Whole market | +23.0% | 25.6% | 0.94 | −61.4% | +181% | -0.02 | — | |
| 65 | Whole market | +16.4% | 17.1% | 0.98 | −58.1% | +113% | 0.15 | — | |
| 66 | Whole market | +29.5% | 38.4% | 0.87 | −54.2% | +264% | 0.12 | — | |
| 67 | Whole market | +24.2% | 22.8% | 1.07 | −32.4% | +195% | 0.31 | — | |
| 68 | Whole market | +9.7% | 14.3% | 0.72 | −33.4% | +59.1% | 0.29 | 0.06% | |
| 69 | Whole market | +13.6% | 21.4% | 0.71 | −51.0% | +89.4% | 0.25 | — | |
| 70 | Whole market | +22.6% | 24.0% | 0.97 | −57.5% | +177% | 0.41 | — | |
| 71 | Whole market | +26.3% | 24.9% | 1.07 | −41.6% | +221% | 0.31 | — | |
| 72 | Whole market | +12.9% | 19.9% | 0.71 | −46.9% | +83.1% | 0.34 | — | |
| 73 | Whole market | +12.2% | 29.0% | 0.54 | −37.5% | +77.9% | 0.12 | — | |
| 74 | Whole market | +18.6% | 39.1% | 0.63 | −62.4% | +135% | 0.04 | — | |
| 75 | Whole market | +21.0% | 26.8% | 0.85 | −50.8% | +160% | 0.55 | — | |
| 76 | Whole market | +17.2% | 24.9% | 0.77 | −30.4% | +121% | 0.15 | — | |
| 77 | Whole market | +33.4% | 36.9% | 0.97 | −45.3% | +323% | 0.40 | 0.35% | |
| 78 | Whole market | +32.9% | 42.2% | 0.89 | −56.9% | +315% | 0.18 | — | |
| 79 | Whole market | +18.7% | 22.5% | 0.88 | −55.1% | +136% | 0.12 | — | |
| 80 | Whole market | +10.3% | 16.2% | 0.69 | −34.2% | +63.3% | 0.52 | 0.06% | |
| 81 | Whole market | +16.5% | 23.1% | 0.78 | −48.4% | +115% | 0.32 | — | |
| 82 | Whole market | +19.0% | 20.8% | 0.95 | −54.9% | +139% | 0.18 | — | |
| 83 | Whole market | +17.4% | 29.1% | 0.70 | −46.4% | +123% | 0.38 | — | |
| 84 | Whole market | +14.1% | 30.1% | 0.59 | −54.7% | +93.6% | 0.29 | — | |
| 85 | Whole market | +13.9% | 18.5% | 0.80 | −34.0% | +91.5% | 0.41 | — | |
| 86 | Whole market | +18.1% | 29.5% | 0.71 | −51.4% | +129% | 0.34 | — | |
| 87 | Whole market | +14.8% | 23.6% | 0.71 | −32.8% | +99.4% | 0.33 | — | |
| 88 | Whole market | +27.5% | 36.9% | 0.85 | −46.7% | +236% | 0.08 | — | |
| 89 | Whole market | +23.4% | 30.2% | 0.85 | −57.5% | +186% | 0.16 | — | |
| 90 | Whole market | +12.7% | 27.7% | 0.57 | −50.8% | +82.1% | 0.15 | — | |
| 91 | ESLTElbit Systems Ltd. · Aerospace & Defense | Whole market | +39.8% | 34.6% | 1.15 | −35.4% | +435% | 0.09 | — |
| 92 | Whole market | +11.8% | 22.6% | 0.61 | −39.2% | +74.5% | 0.27 | — | |
| 93 | Whole market | +19.2% | 22.4% | 0.90 | −42.0% | +141% | 0.11 | — | |
| 94 | Whole market | +19.7% | 23.2% | 0.90 | −48.8% | +146% | 0.09 | — | |
| 95 | Whole market | +12.4% | 20.2% | 0.68 | −32.9% | +79.4% | 0.17 | — | |
| 96 | Whole market | +17.0% | 26.2% | 0.73 | −41.4% | +119% | 0.09 | — | |
| 97 | Whole market | +16.4% | 28.0% | 0.69 | −62.6% | +114% | 0.48 | — | |
| 98 | Whole market | +18.9% | 37.3% | 0.65 | −53.9% | +138% | 0.06 | — | |
| 99 | Whole market | +15.8% | 24.6% | 0.72 | −30.7% | +108% | 0.31 | — | |
| 100 | Whole market | +21.7% | 37.4% | 0.72 | −57.2% | +167% | 0.42 | — |
UBER against its popular alternatives
The investments people most often weigh against UBER, compared period by period and year by year.
How do UBER's risk and return compare with its alternatives?
This map plots each investment's annual return over the past 5 years against its volatility, the size of its typical price swings. Investments toward the upper left earned more for a smoother ride, and those toward the lower right earned less for a rougher one. The dashed lines cross at UBER, which divides the map into what did better or worse on each measure.
- Only GOOG was both more rewarding and calmer than UBER over the past 5 years, earning a higher annual return with lower volatility.
- Eight of the 12 popular alternatives earned less than UBER over the past 5 years while swinging more, the weaker corner of the map.
- Over the past 5 years, UBER returned 8.4% a year, less than the S&P 500's 12.7%, with higher volatility (44.8% against 17.1%).
Green points earned more than UBER with less volatility; red points earned less with more. Hover over a point for its figures. Total returns with dividends reinvested, annualized.
All figures
| Investment | Annual return | Volatility |
|---|---|---|
| GOOG Alphabet Inc. | +19.0% | 32.0% |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | +12.7% | 17.1% |
| UBER This pageUber Technologies, Inc. | +8.4% | 44.8% |
| TSLA Tesla, Inc. | +5.3% | 60.0% |
| ABNB Airbnb, Inc. | +0.8% | 44.3% |
| DASH DoorDash, Inc. | −2.3% | 54.5% |
| ZTO ZTO Express (Cayman) Inc. | −6.3% | 38.2% |
| ACHR Archer Aviation Inc. | −9.8% | 86.3% |
| YMM Full Truck Alliance Co. Ltd. | −10.9% | 65.7% |
| GPN Global Payments Inc. | −11.2% | 36.9% |
| JOBY Joby Aviation, Inc. | −12.6% | 77.7% |
| LYFT Lyft, Inc. | −19.0% | 67.4% |
| GRAB Grab Holdings Limited | −22.3% | 60.5% |
| BILI Bilibili Inc. | −29.9% | 77.4% |
Has UBER consistently beaten its popular alternatives?
This section compares UBER with the investments people most often weigh against it, checking each one over seven periods from one month to five years. Counting how often an alternative earned more than UBER helps separate lasting outperformance from a single strong stretch.
- Only one of the 14 popular alternatives, GOOG, outperformed UBER in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 2 long-term timeframes.
- GOOG earned more for the risk it took than UBER (a higher Sharpe ratio) and fell less in its worst decline of the past 10 years.
A green cell means the alternative earned more than UBER over that period. "Qualified" marks those that did so in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 2 long-term periods.
| Investment | Periods outperformed | Short term | Long term | Risk · 5 years | Fund | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1M | 3M | 6M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | Volatilitylower is calmer | Sharpehigher is better | Worst declinepast 10 years | Expense | Assets | Overlapsame sectors | ||
| UBER Uber Technologies, Inc. (this page) | — | −2.7% | −4.5% | −11.0% | −16.8% | −26.4% | +60.5% | +49.9% | 44.8% | 0.40 | −68.0% | — | $141B | — |
| GOOG QualifiedAlphabet Inc. | 3/5 short2/2 long | −4.1% | −4.2% | +0.4% | +6.9% | +31.2% | +148% | +138% | 32.0% | 0.71 | −44.6% | — | $4.1T | — |
| TSLA Auto - ManufacturersTesla, Inc. | 5/5 short1/2 long | −0.4% | +1.1% | −4.8% | −14.7% | −16.5% | +76.3% | +29.5% | 60.0% | 0.39 | −73.6% | — | $1.5T | — |
| LYFT Software - ApplicationLyft, Inc. | 5/5 short1/2 long | +13.0% | +11.8% | +19.6% | −12.8% | −14.6% | +70.8% | −65.1% | 67.4% | 0.03 | −89.8% | — | $6.5B | — |
| CART Software - ServicesMaplebear Inc. | 5/5 short1/2 long | +11.4% | +8.6% | +15.3% | +15.6% | +30.3% | +104% | — | — | — | −38.0% | — | $12B | — |
| DASH Internet Content & InformationDoorDash, Inc. | 4/5 short1/2 long | −1.1% | +1.4% | +1.0% | −12.8% | −27.8% | +162% | −11.1% | 54.5% | 0.23 | −82.5% | — | $83B | — |
| ABNB Travel ServicesAirbnb, Inc. | 5/5 short0/2 long | +6.1% | +22.1% | +23.2% | +33.0% | +39.1% | +51.9% | +4.2% | 44.3% | 0.24 | −62.0% | — | $106B | — |
| GPN Financial - Credit ServicesGlobal Payments Inc. | 5/5 short0/2 long | −0.6% | +3.3% | +17.2% | +13.4% | −1.3% | −21.1% | −44.7% | 36.9% | -0.14 | −70.2% | — | $22B | — |
| ZTO Integrated Freight & LogisticsZTO Express (Cayman) Inc. | 3/5 short0/2 long | +4.0% | −16.3% | −20.0% | −4.3% | +7.5% | −5.6% | −27.7% | 38.2% | 0.02 | −57.1% | — | $15B | — |
| YMM Software - ApplicationFull Truck Alliance Co. Ltd. | 3/5 short0/2 long | +8.9% | −3.5% | +1.4% | −19.0% | −28.1% | +38.1% | −44.0% | 65.7% | 0.14 | −78.3% | — | $9.2B | — |
| GRAB Software - ApplicationGrab Holdings Limited | 1/5 short0/2 long | −0.7% | −20.2% | −31.4% | −43.1% | −49.0% | −11.6% | −71.6% | 60.5% | -0.11 | −86.5% | — | $11B | — |
| MBLY Auto - PartsMobileye Global Inc. | 1/5 short0/2 long | −8.6% | −18.4% | −9.2% | −35.0% | −50.3% | −79.5% | — | — | — | −86.1% | — | $6.2B | — |
| ACHR Aerospace & DefenseArcher Aviation Inc. | 0/5 short0/2 long | −26.7% | −25.0% | −34.9% | −51.0% | −66.8% | −18.3% | −40.4% | 86.3% | 0.30 | −90.5% | — | $3.1B | — |
| JOBY Airlines, Airports & Air ServicesJoby Aviation, Inc. | 0/5 short0/2 long | −27.5% | −37.8% | −49.1% | −67.6% | −73.3% | −19.1% | −48.8% | 77.7% | 0.20 | −79.8% | — | $4.6B | — |
| BILI Internet Content & InformationBilibili Inc. | 0/5 short0/2 long | −8.3% | −24.4% | −44.3% | −47.2% | −49.5% | +11.3% | −83.1% | 77.4% | -0.09 | −94.3% | — | $5.9B | — |
How did UBER do year by year?
This table shows each investment's total return in every full calendar year since 2020, along with where UBER ranked among its popular alternatives each year. Annual results reveal how consistently each one kept pace with UBER and how far its good and bad years diverged, detail that multiyear averages tend to smooth over.
Note: UBER began trading on May 10, 2019, so the table starts with 2020, its first full calendar year, and cannot show how it fared during the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or five other sell-offs.
- UBER finished ahead of the S&P 500 in three of its six full calendar years.
- Among its popular alternatives, GOOG came out ahead of UBER most often, in four of the six years both traded.
- Ranked against its popular alternatives each year, UBER finished in the top quarter in one of six years and in the bottom quarter in no. In 2025, it ranked 5 of 15.
Newest year first. Green marks a year in which the fund came out ahead of UBER; gray means the two finished within a fraction of a point. The rank row places UBER among the alternatives that traded the full year; dark green is the top quarter and red the bottom quarter.
| Investment | Years ahead of UBER | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UBER This pageUber Technologies, Inc. | — | +35.5% | −2.0% | +149% | −41.0% | −17.8% | +71.5% |
| Rank among alternatives | Top quarter in 1 of 6 | 5 of 15 | 10 of 15 | 2 of 14 | 5 of 13 | 7 of 12 | 3 of 7 |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 3 of 6 | +17.7% | +24.9% | +26.2% | −18.2% | +28.7% | +18.3% |
| GOOG Alphabet Inc. | 4 of 6 | +65.4% | +35.6% | +58.8% | −38.7% | +65.2% | +31.0% |
| TSLA Tesla, Inc. | 3 of 6 | +11.4% | +62.5% | +102% | −65.0% | +49.8% | +743% |
| LYFT Lyft, Inc. | 2 of 6 | +50.2% | −13.9% | +36.0% | −74.2% | −13.0% | +14.2% |
| CART Maplebear Inc. | 1 of 2 | +8.6% | +76.5% | — | — | — | — |
| DASH DoorDash, Inc. | 2 of 5 | +35.0% | +69.6% | +103% | −67.2% | +4.3% | — |
| ABNB Airbnb, Inc. | 1 of 5 | +3.3% | −3.5% | +59.2% | −48.6% | +13.4% | — |
| GPN Global Payments Inc. | 1 of 6 | −30.1% | −11.0% | +29.0% | −25.9% | −36.9% | +18.5% |
| ZTO ZTO Express (Cayman) Inc. | 2 of 6 | +10.7% | −3.7% | −19.8% | −3.8% | −2.4% | +26.2% |
| YMM Full Truck Alliance Co. Ltd. | 2 of 4 | +0.8% | +57.4% | −12.3% | −4.5% | — | — |
| GRAB Grab Holdings Limited | 1 of 5 | +5.7% | +40.1% | +4.7% | −54.8% | −44.6% | — |
| MBLY Mobileye Global Inc. | 0 of 3 | −47.6% | −54.0% | +23.6% | — | — | — |
| ACHR Archer Aviation Inc. | 2 of 5 | −22.9% | +58.8% | +228% | −69.0% | −40.0% | — |
| JOBY Joby Aviation, Inc. | 2 of 5 | +62.4% | +22.3% | +98.5% | −54.1% | −36.9% | — |
| BILI Bilibili Inc. | 2 of 6 | +35.8% | +48.8% | −48.6% | −48.9% | −45.9% | +360% |
Risk and diversification
How UBER has fallen, how it held up in crashes beside the S&P 500 and its popular alternatives, and what moves independently of it.
What were UBER's worst declines?
A drawdown is the decline from a peak to the lowest point before a new high. This section presents UBER's five deepest drawdowns since it began trading in 2019, alongside the S&P 500's return over the same dates, and how long each took to recover. Together, these figures show how much an investor could have lost and how long it took to get back to even.
Note: UBER began trading on May 10, 2019, so this list cannot include the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or five other sell-offs. The crash tests on this page show how older funds and the S&P 500 fared through those years.
- In all five of UBER's worst declines, the S&P 500 held up better over the same dates.
- Not every decline was the market's doing: UBER fell 67.6% from February 2021 to June 2022, while the S&P 500 slipped only 1.3%.
- The longest climb back to a previous high took 18 months, after UBER fell 67.6% from February 2021 to June 2022.
Green means UBER fell less than the S&P 500 over the same dates. Based on daily closing prices with dividends reinvested.
| During | UBER fell | S&P 500, same dates | Peak | Low | Time to the low | Back at the peak | Time to recover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Covid crash | −68.0% | −17.3% | Jun 2019 | Mar 2020 | 9 months | Nov 2020 | 8 months |
| 2022 bear market | −67.6% | −1.3% | Feb 2021 | Jun 2022 | 16 months | Dec 2023 | 18 months |
| No named crash | −34.1% | +10.9% | Oct 2025 | Jul 2026 | 9 months | Not yet | — |
| No named crash | −30.6% | +4.3% | Oct 2024 | Dec 2024 | 2 months | May 2025 | 5 months |
| No named crash | −28.1% | +3.7% | Feb 2024 | Aug 2024 | 6 months | Oct 2024 | 2 months |
How did UBER do in stock market crashes?
This section measures how far UBER, the S&P 500 and each alternative fell from peak to trough during every major market crash since 2000. A smaller decline means an investment held up better, and comparing results across crashes shows whether that resilience was consistent or a one-off.
Note: UBER began trading on May 10, 2019, so its row reads "Not yet trading" for the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or five other sell-offs. The older alternatives and the S&P 500 show how those crashes played out.
- UBER fell further than the S&P 500 in all three crashes it has traded through. The clearest case was the Covid crash, when UBER fell 63.9% and the S&P 500 fell 33.7%.
- Among its popular alternatives, GOOG held up best, falling less than UBER in all three crashes they both traded through.
- UBER began trading after the 2008 financial crisis, but two of its popular alternatives lived through it. The mildest fall among them was GPN's 44.4%, against 55.2% for the S&P 500.
Newest crash first. Each figure is the fund's deepest fall within the crash window; green means a smaller fall than UBER.
| Investment | Held up better | 2023 regional bank crisisMar 2023 | 2022 bear marketJan 2022 | Covid crashFeb 2020 | Late-2018 sell-offSep 2018 | February 2018 volatility shockFeb 2018 | 2015 China and oil sell-offAug 2015 | 2011 euro debt crisisJul 2011 | 2010 flash crashMay 2010 | 2008 financial crisisOct 2007 | Dot-com bustMar 2000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UBER This pageUber Technologies, Inc. | — | −9.4% | −53.9% | −63.9% | Not yet trading | Not yet trading | Not yet trading | Not yet trading | Not yet trading | Not yet trading | Not yet trading |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 3 of 3 | −3.4% | −24.5% | −33.7% | −19.3% | −6.5% | −12.8% | −17.9% | −1.5% | −55.2% | −47.5% |
| GOOG Alphabet Inc. | 3 of 3 | −3.9% | −35.0% | −30.8% | −18.9% | −9.9% | −12.7% | −21.1% | −1.1% | −65.3% | — |
| TSLA Tesla, Inc. | 3 of 3 | −5.0% | −45.4% | −60.6% | −21.6% | −10.0% | −45.6% | −25.1% | — | — | — |
| LYFT Lyft, Inc. | 0 of 3 | −13.7% | −74.9% | −65.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| DASH DoorDash, Inc. | 1 of 2 | −8.5% | −68.8% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ABNB Airbnb, Inc. | 2 of 2 | −7.2% | −52.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| GPN Global Payments Inc. | 2 of 3 | −11.9% | −29.2% | −44.3% | −25.4% | −7.5% | −27.8% | −18.6% | −5.7% | −44.4% | — |
| ZTO ZTO Express (Cayman) Inc. | 3 of 3 | −2.4% | −33.6% | −14.7% | −16.8% | −4.5% | — | — | — | — | — |
| YMM Full Truck Alliance Co. Ltd. | 2 of 2 | −7.1% | −52.8% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| GRAB Grab Holdings Limited | 0 of 2 | −9.8% | −68.2% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| MBLY Mobileye Global Inc. | 1 of 1 | −3.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ACHR Archer Aviation Inc. | 0 of 2 | −9.8% | −56.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| JOBY Joby Aviation, Inc. | 2 of 2 | −5.9% | −49.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| BILI Bilibili Inc. | 2 of 3 | −8.0% | −70.2% | −28.2% | −17.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
How closely does UBER move with the S&P 500?
Upside capture measures how much of the S&P 500's gains an investment kept in the months the market rose, and downside capture how much of its losses it took in the months the market fell. An investment that captures more of the gains than the losses has compounded ahead of the market over time. This section compares UBER with its popular alternatives on both measures, and on beta (how strongly each has moved with the market), over the past 5 years.
- Only GOOG had a higher capture ratio (upside capture divided by downside capture) than UBER's 0.80, out of 12 popular alternatives with the same record.
- Over the past 5 years, UBER captured 99% of the S&P 500's gains in rising months and 124% of its losses in falling months, with a beta of 1.26. Its share of the market's losses was larger than its share of the gains.
Monthly total returns over the past 5 years, measured against SPY. 100% capture or a beta of 1.00 means moving in line with the S&P 500. Green marks a better figure than UBER's: more upside, less downside or a higher capture ratio. Sorted by capture ratio.
| Investment | Upside capture | Downside capture | Capture ratio | Beta |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| UBER This pageUber Technologies, Inc. | 99% | 124% | 0.80 | 1.26 |
| GOOG Alphabet Inc. | 140% | 132% | 1.07 | 1.20 |
| TSLA Tesla, Inc. | 134% | 196% | 0.68 | 1.90 |
| DASH DoorDash, Inc. | 143% | 261% | 0.55 | 1.89 |
| ABNB Airbnb, Inc. | 69% | 130% | 0.53 | 1.23 |
| JOBY Joby Aviation, Inc. | 168% | 344% | 0.49 | 2.66 |
| ACHR Archer Aviation Inc. | 174% | 362% | 0.48 | 3.28 |
| GPN Global Payments Inc. | 46% | 158% | 0.29 | 0.80 |
| LYFT Lyft, Inc. | 81% | 292% | 0.28 | 1.95 |
| BILI Bilibili Inc. | 9% | 197% | 0.05 | 0.65 |
| YMM Full Truck Alliance Co. Ltd. | -6% | 58% | -0.11 | 0.22 |
| GRAB Grab Holdings Limited | -19% | 112% | -0.17 | 0.90 |
| ZTO ZTO Express (Cayman) Inc. | -21% | 2% | -8.76 | -0.20 |
What diversifies UBER?
Correlation measures how closely two investments move together, on a scale from 1 (in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to -1 (in opposite directions). This section lists large ETFs and stocks whose returns have had a low correlation with UBER's. Because such investments tend not to fall at the same time, pairing UBER with them can reduce a portfolio's overall swings.
- Moving a fifth of the money in UBER into GLD would have cut the portfolio's volatility by 19% over the past 5 years and raised its annual return (+8.9% for UBER alone, +12.2% for the mix).
- MCK made money in three of the three calendar years in which UBER lost money.
- Among large ETFs, LVHI, DXJ and EMLP have moved largely independently of UBER over the past 5 years, with correlations of 0.32 or lower, and each still earned a positive 5-year return.
Only ETFs with at least $1.0B in assets and stocks worth at least $10B, with a correlation below 0.5 over the past 5 years and a positive return, are included, ranked by Sharpe ratio; funds that hold the same thing are shown once. The year columns are the years in which UBER lost money. The last two columns show a portfolio that is 80% UBER and 20% the other investment, rebalanced monthly.
ETFs
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2024 | 2022 | 2021 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UBER Uber Technologies, Inc. (this page) | 1.00 | +49.9% | 0.40 | −2.0% | −41.0% | −17.8% | 39.4% | +8.9% |
| LVHI InternationalFranklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 0.24 | +119% | 1.48 | +15.9% | +3.8% | +17.8% | 32.0% | +11.7% |
| DXJ InternationalWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund | 0.32 | +225% | 1.34 | +29.8% | +6.0% | +18.0% | 32.4% | +13.5% |
| EMLP Broad MarketFirst Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund | 0.24 | +101% | 1.04 | +33.4% | +10.4% | +23.1% | 32.3% | +11.4% |
| HDV Dividend & IncomeiShares Core High Dividend ETF | 0.20 | +83.3% | 1.00 | +14.1% | +7.1% | +19.6% | 32.2% | +10.8% |
| FTLS Broad MarketFirst Trust Long/Short Equity ETF | 0.41 | +62.9% | 0.99 | +18.8% | −5.6% | +19.7% | 32.2% | +10.4% |
| SMH TechnologyVanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.40 | +323% | 0.97 | +39.1% | −33.5% | +42.1% | 34.9% | +15.6% |
| DBEF InternationalXtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF | 0.44 | +85.0% | 0.96 | +13.4% | −5.1% | +19.6% | 32.5% | +10.9% |
| GLD CommoditiesSPDR Gold Shares | 0.07 | +126% | 0.96 | +26.7% | −0.8% | −4.2% | 31.9% | +12.2% |
Stocks
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2024 | 2022 | 2021 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UBER Uber Technologies, Inc. (this page) | 1.00 | +49.9% | 0.40 | −2.0% | −41.0% | −17.8% | 39.4% | +8.9% |
| CAH Medical - DistributionCardinal Health, Inc. | 0.41 | +479% | 1.55 | +19.0% | +54.1% | −0.4% | 34.0% | +15.4% |
| CLS Hardware, Equipment & PartsCelestica Inc. | 0.29 | +3,143% | 1.47 | +215% | +1.3% | +37.9% | 36.7% | +27.7% |
| FIX Engineering & ConstructionComfort Systems USA, Inc. | 0.21 | +1,636% | 1.46 | +107% | +17.0% | +89.0% | 34.5% | +24.2% |
| MCK Medical - DistributionMcKesson Corporation | 0.10 | +413% | 1.44 | +23.7% | +51.8% | +44.2% | 32.4% | +15.3% |
| MPC Oil & Gas Refining & MarketingMarathon Petroleum Corporation | 0.11 | +690% | 1.41 | −4.0% | +86.6% | +61.0% | 32.8% | +17.9% |
Common questions
What was UBER's worst drawdown?
UBER's deepest decline since it began trading in 2019 was 68.0%, from June 2019 to March 2020. It took eight months from the low to climb back to its old high. Because UBER launched in May 2019, that record does not include the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or five other sell-offs.
What were UBER's best and worst years?
Over six full calendar years, UBER's best year was 2023, when it returned 149%. Its worst was 2022, with a return of -41.0%.
Is there a better investment than UBER?
Among UBER's popular alternatives, GOOG earned more than UBER with less volatility over the past 5 years: 19.0% a year at 32.0% volatility, against 8.4% a year at 44.8%. Looking beyond its popular alternatives, RACE (automobiles) earned more than UBER with less volatility over the past 5 years: 13.3% a year at 30.0% volatility, against 8.4% a year at 44.8%.
Is UBER more volatile than the S&P 500?
Yes. UBER's volatility over the past 5 years was 44.8%, 2.6 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, UBER's return lands within 44.8% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump.
What is UBER's Sharpe ratio?
UBER's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.40, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so UBER earned less for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings.
How correlated is UBER with the S&P 500?
Over the past 5 years, UBER's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.50 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They often move together: some diversification next to an index fund, but not a cushion. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against UBER instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a UBER holding.
What are the best alternatives to UBER?
Of the 14 popular alternatives we compared, one outperformed UBER in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 2 long-term timeframes, with dividends reinvested: GOOG.
Did UBER outperform the S&P 500?
UBER finished ahead of the S&P 500 (SPY) in three of six full calendar years. In 2025, it returned +35.5%, against +17.7% for the index.
How did UBER do in stock market crashes?
UBER fell less than the S&P 500 (SPY) in none of the three major crashes it has traded through, and further in three. The clearest case was the Covid crash, when UBER fell 63.9% and the S&P 500 fell 33.7%.
What diversifies UBER?
These had a low correlation with UBER over the past 5 years and still earned a positive 5-year return: among large ETFs, LVHI (correlation 0.24), DXJ (correlation 0.32) and EMLP (correlation 0.24); among large stocks, CAH (correlation 0.41), CLS (correlation 0.29) and FIX (correlation 0.21). A correlation near zero means the two have moved largely independently.
How we measure
- Short-term periods are 1M, 3M, 6M, YTD, 1Y; long-term periods are 3Y, 5Y. An investment outperformed in a period when its total return, with dividends reinvested, was higher than UBER's. Returns within 0.5 points or 3% of UBER's, whichever is larger, count as a tie.
- "Qualified" means outperforming in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 2 long-term periods. "All-weather" means outperforming in every long-term period and all but one short-term period.
- Popular alternatives are the funds and stocks most often compared with this one. We include only those that trade today, are not leveraged or inverse, and hold at least $200 million.
- Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily returns over 5 years, a measure of how much the price typically swings in a year. The Sharpe ratio is the return above cash for each unit of that volatility.
- A decline, or drawdown, runs from a peak to the lowest close before the next high. The worst decline ever uses all the price history we have; comparisons between funds use the past 10 years so that younger funds are judged on the same stretch.
- Sector overlap is the share of assets two funds hold in the same sectors. Correlation and the mixed-portfolio figures use monthly returns.
- Upside and downside capture follow Morningstar's definition: the compound monthly return in the months the S&P 500 rose (or fell), divided by the S&P 500's compound return in those months. Beta measures how strongly monthly returns have moved with the S&P 500. All three use the same window for every investment.
- Figures are computed from daily adjusted prices and update after each trading day. Past performance does not predict future results.