Relative Intelligence · Bitcoin

How Grayscale Bitcoin Trust ETF (GBTC) compares with the whole market and its popular alternatives
Built by QuantCommons' quantitative engine, this page is about relative opportunity, not data on GBTC alone. It places GBTC (Grayscale Bitcoin Trust ETF) against 15 popular alternatives, its neighboring categories and the entire market of over 10,000 U.S.-listed stocks and ETFs, and surfaces what has done better on consistent outperformance, return for the risk taken, behavior in real market crashes and diversification. The result is a clearer view of where GBTC stands in the market, and of the alternatives worth a closer look.
Period covered: GBTC's full trading record, from May 2015 through September 2026. The crash tests reach back to 2000 using older funds and the S&P 500. All returns include reinvested dividends. Data as of October 20, 2026.
Data as of October 20, 2026. Full tables and charts read best on a larger screen.
On this page11 sections
Key findings
- What you're buyingGBTC charges 1.50% a year; BTC (Grayscale Bitcoin Mini Trust ETF) tracks the same thing for 0.15%. Better options ↓
- Right nowOver the past 3 months, GBTC rose 26.3% against 3.9% for the S&P 500 and 3.2% for the Nasdaq 100. That said, GBTC is 35.3% below its high, bear-market territory, while the S&P 500 sits 1.3% below a record. At a glance ↓
- Fund or market?GBTC's 26.3% gain over the past 3 months is part of a broader bitcoin rally: the bitcoin ETF IBIT (iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF) rose 26.6%, with IBIT (up 26.6%) and FBTC (Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund, up 26.5%).
- Long termGBTC turned $10,000 into $735,000 over the past decade, against $42,100 in the S&P 500. On the flip side, over 5 years GBTC trailed the index: 23.1% against 81.7%. Growth of $10,000 ↓
- In a crashIn the 2022 bear market, GBTC fell 67.8%, against 24.5% for the S&P 500, and more than similar funds such as BITO (ProShares Bitcoin ETF, 61.9%). GBTC fell further than the S&P 500 in six of the last six sell-offs, including the 2022 bear market (67.8% against 24.5%). Crash tests ↓
- DiversificationAgainst the S&P 500, GBTC has a correlation of 0.50 over 5 years, less closely than 86% of ETFs with at least $100 million in assets. Next to an index fund it is some diversification, but not a hedge. GBTC now moves more with the S&P 500: a correlation of 0.50 over the past 5 years, up from 0.16 in the 5 years before.
- Better options
- Popular alternatives
- BLOK (Amplify Blockchain Technology ETF) matched GBTC's return over the past 5 years (4.9% a year against 4.2%) with 29% less volatility.
- Nearby categories and themes
- GLD (SPDR Gold Shares, gold) earned more than GBTC with less volatility over the past 5 years: 17.7% a year at 18.9% volatility, against 4.2% a year at 59.6%.
- Whole market
- 1,749 of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than GBTC with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them NVDA (NVIDIA), AAPL (Apple) and GOOG (Alphabet).
How much would $10,000 in GBTC have grown?
This chart tracks a hypothetical $10,000 investment in GBTC over the past 10 years, with dividends reinvested, alongside the same amount in the S&P 500, investments that ended ahead of GBTC over the same span and GBTC's popular alternatives, among those that traded for the entire period. A second view covers the past 5 years, the period the better options further down the page are judged on. It shows not only where each investment ended up but also how smooth or uneven the path was.
Note: The chart covers the past 10 years rather than GBTC's full 11 years, because most of its popular alternatives have not traded that long.
- $10,000 invested in GBTC at the end of September 2016 would have grown to $733,365 by September 2026, more than the $41,286 it would have become in SPY, an S&P 500 fund.
- Three of the five other investments on the chart ended ahead of GBTC, and NVDA finished highest, at $1,367,620.
Choose a period
From the end of September 2016 to the end of September 2026. The scale is logarithmic, so equal steps up the chart are equal percentage gains. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 3 of the 2,697 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of GBTC. The other 2 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- NVDA$1M+13,576% total · +63.5% a year
- AMD$885,314+8,753% total · +56.6% a year
- PAYS$748,914+7,389% total · +54.0% a year
- GBTC$733,365+7,234% total · +53.6% a year
- MSTR$91,451+815% total · +24.8% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$41,286+313% total · +15.2% a year
- MARA$2,520−74.8% total · −12.9% a year
From the end of September 2021 to the end of September 2026. The scale is logarithmic, so equal steps up the chart are equal percentage gains. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 895 of the 3,628 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of GBTC; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- ATI$113,890+1,039% total · +62.7% a year
- MPC$71,516+615% total · +48.2% a year
- CAH$49,682+397% total · +37.8% a year
- TSM$43,622+336% total · +34.3% a year
- MSTR$26,468+165% total · +21.5% a year
- GLD$23,190+132% total · +18.3% a year
- GBTC$19,082+90.8% total · +13.8% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$19,000+90.0% total · +13.7% a year
- BLOK$16,845+68.5% total · +11.0% a year
- MARA$3,588−64.1% total · −18.5% a year
GBTC at a glance
This section summarizes the key facts about the fund, its returns over periods from one to ten years and the risk it has carried, with dividends reinvested throughout. These figures serve as the baseline for every comparison that follows.
Note: GBTC began trading on May 11, 2015, so every figure here, including its worst decline, covers only the time since then. None of them reflect the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or two other sell-offs.
- GBTC is still 35.3% below its all-time high.
- GBTC's deepest decline since it began trading in 2015 was 89.9%, from December 2017 to December 2018. It took 25 months from the low to climb back to its old high.
- Over ten full calendar years, GBTC's best was 2017, when it returned 1,761%, and its worst was 2018, when it lost 82.1%. It lost money in three of those years.
The fund
- Issuer
- Grayscale
- Began trading
- May 2015
- Expense ratio
- 1.50%per year
- Assets
- $10B
- Category
- Crypto
Returns
- Past 1 year
- −26.7%total return
- Past 3 years
- +169%+39.2% a year
- Past 5 years
- +23.1%+4.2% a year
- Past 10 years
- +7,255%+53.7% a year
- Best calendar year
- +1,761%2017
- Worst calendar year
- −82.1%2018
- Losing years
- 3 of 10full calendar years
Risk
- Volatility
- 59.6%typical yearly swing, 5 years
- Sharpe ratio
- 0.37return per unit of risk, 5 years
- Worst decline ever
- −89.9%Dec 2017 to Dec 2018
- From its all-time high
- −35.3%below the peak
GBTC against the whole market
Where GBTC ranks among every stock and fund, and what across the market has done better.
How does GBTC rank among all ETFs?
This section ranks GBTC on return, volatility, risk-adjusted return and worst decline against every ETF worth at least $100 million with enough history. Where the comparisons with its popular alternatives show how GBTC stacks up against its peers, these rankings show where it stands in the market as a whole.
- GBTC's 10-year return ranks in the top 1% of the 958 ETFs with at least $100 million in assets with 10 years of history.
- GBTC's worst decline of the past 10 years ranks in the bottom 1% of the 951 ETFs with at least $100 million in assets, where the top fell the least.
Ranked against U.S.-listed ETFs with at least $100M in assets that have enough history for each measure, so the count changes from row to row; smaller ETFs and leveraged funds are left out. Lower volatility and smaller declines rank higher.
| Measure | GBTC | Rank | Standing |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | −26.7% | 2,451 of 2,485 | bottom 2% |
| 3-year return | +169% | 53 of 1,949 | top 3% |
| 5-year return | +23.1% | 1,079 of 1,560 | bottom 32% |
| 10-year return | +7,255% | 1 of 958 | top 1% |
| Volatility, 5 years | 59.6% | 1,549 of 1,560 | bottom 2% |
| Sharpe ratio, 5 years | 0.37 | 1,138 of 1,560 | bottom 28% |
| Worst decline, past 10 years | −89.9% | 947 of 951 | bottom 1% |
What has beaten GBTC on both return and risk?
Each dot is an investment, placed by how much it earned a year over the past 5 years (higher is better) and how much its price swung, its volatility (further left is calmer). GBTC sits where the dashed lines cross. Anything in the green box above and to the left earned more than GBTC with smaller swings, a better trade-off over this period on both counts. Past results are no promise, but a name in the box is worth a closer look.
- 1,081 stocks and 668 ETFs worth at least $500 million sit in the green region: each earned more than GBTC over the past 5 years with smaller price swings. That is 48% of the 3,633 screened.
- Among those with at least half GBTC's swings, FIX has the best return for its risk: 77.0% a year at 46.7% volatility, 22% less than GBTC's 59.6%, and a Sharpe ratio (return above cash per unit of volatility) of 1.46 against 0.37 for GBTC. BELFB earned the most, 78.0% a year, while still swinging less than GBTC (52.1% against 59.6%).
- None of GBTC's popular alternatives made it, but IAUM (gold) did: 18.1% a year at 18.8% volatility, 68% less than GBTC's 59.6%.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested, and volatility the annualized swing in daily prices, both over 5 years. Labeled dots are the strongest picks from the table below and the names called out above, colored by how close they sit to GBTC; faint dots are 93 more of the 1,749 in the green region (the strongest, one per fund family). 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million were screened. Hover over a dot for its figures.
- Popular alternatives
- Same and neighboring categories, and shared themes
- The whole market
- Others in the green region
Is there a better investment than GBTC?
Investments that beat GBTC over the past 5 years on return, volatility, drawdowns, consistency, crash losses or fees, from its popular alternatives out to the whole market.
- Among GBTC's popular alternatives, BLOK matched GBTC's return over the past 5 years (4.9% a year against 4.2%) with 29% less volatility.
- Looking beyond its popular alternatives, GLD (gold) earned more than GBTC with less volatility over the past 5 years: 17.7% a year at 18.9% volatility, against 4.2% a year at 59.6%.
- Across the whole market, 1,749 of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than GBTC with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them NVDA, AAPL and GOOG.
How this works
The table below lists investments that beat GBTC over the past 5 years on at least one of these measures: a higher annual return with lower volatility, a higher annual return at similar volatility, a similar return with lower volatility, a higher Sharpe ratio with a smaller worst decline, a higher total return in most periods from 3 months to 10 years, or smaller losses in recent market crashes, and, for funds, the same exposure at a lower expense ratio. It checks GBTC's popular alternatives first, then the rest of its own and neighboring categories, then every stock and fund worth at least $500 million, and shows the strongest few in each group. The full list of those with a higher return and lower volatility than GBTC follows the table.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested. Annual return, volatility and the Sharpe ratio cover 5 years; the worst decline covers the past 10 years. Green marks a better figure than GBTC's. "On the frontier" means no other option shown or tested earned more with less volatility. Funds that hold the same thing are shown once. Beyond the popular alternatives, nothing with more than 1.5× GBTC's volatility counts as better.
These figures cover the past 5 years. Green marks a better figure than GBTC's.
| Investment | Why it is better | Past 5 years | Downside | Long run | Fit | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Annual return?higher is better | Volatility?lower is calmer | Sharpe?return per unit of risk | Worst decline?past 10 years | 10Y returntotal | Corr. with GBTC?lower diversifies more | Expenseper year | |||
| +4.2% | 59.6% | 0.37 | −89.9% | +7,255% | 1.00 | 1.50% | |||
| +12.7% | 17.1% | 0.79 | −33.7% | +321% | 0.50 | 0.09% | |||
| Popular alternativesbest 1 shownThe investments people most often weigh against GBTC. 1 of 5 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
BLOKAmplify Blockchain Technology ETF · Crypto | Similar return, lower volatility | +4.9% | 42.5% | 0.33 | −73.3% | — | 0.75 | 0.70% | |
| Same and neighboring categories, and shared themesbest 1 shownEverything else in Bitcoin and the categories next to it (Ethereum, Cryptocurrency Exchanges, Bitcoin Treasury, Gold), plus GBTC's specific themes. 5 of 6 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +17.7% | 18.9% | 0.96 | −26.4% | +213% | 0.16 | 0.40% | ||
| The whole marketbest 8 shownEvery other stock and fund worth at least $500 million. 2,085 of 3,622 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| On the frontierHigher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +51.2% | 33.4% | 1.41 | −79.7% | +1,387% | 0.25 | — | ||
| On the frontierHigher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +42.1% | 24.7% | 1.55 | −46.1% | +349% | 0.03 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +31.5% | 38.5% | 0.91 | −56.6% | +1,505% | 0.16 | — | ||
ATIATI Inc. · Metals & Mining | On the frontierHigher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +61.8% | 42.9% | 1.34 | −82.4% | +929% | 0.15 | — | |
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +55.2% | 54.4% | 1.08 | −59.6% | +3,701% | 0.11 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +33.4% | 36.9% | 0.97 | −45.3% | +1,665% | 0.31 | 0.35% | ||
| Higher return, similar volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +68.1% | 57.1% | 1.20 | −57.6% | +5,243% | 0.10 | — | ||
| On the frontierSimilar return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +3.8% | 0.3% | 13.25 | −0.3% | — | 0.24 | 0.09% | ||
What these numbers mean for GBTC
- Annual return
- GBTC returned 4.2% a year over the past 5 years with dividends reinvested, against 12.7% a year for the S&P 500. At that pace, $10,000 became about $12,300. Annual return is the steady yearly rate that would produce the same total result, so investments held over the same span compare fairly. Guide: What is performance and return? →
- Volatility
- GBTC's volatility over the past 5 years was 59.6%, 3.5 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, GBTC's return lands within 59.6% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump. Guide: Understanding and measuring risk (volatility) →
- Sharpe ratio
- GBTC's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.37, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so GBTC earned less for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings. Guide: Balancing reward with risk (Sharpe ratio) →
- Worst decline
- GBTC's worst fall from a peak to a low over the past 10 years was 89.9%, against 33.7% for the S&P 500. Losses and gains are not symmetric: climbing back from a 89.9% fall takes a 891% gain. Guide: Market crash risk and tail risk →
- Correlation
- Over the past 5 years, GBTC's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.50 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They often move together: some diversification next to an index fund, but not a cushion. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against GBTC instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a GBTC holding. Guide: Correlation and diversification →
Show all 1,749 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that earned more than GBTC with less volatility
Out of 3,633 tested over 5 years. The strongest 100 are listed, best first, with funds that hold the same thing listed once.
| # | Investment | Found in | Annual return | Volatility | Sharpe | Worst decline | 10Y return | Corr. with GBTC | Expense |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Whole market | +51.2% | 33.4% | 1.41 | −79.7% | +1,387% | 0.25 | — | |
| 2 | Whole market | +42.1% | 24.7% | 1.55 | −46.1% | +349% | 0.03 | — | |
| 3 | Whole market | +31.5% | 38.5% | 0.91 | −56.6% | +1,505% | 0.16 | — | |
| 4 | ATIATI Inc. · Metals & Mining | Whole market | +61.8% | 42.9% | 1.34 | −82.4% | +929% | 0.15 | — |
| 5 | Whole market | +55.2% | 54.4% | 1.08 | −59.6% | +3,701% | 0.11 | — | |
| 6 | Whole market | +17.4% | 43.4% | 0.59 | −56.9% | +1,628% | 0.25 | — | |
| 7 | Whole market | +33.2% | 29.4% | 1.13 | −54.9% | +483% | 0.08 | — | |
| 8 | Whole market | +49.0% | 49.0% | 1.06 | −52.2% | +3,439% | 0.38 | — | |
| 9 | INSWInternational Seaways, Inc. · Oil & Gas | Whole market | +56.5% | 40.5% | 1.31 | −57.4% | — | -0.03 | — |
| 10 | Whole market | +31.9% | 43.4% | 0.86 | −48.0% | +1,274% | 0.18 | — | |
| 11 | Whole market | +57.4% | 48.7% | 1.18 | −57.0% | +2,698% | 0.21 | — | |
| 12 | Whole market | +26.0% | 23.8% | 1.09 | −63.3% | +379% | 0.11 | — | |
| 13 | Whole market | +38.7% | 33.3% | 1.16 | −69.6% | +542% | 0.17 | — | |
| 14 | Whole market | +44.2% | 36.9% | 1.18 | −71.9% | +1,061% | 0.15 | — | |
| 15 | Whole market | +26.3% | 52.7% | 0.71 | −67.7% | — | 0.30 | — | |
| 16 | Whole market | +33.6% | 30.6% | 1.10 | −45.7% | +345% | 0.07 | — | |
| 17 | Whole market | +32.0% | 40.7% | 0.89 | −55.3% | +1,017% | 0.16 | — | |
| 18 | Whole market | +33.2% | 32.9% | 1.04 | −64.2% | +430% | 0.10 | — | |
| 19 | Whole market | +33.7% | 29.4% | 1.14 | −47.6% | +474% | 0.00 | — | |
| 20 | Whole market | +48.8% | 43.0% | 1.15 | −52.5% | +967% | 0.07 | — | |
| 21 | Whole market | +29.5% | 38.4% | 0.87 | −54.2% | +352% | 0.16 | — | |
| 22 | Whole market | +24.7% | 31.1% | 0.87 | −74.4% | +339% | 0.00 | — | |
| 23 | Whole market | +22.6% | 24.0% | 0.97 | −57.5% | +373% | 0.21 | — | |
| 24 | Whole market | +20.7% | 44.8% | 0.65 | −38.3% | +2,626% | 0.26 | — | |
| 25 | Whole market | +18.6% | 39.1% | 0.63 | −62.4% | +304% | 0.07 | — | |
| 26 | Whole market | +33.4% | 36.9% | 0.97 | −45.3% | +1,665% | 0.31 | 0.35% | |
| 27 | Whole market | +32.9% | 42.2% | 0.89 | −56.9% | +483% | 0.14 | — | |
| 28 | BAPCredicorp Ltd. · Banks | Whole market | +30.8% | 30.3% | 1.04 | −59.2% | +298% | 0.24 | — |
| 29 | Whole market | +37.3% | 55.0% | 0.85 | −69.4% | +899% | 0.33 | — | |
| 30 | Whole market | +25.3% | 34.4% | 0.83 | −64.1% | +390% | 0.22 | — | |
| 31 | Whole market | +14.8% | 31.6% | 0.59 | −54.6% | +670% | 0.17 | — | |
| 32 | Whole market | +19.9% | 43.2% | 0.63 | −54.3% | +1,610% | 0.04 | — | |
| 33 | Whole market | +20.9% | 35.3% | 0.71 | −58.1% | +691% | 0.28 | — | |
| 34 | CIBGrupo Cibest S.A. · Banks | Whole market | +32.9% | 32.9% | 1.03 | −70.4% | +345% | 0.18 | — |
| 35 | Whole market | +11.7% | 32.9% | 0.50 | −53.6% | +374% | 0.42 | — | |
| 36 | Whole market | +14.4% | 29.9% | 0.60 | −59.6% | +212% | 0.30 | — | |
| 37 | WSMWilliams-Sonoma, Inc. · Specialty Retail | Whole market | +24.5% | 44.4% | 0.71 | −59.7% | +1,268% | 0.47 | — |
| 38 | THCTenet Healthcare Corporation · Health Care Facilities | Whole market | +32.9% | 45.1% | 0.86 | −71.7% | +1,058% | 0.22 | — |
| 39 | USFDUS Foods Holding Corp. · Food Distribution | Whole market | +22.7% | 29.8% | 0.84 | −77.3% | +347% | 0.16 | — |
| 40 | COKECoca-Cola Consolidated, Inc. · Food & Beverages | Whole market | +41.2% | 38.0% | 1.10 | −51.7% | +1,569% | -0.18 | — |
| 41 | EXPEExpedia Group, Inc. · Travel Services | Whole market | +13.2% | 46.5% | 0.50 | −70.5% | +154% | 0.22 | — |
| 42 | FFIVF5, Inc. · Cybersecurity | Whole market | +17.1% | 30.8% | 0.67 | −54.6% | +287% | 0.23 | — |
| 43 | MOG-AMoog Inc. · Aerospace & Defense | Whole market | +36.6% | 32.0% | 1.14 | −63.7% | +595% | 0.12 | — |
| 44 | SNXTD Synnex Corp · Technology Distribution | Whole market | +20.3% | 30.4% | 0.76 | −55.8% | +430% | 0.23 | — |
| 45 | FROFrontline Plc · Oil & Gas | Whole market | +52.6% | 49.7% | 1.10 | −52.0% | +1,194% | 0.07 | — |
| 46 | EXELExelixis, Inc. · Biotechnology | Whole market | +24.4% | 35.8% | 0.79 | −57.2% | +448% | 0.09 | — |
| 47 | HALOHalozyme Therapeutics, Inc. · Biotechnology | Whole market | +26.6% | 40.4% | 0.79 | −49.1% | +1,196% | -0.10 | — |
| 48 | EWTiShares MSCI Taiwan ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +20.4% | 24.2% | 0.89 | −38.9% | +468% | 0.15 | 0.59% |
| 49 | JXNJackson Financial Inc. · Life Insurance | Whole market | +41.7% | 43.3% | 1.03 | −48.4% | — | 0.26 | — |
| 50 | LAURLaureate Education, Inc. · Education Services | Whole market | +37.5% | 32.8% | 1.14 | −64.5% | — | 0.05 | — |
| 51 | KNSAKiniksa Pharmaceuticals International, plc · Biotechnology | Whole market | +50.2% | 53.7% | 1.02 | −83.1% | — | -0.26 | — |
| 52 | BPOPPopular, Inc. · Regional Banks | Whole market | +17.7% | 29.7% | 0.70 | −59.0% | +448% | 0.05 | — |
| 53 | AMGAffiliated Managers Group, Inc. · Asset Management | Whole market | +18.8% | 31.9% | 0.70 | −78.5% | +185% | 0.17 | — |
| 54 | VCTRVictory Capital Holdings, Inc. · Asset Management | Whole market | +28.1% | 35.0% | 0.89 | −45.2% | — | 0.30 | — |
| 55 | BWLPBW LPG Limited · Marine Shipping | Whole market | +60.3% | 50.9% | 1.19 | −68.8% | +2,672% | 0.04 | — |
| 56 | LTHLife Time Group Holdings, Inc. · Leisure Facilities | Whole market | +19.0% | 46.6% | 0.61 | −58.4% | — | — | — |
| 57 | MATXMatson, Inc. · Freight & Logistics | Whole market | +24.9% | 39.4% | 0.76 | −53.6% | +594% | 0.22 | — |
| 58 | NHCNational HealthCare Corporation · Medical - Care Facilities | Whole market | +32.0% | 28.5% | 1.12 | −35.3% | +394% | 0.06 | — |
| 59 | LGNDLigand Pharmaceuticals Incorporated · Biotechnology | Whole market | +30.2% | 44.2% | 0.82 | −76.9% | +414% | 0.06 | — |
| 60 | SIMOSilicon Motion Technology Corporation · Semiconductors | Whole market | +28.0% | 55.1% | 0.71 | −56.5% | +494% | 0.03 | — |
| 61 | FLTWFranklin FTSE Taiwan ETF · Technology | Whole market | +21.8% | 24.3% | 0.94 | −38.0% | — | 0.13 | 0.19% |
| 62 | ENVAEnova International, Inc. · Consumer Finance | Whole market | +37.8% | 41.9% | 0.98 | −77.6% | +1,819% | 0.09 | — |
| 63 | QTUMDefiance Quantum ETF · Technology | Whole market | +22.8% | 28.1% | 0.87 | −38.5% | — | 0.35 | 0.40% |
| 64 | IFSIntercorp Financial Services Inc. · Regional Banks | Whole market | +20.8% | 31.1% | 0.77 | −56.9% | — | 0.23 | — |
| 65 | CAKEThe Cheesecake Factory Incorporated · Restaurants | Whole market | +25.8% | 39.9% | 0.78 | −75.6% | +187% | 0.32 | — |
| 66 | DHTDHT Holdings, Inc. · Marine Shipping | Whole market | +38.7% | 39.0% | 1.04 | −39.7% | +1,050% | 0.00 | — |
| 67 | DKDelek US Holdings, Inc. · Oil & Gas | Whole market | +34.0% | 52.7% | 0.82 | −84.3% | +524% | 0.06 | — |
| 68 | WTWisdomTree, Inc. · Asset Management | Whole market | +31.4% | 32.8% | 1.00 | −84.0% | +174% | 0.35 | — |
| 69 | VIRTVirtu Financial, Inc. · Capital Markets | Whole market | +20.8% | 33.8% | 0.73 | −56.2% | +545% | 0.20 | — |
| 70 | MCYMercury General Corporation · Property & Casualty Insurance | Whole market | +17.0% | 34.3% | 0.63 | −55.3% | +198% | 0.15 | — |
| 71 | AAMIAcadian Asset Management · Asset Management | Whole market | +29.0% | 35.6% | 0.90 | −78.1% | +652% | 0.33 | — |
| 72 | CGAUCenterra Gold Inc. · Gold Mining | Whole market | +26.3% | 47.6% | 0.73 | −72.2% | +421% | 0.19 | — |
| 73 | DXPEDXP Enterprises, Inc. · Industrial - Distribution | Whole market | +39.0% | 46.1% | 0.95 | −77.3% | +610% | 0.26 | — |
| 74 | GEOThe GEO Group, Inc. · Security & Protection Services | Whole market | +27.7% | 51.5% | 0.73 | −77.8% | +174% | 0.22 | — |
| 75 | SOXQInvesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF · Technology | Whole market | +28.3% | 38.9% | 0.84 | −46.0% | — | 0.26 | 0.19% |
| 76 | DCODucommun Incorporated · Aerospace & Defense | Whole market | +27.5% | 34.5% | 0.88 | −70.8% | +706% | 0.25 | — |
| 77 | DGIIDigi International Inc. · Communication Equipment | Whole market | +28.0% | 42.4% | 0.79 | −65.7% | +587% | -0.03 | — |
| 78 | Whole market | +17.3% | 18.2% | 0.97 | −40.0% | +352% | 0.11 | — | |
| 79 | Whole market | +51.8% | 37.5% | 1.31 | −71.7% | +768% | 0.08 | — | |
| 80 | Whole market | +58.0% | 51.9% | 1.14 | −66.3% | +13,019% | 0.48 | — | |
| 81 | TENTsakos Energy Navigation Limited · Oil & Gas Midstream | Whole market | +46.9% | 46.3% | 1.07 | −68.7% | +211% | -0.05 | — |
| 82 | IMAXIMAX Corporation · Entertainment | Whole market | +20.2% | 40.1% | 0.66 | −79.4% | +65.3% | 0.05 | — |
| 83 | TKTeekay Corporation · Oil & Gas Midstream | Whole market | +47.1% | 41.7% | 1.13 | −83.8% | +244% | 0.10 | — |
| 84 | DRDDRDGOLD Limited · Gold | Whole market | +27.0% | 52.3% | 0.72 | −74.0% | +589% | 0.12 | — |
| 85 | UVEUniversal Insurance Holdings, Inc. · Insurance - Property & Casualty | Whole market | +34.3% | 42.8% | 0.91 | −79.6% | +216% | 0.10 | — |
| 86 | TILEInterface, Inc. · Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances | Whole market | +19.0% | 42.8% | 0.62 | −78.0% | +136% | 0.36 | — |
| 87 | Whole market | +47.3% | 32.5% | 1.36 | −68.9% | +1,028% | 0.22 | — | |
| 88 | AMALAmalgamated Financial Corp. · Banks - Regional | Whole market | +24.7% | 33.4% | 0.83 | −62.9% | — | 0.02 | — |
| 89 | HCIHCI Group, Inc. · Insurance - Property & Casualty | Whole market | +11.7% | 42.0% | 0.47 | −78.8% | +829% | 0.39 | — |
| 90 | UFCSUnited Fire Group, Inc. · Insurance - Property & Casualty | Whole market | +23.7% | 39.1% | 0.74 | −64.5% | +86.7% | 0.04 | — |
| 91 | KAROKarooooo Ltd. · Software - Application | Whole market | +15.9% | 53.8% | 0.54 | −52.1% | — | 0.27 | — |
| 92 | IDTIDT Corporation · Telecommunications Services | Whole market | +12.3% | 38.5% | 0.49 | −77.1% | +429% | 0.40 | — |
| 93 | ALNTAllient Inc. · Electrical Equipment & Parts | Whole market | +22.9% | 49.7% | 0.66 | −68.7% | +374% | 0.23 | — |
| 94 | NWPXNWPX Infrastructure, Inc. · Construction Materials | Whole market | +32.5% | 36.2% | 0.96 | −46.5% | +682% | -0.04 | — |
| 95 | Whole market | +18.5% | 28.0% | 0.75 | −38.5% | +1,168% | 0.31 | — | |
| 96 | SENEASeneca Foods Corporation · Packaged Foods | Whole market | +25.2% | 36.4% | 0.81 | −51.3% | +455% | -0.12 | — |
| 97 | Whole market | +77.0% | 46.7% | 1.46 | −49.7% | +5,305% | 0.41 | — | |
| 98 | CPACCementos Pacasmayo S.A.A. · Construction Materials | Whole market | +24.4% | 38.8% | 0.74 | −55.9% | +166% | 0.18 | — |
| 99 | KRTKarat Packaging Inc. · Packaging & Containers | Whole market | +25.4% | 44.1% | 0.74 | −48.4% | — | 0.34 | — |
| 100 | Whole market | +19.0% | 32.0% | 0.71 | −44.6% | +752% | 0.26 | — |
GBTC against its popular alternatives
The investments people most often weigh against GBTC, compared period by period and year by year.
How do GBTC's risk and return compare with its alternatives?
This map plots each investment's annual return over the past 5 years against its volatility, the size of its typical price swings. Investments toward the upper left earned more for a smoother ride, and those toward the lower right earned less for a rougher one. The dashed lines cross at GBTC, which divides the map into what did better or worse on each measure.
- Only BLOK was both more rewarding and calmer than GBTC over the past 5 years, earning a higher annual return with lower volatility.
- Over the past 5 years, GBTC returned 4.2% a year, less than the S&P 500's 12.7%, with higher volatility (59.6% against 17.1%).
Green points earned more than GBTC with less volatility; red points earned less with more. Hover over a point for its figures. Total returns with dividends reinvested, annualized.
All figures
| Investment | Annual return | Volatility |
|---|---|---|
| MSTR Strategy Inc | +13.5% | 91.1% |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | +12.7% | 17.1% |
| BLOK Amplify Blockchain Technology ETF | +4.9% | 42.5% |
| GBTC This pageGrayscale Bitcoin Trust ETF | +4.2% | 59.6% |
| BITO ProShares Bitcoin ETF | −1.0% | 54.0% |
| COIN Coinbase Global, Inc. | −11.5% | 86.9% |
| MARA Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. | −32.4% | 106% |
Has GBTC consistently beaten its popular alternatives?
This section compares GBTC with the investments people most often weigh against it, checking each one over eight periods from one month to ten years. Counting how often an alternative earned more than GBTC helps separate lasting outperformance from a single strong stretch.
- None of the 15 popular alternatives outperformed GBTC in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes. The closest was BLOK.
- MSTR earned more for the risk it took than GBTC (a higher Sharpe ratio) and fell less in its worst decline of the past 10 years.
A green cell means the alternative earned more than GBTC over that period. "Qualified" marks those that did so in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods.
| Investment | Periods outperformed | Short term | Long term | Risk · 5 years | Fund | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1M | 3M | 6M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | 10Y | Volatilitylower is calmer | Sharpehigher is better | Worst declinepast 10 years | Expense | Assets | Overlapsame sectors | ||
| GBTC Grayscale Bitcoin Trust ETF (this page) | — | −4.8% | +26.3% | +7.3% | −9.2% | −26.7% | +169% | +23.1% | +7,255% | 59.6% | 0.37 | −89.9% | 1.50% | $10B | — |
| BLOK CryptoAmplify Blockchain Technology ETF | 2/5 short2/3 long | −17.5% | −9.0% | −10.0% | −6.9% | −22.4% | +205% | +27.0% | — | 42.5% | 0.33 | −73.3% | 0.70% | $939M | — |
| MSTR Software - ApplicationStrategy Inc | 1/5 short2/3 long | −15.3% | +45.9% | −16.4% | −9.2% | −51.9% | +310% | +88.2% | +748% | 91.1% | 0.59 | −89.3% | — | $57B | — |
| ARKB CryptoARK 21Shares Bitcoin ETF | 3/5 short0/3 long | −4.6% | +26.6% | +8.0% | −8.2% | −25.8% | — | — | — | — | — | −53.3% | 0.21% | $2.9B | — |
| BITB CryptoBitwise Bitcoin ETF Trust | 3/5 short0/3 long | −4.7% | +26.6% | +7.9% | −8.3% | −25.8% | — | — | — | — | — | −53.3% | 0.20% | $3.0B | — |
| BRRR CryptoCoinShares Bitcoin ETF | 3/5 short0/3 long | −4.8% | +26.6% | +7.9% | −8.4% | −25.8% | — | — | — | — | — | −53.3% | 0.25% | $462M | — |
| BTC CryptoGrayscale Bitcoin Mini Trust ETF | 3/5 short0/3 long | −4.6% | +26.7% | +8.0% | −8.2% | −25.7% | — | — | — | — | — | −53.3% | 0.15% | $5.1B | — |
| BTCO CryptoInvesco Galaxy Bitcoin ETF | 3/5 short0/3 long | −4.7% | +26.6% | +7.9% | −8.3% | −25.8% | — | — | — | — | — | −53.3% | 0.25% | $413M | — |
| EZBC CryptoFranklin Bitcoin ETF | 3/5 short0/3 long | −4.7% | +26.6% | +7.9% | −8.2% | −25.8% | — | — | — | — | — | −53.3% | 0.19% | $460M | — |
| FBTC CryptoFidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund | 3/5 short0/3 long | −4.8% | +26.5% | +7.9% | −8.3% | −25.8% | — | — | — | — | — | −53.3% | 0.25% | $15B | — |
| HODL CryptoVanEck Bitcoin ETF | 3/5 short0/3 long | −4.6% | +26.7% | +8.2% | −8.0% | −25.6% | — | — | — | — | — | −93.7% | 0.20% | $1.2B | — |
| IBIT CryptoiShares Bitcoin Trust ETF | 3/5 short0/3 long | −4.7% | +26.6% | +8.0% | −8.3% | −25.8% | — | — | — | — | — | −53.3% | 0.25% | $65B | — |
| ETHA CryptoiShares Ethereum Trust ETF | 1/5 short0/3 long | −12.0% | +28.1% | +4.2% | −22.2% | −39.1% | — | — | — | — | — | −67.9% | 0.25% | $8.2B | — |
| MARA Financial - Capital MarketsMarathon Digital Holdings, Inc. | 0/5 short0/3 long | −43.7% | −35.9% | −35.7% | −24.5% | −63.9% | −3.6% | −85.9% | −79.2% | 106% | 0.15 | −99.0% | — | $2.9B | — |
| BITO CryptoProShares Bitcoin ETF | 0/5 short0/3 long | −5.1% | +25.4% | +6.2% | −10.7% | −28.3% | +131% | −4.9% | — | 54.0% | 0.25 | −77.9% | 0.95% | $1.6B | — |
| COIN Financial - Data & Stock ExchangesCoinbase Global, Inc. | 0/5 short0/3 long | −15.0% | +6.5% | −19.3% | −27.8% | −50.3% | +129% | −45.7% | — | 86.9% | 0.29 | −90.9% | — | $45B | — |
How did GBTC do year by year?
This table shows each investment's total return in every full calendar year since 2016, along with where GBTC ranked among its popular alternatives each year. Annual results reveal how consistently each one kept pace with GBTC and how far its good and bad years diverged, detail that multiyear averages tend to smooth over.
Note: GBTC began trading on May 11, 2015, so the table starts with 2016, its first full calendar year, and cannot show how it fared during the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or two other sell-offs.
- None of the three popular alternatives came out ahead of GBTC in most of the years they have in common.
- GBTC finished ahead of the S&P 500 in six of its ten full calendar years.
- Ranked against its popular alternatives each year, GBTC finished in the top quarter in one of four years and in the bottom quarter in no. In 2025, it ranked 3 of 8.
Newest year first. Green marks a year in which the fund came out ahead of GBTC; gray means the two finished within a fraction of a point. The rank row places GBTC among the alternatives that traded the full year; dark green is the top quarter and red the bottom quarter.
| Investment | Years ahead of GBTC | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GBTC This pageGrayscale Bitcoin Trust ETF | — | −7.6% | +114% | +318% | −75.8% | +7.0% | +291% | +106% | −82.1% | +1,761% | +93.0% |
| Rank among alternatives | Top quarter in 1 of 4 | 3 of 8 | 2 of 6 | 4 of 6 | 4 of 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 4 of 10 | +17.7% | +24.9% | +26.2% | −18.2% | +28.7% | +18.3% | +31.2% | −4.6% | +21.7% | +12.0% |
| BLOK Amplify Blockchain Technology ETF | 3 of 7 | +32.6% | +53.1% | +99.6% | −62.4% | +30.8% | +90.1% | +29.6% | — | — | — |
| MSTR Strategy Inc | 4 of 10 | −47.5% | +359% | +346% | −74.0% | +40.2% | +172% | +11.6% | −2.7% | −33.5% | +10.1% |
| ARKB ARK 21Shares Bitcoin ETF | 1 of 1 | −6.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ETHA iShares Ethereum Trust ETF | 0 of 1 | −11.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| MARA Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. | 3 of 10 | −46.5% | −28.6% | +587% | −89.6% | +215% | +1,086% | −38.9% | −91.2% | −40.4% | +7.5% |
| BITO ProShares Bitcoin ETF | 1 of 4 | −11.2% | +105% | +137% | −63.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| COIN Coinbase Global, Inc. | 1 of 4 | −8.9% | +42.8% | +391% | −86.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Risk and diversification
How GBTC has fallen, how it held up in crashes beside the S&P 500 and its popular alternatives, and what moves independently of it.
What were GBTC's worst declines?
A drawdown is the decline from a peak to the lowest point before a new high. This section presents GBTC's five deepest drawdowns since it began trading in 2015, alongside the S&P 500's return over the same dates, and how long each took to recover. Together, these figures show how much an investor could have lost and how long it took to get back to even.
Note: GBTC began trading on May 11, 2015, so this list cannot include the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or two other sell-offs. The crash tests on this page show how older funds and the S&P 500 fared through those years.
- In all five of GBTC's worst declines, the S&P 500 held up better over the same dates.
- Not every decline was the market's doing: GBTC fell 89.9% from December 2017 to December 2018, while the S&P 500 slipped only 1.6%.
- The slowest recovery came after GBTC fell 89.9% from December 2017 to December 2018; it did not regain that peak until January 2021, two years later.
Green means GBTC fell less than the S&P 500 over the same dates. Based on daily closing prices with dividends reinvested.
| During | GBTC fell | S&P 500, same dates | Peak | Low | Time to the low | Back at the peak | Time to recover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Late-2018 sell-off | −89.9% | −1.6% | Dec 2017 | Dec 2018 | 12 months | Jan 2021 | 2.1 years |
| 2022 bear market | −86.2% | −0.5% | Feb 2021 | Dec 2022 | 22 months | Mar 2024 | 15 months |
| 2015 China and oil sell-off | −53.8% | −7.2% | May 2015 | Aug 2015 | 3 months | Nov 2015 | 3 months |
| No named crash | −53.8% | +12.1% | Oct 2025 | Jun 2026 | 8 months | Not yet | — |
| No named crash | −48.5% | +1.1% | Aug 2017 | Sep 2017 | 1 month | Nov 2017 | 2 months |
How did GBTC do in stock market crashes?
This section measures how far GBTC, the S&P 500 and each alternative fell from peak to trough during every major market crash since 2000. A smaller decline means an investment held up better, and comparing results across crashes shows whether that resilience was consistent or a one-off.
Note: GBTC began trading on May 11, 2015, so its row reads "Not yet trading" for the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or two other sell-offs. The older alternatives and the S&P 500 show how those crashes played out.
- GBTC fell further than the S&P 500 in all six crashes it has traded through. The clearest case was the 2022 bear market, when GBTC fell 67.8% and the S&P 500 fell 24.5%.
- Among its popular alternatives, BLOK held up best, falling less than GBTC in all five crashes they both traded through.
Newest crash first. Each figure is the fund's deepest fall within the crash window; green means a smaller fall than GBTC.
| Investment | Held up better | 2023 regional bank crisisMar 2023 | 2022 bear marketJan 2022 | Covid crashFeb 2020 | Late-2018 sell-offSep 2018 | February 2018 volatility shockFeb 2018 | 2015 China and oil sell-offAug 2015 | 2011 euro debt crisisJul 2011 | 2010 flash crashMay 2010 | 2008 financial crisisOct 2007 | Dot-com bustMar 2000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GBTC This pageGrayscale Bitcoin Trust ETF | — | −15.2% | −67.8% | −57.8% | −56.6% | −16.3% | −36.9% | Not yet trading | Not yet trading | Not yet trading | Not yet trading |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 6 of 6 | −3.4% | −24.5% | −33.7% | −19.3% | −6.5% | −12.8% | −17.9% | −1.5% | −55.2% | −47.5% |
| BLOK Amplify Blockchain Technology ETF | 5 of 5 | −7.3% | −55.2% | −32.7% | −29.1% | −7.7% | — | — | — | — | — |
| MSTR Strategy Inc | 4 of 6 | −17.5% | −72.4% | −38.5% | −21.3% | −3.8% | −35.7% | −39.3% | −1.6% | −70.9% | −99.7% |
| MARA Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. | 3 of 6 | −13.8% | −84.4% | −62.6% | −55.2% | −14.1% | −54.3% | — | — | — | — |
| BITO ProShares Bitcoin ETF | 2 of 2 | −9.8% | −61.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| COIN Coinbase Global, Inc. | 0 of 2 | −15.2% | −81.2% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
What diversifies GBTC?
Correlation measures how closely two investments move together, on a scale from 1 (in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to -1 (in opposite directions). This section lists large ETFs and stocks whose returns have had a low correlation with GBTC's. Because such investments tend not to fall at the same time, pairing GBTC with them can reduce a portfolio's overall swings.
- Moving a fifth of the money in GBTC into LVHI would have cut the portfolio's volatility by 20% over the past 5 years and raised its annual return (+13.8% for GBTC alone, +18.3% for the mix).
- FIX made money in three of the three calendar years in which GBTC lost money.
- Among large ETFs, LVHI, DXJ and EMLP have moved largely independently of GBTC over the past 5 years, with correlations of 0.28 or lower, and each still earned a positive 5-year return.
Only ETFs with at least $1.0B in assets and stocks worth at least $10B, with a correlation below 0.5 over the past 5 years and a positive return, are included, ranked by Sharpe ratio; funds that hold the same thing are shown once. The year columns are the years in which GBTC lost money. The last two columns show a portfolio that is 80% GBTC and 20% the other investment, rebalanced monthly.
ETFs
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2025 | 2022 | 2018 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GBTC Grayscale Bitcoin Trust ETF (this page) | 1.00 | +23.1% | 0.37 | −7.6% | −75.8% | −82.1% | 67.9% | +13.8% |
| LVHI InternationalFranklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 0.11 | +119% | 1.48 | +27.1% | +3.8% | −5.2% | 54.5% | +18.3% |
| DXJ InternationalWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund | 0.17 | +225% | 1.34 | +32.8% | +6.0% | −19.8% | 54.8% | +20.3% |
| EMLP Broad MarketFirst Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund | 0.28 | +101% | 1.04 | +9.7% | +10.4% | −8.7% | 55.2% | +17.8% |
| HDV Dividend & IncomeiShares Core High Dividend ETF | 0.12 | +83.3% | 1.00 | +11.9% | +7.1% | −3.0% | 54.7% | +17.3% |
| SMH TechnologyVanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.31 | +323% | 0.97 | +49.2% | −33.5% | −9.1% | 56.8% | +22.0% |
| DBEF InternationalXtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF | 0.29 | +85.0% | 0.96 | +23.1% | −5.1% | −9.5% | 55.0% | +17.4% |
| GLD CommoditiesSPDR Gold Shares | 0.16 | +126% | 0.96 | +63.7% | −0.8% | −1.9% | 54.9% | +18.6% |
| FFLC Broad MarketFidelity Fundamental Large Cap Core ETF | 0.44 | +107% | 0.95 | +17.7% | 0.0% | — | 55.8% | +17.8% |
Stocks
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2025 | 2022 | 2018 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GBTC Grayscale Bitcoin Trust ETF (this page) | 1.00 | +23.1% | 0.37 | −7.6% | −75.8% | −82.1% | 67.9% | +13.8% |
| CAH Medical - DistributionCardinal Health, Inc. | 0.03 | +479% | 1.55 | +76.3% | +54.1% | −24.5% | 54.7% | +22.9% |
| CLS Hardware, Equipment & PartsCelestica Inc. | 0.31 | +3,143% | 1.47 | +220% | +1.3% | −16.3% | 59.0% | +34.1% |
| FIX Engineering & ConstructionComfort Systems USA, Inc. | 0.41 | +1,636% | 1.46 | +121% | +17.0% | +0.8% | 58.6% | +30.0% |
| MCK Medical - DistributionMcKesson Corporation | 0.12 | +413% | 1.44 | +44.5% | +51.8% | −28.4% | 55.1% | +22.1% |
| MPC Oil & Gas Refining & MarketingMarathon Petroleum Corporation | 0.25 | +690% | 1.41 | +19.2% | +86.6% | −8.2% | 56.3% | +24.1% |
Common questions
What was GBTC's worst drawdown?
GBTC's deepest decline since it began trading in 2015 was 89.9%, from December 2017 to December 2018. It took 25 months from the low to climb back to its old high. Because GBTC launched in May 2015, that record does not include the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or two other sell-offs.
What were GBTC's best and worst years?
Over ten full calendar years, GBTC's best year was 2017, when it returned 1,761%. Its worst was 2018, with a return of -82.1%.
Is there a better investment than GBTC?
Among GBTC's popular alternatives, BLOK matched GBTC's return over the past 5 years (4.9% a year against 4.2%) with 29% less volatility. Looking beyond its popular alternatives, GLD (gold) earned more than GBTC with less volatility over the past 5 years: 17.7% a year at 18.9% volatility, against 4.2% a year at 59.6%.
Is GBTC more volatile than the S&P 500?
Yes. GBTC's volatility over the past 5 years was 59.6%, 3.5 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, GBTC's return lands within 59.6% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump.
What is GBTC's Sharpe ratio?
GBTC's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.37, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so GBTC earned less for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings.
How correlated is GBTC with the S&P 500?
Over the past 5 years, GBTC's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.50 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They often move together: some diversification next to an index fund, but not a cushion. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against GBTC instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a GBTC holding.
What are the best alternatives to GBTC?
None of the 15 popular alternatives we compared outperformed GBTC in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes, which says more about GBTC's strength than about its alternatives.
Did GBTC outperform the S&P 500?
GBTC finished ahead of the S&P 500 (SPY) in six of ten full calendar years. In 2025, it returned -7.6%, against +17.7% for the index.
How did GBTC do in stock market crashes?
GBTC fell less than the S&P 500 (SPY) in none of the six major crashes it has traded through, and further in six. The clearest case was the 2022 bear market, when GBTC fell 67.8% and the S&P 500 fell 24.5%.
What diversifies GBTC?
These had a low correlation with GBTC over the past 5 years and still earned a positive 5-year return: among large ETFs, LVHI (correlation 0.11), DXJ (correlation 0.17) and EMLP (correlation 0.28); among large stocks, CAH (correlation 0.03), CLS (correlation 0.31) and FIX (correlation 0.41). A correlation near zero means the two have moved largely independently.
How we measure
- Short-term periods are 1M, 3M, 6M, YTD, 1Y; long-term periods are 3Y, 5Y, 10Y. An investment outperformed in a period when its total return, with dividends reinvested, was higher than GBTC's. Returns within 0.5 points or 3% of GBTC's, whichever is larger, count as a tie.
- "Qualified" means outperforming in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods. "All-weather" means outperforming in every long-term period and all but one short-term period.
- Popular alternatives are the funds and stocks most often compared with this one. We include only those that trade today, are not leveraged or inverse, and hold at least $200 million.
- Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily returns over 5 years, a measure of how much the price typically swings in a year. The Sharpe ratio is the return above cash for each unit of that volatility.
- A decline, or drawdown, runs from a peak to the lowest close before the next high. The worst decline ever uses all the price history we have; comparisons between funds use the past 10 years so that younger funds are judged on the same stretch.
- Sector overlap is the share of assets two funds hold in the same sectors. Correlation and the mixed-portfolio figures use monthly returns.
- Figures are computed from daily adjusted prices and update after each trading day. Past performance does not predict future results.