Relative Intelligence · Biotechnology

How Moderna (MRNA) compares with the whole market and its popular alternatives
Built by QuantCommons' quantitative engine, this page is about relative opportunity, not data on MRNA alone. It places MRNA (Moderna, Inc.) against 19 popular alternatives, its neighboring categories and the entire market of over 10,000 U.S.-listed stocks and ETFs, and surfaces what has done better on consistent outperformance, return for the risk taken, behavior in real market crashes and diversification. The result is a clearer view of where MRNA stands in the market, and of the alternatives worth a closer look.
Period covered: MRNA's full trading record, from December 2018 through September 2026. The crash tests reach back to 2000 using older funds and the S&P 500. All returns include reinvested dividends. Data as of October 20, 2026.
Data as of October 20, 2026. Full tables and charts read best on a larger screen.
On this page12 sections
Key findings
- Right nowOver the past 6 months, MRNA rose 343% against 9.1% for the S&P 500 and 11.2% for the Nasdaq 100. On the flip side, the slide is MRNA's own: it is 50.0% below its high, against 1.3% for the S&P 500. At a glance ↓
- Stock or market?MRNA held up far better than its industry: it rose 40.0% over the past month while the biotechnology ETF XBI (State Street SPDR S&P Biotech ETF) fell 3.2%. The S&P 500 fell 0.6%. Last month cut against the tape: MRNA rose 40.0% while the S&P 500 fell 0.6%.
- Past 1 to 3 yearsMRNA has run far ahead of the market, rising 789% over the past year against 15.8% for the S&P 500 and 17.9% for the Nasdaq 100. The same gap shows up over 3 years (201% against 89.3%). A behind 73% of stocks worth at least $300 million over 5 years, but ahead of 87% of the stocks worth at least $300 million over 3 years. By year ↓
- Long termMRNA turned $10,000 into $7,270 over the past 5 years, against $18,200 in the S&P 500. Growth of $10,000 ↓
- In a crashThe 2022 bear market took 49.9% off MRNA, against 24.5% for the S&P 500. That was more than AMGN (Amgen, 11.9%) but less than NVAX (Novavax, 88.2%). Crash tests ↓
- DiversificationAgainst the S&P 500, MRNA has a correlation of 0.18 over 5 years, less closely than 88% of stocks worth at least $300 million. Next to an index fund it is a real diversifier. That said, over 5 years, MRNA's beta versus the S&P 500 was 1.09: in the S&P 500's rising months it gained 49% as much as the index, and in falling months it lost 1.7 times as much. Market capture ↓
- Better options
- Popular alternatives
- GILD (Gilead Sciences), AMGN (Amgen) and VRTX (Vertex Pharmaceuticals) earned more than MRNA with less volatility over the past 5 years. GILD returned 22.8% a year at 24.9% volatility, against a loss of 6.2% a year at 104%.
- Nearby categories and themes
- LLY (Eli Lilly and Company, pharmaceuticals) and JNJ (Johnson & Johnson, pharmaceuticals) earned more than MRNA with less volatility over the past 5 years. LLY returned 40.7% a year at 32.8% volatility, against a loss of 6.2% a year at 104%.
- Whole market
- 2,890 of the 3,634 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than MRNA with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them NVDA (NVIDIA), AAPL (Apple) and GOOG (Alphabet).
How much would $10,000 in MRNA have grown?
This chart tracks a hypothetical $10,000 investment in MRNA over the past 7 years, with dividends reinvested, alongside the same amount in the S&P 500, investments that ended ahead of MRNA over the same span and MRNA's popular alternatives, among those that traded for the entire period. A second view covers the past 5 years, the period the better options further down the page are judged on. It shows not only where each investment ended up but also how smooth or uneven the path was.
Note: MRNA began trading on December 7, 2018, so the chart cannot reach back to the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or four other sell-offs. It covers the most recent 7 years of MRNA's record, starting at the end of September 2019.
- $10,000 invested in MRNA at the end of September 2019 would have grown to $120,962 by September 2026, more than the $28,402 it would have become in SPY, an S&P 500 fund.
- Five of the eight other investments on the chart ended ahead of MRNA, and NVDA finished highest, at $528,672.
Choose a period
From the end of September 2019 to the end of September 2026. The scale is logarithmic, so equal steps up the chart are equal percentage gains. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 53 of the 3,144 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of MRNA; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- NVDA$528,672+5,187% total · +76.3% a year
- CLS$504,080+4,941% total · +75.1% a year
- FIX$388,188+3,782% total · +68.7% a year
- MU$254,900+2,449% total · +58.8% a year
- AVGO$150,215+1,402% total · +47.3% a year
- MRNA$120,962+1,110% total · +42.8% a year
- EXEL$33,036+230% total · +18.6% a year
- VRTX$30,858+209% total · +17.5% a year
- GILD$30,462+205% total · +17.2% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$28,402+184% total · +16.1% a year
From the end of September 2021 to the end of September 2026. The scale is logarithmic, so equal steps up the chart are equal percentage gains. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 3,249 of the 3,628 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of MRNA; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- VRTX$28,822+188% total · +23.6% a year
- EXEL$27,629+176% total · +22.5% a year
- GILD$25,496+155% total · +20.6% a year
- AMGN$23,160+132% total · +18.3% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$19,000+90.0% total · +13.7% a year
- INCY$17,643+76.4% total · +12.0% a year
- GSK$15,444+54.4% total · +9.1% a year
- IONS$13,313+33.1% total · +5.9% a year
- REGN$12,649+26.5% total · +4.8% a year
- MRNA$5,004−50.0% total · −12.9% a year
MRNA at a glance
This section summarizes the key facts about the stock, its returns over periods from one to ten years and the risk it has carried, with dividends reinvested throughout. These figures serve as the baseline for every comparison that follows.
Note: MRNA began trading on December 7, 2018, so every figure here, including its worst decline, covers only the time since then. None of them reflect the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or four other sell-offs.
- MRNA is still 50.0% below its all-time high.
- MRNA's deepest decline since it began trading in 2018 was 95.4%, from August 2021 to November 2025. It has not yet climbed back to that peak.
- Over seven full calendar years, MRNA's best was 2020, when it returned 434%, and its worst was 2024, when it lost 58.2%. It lost money in four of those years.
The company
- Market value
- $97B
- Industry
- Biotechnology
- Price history from
- December 2018
Returns
- Past 1 year
- +789%total return
- Past 3 years
- +201%+44.4% a year
- Past 5 years
- −27.3%−6.2% a year
- Best calendar year
- +434%2020
- Worst calendar year
- −58.2%2024
- Losing years
- 4 of 7full calendar years
Risk
- Volatility
- 104%typical yearly swing, 5 years
- Sharpe ratio
- 0.30return per unit of risk, 5 years
- Worst decline ever
- −95.4%Aug 2021 to Nov 2025
- From its all-time high
- −50.0%below the peak
MRNA against the whole market
Where MRNA ranks among every stock and fund, and what across the market has done better.
How does MRNA rank among all stocks?
This section ranks MRNA on return, volatility, risk-adjusted return and worst decline against every stock worth at least $300 million with enough history. Where the comparisons with its popular alternatives show how MRNA stacks up against its peers, these rankings show where it stands in the market as a whole.
- MRNA's 1-year return ranks in the top 1% of the 3,287 stocks worth at least $300 million with 1 year of history.
- MRNA is among the more volatile stocks: its price swings rank in the bottom 3% of the 2,893 stocks worth at least $300 million, where the top is the calmest.
Ranked against U.S.-listed stocks worth at least $300M that have enough history for each measure, so the count changes from row to row; smaller stocks are left out. Lower volatility and smaller declines rank higher.
| Measure | MRNA | Rank | Standing |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +789% | 2 of 3,287 | top 1% |
| 3-year return | +201% | 403 of 3,017 | top 13% |
| 5-year return | −27.3% | 2,105 of 2,893 | bottom 28% |
| Volatility, 5 years | 104% | 2,803 of 2,893 | bottom 4% |
| Sharpe ratio, 5 years | 0.30 | 1,540 of 2,893 | bottom 48% |
What has beaten MRNA on both return and risk?
Each dot is an investment, placed by how much it earned a year over the past 5 years (higher is better) and how much its price swung, its volatility (further left is calmer). MRNA sits where the dashed lines cross. Anything in the green box above and to the left earned more than MRNA with smaller swings, a better trade-off over this period on both counts. Past results are no promise, but a name in the box is worth a closer look.
- 1,900 stocks and 990 ETFs worth at least $500 million sit in the green region: each earned more than MRNA over the past 5 years with smaller price swings. That is 80% of the 3,634 screened.
- Among those with at least half MRNA's swings, CLS has the best return for its risk: 101% a year at 59.7% volatility, 43% less than MRNA's 104%, and a Sharpe ratio (return above cash per unit of volatility) of 1.47 against 0.30 for MRNA.
- Among MRNA's popular alternatives, GILD, VRTX and AMGN are in the region. GILD earned 22.8% a year against a loss of 6.2% a year for MRNA, at 24.9% volatility, 76% less than MRNA's 104%.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested, and volatility the annualized swing in daily prices, both over 5 years. Labeled dots are the strongest picks from the table below and the names called out above, colored by how close they sit to MRNA; faint dots are 86 more of the 2,890 in the green region (the strongest, one per fund family). 3,634 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million were screened. Hover over a dot for its figures.
- Popular alternatives
- Same and neighboring categories, and shared themes
- The whole market
- Others in the green region
Is there a better investment than MRNA?
Investments that beat MRNA over the past 5 years on return, volatility, drawdowns, consistency, crash losses or fees, from its popular alternatives out to the whole market.
- Among MRNA's popular alternatives, GILD, AMGN and VRTX earned more than MRNA with less volatility over the past 5 years. GILD returned 22.8% a year at 24.9% volatility, against a loss of 6.2% a year at 104%.
- Looking beyond its popular alternatives, LLY (pharmaceuticals) and JNJ (pharmaceuticals) earned more than MRNA with less volatility over the past 5 years. LLY returned 40.7% a year at 32.8% volatility, against a loss of 6.2% a year at 104%.
- Across the whole market, 2,890 of the 3,634 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than MRNA with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them NVDA, AAPL and GOOG.
How this works
The table below lists investments that beat MRNA over the past 5 years on at least one of these measures: a higher annual return with lower volatility, a higher annual return at similar volatility, a similar return with lower volatility, a higher Sharpe ratio with a smaller worst decline, a higher total return in most periods from 3 months to 10 years, or smaller losses in recent market crashes. It checks MRNA's popular alternatives first, then the rest of its own and neighboring categories, then every stock and fund worth at least $500 million, and shows the strongest few in each group. The full list of those with a higher return and lower volatility than MRNA follows the table.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested. Annual return, volatility and the Sharpe ratio cover 5 years; the worst decline covers the past 10 years. Green marks a better figure than MRNA's. "On the frontier" means no other option shown or tested earned more with less volatility. Funds that hold the same thing are shown once. Beyond the popular alternatives, nothing with more than 1.5× MRNA's volatility counts as better.
These figures cover the past 5 years. Green marks a better figure than MRNA's.
| Investment | Why it is better | Past 5 years | Downside | Long run | Fit | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Annual return?higher is better | Volatility?lower is calmer | Sharpe?return per unit of risk | Worst decline?past 10 years | 5Y returntotal | Corr. with MRNA?lower diversifies more | Expenseper year | |||
| −6.2% | 104% | 0.30 | −95.4% | −27.3% | 1.00 | — | |||
| +12.7% | 17.1% | 0.79 | −33.7% | +81.7% | 0.18 | 0.09% | |||
| Popular alternativesbest 6 shownThe investments people most often weigh against MRNA. 15 of 19 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineSmaller losses in recent crashes | +22.8% | 24.9% | 0.95 | −30.5% | +180% | 0.26 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineSmaller losses in recent crashes | +19.6% | 24.9% | 0.85 | −24.9% | +145% | 0.36 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineSmaller losses in recent crashes | +22.6% | 29.1% | 0.85 | −41.6% | +177% | 0.31 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineSmaller losses in recent crashes | +9.5% | 24.5% | 0.49 | −37.6% | +57.2% | 0.10 | — | ||
INCYIncyte Corporation · Biotechnology | Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineSmaller losses in recent crashes | +12.2% | 30.1% | 0.53 | −66.5% | +77.6% | 0.22 | — | |
BMRNBioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc. · Biotechnology | Similar return, lower volatilitySmaller losses in recent crashes | −5.6% | 33.0% | -0.01 | −62.1% | −24.9% | 0.13 | — | |
| Same and neighboring categories, and shared themesbest 6 shownEverything else in Biotechnology and the categories next to it (Pharmaceuticals, Life Sciences Tools, Contract Research), plus MRNA's specific themes. 65 of 82 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineSmaller losses in recent crashes | +40.7% | 32.8% | 1.21 | −34.5% | +451% | 0.01 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineSmaller losses in recent crashes | +12.7% | 17.9% | 0.76 | −27.4% | +82.1% | 0.23 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineSmaller losses in recent crashes | +17.1% | 20.7% | 0.87 | −26.8% | +121% | 0.07 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineSmaller losses in recent crashes | +16.3% | 24.8% | 0.74 | −43.4% | +113% | 0.30 | — | ||
IBRXImmunityBio, Inc. · Biotechnology | Higher return, similar volatility | +0.2% | 114% | 0.56 | −97.0% | +1.2% | 0.25 | — | |
CRLCharles River Laboratories International, Inc. · Life Sciences Tools | Similar return, lower volatility | −5.6% | 43.9% | 0.09 | −78.2% | −25.1% | 0.45 | — | |
| The whole marketbest 8 shownEvery other stock and fund worth at least $500 million. 2,927 of 3,534 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| On the frontierHigher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineSmaller losses in recent crashes | +3.7% | 0.3% | 14.05 | −0.2% | +19.9% | 0.01 | 0.14% | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineSmaller losses in recent crashes | +12.5% | 28.2% | 0.56 | −37.1% | +80.3% | 0.02 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineSmaller losses in recent crashes | +9.0% | 36.6% | 0.42 | −56.1% | +53.8% | -0.05 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineSmaller losses in recent crashes | +20.8% | 22.6% | 0.96 | −25.7% | +158% | -0.08 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineSmaller losses in recent crashes | +33.1% | 25.9% | 1.24 | −62.3% | +318% | -0.06 | — | ||
VRIGInvesco Variable Rate Investment Grade ETF · Bonds | On the frontierHigher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineSmaller losses in recent crashes | +4.7% | 1.3% | 3.51 | −13.1% | +25.6% | 0.00 | 0.30% | |
SYMSymbotic Inc. · Industrial Machinery | Higher return, similar volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +32.0% | 105% | 0.73 | −72.5% | +300% | 0.04 | — | |
ZTOZTO Express (Cayman) Inc. · Freight & Logistics | Similar return, lower volatilitySmaller losses in recent crashes | −6.3% | 38.2% | 0.02 | −57.1% | −27.7% | -0.07 | — | |
What these numbers mean for MRNA
- Annual return
- MRNA lost 6.2% a year over the past 5 years with dividends reinvested, against 12.7% a year for the S&P 500. At that pace, $10,000 became about $7,270. Annual return is the steady yearly rate that would produce the same total result, so investments held over the same span compare fairly. Guide: What is performance and return? →
- Volatility
- MRNA's volatility over the past 5 years was 104%, 6.1 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, MRNA's return lands within 104% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump. Guide: Understanding and measuring risk (volatility) →
- Sharpe ratio
- MRNA's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.30, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so MRNA earned less for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings. Guide: Balancing reward with risk (Sharpe ratio) →
- Worst decline
- MRNA's worst fall from a peak to a low over the past 10 years was 95.4%, against 33.7% for the S&P 500. Losses and gains are not symmetric: climbing back from a 95.4% fall takes a 2,065% gain. Guide: Market crash risk and tail risk →
- Correlation
- Over the past 5 years, MRNA's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.18 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They are only loosely linked, which makes it a real diversifier next to an index fund. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against MRNA instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a MRNA holding. Guide: Correlation and diversification →
Show all 2,890 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that earned more than MRNA with less volatility
Out of 3,634 tested over 5 years. The strongest 100 are listed, best first, with funds that hold the same thing listed once.
| # | Investment | Found in | Annual return | Volatility | Sharpe | Worst decline | 5Y return | Corr. with MRNA | Expense |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Whole market | +3.7% | 0.3% | 14.05 | −0.2% | +19.9% | 0.01 | 0.14% | |
| 2 | Whole market | +12.5% | 28.2% | 0.56 | −37.1% | +80.3% | 0.02 | — | |
| 3 | Whole market | +9.0% | 36.6% | 0.42 | −56.1% | +53.8% | -0.05 | — | |
| 4 | Whole market | +20.8% | 22.6% | 0.96 | −25.7% | +158% | -0.08 | — | |
| 5 | Whole market | +33.1% | 25.9% | 1.24 | −62.3% | +318% | -0.06 | — | |
| 6 | VRIGInvesco Variable Rate Investment Grade ETF · Bonds | Whole market | +4.7% | 1.3% | 3.51 | −13.1% | +25.6% | 0.00 | 0.30% |
| 7 | Whole market | +17.4% | 22.9% | 0.82 | −31.4% | +123% | 0.08 | — | |
| 8 | FLRTPacer Aristotle Pacific Floating Rate High Income ETF · Financials | Whole market | +6.0% | 2.3% | 2.55 | −21.0% | +33.9% | 0.04 | 0.60% |
| 9 | Whole market | +17.7% | 18.9% | 0.96 | −26.4% | +126% | 0.19 | 0.40% | |
| 10 | Whole market | +21.3% | 25.6% | 0.89 | −30.3% | +162% | -0.08 | — | |
| 11 | FLOTiShares Floating Rate Bond ETF · Floating Rate Bonds | Whole market | +4.5% | 1.8% | 2.48 | −13.5% | +24.5% | -0.02 | 0.15% |
| 12 | Whole market | +24.2% | 22.8% | 1.07 | −32.4% | +195% | 0.05 | — | |
| 13 | Whole market | +2.7% | 2.9% | 0.94 | −6.3% | +14.0% | 0.07 | 0.03% | |
| 14 | Whole market | +17.2% | 24.9% | 0.77 | −30.4% | +121% | 0.00 | — | |
| 15 | Whole market | +5.2% | 8.9% | 0.61 | −25.4% | +28.5% | -0.01 | — | |
| 16 | JAAAJanus Henderson AAA CLO ETF · CLO Bonds | Whole market | +5.1% | 1.7% | 2.98 | −2.6% | +28.0% | 0.00 | 0.20% |
| 17 | Whole market | +17.3% | 18.2% | 0.97 | −40.0% | +122% | 0.02 | — | |
| 18 | Whole market | +51.2% | 33.4% | 1.41 | −79.7% | +690% | 0.20 | — | |
| 19 | Whole market | +51.8% | 37.5% | 1.31 | −71.7% | +705% | 0.00 | — | |
| 20 | Same or nearby category | +40.7% | 32.8% | 1.21 | −34.5% | +451% | 0.01 | — | |
| 21 | PJULInnovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +10.5% | 8.6% | 1.20 | −18.2% | +64.4% | 0.19 | 0.79% |
| 22 | Whole market | +58.0% | 51.9% | 1.14 | −66.3% | +884% | 0.19 | — | |
| 23 | Whole market | +45.2% | 52.6% | 0.97 | −49.5% | +546% | 0.06 | — | |
| 24 | NEARiShares Short Duration Bond Active ETF · Short-Term Bonds | Whole market | +3.9% | 1.4% | 2.71 | −9.6% | +20.9% | 0.00 | 0.25% |
| 25 | Whole market | +2.3% | 2.9% | 0.80 | −12.9% | +12.1% | 0.15 | 0.03% | |
| 26 | Whole market | +7.2% | 19.2% | 0.46 | −29.0% | +41.8% | 0.03 | — | |
| 27 | VNLAJanus Henderson Short Duration Income ETF · Bonds | Whole market | +4.0% | 1.1% | 3.77 | −4.5% | +21.8% | 0.05 | 0.25% |
| 28 | Whole market | +47.3% | 32.5% | 1.36 | −68.9% | +594% | -0.05 | — | |
| 29 | Whole market | +7.6% | 26.1% | 0.41 | −37.8% | +44.5% | 0.00 | — | |
| 30 | Whole market | +42.1% | 24.7% | 1.55 | −46.1% | +479% | 0.02 | — | |
| 31 | Whole market | +13.9% | 34.5% | 0.55 | −42.6% | +91.9% | 0.24 | — | |
| 32 | FLRNState Street SPDR Bloomberg Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF · Bonds | Whole market | +4.5% | 1.7% | 2.58 | −14.7% | +24.4% | 0.01 | 0.15% |
| 33 | FLTRVanEck IG Floating Rate ETF · Multi-Asset | Whole market | +4.8% | 2.1% | 2.20 | −17.8% | +26.3% | -0.03 | 0.14% |
| 34 | Whole market | +18.5% | 28.0% | 0.75 | −38.5% | +133% | 0.05 | — | |
| 35 | SHYiShares 1-3 Year Treasury Bond ETF · Treasury Bonds | Whole market | +1.8% | 2.0% | 0.89 | −5.7% | +9.3% | 0.10 | 0.15% |
| 36 | Whole market | +12.5% | 31.3% | 0.53 | −37.1% | +79.9% | 0.35 | — | |
| 37 | Whole market | +77.0% | 46.7% | 1.46 | −49.7% | +1,636% | 0.05 | — | |
| 38 | CHTChunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. · Integrated Telecommunications | Whole market | +7.7% | 13.3% | 0.63 | −23.8% | +45.1% | 0.11 | — |
| 39 | FLDRFidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF · Bonds | Whole market | +3.9% | 1.2% | 3.09 | −12.2% | +20.9% | 0.08 | 0.15% |
| 40 | Whole market | +19.0% | 32.0% | 0.71 | −44.6% | +138% | 0.04 | — | |
| 41 | Whole market | +12.3% | 27.3% | 0.56 | −43.8% | +78.5% | 0.01 | — | |
| 42 | Same or nearby category | +12.7% | 17.9% | 0.76 | −27.4% | +82.1% | 0.23 | — | |
| 43 | UIUbiquiti Inc. · Communications Equipment | Whole market | +14.4% | 49.2% | 0.52 | −72.2% | +95.9% | 0.11 | — |
| 44 | Whole market | +23.5% | 18.8% | 1.22 | −75.2% | +187% | 0.01 | — | |
| 45 | HYGHiShares Interest Rate Hedged High Yield Bond ETF · Bonds | Whole market | +6.6% | 7.1% | 0.94 | −23.9% | +37.6% | 0.13 | 1.12% |
| 46 | Whole market | +101% | 59.7% | 1.47 | −80.6% | +3,143% | -0.04 | — | |
| 47 | Same or nearby category | +17.1% | 20.7% | 0.87 | −26.8% | +121% | 0.07 | — | |
| 48 | Whole market | +48.3% | 44.5% | 1.11 | −48.3% | +617% | -0.08 | — | |
| 49 | RAVINorthern Trust Ultra-Short Fixed Income ETF · Bonds | Whole market | +3.8% | 1.4% | 2.61 | −3.7% | +20.2% | 0.05 | 0.26% |
| 50 | Whole market | +31.5% | 38.5% | 0.91 | −56.6% | +293% | 0.24 | — | |
| 51 | PKGPackaging Corporation of America · Packaging | Whole market | +15.4% | 25.8% | 0.69 | −38.2% | +105% | -0.03 | — |
| 52 | Same or nearby category | +16.3% | 24.8% | 0.74 | −43.4% | +113% | 0.30 | — | |
| 53 | USHYiShares Broad USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF · High Yield Bonds | Whole market | +3.6% | 7.4% | 0.52 | −22.4% | +19.2% | 0.18 | 0.08% |
| 54 | EWJiShares MSCI Japan ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +9.2% | 18.8% | 0.57 | −33.1% | +55.6% | 0.32 | 0.49% |
| 55 | Whole market | +11.5% | 17.5% | 0.71 | −35.0% | +72.6% | 0.19 | 0.03% | |
| 56 | Whole market | +68.1% | 57.1% | 1.20 | −57.6% | +1,244% | 0.29 | — | |
| 57 | SUBiShares Short-Term National Muni Bond ETF · Municipal Bonds | Whole market | +1.4% | 1.7% | 0.85 | −9.4% | +7.3% | 0.16 | 0.07% |
| 58 | USTBVictoryShares Short-Term Bond ETF · Bonds | Whole market | +3.6% | 2.0% | 1.73 | −5.3% | +19.1% | 0.13 | 0.34% |
| 59 | Whole market | +12.8% | 16.9% | 0.80 | −34.0% | +82.3% | 0.18 | 0.03% | |
| 60 | BKLNInvesco Senior Loan ETF · Bank Loans | Whole market | +5.4% | 4.5% | 1.19 | −24.1% | +29.8% | 0.10 | 0.67% |
| 61 | ATIATI Inc. · Metals & Mining | Whole market | +61.8% | 42.9% | 1.34 | −82.4% | +1,008% | 0.09 | — |
| 62 | MUSAMurphy USA Inc. · Convenience Stores | Whole market | +26.1% | 31.2% | 0.90 | −35.5% | +218% | -0.23 | — |
| 63 | FNFabrinet · Electronics Manufacturing | Whole market | +29.2% | 57.1% | 0.74 | −52.4% | +260% | 0.11 | — |
| 64 | LMBSFirst Trust Low Duration Opportunities ETF · Mortgage-Backed Securities | Whole market | +3.0% | 2.6% | 1.14 | −6.5% | +15.8% | 0.09 | 0.66% |
| 65 | SRLNState Street Blackstone Senior Loan ETF · Bank Loans | Whole market | +4.7% | 3.9% | 1.18 | −22.3% | +25.6% | 0.07 | 0.70% |
| 66 | XLPState Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF · Consumer Staples | Whole market | +7.2% | 13.8% | 0.57 | −24.5% | +41.4% | 0.06 | 0.08% |
| 67 | CHRWC.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. · Freight & Logistics | Whole market | +9.9% | 34.4% | 0.45 | −40.6% | +60.0% | 0.16 | — |
| 68 | FCFSFirstCash Holdings, Inc · Consumer Finance | Whole market | +20.6% | 30.5% | 0.77 | −50.2% | +155% | 0.07 | — |
| 69 | NEUNewMarket Corporation · Specialty Chemicals | Whole market | +21.0% | 26.8% | 0.85 | −40.7% | +159% | -0.04 | — |
| 70 | Whole market | +13.4% | 17.1% | 0.82 | −29.6% | +87.8% | -0.03 | — | |
| 71 | Same or nearby category | +8.7% | 35.7% | 0.41 | −28.7% | +52.1% | 0.11 | — | |
| 72 | Popular alternative | +22.8% | 24.9% | 0.95 | −30.5% | +180% | 0.26 | — | |
| 73 | Whole market | +15.5% | 45.4% | 0.55 | −76.7% | +106% | 0.03 | — | |
| 74 | CRSCarpenter Technology Corporation · Metals & Mining | Whole market | +63.9% | 46.5% | 1.30 | −74.7% | +1,082% | 0.04 | — |
| 75 | BJBJ's Wholesale Club Holdings, Inc. · Discount Retail | Whole market | +11.9% | 32.5% | 0.51 | −38.8% | +75.3% | -0.01 | — |
| 76 | Whole market | +27.1% | 26.5% | 1.04 | −61.0% | +232% | 0.11 | — | |
| 77 | FTSLFirst Trust Senior Loan Fund · Bonds | Whole market | +5.0% | 3.4% | 1.49 | −22.7% | +27.8% | 0.01 | 0.70% |
| 78 | Popular alternative | +19.6% | 24.9% | 0.85 | −24.9% | +145% | 0.36 | — | |
| 79 | TRMDTORM plc · Marine Shipping | Whole market | +54.3% | 45.9% | 1.18 | −60.6% | +776% | 0.20 | — |
| 80 | FSSFederal Signal Corporation · Industrial Machinery | Whole market | +23.3% | 31.7% | 0.82 | −33.0% | +185% | 0.16 | — |
| 81 | Whole market | +35.7% | 57.6% | 0.82 | −65.5% | +359% | 0.17 | — | |
| 82 | PDBCInvesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF · Broad Commodities | Whole market | +11.7% | 19.3% | 0.67 | −40.7% | +73.9% | 0.07 | 0.74% |
| 83 | QYLDGlobal X - Nasdaq 100 Covered Call ETF · Equity Income | Whole market | +8.4% | 15.0% | 0.62 | −24.7% | +49.8% | 0.33 | 0.60% |
| 84 | Whole market | +17.3% | 24.3% | 0.78 | −43.6% | +122% | 0.09 | — | |
| 85 | Popular alternative | +22.6% | 29.1% | 0.85 | −41.6% | +177% | 0.31 | — | |
| 86 | FLTWFranklin FTSE Taiwan ETF · Technology | Whole market | +21.8% | 24.3% | 0.94 | −38.0% | +168% | 0.34 | 0.19% |
| 87 | DVADaVita Inc. · Health Care Facilities | Whole market | +9.0% | 38.3% | 0.42 | −51.1% | +53.7% | -0.17 | — |
| 88 | DBMFiMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF · Alternatives | Whole market | +9.8% | 12.4% | 0.82 | −20.4% | +59.7% | 0.02 | 0.85% |
| 89 | TNKTeekay Tankers Ltd. · Marine Shipping | Whole market | +50.5% | 45.1% | 1.14 | −63.4% | +673% | 0.14 | — |
| 90 | DHTDHT Holdings, Inc. · Marine Shipping | Whole market | +38.7% | 39.0% | 1.04 | −39.7% | +413% | 0.20 | — |
| 91 | SFMSprouts Farmers Market, Inc. · Grocery Stores | Whole market | +23.8% | 40.3% | 0.74 | −65.2% | +191% | -0.11 | — |
| 92 | NFGNational Fuel Gas Company · Oil & Gas | Whole market | +9.8% | 22.1% | 0.53 | −44.3% | +59.3% | 0.05 | — |
| 93 | CMBTCmb.Tech N.V. · Freight & Logistics | Whole market | +25.2% | 42.8% | 0.74 | −57.2% | +208% | 0.25 | — |
| 94 | VIRTVirtu Financial, Inc. · Capital Markets | Whole market | +20.8% | 33.8% | 0.73 | −56.2% | +158% | 0.19 | — |
| 95 | USLMUnited States Lime & Minerals, Inc. · Construction Materials | Whole market | +35.6% | 36.1% | 1.03 | −45.9% | +359% | 0.01 | — |
| 96 | Whole market | +12.8% | 22.9% | 0.64 | −36.4% | +82.5% | 0.00 | — | |
| 97 | Whole market | +51.4% | 67.0% | 0.95 | −84.6% | +695% | 0.12 | — | |
| 98 | Whole market | +36.0% | 31.0% | 1.15 | −80.9% | +366% | 0.08 | — | |
| 99 | FTGCFirst Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund · Alternatives | Whole market | +12.9% | 15.6% | 0.86 | −35.9% | +83.4% | 0.10 | 0.98% |
| 100 | DXJWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund · International Equity | Whole market | +26.6% | 19.1% | 1.34 | −39.1% | +225% | 0.20 | 0.48% |
MRNA against its popular alternatives
The investments people most often weigh against MRNA, compared period by period and year by year.
How do MRNA's risk and return compare with its alternatives?
This map plots each investment's annual return over the past 5 years against its volatility, the size of its typical price swings. Investments toward the upper left earned more for a smoother ride, and those toward the lower right earned less for a rougher one. The dashed lines cross at MRNA, which divides the map into what did better or worse on each measure.
- 15 of the 19 popular alternatives, led by EXEL, GILD and VRTX, were both more rewarding and calmer than MRNA over the past 5 years, earning a higher annual return with lower volatility.
- Over the past 5 years, MRNA returned -6.2% a year, less than the S&P 500's 12.7%, with higher volatility (104.4% against 17.1%).
Green points earned more than MRNA with less volatility; red points earned less with more. Hover over a point for its figures. Total returns with dividends reinvested, annualized.
All figures
| Investment | Annual return | Volatility |
|---|---|---|
| EXEL Exelixis, Inc. | +24.4% | 35.8% |
| GILD Gilead Sciences, Inc. | +22.8% | 24.9% |
| VRTX Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated | +22.6% | 29.1% |
| AMGN Amgen Inc. | +19.6% | 24.9% |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | +12.7% | 17.1% |
| INCY Incyte Corporation | +12.2% | 30.1% |
| GSK GSK plc | +9.5% | 24.5% |
| IONS Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | +8.3% | 43.9% |
| REGN Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | +7.7% | 31.1% |
| TMO Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. | +2.9% | 27.8% |
| ALNY Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | +2.5% | 50.9% |
| SNY Sanofi | +0.6% | 25.3% |
| PFE Pfizer Inc. | −1.7% | 25.4% |
| BIIB Biogen Inc. | −1.8% | 34.7% |
| DHR Danaher Corporation | −3.8% | 29.1% |
| BMRN BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc. | −5.6% | 33.0% |
| MRNA This pageModerna, Inc. | −6.2% | 104% |
| BNTX BioNTech SE | −19.3% | 52.6% |
| SRPT Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. | −24.8% | 70.3% |
| OCGN Ocugen, Inc. | −37.9% | 89.4% |
| NVAX Novavax, Inc. | −39.1% | 105% |
Has MRNA consistently beaten its popular alternatives?
This section compares MRNA with the investments people most often weigh against it, checking each one over seven periods from one month to five years. Counting how often an alternative earned more than MRNA helps separate lasting outperformance from a single strong stretch.
- None of the 19 popular alternatives outperformed MRNA in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 2 long-term timeframes. The closest was EXEL.
- GILD, VRTX and AMGN earned more for the risk they took than MRNA (a higher Sharpe ratio) and fell less in their worst decline of the past 10 years.
A green cell means the alternative earned more than MRNA over that period. "Qualified" marks those that did so in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 2 long-term periods.
| Investment | Periods outperformed | Short term | Long term | Risk · 5 years | Fund | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1M | 3M | 6M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | Volatilitylower is calmer | Sharpehigher is better | Worst declinepast 10 years | Expense | Assets | Overlapsame sectors | ||
| MRNA Moderna, Inc. (this page) | — | +40.0% | +307% | +343% | +684% | +789% | +201% | −27.3% | 104% | 0.30 | −95.4% | — | $97B | — |
| EXEL BiotechnologyExelixis, Inc. | 0/5 short1/2 long | +12.5% | +16.0% | +47.6% | +47.8% | +86.4% | +205% | +198% | 35.8% | 0.79 | −57.2% | — | $16B | — |
| GILD Drug Manufacturers - GeneralGilead Sciences, Inc. | 0/5 short1/2 long | +4.0% | +18.2% | +16.6% | +31.0% | +30.3% | +121% | +180% | 24.9% | 0.95 | −30.5% | — | $194B | — |
| VRTX BiotechnologyVertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated | 0/5 short1/2 long | +0.8% | +7.1% | +17.2% | +13.8% | +22.8% | +42.2% | +177% | 29.1% | 0.85 | −41.6% | — | $130B | — |
| AMGN Drug Manufacturers - GeneralAmgen Inc. | 0/5 short1/2 long | +11.6% | +21.2% | +27.0% | +36.7% | +48.7% | +72.2% | +145% | 24.9% | 0.85 | −24.9% | — | $237B | — |
| INCY BiotechnologyIncyte Corporation | 0/5 short1/2 long | −6.4% | +0.8% | +20.3% | +15.0% | +35.3% | +112% | +77.6% | 30.1% | 0.53 | −66.5% | — | $24B | — |
| GSK Drug Manufacturers - GeneralGSK plc | 0/5 short1/2 long | −0.9% | +2.1% | −10.1% | +4.7% | +18.9% | +60.0% | +57.2% | 24.5% | 0.49 | −37.6% | — | $102B | — |
| IONS BiotechnologyIonis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | 0/5 short1/2 long | +1.1% | −14.3% | −39.4% | −43.0% | −38.3% | −1.6% | +48.8% | 43.9% | 0.40 | −70.4% | — | $7.5B | — |
| REGN BiotechnologyRegeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | 0/5 short1/2 long | +1.2% | +20.3% | +8.0% | +4.4% | +40.7% | +0.8% | +44.9% | 31.1% | 0.40 | −59.7% | — | $83B | — |
| TMO Medical - Diagnostics & ResearchThermo Fisher Scientific Inc. | 0/5 short1/2 long | +4.3% | +30.7% | +30.9% | +16.3% | +26.8% | +49.5% | +15.1% | 27.8% | 0.24 | −40.9% | — | $254B | — |
| ALNY BiotechnologyAlnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | 0/5 short1/2 long | −5.6% | −15.4% | −25.8% | −42.3% | −53.0% | +42.6% | +13.2% | 50.9% | 0.29 | −58.2% | — | $31B | — |
| SNY Drug Manufacturers - GeneralSanofi | 0/5 short1/2 long | −2.6% | −5.9% | −10.3% | −10.7% | −13.4% | −10.0% | +3.0% | 25.3% | 0.15 | −33.5% | — | $99B | — |
| PFE Drug Manufacturers - GeneralPfizer Inc. | 0/5 short1/2 long | +8.5% | +23.8% | +13.2% | +25.7% | +30.5% | +19.2% | −8.3% | 25.4% | 0.06 | −58.9% | — | $172B | — |
| BIIB Drug Manufacturers - GeneralBiogen Inc. | 0/5 short1/2 long | +11.0% | +21.6% | +32.6% | +36.7% | +65.8% | −5.6% | −8.8% | 34.7% | 0.11 | −72.7% | — | $36B | — |
| DHR Medical - Diagnostics & ResearchDanaher Corporation | 0/5 short1/2 long | +4.0% | +11.6% | +15.0% | −2.2% | +8.3% | +10.8% | −17.6% | 29.1% | 0.01 | −43.8% | — | $157B | — |
| BMRN BiotechnologyBioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc. | 0/5 short1/2 long | −11.9% | −4.5% | +2.8% | −5.1% | +6.3% | −31.3% | −24.9% | 33.0% | -0.01 | −62.1% | — | $11B | — |
| BNTX BiotechnologyBioNTech SE | 0/5 short0/2 long | −7.0% | −1.1% | −13.3% | −5.7% | −15.5% | +0.3% | −65.7% | 52.6% | -0.15 | −82.3% | — | $23B | — |
| SRPT BiotechnologySarepta Therapeutics, Inc. | 0/5 short0/2 long | −4.8% | +13.9% | −10.5% | −10.0% | −16.8% | −82.8% | −76.0% | 70.3% | -0.03 | −93.3% | — | $2.0B | — |
| OCGN BiotechnologyOcugen, Inc. | 0/5 short0/2 long | −21.1% | −38.9% | −56.1% | −41.1% | −49.8% | +103% | −90.7% | 89.4% | -0.09 | −99.9% | — | $276M | — |
| NVAX BiotechnologyNovavax, Inc. | 0/5 short0/2 long | +9.8% | +45.1% | +31.8% | +60.3% | +30.0% | +77.8% | −91.6% | 105% | 0.01 | −98.8% | — | $1.9B | — |
How did MRNA do year by year?
This table shows each investment's total return in every full calendar year since 2019, along with where MRNA ranked among its popular alternatives each year. Annual results reveal how consistently each one kept pace with MRNA and how far its good and bad years diverged, detail that multiyear averages tend to smooth over.
Note: MRNA began trading on December 7, 2018, so the table starts with 2019, its first full calendar year, and cannot show how it fared during the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or four other sell-offs.
- MRNA finished ahead of the S&P 500 in two of its seven full calendar years, and behind it in each of the last four.
- Ranked against its popular alternatives each year, MRNA finished in the top quarter in two of seven years and in the bottom quarter in four. In 2025, it ranked 19 of 20.
- Among its popular alternatives, VRTX came out ahead of MRNA most often, in five of the seven years both traded.
Newest year first. Green marks a year in which the fund came out ahead of MRNA; gray means the two finished within a fraction of a point. The rank row places MRNA among the alternatives that traded the full year; dark green is the top quarter and red the bottom quarter.
| Investment | Years ahead of MRNA | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MRNA This pageModerna, Inc. | — | −29.1% | −58.2% | −44.6% | −29.3% | +143% | +434% | +28.1% |
| Rank among alternatives | Top quarter in 2 of 7 | 19 of 20 | 20 of 20 | 18 of 20 | 17 of 20 | 3 of 20 | 2 of 20 | 7 of 19 |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 5 of 7 | +17.7% | +24.9% | +26.2% | −18.2% | +28.7% | +18.3% | +31.2% |
| EXEL Exelixis, Inc. | 4 of 7 | +31.6% | +38.8% | +49.6% | −12.3% | −8.9% | +13.9% | −10.4% |
| GILD Gilead Sciences, Inc. | 4 of 7 | +36.6% | +18.7% | −2.0% | +23.6% | +29.9% | −6.7% | +7.9% |
| VRTX Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated | 5 of 7 | +12.6% | −1.0% | +40.9% | +31.5% | −7.1% | +7.9% | +32.1% |
| AMGN Amgen Inc. | 4 of 7 | +29.7% | −6.8% | +13.5% | +20.4% | +0.9% | −2.0% | +27.6% |
| INCY Incyte Corporation | 5 of 7 | +43.0% | +10.0% | −21.8% | +9.4% | −15.6% | −0.4% | +37.3% |
| GSK GSK plc | 5 of 7 | +51.3% | −5.2% | +9.8% | −16.8% | +27.1% | −17.7% | +29.2% |
| IONS Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | 4 of 7 | +126% | −30.9% | +33.9% | +24.1% | −46.2% | −6.4% | +11.8% |
| REGN Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | 4 of 7 | +9.0% | −18.9% | +21.7% | +14.2% | +30.7% | +28.7% | +0.5% |
| TMO Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. | 5 of 7 | +11.8% | −1.7% | −3.4% | −17.3% | +43.5% | +43.7% | +45.6% |
| ALNY Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | 5 of 7 | +69.0% | +22.9% | −19.5% | +40.1% | +30.5% | +12.8% | +58.0% |
| SNY Sanofi | 4 of 7 | +4.9% | +1.1% | +6.5% | +0.5% | +7.0% | +0.4% | +20.5% |
| PFE Pfizer Inc. | 4 of 7 | +0.6% | −2.2% | −41.3% | −10.4% | +66.7% | +3.4% | −6.7% |
| BIIB Biogen Inc. | 4 of 7 | +15.1% | −40.9% | −6.6% | +15.4% | −2.0% | −17.5% | −1.4% |
| DHR Danaher Corporation | 5 of 7 | +0.4% | −0.4% | −1.2% | −19.0% | +48.6% | +45.4% | +49.5% |
| BMRN BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc. | 4 of 7 | −9.6% | −31.8% | −6.8% | +17.1% | +0.8% | +3.7% | −0.7% |
| BNTX BioNTech SE | 4 of 6 | −16.4% | +8.0% | −29.7% | −41.0% | +216% | +141% | — |
| SRPT Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. | 3 of 7 | −82.3% | +26.1% | −25.6% | +43.9% | −47.2% | +32.1% | +18.2% |
| OCGN Ocugen, Inc. | 3 of 7 | +67.7% | +40.0% | −55.8% | −71.4% | +149% | +252% | −90.1% |
| NVAX Novavax, Inc. | 3 of 7 | −16.4% | +67.5% | −53.3% | −92.8% | +28.3% | +2,702% | −89.2% |
Risk and diversification
How MRNA has fallen, how it held up in crashes beside the S&P 500 and its popular alternatives, and what moves independently of it.
What were MRNA's worst declines?
A drawdown is the decline from a peak to the lowest point before a new high. This section presents MRNA's five deepest drawdowns since it began trading in 2018, alongside the S&P 500's return over the same dates, and how long each took to recover. Together, these figures show how much an investor could have lost and how long it took to get back to even.
Note: MRNA began trading on December 7, 2018, so this list cannot include the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or four other sell-offs. The crash tests on this page show how older funds and the S&P 500 fared through those years.
- In all five of MRNA's worst declines, the S&P 500 held up better over the same dates.
- Not every decline was the market's doing: MRNA fell 95.4% from August 2021 to November 2025, while the S&P 500 rose 56.6%.
- None of these declines kept MRNA below its old high for long; the longest climb back took six months.
Green means MRNA fell less than the S&P 500 over the same dates. Based on daily closing prices with dividends reinvested.
| During | MRNA fell | S&P 500, same dates | Peak | Low | Time to the low | Back at the peak | Time to recover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 bear market | −95.4% | +56.6% | Aug 2021 | Nov 2025 | 4.3 years | Not yet | — |
| No named crash | −56.7% | −2.1% | May 2019 | Aug 2019 | 3 months | Feb 2020 | 6 months |
| No named crash | −42.7% | +3.6% | Jul 2020 | Sep 2020 | 2 months | Nov 2020 | 2 months |
| No named crash | −38.5% | +1.4% | Dec 2020 | Dec 2020 | Under a month | Jan 2021 | 1 month |
| No named crash | −36.3% | +1.4% | Feb 2021 | Mar 2021 | 1 month | May 2021 | 2 months |
How did MRNA do in stock market crashes?
This section measures how far MRNA, the S&P 500 and each alternative fell from peak to trough during every major market crash since 2000. A smaller decline means an investment held up better, and comparing results across crashes shows whether that resilience was consistent or a one-off.
Note: MRNA began trading on December 7, 2018, so its row reads "Not yet trading" for the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or five other sell-offs. The older alternatives and the S&P 500 show how those crashes played out.
- Among its popular alternatives, GILD held up best, falling less than MRNA in all three crashes they both traded through.
- MRNA began trading after the 2008 financial crisis, but 17 of its popular alternatives lived through it. The mildest fall among them was AMGN's 31.3%, against 55.2% for the S&P 500.
- MRNA fell less than the S&P 500 in one of the three crashes it has traded through. The clearest case was the Covid crash, when MRNA fell 28.7% and the S&P 500 fell 33.7%.
Newest crash first. Each figure is the fund's deepest fall within the crash window; green means a smaller fall than MRNA.
| Investment | Held up better | 2023 regional bank crisisMar 2023 | 2022 bear marketJan 2022 | Covid crashFeb 2020 | Late-2018 sell-offSep 2018 | February 2018 volatility shockFeb 2018 | 2015 China and oil sell-offAug 2015 | 2011 euro debt crisisJul 2011 | 2010 flash crashMay 2010 | 2008 financial crisisOct 2007 | Dot-com bustMar 2000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MRNA This pageModerna, Inc. | — | −3.3% | −49.9% | −28.7% | Not yet trading | Not yet trading | Not yet trading | Not yet trading | Not yet trading | Not yet trading | Not yet trading |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 1 of 3 | −3.4% | −24.5% | −33.7% | −19.3% | −6.5% | −12.8% | −17.9% | −1.5% | −55.2% | −47.5% |
| EXEL Exelixis, Inc. | 2 of 3 | 0.0% | −35.4% | −33.7% | −24.9% | −8.7% | −36.4% | −43.7% | −5.4% | −80.0% | — |
| GILD Gilead Sciences, Inc. | 3 of 3 | −1.6% | −20.0% | −13.7% | −22.7% | −5.5% | −28.7% | −18.2% | −2.1% | −34.3% | −53.6% |
| VRTX Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated | 3 of 3 | 0.0% | −19.2% | −19.4% | −21.2% | −8.8% | −43.7% | −23.9% | −2.7% | −59.9% | −86.7% |
| AMGN Amgen Inc. | 3 of 3 | −1.2% | −11.9% | −18.3% | −14.3% | −7.4% | −22.1% | −12.6% | −0.5% | −31.3% | −60.2% |
| INCY Incyte Corporation | 3 of 3 | −2.4% | −20.4% | −23.7% | −16.4% | −4.8% | −50.2% | −32.9% | −4.5% | −83.5% | −97.1% |
| GSK GSK plc | 3 of 3 | −0.3% | −37.6% | −26.5% | −11.5% | −4.3% | −15.7% | −12.4% | −2.0% | −46.6% | −45.1% |
| IONS Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | 1 of 3 | −5.8% | −26.3% | −32.6% | −18.1% | −8.5% | −48.8% | −25.7% | −2.1% | −45.6% | −74.6% |
| REGN Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | 3 of 3 | −0.2% | −25.8% | −12.7% | −17.3% | −7.3% | −37.7% | −23.2% | −7.2% | −49.9% | −71.6% |
| TMO Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. | 3 of 3 | −2.4% | −19.8% | −24.8% | −17.2% | −8.7% | −14.7% | −24.4% | −3.6% | −53.9% | −41.8% |
| ALNY Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | 1 of 3 | −4.1% | −28.9% | −30.0% | −33.7% | −6.9% | −48.9% | −39.3% | −1.5% | −58.6% | — |
| SNY Sanofi | 3 of 3 | −0.5% | −33.5% | −25.2% | −9.0% | −9.8% | −30.2% | −20.7% | −2.8% | −46.6% | — |
| PFE Pfizer Inc. | 3 of 3 | −1.8% | −24.6% | −21.8% | −12.3% | −8.1% | −18.2% | −16.1% | −1.8% | −49.8% | −46.0% |
| BIIB Biogen Inc. | 3 of 3 | −2.5% | −22.4% | −21.2% | −21.7% | −9.3% | −24.6% | −19.4% | −0.6% | −52.7% | −59.8% |
| DHR Danaher Corporation | 2 of 3 | −3.2% | −22.8% | −25.9% | −13.4% | −9.8% | −14.0% | −21.8% | −0.6% | −45.7% | −33.7% |
| BMRN BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc. | 2 of 3 | −4.5% | −22.9% | −26.3% | −24.4% | −11.6% | −53.6% | −23.1% | −4.1% | −74.9% | −89.7% |
| BNTX BioNTech SE | 2 of 3 | −1.2% | −45.7% | −49.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| SRPT Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. | 1 of 3 | −6.7% | −29.7% | −33.6% | −39.7% | −12.6% | −74.3% | −39.5% | −5.0% | −84.4% | −87.3% |
| OCGN Ocugen, Inc. | 0 of 3 | −4.9% | −64.0% | −51.8% | −87.0% | −12.3% | −67.1% | — | — | — | — |
| NVAX Novavax, Inc. | 0 of 3 | −5.4% | −88.2% | −56.8% | −30.2% | −6.0% | −68.0% | −44.6% | −3.7% | −86.7% | −87.6% |
How closely does MRNA move with the S&P 500?
Upside capture measures how much of the S&P 500's gains an investment kept in the months the market rose, and downside capture how much of its losses it took in the months the market fell. An investment that captures more of the gains than the losses has compounded ahead of the market over time. This section compares MRNA with its popular alternatives on both measures, and on beta (how strongly each has moved with the market), over the past 5 years.
- 13 of the 18 popular alternatives had a higher capture ratio (upside capture divided by downside capture) than MRNA's 0.28, led by VRTX, GILD and AMGN.
- EXEL took just -17% of the S&P 500's losses, against 172% for MRNA, while still keeping 61% of its gains.
- Over the past 5 years, MRNA captured 49% of the S&P 500's gains in rising months and 172% of its losses in falling months, with a beta of 1.09. Its share of the market's losses was larger than its share of the gains.
Monthly total returns over the past 5 years, measured against SPY. 100% capture or a beta of 1.00 means moving in line with the S&P 500. Green marks a better figure than MRNA's: more upside, less downside or a higher capture ratio. Sorted by capture ratio.
| Investment | Upside capture | Downside capture | Capture ratio | Beta |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MRNA This pageModerna, Inc. | 49% | 172% | 0.28 | 1.09 |
| VRTX Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated | 77% | 8% | 9.21 | 0.28 |
| GILD Gilead Sciences, Inc. | 73% | 17% | 4.43 | 0.32 |
| AMGN Amgen Inc. | 76% | 34% | 2.26 | 0.41 |
| ALNY Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | 29% | 20% | 1.46 | 0.27 |
| GSK GSK plc | 51% | 39% | 1.31 | 0.36 |
| INCY Incyte Corporation | 85% | 83% | 1.02 | 0.73 |
| IONS Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | 57% | 69% | 0.83 | 0.38 |
| REGN Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | 49% | 61% | 0.81 | 0.16 |
| TMO Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. | 102% | 160% | 0.64 | 0.88 |
| SNY Sanofi | 45% | 76% | 0.59 | 0.34 |
| DHR Danaher Corporation | 61% | 132% | 0.47 | 0.77 |
| PFE Pfizer Inc. | 34% | 79% | 0.42 | 0.32 |
| BIIB Biogen Inc. | 19% | 63% | 0.30 | 0.09 |
| BNTX BioNTech SE | 51% | 213% | 0.24 | 1.24 |
| OCGN Ocugen, Inc. | 76% | 359% | 0.21 | 2.26 |
| BMRN BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc. | 5% | 41% | 0.12 | 0.22 |
| NVAX Novavax, Inc. | 47% | 424% | 0.11 | 2.44 |
| SRPT Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. | -26% | 152% | -0.17 | 0.38 |
| EXEL Exelixis, Inc. | 61% | -17% | — | 0.47 |
What diversifies MRNA?
Correlation measures how closely two investments move together, on a scale from 1 (in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to -1 (in opposite directions). This section lists large ETFs and stocks whose returns have had a low correlation with MRNA's. Because such investments tend not to fall at the same time, pairing MRNA with them can reduce a portfolio's overall swings.
- Moving a fifth of the money in MRNA into LVHI would have cut the portfolio's volatility by 20% over the past 5 years and raised its annual return (-12.9% for MRNA alone, -3.6% for the mix).
- CLS made money in four of the four calendar years in which MRNA lost money.
- Among large ETFs, LVHI, DXJ and EMLP have moved largely independently of MRNA over the past 5 years, with correlations of 0.20 or lower, and each still earned a positive 5-year return.
Only ETFs with at least $1.0B in assets and stocks worth at least $10B, with a correlation below 0.5 over the past 5 years and a positive return, are included, ranked by Sharpe ratio; funds that hold the same thing are shown once. The year columns are the years in which MRNA lost money. The last two columns show a portfolio that is 80% MRNA and 20% the other investment, rebalanced monthly.
ETFs
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MRNA Moderna, Inc. (this page) | 1.00 | −27.3% | 0.30 | −29.1% | −58.2% | −44.6% | −29.3% | 93.9% | −12.9% |
| LVHI InternationalFranklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 0.08 | +119% | 1.48 | +27.1% | +15.9% | +17.4% | +3.8% | 75.3% | −3.6% |
| DXJ InternationalWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund | 0.20 | +225% | 1.34 | +32.8% | +29.8% | +42.0% | +6.0% | 75.6% | −2.1% |
| EMLP Broad MarketFirst Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund | 0.06 | +101% | 1.04 | +9.7% | +33.4% | +8.0% | +10.4% | 75.3% | −3.8% |
| HDV Dividend & IncomeiShares Core High Dividend ETF | 0.18 | +83.3% | 1.00 | +11.9% | +14.1% | +1.8% | +7.1% | 75.7% | −4.5% |
| SMH TechnologyVanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.28 | +323% | 0.97 | +49.2% | +39.1% | +73.4% | −33.5% | 77.3% | −0.9% |
| DBEF InternationalXtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF | 0.24 | +85.0% | 0.96 | +23.1% | +13.4% | +20.1% | −5.1% | 75.6% | −4.4% |
| GLD CommoditiesSPDR Gold Shares | 0.19 | +126% | 0.96 | +63.7% | +26.7% | +12.7% | −0.8% | 75.8% | −3.4% |
| SPMO Broad MarketInvesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 0.20 | +136% | 0.93 | +26.6% | +45.8% | +17.6% | −10.4% | 76.0% | −3.0% |
Stocks
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MRNA Moderna, Inc. (this page) | 1.00 | −27.3% | 0.30 | −29.1% | −58.2% | −44.6% | −29.3% | 93.9% | −12.9% |
| CAH Medical - DistributionCardinal Health, Inc. | 0.02 | +479% | 1.55 | +76.3% | +19.0% | +34.1% | +54.1% | 75.4% | +0.3% |
| CLS Hardware, Equipment & PartsCelestica Inc. | -0.04 | +3,143% | 1.47 | +220% | +215% | +160% | +1.3% | 75.6% | +11.3% |
| FIX Engineering & ConstructionComfort Systems USA, Inc. | 0.05 | +1,636% | 1.46 | +121% | +107% | +79.6% | +17.0% | 76.0% | +7.3% |
| MCK Medical - DistributionMcKesson Corporation | 0.01 | +413% | 1.44 | +44.5% | +23.7% | +24.1% | +51.8% | 75.3% | −0.3% |
| MPC Oil & Gas Refining & MarketingMarathon Petroleum Corporation | 0.20 | +690% | 1.41 | +19.2% | −4.0% | +30.4% | +86.6% | 76.7% | +1.6% |
Common questions
What was MRNA's worst drawdown?
MRNA's deepest decline since it began trading in 2018 was 95.4%, from August 2021 to November 2025. It has not yet climbed back to that peak. Because MRNA launched in December 2018, that record does not include the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or four other sell-offs.
What were MRNA's best and worst years?
Over seven full calendar years, MRNA's best year was 2020, when it returned 434%. Its worst was 2024, with a return of -58.2%.
Is there a better investment than MRNA?
Among MRNA's popular alternatives, GILD, AMGN and VRTX earned more than MRNA with less volatility over the past 5 years. GILD returned 22.8% a year at 24.9% volatility, against a loss of 6.2% a year at 104%. Looking beyond its popular alternatives, LLY (pharmaceuticals) and JNJ (pharmaceuticals) earned more than MRNA with less volatility over the past 5 years. LLY returned 40.7% a year at 32.8% volatility, against a loss of 6.2% a year at 104%.
Is MRNA more volatile than the S&P 500?
Yes. MRNA's volatility over the past 5 years was 104%, 6.1 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, MRNA's return lands within 104% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump.
What is MRNA's Sharpe ratio?
MRNA's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.30, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so MRNA earned less for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings.
How correlated is MRNA with the S&P 500?
Over the past 5 years, MRNA's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.18 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They are only loosely linked, which makes it a real diversifier next to an index fund. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against MRNA instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a MRNA holding.
What are the best alternatives to MRNA?
None of the 19 popular alternatives we compared outperformed MRNA in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 2 long-term timeframes, which says more about MRNA's strength than about its alternatives.
Did MRNA outperform the S&P 500?
MRNA finished ahead of the S&P 500 (SPY) in two of seven full calendar years. In 2025, it returned -29.1%, against +17.7% for the index.
How did MRNA do in stock market crashes?
MRNA fell less than the S&P 500 (SPY) in one of the three major crashes it has traded through, and further in one. The clearest case was the Covid crash, when MRNA fell 28.7% and the S&P 500 fell 33.7%.
What diversifies MRNA?
These had a low correlation with MRNA over the past 5 years and still earned a positive 5-year return: among large ETFs, LVHI (correlation 0.08), DXJ (correlation 0.20) and EMLP (correlation 0.06); among large stocks, CAH (correlation 0.02), CLS (correlation -0.04) and FIX (correlation 0.05). A correlation near zero means the two have moved largely independently.
How we measure
- Short-term periods are 1M, 3M, 6M, YTD, 1Y; long-term periods are 3Y, 5Y. An investment outperformed in a period when its total return, with dividends reinvested, was higher than MRNA's. Returns within 0.5 points or 3% of MRNA's, whichever is larger, count as a tie.
- "Qualified" means outperforming in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 2 long-term periods. "All-weather" means outperforming in every long-term period and all but one short-term period.
- Popular alternatives are the funds and stocks most often compared with this one. We include only those that trade today, are not leveraged or inverse, and hold at least $200 million.
- Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily returns over 5 years, a measure of how much the price typically swings in a year. The Sharpe ratio is the return above cash for each unit of that volatility.
- A decline, or drawdown, runs from a peak to the lowest close before the next high. The worst decline ever uses all the price history we have; comparisons between funds use the past 10 years so that younger funds are judged on the same stretch.
- Sector overlap is the share of assets two funds hold in the same sectors. Correlation and the mixed-portfolio figures use monthly returns.
- Upside and downside capture follow Morningstar's definition: the compound monthly return in the months the S&P 500 rose (or fell), divided by the S&P 500's compound return in those months. Beta measures how strongly monthly returns have moved with the S&P 500. All three use the same window for every investment.
- Figures are computed from daily adjusted prices and update after each trading day. Past performance does not predict future results.
More research
Popular alternatives to MRNA
GILDGilead Sciences
VRTXVertex Pharmaceuticals
AMGNAmgen
GSKGSK
REGNRegeneron Pharmaceuticals
TMOThermo Fisher Scientific
SNYSanofi
PFEPfizer
DHRDanaher