Relative Intelligence · Construction Materials

How CRH compares with the whole market and its popular alternatives
Built by QuantCommons' quantitative engine, this page is about relative opportunity, not data on CRH alone. It places CRH (CRH plc) against 19 popular alternatives, its neighboring categories and the entire market of over 10,000 U.S.-listed stocks and ETFs, and surfaces what has done better on consistent outperformance, return for the risk taken, behavior in real market crashes and diversification. The result is a clearer view of where CRH stands in the market, and of the alternatives worth a closer look.
Period covered: CRH's full trading record, from July 1989 through September 2026. All returns include reinvested dividends. Data as of October 20, 2026.
Data as of October 20, 2026. Full tables and charts read best on a larger screen.
On this page12 sections
Key findings
- Right nowCRH has gone against the market, falling 27.6% over the past 6 months while the S&P 500 rose 9.1%. The slide is CRH's own: it is 34.4% below its high, against 1.3% for the S&P 500. At a glance ↓
- Stock or market?The weakness is CRH's own: it fell 14.4% over the past 3 months while the construction materials ETF XLB (State Street Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF) rose 2.9%. The S&P 500 rose 3.9%. Its construction materials peers did not move as one over the past 3 months: JHX (James Hardie Industries) rose 5.9%, while KNF (Knife River) fell 34.9%.
- Past 1 to 3 yearsOver the past year, CRH fell 26.4% while the S&P 500 rose 15.8%. The same gap shows up over 3 years (64.2% against 89.3%). That said, CRH finished ahead of the S&P 500 in both 2024 and 2025. By year ↓
- Long termCRH turned $10,000 into $33,600 over the past decade, against $42,100 in the S&P 500. On the flip side, the past 5 years have been the better stretch: CRH rose 103% against 81.7% for the S&P 500, after trailing over the decade. Growth of $10,000 ↓
- In a crashAcross seven sell-offs, CRH has typically fallen 1.4 times as far as the S&P 500. The Covid crash took 49.8% off CRH, against 33.7% for the S&P 500. That was more than VMC (Vulcan Materials, 43.4%) but less than JHX (James Hardie Industries, 54.3%). Crash tests ↓
- DiversificationAgainst the S&P 500, CRH has a correlation of 0.67 over 5 years, more closely than 97% of stocks worth at least $300 million. Next to an index fund it is more of the same, not a cushion. Market capture ↓
- Better options
- Popular alternatives
- CAT (Caterpillar) earned more for the risk it took than CRH over the past 5 years, and its worst fall in 10 years was 43.4%, against 53.3% for CRH.
- Nearby categories and themes
- TT (Trane Technologies, building products) and CMI (Cummins, industrial machinery) earned more than CRH with less volatility over the past 5 years. TT returned 22.7% a year at 27.7% volatility, against 15.2% a year at 31.4%.
- Whole market
- 154 of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than CRH with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them AAPL (Apple), WMT (Walmart) and JPM (JPMorgan Chase & Co.).
How much would $10,000 in CRH have grown?
This chart tracks a hypothetical $10,000 investment in CRH over the past 29 years, with dividends reinvested, alongside the same amount in the S&P 500, investments that ended ahead of CRH over the same span and CRH's popular alternatives, among those that traded for the entire period. A second view covers the past 5 years, the period the better options further down the page are judged on. It shows not only where each investment ended up but also how smooth or uneven the path was.
- $10,000 invested in CRH at the end of September 1997 would have grown to $159,236 by September 2026, more than the $132,907 it would have become in SPY, an S&P 500 fund.
- Six of the eight other investments on the chart ended ahead of CRH, and USLM finished highest, at $876,790.
Choose a period
From the end of September 1997 to the end of September 2026. The scale is logarithmic, so equal steps up the chart are equal percentage gains. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 367 of the 1,042 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of CRH; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- USLM$876,790+8,668% total · +16.7% a year
- CAT$615,591+6,056% total · +15.3% a year
- NUE$361,333+3,513% total · +13.2% a year
- VMI$296,253+2,863% total · +12.4% a year
- SSD$216,751+2,068% total · +11.2% a year
- MLM$189,502+1,795% total · +10.7% a year
- CRH$159,236+1,492% total · +10.0% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$132,907+1,229% total · +9.3% a year
- CXT$89,031+790% total · +7.8% a year
- LPX$38,467+285% total · +4.8% a year
From the end of September 2021 to the end of September 2026. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 759 of the 3,628 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of CRH; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- PWR$56,870+469% total · +41.6% a year
- USLM$47,723+377% total · +36.7% a year
- CAT$46,130+361% total · +35.8% a year
- URI$29,622+196% total · +24.3% a year
- NUE$25,527+155% total · +20.6% a year
- VMI$20,517+105% total · +15.5% a year
- CRH$20,309+103% total · +15.2% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$19,000+90.0% total · +13.7% a year
- BCC$17,659+76.6% total · +12.0% a year
- SSD$16,611+66.1% total · +10.7% a year
CRH at a glance
This section summarizes the key facts about the stock, its returns over periods from one to ten years and the risk it has carried, with dividends reinvested throughout. These figures serve as the baseline for every comparison that follows.
- CRH is still 34.4% below its all-time high.
- CRH's deepest decline since it began trading in 1989 was 65.6%, from July 2007 to August 2010. It took about six years from the low to climb back to its old high.
- Over 29 full calendar years, CRH's best was 2023, when it returned 81.3%, and its worst was 2002, when it lost 27.7%. It lost money in ten of those years.
The company
- Market value
- $57B
- Industry
- Construction Materials
- Price history from
- July 1989
Returns
- Past 1 year
- −26.4%total return
- Past 3 years
- +64.2%+18.0% a year
- Past 5 years
- +103%+15.2% a year
- Past 10 years
- +236%+12.9% a year
- Best calendar year
- +81.3%2023
- Worst calendar year
- −27.7%2002
- Losing years
- 10 of 29full calendar years
Risk
- Volatility
- 31.4%typical yearly swing, 5 years
- Sharpe ratio
- 0.61return per unit of risk, 5 years
- Worst decline ever
- −65.6%Jul 2007 to Aug 2010
- From its all-time high
- −34.4%below the peak
CRH against the whole market
Where CRH ranks among every stock and fund, and what across the market has done better.
How does CRH rank among all stocks?
This section ranks CRH on return, volatility, risk-adjusted return and worst decline against every stock worth at least $300 million with enough history. Where the comparisons with its popular alternatives show how CRH stacks up against its peers, these rankings show where it stands in the market as a whole.
- On return for the risk taken (the Sharpe ratio), CRH ranks in the top 22% of the 2,893 stocks worth at least $300 million.
- CRH's 1-year return ranks in the bottom 16% of the 3,287 stocks worth at least $300 million with 1 year of history.
Ranked against U.S.-listed stocks worth at least $300M that have enough history for each measure, so the count changes from row to row; smaller stocks are left out. Lower volatility and smaller declines rank higher.
| Measure | CRH | Rank | Standing |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | −26.4% | 2,778 of 3,287 | bottom 16% |
| 3-year return | +64.2% | 1,341 of 3,017 | top 44% |
| 5-year return | +103% | 668 of 2,893 | top 23% |
| 10-year return | +236% | 757 of 2,202 | top 34% |
| Volatility, 5 years | 31.4% | 854 of 2,893 | top 30% |
| Sharpe ratio, 5 years | 0.61 | 647 of 2,893 | top 22% |
| Worst decline, past 10 years | −53.3% | 584 of 2,187 | top 27% |
What has beaten CRH on both return and risk?
Each dot is an investment, placed by how much it earned a year over the past 5 years (higher is better) and how much its price swung, its volatility (further left is calmer). CRH sits where the dashed lines cross. Anything in the green box above and to the left earned more than CRH with smaller swings, a better trade-off over this period on both counts. Past results are no promise, but a name in the box is worth a closer look.
- 104 stocks and 50 ETFs worth at least $500 million sit in the green region: each earned more than CRH over the past 5 years with smaller price swings. That is 4% of the 3,633 screened.
- Among those with at least half CRH's swings, CAH has the best return for its risk: 42.1% a year at 24.7% volatility, 21% less than CRH's 31.4%, and a Sharpe ratio (return above cash per unit of volatility) of 1.55 against 0.61 for CRH.
- None of CRH's popular alternatives made it, but WAB (industrial machinery) did: 25.6% a year at 26.2% volatility, 16% less than CRH's 31.4%.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested, and volatility the annualized swing in daily prices, both over 5 years. Labeled dots are the strongest picks from the table below and the names called out above, colored by how close they sit to CRH; faint dots are 90 more of the 154 in the green region (the strongest, one per fund family). 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million were screened. Hover over a dot for its figures.
- Popular alternatives
- Same and neighboring categories, and shared themes
- The whole market
- Others in the green region
Is there a better investment than CRH?
Investments that beat CRH over the past 5 years on return, volatility, drawdowns, consistency, crash losses or fees, from its popular alternatives out to the whole market.
- Among CRH's popular alternatives, CAT earned more for the risk it took than CRH over the past 5 years, and its worst fall in 10 years was 43.4%, against 53.3% for CRH.
- Looking beyond its popular alternatives, TT (building products) and CMI (industrial machinery) earned more than CRH with less volatility over the past 5 years. TT returned 22.7% a year at 27.7% volatility, against 15.2% a year at 31.4%.
- Across the whole market, 154 of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than CRH with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them AAPL, WMT and JPM.
How this works
The table below lists investments that beat CRH over the past 5 years on at least one of these measures: a higher annual return with lower volatility, a higher annual return at similar volatility, a similar return with lower volatility, a higher Sharpe ratio with a smaller worst decline, a higher total return in most periods from 3 months to 10 years, or smaller losses in recent market crashes. It checks CRH's popular alternatives first, then the rest of its own and neighboring categories, then every stock and fund worth at least $500 million, and shows the strongest few in each group. The full list of those with a higher return and lower volatility than CRH follows the table.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested. Annual return, volatility and the Sharpe ratio cover 5 years; the worst decline covers the past 10 years. Green marks a better figure than CRH's. "On the frontier" means no other option shown or tested earned more with less volatility. Funds that hold the same thing are shown once. Beyond the popular alternatives, nothing with more than 1.5× CRH's volatility counts as better.
These figures cover the past 5 years. Green marks a better figure than CRH's.
| Investment | Why it is better | Past 5 years | Downside | Long run | Fit | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Annual return?higher is better | Volatility?lower is calmer | Sharpe?return per unit of risk | Worst decline?past 10 years | 10Y returntotal | Corr. with CRH?lower diversifies more | Expenseper year | |||
| +15.2% | 31.4% | 0.61 | −53.3% | +236% | 1.00 | — | |||
| +12.7% | 17.1% | 0.79 | −33.7% | +321% | 0.67 | 0.09% | |||
| Popular alternativesbest 6 shownThe investments people most often weigh against CRH. 6 of 18 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return, similar volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +31.1% | 31.9% | 1.01 | −43.4% | +936% | 0.50 | — | ||
USLMUnited States Lime & Minerals, Inc. · Construction Materials | Higher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +35.6% | 36.1% | 1.03 | −45.9% | +803% | 0.32 | — | |
| Higher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +39.3% | 37.2% | 1.08 | −45.5% | +2,045% | 0.37 | — | ||
| Higher return in most periods | +24.3% | 39.1% | 0.75 | −63.3% | +1,270% | 0.63 | — | ||
| Higher return in most periods | +21.7% | 37.4% | 0.72 | −57.2% | +569% | 0.49 | — | ||
VMIValmont Industries, Inc. · Infrastructure | Higher return in most periods | +13.8% | 32.7% | 0.56 | −48.9% | +288% | 0.52 | — | |
| Same and neighboring categories, and shared themesbest 6 shownEverything else in Construction Materials and the categories next to it (Building Products, Engineering & Construction, Industrial Machinery, Equipment Rental), plus CRH's specific themes. 28 of 78 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +22.7% | 27.7% | 0.88 | −40.5% | +955% | 0.58 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +19.9% | 29.0% | 0.77 | −44.0% | +444% | 0.65 | — | ||
FSSFederal Signal Corporation · Industrial Machinery | Higher return, similar volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +23.3% | 31.7% | 0.82 | −33.0% | +882% | 0.58 | — | |
ACAArcosa, Inc. · Construction Materials | Higher return, similar volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +23.1% | 34.0% | 0.78 | −36.8% | — | 0.49 | — | |
PAVEGlobal X - U.S. Infrastructure Development ETF · Infrastructure Equity · Infrastructure Construction theme | Similar return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +14.9% | 21.6% | 0.75 | −44.1% | — | 0.72 | 0.47% | |
GGGGraco Inc. · Industrial Machinery | Smaller losses in recent crashes | +3.5% | 22.9% | 0.26 | −30.6% | +263% | 0.54 | — | |
| The whole marketbest 8 shownEvery other stock and fund worth at least $500 million. 710 of 3,537 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +17.4% | 22.9% | 0.82 | −31.4% | +685% | 0.43 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +21.3% | 25.6% | 0.89 | −30.3% | +816% | 0.31 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +22.4% | 22.3% | 1.02 | −46.3% | +347% | 0.32 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +19.2% | 22.4% | 0.90 | −42.0% | +311% | 0.41 | — | ||
| Higher return, similar volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +40.7% | 32.8% | 1.21 | −34.5% | +1,807% | 0.12 | — | ||
IXNiShares Global Tech ETF · Technology Equity | Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +19.2% | 26.2% | 0.81 | −36.3% | +720% | 0.49 | 0.37% | |
RSPTInvesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF · Technology Equity | Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +16.9% | 25.1% | 0.75 | −33.7% | +572% | 0.55 | 0.40% | |
| Similar return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +15.8% | 20.0% | 0.84 | −42.0% | +310% | 0.48 | — | ||
What these numbers mean for CRH
- Annual return
- CRH returned 15.2% a year over the past 5 years with dividends reinvested, against 12.7% a year for the S&P 500. At that pace, $10,000 became about $20,300. Annual return is the steady yearly rate that would produce the same total result, so investments held over the same span compare fairly. Guide: What is performance and return? →
- Volatility
- CRH's volatility over the past 5 years was 31.4%, 1.8 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, CRH's return lands within 31.4% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump. Guide: Understanding and measuring risk (volatility) →
- Sharpe ratio
- CRH's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.61, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so CRH earned less for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings. Guide: Balancing reward with risk (Sharpe ratio) →
- Worst decline
- CRH's worst fall from a peak to a low over the past 10 years was 53.3%, against 33.7% for the S&P 500. Losses and gains are not symmetric: climbing back from a 53.3% fall takes a 114% gain. Guide: Market crash risk and tail risk →
- Correlation
- Over the past 5 years, CRH's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.67 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They often move together: some diversification next to an index fund, but not a cushion. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against CRH instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a CRH holding. Guide: Correlation and diversification →
Show all 154 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that earned more than CRH with less volatility
Out of 3,633 tested over 5 years. The strongest 100 are listed, best first, with funds that hold the same thing listed once.
| # | Investment | Found in | Annual return | Volatility | Sharpe | Worst decline | 10Y return | Corr. with CRH | Expense |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Whole market | +17.4% | 22.9% | 0.82 | −31.4% | +685% | 0.43 | — | |
| 2 | Whole market | +21.3% | 25.6% | 0.89 | −30.3% | +816% | 0.31 | — | |
| 3 | Whole market | +22.4% | 22.3% | 1.02 | −46.3% | +347% | 0.32 | — | |
| 4 | Whole market | +17.3% | 18.2% | 0.97 | −40.0% | +352% | 0.59 | — | |
| 5 | Whole market | +19.2% | 22.4% | 0.90 | −42.0% | +311% | 0.41 | — | |
| 6 | Whole market | +42.1% | 24.7% | 1.55 | −46.1% | +349% | 0.23 | — | |
| 7 | CBOECboe Global Markets, Inc. · Capital Markets | Whole market | +21.5% | 25.1% | 0.91 | −43.2% | +463% | 0.14 | — |
| 8 | Whole market | +17.9% | 25.4% | 0.78 | −42.5% | +284% | 0.47 | — | |
| 9 | CASYCasey's General Stores, Inc. · Convenience Stores | Whole market | +29.9% | 29.3% | 1.04 | −36.1% | +537% | 0.29 | — |
| 10 | Whole market | +18.5% | 28.0% | 0.75 | −38.5% | +1,168% | 0.42 | — | |
| 11 | WRBW. R. Berkley Corporation · Property & Casualty Insurance | Whole market | +18.9% | 22.9% | 0.87 | −45.3% | +443% | 0.21 | — |
| 12 | RSReliance Steel & Aluminum Co. · Metals & Mining | Whole market | +24.8% | 28.1% | 0.93 | −40.8% | +626% | 0.51 | — |
| 13 | Same or nearby category | +22.7% | 27.7% | 0.88 | −40.5% | +955% | 0.58 | — | |
| 14 | ORIOld Republic International Corporation · Property & Casualty Insurance | Whole market | +17.0% | 22.2% | 0.82 | −47.8% | +349% | 0.47 | — |
| 15 | IXNiShares Global Tech ETF · Technology Equity | Whole market | +19.2% | 26.2% | 0.81 | −36.3% | +720% | 0.49 | 0.37% |
| 16 | Whole market | +20.8% | 22.6% | 0.96 | −25.7% | +508% | 0.42 | — | |
| 17 | NHCNational HealthCare Corporation · Medical - Care Facilities | Whole market | +32.0% | 28.5% | 1.12 | −35.3% | +394% | 0.31 | — |
| 18 | Whole market | +17.3% | 24.3% | 0.78 | −43.6% | +537% | 0.60 | — | |
| 19 | Whole market | +26.1% | 23.4% | 1.11 | −45.1% | +603% | 0.22 | — | |
| 20 | RSPTInvesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF · Technology Equity | Whole market | +16.9% | 25.1% | 0.75 | −33.7% | +572% | 0.55 | 0.40% |
| 21 | DXJWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund · International Equity | Whole market | +26.6% | 19.1% | 1.34 | −39.1% | +428% | 0.35 | 0.48% |
| 22 | LVHIFranklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +17.0% | 11.1% | 1.48 | −32.4% | +194% | 0.56 | 0.40% |
| 23 | Whole market | +21.0% | 23.4% | 0.94 | −42.9% | +242% | 0.35 | — | |
| 24 | Whole market | +16.8% | 26.1% | 0.73 | −42.0% | +374% | 0.25 | — | |
| 25 | Whole market | +38.7% | 25.0% | 1.44 | −38.1% | +586% | 0.16 | — | |
| 26 | Whole market | +17.1% | 20.7% | 0.87 | −26.8% | +226% | 0.39 | — | |
| 27 | Whole market | +19.6% | 24.9% | 0.85 | −24.9% | +266% | 0.17 | — | |
| 28 | Whole market | +22.8% | 24.9% | 0.95 | −30.5% | +200% | 0.19 | — | |
| 29 | BFCBank First Corporation · Banks - Regional | Whole market | +19.0% | 27.3% | 0.78 | −39.8% | +496% | 0.32 | — |
| 30 | Whole market | +19.9% | 22.3% | 0.93 | −42.5% | +361% | 0.57 | — | |
| 31 | Whole market | +17.7% | 18.9% | 0.96 | −26.4% | +213% | 0.23 | 0.40% | |
| 32 | Whole market | +33.7% | 29.4% | 1.14 | −47.6% | +474% | 0.33 | — | |
| 33 | Whole market | +22.6% | 29.1% | 0.85 | −41.6% | +521% | 0.20 | — | |
| 34 | Whole market | +19.2% | 21.6% | 0.93 | −47.3% | +395% | 0.61 | — | |
| 35 | Whole market | +24.2% | 22.8% | 1.07 | −32.4% | +406% | 0.39 | — | |
| 36 | Whole market | +26.3% | 24.9% | 1.07 | −41.6% | +654% | 0.53 | — | |
| 37 | Whole market | +17.2% | 24.9% | 0.77 | −30.4% | +285% | 0.37 | — | |
| 38 | NXTGFirst Trust Indxx NextG ETF · Technology | Whole market | +16.2% | 19.1% | 0.89 | −33.6% | +330% | 0.55 | 0.70% |
| 39 | Whole market | +17.0% | 26.2% | 0.73 | −41.4% | +356% | 0.12 | — | |
| 40 | Whole market | +17.9% | 26.1% | 0.76 | −37.9% | +314% | 0.59 | — | |
| 41 | SDCIUSCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund · Bonds | Whole market | +20.6% | 18.4% | 1.12 | −45.7% | — | -0.06 | 0.80% |
| 42 | SPMOInvesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF · US Momentum Equity | Whole market | +18.7% | 20.8% | 0.93 | −30.9% | +499% | 0.51 | 0.13% |
| 43 | DTMDT Midstream, Inc. · Oil & Gas Midstream | Whole market | +24.5% | 25.2% | 1.00 | −23.6% | — | 0.44 | — |
| 44 | RNRRenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd. · Insurance | Whole market | +20.1% | 27.8% | 0.80 | −40.7% | +215% | 0.14 | — |
| 45 | EWTiShares MSCI Taiwan ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +20.4% | 24.2% | 0.89 | −38.9% | +468% | 0.43 | 0.59% |
| 46 | Whole market | +16.3% | 24.8% | 0.74 | −43.4% | +241% | 0.06 | — | |
| 47 | Whole market | +19.7% | 23.2% | 0.90 | −48.8% | +292% | 0.37 | — | |
| 48 | EHCEncompass Health Corporation · Health Care Facilities | Whole market | +18.4% | 26.8% | 0.77 | −39.5% | +340% | 0.36 | — |
| 49 | MSGSMadison Square Garden Sports Corp. · Entertainment | Whole market | +18.4% | 25.6% | 0.79 | −41.6% | +432% | 0.28 | — |
| 50 | NEUNewMarket Corporation · Specialty Chemicals | Whole market | +21.0% | 26.8% | 0.85 | −40.7% | +165% | 0.45 | — |
| 51 | PPAInvesco Aerospace & Defense ETF · Aerospace & Defense | Whole market | +16.3% | 18.9% | 0.90 | −43.9% | +344% | 0.51 | 0.58% |
| 52 | AIRRFirst Trust RBA American Industrial RenaissanceTM ETF · US Industrials | Whole market | +18.3% | 25.9% | 0.78 | −42.4% | +407% | 0.68 | 0.69% |
| 53 | Same or nearby category | +19.9% | 29.0% | 0.77 | −44.0% | +444% | 0.65 | — | |
| 54 | ACTEnact Holdings Inc. · Insurance | Whole market | +20.5% | 24.3% | 0.89 | −20.2% | — | 0.45 | — |
| 55 | FLTWFranklin FTSE Taiwan ETF · Technology | Whole market | +21.8% | 24.3% | 0.94 | −38.0% | — | 0.42 | 0.19% |
| 56 | QTUMDefiance Quantum ETF · Technology | Whole market | +22.8% | 28.1% | 0.87 | −38.5% | — | 0.49 | 0.40% |
| 57 | Whole market | +23.5% | 18.8% | 1.22 | −75.2% | +350% | 0.35 | — | |
| 58 | GARPiShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +17.5% | 22.5% | 0.83 | −31.4% | — | 0.57 | 0.15% |
| 59 | FRDMFreedom 100 Emerging Markets ETF · International | Whole market | +17.3% | 22.8% | 0.82 | −40.5% | — | 0.51 | 0.49% |
| 60 | Whole market | +27.1% | 26.5% | 1.04 | −61.0% | +214% | 0.06 | — | |
| 61 | DBJPXtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF · International | Whole market | +20.9% | 19.2% | 1.09 | −31.3% | +348% | 0.43 | 0.45% |
| 62 | Whole market | +33.1% | 25.9% | 1.24 | −62.3% | +319% | 0.31 | — | |
| 63 | UMIUSCF Midstream Energy Income Fund · Energy | Whole market | +18.7% | 19.2% | 0.99 | −48.1% | — | 0.40 | 0.85% |
| 64 | Whole market | +33.2% | 29.4% | 1.13 | −54.9% | +483% | 0.27 | — | |
| 65 | VLGEAVillage Super Market, Inc. · Grocery Stores | Whole market | +17.8% | 28.3% | 0.72 | −46.8% | +96.3% | 0.25 | — |
| 66 | Whole market | +21.0% | 24.8% | 0.90 | −67.2% | +233% | -0.04 | — | |
| 67 | Whole market | +26.0% | 23.8% | 1.09 | −63.3% | +379% | 0.44 | — | |
| 68 | Whole market | +18.6% | 24.3% | 0.83 | −52.0% | +317% | 0.17 | — | |
| 69 | Whole market | +19.6% | 28.6% | 0.77 | −48.8% | +521% | 0.56 | — | |
| 70 | Whole market | +18.7% | 22.0% | 0.90 | −56.1% | +98.2% | 0.24 | — | |
| 71 | Whole market | +17.8% | 21.4% | 0.88 | −53.7% | +140% | 0.39 | — | |
| 72 | Whole market | +22.7% | 24.4% | 0.97 | −50.5% | +341% | 0.60 | — | |
| 73 | Whole market | +24.6% | 24.0% | 1.04 | −68.1% | +288% | 0.37 | — | |
| 74 | Whole market | +22.0% | 28.6% | 0.84 | −61.3% | +544% | 0.52 | — | |
| 75 | Whole market | +23.0% | 25.6% | 0.94 | −61.4% | +278% | 0.16 | — | |
| 76 | Whole market | +22.6% | 24.0% | 0.97 | −57.5% | +373% | 0.45 | — | |
| 77 | Whole market | +21.0% | 26.8% | 0.85 | −50.8% | +694% | 0.56 | — | |
| 78 | Whole market | +18.7% | 22.5% | 0.88 | −55.1% | +163% | 0.34 | — | |
| 79 | Whole market | +16.5% | 23.1% | 0.78 | −48.4% | +808% | 0.40 | — | |
| 80 | Whole market | +19.0% | 20.8% | 0.95 | −54.9% | +335% | 0.41 | — | |
| 81 | Whole market | +18.1% | 29.5% | 0.71 | −51.4% | +312% | 0.41 | — | |
| 82 | Whole market | +16.4% | 28.0% | 0.69 | −62.6% | +543% | 0.51 | — | |
| 83 | ACGLArch Capital Group Ltd. · Property & Casualty Insurance | Whole market | +20.1% | 24.5% | 0.87 | −53.8% | +309% | 0.19 | — |
| 84 | Whole market | +17.3% | 27.8% | 0.71 | −57.7% | +809% | 0.35 | — | |
| 85 | KOFCoca-Cola FEMSA, S.A.B. de C.V. · Food & Beverages | Whole market | +22.3% | 24.7% | 0.94 | −55.1% | +119% | 0.43 | — |
| 86 | IHGInterContinental Hotels Group PLC · Hotels & Resorts | Whole market | +21.4% | 26.6% | 0.86 | −59.3% | +383% | 0.58 | — |
| 87 | PAAPlains All American Pipeline, L.P. · Oil & Gas Midstream | Whole market | +27.0% | 25.6% | 1.06 | −87.9% | +64.0% | 0.28 | — |
| 88 | BCHBanco de Chile · Banks | Whole market | +25.2% | 28.2% | 0.94 | −58.4% | +180% | 0.19 | — |
| 89 | UNMUnum Group · Life Insurance | Whole market | +30.6% | 29.3% | 1.06 | −81.0% | +256% | 0.14 | — |
| 90 | WESWestern Midstream Partners, LP · Oil & Gas Midstream | Whole market | +23.5% | 27.6% | 0.91 | −91.9% | +128% | 0.40 | — |
| 91 | CLHClean Harbors, Inc. · Environmental Services | Whole market | +23.1% | 28.6% | 0.88 | −64.5% | +588% | 0.41 | — |
| 92 | RGAReinsurance Group of America, Incorporated · Insurance | Whole market | +19.7% | 27.3% | 0.80 | −65.8% | +199% | 0.26 | — |
| 93 | Same or nearby category | +27.4% | 28.8% | 0.99 | −54.7% | +789% | 0.70 | — | |
| 94 | BSACBanco Santander-Chile · Banks | Whole market | +19.5% | 29.0% | 0.76 | −63.9% | +154% | 0.32 | — |
| 95 | ARMKAramark · Food Services | Whole market | +17.9% | 28.5% | 0.72 | −72.3% | +137% | 0.29 | — |
| 96 | OHIOmega Healthcare Investors, Inc. · Healthcare REITs | Whole market | +16.4% | 24.2% | 0.75 | −66.9% | +202% | 0.32 | — |
| 97 | ENSGThe Ensign Group, Inc. · Health Care Facilities | Whole market | +19.8% | 26.8% | 0.81 | −55.5% | +896% | 0.36 | — |
| 98 | AMAntero Midstream Corporation · Oil & Gas Midstream | Whole market | +20.0% | 25.9% | 0.84 | −92.9% | — | 0.34 | — |
| 99 | PSOPearson plc · Education Services | Whole market | +18.5% | 27.9% | 0.75 | −58.4% | +155% | 0.27 | — |
| 100 | Same or nearby category | +25.6% | 26.2% | 1.00 | −64.1% | +264% | 0.51 | — |
CRH against its popular alternatives
The investments people most often weigh against CRH, compared period by period and year by year.
How do CRH's risk and return compare with its alternatives?
This map plots each investment's annual return over the past 5 years against its volatility, the size of its typical price swings. Investments toward the upper left earned more for a smoother ride, and those toward the lower right earned less for a rougher one. The dashed lines cross at CRH, which divides the map into what did better or worse on each measure.
- None of the 18 popular alternatives earned more than CRH over the past 5 years with smaller price swings, so every higher return on the map came with a bumpier ride.
- 11 of the 18 popular alternatives earned less than CRH over the past 5 years while swinging more, the weaker corner of the map.
- Over the past 5 years, CRH returned 15.2% a year, more than the S&P 500's 12.7%, with higher volatility (31.4% against 17.1%).
Green points earned more than CRH with less volatility; red points earned less with more. Hover over a point for its figures. Total returns with dividends reinvested, annualized.
All figures
| Investment | Annual return | Volatility |
|---|---|---|
| PWR Quanta Services, Inc. | +39.3% | 37.2% |
| USLM United States Lime & Minerals, Inc. | +35.6% | 36.1% |
| CAT Caterpillar Inc. | +31.1% | 31.9% |
| URI United Rentals, Inc. | +24.3% | 39.1% |
| NUE Nucor Corporation | +21.8% | 37.4% |
| CRH This pageCRH plc | +15.2% | 31.4% |
| VMI Valmont Industries, Inc. | +13.8% | 32.7% |
| CXT Crane NXT, Co. | +12.9% | 33.3% |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | +12.7% | 17.1% |
| BCC Boise Cascade Company | +11.0% | 41.1% |
| SSD Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. | +10.3% | 31.7% |
| CX CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. | +8.1% | 39.6% |
| VMC Vulcan Materials Company | +8.0% | 26.6% |
| MLM Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. | +6.5% | 27.1% |
| OC Owens Corning | +6.2% | 36.1% |
| EXP Eagle Materials Inc. | +4.5% | 32.9% |
| LPX Louisiana-Pacific Corporation | +3.5% | 40.2% |
| WFG West Fraser Timber Co. Ltd. | −4.0% | 34.1% |
| JHX James Hardie Industries plc | −6.8% | 44.5% |
| ROCK Gibraltar Industries, Inc. | −12.2% | 41.7% |
Has CRH consistently beaten its popular alternatives?
This section compares CRH with the investments people most often weigh against it, checking each one over eight periods from one month to ten years. Counting how often an alternative earned more than CRH helps separate lasting outperformance from a single strong stretch.
- Six of the 19 popular alternatives, led by URI, NUE and PWR, outperformed CRH in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes.
- URI, NUE and PWR outperformed CRH in every long-term period and in all but one short-term period, the most consistent record in the group.
- PWR, USLM and CAT earned more for the risk they took than CRH (a higher Sharpe ratio) and fell less in their worst decline of the past 10 years.
A green cell means the alternative earned more than CRH over that period. "Qualified" marks those that did so in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods.
| Investment | Periods outperformed | Short term | Long term | Risk · 5 years | Fund | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1M | 3M | 6M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | 10Y | Volatilitylower is calmer | Sharpehigher is better | Worst declinepast 10 years | Expense | Assets | Overlapsame sectors | ||
| CRH CRH plc (this page) | — | −2.2% | −14.4% | −27.6% | −31.8% | −26.4% | +64.2% | +103% | +236% | 31.4% | 0.61 | −53.3% | — | $57B | — |
| URI QualifiedUnited Rentals, Inc. | 5/5 short3/3 longAll-weather | +1.4% | +3.3% | +29.0% | +24.3% | +5.2% | +164% | +196% | +1,270% | 39.1% | 0.75 | −63.3% | — | $65B | — |
| NUE QualifiedNucor Corporation | 5/5 short3/3 longAll-weather | +8.1% | +13.6% | +29.9% | +55.6% | +93.7% | +92.9% | +167% | +569% | 37.4% | 0.72 | −57.2% | — | $59B | — |
| PWR QualifiedQuanta Services, Inc. | 4/5 short3/3 longAll-weather | −7.2% | −5.8% | −1.5% | +35.6% | +35.3% | +263% | +425% | +2,045% | 37.2% | 1.08 | −45.5% | — | $90B | — |
| USLM QualifiedUnited States Lime & Minerals, Inc. | 4/5 short3/3 longAll-weather | −7.0% | +1.4% | −22.5% | −11.8% | −21.2% | +166% | +359% | +803% | 36.1% | 1.03 | −45.9% | — | $3.1B | — |
| CAT QualifiedCaterpillar Inc. | 3/5 short3/3 long | −11.2% | −15.9% | −8.8% | +22.2% | +37.7% | +203% | +288% | +936% | 31.9% | 1.01 | −43.4% | — | $333B | — |
| VMI QualifiedValmont Industries, Inc. | 3/5 short2/3 long | −3.8% | −14.2% | +10.3% | +10.0% | +10.9% | +98.7% | +91.1% | +288% | 32.7% | 0.56 | −48.9% | — | $8.7B | — |
| BCC Paper, Lumber & Forest ProductsBoise Cascade Company | 5/5 short1/3 long | +0.8% | +0.8% | −8.6% | +3.8% | +8.7% | −6.6% | +68.3% | +383% | 41.1% | 0.46 | −56.5% | — | $2.7B | — |
| SSD Construction MaterialsSimpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. | 5/5 short1/3 long | +4.1% | −2.6% | +0.2% | +10.2% | +3.3% | +39.6% | +63.6% | +369% | 31.7% | 0.47 | −44.5% | — | $7.4B | — |
| LPX Paper, Lumber & Forest ProductsLouisiana-Pacific Corporation | 5/5 short1/3 long | +11.2% | +1.9% | −1.0% | −10.4% | −19.0% | +40.9% | +18.7% | +347% | 40.2% | 0.28 | −59.5% | — | $5.1B | — |
| CX Construction MaterialsCEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. | 4/5 short1/3 long | +2.5% | −17.5% | −14.0% | −10.5% | +8.4% | +76.2% | +47.3% | +25.2% | 39.6% | 0.39 | −83.7% | — | $15B | — |
| CXT Industrial - MachineryCrane NXT, Co. | 5/5 short0/3 long | +22.1% | +9.7% | +21.4% | +18.4% | −16.0% | +14.2% | +83.7% | +213% | 33.3% | 0.53 | −60.0% | — | $3.2B | — |
| MLM Construction MaterialsMartin Marietta Materials, Inc. | 5/5 short0/3 long | +1.6% | −8.2% | −18.8% | −19.7% | −18.6% | +26.0% | +37.1% | +206% | 27.1% | 0.37 | −48.3% | — | $30B | — |
| VMC Construction MaterialsVulcan Materials Company | 5/5 short0/3 long | +6.4% | −6.5% | −10.8% | −10.0% | −10.7% | +32.9% | +46.8% | +159% | 26.6% | 0.42 | −49.2% | — | $34B | — |
| JHX Construction MaterialsJames Hardie Industries plc | 5/5 short0/3 long | −0.8% | +5.9% | +20.4% | +27.1% | +24.3% | +7.6% | −29.7% | +93.2% | 44.5% | 0.07 | −60.3% | — | $15B | — |
| WFG Paper, Lumber & Forest ProductsWest Fraser Timber Co. Ltd. | 4/5 short0/3 long | −7.5% | −2.2% | +2.2% | +7.2% | +3.0% | +4.4% | −18.5% | +149% | 34.1% | 0.05 | −78.7% | — | $5.0B | — |
| OC Construction MaterialsOwens Corning | 3/5 short0/3 long | −7.4% | −19.9% | −8.7% | +0.6% | −9.9% | −3.4% | +35.3% | +158% | 36.1% | 0.35 | −66.6% | — | $8.8B | — |
| ROCK Manufacturing - Metal FabricationGibraltar Industries, Inc. | 3/5 short0/3 long | −7.9% | −11.9% | −4.6% | −23.4% | −45.7% | −36.9% | −47.8% | +8.6% | 41.7% | -0.10 | −66.5% | — | $1.1B | — |
| EXP Construction MaterialsEagle Materials Inc. | 2/5 short0/3 long | −3.6% | −14.3% | −16.0% | −18.0% | −27.0% | +12.9% | +24.5% | +138% | 32.9% | 0.30 | −63.8% | — | $5.3B | — |
| KNF Construction MaterialsKnife River Corporation | 2/5 short0/3 long | −7.6% | −34.9% | −42.9% | −29.6% | −21.0% | +2.6% | — | — | — | — | −55.3% | — | $2.9B | — |
How did CRH do year by year?
This table shows each investment's total return in every full calendar year since 1997, along with where CRH ranked among its popular alternatives each year. Annual results reveal how consistently each one kept pace with CRH and how far its good and bad years diverged, detail that multiyear averages tend to smooth over.
- CRH finished ahead of the S&P 500 in 14 of its 29 full calendar years, and ahead of it in each of the last three.
- Ranked against its popular alternatives each year, CRH finished in the top quarter in nine of 29 years and in the bottom quarter in two. In 2025, it ranked 4 of 20.
- Among its popular alternatives, PWR came out ahead of CRH most often, in 16 of the 27 years both traded.
Newest year first. Green marks a year in which the fund came out ahead of CRH; gray means the two finished within a fraction of a point. The rank row places CRH among the alternatives that traded the full year; dark green is the top quarter and red the bottom quarter.
| Investment | Years ahead of CRH | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | 1998 | 1997 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRH This pageCRH plc | — | +36.9% | +35.9% | +81.3% | −20.5% | +27.1% | +8.8% | +57.0% | −25.2% | +7.1% | +22.3% | +23.1% | −3.0% | +30.4% | +7.1% | −0.5% | −20.8% | +17.6% | −23.1% | −16.4% | +45.4% | +12.4% | +35.4% | +67.8% | −27.7% | −4.1% | −17.2% | +23.0% | +57.0% | +14.5% |
| Rank among alternatives | Top quarter in 9 of 29 | 4 of 20 | 5 of 20 | 5 of 19 | 12 of 19 | 15 of 19 | 15 of 19 | 5 of 19 | 12 of 19 | 14 of 19 | 15 of 19 | 5 of 19 | 10 of 19 | 5 of 18 | 14 of 18 | 9 of 18 | 18 of 18 | 12 of 18 | 7 of 18 | 11 of 17 | 4 of 16 | 13 of 16 | 8 of 16 | 7 of 16 | 12 of 16 | 12 of 16 | 8 of 15 | 3 of 14 | 3 of 13 | 7 of 12 |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 15 of 29 | +17.7% | +24.9% | +26.2% | −18.2% | +28.7% | +18.3% | +31.2% | −4.6% | +21.7% | +12.0% | +1.2% | +13.5% | +32.3% | +16.0% | +1.9% | +15.1% | +26.4% | −36.8% | +5.1% | +15.9% | +4.8% | +10.7% | +28.2% | −21.6% | −11.7% | −9.8% | +20.4% | +28.7% | +33.5% |
| URI United Rentals, Inc. | 15 of 28 | +15.9% | +24.0% | +63.6% | +7.0% | +43.3% | +39.1% | +62.6% | −40.4% | +62.8% | +45.6% | −28.9% | +30.9% | +71.3% | +54.0% | +29.9% | +132% | +7.5% | −50.3% | −27.8% | +8.7% | +23.8% | −1.9% | +79.0% | −52.6% | +68.9% | −21.5% | −48.3% | +71.5% | — |
| NUE Nucor Corporation | 16 of 29 | +42.0% | −31.9% | +33.8% | +17.4% | +118% | −1.8% | +11.9% | −16.4% | +9.6% | +52.2% | −14.9% | −5.4% | +27.6% | +13.1% | −6.3% | −2.8% | +4.2% | −19.4% | +12.8% | +70.5% | +30.9% | +89.1% | +37.7% | −20.6% | +35.7% | −26.6% | +28.2% | −9.4% | −4.5% |
| PWR Quanta Services, Inc. | 16 of 27 | +33.7% | +46.6% | +51.7% | +24.6% | +59.5% | +77.8% | +35.8% | −22.9% | +12.2% | +72.1% | −28.7% | −10.1% | +15.7% | +26.7% | +8.1% | −4.4% | +5.3% | −24.6% | +33.5% | +49.3% | +64.7% | +9.5% | +109% | −77.3% | −52.1% | +71.0% | +28.0% | — | — |
| USLM United States Lime & Minerals, Inc. | 15 of 29 | −9.6% | +189% | +64.4% | +9.9% | +13.7% | +27.2% | +35.1% | −7.4% | +2.5% | +39.0% | −23.9% | +20.1% | +29.8% | −21.6% | +42.5% | +22.1% | +44.2% | −21.0% | +0.6% | +14.0% | +134% | +67.2% | +85.6% | −33.0% | +14.8% | −27.5% | −1.7% | 0.0% | −15.2% |
| CAT Caterpillar Inc. | 16 of 29 | +60.3% | +24.7% | +25.9% | +18.6% | +16.0% | +27.0% | +19.5% | −17.6% | +75.0% | +42.1% | −23.0% | +3.5% | +3.4% | +1.6% | −1.5% | +68.5% | +33.2% | −36.8% | +20.5% | +7.8% | +20.7% | +19.7% | +86.1% | −9.8% | +13.7% | +4.1% | +4.7% | −3.0% | +31.2% |
| VMI Valmont Industries, Inc. | 14 of 29 | +32.2% | +32.5% | −28.7% | +33.1% | +44.4% | +18.6% | +36.5% | −32.4% | +18.9% | +34.4% | −15.4% | −14.0% | +9.9% | +51.4% | +3.1% | +14.0% | +28.9% | −30.7% | +61.5% | +67.2% | +34.8% | +10.1% | +21.0% | +36.3% | −20.0% | +16.2% | +17.6% | −27.7% | −4.3% |
| BCC Boise Cascade Company | 7 of 12 | −37.5% | −4.0% | +107% | +1.5% | +62.2% | +37.0% | +59.1% | −38.4% | +77.7% | −11.9% | −31.3% | +26.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| SSD Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. | 15 of 29 | −1.9% | −15.7% | +125% | −35.6% | +50.2% | +17.5% | +50.8% | −4.4% | +33.5% | +30.4% | +0.4% | −4.7% | +13.3% | −0.2% | +10.7% | +16.7% | −1.4% | +6.1% | −15.0% | −12.1% | +4.8% | +38.0% | +54.6% | +14.8% | +12.4% | +16.5% | +16.9% | +12.3% | +44.9% |
| LPX Louisiana-Pacific Corporation | 11 of 29 | −21.1% | +47.9% | +21.5% | −23.4% | +113% | +27.9% | +36.4% | −13.7% | +38.7% | +5.1% | +8.7% | −10.5% | −4.2% | +139% | −14.7% | +35.6% | +346% | −88.3% | −34.4% | −19.5% | +4.7% | +51.4% | +122% | −4.4% | −14.9% | −24.1% | −20.7% | −0.9% | −7.5% |
| CX CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. | 12 of 26 | +106% | −26.4% | +91.1% | −40.2% | +31.0% | +37.1% | −19.7% | −35.6% | −2.9% | +49.8% | −43.1% | −10.4% | +24.7% | +90.6% | −47.7% | −5.7% | +34.5% | −62.1% | −19.9% | +20.1% | +69.0% | +45.4% | +28.8% | −9.3% | +43.8% | −32.2% | — | — | — |
| CXT Crane NXT, Co. | 14 of 29 | −18.2% | +3.5% | +64.9% | +0.6% | +33.4% | −7.7% | +22.0% | −17.8% | +25.8% | +54.1% | −16.7% | −11.1% | +48.3% | +1.8% | +16.2% | +37.7% | +84.3% | −58.7% | +18.9% | +5.3% | +24.2% | −4.7% | +57.1% | −21.0% | −8.3% | +45.4% | −29.9% | +5.7% | +51.5% |
| MLM Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. | 14 of 29 | +21.3% | +4.1% | +48.6% | −22.7% | +56.1% | +2.6% | +64.2% | −21.5% | +0.6% | +63.7% | +25.1% | +11.8% | +7.7% | +27.6% | −16.5% | +5.2% | −6.1% | −25.7% | +28.8% | +36.9% | +44.9% | +16.1% | +56.3% | −33.1% | +11.6% | +4.5% | −33.4% | +72.1% | +59.8% |
| VMC Vulcan Materials Company | 15 of 29 | +11.7% | +14.1% | +30.8% | −14.9% | +41.1% | +4.1% | +47.1% | −22.3% | +3.2% | +32.7% | +45.1% | +11.0% | +14.2% | +32.5% | −9.5% | −13.7% | −21.7% | −9.1% | −10.3% | +35.1% | +26.4% | +17.4% | +30.2% | −20.0% | +2.1% | +22.2% | −7.3% | +31.2% | +71.8% |
| JHX James Hardie Industries plc | 14 of 25 | −32.6% | −20.3% | +116% | −55.4% | +41.6% | +51.0% | +71.4% | −31.7% | +13.3% | +28.6% | +20.9% | +1.6% | +23.9% | +47.1% | 0.0% | −7.7% | +134% | −41.2% | −22.2% | +18.0% | +26.7% | +2.1% | +47.3% | +32.1% | +140% | — | — | — | — |
| WFG West Fraser Timber Co. Ltd. | 9 of 18 | −28.1% | +2.6% | +20.3% | −23.1% | +49.9% | +47.9% | −8.8% | −19.5% | +73.5% | −5.0% | −33.0% | +17.0% | +32.7% | +83.3% | −13.0% | +51.1% | +40.9% | −24.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| OC Owens Corning | 8 of 19 | −33.0% | +16.6% | +77.2% | −4.2% | +20.9% | +18.1% | +50.6% | −51.7% | +80.3% | +11.2% | +33.5% | −10.5% | +10.1% | +28.8% | −7.8% | +21.5% | +48.2% | −14.5% | −32.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ROCK Gibraltar Industries, Inc. | 12 of 29 | −16.1% | −25.4% | +72.1% | −31.2% | −7.3% | +42.6% | +41.7% | +7.8% | −20.8% | +63.7% | +56.5% | −12.5% | +16.6% | +14.3% | +2.9% | −13.7% | +31.7% | −21.4% | −33.6% | +3.1% | −2.0% | +41.8% | +33.3% | +9.5% | +0.5% | −24.3% | +3.1% | +15.2% | −24.8% |
| EXP Eagle Materials Inc. | 16 of 29 | −15.9% | +22.1% | +53.6% | −19.6% | +65.1% | +12.0% | +49.2% | −45.9% | +15.5% | +63.9% | −20.1% | −1.4% | +33.1% | +130% | −7.5% | +10.2% | +43.8% | −46.7% | −16.4% | +7.8% | +43.4% | +61.9% | +72.2% | +10.5% | +18.2% | −29.4% | −3.7% | +35.7% | +68.9% |
| KNF Knife River Corporation | 1 of 2 | −30.8% | +53.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Risk and diversification
How CRH has fallen, how it held up in crashes beside the S&P 500 and its popular alternatives, and what moves independently of it.
What were CRH's worst declines?
A drawdown is the decline from a peak to the lowest point before a new high. This section presents CRH's five deepest drawdowns since it began trading in 1989, alongside the S&P 500's return over the same dates, and how long each took to recover. Together, these figures show how much an investor could have lost and how long it took to get back to even.
- In all five of CRH's worst declines, the S&P 500 held up better over the same dates.
- Not every decline was the market's doing: CRH fell 39.0% from January to October 2026, while the S&P 500 rose 11.8%.
- The slowest recovery came after CRH fell 65.6% from July 2007 to August 2010; it did not regain that peak until January 2017, six years later.
Green means CRH fell less than the S&P 500 over the same dates. Based on daily closing prices with dividends reinvested.
| During | CRH fell | S&P 500, same dates | Peak | Low | Time to the low | Back at the peak | Time to recover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 financial crisis | −65.6% | −26.4% | Jul 2007 | Aug 2010 | 3.1 years | Jan 2017 | 6.4 years |
| Covid crash | −53.3% | −26.1% | Jan 2020 | Mar 2020 | 2 months | Aug 2020 | 5 months |
| Dot-com bust | −51.9% | −38.6% | Jan 2000 | Oct 2002 | 2.8 years | Jan 2004 | 15 months |
| No named crash | −39.0% | +11.8% | Jan 2026 | Oct 2026 | 9 months | Not yet | — |
| 2022 bear market | −38.7% | −23.0% | Jan 2022 | Sep 2022 | 8 months | Mar 2023 | 6 months |
How did CRH do in stock market crashes?
This section measures how far CRH, the S&P 500 and each alternative fell from peak to trough during every major market crash since 2000. A smaller decline means an investment held up better, and comparing results across crashes shows whether that resilience was consistent or a one-off.
- CRH fell further than the S&P 500 in eight of the ten crashes it has traded through. The clearest case was the Covid crash, when CRH fell 49.8% and the S&P 500 fell 33.7%.
- Among its popular alternatives, MLM held up best, falling less than CRH in seven of the ten crashes they both traded through.
Newest crash first. Each figure is the fund's deepest fall within the crash window; green means a smaller fall than CRH.
| Investment | Held up better | 2023 regional bank crisisMar 2023 | 2022 bear marketJan 2022 | Covid crashFeb 2020 | Late-2018 sell-offSep 2018 | February 2018 volatility shockFeb 2018 | 2015 China and oil sell-offAug 2015 | 2011 euro debt crisisJul 2011 | 2010 flash crashMay 2010 | 2008 financial crisisOct 2007 | Dot-com bustMar 2000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRH This pageCRH plc | — | −5.6% | −38.7% | −49.8% | −24.6% | −7.5% | −22.8% | −30.2% | −1.0% | −57.1% | −44.6% |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 8 of 10 | −3.4% | −24.5% | −33.7% | −19.3% | −6.5% | −12.8% | −17.9% | −1.5% | −55.2% | −47.5% |
| URI United Rentals, Inc. | 2 of 10 | −14.5% | −35.4% | −55.3% | −43.3% | −6.7% | −45.7% | −50.5% | −3.6% | −91.2% | −77.3% |
| NUE Nucor Corporation | 5 of 10 | −10.3% | −40.8% | −41.5% | −23.5% | −6.0% | −24.3% | −23.9% | 0.0% | −68.3% | −44.8% |
| PWR Quanta Services, Inc. | 5 of 10 | −4.0% | −21.7% | −40.8% | −22.1% | −7.1% | −35.4% | −21.6% | −1.7% | −69.6% | −97.1% |
| USLM United States Lime & Minerals, Inc. | 6 of 10 | −10.1% | −21.6% | −26.9% | −11.5% | −4.0% | −21.0% | −11.6% | −0.7% | −59.1% | −54.2% |
| CAT Caterpillar Inc. | 3 of 10 | −9.7% | −30.1% | −33.1% | −28.5% | −7.3% | −26.0% | −33.2% | −2.2% | −73.3% | −42.5% |
| VMI Valmont Industries, Inc. | 6 of 10 | −5.9% | −17.6% | −44.1% | −25.8% | −5.3% | −17.0% | −29.6% | −2.7% | −67.9% | −37.8% |
| BCC Boise Cascade Company | 2 of 6 | −6.4% | −34.8% | −49.6% | −42.5% | −6.5% | −43.7% | — | — | — | — |
| SSD Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. | 5 of 10 | −5.9% | −42.9% | −42.3% | −32.1% | −4.2% | −20.2% | −16.2% | −3.9% | −57.2% | −25.7% |
| LPX Louisiana-Pacific Corporation | 3 of 10 | −4.7% | −37.5% | −58.8% | −27.0% | −7.0% | −26.3% | −43.5% | −0.7% | −93.4% | −62.8% |
| CX CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. | 1 of 10 | −7.1% | −51.9% | −57.1% | −35.8% | −9.4% | −54.3% | −65.5% | −2.6% | −87.4% | −37.5% |
| CXT Crane NXT, Co. | 3 of 10 | −7.4% | −23.6% | −54.8% | −32.0% | −8.0% | −20.3% | −32.0% | −4.2% | −77.3% | −39.6% |
| MLM Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. | 7 of 10 | −8.1% | −32.7% | −44.1% | −20.2% | −4.8% | −33.6% | −21.8% | 0.0% | −56.3% | −45.3% |
| VMC Vulcan Materials Company | 4 of 10 | −7.2% | −32.5% | −43.4% | −27.1% | −7.3% | −22.8% | −26.4% | −1.3% | −61.0% | −39.7% |
| JHX James Hardie Industries plc | 5 of 10 | −3.5% | −52.3% | −54.3% | −33.4% | −6.6% | −25.1% | −22.6% | 0.0% | −71.2% | −38.2% |
| WFG West Fraser Timber Co. Ltd. | 6 of 9 | −4.0% | −31.1% | −66.5% | −22.2% | −8.6% | −32.7% | −28.2% | 0.0% | −46.8% | — |
| OC Owens Corning | 2 of 9 | −6.4% | −26.0% | −53.3% | −28.9% | −8.2% | −15.7% | −43.5% | −4.1% | −81.0% | — |
| ROCK Gibraltar Industries, Inc. | 2 of 10 | −9.9% | −45.4% | −43.3% | −29.2% | −10.1% | −31.2% | −31.6% | −7.5% | −81.7% | −38.6% |
| EXP Eagle Materials Inc. | 2 of 10 | −7.5% | −37.8% | −52.3% | −33.9% | −7.3% | −44.4% | −37.6% | −3.5% | −63.6% | −30.4% |
How closely does CRH move with the S&P 500?
Upside capture measures how much of the S&P 500's gains an investment kept in the months the market rose, and downside capture how much of its losses it took in the months the market fell. An investment that captures more of the gains than the losses has compounded ahead of the market over time. This section compares CRH with its popular alternatives on both measures, and on beta (how strongly each has moved with the market), over the past 10 years.
- Ten of the 18 popular alternatives had a higher capture ratio (upside capture divided by downside capture) than CRH's 0.81, led by PWR, USLM and CAT.
- PWR took just 61% of the S&P 500's losses, against 137% for CRH, while still keeping 141% of its gains.
- Over the past 10 years, CRH captured 111% of the S&P 500's gains in rising months and 137% of its losses in falling months, with a beta of 1.20. It amplified the market's moves in both directions.
Monthly total returns over the past 10 years, measured against SPY. 100% capture or a beta of 1.00 means moving in line with the S&P 500. Green marks a better figure than CRH's: more upside, less downside or a higher capture ratio. Sorted by capture ratio.
| Investment | Upside capture | Downside capture | Capture ratio | Beta |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRH This pageCRH plc | 111% | 137% | 0.81 | 1.20 |
| PWR Quanta Services, Inc. | 141% | 61% | 2.31 | 1.22 |
| USLM United States Lime & Minerals, Inc. | 111% | 65% | 1.70 | 0.68 |
| CAT Caterpillar Inc. | 148% | 122% | 1.21 | 1.27 |
| URI United Rentals, Inc. | 177% | 165% | 1.07 | 1.90 |
| VMI Valmont Industries, Inc. | 105% | 115% | 0.91 | 1.27 |
| SSD Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. | 117% | 129% | 0.91 | 1.30 |
| MLM Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. | 83% | 93% | 0.90 | 0.88 |
| NUE Nucor Corporation | 154% | 176% | 0.87 | 1.65 |
| BCC Boise Cascade Company | 136% | 163% | 0.84 | 1.52 |
| VMC Vulcan Materials Company | 75% | 91% | 0.83 | 0.83 |
| LPX Louisiana-Pacific Corporation | 154% | 201% | 0.76 | 1.73 |
| CXT Crane NXT, Co. | 108% | 147% | 0.73 | 1.38 |
| OC Owens Corning | 115% | 160% | 0.72 | 1.44 |
| WFG West Fraser Timber Co. Ltd. | 127% | 180% | 0.71 | 1.68 |
| EXP Eagle Materials Inc. | 108% | 153% | 0.71 | 1.31 |
| JHX James Hardie Industries plc | 119% | 189% | 0.63 | 1.56 |
| CX CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. | 104% | 183% | 0.57 | 1.39 |
| ROCK Gibraltar Industries, Inc. | 73% | 138% | 0.53 | 1.17 |
What diversifies CRH?
Correlation measures how closely two investments move together, on a scale from 1 (in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to -1 (in opposite directions). This section lists large ETFs and stocks whose returns have had a low correlation with CRH's. Because such investments tend not to fall at the same time, pairing CRH with them can reduce a portfolio's overall swings.
- Moving a fifth of the money in CRH into DBMF would have cut the portfolio's volatility by 22% over the past 5 years and raised its annual return (+15.2% for CRH alone, +15.4% for the mix).
- Among large ETFs, DXJ, EMLP and SMH have moved largely independently of CRH over the past 5 years, with correlations of 0.49 or lower, and each still earned a positive 5-year return.
- MCK made money in seven of the ten calendar years in which CRH lost money.
Only ETFs with at least $1.0B in assets and stocks worth at least $10B, with a correlation below 0.5 over the past 5 years and a positive return, are included, ranked by Sharpe ratio; funds that hold the same thing are shown once. The year columns are the years in which CRH lost money. The last two columns show a portfolio that is 80% CRH and 20% the other investment, rebalanced monthly.
ETFs
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2022 | 2018 | 2014 | 2011 | 2010 | 2008 | 2007 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRH CRH plc (this page) | 1.00 | +103% | 0.61 | −20.5% | −25.2% | −3.0% | −0.5% | −20.8% | −23.1% | −16.4% | −27.7% | −4.1% | −17.2% | 30.7% | +15.2% |
| DXJ InternationalWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund | 0.35 | +225% | 1.34 | +6.0% | −19.8% | +8.1% | −16.1% | −1.8% | −20.8% | −7.4% | — | — | — | 25.6% | +18.2% |
| EMLP Broad MarketFirst Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund | 0.47 | +101% | 1.04 | +10.4% | −8.7% | +23.8% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 26.1% | +15.9% |
| SMH TechnologyVanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.49 | +323% | 0.97 | −33.5% | −9.1% | +30.2% | +6.8% | +19.0% | −44.7% | +6.0% | −47.0% | −14.6% | — | 28.6% | +20.4% |
| GLD CommoditiesSPDR Gold Shares | 0.23 | +126% | 0.96 | −0.8% | −1.9% | −2.2% | +9.6% | +29.3% | +4.9% | +30.4% | — | — | — | 25.6% | +16.7% |
| XLE EnergyState Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | 0.18 | +177% | 0.93 | +64.4% | −18.2% | −8.7% | +2.8% | +21.9% | −39.0% | +36.8% | −14.8% | −18.2% | +24.4% | 26.0% | +17.9% |
| EWT TechnologyiShares MSCI Taiwan ETF | 0.43 | +153% | 0.89 | −28.9% | −9.9% | +7.0% | −21.8% | +22.8% | −45.3% | +6.4% | −24.4% | +2.1% | — | 27.2% | +17.3% |
| AMLP EnergyAlerian MLP ETF | 0.34 | +111% | 0.89 | +25.5% | −12.6% | +4.8% | +10.2% | — | — | — | — | — | — | 26.1% | +16.6% |
| DBMF AlternativesiMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF | -0.36 | +59.7% | 0.82 | +21.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 23.8% | +15.4% |
Stocks
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2022 | 2018 | 2014 | 2011 | 2010 | 2008 | 2007 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRH CRH plc (this page) | 1.00 | +103% | 0.61 | −20.5% | −25.2% | −3.0% | −0.5% | −20.8% | −23.1% | −16.4% | −27.7% | −4.1% | −17.2% | 30.7% | +15.2% |
| CAH Medical - DistributionCardinal Health, Inc. | 0.23 | +479% | 1.55 | +54.1% | −24.5% | +23.0% | +8.1% | +21.4% | −39.6% | −9.8% | −8.3% | −2.5% | +108% | 26.3% | +20.6% |
| CLS Hardware, Equipment & PartsCelestica Inc. | 0.40 | +3,143% | 1.47 | +1.3% | −16.3% | +12.9% | −24.4% | +2.8% | −20.5% | −25.7% | −65.1% | −25.6% | −2.3% | 31.1% | +32.8% |
| FIX Engineering & ConstructionComfort Systems USA, Inc. | 0.48 | +1,636% | 1.46 | +17.0% | +0.8% | −10.4% | −17.0% | +8.7% | −15.2% | +2.1% | −9.4% | +73.7% | −71.1% | 29.9% | +28.7% |
| MCK Medical - DistributionMcKesson Corporation | 0.16 | +413% | 1.44 | +51.8% | −28.4% | +29.3% | +11.8% | +13.8% | −40.4% | +29.7% | −27.2% | +4.9% | +61.2% | 25.9% | +20.1% |
| MPC Oil & Gas Refining & MarketingMarathon Petroleum Corporation | 0.13 | +690% | 1.41 | +86.6% | −8.2% | +0.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 26.2% | +22.8% |
Common questions
What was CRH's worst drawdown?
CRH's deepest decline since it began trading in 1989 was 65.6%, from July 2007 to August 2010. It took about six years from the low to climb back to its old high.
What were CRH's best and worst years?
Over 29 full calendar years, CRH's best year was 2023, when it returned 81.3%. Its worst was 2002, with a return of -27.7%.
Is there a better investment than CRH?
Among CRH's popular alternatives, CAT earned more for the risk it took than CRH over the past 5 years, and its worst fall in 10 years was 43.4%, against 53.3% for CRH. Looking beyond its popular alternatives, TT (building products) and CMI (industrial machinery) earned more than CRH with less volatility over the past 5 years. TT returned 22.7% a year at 27.7% volatility, against 15.2% a year at 31.4%.
Is CRH more volatile than the S&P 500?
Yes. CRH's volatility over the past 5 years was 31.4%, 1.8 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, CRH's return lands within 31.4% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump.
What is CRH's Sharpe ratio?
CRH's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.61, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so CRH earned less for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings.
How correlated is CRH with the S&P 500?
Over the past 5 years, CRH's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.67 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They often move together: some diversification next to an index fund, but not a cushion. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against CRH instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a CRH holding.
What are the best alternatives to CRH?
Of the 19 popular alternatives we compared, six outperformed CRH in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes, with dividends reinvested: URI, NUE and PWR.
Did CRH outperform the S&P 500?
CRH finished ahead of the S&P 500 (SPY) in 14 of 29 full calendar years. In 2025, it returned +36.9%, against +17.7% for the index.
How did CRH do in stock market crashes?
CRH fell less than the S&P 500 (SPY) in two of the ten major crashes it has traded through, and further in eight. The clearest case was the Covid crash, when CRH fell 49.8% and the S&P 500 fell 33.7%.
What diversifies CRH?
These had a low correlation with CRH over the past 5 years and still earned a positive 5-year return: among large ETFs, DXJ (correlation 0.35), EMLP (correlation 0.47) and SMH (correlation 0.49); among large stocks, CAH (correlation 0.23), CLS (correlation 0.40) and FIX (correlation 0.48). A correlation near zero means the two have moved largely independently.
How we measure
- Short-term periods are 1M, 3M, 6M, YTD, 1Y; long-term periods are 3Y, 5Y, 10Y. An investment outperformed in a period when its total return, with dividends reinvested, was higher than CRH's. Returns within 0.5 points or 3% of CRH's, whichever is larger, count as a tie.
- "Qualified" means outperforming in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods. "All-weather" means outperforming in every long-term period and all but one short-term period.
- Popular alternatives are the funds and stocks most often compared with this one. We include only those that trade today, are not leveraged or inverse, and hold at least $200 million.
- Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily returns over 5 years, a measure of how much the price typically swings in a year. The Sharpe ratio is the return above cash for each unit of that volatility.
- A decline, or drawdown, runs from a peak to the lowest close before the next high. The worst decline ever uses all the price history we have; comparisons between funds use the past 10 years so that younger funds are judged on the same stretch.
- Sector overlap is the share of assets two funds hold in the same sectors. Correlation and the mixed-portfolio figures use monthly returns.
- Upside and downside capture follow Morningstar's definition: the compound monthly return in the months the S&P 500 rose (or fell), divided by the S&P 500's compound return in those months. Beta measures how strongly monthly returns have moved with the S&P 500. All three use the same window for every investment.
- Figures are computed from daily adjusted prices and update after each trading day. Past performance does not predict future results.