Relative Intelligence · Industrial REITs

How Prologis (PLD) compares with the whole market and its popular alternatives
Built by QuantCommons' quantitative engine, this page is about relative opportunity, not data on PLD alone. It places PLD (Prologis, Inc.) against 15 popular alternatives, its neighboring categories and the entire market of over 10,000 U.S.-listed stocks and ETFs, and surfaces what has done better on consistent outperformance, return for the risk taken, behavior in real market crashes and diversification. The result is a clearer view of where PLD stands in the market, and of the alternatives worth a closer look.
Period covered: PLD's full trading record, from November 1997 through September 2026. All returns include reinvested dividends. Data as of October 20, 2026.
Data as of October 20, 2026. Full tables and charts read best on a larger screen.
On this page12 sections
Key findings
- Right nowOver the past 6 months, PLD fell 10.8% while the S&P 500 rose 9.1%. At a glance ↓
- Stock or market?The weakness is PLD's own: it fell 12.9% over the past 3 months while the industrial reits ETF VNQ (Vanguard Real Estate ETF) fell 6.4%. The S&P 500 rose 3.9%. Its industrial reit peers did not move as one over the past 3 months: REXR (Rexford Industrial Realty) rose 1.7%, while LINE (Lineage) fell 19.1%.
- Past 1 to 3 yearsPLD has trailed the market, rising 3.4% over the past year against 15.8% for the S&P 500 and 17.9% for the Nasdaq 100. The same gap shows up over 3 years (37.1% against 89.3%). By year ↓
- Long termPLD turned $10,000 into $32,100 over the past decade, against $42,100 in the S&P 500. On the flip side, over the past decade, only EGP (EastGroup Properties) of its industrial reit peers outpaced PLD. Growth of $10,000 ↓
- In a crashAcross seven sell-offs, PLD has typically fallen 1.3 times as far as the S&P 500. The 2022 bear market took 42.1% off PLD, against 24.5% for the S&P 500. That was more than EGP (EastGroup Properties, 36.5%) but less than LXP (LXP Industrial Trust, 44.3%). Crash tests ↓
- DiversificationAgainst the S&P 500, PLD has a correlation of 0.69 over 5 years, more closely than 98% of stocks worth at least $300 million. Next to an index fund it is more of the same, not a cushion. Over 10 years, PLD's beta versus the S&P 500 was 1.04: in the S&P 500's rising months it gained 1.0 times as much as the index, and in falling months it lost 1.2 times as much. Market capture ↓
- Better options
- Nearby categories and themes
- PSA (Public Storage, self-storage reits) and WPC (W. P. Carey, net lease reits) earned more than PLD with less volatility over the past 5 years. PSA returned 3.2% a year at 24.1% volatility, against 0.6% a year at 27.2%.
- Versus the S&P 500
- Simply owning the S&P 500 would have done better over the past 5 years: 12.7% a year at 17.1% volatility, against 0.6% at 27.2% for PLD.
- Whole market
- 1,006 of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than PLD with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them VTI (Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF), VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) and BRK-B (Berkshire Hathaway).
How much would $10,000 in PLD have grown?
This chart tracks a hypothetical $10,000 investment in PLD over the past 28 years, with dividends reinvested, alongside the same amount in the S&P 500, investments that ended ahead of PLD over the same span and PLD's popular alternatives, among those that traded for the entire period. A second view covers the past 5 years, the period the better options further down the page are judged on. It shows not only where each investment ended up but also how smooth or uneven the path was.
- $10,000 invested in PLD at the end of September 1998 would have grown to $149,414 by September 2026, more than the $121,630 it would have become in SPY, an S&P 500 fund.
- Five of the seven other investments on the chart ended ahead of PLD, and AMZN finished highest, at $2,678,358.
Choose a period
From the end of September 1998 to the end of September 2026. The scale is logarithmic, so equal steps up the chart are equal percentage gains. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 468 of the 1,106 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of PLD; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 2 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- AMZN$3M+26,684% total · +22.1% a year
- EXPD$691,490+6,815% total · +16.3% a year
- EGP$373,246+3,632% total · +13.8% a year
- PSA$306,772+2,968% total · +13.0% a year
- FDX$246,428+2,364% total · +12.1% a year
- PLD$149,414+1,394% total · +10.1% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$121,630+1,116% total · +9.3% a year
- FR$78,240+682% total · +7.6% a year
- LXP$65,226+552% total · +6.9% a year
From the end of September 2021 to the end of September 2026. The scale is logarithmic, so equal steps up the chart are equal percentage gains. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 2,135 of the 3,628 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of PLD; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- SPY (S&P 500)$19,000+90.0% total · +13.7% a year
- FDX$17,773+77.7% total · +12.2% a year
- AMZN$15,169+51.7% total · +8.7% a year
- DLR$14,403+44.0% total · +7.6% a year
- EGP$13,821+38.2% total · +6.7% a year
- FR$13,155+31.5% total · +5.6% a year
- LXP$12,292+22.9% total · +4.2% a year
- PLD$11,993+19.9% total · +3.7% a year
- TRNO$11,823+18.2% total · +3.4% a year
- ILPT$3,160−68.4% total · −20.6% a year
PLD at a glance
This section summarizes the key facts about the stock, its returns over periods from one to ten years and the risk it has carried, with dividends reinvested throughout. These figures serve as the baseline for every comparison that follows.
- PLD's deepest decline since it began trading in 1997 was 84.7%, from October 2007 to March 2009. It took about seven years from the low to climb back to its old high.
- Over 28 full calendar years, PLD's best was 2021, when it returned 72.3%, and its worst was 2008, when it lost 58.0%. It lost money in seven of those years.
- PLD is 15.4% below its all-time high.
The company
- Market value
- $121B
- Industry
- REIT - Industrial
- Price history from
- November 1997
Returns
- Past 1 year
- +3.4%total return
- Past 3 years
- +37.1%+11.1% a year
- Past 5 years
- +3.0%+0.6% a year
- Past 10 years
- +221%+12.4% a year
- Best calendar year
- +72.3%2021
- Worst calendar year
- −58.0%2008
- Losing years
- 7 of 28full calendar years
Risk
- Volatility
- 27.2%typical yearly swing, 5 years
- Sharpe ratio
- 0.16return per unit of risk, 5 years
- Worst decline ever
- −84.7%Oct 2007 to Mar 2009
- From its all-time high
- −15.4%below the peak
PLD against the whole market
Where PLD ranks among every stock and fund, and what across the market has done better.
How does PLD rank among all stocks?
This section ranks PLD on return, volatility, risk-adjusted return and worst decline against every stock worth at least $300 million with enough history. Where the comparisons with its popular alternatives show how PLD stacks up against its peers, these rankings show where it stands in the market as a whole.
- PLD's worst decline of the past 10 years ranks in the top 11% of the 2,187 stocks worth at least $300 million, where the top fell the least.
Ranked against U.S.-listed stocks worth at least $300M that have enough history for each measure, so the count changes from row to row; smaller stocks are left out. Lower volatility and smaller declines rank higher.
| Measure | PLD | Rank | Standing |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +3.4% | 1,837 of 3,287 | bottom 45% |
| 3-year return | +37.1% | 1,746 of 3,017 | bottom 43% |
| 5-year return | +3.0% | 1,697 of 2,893 | bottom 42% |
| 10-year return | +221% | 796 of 2,202 | top 36% |
| Volatility, 5 years | 27.2% | 497 of 2,893 | top 17% |
| Sharpe ratio, 5 years | 0.16 | 1,966 of 2,893 | bottom 33% |
| Worst decline, past 10 years | −43.3% | 238 of 2,187 | top 11% |
What has beaten PLD on both return and risk?
Each dot is an investment, placed by how much it earned a year over the past 5 years (higher is better) and how much its price swung, its volatility (further left is calmer). PLD sits where the dashed lines cross. Anything in the green box above and to the left earned more than PLD with smaller swings, a better trade-off over this period on both counts. Past results are no promise, but a name in the box is worth a closer look.
- 258 stocks and 748 ETFs worth at least $500 million sit in the green region: each earned more than PLD over the past 5 years with smaller price swings. That is 28% of the 3,633 screened.
- Among those with at least half PLD's swings, CAH has the best return for its risk: 42.1% a year at 24.7% volatility, 9% less than PLD's 27.2%, and a Sharpe ratio (return above cash per unit of volatility) of 1.55 against 0.16 for PLD.
- Among PLD's popular alternatives, EGP and FR are in the region. EGP earned 4.4% a year against 0.6% a year for PLD, at 23.3% volatility, 14% less than PLD's 27.2%.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested, and volatility the annualized swing in daily prices, both over 5 years. Labeled dots are the strongest picks from the table below and the names called out above, colored by how close they sit to PLD; faint dots are 93 more of the 1,006 in the green region (the strongest, one per fund family). 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million were screened. Hover over a dot for its figures.
- Popular alternatives
- Same and neighboring categories, and shared themes
- The whole market
- Others in the green region
Is there a better investment than PLD?
Investments that beat PLD over the past 5 years on return, volatility, drawdowns, consistency, crash losses or fees, from its popular alternatives out to the whole market.
- Among PLD's popular alternatives, EGP and FR earned more than PLD with less volatility over the past 5 years. EGP returned 4.4% a year at 23.3% volatility, against 0.6% a year at 27.2%.
- Looking beyond its popular alternatives, PSA (self-storage reits) and WPC (net lease reits) earned more than PLD with less volatility over the past 5 years. PSA returned 3.2% a year at 24.1% volatility, against 0.6% a year at 27.2%.
- Simply owning the S&P 500 would have done better over the past 5 years: 12.7% a year at 17.1% volatility, against 0.6% at 27.2% for PLD.
How this works
The table below lists investments that beat PLD over the past 5 years on at least one of these measures: a higher annual return with lower volatility, a higher annual return at similar volatility, a similar return with lower volatility, a higher Sharpe ratio with a smaller worst decline, a higher total return in most periods from 3 months to 10 years, or smaller losses in recent market crashes. It checks PLD's popular alternatives first, then the rest of its own and neighboring categories, then every stock and fund worth at least $500 million, and shows the strongest few in each group. The full list of those with a higher return and lower volatility than PLD follows the table.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested. Annual return, volatility and the Sharpe ratio cover 5 years; the worst decline covers the past 10 years. Green marks a better figure than PLD's. "On the frontier" means no other option shown or tested earned more with less volatility. Funds that hold the same thing are shown once. Beyond the popular alternatives, nothing with more than 1.5× PLD's volatility counts as better.
These figures cover the past 5 years. Green marks a better figure than PLD's.
| Investment | Why it is better | Past 5 years | Downside | Long run | Fit | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Annual return?higher is better | Volatility?lower is calmer | Sharpe?return per unit of risk | Worst decline?past 10 years | 10Y returntotal | Corr. with PLD?lower diversifies more | Expenseper year | |||
| +0.6% | 27.2% | 0.16 | −43.3% | +221% | 1.00 | — | |||
| +12.7% | 17.1% | 0.79 | −33.7% | +321% | 0.69 | 0.09% | |||
| Popular alternativesbest 6 shownThe investments people most often weigh against PLD. 7 of 14 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
EGPEastGroup Properties, Inc. · Industrial REITs | Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +4.4% | 23.3% | 0.30 | −38.1% | +285% | 0.89 | — | |
FRFirst Industrial Realty Trust, Inc. · Industrial REITs | Higher return, lower volatilityHigher return in most periods | +3.1% | 22.9% | 0.25 | −41.1% | +187% | 0.93 | — | |
| Higher return, similar volatilityHigher return in most periods | +6.3% | 29.4% | 0.35 | −48.5% | +154% | 0.45 | — | ||
| Higher return in most periods | +9.0% | 36.6% | 0.42 | −56.1% | +548% | 0.41 | — | ||
| Higher return in most periods | +12.0% | 32.8% | 0.52 | −66.0% | +156% | 0.47 | — | ||
TRNOTerreno Realty Corporation · Industrial REITs | Smaller losses in recent crashes | +1.4% | 24.9% | 0.18 | −39.1% | +221% | 0.91 | — | |
| Same and neighboring categories, and shared themesbest 6 shownEverything else in Industrial REITs and the categories next to it (Freight & Logistics, E-Commerce, Net Lease REITs, Self-Storage REITs), plus PLD's specific themes. 9 of 31 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
EXPDExpeditors International of Washington, Inc. · Freight & Logistics | Higher return, similar volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +12.0% | 27.1% | 0.56 | −35.6% | +349% | 0.47 | — | |
| Higher return, lower volatility | +3.2% | 24.1% | 0.25 | −37.9% | +107% | 0.74 | — | ||
WPCW. P. Carey Inc. · Net Lease REITs | Higher return, lower volatility | +2.4% | 20.6% | 0.22 | −52.4% | +89.1% | 0.64 | — | |
| Higher return in most periods | +11.7% | 32.9% | 0.50 | −53.6% | +374% | 0.54 | — | ||
EPRTEssential Properties Realty Trust, Inc. · Net Lease REITs | Higher return, lower volatility | +1.7% | 22.6% | 0.19 | −73.7% | — | 0.65 | — | |
| Similar return, lower volatility | +1.1% | 19.0% | 0.15 | −48.3% | +50.1% | 0.67 | — | ||
| The whole marketbest 8 shownEvery other stock and fund worth at least $500 million. 1,783 of 3,589 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +13.4% | 17.1% | 0.82 | −29.6% | +274% | 0.48 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +11.5% | 20.9% | 0.63 | −32.6% | +394% | 0.47 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +13.9% | 18.5% | 0.80 | −34.0% | +446% | 0.33 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +9.3% | 19.2% | 0.56 | −30.1% | +344% | 0.40 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +10.9% | 13.7% | 0.83 | −35.1% | +267% | 0.73 | 0.08% | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +5.4% | 21.8% | 0.35 | −34.3% | +240% | 0.62 | — | ||
| Higher return, similar volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +12.5% | 28.2% | 0.56 | −37.1% | +946% | 0.38 | — | ||
SCHHSchwab U.S. REIT ETF · Real Estate Equity | Similar return, lower volatilityHigher return in most periods | +1.5% | 18.8% | 0.17 | −44.2% | +44.7% | 0.84 | 0.07% | |
What these numbers mean for PLD
- Annual return
- PLD returned 0.6% a year over the past 5 years with dividends reinvested, against 12.7% a year for the S&P 500. At that pace, $10,000 became about $10,300. Annual return is the steady yearly rate that would produce the same total result, so investments held over the same span compare fairly. Guide: What is performance and return? →
- Volatility
- PLD's volatility over the past 5 years was 27.2%, 1.6 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, PLD's return lands within 27.2% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump. Guide: Understanding and measuring risk (volatility) →
- Sharpe ratio
- PLD's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.16, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so PLD earned less for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings. Guide: Balancing reward with risk (Sharpe ratio) →
- Worst decline
- PLD's worst fall from a peak to a low over the past 10 years was 43.3%, against 33.7% for the S&P 500. Losses and gains are not symmetric: climbing back from a 43.3% fall takes a 76.4% gain. Guide: Market crash risk and tail risk →
- Correlation
- Over the past 5 years, PLD's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.69 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They often move together: some diversification next to an index fund, but not a cushion. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against PLD instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a PLD holding. Guide: Correlation and diversification →
Show all 1,006 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that earned more than PLD with less volatility
Out of 3,633 tested over 5 years. The strongest 100 are listed, best first, with funds that hold the same thing listed once.
| # | Investment | Found in | Annual return | Volatility | Sharpe | Worst decline | 10Y return | Corr. with PLD | Expense |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Whole market | +13.4% | 17.1% | 0.82 | −29.6% | +274% | 0.48 | — | |
| 2 | Whole market | +11.5% | 20.9% | 0.63 | −32.6% | +394% | 0.47 | — | |
| 3 | Whole market | +13.9% | 18.5% | 0.80 | −34.0% | +446% | 0.33 | — | |
| 4 | Whole market | +9.3% | 19.2% | 0.56 | −30.1% | +344% | 0.40 | — | |
| 5 | Whole market | +10.9% | 13.7% | 0.83 | −35.1% | +267% | 0.73 | 0.08% | |
| 6 | Whole market | +5.4% | 21.8% | 0.35 | −34.3% | +240% | 0.62 | — | |
| 7 | Whole market | +6.1% | 20.0% | 0.40 | −31.6% | +270% | 0.51 | — | |
| 8 | MGVVanguard Morningstar Mega Cap Value ETF · US Large-Cap Value | Whole market | +12.6% | 13.4% | 0.95 | −35.4% | +244% | 0.66 | 0.05% |
| 9 | Whole market | +11.5% | 17.5% | 0.71 | −35.0% | +302% | 0.69 | 0.03% | |
| 10 | Whole market | +12.8% | 16.9% | 0.80 | −34.0% | +324% | 0.68 | 0.03% | |
| 11 | IOOiShares Global 100 ETF · Global Equity | Whole market | +15.7% | 17.2% | 0.94 | −31.4% | +361% | 0.65 | 0.40% |
| 12 | Whole market | +20.8% | 22.6% | 0.96 | −25.7% | +508% | 0.46 | — | |
| 13 | MOATVanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF · US Large-Cap Equity | Whole market | +9.1% | 18.4% | 0.57 | −33.3% | +276% | 0.72 | 0.46% |
| 14 | Whole market | +12.7% | 17.9% | 0.76 | −27.4% | +196% | 0.40 | — | |
| 15 | Whole market | +12.8% | 22.9% | 0.64 | −36.4% | +429% | 0.48 | — | |
| 16 | LVHIFranklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +17.0% | 11.1% | 1.48 | −32.4% | +194% | 0.61 | 0.40% |
| 17 | Whole market | +14.7% | 16.8% | 0.91 | −37.0% | +204% | 0.46 | — | |
| 18 | Whole market | +17.4% | 22.9% | 0.82 | −31.4% | +685% | 0.65 | — | |
| 19 | Whole market | +8.2% | 16.4% | 0.57 | −36.0% | +140% | 0.61 | 0.05% | |
| 20 | Whole market | +14.5% | 23.0% | 0.71 | −35.1% | +553% | 0.56 | 0.18% | |
| 21 | Whole market | +38.7% | 25.0% | 1.44 | −38.1% | +586% | 0.25 | — | |
| 22 | Whole market | +17.1% | 20.7% | 0.87 | −26.8% | +226% | 0.39 | — | |
| 23 | Whole market | +19.6% | 24.9% | 0.85 | −24.9% | +266% | 0.33 | — | |
| 24 | Whole market | +22.8% | 24.9% | 0.95 | −30.5% | +200% | 0.24 | — | |
| 25 | ILCViShares Morningstar Value ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +12.7% | 14.1% | 0.92 | −35.5% | +220% | 0.73 | 0.04% |
| 26 | Whole market | +9.3% | 16.9% | 0.61 | −35.8% | +153% | 0.65 | 0.03% | |
| 27 | PTNQPacer Trendpilot 100 ETF · Technology | Whole market | +9.7% | 14.1% | 0.73 | −28.1% | +305% | 0.40 | 0.65% |
| 28 | Whole market | +21.3% | 25.6% | 0.89 | −30.3% | +816% | 0.07 | — | |
| 29 | EQLALPS Equal Sector Weight ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +13.5% | 14.5% | 0.94 | −34.2% | +387% | 0.74 | 0.19% |
| 30 | Whole market | +24.2% | 22.8% | 1.07 | −32.4% | +406% | 0.34 | — | |
| 31 | Whole market | +9.7% | 14.3% | 0.72 | −33.4% | +252% | 0.65 | 0.06% | |
| 32 | Whole market | +17.2% | 24.9% | 0.77 | −30.4% | +285% | 0.35 | — | |
| 33 | Whole market | +10.3% | 16.2% | 0.69 | −34.2% | +223% | 0.69 | 0.06% | |
| 34 | Whole market | +5.2% | 17.5% | 0.38 | −36.4% | +102% | 0.42 | 0.06% | |
| 35 | Whole market | +11.2% | 20.8% | 0.62 | −37.4% | +319% | 0.32 | — | |
| 36 | PJULInnovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +10.5% | 8.6% | 1.20 | −18.2% | — | 0.62 | 0.79% |
| 37 | Whole market | +14.8% | 23.6% | 0.71 | −32.8% | +625% | 0.42 | — | |
| 38 | Whole market | +9.5% | 24.5% | 0.49 | −37.6% | +95.1% | 0.42 | — | |
| 39 | FJANFT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - January · Multi-Asset | Whole market | +11.1% | 10.5% | 1.05 | −13.6% | — | 0.63 | 0.85% |
| 40 | Whole market | +7.5% | 18.0% | 0.50 | −37.4% | +132% | 0.46 | — | |
| 41 | Whole market | +12.4% | 20.2% | 0.68 | −32.9% | +185% | 0.48 | — | |
| 42 | Whole market | +15.8% | 24.6% | 0.72 | −30.7% | +576% | 0.45 | — | |
| 43 | Whole market | +13.1% | 22.4% | 0.67 | −34.5% | +451% | 0.60 | 0.04% | |
| 44 | Whole market | +14.7% | 17.5% | 0.87 | −34.7% | — | 0.66 | 0.26% | |
| 45 | Whole market | +7.2% | 19.2% | 0.46 | −29.0% | +68.8% | 0.27 | — | |
| 46 | Whole market | +4.4% | 20.9% | 0.31 | −35.8% | +245% | 0.49 | — | |
| 47 | Whole market | +9.9% | 14.8% | 0.72 | −36.7% | +250% | 0.71 | 0.16% | |
| 48 | Whole market | +12.0% | 18.8% | 0.70 | −30.9% | +114% | 0.29 | — | |
| 49 | Whole market | +8.4% | 15.3% | 0.60 | −28.4% | +202% | 0.57 | 0.08% | |
| 50 | ATOAtmos Energy Corporation · Gas Utilities | Whole market | +14.9% | 18.4% | 0.85 | −32.9% | +194% | 0.51 | — |
| 51 | CHTChunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. · Integrated Telecommunications | Whole market | +7.7% | 13.3% | 0.63 | −23.8% | +101% | 0.37 | — |
| 52 | SPMOInvesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF · US Momentum Equity | Whole market | +18.7% | 20.8% | 0.93 | −30.9% | +499% | 0.45 | 0.13% |
| 53 | DFIVDimensional - International Value ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +14.8% | 16.4% | 0.93 | −25.4% | — | 0.56 | 0.27% |
| 54 | Whole market | +6.5% | 20.9% | 0.41 | −34.4% | +156% | 0.35 | — | |
| 55 | AVLVAvantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF · US Large-Cap Value | Whole market | +14.0% | 16.9% | 0.86 | −19.5% | — | 0.67 | 0.15% |
| 56 | NINiSource Inc · Gas Utilities | Whole market | +15.1% | 20.3% | 0.80 | −30.9% | +158% | 0.40 | — |
| 57 | WECWEC Energy Group, Inc. · Electric Utilities | Whole market | +7.2% | 19.0% | 0.46 | −32.3% | +159% | 0.39 | — |
| 58 | DFATDimensional - US Targeted Value ETF · US Small-Cap Equity | Whole market | +9.6% | 21.0% | 0.54 | −26.1% | — | 0.64 | 0.33% |
| 59 | DGXQuest Diagnostics Incorporated · Medical Diagnostics | Whole market | +12.3% | 22.5% | 0.63 | −36.6% | +243% | 0.30 | — |
| 60 | FTSFortis Inc. · Electric Utilities | Whole market | +8.4% | 16.4% | 0.58 | −34.3% | +154% | 0.43 | — |
| 61 | DGRWWisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund · US Dividend Equity | Whole market | +11.8% | 14.0% | 0.87 | −32.0% | +276% | 0.73 | 0.28% |
| 62 | USMViShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF · US Low-Volatility Equity | Whole market | +7.6% | 12.3% | 0.66 | −33.1% | +176% | 0.70 | 0.15% |
| 63 | AVEMAvantis Emerging Markets Equity ETF · Emerging Markets Equity | Whole market | +9.3% | 19.5% | 0.56 | −36.0% | — | 0.41 | 0.33% |
| 64 | SPHQInvesco S&P 500 Quality ETF · US Quality Equity | Whole market | +12.0% | 16.7% | 0.76 | −31.6% | +300% | 0.64 | 0.20% |
| 65 | PKGPackaging Corporation of America · Packaging | Whole market | +15.4% | 25.8% | 0.69 | −38.2% | +294% | 0.45 | — |
| 66 | AEEAmeren Corporation · Electric Utilities | Whole market | +7.9% | 19.4% | 0.49 | −29.1% | +192% | 0.40 | — |
| 67 | DTMDT Midstream, Inc. · Oil & Gas Midstream | Whole market | +24.5% | 25.2% | 1.00 | −23.6% | — | 0.21 | — |
| 68 | EWJiShares MSCI Japan ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +9.2% | 18.8% | 0.57 | −33.1% | +132% | 0.54 | 0.49% |
| 69 | WTWWillis Towers Watson Public Limited Company · Insurance | Whole market | +6.9% | 23.9% | 0.40 | −32.9% | +187% | 0.33 | — |
| 70 | XLUState Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF · Utilities Equity | Whole market | +7.8% | 17.4% | 0.52 | −36.0% | +138% | 0.49 | 0.08% |
| 71 | SDYState Street SPDR S&P Dividend ETF · US Dividend Equity | Whole market | +7.6% | 14.0% | 0.59 | −36.7% | +157% | 0.68 | 0.35% |
| 72 | BUFRFT Vest Laddered Buffer ETF · Buffered Equity | Whole market | +9.9% | 10.5% | 0.96 | −13.7% | — | 0.66 | 0.10% |
| 73 | VOTVanguard Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF · US Mid-Cap Equity | Whole market | +3.6% | 21.7% | 0.27 | −37.2% | +201% | 0.65 | 0.05% |
| 74 | Whole market | +17.3% | 18.2% | 0.97 | −40.0% | +352% | 0.47 | — | |
| 75 | RWLInvesco S&P 500 Revenue ETF · US Large-Cap Equity | Whole market | +13.7% | 14.4% | 0.97 | −36.1% | +287% | 0.72 | 0.39% |
| 76 | Whole market | +15.9% | 23.4% | 0.75 | −42.0% | +393% | 0.25 | — | |
| 77 | DBEFXtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +13.1% | 13.8% | 0.96 | −32.5% | +206% | 0.67 | 0.35% |
| 78 | CMSCMS Energy Corporation · Electric Utilities | Whole market | +5.6% | 19.0% | 0.38 | −29.6% | +123% | 0.37 | — |
| 79 | JQUAJPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF · US Quality Equity | Whole market | +13.6% | 15.7% | 0.89 | −32.9% | — | 0.70 | 0.12% |
| 80 | DIVOAmplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF · Equity Income | Whole market | +11.1% | 11.9% | 0.95 | −30.0% | — | 0.68 | 0.56% |
| 81 | LNTAlliant Energy Corporation · Electric Utilities | Whole market | +7.3% | 19.8% | 0.46 | −33.5% | +150% | 0.40 | — |
| 82 | XLPState Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF · Consumer Staples | Whole market | +7.2% | 13.8% | 0.57 | −24.5% | +121% | 0.60 | 0.08% |
| 83 | Whole market | +3.8% | 0.3% | 13.25 | −0.3% | — | 0.01 | 0.09% | |
| 84 | Whole market | +42.1% | 24.7% | 1.55 | −46.1% | +349% | 0.25 | — | |
| 85 | ACTEnact Holdings Inc. · Insurance | Whole market | +20.5% | 24.3% | 0.89 | −20.2% | — | 0.42 | — |
| 86 | EMAEmera Incorporated · Electric Utilities | Whole market | +5.0% | 24.4% | 0.32 | −35.9% | +108% | 0.56 | — |
| 87 | QYLDGlobal X - Nasdaq 100 Covered Call ETF · Equity Income | Whole market | +8.4% | 15.0% | 0.62 | −24.7% | +156% | 0.61 | 0.60% |
| 88 | BBEUJPMorgan BetaBuilders Europe ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +8.9% | 17.5% | 0.57 | −36.3% | — | 0.64 | 0.09% |
| 89 | FLTWFranklin FTSE Taiwan ETF · Technology | Whole market | +21.8% | 24.3% | 0.94 | −38.0% | — | 0.38 | 0.19% |
| 90 | SCIService Corporation International · Death Care | Whole market | +7.5% | 25.2% | 0.41 | −34.0% | +272% | 0.56 | — |
| 91 | USMCPrincipal U.S. Mega-Cap ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +14.1% | 16.4% | 0.89 | −30.0% | — | 0.65 | 0.12% |
| 92 | RSPTInvesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF · Technology Equity | Whole market | +16.9% | 25.1% | 0.75 | −33.7% | +572% | 0.57 | 0.40% |
| 93 | GGGGraco Inc. · Industrial Machinery | Whole market | +3.5% | 22.9% | 0.26 | −30.6% | +263% | 0.57 | — |
| 94 | GCOWPacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF · International | Whole market | +14.1% | 13.6% | 1.04 | −37.6% | +168% | 0.53 | 0.60% |
| 95 | IDAIDACORP, Inc. · Electric Utilities | Whole market | +8.8% | 19.2% | 0.54 | −34.3% | +141% | 0.35 | — |
| 96 | FTCSFirst Trust Capital Strength ETF · US Quality Equity | Whole market | +6.2% | 13.2% | 0.52 | −31.9% | +188% | 0.70 | 0.53% |
| 97 | XMMOInvesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF · US Mid-Cap Equity | Whole market | +10.5% | 22.0% | 0.56 | −36.7% | +390% | 0.60 | 0.34% |
| 98 | TDIVFirst Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund · Technology Equity | Whole market | +16.2% | 21.3% | 0.81 | −32.0% | +388% | 0.55 | 0.50% |
| 99 | Whole market | +23.5% | 18.8% | 1.22 | −75.2% | +350% | 0.37 | — | |
| 100 | XLBState Street Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF · Materials Equity | Whole market | +5.8% | 19.1% | 0.39 | −37.3% | +166% | 0.67 | 0.08% |
PLD against its popular alternatives
The investments people most often weigh against PLD, compared period by period and year by year.
How do PLD's risk and return compare with its alternatives?
This map plots each investment's annual return over the past 5 years against its volatility, the size of its typical price swings. Investments toward the upper left earned more for a smoother ride, and those toward the lower right earned less for a rougher one. The dashed lines cross at PLD, which divides the map into what did better or worse on each measure.
- Four of the 14 popular alternatives, led by EGP, FR and TRNO, were both more rewarding and calmer than PLD over the past 5 years, earning a higher annual return with lower volatility.
- Over the past 5 years, PLD returned 0.6% a year, less than the S&P 500's 12.7%, with higher volatility (27.2% against 17.1%).
Green points earned more than PLD with less volatility; red points earned less with more. Hover over a point for its figures. Total returns with dividends reinvested, annualized.
All figures
| Investment | Annual return | Volatility |
|---|---|---|
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | +12.7% | 17.1% |
| FDX FedEx Corporation | +12.0% | 32.8% |
| AMZN Amazon.com, Inc. | +9.0% | 36.6% |
| DLR Digital Realty Trust, Inc. | +6.3% | 29.4% |
| EGP EastGroup Properties, Inc. | +4.4% | 23.3% |
| FR First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc. | +3.1% | 22.9% |
| TRNO Terreno Realty Corporation | +1.4% | 24.9% |
| LXP LXP Industrial Trust | +1.3% | 25.2% |
| PLD This pagePrologis, Inc. | +0.6% | 27.2% |
| STAG STAG Industrial, Inc. | +0.6% | 23.5% |
| REXR Rexford Industrial Realty, Inc. | −7.1% | 27.7% |
| UPS United Parcel Service, Inc. | −8.6% | 28.9% |
| COLD Americold Realty Trust, Inc. | −10.6% | 33.5% |
| GXO GXO Logistics, Inc. | −10.9% | 42.2% |
| IIPR Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc. | −19.6% | 41.5% |
| ILPT Industrial Logistics Properties Trust | −22.4% | 57.6% |
Has PLD consistently beaten its popular alternatives?
This section compares PLD with the investments people most often weigh against it, checking each one over eight periods from one month to ten years. Counting how often an alternative earned more than PLD helps separate lasting outperformance from a single strong stretch.
- Six of the 15 popular alternatives, led by AMZN, EGP and FDX, outperformed PLD in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes.
- AMZN and EGP outperformed PLD in every long-term period and in all but one short-term period, the most consistent record in the group.
- EGP, FR and TRNO earned more for the risk they took than PLD (a higher Sharpe ratio) and fell less in their worst decline of the past 10 years.
A green cell means the alternative earned more than PLD over that period. "Qualified" marks those that did so in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods.
| Investment | Periods outperformed | Short term | Long term | Risk · 5 years | Fund | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1M | 3M | 6M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | 10Y | Volatilitylower is calmer | Sharpehigher is better | Worst declinepast 10 years | Expense | Assets | Overlapsame sectors | ||
| PLD Prologis, Inc. (this page) | — | −6.1% | −12.9% | −10.8% | +1.1% | +3.4% | +37.1% | +3.0% | +221% | 27.2% | 0.16 | −43.3% | — | $121B | — |
| AMZN QualifiedAmazon.com, Inc. | 5/5 short3/3 longAll-weather | +1.6% | +5.1% | +5.8% | +16.0% | +21.3% | +110% | +53.8% | +548% | 36.6% | 0.42 | −56.1% | — | $2.8T | — |
| EGP QualifiedEastGroup Properties, Inc. | 5/5 short3/3 longAll-weather | +0.2% | −8.2% | +0.7% | +14.7% | +13.9% | +41.4% | +24.1% | +285% | 23.3% | 0.30 | −38.1% | — | $11B | — |
| FDX QualifiedFedEx Corporation | 5/5 short2/3 long | +1.0% | −2.1% | −5.4% | +27.6% | +56.7% | +63.1% | +76.6% | +156% | 32.8% | 0.52 | −66.0% | — | $71B | — |
| LXP QualifiedLXP Industrial Trust | 5/5 short2/3 long | +0.3% | +0.4% | +18.9% | +26.7% | +31.3% | +75.1% | +6.7% | +107% | 25.2% | 0.18 | −47.2% | — | $3.6B | — |
| FR QualifiedFirst Industrial Realty Trust, Inc. | 4/5 short2/3 long | −3.7% | −12.5% | −6.6% | +4.8% | +9.1% | +53.5% | +16.4% | +187% | 22.9% | 0.25 | −41.1% | — | $7.8B | — |
| DLR QualifiedDigital Realty Trust, Inc. | 3/5 short2/3 long | −5.9% | +0.1% | −12.9% | +15.4% | +4.3% | +65.7% | +35.7% | +154% | 29.4% | 0.35 | −48.5% | — | $65B | — |
| TRNO REIT - IndustrialTerreno Realty Corporation | 5/5 short1/3 long | −0.8% | −11.1% | −1.1% | +13.4% | +8.7% | +37.4% | +7.2% | +221% | 24.9% | 0.18 | −39.1% | — | $7.1B | — |
| ILPT REIT - IndustrialIndustrial Logistics Properties Trust | 3/5 short1/3 long | −9.7% | −17.8% | +13.4% | +31.1% | +29.7% | +222% | −71.8% | — | 57.6% | -0.16 | −93.8% | — | $464M | — |
| UPS Integrated Freight & LogisticsUnited Parcel Service, Inc. | 5/5 short0/3 long | +4.0% | −11.5% | −5.0% | +2.2% | +20.8% | −23.0% | −36.1% | +35.4% | 28.9% | -0.17 | −57.9% | — | $74B | — |
| COLD REIT - IndustrialAmericold Realty Trust, Inc. | 5/5 short0/3 long | −2.8% | −7.4% | +12.4% | +14.5% | +10.5% | −38.7% | −42.8% | — | 33.5% | -0.17 | −70.8% | — | $4.0B | — |
| STAG REIT - IndustrialSTAG Industrial, Inc. | 4/5 short0/3 long | −1.4% | −11.6% | −6.4% | +2.3% | −1.7% | +27.0% | +2.9% | +145% | 23.5% | 0.14 | −45.1% | — | $7.1B | — |
| IIPR REIT - IndustrialInnovative Industrial Properties, Inc. | 4/5 short0/3 long | −2.6% | −15.0% | +6.0% | +18.4% | +11.4% | +0.3% | −66.4% | — | 41.5% | -0.32 | −78.4% | — | $1.5B | — |
| REXR REIT - IndustrialRexford Industrial Realty, Inc. | 3/5 short0/3 long | −3.0% | +1.7% | +1.6% | −1.2% | −11.9% | −4.4% | −30.9% | +120% | 27.7% | -0.13 | −58.7% | — | $8.5B | — |
| GXO Integrated Freight & LogisticsGXO Logistics, Inc. | 2/5 short0/3 long | +5.9% | −8.9% | −18.8% | −11.4% | −12.3% | −8.0% | −43.8% | — | 42.2% | -0.06 | −69.6% | — | $5.5B | — |
| LINE REIT - IndustrialLineage, Inc. | 1/5 short0/3 long | −6.8% | −19.1% | −6.0% | +1.6% | −10.4% | — | — | — | — | — | −61.7% | — | $7.8B | — |
How did PLD do year by year?
This table shows each investment's total return in every full calendar year since 1998, along with where PLD ranked among its popular alternatives each year. Annual results reveal how consistently each one kept pace with PLD and how far its good and bad years diverged, detail that multiyear averages tend to smooth over.
- Ranked against its popular alternatives each year, PLD finished in the top quarter in five of 28 years and in the bottom quarter in no. In 2025, it ranked 3 of 16.
- PLD finished ahead of the S&P 500 in 15 of its 28 full calendar years.
- Among its popular alternatives, DLR came out ahead of PLD most often, in 13 of the 21 years both traded.
Newest year first. Green marks a year in which the fund came out ahead of PLD; gray means the two finished within a fraction of a point. The rank row places PLD among the alternatives that traded the full year; dark green is the top quarter and red the bottom quarter.
| Investment | Years ahead of PLD | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | 1998 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PLD This pagePrologis, Inc. | — | +25.1% | −18.1% | +21.6% | −31.3% | +72.3% | +14.7% | +55.9% | −6.2% | +25.9% | +27.4% | +3.6% | +20.3% | +4.3% | +31.9% | −6.4% | +29.4% | +15.6% | −58.0% | +1.6% | +23.3% | +26.8% | +28.6% | +27.0% | +11.5% | +7.4% | +37.8% | −3.1% | −7.0% |
| Rank among alternatives | Top quarter in 5 of 28 | 3 of 16 | 10 of 15 | 8 of 15 | 6 of 15 | 1 of 14 | 6 of 14 | 4 of 14 | 9 of 12 | 6 of 12 | 8 of 11 | 6 of 11 | 6 of 11 | 8 of 10 | 5 of 10 | 7 of 9 | 5 of 8 | 5 of 8 | 6 of 8 | 3 of 8 | 4 of 8 | 2 of 8 | 3 of 7 | 5 of 7 | 4 of 7 | 4 of 7 | 2 of 7 | 4 of 6 | 3 of 6 |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 13 of 28 | +17.7% | +24.9% | +26.2% | −18.2% | +28.7% | +18.3% | +31.2% | −4.6% | +21.7% | +12.0% | +1.2% | +13.5% | +32.3% | +16.0% | +1.9% | +15.1% | +26.4% | −36.8% | +5.1% | +15.9% | +4.8% | +10.7% | +28.2% | −21.6% | −11.7% | −9.8% | +20.4% | +28.7% |
| AMZN Amazon.com, Inc. | 17 of 28 | +5.2% | +44.4% | +80.9% | −49.6% | +2.4% | +76.3% | +23.0% | +28.4% | +56.0% | +10.9% | +118% | −22.2% | +59.0% | +45.0% | −3.9% | +33.7% | +163% | −44.7% | +135% | −16.5% | +6.8% | −16.0% | +178% | +74.6% | −30.5% | −79.6% | +42.2% | +968% |
| EGP EastGroup Properties, Inc. | 11 of 28 | +14.8% | −9.8% | +27.7% | −33.1% | +68.4% | +6.8% | +48.3% | +7.0% | +23.3% | +37.8% | −8.5% | +13.3% | +11.8% | +28.9% | +8.1% | +16.6% | +14.6% | −10.7% | −18.4% | +23.5% | +23.3% | +25.2% | +35.9% | +19.0% | +11.8% | +30.5% | +8.9% | −8.7% |
| FDX FedEx Corporation | 11 of 28 | +5.1% | +13.5% | +49.1% | −31.6% | +0.7% | +74.3% | −4.8% | −34.7% | +35.2% | +26.1% | −13.7% | +21.4% | +57.6% | +10.5% | −9.7% | +12.1% | +31.1% | −27.7% | −17.6% | +5.4% | +5.3% | +46.4% | +24.9% | +4.8% | +61.0% | −2.4% | −8.2% | +46.0% |
| LXP LXP Industrial Trust | 10 of 28 | +29.7% | −13.2% | +4.3% | −33.0% | +52.3% | +4.2% | +34.9% | −7.1% | −4.2% | +44.9% | −21.2% | +14.5% | +3.2% | +48.0% | 0.0% | +38.5% | +25.1% | −62.3% | −22.1% | +14.7% | −0.1% | +18.9% | +35.8% | +10.7% | +42.3% | +41.9% | −19.7% | −12.3% |
| FR First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc. | 13 of 28 | +18.2% | −2.0% | +11.9% | −25.4% | +60.3% | +4.2% | +47.4% | −5.6% | +15.5% | +30.6% | +10.2% | +20.4% | +26.6% | +37.6% | +16.9% | +67.6% | −30.8% | −75.7% | −20.7% | +30.1% | +1.5% | +29.5% | +31.5% | −1.9% | −0.2% | +34.6% | +12.4% | −20.0% |
| DLR Digital Realty Trust, Inc. | 13 of 21 | −10.1% | +35.9% | +39.9% | −41.0% | +30.7% | +20.4% | +16.5% | −3.0% | +18.7% | +34.9% | +20.2% | +42.6% | −23.5% | +6.1% | +35.4% | +6.1% | +58.8% | −11.4% | +15.7% | +57.2% | +77.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| TRNO Terreno Realty Corporation | 5 of 15 | +2.7% | −2.8% | +13.4% | −31.6% | +48.5% | +10.4% | +57.2% | +2.9% | +26.2% | +29.7% | +13.2% | +19.9% | +17.9% | +5.8% | −13.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ILPT Industrial Logistics Properties Trust | 2 of 7 | +55.7% | −21.6% | +46.0% | −86.5% | +13.3% | +10.7% | +21.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| UPS United Parcel Service, Inc. | 7 of 26 | −15.9% | −15.9% | −6.0% | −16.2% | +30.0% | +48.6% | +24.2% | −15.5% | +7.1% | +22.7% | −10.9% | +8.7% | +46.5% | +3.9% | +3.8% | +30.3% | +7.8% | −19.8% | −3.5% | +1.8% | −10.5% | +16.4% | +19.9% | +17.3% | −6.0% | −13.8% | — | — |
| COLD Americold Realty Trust, Inc. | 1 of 7 | −36.2% | −26.7% | +10.1% | −10.9% | −9.9% | +9.0% | +40.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| STAG STAG Industrial, Inc. | 8 of 14 | +13.3% | −10.3% | +26.6% | −29.6% | +59.1% | +4.1% | +33.2% | −3.8% | +20.6% | +38.3% | −19.6% | +27.0% | +20.2% | +68.2% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| IIPR Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc. | 4 of 9 | −18.4% | −28.5% | +8.8% | −59.0% | +47.5% | +151% | +72.5% | +45.0% | +82.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| REXR Rexford Industrial Realty, Inc. | 6 of 12 | +4.7% | −28.5% | +5.6% | −31.2% | +67.8% | +9.7% | +57.8% | +3.2% | +28.6% | +45.6% | +7.7% | +23.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| GXO GXO Logistics, Inc. | 1 of 4 | +21.0% | −28.9% | +43.3% | −53.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| LINE Lineage, Inc. | 0 of 1 | −37.2% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Risk and diversification
How PLD has fallen, how it held up in crashes beside the S&P 500 and its popular alternatives, and what moves independently of it.
What were PLD's worst declines?
A drawdown is the decline from a peak to the lowest point before a new high. This section presents PLD's five deepest drawdowns since it began trading in 1997, alongside the S&P 500's return over the same dates, and how long each took to recover. Together, these figures show how much an investor could have lost and how long it took to get back to even.
- In all five of PLD's worst declines, the S&P 500 held up better over the same dates.
- Not every decline was the market's doing: PLD fell 43.3% from April 2022 to April 2025, while the S&P 500 rose 21.2%.
- The slowest recovery came after PLD fell 84.7% from October 2007 to March 2009; it did not regain that peak until May 2016, seven years later.
Green means PLD fell less than the S&P 500 over the same dates. Based on daily closing prices with dividends reinvested.
| During | PLD fell | S&P 500, same dates | Peak | Low | Time to the low | Back at the peak | Time to recover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 financial crisis | −84.7% | −54.4% | Oct 2007 | Mar 2009 | 17 months | May 2016 | 7.2 years |
| 2022 bear market | −43.3% | +21.3% | Apr 2022 | Apr 2025 | 3 years | Not yet | — |
| Covid crash | −36.2% | −31.0% | Feb 2020 | Mar 2020 | 1 month | Jul 2020 | 4 months |
| No named crash | −23.6% | +41.3% | Sep 1998 | Dec 1999 | 15 months | Jun 2000 | 6 months |
| No named crash | −23.0% | −1.7% | Feb 2007 | Aug 2007 | 6 months | Oct 2007 | 2 months |
How did PLD do in stock market crashes?
This section measures how far PLD, the S&P 500 and each alternative fell from peak to trough during every major market crash since 2000. A smaller decline means an investment held up better, and comparing results across crashes shows whether that resilience was consistent or a one-off.
- PLD fell further than the S&P 500 in eight of the ten crashes it has traded through. The clearest case was the 2008 financial crisis, when PLD fell 84.7% and the S&P 500 fell 55.2%.
- Among its popular alternatives, COLD held up best, falling less than PLD in all five crashes they both traded through.
Newest crash first. Each figure is the fund's deepest fall within the crash window; green means a smaller fall than PLD.
| Investment | Held up better | 2023 regional bank crisisMar 2023 | 2022 bear marketJan 2022 | Covid crashFeb 2020 | Late-2018 sell-offSep 2018 | February 2018 volatility shockFeb 2018 | 2015 China and oil sell-offAug 2015 | 2011 euro debt crisisJul 2011 | 2010 flash crashMay 2010 | 2008 financial crisisOct 2007 | Dot-com bustMar 2000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PLD This pagePrologis, Inc. | — | −6.5% | −42.1% | −36.2% | −17.9% | −8.6% | −18.4% | −36.2% | −4.2% | −84.7% | −17.1% |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 8 of 10 | −3.4% | −24.5% | −33.7% | −19.3% | −6.5% | −12.8% | −17.9% | −1.5% | −55.2% | −47.5% |
| AMZN Amazon.com, Inc. | 7 of 10 | −3.4% | −39.6% | −22.7% | −33.2% | −7.1% | −30.6% | −20.7% | −2.9% | −65.3% | −91.8% |
| EGP EastGroup Properties, Inc. | 7 of 10 | −5.7% | −36.5% | −38.1% | −12.6% | −8.5% | −14.8% | −25.0% | −1.7% | −56.6% | −19.0% |
| FDX FedEx Corporation | 5 of 10 | −5.3% | −45.3% | −44.9% | −38.1% | −8.0% | −27.0% | −29.7% | −3.3% | −67.8% | −30.0% |
| LXP LXP Industrial Trust | 6 of 10 | −3.6% | −44.3% | −30.9% | −10.3% | −6.2% | −25.8% | −33.8% | −4.3% | −88.0% | −13.7% |
| FR First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc. | 4 of 10 | −5.5% | −32.1% | −40.9% | −14.8% | −8.4% | −15.8% | −38.1% | −6.0% | −94.8% | −21.5% |
| DLR Digital Realty Trust, Inc. | 8 of 9 | −3.1% | −45.7% | −24.1% | −14.6% | −8.1% | −8.4% | −20.2% | −1.7% | −56.8% | — |
| TRNO Terreno Realty Corporation | 6 of 8 | −4.8% | −37.3% | −30.7% | −13.5% | −8.2% | −10.4% | −28.5% | −5.4% | — | — |
| ILPT Industrial Logistics Properties Trust | 1 of 5 | −12.7% | −81.7% | −44.0% | −18.7% | −3.0% | — | — | — | — | — |
| UPS United Parcel Service, Inc. | 7 of 10 | −1.5% | −29.8% | −18.5% | −23.7% | −8.7% | −16.4% | −16.4% | −1.6% | −47.9% | −26.5% |
| COLD Americold Realty Trust, Inc. | 5 of 5 | −3.5% | −28.2% | −35.6% | −12.9% | −2.8% | — | — | — | — | — |
| STAG STAG Industrial, Inc. | 3 of 7 | −6.2% | −40.1% | −43.6% | −15.6% | −8.6% | −26.9% | −22.3% | — | — | — |
| IIPR Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc. | 1 of 5 | −7.5% | −62.2% | −56.5% | −20.8% | −1.8% | — | — | — | — | — |
| REXR Rexford Industrial Realty, Inc. | 3 of 6 | −7.1% | −38.9% | −36.4% | −14.4% | −8.5% | −10.5% | — | — | — | — |
| GXO GXO Logistics, Inc. | 0 of 2 | −11.4% | −62.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
How closely does PLD move with the S&P 500?
Upside capture measures how much of the S&P 500's gains an investment kept in the months the market rose, and downside capture how much of its losses it took in the months the market fell. An investment that captures more of the gains than the losses has compounded ahead of the market over time. This section compares PLD with its popular alternatives on both measures, and on beta (how strongly each has moved with the market), over the past 10 years.
- TRNO took just 92% of the S&P 500's losses, against 122% for PLD, while still keeping 86% of its gains.
- Over the past 10 years, PLD captured 103% of the S&P 500's gains in rising months and 122% of its losses in falling months, with a beta of 1.04. It amplified the market's moves in both directions.
- Four of the ten popular alternatives had a higher capture ratio (upside capture divided by downside capture) than PLD's 0.84, led by DLR, EGP and AMZN.
Monthly total returns over the past 10 years, measured against SPY. 100% capture or a beta of 1.00 means moving in line with the S&P 500. Green marks a better figure than PLD's: more upside, less downside or a higher capture ratio. Sorted by capture ratio.
| Investment | Upside capture | Downside capture | Capture ratio | Beta |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PLD This pagePrologis, Inc. | 103% | 122% | 0.84 | 1.04 |
| DLR Digital Realty Trust, Inc. | 64% | 64% | 1.00 | 0.60 |
| EGP EastGroup Properties, Inc. | 91% | 93% | 0.98 | 0.88 |
| AMZN Amazon.com, Inc. | 134% | 139% | 0.96 | 1.31 |
| TRNO Terreno Realty Corporation | 86% | 92% | 0.93 | 0.81 |
| FR First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc. | 93% | 113% | 0.82 | 0.96 |
| STAG STAG Industrial, Inc. | 85% | 110% | 0.77 | 0.94 |
| LXP LXP Industrial Trust | 78% | 106% | 0.74 | 0.82 |
| REXR Rexford Industrial Realty, Inc. | 90% | 127% | 0.71 | 0.93 |
| FDX FedEx Corporation | 116% | 166% | 0.70 | 1.29 |
| UPS United Parcel Service, Inc. | 85% | 149% | 0.57 | 1.08 |
What diversifies PLD?
Correlation measures how closely two investments move together, on a scale from 1 (in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to -1 (in opposite directions). This section lists large ETFs and stocks whose returns have had a low correlation with PLD's. Because such investments tend not to fall at the same time, pairing PLD with them can reduce a portfolio's overall swings.
- Moving a fifth of the money in PLD into DXJ would have cut the portfolio's volatility by 17% over the past 5 years and raised its annual return (+3.7% for PLD alone, +8.8% for the mix).
- Among large ETFs, DXJ, MLPX and SMH have moved largely independently of PLD over the past 5 years, with correlations of 0.41 or lower, and each still earned a positive 5-year return.
- XLE made money in four of the seven calendar years in which PLD lost money.
Only ETFs with at least $1.0B in assets and stocks worth at least $10B, with a correlation below 0.5 over the past 5 years and a positive return, are included, ranked by Sharpe ratio; funds that hold the same thing are shown once. The year columns are the years in which PLD lost money. The last two columns show a portfolio that is 80% PLD and 20% the other investment, rebalanced monthly.
ETFs
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2024 | 2022 | 2018 | 2011 | 2008 | 1999 | 1998 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PLD Prologis, Inc. (this page) | 1.00 | +3.0% | 0.16 | −18.1% | −31.3% | −6.2% | −6.4% | −58.0% | −3.1% | −7.0% | 29.9% | +3.7% |
| DXJ InternationalWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund | 0.29 | +225% | 1.34 | +29.8% | +6.0% | −19.8% | −16.1% | −20.8% | — | — | 24.8% | +8.8% |
| MLPX EnergyGlobal X - MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF | 0.37 | +135% | 0.97 | +42.9% | +21.5% | −15.5% | — | — | — | — | 25.5% | +7.6% |
| SMH TechnologyVanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.41 | +323% | 0.97 | +39.1% | −33.5% | −9.1% | +6.8% | −44.7% | — | — | 27.5% | +10.8% |
| GLD CommoditiesSPDR Gold Shares | 0.22 | +126% | 0.96 | +26.7% | −0.8% | −1.9% | +9.6% | +4.9% | — | — | 24.9% | +7.3% |
| SPMO Broad MarketInvesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 0.45 | +136% | 0.93 | +45.8% | −10.4% | −0.9% | — | — | — | — | 26.0% | +7.7% |
| XLE EnergyState Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | 0.23 | +177% | 0.93 | +5.6% | +64.4% | −18.2% | +2.8% | −39.0% | +18.1% | — | 25.6% | +8.4% |
| EWT TechnologyiShares MSCI Taiwan ETF | 0.39 | +153% | 0.89 | +16.1% | −28.9% | −9.9% | −21.8% | −45.3% | — | — | 26.3% | +7.9% |
| EUFN InternationaliShares MSCI Europe Financials ETF | 0.49 | +133% | 0.89 | +17.2% | −8.8% | −23.1% | −26.6% | — | — | — | 26.2% | +7.6% |
Stocks
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2024 | 2022 | 2018 | 2011 | 2008 | 1999 | 1998 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PLD Prologis, Inc. (this page) | 1.00 | +3.0% | 0.16 | −18.1% | −31.3% | −6.2% | −6.4% | −58.0% | −3.1% | −7.0% | 29.9% | +3.7% |
| CAH Medical - DistributionCardinal Health, Inc. | 0.25 | +479% | 1.55 | +19.0% | +54.1% | −24.5% | +8.1% | −39.6% | −36.8% | +51.7% | 25.8% | +10.8% |
| CLS Hardware, Equipment & PartsCelestica Inc. | 0.31 | +3,143% | 1.47 | +215% | +1.3% | −16.3% | −24.4% | −20.5% | +350% | — | 29.7% | +22.5% |
| FIX Engineering & ConstructionComfort Systems USA, Inc. | 0.37 | +1,636% | 1.46 | +107% | +17.0% | +0.8% | −17.0% | −15.2% | −58.7% | −9.5% | 28.5% | +18.8% |
| MCK Medical - DistributionMcKesson Corporation | 0.25 | +413% | 1.44 | +23.7% | +51.8% | −28.4% | +11.8% | −40.4% | −71.3% | +46.9% | 25.6% | +10.3% |
| MPC Oil & Gas Refining & MarketingMarathon Petroleum Corporation | 0.19 | +690% | 1.41 | −4.0% | +86.6% | −8.2% | — | — | — | — | 25.9% | +12.9% |
Common questions
What was PLD's worst drawdown?
PLD's deepest decline since it began trading in 1997 was 84.7%, from October 2007 to March 2009. It took about seven years from the low to climb back to its old high.
What were PLD's best and worst years?
Over 28 full calendar years, PLD's best year was 2021, when it returned 72.3%. Its worst was 2008, with a return of -58.0%.
Is there a better investment than PLD?
Among PLD's popular alternatives, EGP and FR earned more than PLD with less volatility over the past 5 years. EGP returned 4.4% a year at 23.3% volatility, against 0.6% a year at 27.2%. Looking beyond its popular alternatives, PSA (self-storage reits) and WPC (net lease reits) earned more than PLD with less volatility over the past 5 years. PSA returned 3.2% a year at 24.1% volatility, against 0.6% a year at 27.2%.
Is PLD more volatile than the S&P 500?
Yes. PLD's volatility over the past 5 years was 27.2%, 1.6 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, PLD's return lands within 27.2% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump.
What is PLD's Sharpe ratio?
PLD's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.16, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so PLD earned less for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings.
How correlated is PLD with the S&P 500?
Over the past 5 years, PLD's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.69 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They often move together: some diversification next to an index fund, but not a cushion. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against PLD instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a PLD holding.
What are the best alternatives to PLD?
Of the 15 popular alternatives we compared, six outperformed PLD in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes, with dividends reinvested: AMZN, EGP and FDX.
Did PLD outperform the S&P 500?
PLD finished ahead of the S&P 500 (SPY) in 15 of 28 full calendar years. In 2025, it returned +25.1%, against +17.7% for the index.
How did PLD do in stock market crashes?
PLD fell less than the S&P 500 (SPY) in two of the ten major crashes it has traded through, and further in eight. The clearest case was the 2008 financial crisis, when PLD fell 84.7% and the S&P 500 fell 55.2%.
What diversifies PLD?
These had a low correlation with PLD over the past 5 years and still earned a positive 5-year return: among large ETFs, DXJ (correlation 0.29), MLPX (correlation 0.37) and SMH (correlation 0.41); among large stocks, CAH (correlation 0.25), CLS (correlation 0.31) and FIX (correlation 0.37). A correlation near zero means the two have moved largely independently.
How we measure
- Short-term periods are 1M, 3M, 6M, YTD, 1Y; long-term periods are 3Y, 5Y, 10Y. An investment outperformed in a period when its total return, with dividends reinvested, was higher than PLD's. Returns within 0.5 points or 3% of PLD's, whichever is larger, count as a tie.
- "Qualified" means outperforming in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods. "All-weather" means outperforming in every long-term period and all but one short-term period.
- Popular alternatives are the funds and stocks most often compared with this one. We include only those that trade today, are not leveraged or inverse, and hold at least $200 million.
- Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily returns over 5 years, a measure of how much the price typically swings in a year. The Sharpe ratio is the return above cash for each unit of that volatility.
- A decline, or drawdown, runs from a peak to the lowest close before the next high. The worst decline ever uses all the price history we have; comparisons between funds use the past 10 years so that younger funds are judged on the same stretch.
- Sector overlap is the share of assets two funds hold in the same sectors. Correlation and the mixed-portfolio figures use monthly returns.
- Upside and downside capture follow Morningstar's definition: the compound monthly return in the months the S&P 500 rose (or fell), divided by the S&P 500's compound return in those months. Beta measures how strongly monthly returns have moved with the S&P 500. All three use the same window for every investment.
- Figures are computed from daily adjusted prices and update after each trading day. Past performance does not predict future results.