Relative Intelligence · Data Center REITs

How Digital Realty Trust (DLR) compares with the whole market and its popular alternatives
Built by QuantCommons' quantitative engine, this page is about relative opportunity, not data on DLR alone. It places DLR (Digital Realty Trust, Inc.) against 11 popular alternatives, its neighboring categories and the entire market of over 10,000 U.S.-listed stocks and ETFs, and surfaces what has done better on consistent outperformance, return for the risk taken, behavior in real market crashes and diversification. The result is a clearer view of where DLR stands in the market, and of the alternatives worth a closer look.
Period covered: DLR's full trading record, from October 2004 through September 2026. The crash tests reach back to 2000 using older funds and the S&P 500. All returns include reinvested dividends. Data as of October 20, 2026.
Data as of October 20, 2026. Full tables and charts read best on a larger screen.
On this page12 sections
Key findings
- Right nowDLR has gone against the market, falling 12.9% over the past 6 months while the S&P 500 rose 9.1%. Not every peer went the same way. Over the past 6 months, AMT (American Tower) rose 3.1% and UNIT (Uniti Group) fell 53.8%. Consistency ↓
- Stock or market?DLR rose 0.1% over the past 3 months, 5.8 points ahead of the data center reits ETF SRVR (Pacer Data & Infrastructure Real Estate ETF), which fell 5.7%. The S&P 500 rose 3.9%. Its data center reit peers did not move as one over the past 3 months: AMT (American Tower) rose 11.1%, while UNIT (Uniti Group) fell 49.7%.
- Past 1 to 3 yearsOver the past year, DLR rose 4.3% against 15.8% for the S&P 500 and 17.9% for the Nasdaq 100. The same gap shows up over 3 years (65.7% against 89.3%). DLR led its data center reit peers in 2023, then fell behind EQIX (Equinix) and IRM (Iron Mountain) in 2025. By year ↓
- Long termDLR turned $10,000 into $25,400 over the past decade, against $42,100 in the S&P 500. Even so, over the past decade, only EQIX (Equinix) and IRM (Iron Mountain) of its data center reit peers outpaced DLR. Growth of $10,000 ↓
- In a crashThe 2022 bear market took 45.7% off DLR, against 24.5% for the S&P 500. That was more than EQIX (Equinix, 36.3%) but less than UNIT (Uniti Group, 51.9%). Crash tests ↓
- DiversificationDLR is more of the same, not a cushion: a correlation of 0.61 with the S&P 500 over 5 years and 0.61 with the total US market, more closely than 91% of stocks worth at least $300 million. DLR cushions stocks less than it used to: its correlation with the S&P 500 rose to 0.61 over the past 5 years, from 0.13 in the 5 years before. Market capture ↓
- Better options
- Popular alternatives
- MSFT (Microsoft) earned more for the risk it took than DLR over the past 5 years, and its worst fall in 10 years was 37.1%, against 48.5% for DLR.
- Nearby categories and themes
- CIBR (First Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity ETF, cybersecurity) and LAMR (Lamar Advertising, specialty reits) earned more than DLR with less volatility over the past 5 years. CIBR returned 14.1% a year at 26.1% volatility, against 6.3% a year at 29.4%.
- Versus the S&P 500
- Simply owning the S&P 500 would have done better over the past 5 years: 12.7% a year at 17.1% volatility, against 6.3% at 29.4% for DLR.
How much would $10,000 in DLR have grown?
This chart tracks a hypothetical $10,000 investment in DLR over the past 21 years, with dividends reinvested, alongside the same amount in the S&P 500, investments that ended ahead of DLR over the same span and DLR's popular alternatives, among those that traded for the entire period. A second view covers the past 5 years, the period the better options further down the page are judged on. It shows not only where each investment ended up but also how smooth or uneven the path was.
Note: DLR began trading on October 29, 2004, so the chart cannot reach back to the dot-com bust. It covers the most recent 21 years of DLR's record, starting at the end of September 2005.
- $10,000 invested in DLR at the end of September 2005 would have grown to $216,443 by September 2026, more than the $90,973 it would have become in SPY, an S&P 500 fund.
- Five of the eight other investments on the chart ended ahead of DLR, and AMZN finished highest, at $1,097,509.
Choose a period
From the end of September 2005 to the end of September 2026. The scale is logarithmic, so equal steps up the chart are equal percentage gains. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 146 of the 1,562 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of DLR; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- AMZN$1M+10,875% total · +25.1% a year
- GOOG$436,286+4,263% total · +19.7% a year
- EQIX$331,771+3,218% total · +18.1% a year
- MSFT$288,659+2,787% total · +17.4% a year
- ETN$235,571+2,256% total · +16.2% a year
- DLR$216,443+2,064% total · +15.8% a year
- IRM$112,069+1,021% total · +12.2% a year
- AMT$92,477+825% total · +11.2% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$90,973+810% total · +11.1% a year
- CCI$45,461+355% total · +7.5% a year
From the end of September 2021 to the end of September 2026. The scale is logarithmic, so equal steps up the chart are equal percentage gains. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 1,663 of the 3,628 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of DLR; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- VRT$100,677+907% total · +58.7% a year
- ETN$31,102+211% total · +25.5% a year
- IRM$30,845+208% total · +25.3% a year
- GOOG$25,811+158% total · +20.9% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$19,000+90.0% total · +13.7% a year
- MSFT$18,958+89.6% total · +13.6% a year
- AMZN$15,169+51.7% total · +8.7% a year
- DLR$14,403+44.0% total · +7.6% a year
- EQIX$14,143+41.4% total · +7.2% a year
- AMT$7,254−27.5% total · −6.2% a year
DLR at a glance
This section summarizes the key facts about the stock, its returns over periods from one to ten years and the risk it has carried, with dividends reinvested throughout. These figures serve as the baseline for every comparison that follows.
Note: DLR began trading on October 29, 2004, so every figure here, including its worst decline, covers only the time since then. None of them reflect the dot-com bust.
- DLR's deepest decline since it began trading in 2004 was 56.8%, from September to November 2008. It took 12 months from the low to climb back to its old high.
- Over 21 full calendar years, DLR's best was 2005, when it returned 77.9%, and its worst was 2022, when it lost 41.0%. It lost money in five of those years.
- DLR is 12.9% below its all-time high.
The company
- Market value
- $65B
- Industry
- REIT - Specialty
- Price history from
- October 2004
Returns
- Past 1 year
- +4.3%total return
- Past 3 years
- +65.7%+18.3% a year
- Past 5 years
- +35.7%+6.3% a year
- Past 10 years
- +154%+9.8% a year
- Best calendar year
- +77.9%2005
- Worst calendar year
- −41.0%2022
- Losing years
- 5 of 21full calendar years
Risk
- Volatility
- 29.4%typical yearly swing, 5 years
- Sharpe ratio
- 0.35return per unit of risk, 5 years
- Worst decline ever
- −56.8%Sep 2008 to Nov 2008
- From its all-time high
- −12.9%below the peak
DLR against the whole market
Where DLR ranks among every stock and fund, and what across the market has done better.
How does DLR rank among all stocks?
This section ranks DLR on return, volatility, risk-adjusted return and worst decline against every stock worth at least $300 million with enough history. Where the comparisons with its popular alternatives show how DLR stacks up against its peers, these rankings show where it stands in the market as a whole.
- DLR's worst decline of the past 10 years ranks in the top 18% of the 2,187 stocks worth at least $300 million, where the top fell the least.
Ranked against U.S.-listed stocks worth at least $300M that have enough history for each measure, so the count changes from row to row; smaller stocks are left out. Lower volatility and smaller declines rank higher.
| Measure | DLR | Rank | Standing |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +4.3% | 1,799 of 3,287 | bottom 46% |
| 3-year return | +65.7% | 1,317 of 3,017 | top 44% |
| 5-year return | +35.7% | 1,267 of 2,893 | top 44% |
| 10-year return | +154% | 1,062 of 2,202 | top 48% |
| Volatility, 5 years | 29.4% | 669 of 2,893 | top 23% |
| Sharpe ratio, 5 years | 0.35 | 1,381 of 2,893 | top 48% |
| Worst decline, past 10 years | −48.5% | 402 of 2,187 | top 18% |
What has beaten DLR on both return and risk?
Each dot is an investment, placed by how much it earned a year over the past 5 years (higher is better) and how much its price swung, its volatility (further left is calmer). DLR sits where the dashed lines cross. Anything in the green box above and to the left earned more than DLR with smaller swings, a better trade-off over this period on both counts. Past results are no promise, but a name in the box is worth a closer look.
- 234 stocks and 508 ETFs worth at least $500 million sit in the green region: each earned more than DLR over the past 5 years with smaller price swings. That is 20% of the 3,633 screened.
- Among those with at least half DLR's swings, CAH has the best return for its risk: 42.1% a year at 24.7% volatility, 16% less than DLR's 29.4%, and a Sharpe ratio (return above cash per unit of volatility) of 1.55 against 0.35 for DLR.
- None of DLR's popular alternatives made it, but KT (data centers theme) did: 13.1% a year at 22.6% volatility, 23% less than DLR's 29.4%.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested, and volatility the annualized swing in daily prices, both over 5 years. Labeled dots are the strongest picks from the table below and the names called out above, colored by how close they sit to DLR; faint dots are 93 more of the 742 in the green region (the strongest, one per fund family). 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million were screened. Hover over a dot for its figures.
- Popular alternatives
- Same and neighboring categories, and shared themes
- The whole market
- Others in the green region
Is there a better investment than DLR?
Investments that beat DLR over the past 5 years on return, volatility, drawdowns, consistency, crash losses or fees, from its popular alternatives out to the whole market.
- Among DLR's popular alternatives, MSFT earned more for the risk it took than DLR over the past 5 years, and its worst fall in 10 years was 37.1%, against 48.5% for DLR.
- Looking beyond its popular alternatives, CIBR (cybersecurity) and LAMR (specialty reits) earned more than DLR with less volatility over the past 5 years. CIBR returned 14.1% a year at 26.1% volatility, against 6.3% a year at 29.4%.
- Simply owning the S&P 500 would have done better over the past 5 years: 12.7% a year at 17.1% volatility, against 6.3% at 29.4% for DLR.
How this works
The table below lists investments that beat DLR over the past 5 years on at least one of these measures: a higher annual return with lower volatility, a higher annual return at similar volatility, a similar return with lower volatility, a higher Sharpe ratio with a smaller worst decline, a higher total return in most periods from 3 months to 10 years, or smaller losses in recent market crashes. It checks DLR's popular alternatives first, then the rest of its own and neighboring categories, then every stock and fund worth at least $500 million, and shows the strongest few in each group. The full list of those with a higher return and lower volatility than DLR follows the table.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested. Annual return, volatility and the Sharpe ratio cover 5 years; the worst decline covers the past 10 years. Green marks a better figure than DLR's. "On the frontier" means no other option shown or tested earned more with less volatility. Funds that hold the same thing are shown once. Beyond the popular alternatives, nothing with more than 1.5× DLR's volatility counts as better.
These figures cover the past 5 years. Green marks a better figure than DLR's.
| Investment | Why it is better | Past 5 years | Downside | Long run | Fit | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Annual return?higher is better | Volatility?lower is calmer | Sharpe?return per unit of risk | Worst decline?past 10 years | 10Y returntotal | Corr. with DLR?lower diversifies more | Expenseper year | |||
| +6.3% | 29.4% | 0.35 | −48.5% | +154% | 1.00 | — | |||
| +12.7% | 17.1% | 0.79 | −33.7% | +321% | 0.61 | 0.09% | |||
| Popular alternativesbest 6 shownThe investments people most often weigh against DLR. 6 of 11 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return, similar volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +12.5% | 28.2% | 0.56 | −37.1% | +946% | 0.45 | — | ||
IRMIron Mountain Incorporated · Specialty REITs | Higher return, similar volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +24.6% | 30.3% | 0.88 | −39.0% | +470% | 0.64 | — | |
| Higher return, similar volatilityHigher return in most periods | +19.0% | 32.0% | 0.71 | −44.6% | +752% | 0.37 | — | ||
| Higher return in most periods | +9.0% | 36.6% | 0.42 | −56.1% | +548% | 0.47 | — | ||
| Higher return in most periods | +6.6% | 27.8% | 0.37 | −41.8% | +226% | 0.73 | — | ||
| Higher return, similar volatility | +20.4% | 32.1% | 0.74 | −44.5% | +657% | 0.60 | — | ||
| Same and neighboring categories, and shared themesbest 6 shownEverything else in Data Center REITs and the categories next to it (Specialty REITs, Electrical Equipment, Software, E-Commerce), plus DLR's specific themes. 21 of 102 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
CIBRFirst Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity ETF · Cybersecurity | Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +14.1% | 26.1% | 0.64 | −33.9% | +454% | 0.27 | 0.58% | |
LAMRLamar Advertising Company · Specialty REITs | Higher return, lower volatilityHigher return in most periods | +10.7% | 26.5% | 0.52 | −65.8% | +278% | 0.48 | — | |
| Higher return, similar volatilityHigher return in most periods | +11.5% | 30.0% | 0.52 | −52.5% | +205% | 0.40 | — | ||
FFIVF5, Inc. · Cybersecurity | Higher return, similar volatilityHigher return in most periods | +17.1% | 30.8% | 0.67 | −54.6% | +287% | 0.37 | — | |
HUBBHubbell Incorporated · Electrical Equipment | Higher return, similar volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +21.0% | 30.0% | 0.79 | −41.6% | +442% | 0.38 | — | |
| Higher return in most periods | +31.9% | 43.4% | 0.86 | −48.0% | +1,274% | 0.17 | — | ||
| The whole marketbest 8 shownEvery other stock and fund worth at least $500 million. 1,361 of 3,520 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| On the frontierHigher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +17.3% | 18.2% | 0.97 | −40.0% | +352% | 0.28 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +11.5% | 17.5% | 0.71 | −35.0% | +302% | 0.61 | 0.03% | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +12.8% | 16.9% | 0.80 | −34.0% | +324% | 0.61 | 0.03% | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +20.8% | 22.6% | 0.96 | −25.7% | +508% | 0.47 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +13.4% | 17.1% | 0.82 | −29.6% | +274% | 0.21 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +12.7% | 17.9% | 0.76 | −27.4% | +196% | 0.02 | — | ||
| Higher return, similar volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +18.5% | 28.0% | 0.75 | −38.5% | +1,168% | 0.34 | — | ||
| Similar return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +6.8% | 17.6% | 0.47 | −39.4% | +198% | 0.61 | 0.03% | ||
What these numbers mean for DLR
- Annual return
- DLR returned 6.3% a year over the past 5 years with dividends reinvested, against 12.7% a year for the S&P 500. At that pace, $10,000 became about $13,600. Annual return is the steady yearly rate that would produce the same total result, so investments held over the same span compare fairly. Guide: What is performance and return? →
- Volatility
- DLR's volatility over the past 5 years was 29.4%, 1.7 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, DLR's return lands within 29.4% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump. Guide: Understanding and measuring risk (volatility) →
- Sharpe ratio
- DLR's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.35, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so DLR earned less for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings. Guide: Balancing reward with risk (Sharpe ratio) →
- Worst decline
- DLR's worst fall from a peak to a low over the past 10 years was 48.5%, against 33.7% for the S&P 500. Losses and gains are not symmetric: climbing back from a 48.5% fall takes a 94.3% gain. Guide: Market crash risk and tail risk →
- Correlation
- Over the past 5 years, DLR's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.61 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They often move together: some diversification next to an index fund, but not a cushion. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against DLR instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a DLR holding. Guide: Correlation and diversification →
Show all 742 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that earned more than DLR with less volatility
Out of 3,633 tested over 5 years. The strongest 100 are listed, best first, with funds that hold the same thing listed once.
| # | Investment | Found in | Annual return | Volatility | Sharpe | Worst decline | 10Y return | Corr. with DLR | Expense |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Whole market | +17.3% | 18.2% | 0.97 | −40.0% | +352% | 0.28 | — | |
| 2 | Whole market | +11.5% | 17.5% | 0.71 | −35.0% | +302% | 0.61 | 0.03% | |
| 3 | Whole market | +12.8% | 16.9% | 0.80 | −34.0% | +324% | 0.61 | 0.03% | |
| 4 | Whole market | +20.8% | 22.6% | 0.96 | −25.7% | +508% | 0.47 | — | |
| 5 | Whole market | +13.4% | 17.1% | 0.82 | −29.6% | +274% | 0.21 | — | |
| 6 | Whole market | +12.7% | 17.9% | 0.76 | −27.4% | +196% | 0.02 | — | |
| 7 | Whole market | +12.8% | 22.9% | 0.64 | −36.4% | +429% | 0.38 | — | |
| 8 | DXJWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund · International Equity | Whole market | +26.6% | 19.1% | 1.34 | −39.1% | +428% | 0.36 | 0.48% |
| 9 | LVHIFranklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +17.0% | 11.1% | 1.48 | −32.4% | +194% | 0.38 | 0.40% |
| 10 | Whole market | +14.7% | 16.8% | 0.91 | −37.0% | +204% | 0.16 | — | |
| 11 | Whole market | +17.4% | 22.9% | 0.82 | −31.4% | +685% | 0.59 | — | |
| 12 | Whole market | +8.2% | 16.4% | 0.57 | −36.0% | +140% | 0.50 | 0.05% | |
| 13 | Whole market | +14.5% | 23.0% | 0.71 | −35.1% | +553% | 0.55 | 0.18% | |
| 14 | Whole market | +12.4% | 23.8% | 0.61 | −41.0% | +541% | 0.36 | — | |
| 15 | Whole market | +21.0% | 23.4% | 0.94 | −42.9% | +242% | 0.16 | — | |
| 16 | Whole market | +16.8% | 26.1% | 0.73 | −42.0% | +374% | 0.28 | — | |
| 17 | Whole market | +38.7% | 25.0% | 1.44 | −38.1% | +586% | 0.22 | — | |
| 18 | Whole market | +16.3% | 24.8% | 0.74 | −43.4% | +241% | -0.09 | — | |
| 19 | Whole market | +17.1% | 20.7% | 0.87 | −26.8% | +226% | 0.13 | — | |
| 20 | Whole market | +12.1% | 13.7% | 0.90 | −36.8% | +235% | 0.46 | 0.03% | |
| 21 | Whole market | +19.6% | 24.9% | 0.85 | −24.9% | +266% | 0.04 | — | |
| 22 | Whole market | +22.8% | 24.9% | 0.95 | −30.5% | +200% | 0.08 | — | |
| 23 | Whole market | +9.3% | 16.9% | 0.61 | −35.8% | +153% | 0.49 | 0.03% | |
| 24 | Whole market | +15.8% | 20.0% | 0.84 | −42.0% | +310% | 0.26 | — | |
| 25 | Whole market | +11.5% | 20.9% | 0.63 | −32.6% | +394% | 0.41 | — | |
| 26 | Whole market | +18.4% | 26.0% | 0.78 | −35.1% | +779% | 0.53 | 0.09% | |
| 27 | Whole market | +21.3% | 25.6% | 0.89 | −30.3% | +816% | 0.06 | — | |
| 28 | Whole market | +15.7% | 20.4% | 0.82 | −42.6% | +248% | 0.17 | — | |
| 29 | Whole market | +10.4% | 14.1% | 0.78 | −31.7% | +258% | 0.58 | 0.04% | |
| 30 | Whole market | +22.7% | 27.7% | 0.88 | −40.5% | +955% | 0.61 | — | |
| 31 | Whole market | +24.2% | 22.8% | 1.07 | −32.4% | +406% | 0.26 | — | |
| 32 | Whole market | +9.7% | 14.3% | 0.72 | −33.4% | +252% | 0.44 | 0.06% | |
| 33 | Whole market | +9.8% | 25.2% | 0.50 | −39.4% | +60.7% | 0.21 | — | |
| 34 | Whole market | +26.3% | 24.9% | 1.07 | −41.6% | +654% | 0.47 | — | |
| 35 | Whole market | +17.2% | 24.9% | 0.77 | −30.4% | +285% | 0.23 | — | |
| 36 | Whole market | +11.1% | 24.2% | 0.56 | −36.7% | +204% | 0.04 | — | |
| 37 | Whole market | +10.3% | 16.2% | 0.69 | −34.2% | +223% | 0.60 | 0.06% | |
| 38 | Whole market | +11.2% | 20.8% | 0.62 | −37.4% | +319% | 0.34 | — | |
| 39 | Whole market | +13.9% | 18.5% | 0.80 | −34.0% | +446% | 0.32 | — | |
| 40 | Whole market | +9.0% | 22.9% | 0.49 | −40.8% | +320% | 0.42 | — | |
| 41 | Whole market | +8.2% | 16.1% | 0.57 | −39.0% | +211% | 0.55 | 0.20% | |
| 42 | Whole market | +15.9% | 23.4% | 0.75 | −42.0% | +393% | 0.17 | — | |
| 43 | Whole market | +14.8% | 23.6% | 0.71 | −32.8% | +625% | 0.45 | — | |
| 44 | Whole market | +9.3% | 19.2% | 0.56 | −30.1% | +344% | 0.39 | — | |
| 45 | Whole market | +11.8% | 22.6% | 0.61 | −39.2% | +118% | 0.43 | — | |
| 46 | Whole market | +19.2% | 22.4% | 0.90 | −42.0% | +311% | 0.41 | — | |
| 47 | Whole market | +12.4% | 20.2% | 0.68 | −32.9% | +185% | 0.26 | — | |
| 48 | Whole market | +17.0% | 26.2% | 0.73 | −41.4% | +356% | 0.06 | — | |
| 49 | Whole market | +15.8% | 24.6% | 0.72 | −30.7% | +576% | 0.51 | — | |
| 50 | Whole market | +8.3% | 23.3% | 0.46 | −40.5% | +446% | 0.57 | — | |
| 51 | Whole market | +13.1% | 22.4% | 0.67 | −34.5% | +451% | 0.60 | 0.04% | |
| 52 | Whole market | +14.4% | 22.1% | 0.72 | −42.7% | +481% | 0.53 | — | |
| 53 | Whole market | +14.7% | 17.5% | 0.87 | −34.7% | — | 0.62 | 0.26% | |
| 54 | Whole market | +10.8% | 21.9% | 0.58 | −41.6% | +160% | 0.33 | — | |
| 55 | CBOECboe Global Markets, Inc. · Capital Markets | Whole market | +21.5% | 25.1% | 0.91 | −43.2% | +463% | 0.26 | — |
| 56 | Whole market | +17.9% | 25.4% | 0.78 | −42.5% | +284% | 0.29 | — | |
| 57 | Whole market | +12.3% | 25.3% | 0.59 | −42.1% | +323% | 0.16 | — | |
| 58 | EFViShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +13.6% | 15.9% | 0.88 | −43.2% | +157% | 0.37 | 0.31% |
| 59 | Whole market | +8.6% | 18.3% | 0.54 | −42.9% | +241% | 0.44 | 0.08% | |
| 60 | Whole market | +8.4% | 15.3% | 0.60 | −28.4% | +202% | 0.17 | 0.08% | |
| 61 | Whole market | +8.9% | 24.7% | 0.47 | −38.3% | +407% | 0.38 | — | |
| 62 | FNDFSchwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +13.6% | 16.3% | 0.87 | −40.2% | +194% | 0.42 | 0.25% |
| 63 | VOEVanguard Morningstar Mid-Cap Value ETF · US Mid-Cap Equity | Whole market | +9.4% | 15.8% | 0.65 | −43.2% | +182% | 0.55 | 0.05% |
| 64 | SPMOInvesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF · US Momentum Equity | Whole market | +18.7% | 20.8% | 0.93 | −30.9% | +499% | 0.41 | 0.13% |
| 65 | XLIState Street Industrial Select Sector SPDR ETF · US Industrials | Whole market | +11.5% | 17.6% | 0.71 | −42.3% | +246% | 0.54 | 0.08% |
| 66 | AVLVAvantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF · US Large-Cap Value | Whole market | +14.0% | 16.9% | 0.86 | −19.5% | — | 0.54 | 0.15% |
| 67 | PVALPutnam Focused Large Cap Value ETF · US Large-Cap Value | Whole market | +16.1% | 15.1% | 1.07 | −41.3% | — | 0.50 | 0.56% |
| 68 | HDViShares Core High Dividend ETF · US Dividend Equity | Whole market | +12.9% | 13.0% | 1.00 | −37.0% | +172% | 0.33 | 0.08% |
| 69 | AVDVAvantis International Small Cap Value ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +13.9% | 17.4% | 0.84 | −43.0% | — | 0.42 | 0.36% |
| 70 | RDVYFirst Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF · US Dividend Equity | Whole market | +11.3% | 18.8% | 0.67 | −40.6% | +322% | 0.51 | 0.47% |
| 71 | DGXQuest Diagnostics Incorporated · Medical Diagnostics | Whole market | +12.3% | 22.5% | 0.63 | −36.6% | +243% | 0.29 | — |
| 72 | USMViShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF · US Low-Volatility Equity | Whole market | +7.6% | 12.3% | 0.66 | −33.1% | +176% | 0.52 | 0.15% |
| 73 | EMXCiShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF · Emerging Markets Equity | Whole market | +11.1% | 19.5% | 0.64 | −42.8% | — | 0.41 | 0.25% |
| 74 | AVEMAvantis Emerging Markets Equity ETF · Emerging Markets Equity | Whole market | +9.3% | 19.5% | 0.56 | −36.0% | — | 0.45 | 0.33% |
| 75 | SPHQInvesco S&P 500 Quality ETF · US Quality Equity | Whole market | +12.0% | 16.7% | 0.76 | −31.6% | +300% | 0.52 | 0.20% |
| 76 | PKGPackaging Corporation of America · Packaging | Whole market | +15.4% | 25.8% | 0.69 | −38.2% | +294% | 0.45 | — |
| 77 | DTMDT Midstream, Inc. · Oil & Gas Midstream | Whole market | +24.5% | 25.2% | 1.00 | −23.6% | — | 0.38 | — |
| 78 | EXPDExpeditors International of Washington, Inc. · Freight & Logistics | Whole market | +12.0% | 27.1% | 0.56 | −35.6% | +349% | 0.35 | — |
| 79 | RNRRenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd. · Insurance | Whole market | +20.1% | 27.8% | 0.80 | −40.7% | +215% | 0.23 | — |
| 80 | EVRGEvergy, Inc. · Electric Utilities | Whole market | +9.5% | 18.9% | 0.57 | −38.8% | +109% | 0.29 | — |
| 81 | BBJPJPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +9.3% | 18.6% | 0.57 | −32.7% | — | 0.44 | 0.19% |
| 82 | FDVVFidelity High Dividend ETF · US Dividend Equity | Whole market | +13.2% | 14.6% | 0.92 | −40.2% | +253% | 0.54 | 0.15% |
| 83 | DBEFXtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +13.1% | 13.8% | 0.96 | −32.5% | +206% | 0.48 | 0.35% |
| 84 | IOOiShares Global 100 ETF · Global Equity | Whole market | +15.7% | 17.2% | 0.94 | −31.4% | +361% | 0.57 | 0.40% |
| 85 | EHCEncompass Health Corporation · Health Care Facilities | Whole market | +18.4% | 26.8% | 0.77 | −39.5% | +340% | 0.28 | — |
| 86 | JQUAJPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF · US Quality Equity | Whole market | +13.6% | 15.7% | 0.89 | −32.9% | — | 0.59 | 0.12% |
| 87 | VLUEiShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF · US Large-Cap Value | Whole market | +15.9% | 18.4% | 0.90 | −39.5% | +286% | 0.40 | 0.15% |
| 88 | LECOLincoln Electric Holdings, Inc. · Industrial Machinery | Whole market | +14.1% | 27.5% | 0.62 | −38.9% | +389% | 0.45 | — |
| 89 | MSGSMadison Square Garden Sports Corp. · Entertainment | Whole market | +18.4% | 25.6% | 0.79 | −41.6% | +432% | 0.16 | — |
| 90 | GRIDFirst Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund · Infrastructure Equity | Whole market | +12.5% | 22.0% | 0.65 | −40.6% | +383% | 0.58 | 0.56% |
| 91 | IGFiShares Global Infrastructure ETF · Infrastructure Equity | Whole market | +9.0% | 13.9% | 0.69 | −42.1% | +113% | 0.49 | 0.37% |
| 92 | NEUNewMarket Corporation · Specialty Chemicals | Whole market | +21.0% | 26.8% | 0.85 | −40.7% | +165% | 0.20 | — |
| 93 | FNDESchwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Large Company Index ETF · Emerging Markets Equity | Whole market | +9.8% | 17.0% | 0.64 | −39.9% | +151% | 0.42 | 0.39% |
| 94 | MOATVanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF · US Large-Cap Equity | Whole market | +9.1% | 18.4% | 0.57 | −33.3% | +276% | 0.50 | 0.46% |
| 95 | Whole market | +42.1% | 24.7% | 1.55 | −46.1% | +349% | 0.13 | — | |
| 96 | ACTEnact Holdings Inc. · Insurance | Whole market | +20.5% | 24.3% | 0.89 | −20.2% | — | 0.26 | — |
| 97 | THGThe Hanover Insurance Group, Inc. · Property & Casualty Insurance | Whole market | +14.4% | 22.9% | 0.70 | −40.1% | +291% | 0.08 | — |
| 98 | DCIDonaldson Company, Inc. · Industrial Machinery | Whole market | +9.5% | 23.4% | 0.51 | −42.7% | +182% | 0.30 | — |
| 99 | FLTWFranklin FTSE Taiwan ETF · Technology | Whole market | +21.8% | 24.3% | 0.94 | −38.0% | — | 0.44 | 0.19% |
| 100 | USMCPrincipal U.S. Mega-Cap ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +14.1% | 16.4% | 0.89 | −30.0% | — | 0.60 | 0.12% |
DLR against its popular alternatives
The investments people most often weigh against DLR, compared period by period and year by year.
How do DLR's risk and return compare with its alternatives?
This map plots each investment's annual return over the past 5 years against its volatility, the size of its typical price swings. Investments toward the upper left earned more for a smoother ride, and those toward the lower right earned less for a rougher one. The dashed lines cross at DLR, which divides the map into what did better or worse on each measure.
- Only MSFT and EQIX were both more rewarding and calmer than DLR over the past 5 years, earning a higher annual return with lower volatility.
- Over the past 5 years, DLR returned 6.3% a year, less than the S&P 500's 12.7%, with higher volatility (29.4% against 17.1%).
Green points earned more than DLR with less volatility; red points earned less with more. Hover over a point for its figures. Total returns with dividends reinvested, annualized.
All figures
| Investment | Annual return | Volatility |
|---|---|---|
| VRT Vertiv Holdings Co | +54.2% | 64.2% |
| IRM Iron Mountain Incorporated | +24.6% | 30.3% |
| ETN Eaton Corporation plc | +20.4% | 32.1% |
| GOOG Alphabet Inc. | +19.0% | 32.0% |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | +12.7% | 17.1% |
| MSFT Microsoft Corporation | +12.5% | 28.2% |
| AMZN Amazon.com, Inc. | +9.0% | 36.6% |
| EQIX Equinix, Inc. | +6.6% | 27.8% |
| DLR This pageDigital Realty Trust, Inc. | +6.3% | 29.4% |
| AMT American Tower Corporation | −4.8% | 27.3% |
| CCI Crown Castle Inc. | −9.9% | 28.3% |
| SBAC SBA Communications Corporation | −10.2% | 30.3% |
| UNIT Uniti Group Inc. | −22.1% | 55.3% |
Has DLR consistently beaten its popular alternatives?
This section compares DLR with the investments people most often weigh against it, checking each one over eight periods from one month to ten years. Counting how often an alternative earned more than DLR helps separate lasting outperformance from a single strong stretch.
- Five of the 11 popular alternatives, led by AMZN, IRM and GOOG, outperformed DLR in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes.
- AMZN and IRM outperformed DLR in every long-term period and in all but one short-term period, the most consistent record in the group.
- IRM, ETN and GOOG earned more for the risk they took than DLR (a higher Sharpe ratio) and fell less in their worst decline of the past 10 years.
A green cell means the alternative earned more than DLR over that period. "Qualified" marks those that did so in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods.
| Investment | Periods outperformed | Short term | Long term | Risk · 5 years | Fund | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1M | 3M | 6M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | 10Y | Volatilitylower is calmer | Sharpehigher is better | Worst declinepast 10 years | Expense | Assets | Overlapsame sectors | ||
| DLR Digital Realty Trust, Inc. (this page) | — | −5.9% | +0.1% | −12.9% | +15.4% | +4.3% | +65.7% | +35.7% | +154% | 29.4% | 0.35 | −48.5% | — | $65B | — |
| AMZN QualifiedAmazon.com, Inc. | 5/5 short3/3 longAll-weather | +1.6% | +5.1% | +5.8% | +16.0% | +21.3% | +110% | +53.8% | +548% | 36.6% | 0.42 | −56.1% | — | $2.8T | — |
| IRM QualifiedIron Mountain Incorporated | 4/5 short3/3 longAll-weather | −3.3% | −8.3% | −4.8% | +38.9% | +10.4% | +110% | +200% | +470% | 30.3% | 0.88 | −39.0% | — | $34B | — |
| GOOG QualifiedAlphabet Inc. | 3/5 short3/3 long | −4.1% | −4.2% | +0.4% | +6.9% | +31.2% | +148% | +138% | +752% | 32.0% | 0.71 | −44.6% | — | $4.1T | — |
| MSFT QualifiedMicrosoft Corporation | 3/5 short2/3 long | +6.0% | +32.5% | +27.7% | +13.2% | +3.8% | +66.6% | +80.3% | +946% | 28.2% | 0.56 | −37.1% | — | $3.9T | — |
| EQIX QualifiedEquinix, Inc. | 3/5 short2/3 long | −6.6% | −2.5% | −9.7% | +31.2% | +22.2% | +49.1% | +37.4% | +226% | 27.8% | 0.37 | −41.8% | — | $97B | — |
| ETN Electrical Equipment & PartsEaton Corporation plc | 2/5 short3/3 long | −12.3% | −4.6% | −5.8% | +17.7% | +2.3% | +104% | +153% | +657% | 32.1% | 0.74 | −44.5% | — | $148B | — |
| VRT Electrical Equipment & PartsVertiv Holdings Co | 2/5 short2/3 long | −18.9% | −30.2% | −35.2% | +16.0% | +16.0% | +456% | +772% | — | 64.2% | 1.01 | −71.3% | — | $78B | — |
| AMT REIT - SpecialtyAmerican Tower Corporation | 3/5 short0/3 long | +6.3% | +11.1% | +3.1% | +8.2% | −1.1% | +27.5% | −21.8% | +107% | 27.3% | -0.04 | −45.4% | — | $86B | — |
| CCI REIT - SpecialtyCrown Castle Inc. | 3/5 short0/3 long | +10.8% | +5.3% | −4.9% | −4.9% | −13.7% | +10.7% | −40.6% | +35.4% | 28.3% | -0.23 | −59.7% | — | $35B | — |
| SBAC REIT - SpecialtySBA Communications Corporation | 1/5 short0/3 long | +2.7% | +0.1% | −16.8% | −4.1% | −6.2% | +0.4% | −41.5% | +79.2% | 30.3% | -0.20 | −55.9% | — | $19B | — |
| UNIT REIT - SpecialtyUniti Group Inc. | 0/5 short0/3 long | −41.8% | −49.7% | −53.8% | −19.3% | −1.6% | −22.8% | −71.3% | −83.6% | 55.3% | -0.18 | −87.0% | — | $1.3B | — |
How did DLR do year by year?
This table shows each investment's total return in every full calendar year since 2005, along with where DLR ranked among its popular alternatives each year. Annual results reveal how consistently each one kept pace with DLR and how far its good and bad years diverged, detail that multiyear averages tend to smooth over.
Note: DLR began trading on October 29, 2004, so the table starts with 2005, its first full calendar year, and cannot show how it fared during the dot-com bust.
- DLR finished ahead of the S&P 500 in 14 of its 21 full calendar years.
- Among its popular alternatives, VRT came out ahead of DLR most often, in five of the seven years both traded.
- Ranked against its popular alternatives each year, DLR finished in the top quarter in six of 21 years and in the bottom quarter in four. In 2025, it ranked 9 of 12.
Newest year first. Green marks a year in which the fund came out ahead of DLR; gray means the two finished within a fraction of a point. The rank row places DLR among the alternatives that traded the full year; dark green is the top quarter and red the bottom quarter.
| Investment | Years ahead of DLR | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DLR This pageDigital Realty Trust, Inc. | — | −10.1% | +35.9% | +39.9% | −41.0% | +30.7% | +20.4% | +16.5% | −3.0% | +18.7% | +34.9% | +20.2% | +42.6% | −23.5% | +6.1% | +35.4% | +6.1% | +58.8% | −11.4% | +15.7% | +57.2% | +77.9% |
| Rank among alternatives | Top quarter in 6 of 21 | 9 of 12 | 5 of 12 | 7 of 12 | 9 of 12 | 9 of 12 | 8 of 12 | 9 of 12 | 8 of 11 | 10 of 11 | 2 of 11 | 5 of 10 | 1 of 10 | 10 of 10 | 9 of 10 | 1 of 10 | 7 of 10 | 7 of 10 | 1 of 10 | 9 of 10 | 2 of 10 | 3 of 10 |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 7 of 21 | +17.7% | +24.9% | +26.2% | −18.2% | +28.7% | +18.3% | +31.2% | −4.6% | +21.7% | +12.0% | +1.2% | +13.5% | +32.3% | +16.0% | +1.9% | +15.1% | +26.4% | −36.8% | +5.1% | +15.9% | +4.8% |
| AMZN Amazon.com, Inc. | 13 of 21 | +5.2% | +44.4% | +80.9% | −49.6% | +2.4% | +76.3% | +23.0% | +28.4% | +56.0% | +10.9% | +118% | −22.2% | +59.0% | +45.0% | −3.9% | +33.7% | +163% | −44.7% | +135% | −16.5% | +6.8% |
| IRM Iron Mountain Incorporated | 9 of 21 | −18.3% | +54.5% | +46.5% | −0.1% | +87.8% | +1.0% | +5.9% | −8.0% | +23.6% | +27.4% | −25.7% | +33.9% | +1.1% | +15.6% | +26.5% | +11.4% | −8.0% | −33.2% | +34.4% | −2.1% | +38.4% |
| GOOG Alphabet Inc. | 14 of 21 | +65.4% | +35.6% | +58.8% | −38.7% | +65.2% | +31.0% | +29.1% | −1.0% | +35.6% | +1.7% | +44.5% | −6.0% | +58.5% | +9.5% | +8.8% | −4.2% | +101% | −55.5% | +50.2% | +11.1% | +115% |
| MSFT Microsoft Corporation | 11 of 21 | +15.6% | +12.9% | +58.2% | −28.0% | +52.5% | +42.5% | +57.6% | +20.8% | +40.8% | +15.1% | +22.7% | +27.5% | +44.3% | +5.8% | −4.5% | −6.5% | +60.5% | −44.4% | +20.8% | +15.8% | −1.0% |
| EQIX Equinix, Inc. | 10 of 21 | −16.9% | +19.4% | +25.4% | −21.1% | +20.3% | +24.2% | +68.9% | −20.4% | +29.2% | +20.7% | +42.3% | +32.8% | −13.9% | +103% | +24.8% | −23.4% | +99.6% | −47.4% | +33.7% | +85.5% | −4.6% |
| ETN Eaton Corporation plc | 12 of 21 | −2.8% | +39.5% | +56.2% | −7.2% | +46.7% | +31.0% | +42.8% | −10.0% | +21.5% | +33.8% | −20.7% | −8.2% | +44.2% | +28.6% | −11.8% | +64.0% | +33.3% | −47.1% | +31.6% | +14.4% | −5.4% |
| VRT Vertiv Holdings Co | 5 of 7 | +42.8% | +137% | +252% | −45.3% | +33.8% | +69.4% | +12.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| AMT American Tower Corporation | 9 of 21 | −0.9% | −12.2% | +5.4% | −25.7% | +32.9% | −0.5% | +47.9% | +13.3% | +37.7% | +11.2% | 0.0% | +25.8% | +4.8% | +30.4% | +16.9% | +19.5% | +47.3% | −31.2% | +14.3% | +37.5% | +47.2% |
| CCI Crown Castle Inc. | 11 of 21 | +3.0% | −16.4% | −10.2% | −32.6% | +35.1% | +15.5% | +35.4% | +1.8% | +33.0% | +4.5% | +14.4% | +9.9% | +1.8% | +61.0% | +2.2% | +12.3% | +122% | −57.8% | +28.8% | +20.0% | +61.8% |
| SBAC SBA Communications Corporation | 12 of 21 | −3.1% | −18.2% | −8.2% | −27.3% | +39.0% | +17.8% | +49.3% | −0.9% | +58.2% | −1.7% | −5.1% | +23.3% | +26.6% | +65.2% | +4.9% | +19.9% | +109% | −51.8% | +23.1% | +53.6% | +93.0% |
| UNIT Uniti Group Inc. | 2 of 10 | −23.3% | −4.8% | +12.8% | −58.8% | +22.8% | +42.9% | −45.8% | −2.8% | −22.8% | +41.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Risk and diversification
How DLR has fallen, how it held up in crashes beside the S&P 500 and its popular alternatives, and what moves independently of it.
What were DLR's worst declines?
A drawdown is the decline from a peak to the lowest point before a new high. This section presents DLR's five deepest drawdowns since it began trading in 2004, alongside the S&P 500's return over the same dates, and how long each took to recover. Together, these figures show how much an investor could have lost and how long it took to get back to even.
Note: DLR began trading on October 29, 2004, so this list cannot include the dot-com bust. The crash tests on this page show how older funds and the S&P 500 fared through those years.
- In all five of DLR's worst declines, the S&P 500 held up better over the same dates.
- Not every decline was the market's doing: DLR fell 41.1% from July 2012 to December 2013, while the S&P 500 rose 35.4%.
- The longest climb back to a previous high took 14 months, after DLR fell 48.5% from December 2021 to May 2023.
Green means DLR fell less than the S&P 500 over the same dates. Based on daily closing prices with dividends reinvested.
| During | DLR fell | S&P 500, same dates | Peak | Low | Time to the low | Back at the peak | Time to recover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 financial crisis | −56.8% | −39.2% | Sep 2008 | Nov 2008 | 2 months | Nov 2009 | 12 months |
| 2022 bear market | −48.5% | −11.7% | Dec 2021 | May 2023 | 17 months | Jul 2024 | 14 months |
| No named crash | −41.1% | +35.4% | Jul 2012 | Dec 2013 | 17 months | Jan 2015 | 13 months |
| No named crash | −29.4% | −17.1% | Nov 2024 | Apr 2025 | 5 months | Apr 2026 | 12 months |
| 2008 financial crisis | −26.5% | −16.8% | Oct 2007 | Mar 2008 | 5 months | Jun 2008 | 3 months |
How did DLR do in stock market crashes?
This section measures how far DLR, the S&P 500 and each alternative fell from peak to trough during every major market crash since 2000. A smaller decline means an investment held up better, and comparing results across crashes shows whether that resilience was consistent or a one-off.
Note: DLR began trading on October 29, 2004, so its row reads "Not yet trading" for the dot-com bust. The older alternatives and the S&P 500 show how those crashes played out.
- Among its popular alternatives, IRM held up best, falling less than DLR in five of the nine crashes they both traded through.
- DLR began trading after the dot-com bust, but seven of its popular alternatives lived through it. The mildest fall among them was ETN's 31.6%, against 47.5% for the S&P 500.
- DLR fell further than the S&P 500 in four of the nine crashes it has traded through. The clearest case was the 2022 bear market, when DLR fell 45.7% and the S&P 500 fell 24.5%.
Newest crash first. Each figure is the fund's deepest fall within the crash window; green means a smaller fall than DLR.
| Investment | Held up better | 2023 regional bank crisisMar 2023 | 2022 bear marketJan 2022 | Covid crashFeb 2020 | Late-2018 sell-offSep 2018 | February 2018 volatility shockFeb 2018 | 2015 China and oil sell-offAug 2015 | 2011 euro debt crisisJul 2011 | 2010 flash crashMay 2010 | 2008 financial crisisOct 2007 | Dot-com bustMar 2000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DLR This pageDigital Realty Trust, Inc. | — | −3.1% | −45.7% | −24.1% | −14.6% | −8.1% | −8.4% | −20.2% | −1.7% | −56.8% | Not yet trading |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 4 of 9 | −3.4% | −24.5% | −33.7% | −19.3% | −6.5% | −12.8% | −17.9% | −1.5% | −55.2% | −47.5% |
| AMZN Amazon.com, Inc. | 3 of 9 | −3.4% | −39.6% | −22.7% | −33.2% | −7.1% | −30.6% | −20.7% | −2.9% | −65.3% | −91.8% |
| IRM Iron Mountain Incorporated | 5 of 9 | −4.7% | −22.6% | −33.4% | −15.1% | −4.7% | −22.6% | −19.5% | 0.0% | −55.7% | −34.9% |
| GOOG Alphabet Inc. | 2 of 9 | −3.9% | −35.0% | −30.8% | −18.9% | −9.9% | −12.7% | −21.1% | −1.1% | −65.3% | — |
| MSFT Microsoft Corporation | 4 of 9 | −2.0% | −31.0% | −27.7% | −18.2% | −7.4% | −14.4% | −14.1% | −2.6% | −57.9% | −62.9% |
| EQIX Equinix, Inc. | 3 of 9 | −4.1% | −36.3% | −25.1% | −22.8% | −6.3% | −15.8% | −22.5% | −1.1% | −69.9% | — |
| ETN Eaton Corporation plc | 2 of 9 | −4.5% | −26.3% | −44.5% | −26.0% | −6.7% | −22.3% | −34.6% | −1.4% | −68.5% | −31.6% |
| VRT Vertiv Holdings Co | 1 of 4 | −12.2% | −65.7% | −58.6% | −3.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| AMT American Tower Corporation | 4 of 9 | −2.3% | −34.2% | −28.8% | −8.4% | −8.0% | −19.2% | −13.6% | −2.9% | −56.5% | −98.7% |
| CCI Crown Castle Inc. | 5 of 9 | −2.4% | −34.5% | −29.8% | −10.7% | −7.4% | −11.1% | −11.9% | −2.1% | −76.1% | −97.6% |
| SBAC SBA Communications Corporation | 4 of 9 | −3.9% | −34.1% | −28.8% | −8.7% | −7.8% | −33.6% | −15.8% | −0.6% | −72.2% | −99.6% |
| UNIT Uniti Group Inc. | 1 of 6 | −5.2% | −51.9% | −52.4% | −27.1% | −6.2% | −32.6% | — | — | — | — |
How closely does DLR move with the S&P 500?
Upside capture measures how much of the S&P 500's gains an investment kept in the months the market rose, and downside capture how much of its losses it took in the months the market fell. An investment that captures more of the gains than the losses has compounded ahead of the market over time. This section compares DLR with its popular alternatives on both measures, and on beta (how strongly each has moved with the market), over the past 10 years.
- Over the past 10 years, DLR captured 64% of the S&P 500's gains in rising months and 64% of its losses in falling months, with a beta of 0.60. That is a defensive profile: it gave up some of the market's upside in exchange for smaller losses.
- Five of the ten popular alternatives had a higher capture ratio (upside capture divided by downside capture) than DLR's 1.00, led by ETN, MSFT and GOOG.
Monthly total returns over the past 10 years, measured against SPY. 100% capture or a beta of 1.00 means moving in line with the S&P 500. Green marks a better figure than DLR's: more upside, less downside or a higher capture ratio. Sorted by capture ratio.
| Investment | Upside capture | Downside capture | Capture ratio | Beta |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DLR This pageDigital Realty Trust, Inc. | 64% | 64% | 1.00 | 0.60 |
| ETN Eaton Corporation plc | 114% | 80% | 1.43 | 1.16 |
| MSFT Microsoft Corporation | 127% | 91% | 1.39 | 0.96 |
| GOOG Alphabet Inc. | 132% | 110% | 1.20 | 1.12 |
| IRM Iron Mountain Incorporated | 98% | 83% | 1.18 | 0.99 |
| EQIX Equinix, Inc. | 76% | 66% | 1.14 | 0.67 |
| AMZN Amazon.com, Inc. | 134% | 139% | 0.96 | 1.31 |
| AMT American Tower Corporation | 61% | 79% | 0.78 | 0.60 |
| SBAC SBA Communications Corporation | 55% | 79% | 0.70 | 0.64 |
| CCI Crown Castle Inc. | 54% | 101% | 0.53 | 0.70 |
| UNIT Uniti Group Inc. | 47% | 186% | 0.25 | 1.20 |
What diversifies DLR?
Correlation measures how closely two investments move together, on a scale from 1 (in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to -1 (in opposite directions). This section lists large ETFs and stocks whose returns have had a low correlation with DLR's. Because such investments tend not to fall at the same time, pairing DLR with them can reduce a portfolio's overall swings.
- Moving a fifth of the money in DLR into LVHI would have cut the portfolio's volatility by 17% over the past 5 years and raised its annual return (+7.6% for DLR alone, +9.9% for the mix).
- FIX made money in four of the five calendar years in which DLR lost money.
- Among large ETFs, LVHI, DXJ and EMLP have moved largely independently of DLR over the past 5 years, with correlations of 0.46 or lower, and each still earned a positive 5-year return.
Only ETFs with at least $1.0B in assets and stocks worth at least $10B, with a correlation below 0.5 over the past 5 years and a positive return, are included, ranked by Sharpe ratio; funds that hold the same thing are shown once. The year columns are the years in which DLR lost money. The last two columns show a portfolio that is 80% DLR and 20% the other investment, rebalanced monthly.
ETFs
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2025 | 2022 | 2018 | 2013 | 2008 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DLR Digital Realty Trust, Inc. (this page) | 1.00 | +35.7% | 0.35 | −10.1% | −41.0% | −3.0% | −23.5% | −11.4% | 25.6% | +7.6% |
| LVHI InternationalFranklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 0.38 | +119% | 1.48 | +27.1% | +3.8% | −5.2% | — | — | 21.2% | +9.9% |
| DXJ InternationalWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund | 0.36 | +225% | 1.34 | +32.8% | +6.0% | −19.8% | +41.3% | −20.8% | 21.5% | +11.7% |
| EMLP Broad MarketFirst Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund | 0.46 | +101% | 1.04 | +9.7% | +10.4% | −8.7% | +16.6% | — | 21.9% | +9.6% |
| HDV Dividend & IncomeiShares Core High Dividend ETF | 0.33 | +83.3% | 1.00 | +11.9% | +7.1% | −3.0% | +23.8% | — | 21.5% | +9.0% |
| SMH TechnologyVanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.48 | +323% | 0.97 | +49.2% | −33.5% | −9.1% | +33.4% | −44.7% | 24.5% | +13.9% |
| DBEF InternationalXtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF | 0.48 | +85.0% | 0.96 | +23.1% | −5.1% | −9.5% | +26.4% | — | 21.6% | +9.2% |
| GLD CommoditiesSPDR Gold Shares | 0.18 | +126% | 0.96 | +63.7% | −0.8% | −1.9% | −28.3% | +4.9% | 21.3% | +10.3% |
| SPMO Broad MarketInvesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 0.41 | +136% | 0.93 | +26.6% | −10.4% | −0.9% | — | — | 22.4% | +10.8% |
Stocks
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2025 | 2022 | 2018 | 2013 | 2008 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DLR Digital Realty Trust, Inc. (this page) | 1.00 | +35.7% | 0.35 | −10.1% | −41.0% | −3.0% | −23.5% | −11.4% | 25.6% | +7.6% |
| CAH Medical - DistributionCardinal Health, Inc. | 0.13 | +479% | 1.55 | +76.3% | +54.1% | −24.5% | +66.0% | −39.6% | 21.8% | +14.1% |
| CLS Hardware, Equipment & PartsCelestica Inc. | 0.42 | +3,143% | 1.47 | +220% | +1.3% | −16.3% | +27.6% | −20.5% | 27.5% | +25.7% |
| FIX Engineering & ConstructionComfort Systems USA, Inc. | 0.47 | +1,636% | 1.46 | +121% | +17.0% | +0.8% | +61.7% | −15.2% | 25.9% | +21.9% |
| MCK Medical - DistributionMcKesson Corporation | 0.22 | +413% | 1.44 | +44.5% | +51.8% | −28.4% | +67.7% | −40.4% | 22.1% | +13.4% |
| MPC Oil & Gas Refining & MarketingMarathon Petroleum Corporation | 0.14 | +690% | 1.41 | +19.2% | +86.6% | −8.2% | +48.6% | — | 22.3% | +16.1% |
Common questions
What was DLR's worst drawdown?
DLR's deepest decline since it began trading in 2004 was 56.8%, from September to November 2008. It took 12 months from the low to climb back to its old high. Because DLR launched in October 2004, that record does not include the dot-com bust.
What were DLR's best and worst years?
Over 21 full calendar years, DLR's best year was 2005, when it returned 77.9%. Its worst was 2022, with a return of -41.0%.
Is there a better investment than DLR?
Among DLR's popular alternatives, MSFT earned more for the risk it took than DLR over the past 5 years, and its worst fall in 10 years was 37.1%, against 48.5% for DLR. Looking beyond its popular alternatives, CIBR (cybersecurity) and LAMR (specialty reits) earned more than DLR with less volatility over the past 5 years. CIBR returned 14.1% a year at 26.1% volatility, against 6.3% a year at 29.4%.
Is DLR more volatile than the S&P 500?
Yes. DLR's volatility over the past 5 years was 29.4%, 1.7 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, DLR's return lands within 29.4% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump.
What is DLR's Sharpe ratio?
DLR's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.35, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so DLR earned less for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings.
How correlated is DLR with the S&P 500?
Over the past 5 years, DLR's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.61 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They often move together: some diversification next to an index fund, but not a cushion. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against DLR instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a DLR holding.
What are the best alternatives to DLR?
Of the 11 popular alternatives we compared, five outperformed DLR in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes, with dividends reinvested: AMZN, IRM and GOOG.
Did DLR outperform the S&P 500?
DLR finished ahead of the S&P 500 (SPY) in 14 of 21 full calendar years. In 2025, it returned -10.1%, against +17.7% for the index.
How did DLR do in stock market crashes?
DLR fell less than the S&P 500 (SPY) in three of the nine major crashes it has traded through, and further in four. The clearest case was the 2022 bear market, when DLR fell 45.7% and the S&P 500 fell 24.5%.
What diversifies DLR?
These had a low correlation with DLR over the past 5 years and still earned a positive 5-year return: among large ETFs, LVHI (correlation 0.38), DXJ (correlation 0.36) and EMLP (correlation 0.46); among large stocks, CAH (correlation 0.13), CLS (correlation 0.42) and FIX (correlation 0.47). A correlation near zero means the two have moved largely independently.
How we measure
- Short-term periods are 1M, 3M, 6M, YTD, 1Y; long-term periods are 3Y, 5Y, 10Y. An investment outperformed in a period when its total return, with dividends reinvested, was higher than DLR's. Returns within 0.5 points or 3% of DLR's, whichever is larger, count as a tie.
- "Qualified" means outperforming in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods. "All-weather" means outperforming in every long-term period and all but one short-term period.
- Popular alternatives are the funds and stocks most often compared with this one. We include only those that trade today, are not leveraged or inverse, and hold at least $200 million.
- Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily returns over 5 years, a measure of how much the price typically swings in a year. The Sharpe ratio is the return above cash for each unit of that volatility.
- A decline, or drawdown, runs from a peak to the lowest close before the next high. The worst decline ever uses all the price history we have; comparisons between funds use the past 10 years so that younger funds are judged on the same stretch.
- Sector overlap is the share of assets two funds hold in the same sectors. Correlation and the mixed-portfolio figures use monthly returns.
- Upside and downside capture follow Morningstar's definition: the compound monthly return in the months the S&P 500 rose (or fell), divided by the S&P 500's compound return in those months. Beta measures how strongly monthly returns have moved with the S&P 500. All three use the same window for every investment.
- Figures are computed from daily adjusted prices and update after each trading day. Past performance does not predict future results.