Relative Intelligence · US Large-Cap Growth

How Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) compares with the whole market and its popular alternatives
Built by QuantCommons' quantitative engine, this page is about relative opportunity, not data on QQQM alone. It places QQQM (Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF) against 20+ popular alternatives, its neighboring categories and the entire market of over 10,000 U.S.-listed stocks and ETFs, and surfaces what has done better on consistent outperformance, return for the risk taken, behavior in real market crashes and diversification. The result is a clearer view of where QQQM stands in the market, and of the alternatives worth a closer look.
Period covered: QQQM's full trading record, from October 2020 through September 2026. The crash tests reach back to 2000 using older funds and the S&P 500. All returns include reinvested dividends. Data as of October 20, 2026.
Data as of October 20, 2026. Full tables and charts read best on a larger screen.
On this page12 sections
Key findings
- What you're buyingQQQM is a technology bet first: 59% of assets, versus 38% in the S&P 500. QQQM and VUG (Vanguard Morningstar Growth ETF) have tracked each other (0.98). The larger fund is VUG. Consistency ↓
- Right nowOver the past 6 months, QQQM rose 11.2%, ahead of 91% of the ETFs with at least $100 million in assets. After a 22.7% loss from February 2025 to April 2025, QQQM has bounced 22.3% off the low. Market rank ↓
- Fund or market?QQQM rose 3.3% over the past 3 months, in line with the S&P 500, which rose 3.9%: a market move, not its own.
- Long termQQQM turned $10,000 into $19,800 over the past 5 years, against $18,200 in the S&P 500. QQQM's 5-year return of 98.0% puts it ahead of 92% of the ETFs with at least $100 million in assets with that much history. The S&P 500 returned 81.7%. Growth of $10,000 ↓
- In a crashIn the 2022 bear market, QQQM fell 33.4%, against 24.5% for the S&P 500. That was more than IWF (iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF, 31.2%) but less than FBCG (Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF, 38.8%). Crash tests ↓
- DiversificationAgainst the S&P 500, QQQM has a correlation of 0.92 over 5 years, more closely than 86% of ETFs with at least $100 million in assets. Next to an index fund it is more of the same, not a cushion. When the S&P 500 had a down month, QQQM usually fell with it (18 of 22 months). By year ↓
- Better options
- Popular alternatives
- SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) and XLK (State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF) were ahead of QQQM in most short and long periods.
- Nearby categories and themes
- VLUE (iShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF, US large-cap value) and PVAL (Putnam Focused Large Cap Value ETF, US large-cap value) earned more than QQQM with less volatility over the past 5 years. VLUE returned 15.9% a year at 18.4% volatility, against 14.6% a year at 22.9%.
- Whole market
- Few investments have done better on both counts: only 38 of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than QQQM with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them NVS (Novartis), RY (Royal Bank of Canada) and TD (Toronto-Dominion Bank).
How much would $10,000 in QQQM have grown?
This chart tracks a hypothetical $10,000 investment in QQQM over the past 5 years, with dividends reinvested, alongside the same amount in the S&P 500, investments that ended ahead of QQQM over the same span and QQQM's popular alternatives, among those that traded for the entire period. It shows not only where each investment ended up but also how smooth or uneven the path was.
Note: QQQM began trading on October 13, 2020, so the chart cannot reach back to the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or six other sell-offs. It covers the most recent 5 years of QQQM's record, starting at the end of September 2021.
- $10,000 invested in QQQM at the end of September 2021 would have grown to $21,372 by September 2026, more than the $19,000 it would have become in SPY, an S&P 500 fund.
- Five of the eight other investments on the chart ended ahead of QQQM, and SMH finished highest, at $48,982.
From the end of September 2021 to the end of September 2026. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 695 of the 3,628 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of QQQM; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- SMH$48,982+390% total · +37.4% a year
- XLK$27,207+172% total · +22.2% a year
- RY$23,646+136% total · +18.8% a year
- VLUE$22,395+124% total · +17.5% a year
- PVAL$21,761+118% total · +16.8% a year
- QQQM$21,372+114% total · +16.4% a year
- SPYG$20,007+100% total · +14.9% a year
- FBCG$19,485+94.8% total · +14.3% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$19,000+90.0% total · +13.7% a year
- VTV$17,967+79.7% total · +12.4% a year
QQQM at a glance
This section summarizes the key facts about the fund, its returns over periods from one to ten years and the risk it has carried, with dividends reinvested throughout. These figures serve as the baseline for every comparison that follows.
Note: QQQM began trading on October 13, 2020, so every figure here, including its worst decline, covers only the time since then. None of them reflect the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or six other sell-offs.
- QQQM's deepest decline since it began trading in 2020 was 35.0%, from November 2021 to November 2022. It took 13 months from the low to climb back to its old high.
- Over five full calendar years, QQQM's best was 2023, when it returned 55.0%, and its worst was 2022, when it lost 32.5%. It lost money in one of those years.
- QQQM is 5.5% below its all-time high.
The fund
- Issuer
- Invesco
- Began trading
- October 2020
- Expense ratio
- 0.15%per year
- Assets
- $110B
- Category
- Broad Market
Returns
- Past 1 year
- +18.0%total return
- Past 3 years
- +106%+27.3% a year
- Past 5 years
- +98.0%+14.6% a year
- Best calendar year
- +55.0%2023
- Worst calendar year
- −32.5%2022
- Losing years
- 1 of 5full calendar years
Risk
- Volatility
- 22.9%typical yearly swing, 5 years
- Sharpe ratio
- 0.71return per unit of risk, 5 years
- Worst decline ever
- −35.0%Nov 2021 to Nov 2022
- From its all-time high
- −5.5%below the peak
QQQM against the whole market
Where QQQM ranks among every stock and fund, and what across the market has done better.
How does QQQM rank among all ETFs?
This section ranks QQQM on return, volatility, risk-adjusted return and worst decline against every ETF worth at least $100 million with enough history. Where the comparisons with its popular alternatives show how QQQM stacks up against its peers, these rankings show where it stands in the market as a whole.
- QQQM's 5-year return ranks in the top 8% of the 1,560 ETFs with at least $100 million in assets with 5 years of history.
- QQQM is among the more volatile ETFs: its price swings rank in the bottom 17% of the 1,560 ETFs with at least $100 million in assets, where the top is the calmest.
Ranked against U.S.-listed ETFs with at least $100M in assets that have enough history for each measure, so the count changes from row to row; smaller ETFs and leveraged funds are left out. Lower volatility and smaller declines rank higher.
| Measure | QQQM | Rank | Standing |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +18.0% | 554 of 2,485 | top 22% |
| 3-year return | +106% | 189 of 1,949 | top 10% |
| 5-year return | +98.0% | 130 of 1,560 | top 8% |
| Volatility, 5 years | 22.9% | 1,301 of 1,560 | bottom 18% |
| Sharpe ratio, 5 years | 0.71 | 499 of 1,560 | top 32% |
What has beaten QQQM on both return and risk?
Each dot is an investment, placed by how much it earned a year over the past 5 years (higher is better) and how much its price swung, its volatility (further left is calmer). QQQM sits where the dashed lines cross. Anything in the green box above and to the left earned more than QQQM with smaller swings, a better trade-off over this period on both counts. Past results are no promise, but a name in the box is worth a closer look.
- Nine stocks and 29 ETFs worth at least $500 million sit in the green region: each earned more than QQQM over the past 5 years with smaller price swings. That is 1% of the 3,633 screened. Few investments beat it on both counts.
- Among those with at least half QQQM's swings, DXJ has the best return for its risk: 26.6% a year at 19.1% volatility, 17% less than QQQM's 22.9%, and a Sharpe ratio (return above cash per unit of volatility) of 1.34 against 0.71 for QQQM.
- None of QQQM's popular alternatives made it, but PVAL (US large-cap value) did: 16.1% a year at 15.1% volatility, 34% less than QQQM's 22.9%.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested, and volatility the annualized swing in daily prices, both over 5 years. Labeled dots are the strongest picks from the table below and the names called out above, colored by how close they sit to QQQM; faint dots are 19 more of the 38 in the green region (the strongest, one per fund family). 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million were screened. Hover over a dot for its figures.
- Popular alternatives
- Same and neighboring categories, and shared themes
- The whole market
- Others in the green region
- 1 with more than 1.6× QQQM's volatility is in the table only
Is there a better investment than QQQM?
Investments that beat QQQM over the past 5 years on return, volatility, drawdowns, consistency, crash losses or fees, from its popular alternatives out to the whole market.
- Among QQQM's popular alternatives, SMH and XLK were ahead of QQQM in most short and long periods.
- Looking beyond its popular alternatives, VLUE (US large-cap value) and PVAL (US large-cap value) earned more than QQQM with less volatility over the past 5 years. VLUE returned 15.9% a year at 18.4% volatility, against 14.6% a year at 22.9%.
- Few investments have done better on both counts: only 38 of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than QQQM with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them NVS, RY and TD.
How this works
The table below lists investments that beat QQQM over the past 5 years on at least one of these measures: a higher annual return with lower volatility, a higher annual return at similar volatility, a similar return with lower volatility, a higher Sharpe ratio with a smaller worst decline, a higher total return in most periods from 3 months to 10 years, or smaller losses in recent market crashes, and, for funds, the same exposure at a lower expense ratio. It checks QQQM's popular alternatives first, then the rest of its own and neighboring categories, then every stock and fund worth at least $500 million, and shows the strongest few in each group. The full list of those with a higher return and lower volatility than QQQM follows the table.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested. Annual return, volatility and the Sharpe ratio cover 5 years; the worst decline covers the past 10 years. Green marks a better figure than QQQM's. "On the frontier" means no other option shown or tested earned more with less volatility. Funds that hold the same thing are shown once. Beyond the popular alternatives, nothing with more than 1.5× QQQM's volatility counts as better.
These figures cover the past 5 years. Green marks a better figure than QQQM's.
| Investment | Why it is better | Past 5 years | Downside | Long run | Fit | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Annual return?higher is better | Volatility?lower is calmer | Sharpe?return per unit of risk | Worst decline?past 10 years | 5Y returntotal | Corr. with QQQM?lower diversifies more | Expenseper year | |||
| +14.6% | 22.9% | 0.71 | −35.0% | +98.0% | 1.00 | 0.15% | |||
| +12.7% | 17.1% | 0.79 | −33.7% | +81.7% | 0.92 | 0.09% | |||
| Popular alternativesbest 2 shownThe investments people most often weigh against QQQM. 2 of 20 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return in most periods | +33.4% | 36.9% | 0.97 | −45.3% | +323% | 0.89 | 0.35% | ||
| Higher return in most periods | +19.4% | 26.0% | 0.82 | −33.6% | +143% | 0.96 | 0.08% | ||
| Same and neighboring categories, and shared themesbest 5 shownEverything else in US Large-Cap Growth and US Large-Cap Equity and the categories next to it (US Growth Equity, US Large-Cap Value, US Mid-Cap Equity, US Total Market, US Quality Equity), plus QQQM's specific themes. 6 of 65 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
VLUEiShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF · US Large-Cap Value | Higher return, lower volatilityHigher return in most periods | +15.9% | 18.4% | 0.90 | −39.5% | +109% | 0.72 | 0.15% | |
AVLVAvantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF · US Large-Cap Value | Similar return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +14.0% | 16.9% | 0.86 | −19.5% | +92.2% | 0.70 | 0.15% | |
BKLCBNY Mellon US Large Cap Core Equity ETF · US Large-Cap Equity | Similar return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +13.8% | 17.3% | 0.84 | −26.2% | +91.1% | 0.93 | 0.00% | |
PVALPutnam Focused Large Cap Value ETF · US Large-Cap Value | Higher return, lower volatility | +16.1% | 15.1% | 1.07 | −41.3% | +111% | 0.66 | 0.56% | |
RWLInvesco S&P 500 Revenue ETF · US Large-Cap Equity | Similar return, lower volatility | +13.7% | 14.4% | 0.97 | −36.1% | +90.2% | 0.71 | 0.39% | |
| The whole marketbest 8 shownEvery other stock and fund worth at least $500 million. 166 of 3,548 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| On the frontierHigher return, lower volatilityHigher return in most periods | +17.3% | 18.2% | 0.97 | −40.0% | +122% | 0.44 | — | ||
DXJWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund · International Equity | On the frontierHigher return, lower volatilityHigher return in most periods | +26.6% | 19.1% | 1.34 | −39.1% | +225% | 0.46 | 0.48% | |
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher return in most periods | +15.8% | 20.0% | 0.84 | −42.0% | +109% | 0.42 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher return in most periods | +17.8% | 21.4% | 0.88 | −53.7% | +126% | 0.09 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +17.1% | 20.7% | 0.87 | −26.8% | +121% | 0.16 | — | ||
| On the frontierHigher return, similar volatilityHigher return in most periods | +42.1% | 24.7% | 1.55 | −46.1% | +479% | 0.18 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +17.7% | 18.9% | 0.96 | −26.4% | +126% | 0.09 | 0.40% | ||
DFIVDimensional - International Value ETF · International Equity | Similar return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +14.8% | 16.4% | 0.93 | −25.4% | +99.4% | 0.43 | 0.27% | |
What these numbers mean for QQQM
- Annual return
- QQQM returned 14.6% a year over the past 5 years with dividends reinvested, against 12.7% a year for the S&P 500. At that pace, $10,000 became about $19,800. Annual return is the steady yearly rate that would produce the same total result, so investments held over the same span compare fairly. Guide: What is performance and return? →
- Volatility
- QQQM's volatility over the past 5 years was 22.9%, 1.3 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, QQQM's return lands within 22.9% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump. Guide: Understanding and measuring risk (volatility) →
- Sharpe ratio
- QQQM's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.71, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so QQQM earned less for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings. Guide: Balancing reward with risk (Sharpe ratio) →
- Worst decline
- QQQM's worst fall from a peak to a low over the past 10 years was 35.0%, against 33.7% for the S&P 500. Losses and gains are not symmetric: climbing back from a 35.0% fall takes a 53.9% gain. Guide: Market crash risk and tail risk →
- Correlation
- Over the past 5 years, QQQM's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.92 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They move almost in lockstep, so holding both adds little diversification. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against QQQM instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a QQQM holding. Guide: Correlation and diversification →
Show all 38 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that earned more than QQQM with less volatility
Out of 3,633 tested over 5 years. The strongest 27 are listed, best first, with funds that hold the same thing listed once.
| # | Investment | Found in | Annual return | Volatility | Sharpe | Worst decline | 5Y return | Corr. with QQQM | Expense |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Whole market | +17.3% | 18.2% | 0.97 | −40.0% | +122% | 0.44 | — | |
| 2 | DXJWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund · International Equity | Whole market | +26.6% | 19.1% | 1.34 | −39.1% | +225% | 0.46 | 0.48% |
| 3 | Whole market | +15.8% | 20.0% | 0.84 | −42.0% | +109% | 0.42 | — | |
| 4 | Whole market | +17.8% | 21.4% | 0.88 | −53.7% | +126% | 0.09 | — | |
| 5 | Whole market | +17.1% | 20.7% | 0.87 | −26.8% | +121% | 0.16 | — | |
| 6 | Whole market | +17.7% | 18.9% | 0.96 | −26.4% | +126% | 0.09 | 0.40% | |
| 7 | VLUEiShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF · US Large-Cap Value | Same or nearby category | +15.9% | 18.4% | 0.90 | −39.5% | +109% | 0.72 | 0.15% |
| 8 | CRAKVanEck Oil Refiners ETF · Energy | Whole market | +19.8% | 20.9% | 0.97 | −58.8% | +146% | 0.19 | 0.61% |
| 9 | Whole market | +23.5% | 18.8% | 1.22 | −75.2% | +187% | 0.25 | — | |
| 10 | NXTGFirst Trust Indxx NextG ETF · Technology | Whole market | +16.2% | 19.1% | 0.89 | −33.6% | +112% | 0.84 | 0.70% |
| 11 | FFLCFidelity Fundamental Large Cap Core ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +15.7% | 16.8% | 0.95 | −19.7% | +107% | 0.79 | 0.38% |
| 12 | LVHIFranklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +17.0% | 11.1% | 1.48 | −32.4% | +119% | 0.30 | 0.40% |
| 13 | Whole market | +15.7% | 20.4% | 0.82 | −42.6% | +107% | 0.02 | — | |
| 14 | Whole market | +19.2% | 21.6% | 0.93 | −47.3% | +141% | 0.52 | — | |
| 15 | Whole market | +16.4% | 17.1% | 0.98 | −58.1% | +113% | 0.20 | — | |
| 16 | Whole market | +19.0% | 20.8% | 0.95 | −54.9% | +139% | 0.16 | — | |
| 17 | SDCIUSCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund · Bonds | Whole market | +20.6% | 18.4% | 1.12 | −45.7% | +156% | -0.06 | 0.80% |
| 18 | SPMOInvesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF · US Momentum Equity | Whole market | +18.7% | 20.8% | 0.93 | −30.9% | +136% | 0.79 | 0.13% |
| 19 | AMLPAlerian MLP ETF · Energy Equity | Whole market | +16.1% | 18.9% | 0.89 | −72.9% | +111% | 0.24 | 1.01% |
| 20 | IOOiShares Global 100 ETF · Global Equity | Whole market | +15.7% | 17.2% | 0.94 | −31.4% | +107% | 0.89 | 0.40% |
| 21 | PPAInvesco Aerospace & Defense ETF · Aerospace & Defense | Whole market | +16.3% | 18.9% | 0.90 | −43.9% | +113% | 0.47 | 0.58% |
| 22 | PVALPutnam Focused Large Cap Value ETF · US Large-Cap Value | Same or nearby category | +16.1% | 15.1% | 1.07 | −41.3% | +111% | 0.66 | 0.56% |
| 23 | MLPXGlobal X - MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF · Energy | Whole market | +18.6% | 19.7% | 0.97 | −64.6% | +135% | 0.29 | 0.45% |
| 24 | TDIVFirst Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund · Technology Equity | Whole market | +16.2% | 21.3% | 0.81 | −32.0% | +111% | 0.90 | 0.50% |
| 25 | EWPiShares MSCI Spain ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +19.2% | 20.3% | 0.97 | −46.4% | +140% | 0.37 | 0.50% |
| 26 | DBJPXtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF · International | Whole market | +20.9% | 19.2% | 1.09 | −31.3% | +159% | 0.64 | 0.45% |
| 27 | ATMPBarclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN · Broad Market | Whole market | +21.2% | 21.5% | 1.01 | −70.3% | +161% | 0.26 | 0.95% |
QQQM against its popular alternatives
The investments people most often weigh against QQQM, compared period by period and year by year.
How do QQQM's risk and return compare with its alternatives?
This map plots each investment's annual return over the past 5 years against its volatility, the size of its typical price swings. Investments toward the upper left earned more for a smoother ride, and those toward the lower right earned less for a rougher one. The dashed lines cross at QQQM, which divides the map into what did better or worse on each measure.
- None of the 16 popular alternatives earned more than QQQM over the past 5 years with smaller price swings, so every higher return on the map came with a bumpier ride.
- Over the past 5 years, QQQM returned 14.6% a year, more than the S&P 500's 12.7%, with higher volatility (22.9% against 17.1%).
Green points earned more than QQQM with less volatility; red points earned less with more. Hover over a point for its figures. Total returns with dividends reinvested, annualized.
All figures
| Investment | Annual return | Volatility |
|---|---|---|
| SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | +33.4% | 36.9% |
| XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF | +19.4% | 26.0% |
| QQQM This pageInvesco NASDAQ 100 ETF | +14.6% | 22.9% |
| QQQ Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 | +14.5% | 23.0% |
| MGK Vanguard Morningstar Mega Cap Growth ETF | +13.5% | 23.0% |
| SPYG State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF | +13.3% | 21.5% |
| SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | +13.2% | 22.4% |
| IWY iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF | +13.0% | 21.9% |
| IUSG iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF | +12.9% | 21.2% |
| ONEQ Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF | +12.9% | 22.5% |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | +12.7% | 17.1% |
| FBCG Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF | +12.3% | 26.1% |
| VUG Vanguard Morningstar Growth ETF | +12.3% | 22.5% |
| VTV Vanguard Morningstar Value ETF | +12.0% | 13.7% |
| VONG Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF | +11.9% | 21.7% |
| QQQE Direxion NASDAQ-100 Equal Weighted Index ETF | +8.1% | 20.7% |
| QQEW First Trust Nasdaq-100 Select Equal Weight ETF | +6.8% | 21.3% |
| QQQJ Invesco NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF | +5.9% | 22.2% |
Has QQQM consistently beaten its popular alternatives?
This section compares QQQM with the investments people most often weigh against it, checking each one over seven periods from one month to five years. Counting how often an alternative earned more than QQQM helps separate lasting outperformance from a single strong stretch.
- XLK outperformed QQQM in every long-term period and in all but one short-term period, the most consistent record in the group.
- Two of the 21 popular alternatives, XLK and SMH, outperformed QQQM in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 2 long-term timeframes.
- XLK and SPY earned more for the risk they took than QQQM (a higher Sharpe ratio) and fell less in their worst decline of the past 10 years.
A green cell means the alternative earned more than QQQM over that period. "Qualified" marks those that did so in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 2 long-term periods.
| Investment | Periods outperformed | Short term | Long term | Risk · 5 years | Fund | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1M | 3M | 6M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | Volatilitylower is calmer | Sharpehigher is better | Worst declinepast 10 years | Expense | Assets | Overlapsame sectors | ||
| QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (this page) | — | −3.2% | +3.3% | +11.2% | +17.5% | +18.0% | +106% | +98.0% | 22.9% | 0.71 | −35.0% | 0.15% | $110B | — |
| XLK QualifiedState Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF | 4/5 short2/2 longAll-weather | −4.8% | +5.7% | +20.3% | +29.0% | +29.3% | +131% | +143% | 26.0% | 0.82 | −33.6% | 0.08% | $125B | 59% |
| SMH QualifiedVanEck Semiconductor ETF | 3/5 short2/2 long | −8.3% | −2.2% | +17.8% | +46.4% | +57.8% | +290% | +323% | 36.9% | 0.97 | −45.3% | 0.35% | $66B | 59% |
| SPYG Broad MarketState Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF | 2/5 short1/2 long | −2.4% | +4.0% | +9.9% | +13.9% | +15.8% | +110% | +86.5% | 21.5% | 0.69 | −32.7% | 0.04% | $57B | 86% |
| VOOG Broad MarketVanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF | 2/5 short1/2 long | −2.3% | +4.0% | +9.9% | +13.9% | +15.8% | +110% | +86.0% | 21.6% | 0.69 | −32.7% | 0.07% | $28B | 86% |
| FBCG Broad MarketFidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF | 0/5 short1/2 long | −4.2% | +1.7% | +6.0% | +11.1% | +14.0% | +114% | +78.6% | 26.1% | 0.58 | −43.5% | 0.57% | $7.6B | 90% |
| VTV Broad MarketVanguard Morningstar Value ETF | 4/5 short0/2 long | +1.6% | +4.0% | +11.0% | +18.2% | +22.5% | +77.9% | +76.6% | 13.7% | 0.90 | −36.8% | 0.03% | $252B | 40% |
| QQQJ Broad MarketInvesco NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF | 3/5 short0/2 long | −0.6% | +1.9% | +7.9% | +18.5% | +23.3% | +92.4% | +33.3% | 22.2% | 0.37 | −39.6% | 0.15% | $1.2B | 66% |
| MGK TechnologyVanguard Morningstar Mega Cap Growth ETF | 2/5 short0/2 long | −2.6% | +4.7% | +9.8% | +10.8% | +11.9% | +104% | +88.2% | 23.0% | 0.67 | −36.0% | 0.05% | $35B | 89% |
| SCHG Broad MarketSchwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 2/5 short0/2 long | −1.9% | +4.2% | +9.4% | +9.7% | +10.4% | +99.2% | +85.4% | 22.4% | 0.67 | −34.5% | 0.04% | $63B | 90% |
| IVW Broad MarketiShares S&P 500 Growth ETF | 2/5 short0/2 long | −2.4% | +4.0% | +9.8% | +13.8% | +15.7% | +109% | +85.3% | 21.5% | 0.68 | −32.7% | 0.18% | $77B | 86% |
| IUSG Broad MarketiShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF | 2/5 short0/2 long | −2.3% | +3.8% | +9.4% | +13.9% | +15.9% | +107% | +83.7% | 21.2% | 0.68 | −32.4% | 0.04% | $33B | 85% |
| SPY Broad MarketState Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 2/5 short0/2 long | −0.6% | +3.9% | +9.1% | +13.5% | +15.8% | +89.3% | +81.7% | 17.1% | 0.79 | −33.7% | 0.09% | $823B | 75% |
| VUG Broad MarketVanguard Morningstar Growth ETF | 2/5 short0/2 long | −2.5% | +4.0% | +8.2% | +9.8% | +10.2% | +100% | +78.6% | 22.5% | 0.63 | −35.6% | 0.03% | $392B | 91% |
| ONEQ Broad MarketFidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF | 1/5 short0/2 long | −2.5% | +3.7% | +8.6% | +14.4% | +15.9% | +107% | +83.6% | 22.5% | 0.65 | −35.2% | 0.21% | $11B | 91% |
| QQQE Broad MarketDirexion NASDAQ-100 Equal Weighted Index ETF | 1/5 short0/2 long | −1.6% | +1.8% | +11.1% | +16.4% | +15.6% | +66.6% | +47.6% | 20.7% | 0.48 | −32.1% | 0.35% | $1.4B | 84% |
| QQEW TechnologyFirst Trust Nasdaq-100 Select Equal Weight ETF | 1/5 short0/2 long | −3.3% | +2.2% | +14.6% | +11.3% | +9.9% | +57.7% | +39.1% | 21.3% | 0.42 | −32.1% | 0.55% | $1.8B | 79% |
| QQQ Broad MarketInvesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 | 0/5 short0/2 long | −3.2% | +3.2% | +11.2% | +17.4% | +17.9% | +106% | +97.2% | 23.0% | 0.71 | −35.1% | 0.18% | $492B | 100% |
| IWY Broad MarketiShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF | 0/5 short0/2 long | −3.1% | +3.1% | +4.0% | +4.7% | +4.7% | +90.1% | +83.8% | 21.9% | 0.67 | −32.7% | 0.20% | $16B | 89% |
| VONG Broad MarketVanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF | 0/5 short0/2 long | −3.0% | +2.6% | +3.4% | +4.2% | +4.1% | +88.3% | +75.1% | 21.7% | 0.63 | −32.7% | 0.06% | $56B | 88% |
| IWF Broad MarketiShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF | 0/5 short0/2 long | −3.0% | +2.6% | +3.3% | +4.1% | +4.0% | +87.7% | +74.1% | 21.8% | 0.62 | −32.7% | 0.18% | $125B | 87% |
| QTOP Broad MarketiShares Nasdaq Top 30 Stocks ETF | 0/5 short0/2 long | −4.5% | +2.7% | +10.8% | +17.8% | +18.5% | — | — | — | — | −23.3% | 0.20% | $342M | — |
How did QQQM do year by year?
This table shows each investment's total return in every full calendar year since 2021, along with where QQQM ranked among its popular alternatives each year. Annual results reveal how consistently each one kept pace with QQQM and how far its good and bad years diverged, detail that multiyear averages tend to smooth over.
Note: QQQM began trading on October 13, 2020, so the table starts with 2021, its first full calendar year, and cannot show how it fared during the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or six other sell-offs.
- QQQM finished ahead of the S&P 500 in three of its five full calendar years, and ahead of it in each of the last three.
- Among its popular alternatives, SMH came out ahead of QQQM most often, in four of the five years both traded.
- Ranked against its popular alternatives each year, QQQM finished in the top quarter in one of five years and in the bottom quarter in no. In 2025, it ranked 7 of 18.
Newest year first. Green marks a year in which the fund came out ahead of QQQM; gray means the two finished within a fraction of a point. The rank row places QQQM among the alternatives that traded the full year; dark green is the top quarter and red the bottom quarter.
| Investment | Years ahead of QQQM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QQQM This pageInvesco NASDAQ 100 ETF | — | +20.8% | +25.7% | +55.0% | −32.5% | +27.5% |
| Rank among alternatives | Top quarter in 1 of 5 | 7 of 18 | 11 of 17 | 4 of 17 | 12 of 17 | 9 of 17 |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 2 of 5 | +17.7% | +24.9% | +26.2% | −18.2% | +28.7% |
| XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF | 3 of 5 | +24.6% | +21.6% | +56.0% | −27.7% | +34.8% |
| SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 4 of 5 | +49.2% | +39.1% | +73.4% | −33.5% | +42.1% |
| SPYG State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF | 4 of 5 | +22.1% | +36.0% | +30.0% | −29.4% | +32.0% |
| FBCG Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF | 2 of 5 | +18.6% | +39.0% | +58.0% | −39.1% | +21.3% |
| VTV Vanguard Morningstar Value ETF | 1 of 5 | +15.3% | +16.0% | +9.3% | −2.1% | +26.5% |
| QQQJ Invesco NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF | 1 of 5 | +20.4% | +15.4% | +13.7% | −28.3% | +9.8% |
| MGK Vanguard Morningstar Mega Cap Growth ETF | 2 of 5 | +20.7% | +32.9% | +51.7% | −33.6% | +28.6% |
| SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 1 of 5 | +17.4% | +34.9% | +50.1% | −31.8% | +28.1% |
| IUSG iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF | 3 of 5 | +21.2% | +34.7% | +29.3% | −28.8% | +31.3% |
| VUG Vanguard Morningstar Growth ETF | 1 of 5 | +19.4% | +32.7% | +46.8% | −33.1% | +27.4% |
| ONEQ Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF | 1 of 5 | +20.9% | +29.3% | +45.8% | −32.1% | +22.1% |
| QQQE Direxion NASDAQ-100 Equal Weighted Index ETF | 1 of 5 | +14.6% | +7.0% | +33.8% | −24.5% | +17.9% |
| QQEW First Trust Nasdaq-100 Select Equal Weight ETF | 1 of 5 | +14.2% | +7.0% | +33.3% | −24.6% | +17.8% |
| QQQ Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 | 0 of 5 | +20.8% | +25.6% | +54.9% | −32.6% | +27.4% |
| IWY iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF | 3 of 5 | +18.2% | +34.9% | +46.5% | −29.9% | +31.1% |
| VONG Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF | 2 of 5 | +18.4% | +33.2% | +42.7% | −29.2% | +27.6% |
| QTOP iShares Nasdaq Top 30 Stocks ETF | 1 of 1 | +22.2% | — | — | — | — |
Risk and diversification
How QQQM has fallen, how it held up in crashes beside the S&P 500 and its popular alternatives, and what moves independently of it.
What were QQQM's worst declines?
A drawdown is the decline from a peak to the lowest point before a new high. This section presents QQQM's five deepest drawdowns since it began trading in 2020, alongside the S&P 500's return over the same dates, and how long each took to recover. Together, these figures show how much an investor could have lost and how long it took to get back to even.
Note: QQQM began trading on October 13, 2020, so this list cannot include the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or six other sell-offs. The crash tests on this page show how older funds and the S&P 500 fared through those years.
- In all five of QQQM's worst declines, the S&P 500 held up better over the same dates.
- The longest climb back to a previous high took 13 months, after QQQM fell 35.0% from November 2021 to November 2022.
Green means QQQM fell less than the S&P 500 over the same dates. Based on daily closing prices with dividends reinvested.
| During | QQQM fell | S&P 500, same dates | Peak | Low | Time to the low | Back at the peak | Time to recover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 bear market | −35.0% | −19.7% | Nov 2021 | Nov 2022 | 12 months | Dec 2023 | 13 months |
| No named crash | −22.7% | −18.8% | Feb 2025 | Apr 2025 | 2 months | Jun 2025 | 2 months |
| No named crash | −13.6% | −7.6% | Jul 2024 | Aug 2024 | 1 month | Nov 2024 | 3 months |
| No named crash | −12.0% | −7.5% | Oct 2025 | Mar 2026 | 5 months | Apr 2026 | 1 month |
| No named crash | −11.2% | −3.7% | Jun 2026 | Jul 2026 | 1 month | Sep 2026 | 2 months |
How did QQQM do in stock market crashes?
This section measures how far QQQM, the S&P 500 and each alternative fell from peak to trough during every major market crash since 2000. A smaller decline means an investment held up better, and comparing results across crashes shows whether that resilience was consistent or a one-off.
Note: QQQM began trading on October 13, 2020, so its row reads "Not yet trading" for the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or six other sell-offs. The older alternatives and the S&P 500 show how those crashes played out.
- None of its popular alternatives fell less than QQQM in most of the crashes they both traded through.
- QQQM began trading after the 2008 financial crisis, but nine of its popular alternatives lived through it. The mildest fall among them was VUG's 50.7%, against 55.2% for the S&P 500.
- QQQM fell further than the S&P 500 in one of the two crashes it has traded through. The clearest case was the 2022 bear market, when QQQM fell 33.4% and the S&P 500 fell 24.5%.
Newest crash first. Each figure is the fund's deepest fall within the crash window; green means a smaller fall than QQQM.
| Investment | Held up better | 2023 regional bank crisisMar 2023 | 2022 bear marketJan 2022 | Covid crashFeb 2020 | Late-2018 sell-offSep 2018 | February 2018 volatility shockFeb 2018 | 2015 China and oil sell-offAug 2015 | 2011 euro debt crisisJul 2011 | 2010 flash crashMay 2010 | 2008 financial crisisOct 2007 | Dot-com bustMar 2000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QQQM This pageInvesco NASDAQ 100 ETF | — | −3.1% | −33.4% | Not yet trading | Not yet trading | Not yet trading | Not yet trading | Not yet trading | Not yet trading | Not yet trading | Not yet trading |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 1 of 2 | −3.4% | −24.5% | −33.7% | −19.3% | −6.5% | −12.8% | −17.9% | −1.5% | −55.2% | −47.5% |
| XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF | 1 of 2 | −3.2% | −32.4% | −31.1% | −23.8% | −6.7% | −12.7% | −15.9% | −2.1% | −53.0% | −82.0% |
| SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0 of 2 | −3.6% | −44.1% | −33.6% | −23.5% | −7.4% | −17.9% | −18.6% | −1.5% | −59.2% | — |
| SPYG State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF | 1 of 2 | −3.0% | −31.3% | −31.3% | −20.6% | −6.4% | −13.4% | −16.3% | −2.6% | −51.3% | — |
| FBCG Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF | 0 of 2 | −4.6% | −38.8% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| VTV Vanguard Morningstar Value ETF | 1 of 2 | −4.0% | −17.0% | −36.4% | −17.3% | −6.5% | −11.6% | −18.8% | −1.1% | −59.2% | — |
| QQQJ Invesco NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF | 0 of 2 | −4.8% | −33.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| MGK Vanguard Morningstar Mega Cap Growth ETF | 0 of 2 | −3.3% | −33.9% | −31.2% | −22.6% | −6.3% | −15.0% | −16.8% | −2.0% | — | — |
| SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 1 of 2 | −3.6% | −32.2% | −32.3% | −21.6% | −6.4% | −16.2% | −20.2% | −1.8% | — | — |
| IUSG iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF | 1 of 2 | −3.0% | −30.8% | −32.4% | −20.7% | −6.5% | −14.1% | −18.9% | −2.1% | −51.8% | — |
| VUG Vanguard Morningstar Growth ETF | 0 of 2 | −3.5% | −33.7% | −31.8% | −22.3% | −6.2% | −15.2% | −18.3% | −2.0% | −50.7% | — |
| ONEQ Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF | 1 of 2 | −3.5% | −32.5% | −30.2% | −22.7% | −6.4% | −16.3% | −18.0% | −2.9% | −55.1% | — |
| QQQE Direxion NASDAQ-100 Equal Weighted Index ETF | 1 of 2 | −3.8% | −29.0% | −30.9% | −19.4% | −6.8% | −17.2% | — | — | — | — |
| QQEW First Trust Nasdaq-100 Select Equal Weight ETF | 1 of 2 | −3.9% | −29.1% | −30.8% | −19.4% | −6.7% | −17.4% | −18.9% | −3.1% | −58.1% | — |
| QQQ Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 | 0 of 2 | −3.1% | −33.4% | −28.6% | −22.7% | −6.8% | −16.1% | −16.1% | −2.5% | −53.4% | −83.0% |
| IWY iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF | 1 of 2 | −3.1% | −31.5% | −30.8% | −22.2% | −6.5% | −12.3% | −15.8% | −2.3% | — | — |
| VONG Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF | 1 of 2 | −3.5% | −31.2% | −31.7% | −22.0% | −6.4% | −13.4% | −17.8% | — | — | — |
How closely does QQQM move with the S&P 500?
Upside capture measures how much of the S&P 500's gains an investment kept in the months the market rose, and downside capture how much of its losses it took in the months the market fell. An investment that captures more of the gains than the losses has compounded ahead of the market over time. This section compares QQQM with its popular alternatives on both measures, and on beta (how strongly each has moved with the market), over the past 5 years.
- Only SMH, XLK and VTV had a higher capture ratio (upside capture divided by downside capture) than QQQM's 1.04, out of 16 popular alternatives with the same record.
- Over the past 5 years, QQQM captured 114% of the S&P 500's gains in rising months and 110% of its losses in falling months, with a beta of 1.22. It amplified the market's moves in both directions.
Monthly total returns over the past 5 years, measured against SPY. 100% capture or a beta of 1.00 means moving in line with the S&P 500. Green marks a better figure than QQQM's: more upside, less downside or a higher capture ratio. Sorted by capture ratio.
| Investment | Upside capture | Downside capture | Capture ratio | Beta |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QQQM This pageInvesco NASDAQ 100 ETF | 114% | 110% | 1.04 | 1.22 |
| SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 177% | 116% | 1.53 | 1.72 |
| XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF | 128% | 105% | 1.22 | 1.33 |
| VTV Vanguard Morningstar Value ETF | 84% | 79% | 1.07 | 0.75 |
| QQQ Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 | 114% | 110% | 1.03 | 1.22 |
| SPYG State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF | 110% | 111% | 0.99 | 1.16 |
| IWY iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF | 108% | 109% | 0.99 | 1.16 |
| IUSG iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF | 109% | 112% | 0.98 | 1.16 |
| MGK Vanguard Morningstar Mega Cap Growth ETF | 115% | 119% | 0.97 | 1.23 |
| SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 114% | 119% | 0.96 | 1.19 |
| ONEQ Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF | 113% | 119% | 0.95 | 1.22 |
| VONG Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF | 106% | 111% | 0.95 | 1.16 |
| VUG Vanguard Morningstar Growth ETF | 112% | 120% | 0.94 | 1.22 |
| FBCG Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF | 121% | 132% | 0.91 | 1.36 |
| QQQE Direxion NASDAQ-100 Equal Weighted Index ETF | 93% | 112% | 0.83 | 1.08 |
| QQEW First Trust Nasdaq-100 Select Equal Weight ETF | 94% | 118% | 0.79 | 1.08 |
| QQQJ Invesco NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF | 97% | 133% | 0.73 | 1.13 |
What diversifies QQQM?
Correlation measures how closely two investments move together, on a scale from 1 (in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to -1 (in opposite directions). This section lists large ETFs and stocks whose returns have had a low correlation with QQQM's. Because such investments tend not to fall at the same time, pairing QQQM with them can reduce a portfolio's overall swings.
- Moving a fifth of the money in QQQM into GLD would have cut the portfolio's volatility by 17% over the past 5 years and raised its annual return (+16.4% for QQQM alone, +17.4% for the mix).
- Among large ETFs, LVHI, DXJ and EMLP have moved largely independently of QQQM over the past 5 years, with correlations of 0.46 or lower, and each still earned a positive 5-year return.
- In 2022, the one year QQQM lost money (-32.5%), MCK returned +51.8%.
Only ETFs with at least $1.0B in assets and stocks worth at least $10B, with a correlation below 0.5 over the past 5 years and a positive return, are included, ranked by Sharpe ratio; funds that hold the same thing are shown once. The year columns are the years in which QQQM lost money. The last two columns show a portfolio that is 80% QQQM and 20% the other investment, rebalanced monthly.
ETFs
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2022 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (this page) | 1.00 | +98.0% | 0.71 | −32.5% | 20.9% | +16.4% |
| LVHI InternationalFranklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 0.30 | +119% | 1.48 | +3.8% | 17.4% | +16.9% |
| DXJ InternationalWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund | 0.46 | +225% | 1.34 | +6.0% | 18.0% | +18.8% |
| EMLP Broad MarketFirst Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund | 0.38 | +101% | 1.04 | +10.4% | 18.0% | +16.6% |
| EWP Broad MarketiShares MSCI Spain ETF | 0.37 | +140% | 0.97 | −5.2% | 18.4% | +17.7% |
| GLD CommoditiesSPDR Gold Shares | 0.09 | +126% | 0.96 | −0.8% | 17.3% | +17.4% |
| XLE EnergyState Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | 0.03 | +177% | 0.93 | +64.4% | 17.6% | +18.7% |
| AMLP EnergyAlerian MLP ETF | 0.24 | +111% | 0.89 | +25.5% | 17.9% | +17.3% |
| EFV InternationaliShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF | 0.43 | +89.0% | 0.88 | −5.2% | 18.2% | +16.3% |
Stocks
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2022 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (this page) | 1.00 | +98.0% | 0.71 | −32.5% | 20.9% | +16.4% |
| CAH Medical - DistributionCardinal Health, Inc. | 0.18 | +479% | 1.55 | +54.1% | 18.4% | +21.3% |
| MCK Medical - DistributionMcKesson Corporation | 0.02 | +413% | 1.44 | +51.8% | 17.5% | +20.8% |
| MPC Oil & Gas Refining & MarketingMarathon Petroleum Corporation | 0.11 | +690% | 1.41 | +86.6% | 18.5% | +23.5% |
| HWM Aerospace & DefenseHowmet Aerospace Inc. | 0.38 | +594% | 1.36 | +24.2% | 20.4% | +23.3% |
| ATI Manufacturing - Metal FabricationATI Inc. | 0.24 | +1,008% | 1.34 | +87.5% | 21.1% | +26.5% |
Common questions
What was QQQM's worst drawdown?
QQQM's deepest decline since it began trading in 2020 was 35.0%, from November 2021 to November 2022. It took 13 months from the low to climb back to its old high. Because QQQM launched in October 2020, that record does not include the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or six other sell-offs.
What were QQQM's best and worst years?
Over five full calendar years, QQQM's best year was 2023, when it returned 55.0%. Its worst was 2022, with a return of -32.5%.
Is there a better investment than QQQM?
Among QQQM's popular alternatives, SMH and XLK were ahead of QQQM in most short and long periods. Looking beyond its popular alternatives, VLUE (US large-cap value) and PVAL (US large-cap value) earned more than QQQM with less volatility over the past 5 years. VLUE returned 15.9% a year at 18.4% volatility, against 14.6% a year at 22.9%.
Is QQQM more volatile than the S&P 500?
Yes. QQQM's volatility over the past 5 years was 22.9%, 1.3 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, QQQM's return lands within 22.9% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump.
What is QQQM's Sharpe ratio?
QQQM's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.71, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so QQQM earned less for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings.
How correlated is QQQM with the S&P 500?
Over the past 5 years, QQQM's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.92 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They move almost in lockstep, so holding both adds little diversification. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against QQQM instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a QQQM holding.
What are the best alternatives to QQQM?
Of the 21 popular alternatives we compared, two outperformed QQQM in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 2 long-term timeframes, with dividends reinvested: XLK and SMH.
Did QQQM outperform the S&P 500?
QQQM finished ahead of the S&P 500 (SPY) in three of five full calendar years. In 2025, it returned +20.8%, against +17.7% for the index.
How did QQQM do in stock market crashes?
QQQM fell less than the S&P 500 (SPY) in none of the two major crashes it has traded through, and further in one. The clearest case was the 2022 bear market, when QQQM fell 33.4% and the S&P 500 fell 24.5%.
What diversifies QQQM?
These had a low correlation with QQQM over the past 5 years and still earned a positive 5-year return: among large ETFs, LVHI (correlation 0.30), DXJ (correlation 0.46) and EMLP (correlation 0.38); among large stocks, CAH (correlation 0.18), MCK (correlation 0.02) and MPC (correlation 0.11). A correlation near zero means the two have moved largely independently.
How we measure
- Short-term periods are 1M, 3M, 6M, YTD, 1Y; long-term periods are 3Y, 5Y. An investment outperformed in a period when its total return, with dividends reinvested, was higher than QQQM's. Returns within 0.5 points or 3% of QQQM's, whichever is larger, count as a tie.
- "Qualified" means outperforming in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 2 long-term periods. "All-weather" means outperforming in every long-term period and all but one short-term period.
- Popular alternatives are the funds and stocks most often compared with this one. We include only those that trade today, are not leveraged or inverse, and hold at least $200 million.
- Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily returns over 5 years, a measure of how much the price typically swings in a year. The Sharpe ratio is the return above cash for each unit of that volatility.
- A decline, or drawdown, runs from a peak to the lowest close before the next high. The worst decline ever uses all the price history we have; comparisons between funds use the past 10 years so that younger funds are judged on the same stretch.
- Sector overlap is the share of assets two funds hold in the same sectors. Correlation and the mixed-portfolio figures use monthly returns.
- Upside and downside capture follow Morningstar's definition: the compound monthly return in the months the S&P 500 rose (or fell), divided by the S&P 500's compound return in those months. Beta measures how strongly monthly returns have moved with the S&P 500. All three use the same window for every investment.
- Figures are computed from daily adjusted prices and update after each trading day. Past performance does not predict future results.
More research
Popular alternatives to QQQM
XLKState Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF
SMHVanEck Semiconductor ETF
SPYGState Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF
VTVVanguard Morningstar Value ETF
SCHGSchwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
IVWiShares S&P 500 Growth ETF
SPYState Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF
VUGVanguard Morningstar Growth ETF
QQQInvesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
VONGVanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF
IWFiShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF