Relative Intelligence · Online Delivery

How DoorDash (DASH) compares with the whole market and its popular alternatives
Built by QuantCommons' quantitative engine, this page is about relative opportunity, not data on DASH alone. It places DASH (DoorDash, Inc.) against 15 popular alternatives, its neighboring categories and the entire market of over 10,000 U.S.-listed stocks and ETFs, and surfaces what has done better on consistent outperformance, return for the risk taken, behavior in real market crashes and diversification. The result is a clearer view of where DASH stands in the market, and of the alternatives worth a closer look.
Period covered: DASH's full trading record, from December 2020 through September 2026. The crash tests reach back to 2000 using older funds and the S&P 500. All returns include reinvested dividends. Data as of October 20, 2026.
Data as of October 20, 2026. Full tables and charts read best on a larger screen.
On this page12 sections
Key findings
- Right nowThe slide is DASH's own: it is 32.0% below its high, against 1.3% for the S&P 500. DASH has trailed the market, rising 1.0% over the past 6 months against 9.1% for the S&P 500 and 11.2% for the Nasdaq 100. At a glance ↓
- Stock or market?DASH rose 1.4% over the past 3 months, in line with the communication services sector ETF XLC (State Street Communication Services Select Sector SPDR ETF), which fell 0.2%. The S&P 500 rose 3.9%. Its online delivery peers did not move as one over the past 3 months: CART (Maplebear) rose 8.6%, while BABA (Alibaba Group Holding) fell 9.7%.
- Past 1 to 3 yearsOver the past year, DASH fell 27.8% while the S&P 500 rose 15.8%. Even so, the past 3 years (ahead of 82% of the stocks worth at least $300 million) have been far stronger than the record over 5 years (behind 65% of them). By year ↓
- Long termDASH turned $10,000 into $8,890 over the past 5 years, against $18,200 in the S&P 500. Growth of $10,000 ↓
- In a crashIn the 2022 bear market, DASH fell 68.8%, against 24.5% for the S&P 500. That was more than AMZN (Amazon.com, 39.6%) but less than SE (Sea, 73.3%). Crash tests ↓
- DiversificationAgainst the S&P 500, DASH has a correlation of 0.61 over 5 years, more closely than 92% of stocks worth at least $300 million. Next to an index fund it is more of the same, not a cushion. Market capture ↓
- Better options
- Nearby categories and themes
- EBAY (e-commerce) and CAKE (Cheesecake Factory, restaurants) earned more than DASH with less volatility over the past 5 years. EBAY returned 11.7% a year at 32.9% volatility, against a loss of 2.3% a year at 54.5%.
- Versus the S&P 500
- Simply owning the S&P 500 would have done better over the past 5 years: 12.7% a year at 17.1% volatility, against 2.3% at 54.5% for DASH.
- Whole market
- 2,341 of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than DASH with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them AAPL (Apple), GOOG (Alphabet) and MSFT (Microsoft).
How much would $10,000 in DASH have grown?
This chart tracks a hypothetical $10,000 investment in DASH over the past 5 years, with dividends reinvested, alongside the same amount in the S&P 500, investments that ended ahead of DASH over the same span and DASH's popular alternatives, among those that traded for the entire period. It shows not only where each investment ended up but also how smooth or uneven the path was.
Note: DASH began trading on December 9, 2020, so the chart cannot reach back to the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or six other sell-offs. It covers the most recent 5 years of DASH's record, starting at the end of September 2021.
- $10,000 invested in DASH at the end of September 2021 would have grown to $8,911 by September 2026, less than the $19,000 it would have become in SPY, an S&P 500 fund.
- Six of the eight other investments on the chart ended ahead of DASH, and UBER finished highest, at $15,293.
From the end of September 2021 to the end of September 2026. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 2,779 of the 3,628 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of DASH; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- SPY (S&P 500)$19,000+90.0% total · +13.7% a year
- UBER$15,293+52.9% total · +8.9% a year
- AMZN$15,169+51.7% total · +8.7% a year
- YUM$12,260+22.6% total · +4.2% a year
- MCD$10,761+7.6% total · +1.5% a year
- MELI$10,293+2.9% total · +0.6% a year
- SBUX$9,590−4.1% total · −0.8% a year
- DASH$8,911−10.9% total · −2.3% a year
- TOST$5,804−42.0% total · −10.3% a year
- LYFT$2,801−72.0% total · −22.5% a year
DASH at a glance
This section summarizes the key facts about the stock, its returns over periods from one to ten years and the risk it has carried, with dividends reinvested throughout. These figures serve as the baseline for every comparison that follows.
Note: DASH began trading on December 9, 2020, so every figure here, including its worst decline, covers only the time since then. None of them reflect the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or six other sell-offs.
- DASH is still 32.0% below its all-time high.
- DASH's deepest decline since it began trading in 2020 was 82.5%, from November 2021 to October 2022. It took about three years from the low to climb back to its old high.
- Over five full calendar years, DASH's best was 2023, when it returned 103%, and its worst was 2022, when it lost 67.2%. It lost money in one of those years.
The company
- Market value
- $83B
- Industry
- Internet Content & Information
- Price history from
- December 2020
Returns
- Past 1 year
- −27.8%total return
- Past 3 years
- +162%+37.9% a year
- Past 5 years
- −11.1%−2.3% a year
- Best calendar year
- +103%2023
- Worst calendar year
- −67.2%2022
- Losing years
- 1 of 5full calendar years
Risk
- Volatility
- 54.5%typical yearly swing, 5 years
- Sharpe ratio
- 0.23return per unit of risk, 5 years
- Worst decline ever
- −82.5%Nov 2021 to Oct 2022
- From its all-time high
- −32.0%below the peak
DASH against the whole market
Where DASH ranks among every stock and fund, and what across the market has done better.
How does DASH rank among all stocks?
This section ranks DASH on return, volatility, risk-adjusted return and worst decline against every stock worth at least $300 million with enough history. Where the comparisons with its popular alternatives show how DASH stacks up against its peers, these rankings show where it stands in the market as a whole.
- DASH's 3-year return ranks in the top 18% of the 3,017 stocks worth at least $300 million with 3 years of history.
- DASH's 1-year return ranks in the bottom 15% of the 3,287 stocks worth at least $300 million with 1 year of history.
Ranked against U.S.-listed stocks worth at least $300M that have enough history for each measure, so the count changes from row to row; smaller stocks are left out. Lower volatility and smaller declines rank higher.
| Measure | DASH | Rank | Standing |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | −27.8% | 2,808 of 3,287 | bottom 16% |
| 3-year return | +162% | 530 of 3,017 | top 18% |
| 5-year return | −11.1% | 1,888 of 2,893 | bottom 36% |
| Volatility, 5 years | 54.5% | 2,098 of 2,893 | bottom 28% |
| Sharpe ratio, 5 years | 0.23 | 1,769 of 2,893 | bottom 40% |
What has beaten DASH on both return and risk?
Each dot is an investment, placed by how much it earned a year over the past 5 years (higher is better) and how much its price swung, its volatility (further left is calmer). DASH sits where the dashed lines cross. Anything in the green box above and to the left earned more than DASH with smaller swings, a better trade-off over this period on both counts. Past results are no promise, but a name in the box is worth a closer look.
- 1,380 stocks and 961 ETFs worth at least $500 million sit in the green region: each earned more than DASH over the past 5 years with smaller price swings. That is 64% of the 3,633 screened.
- Among those with at least half DASH's swings, FIX has the best return for its risk: 77.0% a year at 46.7% volatility, 14% less than DASH's 54.5%, and a Sharpe ratio (return above cash per unit of volatility) of 1.46 against 0.23 for DASH.
- Among DASH's popular alternatives, AMZN, UBER and YUM are in the region. AMZN earned 9.0% a year against a loss of 2.3% a year for DASH, at 36.6% volatility, 33% less than DASH's 54.5%.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested, and volatility the annualized swing in daily prices, both over 5 years. Labeled dots are the strongest picks from the table below and the names called out above, colored by how close they sit to DASH; faint dots are 93 more of the 2,341 in the green region (the strongest, one per fund family). 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million were screened. Hover over a dot for its figures.
- Popular alternatives
- Same and neighboring categories, and shared themes
- The whole market
- Others in the green region
Is there a better investment than DASH?
Investments that beat DASH over the past 5 years on return, volatility, drawdowns, consistency, crash losses or fees, from its popular alternatives out to the whole market.
- Among DASH's popular alternatives, AMZN, UBER and YUM earned more than DASH with less volatility over the past 5 years. AMZN returned 9.0% a year at 36.6% volatility, against a loss of 2.3% a year at 54.5%.
- Looking beyond its popular alternatives, EBAY (e-commerce) and CAKE (restaurants) earned more than DASH with less volatility over the past 5 years. EBAY returned 11.7% a year at 32.9% volatility, against a loss of 2.3% a year at 54.5%.
- Simply owning the S&P 500 would have done better over the past 5 years: 12.7% a year at 17.1% volatility, against 2.3% at 54.5% for DASH.
How this works
The table below lists investments that beat DASH over the past 5 years on at least one of these measures: a higher annual return with lower volatility, a higher annual return at similar volatility, a similar return with lower volatility, a higher Sharpe ratio with a smaller worst decline, a higher total return in most periods from 3 months to 10 years, or smaller losses in recent market crashes. It checks DASH's popular alternatives first, then the rest of its own and neighboring categories, then every stock and fund worth at least $500 million, and shows the strongest few in each group. The full list of those with a higher return and lower volatility than DASH follows the table.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested. Annual return, volatility and the Sharpe ratio cover 5 years; the worst decline covers the past 10 years. Green marks a better figure than DASH's. "On the frontier" means no other option shown or tested earned more with less volatility. Funds that hold the same thing are shown once. Beyond the popular alternatives, nothing with more than 1.5× DASH's volatility counts as better.
These figures cover the past 5 years. Green marks a better figure than DASH's.
| Investment | Why it is better | Past 5 years | Downside | Long run | Fit | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Annual return?higher is better | Volatility?lower is calmer | Sharpe?return per unit of risk | Worst decline?past 10 years | 5Y returntotal | Corr. with DASH?lower diversifies more | Expenseper year | |||
| −2.3% | 54.5% | 0.23 | −82.5% | −11.1% | 1.00 | — | |||
| +12.7% | 17.1% | 0.79 | −33.7% | +81.7% | 0.61 | 0.09% | |||
| Popular alternativesbest 6 shownThe investments people most often weigh against DASH. 6 of 14 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +9.0% | 36.6% | 0.42 | −56.1% | +53.8% | 0.51 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +8.4% | 44.8% | 0.40 | −68.0% | +49.9% | 0.58 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +5.8% | 21.2% | 0.37 | −52.2% | +32.5% | 0.29 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatility | +2.9% | 17.9% | 0.25 | −36.9% | +15.5% | 0.15 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatility | +3.2% | 49.5% | 0.31 | −69.1% | +17.2% | 0.46 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatility | −0.4% | 31.9% | 0.15 | −43.7% | −1.7% | 0.49 | — | ||
| Same and neighboring categories, and shared themesbest 6 shownEverything else in Online Delivery and the categories next to it (E-Commerce, Restaurants, Passenger Transportation), plus DASH's specific themes. 7 of 12 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +11.7% | 32.9% | 0.50 | −53.6% | +74.2% | 0.48 | — | ||
CAKEThe Cheesecake Factory Incorporated · Restaurants | Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +25.8% | 39.9% | 0.78 | −75.6% | +216% | 0.37 | — | |
EATBrinker International, Inc. · Restaurants | Higher return, lower volatilityHigher return in most periods | +34.6% | 48.8% | 0.86 | −84.9% | +342% | 0.21 | — | |
DRIDarden Restaurants, Inc. · Restaurants | Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +12.4% | 27.2% | 0.57 | −72.8% | +79.7% | 0.36 | — | |
QSRRestaurant Brands International Inc. · Restaurants | Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +8.0% | 23.1% | 0.45 | −63.0% | +46.8% | 0.27 | — | |
TXRHTexas Roadhouse, Inc. · Restaurants | Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +15.9% | 30.4% | 0.64 | −58.0% | +109% | 0.27 | — | |
| The whole marketbest 8 shownEvery other stock and fund worth at least $500 million. 2,644 of 3,607 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| On the frontierHigher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +17.3% | 18.2% | 0.97 | −40.0% | +122% | 0.37 | — | ||
| On the frontierHigher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +42.1% | 24.7% | 1.55 | −46.1% | +479% | 0.20 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +31.5% | 38.5% | 0.91 | −56.6% | +293% | 0.53 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +33.1% | 25.9% | 1.24 | −62.3% | +318% | 0.29 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +33.4% | 36.9% | 0.97 | −45.3% | +323% | 0.52 | 0.35% | ||
| Higher return, similar volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +58.0% | 51.9% | 1.14 | −66.3% | +884% | 0.58 | — | ||
GDXVanEck Gold Miners ETF · Gold Mining | Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +22.9% | 38.2% | 0.73 | −49.8% | +181% | 0.30 | 0.51% | |
| Similar return, lower volatility | −3.2% | 39.4% | 0.12 | −58.7% | −14.8% | 0.55 | — | ||
What these numbers mean for DASH
- Annual return
- DASH lost 2.3% a year over the past 5 years with dividends reinvested, against 12.7% a year for the S&P 500. At that pace, $10,000 became about $8,890. Annual return is the steady yearly rate that would produce the same total result, so investments held over the same span compare fairly. Guide: What is performance and return? →
- Volatility
- DASH's volatility over the past 5 years was 54.5%, 3.2 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, DASH's return lands within 54.5% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump. Guide: Understanding and measuring risk (volatility) →
- Sharpe ratio
- DASH's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.23, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so DASH earned less for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings. Guide: Balancing reward with risk (Sharpe ratio) →
- Worst decline
- DASH's worst fall from a peak to a low over the past 10 years was 82.5%, against 33.7% for the S&P 500. Losses and gains are not symmetric: climbing back from a 82.5% fall takes a 471% gain. Guide: Market crash risk and tail risk →
- Correlation
- Over the past 5 years, DASH's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.61 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They often move together: some diversification next to an index fund, but not a cushion. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against DASH instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a DASH holding. Guide: Correlation and diversification →
Show all 2,341 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that earned more than DASH with less volatility
Out of 3,633 tested over 5 years. The strongest 100 are listed, best first, with funds that hold the same thing listed once.
| # | Investment | Found in | Annual return | Volatility | Sharpe | Worst decline | 5Y return | Corr. with DASH | Expense |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Whole market | +17.3% | 18.2% | 0.97 | −40.0% | +122% | 0.37 | — | |
| 2 | Whole market | +42.1% | 24.7% | 1.55 | −46.1% | +479% | 0.20 | — | |
| 3 | Whole market | +31.5% | 38.5% | 0.91 | −56.6% | +293% | 0.53 | — | |
| 4 | Whole market | +33.1% | 25.9% | 1.24 | −62.3% | +318% | 0.29 | — | |
| 5 | Whole market | +17.4% | 43.4% | 0.59 | −56.9% | +123% | 0.43 | — | |
| 6 | Whole market | +33.2% | 29.4% | 1.13 | −54.9% | +319% | 0.23 | — | |
| 7 | Whole market | +49.0% | 49.0% | 1.06 | −52.2% | +634% | 0.38 | — | |
| 8 | INSWInternational Seaways, Inc. · Oil & Gas | Whole market | +56.5% | 40.5% | 1.31 | −57.4% | +839% | -0.26 | — |
| 9 | Whole market | +31.9% | 43.4% | 0.86 | −48.0% | +299% | 0.29 | — | |
| 10 | Whole market | +33.8% | 32.2% | 1.07 | −37.5% | +329% | 0.43 | — | |
| 11 | Whole market | +57.4% | 48.7% | 1.18 | −57.0% | +866% | 0.27 | — | |
| 12 | Whole market | +25.8% | 47.4% | 0.72 | −55.1% | +215% | 0.36 | — | |
| 13 | Whole market | +26.0% | 23.8% | 1.09 | −63.3% | +217% | 0.42 | — | |
| 14 | Whole market | +31.7% | 33.9% | 0.99 | −73.8% | +295% | 0.38 | — | |
| 15 | Whole market | +38.7% | 33.3% | 1.16 | −69.6% | +413% | 0.31 | — | |
| 16 | Whole market | +44.2% | 36.9% | 1.18 | −71.9% | +524% | 0.08 | — | |
| 17 | Whole market | +35.4% | 35.4% | 1.04 | −55.1% | +355% | 0.40 | — | |
| 18 | Whole market | +33.6% | 30.6% | 1.10 | −45.7% | +326% | 0.26 | — | |
| 19 | Whole market | +32.0% | 40.7% | 0.89 | −55.3% | +301% | 0.37 | — | |
| 20 | Whole market | +33.2% | 32.9% | 1.04 | −64.2% | +319% | 0.08 | — | |
| 21 | Whole market | +33.7% | 29.4% | 1.14 | −47.6% | +327% | 0.18 | — | |
| 22 | Whole market | +48.8% | 43.0% | 1.15 | −52.5% | +631% | 0.34 | — | |
| 23 | Whole market | +22.7% | 24.4% | 0.97 | −50.5% | +179% | 0.46 | — | |
| 24 | Whole market | +19.2% | 21.6% | 0.93 | −47.3% | +141% | 0.44 | — | |
| 25 | Whole market | +29.5% | 38.4% | 0.87 | −54.2% | +264% | 0.27 | — | |
| 26 | Whole market | +24.7% | 31.1% | 0.87 | −74.4% | +201% | 0.27 | — | |
| 27 | Whole market | +22.6% | 24.0% | 0.97 | −57.5% | +177% | 0.38 | — | |
| 28 | Whole market | +20.7% | 44.8% | 0.65 | −38.3% | +156% | 0.25 | — | |
| 29 | Whole market | +18.6% | 39.1% | 0.63 | −62.4% | +135% | 0.22 | — | |
| 30 | Whole market | +33.4% | 36.9% | 0.97 | −45.3% | +323% | 0.52 | 0.35% | |
| 31 | Whole market | +32.9% | 42.2% | 0.89 | −56.9% | +315% | 0.28 | — | |
| 32 | Whole market | +17.4% | 29.1% | 0.70 | −46.4% | +123% | 0.39 | — | |
| 33 | Whole market | +25.6% | 26.2% | 1.00 | −64.1% | +212% | 0.41 | — | |
| 34 | Whole market | +27.5% | 36.9% | 0.85 | −46.7% | +236% | 0.29 | — | |
| 35 | Whole market | +40.4% | 49.9% | 0.93 | −66.3% | +445% | 0.27 | — | |
| 36 | BAPCredicorp Ltd. · Banks | Whole market | +30.8% | 30.3% | 1.04 | −59.2% | +283% | 0.26 | — |
| 37 | Whole market | +25.3% | 34.4% | 0.83 | −64.1% | +209% | 0.38 | — | |
| 38 | NWGNatWest Group plc · Banks | Whole market | +27.7% | 34.1% | 0.89 | −67.4% | +239% | 0.39 | — |
| 39 | Whole market | +14.8% | 31.6% | 0.59 | −54.6% | +99.1% | 0.43 | — | |
| 40 | Whole market | +13.9% | 34.5% | 0.55 | −42.6% | +91.9% | 0.24 | — | |
| 41 | Whole market | +19.9% | 43.2% | 0.63 | −54.3% | +147% | 0.23 | — | |
| 42 | FLEXFlex Ltd. · Electronics Manufacturing | Whole market | +36.0% | 48.2% | 0.88 | −70.0% | +365% | 0.25 | — |
| 43 | Whole market | +20.9% | 35.3% | 0.71 | −58.1% | +159% | 0.22 | — | |
| 44 | SBSCompanhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP · Water Utilities | Whole market | +39.1% | 37.1% | 1.08 | −62.0% | +420% | 0.15 | — |
| 45 | CIBGrupo Cibest S.A. · Banks | Whole market | +32.9% | 32.9% | 1.03 | −70.4% | +314% | 0.29 | — |
| 46 | Whole market | +14.4% | 29.9% | 0.60 | −59.6% | +96.2% | 0.45 | — | |
| 47 | Whole market | +6.9% | 36.7% | 0.36 | −59.9% | +39.5% | 0.41 | — | |
| 48 | SHGShinhan Financial Group Co., Ltd. · Banks | Whole market | +21.0% | 31.1% | 0.77 | −64.1% | +160% | 0.36 | — |
| 49 | NVTnVent Electric plc · Electrical Equipment | Whole market | +35.4% | 38.0% | 0.99 | −56.2% | +356% | 0.25 | — |
| 50 | KGCKinross Gold Corporation · Gold Mining | Whole market | +32.7% | 45.6% | 0.85 | −67.9% | +311% | 0.26 | — |
| 51 | WSMWilliams-Sonoma, Inc. · Specialty Retail | Whole market | +24.5% | 44.4% | 0.71 | −59.7% | +199% | 0.43 | — |
| 52 | THCTenet Healthcare Corporation · Health Care Facilities | Whole market | +32.9% | 45.1% | 0.86 | −71.7% | +315% | 0.31 | — |
| 53 | GDXVanEck Gold Miners ETF · Gold Mining | Whole market | +22.9% | 38.2% | 0.73 | −49.8% | +181% | 0.30 | 0.51% |
| 54 | USFDUS Foods Holding Corp. · Food Distribution | Whole market | +22.7% | 29.8% | 0.84 | −77.3% | +178% | 0.41 | — |
| 55 | COKECoca-Cola Consolidated, Inc. · Food & Beverages | Whole market | +41.2% | 38.0% | 1.10 | −51.7% | +461% | -0.04 | — |
| 56 | UIUbiquiti Inc. · Communications Equipment | Whole market | +14.4% | 49.2% | 0.52 | −72.2% | +95.9% | 0.16 | — |
| 57 | EXPEExpedia Group, Inc. · Travel Services | Whole market | +13.2% | 46.5% | 0.50 | −70.5% | +86.3% | 0.52 | — |
| 58 | FFIVF5, Inc. · Cybersecurity | Whole market | +17.1% | 30.8% | 0.67 | −54.6% | +120% | 0.49 | — |
| 59 | WFWoori Financial Group Inc. · Banks | Whole market | +26.3% | 31.6% | 0.90 | −67.2% | +221% | 0.39 | — |
| 60 | MOG-AMoog Inc. · Aerospace & Defense | Whole market | +36.6% | 32.0% | 1.14 | −63.7% | +375% | 0.16 | — |
| 61 | SNXTD Synnex Corp · Technology Distribution | Whole market | +20.3% | 30.4% | 0.76 | −55.8% | +152% | 0.38 | — |
| 62 | FROFrontline Plc · Oil & Gas | Whole market | +52.6% | 49.7% | 1.10 | −52.0% | +726% | -0.08 | — |
| 63 | NTRSNorthern Trust Corporation · Banks | Whole market | +8.9% | 29.3% | 0.44 | −50.0% | +52.9% | 0.60 | — |
| 64 | EXELExelixis, Inc. · Biotechnology | Whole market | +24.4% | 35.8% | 0.79 | −57.2% | +198% | 0.26 | — |
| 65 | EWYiShares MSCI South Korea ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +16.2% | 34.0% | 0.61 | −49.7% | +112% | 0.37 | 0.59% |
| 66 | HALOHalozyme Therapeutics, Inc. · Biotechnology | Whole market | +26.6% | 40.4% | 0.79 | −49.1% | +226% | 0.22 | — |
| 67 | Whole market | +51.2% | 33.4% | 1.41 | −79.7% | +690% | 0.11 | — | |
| 68 | IDCCInterDigital, Inc. · Intellectual Property Licensing | Whole market | +39.0% | 36.9% | 1.08 | −64.9% | +419% | 0.42 | — |
| 69 | JXNJackson Financial Inc. · Life Insurance | Whole market | +41.7% | 43.3% | 1.03 | −48.4% | +472% | 0.23 | — |
| 70 | PAASPan American Silver Corp. · Metals & Mining | Whole market | +13.6% | 48.9% | 0.51 | −66.7% | +89.0% | 0.18 | — |
| 71 | EWBCEast West Bancorp, Inc. · Regional Banks | Whole market | +11.2% | 35.5% | 0.48 | −67.7% | +70.1% | 0.33 | — |
| 72 | LAURLaureate Education, Inc. · Education Services | Whole market | +37.5% | 32.8% | 1.14 | −64.5% | +391% | 0.01 | — |
| 73 | Whole market | +3.8% | 0.3% | 13.25 | −0.3% | +20.3% | 0.45 | 0.09% | |
| 74 | BPOPPopular, Inc. · Regional Banks | Whole market | +17.7% | 29.7% | 0.70 | −59.0% | +126% | 0.28 | — |
| 75 | VCTRVictory Capital Holdings, Inc. · Asset Management | Whole market | +28.1% | 35.0% | 0.89 | −45.2% | +245% | 0.33 | — |
| 76 | BWLPBW LPG Limited · Marine Shipping | Whole market | +60.3% | 50.9% | 1.19 | −68.8% | +958% | 0.04 | — |
| 77 | LTHLife Time Group Holdings, Inc. · Leisure Facilities | Whole market | +19.0% | 46.6% | 0.61 | −58.4% | +139% | — | — |
| 78 | MATXMatson, Inc. · Freight & Logistics | Whole market | +24.9% | 39.4% | 0.76 | −53.6% | +204% | 0.21 | — |
| 79 | NHCNational HealthCare Corporation · Medical - Care Facilities | Whole market | +32.0% | 28.5% | 1.12 | −35.3% | +301% | 0.11 | — |
| 80 | OROR Royalties Inc. · Gold Mining | Whole market | +24.4% | 36.7% | 0.78 | −61.9% | +198% | 0.33 | — |
| 81 | LGNDLigand Pharmaceuticals Incorporated · Biotechnology | Whole market | +30.2% | 44.2% | 0.82 | −76.9% | +274% | 0.38 | — |
| 82 | FLTWFranklin FTSE Taiwan ETF · Technology | Whole market | +21.8% | 24.3% | 0.94 | −38.0% | +168% | 0.48 | 0.19% |
| 83 | QTUMDefiance Quantum ETF · Technology | Whole market | +22.8% | 28.1% | 0.87 | −38.5% | +179% | 0.53 | 0.40% |
| 84 | IFSIntercorp Financial Services Inc. · Regional Banks | Whole market | +20.8% | 31.1% | 0.77 | −56.9% | +158% | 0.17 | — |
| 85 | DHTDHT Holdings, Inc. · Marine Shipping | Whole market | +38.7% | 39.0% | 1.04 | −39.7% | +413% | -0.08 | — |
| 86 | Same or nearby category | +11.7% | 32.9% | 0.50 | −53.6% | +74.2% | 0.48 | — | |
| 87 | VIRTVirtu Financial, Inc. · Capital Markets | Whole market | +20.8% | 33.8% | 0.73 | −56.2% | +158% | 0.26 | — |
| 88 | CVSACovista Inc. · Education Services | Whole market | +28.9% | 43.3% | 0.81 | −66.1% | +257% | 0.21 | — |
| 89 | MCYMercury General Corporation · Property & Casualty Insurance | Whole market | +17.0% | 34.3% | 0.63 | −55.3% | +119% | 0.40 | — |
| 90 | CGAUCenterra Gold Inc. · Gold Mining | Whole market | +26.3% | 47.6% | 0.73 | −72.2% | +222% | 0.22 | — |
| 91 | OPLNOPENLANE, Inc. · Auto Auctions | Whole market | +19.9% | 39.6% | 0.65 | −64.5% | +148% | 0.31 | — |
| 92 | DXPEDXP Enterprises, Inc. · Industrial - Distribution | Whole market | +39.0% | 46.1% | 0.95 | −77.3% | +419% | 0.28 | — |
| 93 | OUTOutfront Media Inc. · Specialty REITs | Whole market | +11.0% | 38.7% | 0.46 | −73.8% | +68.6% | 0.32 | — |
| 94 | SOXQInvesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF · Technology | Whole market | +28.3% | 38.9% | 0.84 | −46.0% | +248% | 0.48 | 0.19% |
| 95 | SILGlobal X - Silver Miners ETF · Metals & Mining | Whole market | +16.8% | 40.9% | 0.59 | −56.8% | +118% | 0.29 | 0.65% |
| 96 | DCODucommun Incorporated · Aerospace & Defense | Whole market | +27.5% | 34.5% | 0.88 | −70.8% | +236% | 0.28 | — |
| 97 | DGIIDigi International Inc. · Communication Equipment | Whole market | +28.0% | 42.4% | 0.79 | −65.7% | +243% | 0.25 | — |
| 98 | EZPWEZCORP, Inc. · Financial - Credit Services | Whole market | +33.2% | 35.4% | 0.99 | −76.6% | +320% | 0.24 | — |
| 99 | Whole market | +51.8% | 37.5% | 1.31 | −71.7% | +705% | 0.02 | — | |
| 100 | BHEBenchmark Electronics, Inc. · Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Whole market | +24.9% | 37.3% | 0.78 | −60.3% | +204% | 0.03 | — |
DASH against its popular alternatives
The investments people most often weigh against DASH, compared period by period and year by year.
How do DASH's risk and return compare with its alternatives?
This map plots each investment's annual return over the past 5 years against its volatility, the size of its typical price swings. Investments toward the upper left earned more for a smoother ride, and those toward the lower right earned less for a rougher one. The dashed lines cross at DASH, which divides the map into what did better or worse on each measure.
- Six of the 14 popular alternatives, led by AMZN, UBER and YUM, were both more rewarding and calmer than DASH over the past 5 years, earning a higher annual return with lower volatility.
- Over the past 5 years, DASH returned -2.3% a year, less than the S&P 500's 12.7%, with higher volatility (54.5% against 17.1%).
Green points earned more than DASH with less volatility; red points earned less with more. Hover over a point for its figures. Total returns with dividends reinvested, annualized.
All figures
| Investment | Annual return | Volatility |
|---|---|---|
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | +12.7% | 17.1% |
| AMZN Amazon.com, Inc. | +9.0% | 36.6% |
| UBER Uber Technologies, Inc. | +8.4% | 44.8% |
| YUM Yum! Brands, Inc. | +5.8% | 21.2% |
| MELI MercadoLibre, Inc. | +3.2% | 49.5% |
| MCD McDonald's Corporation | +2.9% | 17.9% |
| SBUX Starbucks Corporation | −0.4% | 31.9% |
| DASH This pageDoorDash, Inc. | −2.3% | 54.5% |
| PDD PDD Holdings Inc. | −3.9% | 66.0% |
| DPZ Domino's Pizza, Inc. | −5.8% | 30.2% |
| BABA Alibaba Group Holding Limited | −8.2% | 51.3% |
| TOST Toast, Inc. | −8.5% | 59.9% |
| CPNG Coupang, Inc. | −13.1% | 52.0% |
| JD JD.com, Inc. | −18.6% | 52.6% |
| LYFT Lyft, Inc. | −19.0% | 67.4% |
| SE Sea Limited | −25.9% | 64.6% |
Has DASH consistently beaten its popular alternatives?
This section compares DASH with the investments people most often weigh against it, checking each one over seven periods from one month to five years. Counting how often an alternative earned more than DASH helps separate lasting outperformance from a single strong stretch.
- None of the 15 popular alternatives outperformed DASH in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 2 long-term timeframes. The closest was AMZN.
- AMZN, UBER and YUM earned more for the risk they took than DASH (a higher Sharpe ratio) and fell less in their worst decline of the past 10 years.
A green cell means the alternative earned more than DASH over that period. "Qualified" marks those that did so in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 2 long-term periods.
| Investment | Periods outperformed | Short term | Long term | Risk · 5 years | Fund | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1M | 3M | 6M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | Volatilitylower is calmer | Sharpehigher is better | Worst declinepast 10 years | Expense | Assets | Overlapsame sectors | ||
| DASH DoorDash, Inc. (this page) | — | −1.1% | +1.4% | +1.0% | −12.8% | −27.8% | +162% | −11.1% | 54.5% | 0.23 | −82.5% | — | $83B | — |
| AMZN Specialty RetailAmazon.com, Inc. | 5/5 short1/2 long | +1.6% | +5.1% | +5.8% | +16.0% | +21.3% | +110% | +53.8% | 36.6% | 0.42 | −56.1% | — | $2.8T | — |
| YUM RestaurantsYum! Brands, Inc. | 4/5 short1/2 long | +8.8% | +3.4% | −5.4% | +2.2% | +4.3% | +34.0% | +32.5% | 21.2% | 0.37 | −52.2% | — | $41B | — |
| MELI Specialty RetailMercadoLibre, Inc. | 4/5 short1/2 long | +3.2% | +2.6% | +0.5% | −4.8% | −10.6% | +60.7% | +17.2% | 49.5% | 0.31 | −69.1% | — | $95B | — |
| SBUX RestaurantsStarbucks Corporation | 4/5 short1/2 long | +4.7% | −4.6% | +1.6% | +20.5% | +20.6% | +13.8% | −1.7% | 31.9% | 0.15 | −43.7% | — | $113B | — |
| MCD RestaurantsMcDonald's Corporation | 2/5 short1/2 long | −0.5% | −7.2% | −18.6% | −17.1% | −17.8% | +2.7% | +15.5% | 17.9% | 0.25 | −36.9% | — | $174B | — |
| UBER Software - ApplicationUber Technologies, Inc. | 1/5 short1/2 long | −2.7% | −4.5% | −11.0% | −16.8% | −26.4% | +60.5% | +49.9% | 44.8% | 0.40 | −68.0% | — | $141B | — |
| TOST Software - InfrastructureToast, Inc. | 5/5 short0/2 long | +9.6% | +5.8% | +11.9% | −4.0% | −13.3% | +85.7% | −35.9% | 59.9% | 0.15 | −80.6% | — | $17B | — |
| CART Software - ServicesMaplebear Inc. | 5/5 short0/2 long | +11.4% | +8.6% | +15.3% | +15.6% | +30.3% | +104% | — | — | — | −38.0% | — | $12B | — |
| LYFT Software - ApplicationLyft, Inc. | 4/5 short0/2 long | +13.0% | +11.8% | +19.6% | −12.8% | −14.6% | +70.8% | −65.1% | 67.4% | 0.03 | −89.8% | — | $6.5B | — |
| DPZ RestaurantsDomino's Pizza, Inc. | 2/5 short0/2 long | +6.9% | −3.3% | −13.3% | −24.3% | −23.6% | −4.4% | −25.7% | 30.2% | -0.05 | −47.8% | — | $10B | — |
| JD Specialty RetailJD.com, Inc. | 2/5 short0/2 long | −1.9% | −12.5% | −14.7% | −6.2% | −18.0% | +20.2% | −64.3% | 52.6% | -0.14 | −79.1% | — | $36B | — |
| PDD Specialty RetailPDD Holdings Inc. | 1/5 short0/2 long | +2.9% | −5.1% | −21.7% | −29.5% | −38.0% | −20.6% | −17.9% | 66.0% | 0.26 | −87.4% | — | $116B | — |
| BABA Specialty RetailAlibaba Group Holding Limited | 0/5 short0/2 long | −6.1% | −9.7% | −21.7% | −29.6% | −36.8% | +44.5% | −34.8% | 51.3% | 0.08 | −80.1% | — | $270B | — |
| CPNG Specialty RetailCoupang, Inc. | 0/5 short0/2 long | −2.1% | −12.9% | −33.4% | −38.7% | −54.8% | −18.9% | −50.3% | 52.0% | -0.01 | −81.5% | — | $26B | — |
| SE Specialty RetailSea Limited | 0/5 short0/2 long | −21.6% | −23.9% | −10.0% | −38.8% | −51.5% | +80.3% | −77.7% | 64.6% | -0.14 | −90.5% | — | $49B | — |
How did DASH do year by year?
This table shows each investment's total return in every full calendar year since 2021, along with where DASH ranked among its popular alternatives each year. Annual results reveal how consistently each one kept pace with DASH and how far its good and bad years diverged, detail that multiyear averages tend to smooth over.
Note: DASH began trading on December 9, 2020, so the table starts with 2021, its first full calendar year, and cannot show how it fared during the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or six other sell-offs.
- DASH finished ahead of the S&P 500 in three of its five full calendar years, and ahead of it in each of the last three.
- Ranked against its popular alternatives each year, DASH finished in the top quarter in three of five years and in the bottom quarter in one. In 2025, it ranked 4 of 16.
- None of the 12 popular alternatives came out ahead of DASH in most of the years they have in common.
Newest year first. Green marks a year in which the fund came out ahead of DASH; gray means the two finished within a fraction of a point. The rank row places DASH among the alternatives that traded the full year; dark green is the top quarter and red the bottom quarter.
| Investment | Years ahead of DASH | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DASH This pageDoorDash, Inc. | — | +35.0% | +69.6% | +103% | −67.2% | +4.3% |
| Rank among alternatives | Top quarter in 3 of 5 | 4 of 16 | 4 of 16 | 2 of 15 | 13 of 15 | 6 of 13 |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 2 of 5 | +17.7% | +24.9% | +26.2% | −18.2% | +28.7% |
| AMZN Amazon.com, Inc. | 1 of 5 | +5.2% | +44.4% | +80.9% | −49.6% | +2.4% |
| YUM Yum! Brands, Inc. | 2 of 5 | +14.9% | +4.7% | +3.9% | −6.0% | +30.1% |
| MELI MercadoLibre, Inc. | 1 of 5 | +18.4% | +8.2% | +85.7% | −37.2% | −19.5% |
| SBUX Starbucks Corporation | 2 of 5 | −5.3% | −2.5% | −1.2% | −13.2% | +11.1% |
| MCD McDonald's Corporation | 2 of 5 | +7.9% | +0.1% | +15.1% | +0.5% | +27.8% |
| UBER Uber Technologies, Inc. | 2 of 5 | +35.5% | −2.0% | +149% | −41.0% | −17.8% |
| TOST Toast, Inc. | 2 of 4 | −2.6% | +99.6% | +1.3% | −48.0% | — |
| CART Maplebear Inc. | 1 of 2 | +8.6% | +76.5% | — | — | — |
| LYFT Lyft, Inc. | 1 of 5 | +50.2% | −13.9% | +36.0% | −74.2% | −13.0% |
| DPZ Domino's Pizza, Inc. | 2 of 5 | +0.9% | +3.2% | +20.7% | −37.9% | +48.4% |
| JD JD.com, Inc. | 1 of 5 | −14.9% | +23.5% | −47.8% | −17.9% | −20.3% |
| PDD PDD Holdings Inc. | 1 of 5 | +16.9% | −33.7% | +79.4% | +39.9% | −67.2% |
| BABA Alibaba Group Holding Limited | 2 of 5 | +75.8% | +11.8% | −10.8% | −25.9% | −49.0% |
| CPNG Coupang, Inc. | 1 of 4 | +7.3% | +35.8% | +10.1% | −49.9% | — |
| SE Sea Limited | 2 of 5 | +20.2% | +162% | −22.2% | −76.7% | +12.4% |
Risk and diversification
How DASH has fallen, how it held up in crashes beside the S&P 500 and its popular alternatives, and what moves independently of it.
What were DASH's worst declines?
A drawdown is the decline from a peak to the lowest point before a new high. This section presents DASH's five deepest drawdowns since it began trading in 2020, alongside the S&P 500's return over the same dates, and how long each took to recover. Together, these figures show how much an investor could have lost and how long it took to get back to even.
Note: DASH began trading on December 9, 2020, so this list cannot include the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or six other sell-offs. The crash tests on this page show how older funds and the S&P 500 fared through those years.
- In all five of DASH's worst declines, the S&P 500 held up better over the same dates.
- Not every decline was the market's doing: DASH fell 47.5% from February to May 2021, while the S&P 500 rose 4.3%.
- The slowest recovery came after DASH fell 82.5% from November 2021 to October 2022; it did not regain that peak until June 2025, three years later.
Green means DASH fell less than the S&P 500 over the same dates. Based on daily closing prices with dividends reinvested.
| During | DASH fell | S&P 500, same dates | Peak | Low | Time to the low | Back at the peak | Time to recover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 bear market | −82.5% | −22.3% | Nov 2021 | Oct 2022 | 11 months | Jun 2025 | 2.7 years |
| No named crash | −48.0% | −5.1% | Oct 2025 | Mar 2026 | 5 months | Not yet | — |
| No named crash | −47.5% | +4.3% | Feb 2021 | May 2021 | 3 months | Sep 2021 | 4 months |
| No named crash | −26.6% | +1.0% | Dec 2020 | Jan 2021 | 1 month | Jan 2021 | Under a month |
| No named crash | −14.4% | +3.2% | Jan 2021 | Feb 2021 | 1 month | Feb 2021 | Under a month |
How did DASH do in stock market crashes?
This section measures how far DASH, the S&P 500 and each alternative fell from peak to trough during every major market crash since 2000. A smaller decline means an investment held up better, and comparing results across crashes shows whether that resilience was consistent or a one-off.
Note: DASH began trading on December 9, 2020, so its row reads "Not yet trading" for the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or six other sell-offs. The older alternatives and the S&P 500 show how those crashes played out.
- DASH fell further than the S&P 500 in all two crashes it has traded through. The clearest case was the 2022 bear market, when DASH fell 68.8% and the S&P 500 fell 24.5%.
- Among its popular alternatives, AMZN held up best, falling less than DASH in all two crashes they both traded through.
- DASH began trading after the 2008 financial crisis, but six of its popular alternatives lived through it. The mildest fall among them was MCD's 21.4%, against 55.2% for the S&P 500.
Newest crash first. Each figure is the fund's deepest fall within the crash window; green means a smaller fall than DASH.
| Investment | Held up better | 2023 regional bank crisisMar 2023 | 2022 bear marketJan 2022 | Covid crashFeb 2020 | Late-2018 sell-offSep 2018 | February 2018 volatility shockFeb 2018 | 2015 China and oil sell-offAug 2015 | 2011 euro debt crisisJul 2011 | 2010 flash crashMay 2010 | 2008 financial crisisOct 2007 | Dot-com bustMar 2000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DASH This pageDoorDash, Inc. | — | −8.5% | −68.8% | Not yet trading | Not yet trading | Not yet trading | Not yet trading | Not yet trading | Not yet trading | Not yet trading | Not yet trading |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 2 of 2 | −3.4% | −24.5% | −33.7% | −19.3% | −6.5% | −12.8% | −17.9% | −1.5% | −55.2% | −47.5% |
| AMZN Amazon.com, Inc. | 2 of 2 | −3.4% | −39.6% | −22.7% | −33.2% | −7.1% | −30.6% | −20.7% | −2.9% | −65.3% | −91.8% |
| YUM Yum! Brands, Inc. | 2 of 2 | −1.7% | −22.2% | −46.3% | −6.9% | −7.7% | −24.7% | −12.3% | −1.1% | −45.5% | −33.0% |
| MELI MercadoLibre, Inc. | 2 of 2 | −7.2% | −51.6% | −39.1% | −30.3% | −8.8% | −31.9% | −39.5% | 0.0% | −89.5% | — |
| SBUX Starbucks Corporation | 2 of 2 | −3.3% | −38.4% | −37.5% | −11.4% | −3.0% | −14.2% | −15.5% | −0.6% | −73.2% | −44.1% |
| MCD McDonald's Corporation | 2 of 2 | −1.4% | −17.2% | −36.1% | −9.7% | −6.1% | −9.8% | −7.3% | −2.0% | −21.4% | −57.1% |
| UBER Uber Technologies, Inc. | 1 of 2 | −9.4% | −53.9% | −63.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| TOST Toast, Inc. | 1 of 2 | −9.5% | −58.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| LYFT Lyft, Inc. | 0 of 2 | −13.7% | −74.9% | −65.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| DPZ Domino's Pizza, Inc. | 2 of 2 | −3.8% | −43.1% | −23.1% | −20.3% | −7.4% | −11.5% | −14.8% | −5.9% | −83.3% | — |
| JD JD.com, Inc. | 1 of 2 | −14.6% | −45.1% | −21.0% | −27.3% | −8.2% | −29.9% | — | — | — | — |
| PDD PDD Holdings Inc. | 2 of 2 | −7.9% | −61.4% | −15.7% | −38.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| BABA Alibaba Group Holding Limited | 2 of 2 | −4.7% | −45.1% | −20.6% | −20.7% | −7.3% | −29.1% | — | — | — | — |
| CPNG Coupang, Inc. | 2 of 2 | −7.3% | −64.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| SE Sea Limited | 1 of 2 | −8.0% | −73.3% | −27.7% | −26.4% | −8.8% | — | — | — | — | — |
How closely does DASH move with the S&P 500?
Upside capture measures how much of the S&P 500's gains an investment kept in the months the market rose, and downside capture how much of its losses it took in the months the market fell. An investment that captures more of the gains than the losses has compounded ahead of the market over time. This section compares DASH with its popular alternatives on both measures, and on beta (how strongly each has moved with the market), over the past 5 years.
- AMZN took just 170% of the S&P 500's losses, against 261% for DASH, while still keeping 125% of its gains.
- Over the past 5 years, DASH captured 143% of the S&P 500's gains in rising months and 261% of its losses in falling months, with a beta of 1.89. It amplified the market's moves in both directions.
- Five of the 14 popular alternatives had a higher capture ratio (upside capture divided by downside capture) than DASH's 0.55, led by UBER, YUM and AMZN.
Monthly total returns over the past 5 years, measured against SPY. 100% capture or a beta of 1.00 means moving in line with the S&P 500. Green marks a better figure than DASH's: more upside, less downside or a higher capture ratio. Sorted by capture ratio.
| Investment | Upside capture | Downside capture | Capture ratio | Beta |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DASH This pageDoorDash, Inc. | 143% | 261% | 0.55 | 1.89 |
| UBER Uber Technologies, Inc. | 99% | 124% | 0.80 | 1.26 |
| YUM Yum! Brands, Inc. | 45% | 58% | 0.79 | 0.55 |
| AMZN Amazon.com, Inc. | 125% | 170% | 0.74 | 1.45 |
| MCD McDonald's Corporation | 40% | 63% | 0.63 | 0.44 |
| MELI MercadoLibre, Inc. | 84% | 146% | 0.57 | 1.31 |
| SBUX Starbucks Corporation | 77% | 142% | 0.54 | 0.98 |
| BABA Alibaba Group Holding Limited | 76% | 167% | 0.45 | 0.48 |
| TOST Toast, Inc. | 116% | 267% | 0.44 | 1.74 |
| DPZ Domino's Pizza, Inc. | 62% | 159% | 0.39 | 0.95 |
| SE Sea Limited | 81% | 283% | 0.29 | 1.54 |
| LYFT Lyft, Inc. | 81% | 292% | 0.28 | 1.95 |
| CPNG Coupang, Inc. | 27% | 135% | 0.20 | 1.16 |
| JD JD.com, Inc. | 8% | 122% | 0.07 | 0.33 |
| PDD PDD Holdings Inc. | -1% | 17% | -0.05 | -0.04 |
What diversifies DASH?
Correlation measures how closely two investments move together, on a scale from 1 (in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to -1 (in opposite directions). This section lists large ETFs and stocks whose returns have had a low correlation with DASH's. Because such investments tend not to fall at the same time, pairing DASH with them can reduce a portfolio's overall swings.
- Moving a fifth of the money in DASH into MCK would have cut the portfolio's volatility by 19% over the past 5 years and raised its annual return (-2.3% for DASH alone, +6.8% for the mix).
- Among large ETFs, LVHI, DXJ and EMLP have moved largely independently of DASH over the past 5 years, with correlations of 0.35 or lower, and each still earned a positive 5-year return.
- In 2022, the one year DASH lost money (-67.2%), MCK returned +51.8%.
Only ETFs with at least $1.0B in assets and stocks worth at least $10B, with a correlation below 0.5 over the past 5 years and a positive return, are included, ranked by Sharpe ratio; funds that hold the same thing are shown once. The year columns are the years in which DASH lost money. The last two columns show a portfolio that is 80% DASH and 20% the other investment, rebalanced monthly.
ETFs
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2022 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DASH DoorDash, Inc. (this page) | 1.00 | −11.1% | 0.23 | −67.2% | 48.2% | −2.3% |
| LVHI InternationalFranklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 0.30 | +119% | 1.48 | +3.8% | 39.1% | +3.1% |
| DXJ InternationalWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund | 0.30 | +225% | 1.34 | +6.0% | 39.4% | +4.8% |
| EMLP Broad MarketFirst Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund | 0.35 | +101% | 1.04 | +10.4% | 39.7% | +2.8% |
| HDV Dividend & IncomeiShares Core High Dividend ETF | 0.28 | +83.3% | 1.00 | +7.1% | 39.4% | +2.2% |
| EWP Broad MarketiShares MSCI Spain ETF | 0.44 | +140% | 0.97 | −5.2% | 40.3% | +3.6% |
| GLD CommoditiesSPDR Gold Shares | 0.23 | +126% | 0.96 | −0.8% | 39.5% | +3.4% |
| SPMO Broad MarketInvesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 0.45 | +136% | 0.93 | −10.4% | 40.6% | +3.6% |
| XLE EnergyState Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | 0.01 | +177% | 0.93 | +64.4% | 38.9% | +4.8% |
Stocks
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2022 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DASH DoorDash, Inc. (this page) | 1.00 | −11.1% | 0.23 | −67.2% | 48.2% | −2.3% |
| CAH Medical - DistributionCardinal Health, Inc. | 0.20 | +479% | 1.55 | +54.1% | 39.9% | +6.9% |
| CLS Hardware, Equipment & PartsCelestica Inc. | 0.28 | +3,143% | 1.47 | +1.3% | 43.3% | +17.9% |
| FIX Engineering & ConstructionComfort Systems USA, Inc. | 0.23 | +1,636% | 1.46 | +17.0% | 41.5% | +14.6% |
| MCK Medical - DistributionMcKesson Corporation | -0.02 | +413% | 1.44 | +51.8% | 38.8% | +6.8% |
| MPC Oil & Gas Refining & MarketingMarathon Petroleum Corporation | 0.11 | +690% | 1.41 | +86.6% | 39.8% | +9.0% |
Common questions
What was DASH's worst drawdown?
DASH's deepest decline since it began trading in 2020 was 82.5%, from November 2021 to October 2022. It took about three years from the low to climb back to its old high. Because DASH launched in December 2020, that record does not include the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or six other sell-offs.
What were DASH's best and worst years?
Over five full calendar years, DASH's best year was 2023, when it returned 103%. Its worst was 2022, with a return of -67.2%.
Is there a better investment than DASH?
Among DASH's popular alternatives, AMZN, UBER and YUM earned more than DASH with less volatility over the past 5 years. AMZN returned 9.0% a year at 36.6% volatility, against a loss of 2.3% a year at 54.5%. Looking beyond its popular alternatives, EBAY (e-commerce) and CAKE (restaurants) earned more than DASH with less volatility over the past 5 years. EBAY returned 11.7% a year at 32.9% volatility, against a loss of 2.3% a year at 54.5%.
Is DASH more volatile than the S&P 500?
Yes. DASH's volatility over the past 5 years was 54.5%, 3.2 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, DASH's return lands within 54.5% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump.
What is DASH's Sharpe ratio?
DASH's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.23, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so DASH earned less for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings.
How correlated is DASH with the S&P 500?
Over the past 5 years, DASH's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.61 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They often move together: some diversification next to an index fund, but not a cushion. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against DASH instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a DASH holding.
What are the best alternatives to DASH?
None of the 15 popular alternatives we compared outperformed DASH in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 2 long-term timeframes, which says more about DASH's strength than about its alternatives.
Did DASH outperform the S&P 500?
DASH finished ahead of the S&P 500 (SPY) in three of five full calendar years. In 2025, it returned +35.0%, against +17.7% for the index.
How did DASH do in stock market crashes?
DASH fell less than the S&P 500 (SPY) in none of the two major crashes it has traded through, and further in two. The clearest case was the 2022 bear market, when DASH fell 68.8% and the S&P 500 fell 24.5%.
What diversifies DASH?
These had a low correlation with DASH over the past 5 years and still earned a positive 5-year return: among large ETFs, LVHI (correlation 0.30), DXJ (correlation 0.30) and EMLP (correlation 0.35); among large stocks, CAH (correlation 0.20), CLS (correlation 0.28) and FIX (correlation 0.23). A correlation near zero means the two have moved largely independently.
How we measure
- Short-term periods are 1M, 3M, 6M, YTD, 1Y; long-term periods are 3Y, 5Y. An investment outperformed in a period when its total return, with dividends reinvested, was higher than DASH's. Returns within 0.5 points or 3% of DASH's, whichever is larger, count as a tie.
- "Qualified" means outperforming in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 2 long-term periods. "All-weather" means outperforming in every long-term period and all but one short-term period.
- Popular alternatives are the funds and stocks most often compared with this one. We include only those that trade today, are not leveraged or inverse, and hold at least $200 million.
- Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily returns over 5 years, a measure of how much the price typically swings in a year. The Sharpe ratio is the return above cash for each unit of that volatility.
- A decline, or drawdown, runs from a peak to the lowest close before the next high. The worst decline ever uses all the price history we have; comparisons between funds use the past 10 years so that younger funds are judged on the same stretch.
- Sector overlap is the share of assets two funds hold in the same sectors. Correlation and the mixed-portfolio figures use monthly returns.
- Upside and downside capture follow Morningstar's definition: the compound monthly return in the months the S&P 500 rose (or fell), divided by the S&P 500's compound return in those months. Beta measures how strongly monthly returns have moved with the S&P 500. All three use the same window for every investment.
- Figures are computed from daily adjusted prices and update after each trading day. Past performance does not predict future results.
More research
Popular alternatives to DASH
AMZNAmazon.com
YUMYum! Brands
MELIMercadoLibre
SBUXStarbucks
MCDMcDonald's
UBERUber Technologies
PDDPDD
BABAAlibaba Group Holding
SESea