Relative Intelligence · Payment Processing

How Block (XYZ) compares with the whole market and its popular alternatives
Built by QuantCommons' quantitative engine, this page is about relative opportunity, not data on XYZ alone. It places XYZ (Block, Inc.) against 20+ popular alternatives, its neighboring categories and the entire market of over 10,000 U.S.-listed stocks and ETFs, and surfaces what has done better on consistent outperformance, return for the risk taken, behavior in real market crashes and diversification. The result is a clearer view of where XYZ stands in the market, and of the alternatives worth a closer look.
Period covered: XYZ's full trading record, from November 2015 through September 2026. The crash tests reach back to 2000 using older funds and the S&P 500. All returns include reinvested dividends. Data as of October 20, 2026.
Data as of October 20, 2026. Full tables and charts read best on a larger screen.
On this page12 sections
Key findings
- Right nowThe slide is XYZ's own: it is 72.3% below its high, against 1.3% for the S&P 500. Its payment processing peers split over the past 3 months: SHOP (Shopify) rose 39.4%, while FOUR (Shift4 Payments) fell 20.5%. Consistency ↓
- Stock or market?The weakness is XYZ's own: it fell 1.5% over the past 3 months while the technology sector ETF XLK (State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF) rose 5.7%. The S&P 500 rose 3.9%. Its payment processing peers did not move as one over the past 3 months: SHOP (Shopify) rose 39.4%, while FOUR (Shift4 Payments) fell 20.5%.
- Past 1 to 3 yearsXYZ has trailed the market, rising 2.1% over the past year against 15.8% for the S&P 500 and 17.9% for the Nasdaq 100. The same gap shows up over 3 years (77.6% against 89.3%). The last two calendar years both went the same way: XYZ fell 23.4% in 2025, against 15.8% for the S&P 500 and 17.9% for the Nasdaq 100. By year ↓
- Long termOver the past decade, XYZ returned 21.5% a year against 15.5% a year for the S&P 500 (598% in total against 321%). On the flip side, over 5 years XYZ trailed the index: 69.4% against 81.7%. Growth of $10,000 ↓
- In a crashThe 2022 bear market took 65.8% off XYZ, against 24.5% for the S&P 500. That was more than V (Visa, 24.1%) but less than SHOP (Shopify, 79.0%). XYZ fell further than the S&P 500 in four of the last four sell-offs, including the 2022 bear market (65.8% against 24.5%). Crash tests ↓
- DiversificationAgainst the S&P 500, XYZ has a correlation of 0.71 over 5 years, more closely than 99% of stocks worth at least $300 million. Next to an index fund it is more of the same, not a cushion. Over 10 years, XYZ's beta versus the S&P 500 was 2.52: in the S&P 500's rising months it gained 2.1 times as much as the index, and in falling months it lost 2.7 times as much. Market capture ↓
- Better options
- Nearby categories and themes
- AAPL (Apple, digital payments theme) and MSFT (Microsoft, software) earned more than XYZ with less volatility over the past 5 years. AAPL returned 18.5% a year at 28.0% volatility, against a loss of 21.1% a year at 59.9%.
- Versus the S&P 500
- Simply owning the S&P 500 would have done better over the past 5 years: 12.7% a year at 17.1% volatility, against 21.1% at 59.9% for XYZ.
- Whole market
- 2,981 of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than XYZ with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them NVDA (NVIDIA), AAPL (Apple) and GOOG (Alphabet).
How much would $10,000 in XYZ have grown?
This chart tracks a hypothetical $10,000 investment in XYZ over the past 10 years, with dividends reinvested, alongside the same amount in the S&P 500, investments that ended ahead of XYZ over the same span and XYZ's popular alternatives, among those that traded for the entire period. A second view covers the past 5 years, the period the better options further down the page are judged on. It shows not only where each investment ended up but also how smooth or uneven the path was.
Note: XYZ began trading on November 19, 2015, so the chart cannot reach back to the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or two other sell-offs. It covers the most recent 10 years of XYZ's record, starting at the end of September 2016.
- $10,000 invested in XYZ at the end of September 2016 would have grown to $63,061 by September 2026, more than the $41,286 it would have become in SPY, an S&P 500 fund.
- Five of the eight other investments on the chart ended ahead of XYZ, and SHOP finished highest, at $345,690.
Choose a period
From the end of September 2016 to the end of September 2026. The scale is logarithmic, so equal steps up the chart are equal percentage gains. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 272 of the 2,697 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of XYZ; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- SHOP$345,690+3,357% total · +42.5% a year
- FTNT$241,889+2,319% total · +37.5% a year
- PANW$149,644+1,396% total · +31.1% a year
- AAPL$128,826+1,188% total · +29.1% a year
- MSFT$100,294+903% total · +25.9% a year
- XYZ$63,061+531% total · +20.2% a year
- MA$57,471+475% total · +19.1% a year
- V$46,623+366% total · +16.6% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$41,286+313% total · +15.2% a year
- WEX$15,607+56.1% total · +4.6% a year
From the end of September 2021 to the end of September 2026. The scale is logarithmic, so equal steps up the chart are equal percentage gains. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 3,431 of the 3,628 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of XYZ; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- SPY (S&P 500)$19,000+90.0% total · +13.7% a year
- V$16,755+67.5% total · +10.9% a year
- MA$16,338+63.4% total · +10.3% a year
- PAY$12,435+24.4% total · +4.5% a year
- SHOP$10,938+9.4% total · +1.8% a year
- WEX$9,578−4.2% total · −0.9% a year
- COIN$8,195−18.1% total · −3.9% a year
- AFRM$5,811−41.9% total · −10.3% a year
- TOST$5,804−42.0% total · −10.3% a year
- XYZ$3,066−69.3% total · −21.1% a year
XYZ at a glance
This section summarizes the key facts about the stock, its returns over periods from one to ten years and the risk it has carried, with dividends reinvested throughout. These figures serve as the baseline for every comparison that follows.
Note: XYZ began trading on November 19, 2015, so every figure here, including its worst decline, covers only the time since then. None of them reflect the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or two other sell-offs.
- XYZ is still 72.3% below its all-time high.
- XYZ's deepest decline since it began trading in 2015 was 86.1%, from August 2021 to October 2023. It has not yet climbed back to that peak.
- Over ten full calendar years, XYZ's best was 2020, when it returned 248%, and its worst was 2022, when it lost 61.1%. It lost money in three of those years.
The company
- Market value
- $47B
- Industry
- Software - Infrastructure
- Price history from
- November 2015
Returns
- Past 1 year
- +2.1%total return
- Past 3 years
- +77.6%+21.1% a year
- Past 5 years
- −69.4%−21.1% a year
- Past 10 years
- +598%+21.5% a year
- Best calendar year
- +248%2020
- Worst calendar year
- −61.1%2022
- Losing years
- 3 of 10full calendar years
Risk
- Volatility
- 59.9%typical yearly swing, 5 years
- Sharpe ratio
- -0.10return per unit of risk, 5 years
- Worst decline ever
- −86.1%Aug 2021 to Oct 2023
- From its all-time high
- −72.3%below the peak
XYZ against the whole market
Where XYZ ranks among every stock and fund, and what across the market has done better.
How does XYZ rank among all stocks?
This section ranks XYZ on return, volatility, risk-adjusted return and worst decline against every stock worth at least $300 million with enough history. Where the comparisons with its popular alternatives show how XYZ stacks up against its peers, these rankings show where it stands in the market as a whole.
- XYZ's 5-year return ranks in the bottom 9% of the 2,893 stocks worth at least $300 million with 5 years of history.
- XYZ's 10-year return ranks in the top 11% of the 2,202 stocks worth at least $300 million with 10 years of history.
Ranked against U.S.-listed stocks worth at least $300M that have enough history for each measure, so the count changes from row to row; smaller stocks are left out. Lower volatility and smaller declines rank higher.
| Measure | XYZ | Rank | Standing |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +2.1% | 1,905 of 3,287 | bottom 43% |
| 3-year return | +77.6% | 1,156 of 3,017 | top 38% |
| 5-year return | −69.4% | 2,626 of 2,893 | bottom 10% |
| 10-year return | +598% | 235 of 2,202 | top 11% |
| Volatility, 5 years | 59.9% | 2,272 of 2,893 | bottom 22% |
| Sharpe ratio, 5 years | -0.10 | 2,545 of 2,893 | bottom 13% |
| Worst decline, past 10 years | −86.1% | 1,815 of 2,187 | bottom 18% |
What has beaten XYZ on both return and risk?
Each dot is an investment, placed by how much it earned a year over the past 5 years (higher is better) and how much its price swung, its volatility (further left is calmer). XYZ sits where the dashed lines cross. Anything in the green box above and to the left earned more than XYZ with smaller swings, a better trade-off over this period on both counts. Past results are no promise, but a name in the box is worth a closer look.
- 1,977 stocks and 1,004 ETFs worth at least $500 million sit in the green region: each earned more than XYZ over the past 5 years with smaller price swings. That is 82% of the 3,633 screened.
- Among those with at least half XYZ's swings, FIX has the best return for its risk: 77.0% a year at 46.7% volatility, 22% less than XYZ's 59.9%, and a Sharpe ratio (return above cash per unit of volatility) of 1.46 against -0.10 for XYZ. BELFB earned the most, 78.0% a year, while still swinging less than XYZ (52.1% against 59.9%).
- Among XYZ's popular alternatives, V, MA and PAYO are in the region. V earned 12.8% a year against a loss of 21.1% a year for XYZ, at 22.9% volatility, 62% less than XYZ's 59.9%.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested, and volatility the annualized swing in daily prices, both over 5 years. Labeled dots are the strongest picks from the table below and the names called out above, colored by how close they sit to XYZ; faint dots are 89 more of the 2,981 in the green region (the strongest, one per fund family). 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million were screened. Hover over a dot for its figures.
- Popular alternatives
- Same and neighboring categories, and shared themes
- The whole market
- Others in the green region
Is there a better investment than XYZ?
Investments that beat XYZ over the past 5 years on return, volatility, drawdowns, consistency, crash losses or fees, from its popular alternatives out to the whole market.
- Among XYZ's popular alternatives, V, MA and WEX earned more than XYZ with less volatility over the past 5 years. V returned 12.8% a year at 22.9% volatility, against a loss of 21.1% a year at 59.9%.
- Looking beyond its popular alternatives, AAPL (digital payments theme) and MSFT (software) earned more than XYZ with less volatility over the past 5 years. AAPL returned 18.5% a year at 28.0% volatility, against a loss of 21.1% a year at 59.9%.
- Simply owning the S&P 500 would have done better over the past 5 years: 12.7% a year at 17.1% volatility, against 21.1% at 59.9% for XYZ.
How this works
The table below lists investments that beat XYZ over the past 5 years on at least one of these measures: a higher annual return with lower volatility, a higher annual return at similar volatility, a similar return with lower volatility, a higher Sharpe ratio with a smaller worst decline, a higher total return in most periods from 3 months to 10 years, or smaller losses in recent market crashes. It checks XYZ's popular alternatives first, then the rest of its own and neighboring categories, then every stock and fund worth at least $500 million, and shows the strongest few in each group. The full list of those with a higher return and lower volatility than XYZ follows the table.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested. Annual return, volatility and the Sharpe ratio cover 5 years; the worst decline covers the past 10 years. Green marks a better figure than XYZ's. "On the frontier" means no other option shown or tested earned more with less volatility. Funds that hold the same thing are shown once. Beyond the popular alternatives, nothing with more than 1.5× XYZ's volatility counts as better.
These figures cover the past 5 years. Green marks a better figure than XYZ's.
| Investment | Why it is better | Past 5 years | Downside | Long run | Fit | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Annual return?higher is better | Volatility?lower is calmer | Sharpe?return per unit of risk | Worst decline?past 10 years | 10Y returntotal | Corr. with XYZ?lower diversifies more | Expenseper year | |||
| −21.1% | 59.9% | -0.10 | −86.1% | +598% | 1.00 | — | |||
| +12.7% | 17.1% | 0.79 | −33.7% | +321% | 0.71 | 0.09% | |||
| Popular alternativesbest 6 shownThe investments people most often weigh against XYZ. 16 of 22 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
TOSTToast, Inc. · Application Software | Higher return, similar volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | −8.5% | 59.9% | 0.15 | −80.6% | — | 0.57 | — | |
PAYPaymentus Holdings, Inc. · Software | Higher return, similar volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +6.2% | 64.4% | 0.41 | −80.8% | — | 0.33 | — | |
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +12.8% | 22.9% | 0.64 | −36.4% | +429% | 0.43 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +12.4% | 23.8% | 0.61 | −41.0% | +541% | 0.39 | — | ||
WEXWEX Inc. · Payment Processing | Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | −0.8% | 37.2% | 0.17 | −64.6% | +74.9% | 0.38 | — | |
FOURShift4 Payments, Inc. · Payment Processing | Higher return, similar volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | −12.1% | 58.2% | 0.07 | −71.7% | — | 0.57 | — | |
| Same and neighboring categories, and shared themesbest 6 shownEverything else in Payment Processing and the categories next to it (Application Software, Software, Consumer Finance, Financial Technology), plus XYZ's specific themes. 82 of 93 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +18.5% | 28.0% | 0.75 | −38.5% | +1,168% | 0.39 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +12.5% | 28.2% | 0.56 | −37.1% | +946% | 0.42 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +31.9% | 43.4% | 0.86 | −48.0% | +1,274% | 0.29 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +20.7% | 44.8% | 0.65 | −38.3% | +2,626% | 0.29 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +1.9% | 45.5% | 0.27 | −64.5% | +848% | 0.38 | — | ||
| Higher return, similar volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +10.1% | 59.7% | 0.45 | −68.1% | — | 0.49 | — | ||
| The whole marketbest 8 shownEvery other stock and fund worth at least $500 million. 3,149 of 3,518 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +31.5% | 38.5% | 0.91 | −56.6% | +1,505% | 0.46 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +40.7% | 32.8% | 1.21 | −34.5% | +1,807% | -0.05 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +26.1% | 23.4% | 1.11 | −45.1% | +603% | -0.02 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +55.2% | 54.4% | 1.08 | −59.6% | +3,701% | 0.22 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +18.4% | 26.0% | 0.78 | −35.1% | +779% | 0.63 | 0.09% | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +33.4% | 36.9% | 0.97 | −45.3% | +1,665% | 0.54 | 0.35% | ||
| Higher return, similar volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +68.1% | 57.1% | 1.20 | −57.6% | +5,243% | 0.26 | — | ||
CTVACorteva, Inc. · Chemicals | Similar return, lower volatility | −21.0% | 47.6% | 0.04 | −87.1% | — | 0.21 | — | |
What these numbers mean for XYZ
- Annual return
- XYZ lost 21.1% a year over the past 5 years with dividends reinvested, against 12.7% a year for the S&P 500. At that pace, $10,000 became about $3,060. Annual return is the steady yearly rate that would produce the same total result, so investments held over the same span compare fairly. Guide: What is performance and return? →
- Volatility
- XYZ's volatility over the past 5 years was 59.9%, 3.5 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, XYZ's return lands within 59.9% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump. Guide: Understanding and measuring risk (volatility) →
- Sharpe ratio
- XYZ's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was -0.10, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so XYZ earned less for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings. Guide: Balancing reward with risk (Sharpe ratio) →
- Worst decline
- XYZ's worst fall from a peak to a low over the past 10 years was 86.1%, against 33.7% for the S&P 500. Losses and gains are not symmetric: climbing back from a 86.1% fall takes a 618% gain. Guide: Market crash risk and tail risk →
- Correlation
- Over the past 5 years, XYZ's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.71 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They often move together: some diversification next to an index fund, but not a cushion. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against XYZ instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a XYZ holding. Guide: Correlation and diversification →
Show all 2,981 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that earned more than XYZ with less volatility
Out of 3,633 tested over 5 years. The strongest 100 are listed, best first, with funds that hold the same thing listed once.
| # | Investment | Found in | Annual return | Volatility | Sharpe | Worst decline | 10Y return | Corr. with XYZ | Expense |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Whole market | +31.5% | 38.5% | 0.91 | −56.6% | +1,505% | 0.46 | — | |
| 2 | Whole market | +40.7% | 32.8% | 1.21 | −34.5% | +1,807% | -0.05 | — | |
| 3 | Whole market | +26.1% | 23.4% | 1.11 | −45.1% | +603% | -0.02 | — | |
| 4 | Whole market | +55.2% | 54.4% | 1.08 | −59.6% | +3,701% | 0.22 | — | |
| 5 | Whole market | +17.4% | 22.9% | 0.82 | −31.4% | +685% | 0.42 | — | |
| 6 | Whole market | +17.4% | 43.4% | 0.59 | −56.9% | +1,628% | 0.41 | — | |
| 7 | Whole market | +49.0% | 49.0% | 1.06 | −52.2% | +3,439% | 0.34 | — | |
| 8 | Whole market | +38.7% | 25.0% | 1.44 | −38.1% | +586% | 0.00 | — | |
| 9 | Whole market | +33.8% | 32.2% | 1.07 | −37.5% | +965% | 0.52 | — | |
| 10 | Whole market | +57.4% | 48.7% | 1.18 | −57.0% | +2,698% | 0.31 | — | |
| 11 | Whole market | +32.0% | 40.7% | 0.89 | −55.3% | +1,017% | 0.33 | — | |
| 12 | Whole market | +18.4% | 26.0% | 0.78 | −35.1% | +779% | 0.63 | 0.09% | |
| 13 | Whole market | +19.5% | 34.1% | 0.69 | −33.6% | +652% | 0.42 | — | |
| 14 | Whole market | +48.8% | 43.0% | 1.15 | −52.5% | +967% | 0.41 | — | |
| 15 | Whole market | +21.3% | 25.6% | 0.89 | −30.3% | +816% | -0.07 | — | |
| 16 | Whole market | +14.4% | 29.9% | 0.60 | −37.9% | +755% | 0.38 | — | |
| 17 | Whole market | +26.3% | 24.9% | 1.07 | −41.6% | +654% | 0.44 | — | |
| 18 | Whole market | +21.0% | 26.8% | 0.85 | −50.8% | +694% | 0.57 | — | |
| 19 | Whole market | +33.4% | 36.9% | 0.97 | −45.3% | +1,665% | 0.54 | 0.35% | |
| 20 | Whole market | +16.5% | 23.1% | 0.78 | −48.4% | +808% | 0.43 | — | |
| 21 | Whole market | +17.3% | 18.2% | 0.97 | −40.0% | +352% | 0.52 | — | |
| 22 | Whole market | +51.2% | 33.4% | 1.41 | −79.7% | +1,387% | 0.17 | — | |
| 23 | Whole market | +51.8% | 37.5% | 1.31 | −71.7% | +768% | 0.12 | — | |
| 24 | Whole market | +58.0% | 51.9% | 1.14 | −66.3% | +13,019% | 0.49 | — | |
| 25 | Whole market | +14.8% | 23.6% | 0.71 | −32.8% | +625% | 0.46 | — | |
| 26 | Same or nearby category | +18.5% | 28.0% | 0.75 | −38.5% | +1,168% | 0.39 | — | |
| 27 | Whole market | +40.4% | 49.9% | 0.93 | −66.3% | +681% | 0.17 | — | |
| 28 | Whole market | +13.3% | 30.0% | 0.57 | −39.2% | +711% | 0.45 | — | |
| 29 | Whole market | +37.3% | 55.0% | 0.85 | −69.4% | +899% | 0.30 | — | |
| 30 | STLDSteel Dynamics, Inc. · Metals & Mining | Whole market | +32.2% | 38.0% | 0.93 | −68.5% | +1,018% | 0.51 | — |
| 31 | Whole market | +24.0% | 54.3% | 0.67 | −59.1% | +1,565% | 0.41 | — | |
| 32 | Same or nearby category | +12.5% | 28.2% | 0.56 | −37.1% | +946% | 0.42 | — | |
| 33 | Whole market | +14.8% | 31.6% | 0.59 | −54.6% | +670% | 0.47 | — | |
| 34 | Whole market | +42.1% | 24.7% | 1.55 | −46.1% | +349% | 0.24 | — | |
| 35 | Whole market | +13.9% | 34.5% | 0.55 | −42.6% | +923% | 0.48 | — | |
| 36 | Whole market | +19.9% | 43.2% | 0.63 | −54.3% | +1,610% | 0.22 | — | |
| 37 | Whole market | +20.9% | 35.3% | 0.71 | −58.1% | +691% | 0.47 | — | |
| 38 | RSReliance Steel & Aluminum Co. · Metals & Mining | Whole market | +24.8% | 28.1% | 0.93 | −40.8% | +626% | 0.44 | — |
| 39 | COKECoca-Cola Consolidated, Inc. · Food & Beverages | Whole market | +41.2% | 38.0% | 1.10 | −51.7% | +1,569% | 0.08 | — |
| 40 | Whole market | +23.5% | 18.8% | 1.22 | −75.2% | +350% | 0.34 | — | |
| 41 | Same or nearby category | +31.9% | 43.4% | 0.86 | −48.0% | +1,274% | 0.29 | — | |
| 42 | FROFrontline Plc · Oil & Gas | Whole market | +52.6% | 49.7% | 1.10 | −52.0% | +1,194% | 0.07 | — |
| 43 | FCNCAFirst Citizens BancShares, Inc. · Regional Banks | Whole market | +20.4% | 41.4% | 0.64 | −47.5% | +662% | 0.24 | — |
| 44 | Whole market | +0.6% | 54.5% | 0.28 | −70.0% | +1,066% | 0.23 | — | |
| 45 | AITApplied Industrial Technologies, Inc. · Industrial Distribution | Whole market | +28.5% | 30.3% | 0.98 | −59.3% | +742% | 0.45 | — |
| 46 | MEDPMedpace Holdings, Inc. · Contract Research | Whole market | +27.0% | 52.0% | 0.70 | −42.9% | +1,914% | 0.39 | — |
| 47 | Whole market | +11.5% | 17.5% | 0.71 | −35.0% | +302% | 0.74 | 0.03% | |
| 48 | HALOHalozyme Therapeutics, Inc. · Biotechnology | Whole market | +26.6% | 40.4% | 0.79 | −49.1% | +1,196% | 0.26 | — |
| 49 | Whole market | +12.8% | 16.9% | 0.80 | −34.0% | +324% | 0.71 | 0.03% | |
| 50 | MUSAMurphy USA Inc. · Convenience Stores | Whole market | +26.1% | 31.2% | 0.90 | −35.5% | +706% | 0.03 | — |
| 51 | Whole market | +9.0% | 36.6% | 0.42 | −56.1% | +548% | 0.60 | — | |
| 52 | ENTGEntegris, Inc. · Semiconductor Equipment | Whole market | +2.2% | 55.4% | 0.32 | −59.3% | +823% | 0.42 | — |
| 53 | Same or nearby category | +20.7% | 44.8% | 0.65 | −38.3% | +2,626% | 0.29 | — | |
| 54 | Whole market | +20.8% | 22.6% | 0.96 | −25.7% | +508% | 0.24 | — | |
| 55 | MATXMatson, Inc. · Freight & Logistics | Whole market | +24.9% | 39.4% | 0.76 | −53.6% | +594% | 0.37 | — |
| 56 | LNTHLantheus Holdings, Inc. · Pharmaceuticals | Whole market | +34.0% | 56.6% | 0.80 | −68.5% | +985% | 0.09 | — |
| 57 | Whole market | +17.3% | 24.3% | 0.78 | −43.6% | +537% | 0.63 | — | |
| 58 | GFFGriffon Corporation · Building Products | Whole market | +36.4% | 41.7% | 0.95 | −61.3% | +761% | 0.41 | — |
| 59 | DHTDHT Holdings, Inc. · Marine Shipping | Whole market | +38.7% | 39.0% | 1.04 | −39.7% | +1,050% | 0.06 | — |
| 60 | Same or nearby category | +1.9% | 45.5% | 0.27 | −64.5% | +848% | 0.38 | — | |
| 61 | MTRNMaterion Corporation · Specialty Materials | Whole market | +27.9% | 46.1% | 0.76 | −62.0% | +764% | 0.38 | — |
| 62 | LPGDorian LPG Ltd. · Oil & Gas Midstream | Whole market | +54.6% | 43.6% | 1.22 | −62.9% | +1,821% | 0.30 | — |
| 63 | Whole market | +12.7% | 17.9% | 0.76 | −27.4% | +196% | 0.00 | — | |
| 64 | DXJWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund · International Equity | Whole market | +26.6% | 19.1% | 1.34 | −39.1% | +428% | 0.33 | 0.48% |
| 65 | LVHIFranklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +17.0% | 11.1% | 1.48 | −32.4% | +194% | 0.41 | 0.40% |
| 66 | CSWCSW Industrials, Inc. · Industrial Products | Whole market | +17.1% | 34.4% | 0.63 | −46.2% | +867% | 0.45 | — |
| 67 | Whole market | +14.7% | 16.8% | 0.91 | −37.0% | +204% | 0.06 | — | |
| 68 | Whole market | +14.5% | 23.0% | 0.71 | −35.1% | +553% | 0.65 | 0.18% | |
| 69 | Whole market | +33.2% | 29.4% | 1.13 | −54.9% | +483% | 0.24 | — | |
| 70 | Whole market | +21.0% | 23.4% | 0.94 | −42.9% | +242% | 0.03 | — | |
| 71 | Whole market | +16.8% | 26.1% | 0.73 | −42.0% | +374% | 0.26 | — | |
| 72 | Same or nearby category | −0.1% | 39.6% | 0.19 | −55.7% | +715% | 0.28 | — | |
| 73 | UFPTUFP Technologies, Inc. · Medical - Devices | Whole market | +35.8% | 46.0% | 0.90 | −48.3% | +1,006% | 0.21 | — |
| 74 | Whole market | +50.3% | 37.5% | 1.28 | −75.3% | +674% | 0.07 | — | |
| 75 | SIISprott Inc. · Asset Management | Whole market | +24.9% | 39.2% | 0.76 | −49.2% | +786% | 0.29 | — |
| 76 | NRPNatural Resource Partners L.P. · Coal | Whole market | +37.4% | 33.9% | 1.11 | −78.8% | +632% | 0.19 | — |
| 77 | INSWInternational Seaways, Inc. · Oil & Gas | Whole market | +56.5% | 40.5% | 1.31 | −57.4% | — | 0.02 | — |
| 78 | CWSTCasella Waste Systems, Inc. · Environmental Services | Whole market | +2.8% | 28.1% | 0.24 | −37.7% | +740% | 0.29 | — |
| 79 | PLPCPreformed Line Products Company · Electrical Equipment & Parts | Whole market | +40.5% | 48.3% | 0.94 | −59.5% | +827% | 0.18 | — |
| 80 | SBLKStar Bulk Carriers Corp. · Marine Shipping | Whole market | +16.5% | 41.3% | 0.58 | −73.8% | +1,037% | 0.26 | — |
| 81 | Whole market | +12.4% | 55.6% | 0.49 | −70.8% | +219% | 0.23 | — | |
| 82 | XSDState Street SPDR S&P Semiconductor ETF · Technology | Whole market | +18.3% | 40.8% | 0.62 | −42.3% | +857% | 0.59 | 0.35% |
| 83 | Whole market | +26.0% | 23.8% | 1.09 | −63.3% | +379% | 0.32 | — | |
| 84 | Whole market | +18.6% | 24.3% | 0.83 | −52.0% | +317% | 0.09 | — | |
| 85 | PBTPermian Basin Royalty Trust · Oil & Gas Midstream | Whole market | +37.8% | 47.2% | 0.92 | −74.0% | +717% | -0.01 | — |
| 86 | Whole market | +38.7% | 33.3% | 1.16 | −69.6% | +542% | 0.32 | — | |
| 87 | Whole market | +22.8% | 24.9% | 0.95 | −30.5% | +200% | -0.05 | — | |
| 88 | Whole market | +44.2% | 36.9% | 1.18 | −71.9% | +1,061% | 0.17 | — | |
| 89 | Whole market | +9.3% | 16.9% | 0.61 | −35.8% | +153% | 0.60 | 0.03% | |
| 90 | APPFAppFolio Inc. · Application Software | Same or nearby category | +11.3% | 44.2% | 0.46 | −55.4% | +1,072% | 0.28 | — |
| 91 | Whole market | +15.8% | 20.0% | 0.84 | −42.0% | +310% | 0.46 | — | |
| 92 | ARCBArcBest Corp · Trucking | Whole market | +9.3% | 49.5% | 0.43 | −67.8% | +633% | 0.49 | — |
| 93 | HCIHCI Group, Inc. · Insurance - Property & Casualty | Whole market | +11.7% | 42.0% | 0.47 | −78.8% | +829% | 0.55 | — |
| 94 | Whole market | +33.6% | 30.6% | 1.10 | −45.7% | +345% | 0.27 | — | |
| 95 | Whole market | +33.2% | 32.9% | 1.04 | −64.2% | +430% | 0.22 | — | |
| 96 | Whole market | +25.4% | 30.4% | 0.90 | −59.8% | +374% | 0.46 | — | |
| 97 | NWPXNWPX Infrastructure, Inc. · Construction Materials | Whole market | +32.5% | 36.2% | 0.96 | −46.5% | +682% | 0.31 | — |
| 98 | FTXLFirst Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF · Technology | Whole market | +27.4% | 38.8% | 0.82 | −43.9% | +1,077% | 0.50 | 0.60% |
| 99 | Whole market | +33.7% | 29.4% | 1.14 | −47.6% | +474% | 0.17 | — | |
| 100 | Whole market | +27.4% | 28.8% | 0.99 | −54.7% | +789% | 0.60 | — |
XYZ against its popular alternatives
The investments people most often weigh against XYZ, compared period by period and year by year.
How do XYZ's risk and return compare with its alternatives?
This map plots each investment's annual return over the past 5 years against its volatility, the size of its typical price swings. Investments toward the upper left earned more for a smoother ride, and those toward the lower right earned less for a rougher one. The dashed lines cross at XYZ, which divides the map into what did better or worse on each measure.
- 11 of the 22 popular alternatives, led by V, MA and WEX, were both more rewarding and calmer than XYZ over the past 5 years, earning a higher annual return with lower volatility.
- Over the past 5 years, XYZ returned -21.1% a year, less than the S&P 500's 12.7%, with higher volatility (59.9% against 17.1%).
Green points earned more than XYZ with less volatility; red points earned less with more. Hover over a point for its figures. Total returns with dividends reinvested, annualized.
All figures
| Investment | Annual return | Volatility |
|---|---|---|
| HOOD Robinhood Markets, Inc. | +18.6% | 68.6% |
| V Visa Inc. | +12.8% | 22.9% |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | +12.7% | 17.1% |
| MA Mastercard Incorporated | +12.4% | 23.8% |
| PAY Paymentus Holdings, Inc. | +6.2% | 64.4% |
| SHOP Shopify Inc. | +3.1% | 66.9% |
| WEX WEX Inc. | −0.8% | 37.2% |
| PAYO Payoneer Global Inc. | −2.9% | 55.1% |
| RELY Remitly Global, Inc. | −6.6% | 57.8% |
| SOFI SoFi Technologies, Inc. | −7.0% | 65.7% |
| TOST Toast, Inc. | −8.5% | 59.9% |
| INTU Intuit Inc. | −9.4% | 39.1% |
| GPN Global Payments Inc. | −11.2% | 36.9% |
| COIN Coinbase Global, Inc. | −11.5% | 86.9% |
| FOUR Shift4 Payments, Inc. | −12.1% | 58.2% |
| EEFT Euronet Worldwide, Inc. | −12.9% | 35.7% |
| AFRM Affirm Holdings, Inc. | −12.9% | 91.6% |
| FISV Fiserv, Inc. | −15.2% | 36.7% |
| STNE StoneCo Ltd. | −18.0% | 65.1% |
| FIS Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. | −19.7% | 33.9% |
| PAGS PagSeguro Digital Ltd. | −19.8% | 60.6% |
| DLO Dlocal Limited | −21.1% | 70.3% |
| XYZ This pageBlock, Inc. | −21.1% | 59.9% |
| PYPL PayPal Holdings, Inc. | −25.9% | 43.3% |
Has XYZ consistently beaten its popular alternatives?
This section compares XYZ with the investments people most often weigh against it, checking each one over eight periods from one month to ten years. Counting how often an alternative earned more than XYZ helps separate lasting outperformance from a single strong stretch.
- Three of the 23 popular alternatives, SHOP, PAY and TOST, outperformed XYZ in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes.
- SHOP outperformed XYZ in every long-term period and in all but one short-term period, the most consistent record in the group.
- V, MA and PAY earned more for the risk they took than XYZ (a higher Sharpe ratio) and fell less in their worst decline of the past 10 years.
A green cell means the alternative earned more than XYZ over that period. "Qualified" marks those that did so in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods.
| Investment | Periods outperformed | Short term | Long term | Risk · 5 years | Fund | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1M | 3M | 6M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | 10Y | Volatilitylower is calmer | Sharpehigher is better | Worst declinepast 10 years | Expense | Assets | Overlapsame sectors | ||
| XYZ Block, Inc. (this page) | — | +0.3% | −1.5% | +5.7% | +19.9% | +2.1% | +77.6% | −69.4% | +598% | 59.9% | -0.10 | −86.1% | — | $47B | — |
| SHOP QualifiedShopify Inc. | 4/5 short3/3 longAll-weather | +25.8% | +39.4% | +28.4% | +10.4% | +5.3% | +239% | +16.6% | +3,916% | 66.9% | 0.38 | −84.8% | — | $225B | — |
| PAY QualifiedPaymentus Holdings, Inc. | 3/5 short2/3 long | −4.5% | +11.1% | +13.8% | +15.8% | +12.0% | +122% | +35.0% | — | 64.4% | 0.41 | −80.8% | — | $4.2B | — |
| TOST QualifiedToast, Inc. | 3/5 short2/3 long | +9.6% | +5.8% | +11.9% | −4.0% | −13.3% | +85.7% | −35.9% | — | 59.9% | 0.15 | −80.6% | — | $17B | — |
| AFRM Financial - Credit ServicesAffirm Holdings, Inc. | 2/5 short2/3 long | +3.9% | −2.0% | +10.1% | −0.2% | +2.5% | +305% | −50.0% | — | 91.6% | 0.30 | −94.7% | — | $22B | — |
| COIN Financial - Data & Stock ExchangesCoinbase Global, Inc. | 1/5 short2/3 long | −15.0% | +6.5% | −19.3% | −27.8% | −50.3% | +129% | −45.7% | — | 86.9% | 0.29 | −90.9% | — | $45B | — |
| HOOD Financial - Capital MarketsRobinhood Markets, Inc. | 1/5 short2/3 long | −20.3% | −1.1% | +7.6% | −14.8% | −27.7% | +976% | +135% | — | 68.6% | 0.59 | −90.2% | — | $78B | — |
| SOFI Financial - Credit ServicesSoFi Technologies, Inc. | 0/5 short2/3 long | −13.5% | −13.7% | −24.7% | −46.5% | −48.8% | +99.2% | −30.3% | — | 65.7% | 0.21 | −83.3% | — | $19B | — |
| PAGS Specialty Business ServicesPagSeguro Digital Ltd. | 5/5 short1/3 long | +23.8% | +29.9% | +9.2% | +29.2% | +38.4% | +73.1% | −66.9% | — | 60.6% | -0.07 | −90.0% | — | $3.2B | — |
| RELY Software - InfrastructureRemitly Global, Inc. | 5/5 short1/3 long | +13.5% | +2.7% | +18.8% | +85.4% | +52.9% | −6.6% | −28.9% | — | 57.8% | 0.17 | −85.8% | — | $5.2B | — |
| MA Financial - Credit ServicesMastercard Incorporated | 4/5 short1/3 long | +9.5% | +13.5% | +20.5% | +10.9% | +10.3% | +64.3% | +79.2% | +541% | 23.8% | 0.61 | −41.0% | — | $543B | — |
| V Financial - Credit ServicesVisa Inc. | 4/5 short1/3 long | +9.9% | +13.0% | +30.0% | +18.0% | +19.0% | +78.2% | +82.5% | +429% | 22.9% | 0.64 | −36.4% | — | $759B | — |
| PAYO Software - InfrastructurePayoneer Global Inc. | 4/5 short1/3 long | +0.3% | 0.0% | +37.1% | +31.1% | +19.6% | +23.6% | −13.5% | — | 55.1% | 0.22 | −76.0% | — | $2.4B | — |
| WEX Software - InfrastructureWEX Inc. | 3/5 short1/3 long | −1.2% | +13.2% | +4.5% | +24.8% | +21.1% | −1.4% | −3.9% | +74.9% | 37.2% | 0.17 | −64.6% | — | $6.3B | — |
| INTU Software - ApplicationIntuit Inc. | 2/5 short1/3 long | +10.8% | +14.6% | −16.4% | −46.0% | −48.9% | −32.1% | −38.8% | +237% | 39.1% | -0.06 | −68.2% | — | $90B | — |
| GPN Financial - Credit ServicesGlobal Payments Inc. | 2/5 short1/3 long | −0.6% | +3.3% | +17.2% | +13.4% | −1.3% | −21.1% | −44.7% | +22.4% | 36.9% | -0.14 | −70.2% | — | $22B | — |
| STNE Software - InfrastructureStoneCo Ltd. | 2/5 short1/3 long | +24.3% | +8.5% | −5.1% | −0.6% | −21.7% | +46.8% | −63.0% | — | 65.1% | 0.02 | −92.3% | — | $2.8B | — |
| FISV Information Technology ServicesFiserv, Inc. | 1/5 short1/3 long | +3.8% | −6.6% | −24.8% | −26.4% | −61.1% | −56.3% | −56.2% | −2.7% | 36.7% | -0.24 | −81.3% | — | $26B | — |
| FIS Information Technology ServicesFidelity National Information Services, Inc. | 1/5 short1/3 long | +3.5% | −12.8% | −22.9% | −42.7% | −44.3% | −21.6% | −66.6% | −41.3% | 33.9% | -0.47 | −76.0% | — | $19B | — |
| FOUR Software - InfrastructureShift4 Payments, Inc. | 1/5 short1/3 long | +2.8% | −20.5% | −18.0% | −35.4% | −46.7% | −20.1% | −47.4% | — | 58.2% | 0.07 | −71.7% | — | $4.2B | — |
| EEFT Software - InfrastructureEuronet Worldwide, Inc. | 0/5 short1/3 long | +0.1% | −18.7% | −12.1% | −10.7% | −24.3% | −21.1% | −49.9% | −19.7% | 35.7% | -0.21 | −63.3% | — | $2.5B | — |
| PYPL Financial - Credit ServicesPayPal Holdings, Inc. | 3/5 short0/3 long | +8.6% | +0.8% | +11.7% | −0.9% | −16.5% | +8.2% | −77.6% | +44.1% | 43.3% | -0.47 | −87.3% | — | $49B | — |
| DLO Software - InfrastructureDlocal Limited | 3/5 short0/3 long | +6.1% | +3.2% | +14.1% | +9.7% | +2.5% | −10.3% | −69.4% | — | 70.3% | 0.04 | −90.0% | — | $4.5B | — |
| IBIT CryptoiShares Bitcoin Trust ETF | 2/5 short0/3 long | −4.7% | +26.6% | +8.0% | −8.3% | −25.8% | — | — | — | — | — | −53.3% | 0.25% | $65B | — |
How did XYZ do year by year?
This table shows each investment's total return in every full calendar year since 2016, along with where XYZ ranked among its popular alternatives each year. Annual results reveal how consistently each one kept pace with XYZ and how far its good and bad years diverged, detail that multiyear averages tend to smooth over.
Note: XYZ began trading on November 19, 2015, so the table starts with 2016, its first full calendar year, and cannot show how it fared during the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or two other sell-offs.
- XYZ finished ahead of the S&P 500 in three of its ten full calendar years, and behind it in each of the last five.
- Among its popular alternatives, SOFI came out ahead of XYZ most often, in four of the five years both traded.
- Ranked against its popular alternatives each year, XYZ finished in the top quarter in three of ten years and in the bottom quarter in one. In 2025, it ranked 17 of 24.
Newest year first. Green marks a year in which the fund came out ahead of XYZ; gray means the two finished within a fraction of a point. The rank row places XYZ among the alternatives that traded the full year; dark green is the top quarter and red the bottom quarter.
| Investment | Years ahead of XYZ | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| XYZ This pageBlock, Inc. | — | −23.4% | +9.9% | +23.1% | −61.1% | −25.8% | +248% | +11.5% | +61.8% | +154% | +4.1% |
| Rank among alternatives | Top quarter in 3 of 10 | 17 of 24 | 16 of 23 | 16 of 23 | 16 of 23 | 11 of 16 | 1 of 13 | 13 of 13 | 1 of 11 | 1 of 11 | 9 of 11 |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 7 of 10 | +17.7% | +24.9% | +26.2% | −18.2% | +28.7% | +18.3% | +31.2% | −4.6% | +21.7% | +12.0% |
| SHOP Shopify Inc. | 6 of 10 | +51.4% | +36.5% | +124% | −74.8% | +21.7% | +185% | +187% | +37.1% | +135% | +66.3% |
| PAY Paymentus Holdings, Inc. | 3 of 4 | −3.3% | +82.8% | +123% | −77.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| TOST Toast, Inc. | 3 of 4 | −2.6% | +99.6% | +1.3% | −48.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| AFRM Affirm Holdings, Inc. | 3 of 4 | +22.2% | +23.9% | +408% | −90.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| COIN Coinbase Global, Inc. | 3 of 4 | −8.9% | +42.8% | +391% | −86.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| HOOD Robinhood Markets, Inc. | 4 of 4 | +204% | +192% | +56.5% | −54.2% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| SOFI SoFi Technologies, Inc. | 4 of 5 | +70.0% | +54.8% | +116% | −70.8% | +27.1% | — | — | — | — | — |
| PAGS PagSeguro Digital Ltd. | 3 of 7 | +61.0% | −49.8% | +42.7% | −66.7% | −53.9% | +66.5% | +82.3% | — | — | — |
| RELY Remitly Global, Inc. | 3 of 4 | −38.9% | +16.2% | +69.6% | −44.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| MA Mastercard Incorporated | 6 of 10 | +9.0% | +24.2% | +23.4% | −2.7% | +1.2% | +20.2% | +59.2% | +25.3% | +47.7% | +6.9% |
| V Visa Inc. | 6 of 10 | +11.8% | +22.3% | +26.3% | −3.4% | −0.3% | +17.1% | +43.3% | +16.5% | +47.2% | +1.4% |
| PAYO Payoneer Global Inc. | 2 of 5 | −44.0% | +92.7% | −4.8% | −25.6% | −28.6% | — | — | — | — | — |
| WEX WEX Inc. | 4 of 10 | −15.0% | −9.9% | +18.9% | +16.6% | −31.0% | −2.8% | +49.5% | −0.8% | +26.6% | +26.2% |
| INTU Intuit Inc. | 6 of 10 | +6.1% | +1.2% | +61.8% | −39.1% | +70.3% | +46.1% | +34.1% | +25.9% | +39.2% | +20.2% |
| GPN Global Payments Inc. | 4 of 10 | −30.1% | −11.0% | +29.0% | −25.9% | −36.9% | +18.5% | +77.3% | +2.9% | +44.5% | +7.6% |
| STNE StoneCo Ltd. | 4 of 7 | +85.7% | −55.8% | +90.9% | −44.0% | −79.9% | +110% | +116% | — | — | — |
| FISV Fiserv, Inc. | 6 of 10 | −67.3% | +54.6% | +31.4% | −2.6% | −8.8% | −1.5% | +57.3% | +12.1% | +23.9% | +17.2% |
| FIS Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. | 6 of 10 | −15.8% | +37.0% | −8.2% | −36.5% | −21.9% | +2.7% | +37.2% | +10.3% | +26.1% | +26.6% |
| FOUR Shift4 Payments, Inc. | 4 of 5 | −39.3% | +39.6% | +32.9% | −3.5% | −23.2% | — | — | — | — | — |
| EEFT Euronet Worldwide, Inc. | 3 of 10 | −26.0% | +1.3% | +7.5% | −20.8% | −17.8% | −8.0% | +53.9% | +21.5% | +16.4% | 0.0% |
| PYPL PayPal Holdings, Inc. | 4 of 10 | −31.4% | +39.0% | −13.8% | −62.2% | −19.5% | +117% | +28.6% | +14.2% | +86.5% | +9.0% |
| DLO Dlocal Limited | 2 of 4 | +31.5% | −36.3% | +13.6% | −56.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| IBIT iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF | 1 of 1 | −6.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Risk and diversification
How XYZ has fallen, how it held up in crashes beside the S&P 500 and its popular alternatives, and what moves independently of it.
What were XYZ's worst declines?
A drawdown is the decline from a peak to the lowest point before a new high. This section presents XYZ's five deepest drawdowns since it began trading in 2015, alongside the S&P 500's return over the same dates, and how long each took to recover. Together, these figures show how much an investor could have lost and how long it took to get back to even.
Note: XYZ began trading on November 19, 2015, so this list cannot include the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or two other sell-offs. The crash tests on this page show how older funds and the S&P 500 fared through those years.
- In all five of XYZ's worst declines, the S&P 500 held up better over the same dates.
- Not every decline was the market's doing: XYZ fell 86.1% from August 2021 to October 2023, while the S&P 500 slipped only 2.7%.
- None of these declines kept XYZ below its old high for long; the longest climb back took eight months.
Green means XYZ fell less than the S&P 500 over the same dates. Based on daily closing prices with dividends reinvested.
| During | XYZ fell | S&P 500, same dates | Peak | Low | Time to the low | Back at the peak | Time to recover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 bear market | −86.1% | −2.7% | Aug 2021 | Oct 2023 | 2.2 years | Not yet | — |
| Late-2018 sell-off | −61.5% | −18.9% | Sep 2018 | Mar 2020 | 18 months | Jun 2020 | 3 months |
| No named crash | −44.3% | −2.6% | Apr 2016 | Jun 2016 | 2 months | Feb 2017 | 8 months |
| 2015 China and oil sell-off | −36.1% | −9.0% | Dec 2015 | Feb 2016 | 2 months | Mar 2016 | 1 month |
| No named crash | −29.0% | +3.0% | Nov 2017 | Dec 2017 | 1 month | Mar 2018 | 3 months |
How did XYZ do in stock market crashes?
This section measures how far XYZ, the S&P 500 and each alternative fell from peak to trough during every major market crash since 2000. A smaller decline means an investment held up better, and comparing results across crashes shows whether that resilience was consistent or a one-off.
Note: XYZ began trading on November 19, 2015, so its row reads "Not yet trading" for the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or three other sell-offs. The older alternatives and the S&P 500 show how those crashes played out.
- XYZ fell further than the S&P 500 in all five crashes it has traded through. The clearest case was the 2022 bear market, when XYZ fell 65.8% and the S&P 500 fell 24.5%.
- Among its popular alternatives, MA held up best, falling less than XYZ in all five crashes they both traded through.
- XYZ began trading after the 2008 financial crisis, but seven of its popular alternatives lived through it. The mildest fall among them was INTU's 38.3%, against 55.2% for the S&P 500.
Newest crash first. Each figure is the fund's deepest fall within the crash window; green means a smaller fall than XYZ.
| Investment | Held up better | 2023 regional bank crisisMar 2023 | 2022 bear marketJan 2022 | Covid crashFeb 2020 | Late-2018 sell-offSep 2018 | February 2018 volatility shockFeb 2018 | 2015 China and oil sell-offAug 2015 | 2011 euro debt crisisJul 2011 | 2010 flash crashMay 2010 | 2008 financial crisisOct 2007 | Dot-com bustMar 2000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| XYZ This pageBlock, Inc. | — | −10.9% | −65.8% | −55.5% | −48.8% | −9.4% | Not yet trading | Not yet trading | Not yet trading | Not yet trading | Not yet trading |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 5 of 5 | −3.4% | −24.5% | −33.7% | −19.3% | −6.5% | −12.8% | −17.9% | −1.5% | −55.2% | −47.5% |
| SHOP Shopify Inc. | 4 of 5 | −5.1% | −79.0% | −40.7% | −27.6% | −5.4% | −49.2% | — | — | — | — |
| PAY Paymentus Holdings, Inc. | 0 of 2 | −13.8% | −69.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| TOST Toast, Inc. | 2 of 2 | −9.5% | −58.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| AFRM Affirm Holdings, Inc. | 0 of 2 | −14.8% | −82.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| COIN Coinbase Global, Inc. | 0 of 2 | −15.2% | −81.2% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| HOOD Robinhood Markets, Inc. | 2 of 2 | −6.8% | −60.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| SOFI SoFi Technologies, Inc. | 0 of 2 | −15.2% | −67.8% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| PAGS PagSeguro Digital Ltd. | 3 of 5 | −12.8% | −60.9% | −59.7% | −44.9% | −0.7% | — | — | — | — | — |
| RELY Remitly Global, Inc. | 2 of 2 | −3.8% | −62.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| MA Mastercard Incorporated | 5 of 5 | −4.0% | −28.2% | −41.0% | −21.9% | −5.8% | −20.4% | −13.8% | −3.1% | −62.7% | — |
| V Visa Inc. | 5 of 5 | −3.5% | −24.1% | −36.4% | −19.1% | −5.8% | −15.8% | −11.5% | −0.8% | — | — |
| PAYO Payoneer Global Inc. | 1 of 2 | −14.7% | −51.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| WEX WEX Inc. | 3 of 5 | −10.3% | −30.4% | −64.6% | −34.6% | −9.4% | −42.9% | −29.8% | −2.3% | −79.0% | — |
| INTU Intuit Inc. | 5 of 5 | −6.0% | −42.7% | −36.3% | −20.8% | −6.5% | −24.8% | −18.0% | −3.4% | −38.3% | −66.0% |
| GPN Global Payments Inc. | 4 of 5 | −11.9% | −29.2% | −44.3% | −25.4% | −7.5% | −27.8% | −18.6% | −5.7% | −44.4% | — |
| STNE StoneCo Ltd. | 2 of 3 | −10.2% | −59.0% | −55.2% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FISV Fiserv, Inc. | 4 of 5 | −10.9% | −19.3% | −37.7% | −16.2% | −6.1% | −11.3% | −20.4% | −1.4% | −48.3% | −51.5% |
| FIS Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. | 4 of 5 | −20.2% | −38.5% | −34.7% | −13.1% | −8.0% | −23.4% | −23.3% | 0.0% | −46.4% | — |
| FOUR Shift4 Payments, Inc. | 2 of 2 | −6.2% | −53.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EEFT Euronet Worldwide, Inc. | 4 of 5 | −9.8% | −49.5% | −52.4% | −19.8% | −11.3% | −29.4% | −19.8% | −2.1% | −77.6% | −79.1% |
| PYPL PayPal Holdings, Inc. | 5 of 5 | −4.4% | −63.8% | −31.2% | −16.7% | −5.6% | −21.6% | — | — | — | — |
| DLO Dlocal Limited | 2 of 2 | −8.8% | −54.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
How closely does XYZ move with the S&P 500?
Upside capture measures how much of the S&P 500's gains an investment kept in the months the market rose, and downside capture how much of its losses it took in the months the market fell. An investment that captures more of the gains than the losses has compounded ahead of the market over time. This section compares XYZ with its popular alternatives on both measures, and on beta (how strongly each has moved with the market), over the past 10 years.
- SHOP took just 203% of the S&P 500's losses, against 273% for XYZ, while still keeping 233% of its gains.
- Over the past 10 years, XYZ captured 212% of the S&P 500's gains in rising months and 273% of its losses in falling months, with a beta of 2.52. It amplified the market's moves in both directions.
- Four of the ten popular alternatives had a higher capture ratio (upside capture divided by downside capture) than XYZ's 0.78, led by MA, V and SHOP.
Monthly total returns over the past 10 years, measured against SPY. 100% capture or a beta of 1.00 means moving in line with the S&P 500. Green marks a better figure than XYZ's: more upside, less downside or a higher capture ratio. Sorted by capture ratio.
| Investment | Upside capture | Downside capture | Capture ratio | Beta |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| XYZ This pageBlock, Inc. | 212% | 273% | 0.78 | 2.52 |
| MA Mastercard Incorporated | 105% | 88% | 1.20 | 0.95 |
| V Visa Inc. | 93% | 79% | 1.18 | 0.87 |
| SHOP Shopify Inc. | 233% | 203% | 1.15 | 2.09 |
| INTU Intuit Inc. | 99% | 126% | 0.79 | 1.03 |
| WEX WEX Inc. | 114% | 190% | 0.60 | 1.37 |
| PYPL PayPal Holdings, Inc. | 106% | 186% | 0.57 | 1.25 |
| GPN Global Payments Inc. | 76% | 139% | 0.54 | 0.98 |
| FISV Fiserv, Inc. | 51% | 107% | 0.48 | 0.86 |
| EEFT Euronet Worldwide, Inc. | 65% | 144% | 0.45 | 1.22 |
| FIS Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. | 54% | 150% | 0.36 | 0.82 |
What diversifies XYZ?
Correlation measures how closely two investments move together, on a scale from 1 (in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to -1 (in opposite directions). This section lists large ETFs and stocks whose returns have had a low correlation with XYZ's. Because such investments tend not to fall at the same time, pairing XYZ with them can reduce a portfolio's overall swings.
- Moving a fifth of the money in XYZ into MCK would have cut the portfolio's volatility by 19% over the past 5 years and raised its annual return (-21.1% for XYZ alone, -9.3% for the mix).
- MCK made money in three of the three calendar years in which XYZ lost money.
- Among large ETFs, LVHI, DXJ and EMLP have moved largely independently of XYZ over the past 5 years, with correlations of 0.47 or lower, and each still earned a positive 5-year return.
Only ETFs with at least $1.0B in assets and stocks worth at least $10B, with a correlation below 0.5 over the past 5 years and a positive return, are included, ranked by Sharpe ratio; funds that hold the same thing are shown once. The year columns are the years in which XYZ lost money. The last two columns show a portfolio that is 80% XYZ and 20% the other investment, rebalanced monthly.
ETFs
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2025 | 2022 | 2021 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| XYZ Block, Inc. (this page) | 1.00 | −69.4% | -0.10 | −23.4% | −61.1% | −25.8% | 56.5% | −21.1% |
| LVHI InternationalFranklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 0.41 | +119% | 1.48 | +27.1% | +3.8% | +17.8% | 46.0% | −12.6% |
| DXJ InternationalWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund | 0.33 | +225% | 1.34 | +32.8% | +6.0% | +18.0% | 46.1% | −11.0% |
| EMLP Broad MarketFirst Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund | 0.47 | +101% | 1.04 | +9.7% | +10.4% | +23.1% | 46.7% | −12.9% |
| EWP Broad MarketiShares MSCI Spain ETF | 0.42 | +140% | 0.97 | +78.0% | −5.2% | +0.2% | 46.9% | −12.1% |
| GLD CommoditiesSPDR Gold Shares | 0.10 | +126% | 0.96 | +63.7% | −0.8% | −4.2% | 45.7% | −12.1% |
| XLE EnergyState Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | 0.16 | +177% | 0.93 | +7.9% | +64.4% | +53.3% | 46.4% | −11.3% |
| EWT TechnologyiShares MSCI Taiwan ETF | 0.49 | +153% | 0.89 | +28.4% | −28.9% | +28.9% | 47.9% | −12.2% |
| AMLP EnergyAlerian MLP ETF | 0.38 | +111% | 0.89 | +5.8% | +25.5% | +39.1% | 46.7% | −12.4% |
Stocks
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2025 | 2022 | 2021 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| XYZ Block, Inc. (this page) | 1.00 | −69.4% | -0.10 | −23.4% | −61.1% | −25.8% | 56.5% | −21.1% |
| CAH Medical - DistributionCardinal Health, Inc. | 0.24 | +479% | 1.55 | +76.3% | +54.1% | −0.4% | 46.8% | −9.3% |
| CLS Hardware, Equipment & PartsCelestica Inc. | 0.45 | +3,143% | 1.47 | +220% | +1.3% | +37.9% | 51.5% | −0.7% |
| FIX Engineering & ConstructionComfort Systems USA, Inc. | 0.47 | +1,636% | 1.46 | +121% | +17.0% | +89.0% | 50.1% | −3.6% |
| MCK Medical - DistributionMcKesson Corporation | 0.00 | +413% | 1.44 | +44.5% | +51.8% | +44.2% | 45.5% | −9.3% |
| MPC Oil & Gas Refining & MarketingMarathon Petroleum Corporation | 0.17 | +690% | 1.41 | +19.2% | +86.6% | +61.0% | 46.8% | −7.6% |
Common questions
What was XYZ's worst drawdown?
XYZ's deepest decline since it began trading in 2015 was 86.1%, from August 2021 to October 2023. It has not yet climbed back to that peak. Because XYZ launched in November 2015, that record does not include the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or two other sell-offs.
What were XYZ's best and worst years?
Over ten full calendar years, XYZ's best year was 2020, when it returned 248%. Its worst was 2022, with a return of -61.1%.
Is there a better investment than XYZ?
Among XYZ's popular alternatives, V, MA and WEX earned more than XYZ with less volatility over the past 5 years. V returned 12.8% a year at 22.9% volatility, against a loss of 21.1% a year at 59.9%. Looking beyond its popular alternatives, AAPL (digital payments theme) and MSFT (software) earned more than XYZ with less volatility over the past 5 years. AAPL returned 18.5% a year at 28.0% volatility, against a loss of 21.1% a year at 59.9%.
Is XYZ more volatile than the S&P 500?
Yes. XYZ's volatility over the past 5 years was 59.9%, 3.5 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, XYZ's return lands within 59.9% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump.
What is XYZ's Sharpe ratio?
XYZ's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was -0.10, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so XYZ earned less for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings.
How correlated is XYZ with the S&P 500?
Over the past 5 years, XYZ's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.71 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They often move together: some diversification next to an index fund, but not a cushion. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against XYZ instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a XYZ holding.
What are the best alternatives to XYZ?
Of the 23 popular alternatives we compared, three outperformed XYZ in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes, with dividends reinvested: SHOP, PAY and TOST.
Did XYZ outperform the S&P 500?
XYZ finished ahead of the S&P 500 (SPY) in three of ten full calendar years. In 2025, it returned -23.4%, against +17.7% for the index.
How did XYZ do in stock market crashes?
XYZ fell less than the S&P 500 (SPY) in none of the five major crashes it has traded through, and further in five. The clearest case was the 2022 bear market, when XYZ fell 65.8% and the S&P 500 fell 24.5%.
What diversifies XYZ?
These had a low correlation with XYZ over the past 5 years and still earned a positive 5-year return: among large ETFs, LVHI (correlation 0.41), DXJ (correlation 0.33) and EMLP (correlation 0.47); among large stocks, CAH (correlation 0.24), CLS (correlation 0.45) and FIX (correlation 0.47). A correlation near zero means the two have moved largely independently.
How we measure
- Short-term periods are 1M, 3M, 6M, YTD, 1Y; long-term periods are 3Y, 5Y, 10Y. An investment outperformed in a period when its total return, with dividends reinvested, was higher than XYZ's. Returns within 0.5 points or 3% of XYZ's, whichever is larger, count as a tie.
- "Qualified" means outperforming in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods. "All-weather" means outperforming in every long-term period and all but one short-term period.
- Popular alternatives are the funds and stocks most often compared with this one. We include only those that trade today, are not leveraged or inverse, and hold at least $200 million.
- Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily returns over 5 years, a measure of how much the price typically swings in a year. The Sharpe ratio is the return above cash for each unit of that volatility.
- A decline, or drawdown, runs from a peak to the lowest close before the next high. The worst decline ever uses all the price history we have; comparisons between funds use the past 10 years so that younger funds are judged on the same stretch.
- Sector overlap is the share of assets two funds hold in the same sectors. Correlation and the mixed-portfolio figures use monthly returns.
- Upside and downside capture follow Morningstar's definition: the compound monthly return in the months the S&P 500 rose (or fell), divided by the S&P 500's compound return in those months. Beta measures how strongly monthly returns have moved with the S&P 500. All three use the same window for every investment.
- Figures are computed from daily adjusted prices and update after each trading day. Past performance does not predict future results.
More research
Popular alternatives to XYZ
SHOPShopify
COINCoinbase Global
HOODRobinhood Markets
MAMastercard
VVisa
INTUIntuit
PYPLPayPal
IBITiShares Bitcoin Trust ETF