Relative Intelligence · Insurance

How Berkshire Hathaway (BRK-A) compares with the whole market and its popular alternatives
Built by QuantCommons' quantitative engine, this page is about relative opportunity, not data on BRK-A alone. It places BRK-A (Berkshire Hathaway Inc.) against 20+ popular alternatives, its neighboring categories and the entire market of over 10,000 U.S.-listed stocks and ETFs, and surfaces what has done better on consistent outperformance, return for the risk taken, behavior in real market crashes and diversification. The result is a clearer view of where BRK-A stands in the market, and of the alternatives worth a closer look.
Period covered: BRK-A's full trading record, from October 1986 through September 2026. All returns include reinvested dividends. Data as of October 20, 2026.
Data as of October 20, 2026. Full tables and charts read best on a larger screen.
On this page12 sections
Key findings
- Right nowBRK-A has outpaced the market, rising 10.0% over the past 3 months against 3.9% for the S&P 500 and 3.2% for the Nasdaq 100. Both BRK-A and the S&P 500 are within a few percent of a record high. At a glance ↓
- Stock or market?BRK-A held up far better than its industry: it rose 10.0% over the past 3 months while the insurance ETF KIE (State Street SPDR S&P Insurance ETF) fell 1.2%. The S&P 500 rose 3.9%. BRK-A rose 7.6% last month as the S&P 500 fell 0.6% and the Nasdaq 100 fell 3.2%.
- Past 1 to 3 yearsOver the past year, BRK-A rose 9.3% against 15.8% for the S&P 500 and 17.9% for the Nasdaq 100. The same gap shows up over 3 years (58.4% against 89.3%). BRK-A led its insurance peers in 2023, then fell behind CB (Chubb) and TRV (Travelers Companies) in 2025. By year ↓
- Long termBRK-A turned $10,000 into $37,300 over the past decade, against $42,100 in the S&P 500. That said, the past 5 years have been the better stretch: BRK-A rose 87.2% against 81.7% for the S&P 500, after trailing over the decade. Growth of $10,000 ↓
- In a crashAcross seven sell-offs, BRK-A has typically lost about 85% as much as the S&P 500. Crash tests ↓
- DiversificationAgainst the S&P 500, BRK-A has a correlation of 0.50 over 5 years, more closely than 73% of stocks worth at least $300 million. Next to an index fund it is some diversification, but not a hedge. Over 10 years, BRK-A's beta versus the S&P 500 was 0.75: 78% of the S&P 500's gains in rising months and 70% of its losses in falling ones. Market capture ↓
- Better options
- Nearby categories and themes
- MFC (Manulife Financial, life insurance) and AIZ (Assurant, property & casualty insurance) were ahead of BRK-A in most short and long periods, though with much bigger swings (24.0% and 25.3% volatility against 17.2%).
- Whole market
- Few investments have done better on both counts: only four of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than BRK-A with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them PVAL (Putnam Focused Large Cap Value ETF), LVHI (Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF) and EMLP (First Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund).
How much would $10,000 in BRK-A have grown?
This chart tracks a hypothetical $10,000 investment in BRK-A over the past 29 years, with dividends reinvested, alongside the same amount in the S&P 500, investments that ended ahead of BRK-A over the same span and BRK-A's popular alternatives, among those that traded for the entire period. A second view covers the past 5 years, the period the better options further down the page are judged on. It shows not only where each investment ended up but also how smooth or uneven the path was.
- $10,000 invested in BRK-A at the end of September 1997 would have grown to $166,749 by September 2026, more than the $132,907 it would have become in SPY, an S&P 500 fund.
- Five of the eight other investments on the chart ended ahead of BRK-A, and WRB finished highest, at $427,501.
Choose a period
From the end of September 1997 to the end of September 2026. The scale is logarithmic, so equal steps up the chart are equal percentage gains. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 355 of the 1,042 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of BRK-A; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- WRB$427,501+4,175% total · +13.8% a year
- RNR$333,219+3,232% total · +12.9% a year
- JPM$189,407+1,794% total · +10.7% a year
- TRV$178,972+1,690% total · +10.5% a year
- NSC$171,092+1,611% total · +10.3% a year
- BRK-A$166,749+1,567% total · +10.2% a year
- AFG$153,838+1,438% total · +9.9% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$132,907+1,229% total · +9.3% a year
- ALL$108,708+987% total · +8.6% a year
- HIG$51,932+419% total · +5.8% a year
From the end of September 2021 to the end of September 2026. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 1,038 of the 3,628 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of BRK-A; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- MFC$28,001+180% total · +22.9% a year
- TRV$25,788+158% total · +20.9% a year
- RNR$23,680+137% total · +18.8% a year
- JPM$22,905+129% total · +18.0% a year
- IUS$19,997+100.0% total · +14.9% a year
- ALL$19,616+96.2% total · +14.4% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$19,000+90.0% total · +13.7% a year
- THG$18,550+85.5% total · +13.2% a year
- BRK-A$18,159+81.6% total · +12.7% a year
- AFG$15,796+58.0% total · +9.6% a year
BRK-A at a glance
This section summarizes the key facts about the stock, its returns over periods from one to ten years and the risk it has carried, with dividends reinvested throughout. These figures serve as the baseline for every comparison that follows.
- BRK-A's deepest decline since it began trading in 1986 was 51.5%, from December 2007 to March 2009. It took about four years from the low to climb back to its old high.
- BRK-A is trading within 1% of its all-time high.
- Over 29 full calendar years, BRK-A's best was 1998, when it returned 52.2%, and its worst was 2008, when it lost 31.8%. It lost money in five of those years.
The company
- Market value
- $1.2T
- Industry
- Insurance - Diversified
- Price history from
- October 1986
Returns
- Past 1 year
- +9.3%total return
- Past 3 years
- +58.4%+16.6% a year
- Past 5 years
- +87.2%+13.4% a year
- Past 10 years
- +273%+14.1% a year
- Best calendar year
- +52.2%1998
- Worst calendar year
- −31.8%2008
- Losing years
- 5 of 29full calendar years
Risk
- Volatility
- 17.2%typical yearly swing, 5 years
- Sharpe ratio
- 0.82return per unit of risk, 5 years
- Worst decline ever
- −51.5%Dec 2007 to Mar 2009
- From its all-time high
- At its highwithin 1%
BRK-A against the whole market
Where BRK-A ranks among every stock and fund, and what across the market has done better.
How does BRK-A rank among all stocks?
This section ranks BRK-A on return, volatility, risk-adjusted return and worst decline against every stock worth at least $300 million with enough history. Where the comparisons with its popular alternatives show how BRK-A stacks up against its peers, these rankings show where it stands in the market as a whole.
- BRK-A's worst decline of the past 10 years ranks in the top 1% of the 2,187 stocks worth at least $300 million, where the top fell the least.
Ranked against U.S.-listed stocks worth at least $300M that have enough history for each measure, so the count changes from row to row; smaller stocks are left out. Lower volatility and smaller declines rank higher.
| Measure | BRK-A | Rank | Standing |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +9.3% | 1,608 of 3,287 | top 49% |
| 3-year return | +58.4% | 1,422 of 3,017 | top 47% |
| 5-year return | +87.2% | 763 of 2,893 | top 26% |
| 10-year return | +273% | 654 of 2,202 | top 30% |
| Volatility, 5 years | 17.2% | 38 of 2,893 | top 1% |
| Sharpe ratio, 5 years | 0.82 | 262 of 2,893 | top 9% |
| Worst decline, past 10 years | −30.4% | 25 of 2,187 | top 1% |
What has beaten BRK-A on both return and risk?
Each dot is an investment, placed by how much it earned a year over the past 5 years (higher is better) and how much its price swung, its volatility (further left is calmer). BRK-A sits where the dashed lines cross. Anything in the green box above and to the left earned more than BRK-A with smaller swings, a better trade-off over this period on both counts. Past results are no promise, but a name in the box is worth a closer look.
- Four ETFs worth at least $500 million sit in the green region: each earned more than BRK-A over the past 5 years with smaller price swings. That is fewer than 1% of the 3,633 screened. Few investments beat it on both counts.
- Among those with at least half BRK-A's swings, LVHI has the best return for its risk: 17.0% a year at 11.1% volatility, 36% less than BRK-A's 17.2%, and a Sharpe ratio (return above cash per unit of volatility) of 1.48 against 0.82 for BRK-A.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested, and volatility the annualized swing in daily prices, both over 5 years. Labeled dots are the strongest picks from the table below and the names called out above, colored by how close they sit to BRK-A; faint dots are 2 more of the 4 in the green region (the strongest, one per fund family). 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million were screened. Hover over a dot for its figures.
- Popular alternatives
- Same and neighboring categories, and shared themes
- The whole market
- Others in the green region
Is there a better investment than BRK-A?
Investments that beat BRK-A over the past 5 years on return, volatility, drawdowns, consistency, crash losses or fees, from its popular alternatives out to the whole market.
- Among BRK-A's popular alternatives, TRV, ALL and AFG were ahead of BRK-A in most short and long periods, though with much bigger swings (22.3%, 26.2% and 22.6% volatility against 17.2%).
- Looking beyond its popular alternatives, MFC (life insurance) and AIZ (property & casualty insurance) were ahead of BRK-A in most short and long periods, though with much bigger swings (24.0% and 25.3% volatility against 17.2%).
- Few investments have done better on both counts: only four of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than BRK-A with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them PVAL, LVHI and EMLP.
How this works
The table below lists investments that beat BRK-A over the past 5 years on at least one of these measures: a higher annual return with lower volatility, a higher annual return at similar volatility, a similar return with lower volatility, a higher Sharpe ratio with a smaller worst decline, a higher total return in most periods from 3 months to 10 years, or smaller losses in recent market crashes. It checks BRK-A's popular alternatives first, then the rest of its own and neighboring categories, then every stock and fund worth at least $500 million, and shows the strongest few in each group. The full list of those with a higher return and lower volatility than BRK-A follows the table.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested. Annual return, volatility and the Sharpe ratio cover 5 years; the worst decline covers the past 10 years. Green marks a better figure than BRK-A's. "On the frontier" means no other option shown or tested earned more with less volatility. Funds that hold the same thing are shown once. Beyond the popular alternatives, nothing with more than 1.5× BRK-A's volatility counts as better.
These figures cover the past 5 years. Green marks a better figure than BRK-A's.
| Investment | Why it is better | Past 5 years | Downside | Long run | Fit | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Annual return?higher is better | Volatility?lower is calmer | Sharpe?return per unit of risk | Worst decline?past 10 years | 10Y returntotal | Corr. with BRK-A?lower diversifies more | Expenseper year | |||
| +13.4% | 17.2% | 0.82 | −30.4% | +273% | 1.00 | — | |||
| +12.7% | 17.1% | 0.79 | −33.7% | +321% | 0.50 | 0.09% | |||
| Popular alternativesbest 3 shownThe investments people most often weigh against BRK-A. 3 of 23 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return in most periods | +22.4% | 22.3% | 1.02 | −46.3% | +347% | 0.62 | — | ||
| Higher return in most periods | +17.0% | 26.2% | 0.73 | −41.4% | +356% | 0.49 | — | ||
AFGAmerican Financial Group, Inc. · Property & Casualty Insurance | Higher return in most periods | +9.8% | 22.6% | 0.53 | −59.0% | +321% | 0.54 | — | |
| Same and neighboring categories, and shared themesbest 3 shownEverything else in Insurance and the categories next to it (Property & Casualty Insurance, Life Insurance), plus BRK-A's specific themes. 3 of 42 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return in most periods | +22.6% | 24.0% | 0.97 | −57.5% | +373% | 0.52 | — | ||
AIZAssurant, Inc. · Property & Casualty Insurance | Higher return in most periods | +13.3% | 25.3% | 0.62 | −44.6% | +312% | 0.43 | — | |
THGThe Hanover Insurance Group, Inc. · Property & Casualty Insurance | Higher return in most periods | +14.4% | 22.9% | 0.70 | −40.1% | +291% | 0.49 | — | |
| The whole marketbest 8 shownEvery other stock and fund worth at least $500 million. 65 of 3,568 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
IUSInvesco RAFI Strategic US ETF · Broad Market | Higher return, lower volatilityHigher return in most periods | +14.7% | 14.9% | 1.00 | −34.7% | — | 0.61 | 0.19% | |
| On the frontierHigher return in most periods | +26.1% | 23.4% | 1.11 | −45.1% | +603% | 0.48 | — | ||
| On the frontierHigher return in most periods | +42.1% | 24.7% | 1.55 | −46.1% | +349% | 0.40 | — | ||
SDCIUSCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund · Bonds | On the frontierHigher return, similar volatilityHigher return in most periods | +20.6% | 18.4% | 1.12 | −45.7% | — | 0.20 | 0.80% | |
LVHIFranklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF · International Equity | On the frontierHigher return, lower volatility | +17.0% | 11.1% | 1.48 | −32.4% | +194% | 0.60 | 0.40% | |
| Higher return in most periods | +12.8% | 22.9% | 0.64 | −36.4% | +429% | 0.60 | — | ||
SIXAETC 6 Meridian Mega Cap Equity ETF · Broad Market | Similar return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +12.8% | 12.7% | 1.01 | −18.4% | — | 0.70 | 0.31% | |
HDViShares Core High Dividend ETF · US Dividend Equity | Similar return, lower volatility | +12.9% | 13.0% | 1.00 | −37.0% | +172% | 0.69 | 0.08% | |
What these numbers mean for BRK-A
- Annual return
- BRK-A returned 13.4% a year over the past 5 years with dividends reinvested, against 12.7% a year for the S&P 500. At that pace, $10,000 became about $18,700. Annual return is the steady yearly rate that would produce the same total result, so investments held over the same span compare fairly. Guide: What is performance and return? →
- Volatility
- BRK-A's volatility over the past 5 years was 17.2%, 1.0 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, BRK-A's return lands within 17.2% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump. Guide: Understanding and measuring risk (volatility) →
- Sharpe ratio
- BRK-A's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.82, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so BRK-A earned more for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings. Guide: Balancing reward with risk (Sharpe ratio) →
- Worst decline
- BRK-A's worst fall from a peak to a low over the past 10 years was 30.4%, against 33.7% for the S&P 500. Losses and gains are not symmetric: climbing back from a 30.4% fall takes a 43.7% gain. Guide: Market crash risk and tail risk →
- Correlation
- Over the past 5 years, BRK-A's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.50 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They often move together: some diversification next to an index fund, but not a cushion. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against BRK-A instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a BRK-A holding. Guide: Correlation and diversification →
Show all 4 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that earned more than BRK-A with less volatility
Out of 3,633 tested over 5 years. Best first; funds that hold the same thing are listed once.
| # | Investment | Found in | Annual return | Volatility | Sharpe | Worst decline | 10Y return | Corr. with BRK-A | Expense |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | IUSInvesco RAFI Strategic US ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +14.7% | 14.9% | 1.00 | −34.7% | — | 0.61 | 0.19% |
| 2 | LVHIFranklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +17.0% | 11.1% | 1.48 | −32.4% | +194% | 0.60 | 0.40% |
| 3 | PVALPutnam Focused Large Cap Value ETF · US Large-Cap Value | Whole market | +16.1% | 15.1% | 1.07 | −41.3% | — | 0.62 | 0.56% |
| 4 | EMLPFirst Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund · Energy Infrastructure | Whole market | +14.9% | 14.5% | 1.04 | −43.6% | +150% | 0.65 | 0.95% |
BRK-A against its popular alternatives
The investments people most often weigh against BRK-A, compared period by period and year by year.
How do BRK-A's risk and return compare with its alternatives?
This map plots each investment's annual return over the past 5 years against its volatility, the size of its typical price swings. Investments toward the upper left earned more for a smoother ride, and those toward the lower right earned less for a rougher one. The dashed lines cross at BRK-A, which divides the map into what did better or worse on each measure.
- Only BRK-B was both more rewarding and calmer than BRK-A over the past 5 years, earning a higher annual return with lower volatility.
- Over the past 5 years, BRK-A returned 13.4% a year, more than the S&P 500's 12.7%, with higher volatility (17.2% against 17.1%).
Green points earned more than BRK-A with less volatility; red points earned less with more. Hover over a point for its figures. Total returns with dividends reinvested, annualized.
All figures
| Investment | Annual return | Volatility |
|---|---|---|
| TRV The Travelers Companies, Inc. | +22.4% | 22.3% |
| PGR The Progressive Corporation | +21.3% | 25.6% |
| ACGL Arch Capital Group Ltd. | +20.1% | 24.5% |
| RNR RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd. | +20.1% | 27.8% |
| WRB W. R. Berkley Corporation | +18.9% | 22.9% |
| JPM JPMorgan Chase & Co. | +17.3% | 24.3% |
| ALL The Allstate Corporation | +17.0% | 26.2% |
| AXS AXIS Capital Holdings Limited | +16.7% | 25.2% |
| CB Chubb Limited | +15.7% | 20.4% |
| HIG The Hartford Insurance Group, Inc. | +15.6% | 22.0% |
| L Loews Corporation | +14.3% | 19.2% |
| BRK-B Berkshire Hathaway Inc. | +13.4% | 17.1% |
| BRK-A This pageBerkshire Hathaway Inc. | +13.4% | 17.2% |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | +12.7% | 17.1% |
| CINF Cincinnati Financial Corporation | +10.2% | 25.7% |
| AFG American Financial Group, Inc. | +9.8% | 22.6% |
| EG Everest Group, Ltd. | +9.4% | 25.7% |
| CNA CNA Financial Corporation | +9.2% | 21.6% |
| AIG American International Group, Inc. | +9.0% | 25.9% |
| RLI RLI Corp. | +8.1% | 23.9% |
| MKL Markel Corporation | +7.3% | 22.4% |
| UNP Union Pacific Corporation | +7.1% | 22.9% |
| NSC Norfolk Southern Corporation | +5.3% | 24.8% |
| NEE NextEra Energy, Inc. | +1.5% | 26.8% |
Has BRK-A consistently beaten its popular alternatives?
This section compares BRK-A with the investments people most often weigh against it, checking each one over eight periods from one month to ten years. Counting how often an alternative earned more than BRK-A helps separate lasting outperformance from a single strong stretch.
- Four of the 23 popular alternatives, led by ALL, TRV and AFG, outperformed BRK-A in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes.
- PGR and BRK-B earned more for the risk they took than BRK-A (a higher Sharpe ratio) and fell less in their worst decline of the past 10 years.
- JPM outperformed BRK-A over all three long-term periods but in only one of the five short-term ones, so BRK-A has had the better of it lately.
A green cell means the alternative earned more than BRK-A over that period. "Qualified" marks those that did so in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods.
| Investment | Periods outperformed | Short term | Long term | Risk · 5 years | Fund | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1M | 3M | 6M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | 10Y | Volatilitylower is calmer | Sharpehigher is better | Worst declinepast 10 years | Expense | Assets | Overlapsame sectors | ||
| BRK-A Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (this page) | — | +7.6% | +10.0% | +14.5% | +8.8% | +9.3% | +58.4% | +87.2% | +273% | 17.2% | 0.82 | −30.4% | — | $1.2T | — |
| ALL QualifiedThe Allstate Corporation | 3/5 short3/3 long | +2.9% | −1.1% | +17.3% | +24.4% | +31.5% | +116% | +119% | +356% | 26.2% | 0.73 | −41.4% | — | $63B | — |
| TRV QualifiedThe Travelers Companies, Inc. | 3/5 short3/3 long | +6.6% | +7.8% | +32.6% | +40.3% | +51.5% | +158% | +174% | +347% | 22.3% | 1.02 | −46.3% | — | $83B | — |
| AFG QualifiedAmerican Financial Group, Inc. | 3/5 short2/3 long | +6.4% | +5.6% | +16.3% | +15.0% | +20.4% | +66.9% | +59.7% | +321% | 22.6% | 0.53 | −59.0% | — | $12B | — |
| RNR QualifiedRenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd. | 3/5 short2/3 long | +8.6% | +10.3% | +13.6% | +30.7% | +43.3% | +66.5% | +149% | +215% | 27.8% | 0.80 | −40.7% | — | $15B | — |
| JPM Banks - DiversifiedJPMorgan Chase & Co. | 1/5 short3/3 long | −4.3% | −0.6% | +6.8% | +5.0% | +13.0% | +150% | +122% | +537% | 24.3% | 0.78 | −43.6% | — | $891B | — |
| HIG Insurance - DiversifiedThe Hartford Insurance Group, Inc. | 1/5 short3/3 long | +4.3% | −2.5% | −0.9% | +0.8% | +12.1% | +105% | +106% | +294% | 22.0% | 0.77 | −57.6% | — | $37B | — |
| WRB Insurance - Property & CasualtyW. R. Berkley Corporation | 0/5 short3/3 long | +6.3% | +0.7% | +11.7% | +6.7% | +2.3% | +87.3% | +138% | +443% | 22.9% | 0.87 | −45.3% | — | $27B | — |
| NSC RailroadsNorfolk Southern Corporation | 2/5 short2/3 long | +5.3% | −2.4% | +7.9% | +14.6% | +13.8% | +72.0% | +29.5% | +328% | 24.8% | 0.33 | −44.4% | — | $73B | — |
| SPY Broad MarketState Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 2/5 short2/3 long | −0.6% | +3.9% | +9.1% | +13.5% | +15.8% | +89.3% | +81.7% | +321% | 17.1% | 0.79 | −33.7% | 0.09% | $823B | — |
| CB Insurance - Property & CasualtyChubb Limited | 2/5 short2/3 long | +6.1% | +1.8% | +9.1% | +16.4% | +35.0% | +78.9% | +107% | +248% | 20.4% | 0.82 | −42.6% | — | $138B | — |
| ACGL Insurance - DiversifiedArch Capital Group Ltd. | 1/5 short2/3 long | +5.8% | −0.5% | +3.9% | +7.9% | +16.5% | +28.7% | +150% | +309% | 24.5% | 0.87 | −53.8% | — | $35B | — |
| L Insurance - Property & CasualtyLoews Corporation | 1/5 short2/3 long | +4.3% | −2.8% | +0.4% | +6.6% | +12.5% | +78.4% | +94.9% | +180% | 19.2% | 0.80 | −48.5% | — | $23B | — |
| AXS Insurance - DiversifiedAXIS Capital Holdings Limited | 1/5 short2/3 long | +3.1% | −12.2% | −0.4% | −2.3% | +11.1% | +90.4% | +116% | +137% | 25.2% | 0.74 | −49.3% | — | $7.3B | — |
| PGR Insurance - Property & CasualtyThe Progressive Corporation | 0/5 short2/3 long | +4.6% | +4.6% | +9.0% | +4.8% | +7.7% | +56.8% | +162% | +816% | 25.6% | 0.89 | −30.3% | — | $129B | — |
| UNP RailroadsUnion Pacific Corporation | 3/5 short1/3 long | +6.7% | −2.5% | +15.2% | +25.9% | +29.2% | +45.4% | +41.2% | +295% | 22.9% | 0.42 | −38.7% | — | $171B | — |
| CINF Insurance - Property & CasualtyCincinnati Financial Corporation | 1/5 short1/3 long | +3.7% | −4.1% | +4.8% | +8.4% | +13.6% | +87.6% | +62.7% | +203% | 25.7% | 0.51 | −58.1% | — | $26B | — |
| BRK-B Insurance - DiversifiedBerkshire Hathaway Inc. | 0/5 short1/3 long | +7.5% | +9.9% | +14.3% | +8.6% | +9.3% | +60.7% | +87.8% | +274% | 17.1% | 0.82 | −29.6% | — | $1.2T | — |
| NEE Regulated ElectricNextEra Energy, Inc. | 0/5 short1/3 long | −1.0% | −9.7% | −13.0% | −0.4% | −4.3% | +65.9% | +7.5% | +228% | 26.8% | 0.19 | −45.0% | — | $165B | — |
| CNA Insurance - Property & CasualtyCNA Financial Corporation | 2/5 short0/3 long | +1.3% | −7.7% | +3.6% | +10.9% | +15.2% | +56.4% | +55.2% | +183% | 21.6% | 0.52 | −45.9% | — | $13B | — |
| EG Insurance - ReinsuranceEverest Group, Ltd. | 2/5 short0/3 long | +6.4% | +4.3% | +13.4% | +19.6% | +14.8% | +6.0% | +57.0% | +155% | 25.7% | 0.48 | −44.2% | — | $15B | — |
| RLI Insurance - Property & CasualtyRLI Corp. | 1/5 short0/3 long | +6.2% | +1.9% | +13.5% | +5.4% | +14.2% | +8.4% | +47.7% | +206% | 23.9% | 0.45 | −43.5% | — | $5.8B | — |
| AIG Insurance - DiversifiedAmerican International Group, Inc. | 1/5 short0/3 long | +9.8% | +3.3% | +5.6% | −1.0% | +8.0% | +47.1% | +54.1% | +75.5% | 25.9% | 0.47 | −69.6% | — | $43B | — |
| MKL Insurance - Property & CasualtyMarkel Corporation | 0/5 short0/3 long | +6.2% | −4.8% | −4.1% | −11.6% | −1.2% | +29.8% | +42.3% | +110% | 22.4% | 0.43 | −44.7% | — | $23B | — |
How did BRK-A do year by year?
This table shows each investment's total return in every full calendar year since 1997, along with where BRK-A ranked among its popular alternatives each year. Annual results reveal how consistently each one kept pace with BRK-A and how far its good and bad years diverged, detail that multiyear averages tend to smooth over.
- BRK-A finished ahead of the S&P 500 in 14 of its 29 full calendar years.
- Among its popular alternatives, UNP came out ahead of BRK-A most often, in 19 of the 29 years both traded.
- Ranked against its popular alternatives each year, BRK-A finished in the top quarter in five of 29 years and in the bottom quarter in three. In 2025, it ranked 15 of 23.
Newest year first. Green marks a year in which the fund came out ahead of BRK-A; gray means the two finished within a fraction of a point. The rank row places BRK-A among the alternatives that traded the full year; dark green is the top quarter and red the bottom quarter.
| Investment | Years ahead of BRK-A | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | 1998 | 1997 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BRK-A This pageBerkshire Hathaway Inc. | — | +10.8% | +25.5% | +15.8% | +4.0% | +29.6% | +2.4% | +11.0% | +2.8% | +21.9% | +23.4% | −12.5% | +27.0% | +32.7% | +16.8% | −4.7% | +21.4% | +2.7% | −31.8% | +28.7% | +24.1% | +0.8% | +4.3% | +15.8% | −3.8% | +6.5% | +26.6% | −19.9% | +52.2% | +34.9% |
| Rank among alternatives | Top quarter in 5 of 29 | 15 of 23 | 13 of 23 | 6 of 23 | 14 of 23 | 5 of 23 | 7 of 23 | 20 of 23 | 11 of 23 | 10 of 23 | 10 of 23 | 21 of 23 | 4 of 23 | 15 of 23 | 13 of 23 | 17 of 23 | 11 of 23 | 14 of 23 | 16 of 23 | 3 of 23 | 8 of 23 | 20 of 23 | 16 of 23 | 17 of 22 | 12 of 22 | 9 of 22 | 15 of 22 | 11 of 22 | 2 of 22 | 13 of 22 |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 11 of 29 | +17.7% | +24.9% | +26.2% | −18.2% | +28.7% | +18.3% | +31.2% | −4.6% | +21.7% | +12.0% | +1.2% | +13.5% | +32.3% | +16.0% | +1.9% | +15.1% | +26.4% | −36.8% | +5.1% | +15.9% | +4.8% | +10.7% | +28.2% | −21.6% | −11.7% | −9.8% | +20.4% | +28.7% | +33.5% |
| ALL The Allstate Corporation | 14 of 29 | +10.1% | +40.6% | +6.4% | +18.4% | +9.9% | −0.1% | +38.8% | −19.5% | +43.6% | +21.7% | −9.9% | +31.2% | +38.6% | +50.2% | −11.4% | +9.1% | −5.1% | −34.5% | −17.6% | +23.4% | +6.9% | +23.1% | +19.4% | +12.3% | −21.0% | +85.6% | −36.4% | −13.8% | +58.5% |
| TRV The Travelers Companies, Inc. | 15 of 29 | +22.4% | +28.8% | +3.9% | +22.4% | +14.0% | +5.3% | +17.0% | −9.7% | +13.4% | +11.0% | +9.1% | +19.6% | +29.1% | +24.8% | +9.3% | +14.8% | +13.5% | −13.8% | +2.4% | +22.9% | +23.2% | −3.6% | +20.3% | −20.1% | −16.9% | +65.7% | 0.0% | −12.9% | +43.6% |
| AFG American Financial Group, Inc. | 15 of 29 | +5.4% | +23.8% | −7.6% | +10.9% | +93.8% | −16.2% | +27.1% | −13.0% | +29.2% | +25.8% | +22.2% | +8.7% | +51.2% | +9.9% | +16.5% | +32.2% | +11.7% | −19.1% | −18.6% | +42.4% | +24.4% | +20.2% | +17.4% | −4.1% | −3.8% | +5.0% | −38.0% | +11.6% | +9.5% |
| RNR RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd. | 17 of 29 | +13.7% | +27.8% | +7.2% | +9.9% | +3.1% | −14.7% | +47.8% | +7.5% | −6.9% | +21.6% | +17.8% | +1.0% | +21.3% | +10.8% | +18.6% | +21.9% | +5.1% | −12.8% | +2.0% | +38.3% | −13.8% | +7.7% | +25.7% | +26.4% | +24.4% | +97.8% | +16.2% | −14.7% | +36.9% |
| JPM JPMorgan Chase & Co. | 16 of 29 | +37.3% | +44.3% | +30.6% | −12.6% | +27.8% | −5.5% | +47.3% | −6.6% | +26.8% | +34.5% | +8.4% | +9.9% | +36.7% | +36.2% | −19.9% | +2.3% | +34.4% | −25.1% | −6.9% | +25.7% | +5.7% | +10.0% | +60.5% | −30.7% | −17.4% | −10.1% | +11.7% | +32.9% | +25.5% |
| HIG The Hartford Insurance Group, Inc. | 15 of 29 | +28.1% | +38.5% | +8.6% | +12.3% | +44.3% | −17.0% | +39.8% | −19.2% | +20.3% | +11.8% | +6.1% | +17.1% | +64.1% | +40.9% | −37.5% | +14.8% | +43.8% | −79.8% | −4.6% | +10.8% | +25.8% | +19.5% | +33.0% | −26.3% | −9.6% | +51.9% | −12.1% | +19.3% | +41.5% |
| WRB W. R. Berkley Corporation | 14 of 29 | +23.0% | +27.9% | +0.3% | +33.9% | +27.4% | −3.1% | +43.8% | +5.7% | +9.9% | +23.7% | +7.8% | +21.8% | +16.1% | +13.6% | +27.1% | +12.3% | −19.9% | +5.2% | −13.1% | +9.2% | +52.6% | +36.1% | +33.2% | +10.8% | +15.2% | +131% | −37.4% | −21.1% | +32.0% |
| NSC Norfolk Southern Corporation | 16 of 29 | +25.7% | +1.6% | −1.6% | −15.6% | +27.3% | +24.8% | +32.4% | +5.2% | +36.8% | +31.5% | −20.3% | +20.8% | +54.2% | −12.7% | +18.8% | +22.8% | +15.2% | −4.8% | +2.2% | +13.8% | +25.6% | +55.3% | +20.2% | +10.4% | +39.5% | −31.8% | −33.5% | +6.6% | +6.6% |
| CB Chubb Limited | 13 of 29 | +14.5% | +23.9% | +4.2% | +16.0% | +27.9% | +1.4% | +22.9% | −9.6% | +12.8% | +15.6% | +5.3% | +14.4% | +31.9% | +17.6% | +14.5% | +26.4% | −1.8% | −13.0% | +3.8% | +15.4% | +27.5% | +5.3% | +44.3% | −25.4% | −3.7% | +159% | −50.6% | +7.8% | +62.3% |
| ACGL Arch Capital Group Ltd. | 14 of 29 | +3.9% | +30.8% | +18.3% | +41.2% | +23.2% | −15.9% | +60.5% | −11.7% | +5.2% | +23.7% | +18.1% | −1.0% | +35.6% | +18.2% | +26.9% | +23.0% | +2.0% | −0.3% | +4.1% | +23.5% | +41.3% | −2.9% | +28.0% | +21.0% | +72.2% | +18.8% | −42.2% | −2.1% | +14.6% |
| L Loews Corporation | 11 of 29 | +24.7% | +22.1% | +19.8% | +1.4% | +28.9% | −13.7% | +15.9% | −8.6% | +7.2% | +22.7% | −8.1% | −12.4% | +19.0% | +8.9% | −2.6% | +7.8% | +29.8% | −43.5% | +22.0% | +32.0% | +36.0% | +43.6% | +12.8% | −18.8% | +8.1% | +73.3% | −37.5% | −6.4% | +13.7% |
| AXS AXIS Capital Holdings Limited | 9 of 22 | +23.0% | +63.9% | +5.5% | +2.6% | +11.8% | −11.9% | +18.3% | +5.7% | −21.0% | +19.1% | +12.5% | +10.0% | +40.5% | +11.6% | −8.1% | +29.7% | +0.6% | −23.4% | +18.9% | +8.8% | +16.7% | −4.8% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| PGR The Progressive Corporation | 17 of 29 | −3.0% | +51.4% | +23.2% | +26.8% | +10.8% | +41.5% | +25.1% | +9.4% | +61.6% | +14.9% | +21.1% | +5.3% | +30.9% | +15.5% | +0.2% | +17.2% | +21.5% | −22.1% | −13.2% | −16.9% | +37.8% | +1.7% | +68.5% | 0.0% | +44.3% | +42.2% | −56.6% | +41.6% | +78.3% |
| UNP Union Pacific Corporation | 19 of 29 | +3.9% | −5.1% | +21.6% | −15.9% | +23.3% | +17.6% | +33.7% | +5.3% | +32.3% | +36.0% | −32.9% | +44.5% | +36.3% | +21.2% | +16.7% | +47.6% | +36.6% | −22.7% | +38.3% | +15.8% | +21.8% | −1.3% | +17.9% | +6.5% | +14.0% | +18.7% | −1.5% | −26.8% | +7.0% |
| CINF Cincinnati Financial Corporation | 18 of 29 | +16.3% | +42.5% | +4.0% | −7.9% | +33.3% | −14.1% | +38.9% | +6.3% | +1.0% | +31.5% | +19.0% | +2.6% | +38.4% | +34.2% | +1.5% | +27.5% | −3.6% | −22.8% | −9.8% | +4.4% | +9.1% | +14.2% | +14.0% | +0.7% | −1.4% | +29.5% | −13.2% | −20.7% | +121% |
| BRK-B Berkshire Hathaway Inc. | 6 of 29 | +10.9% | +27.1% | +15.5% | +3.3% | +28.9% | +2.4% | +10.9% | +3.0% | +21.6% | +23.4% | −12.1% | +26.6% | +32.2% | +17.6% | −4.8% | +21.9% | +2.2% | −32.1% | +29.2% | +24.9% | 0.0% | +4.3% | +16.2% | −4.0% | +7.3% | +28.6% | −22.1% | +52.7% | +38.4% |
| NEE NextEra Energy, Inc. | 16 of 29 | +15.5% | +21.5% | −25.3% | −8.5% | +23.4% | +30.0% | +42.6% | +14.3% | +34.4% | +18.5% | +0.8% | +27.9% | +27.9% | +17.9% | +21.9% | +2.3% | +9.0% | −23.5% | +27.9% | +35.5% | +15.2% | +18.5% | +13.0% | +11.3% | −18.5% | +74.7% | −28.0% | +8.2% | +33.0% |
| CNA CNA Financial Corporation | 9 of 29 | +7.0% | +24.0% | +7.1% | +3.8% | +19.0% | −5.4% | +9.5% | −11.1% | +37.1% | +30.0% | −2.3% | −5.3% | +56.5% | +6.9% | +0.3% | +12.7% | +45.9% | −50.4% | −15.8% | +23.2% | +22.4% | +11.0% | −5.9% | −12.2% | −24.7% | −0.5% | −3.3% | −5.5% | +19.4% |
| EG Everest Group, Ltd. | 13 of 29 | −4.1% | +4.6% | +8.7% | +23.7% | +19.8% | −13.0% | +30.2% | +0.7% | +3.9% | +21.1% | +9.9% | +11.4% | +44.0% | +33.3% | +1.4% | +1.4% | +15.5% | −22.3% | +4.3% | −1.6% | +12.6% | +6.4% | +53.8% | −21.4% | −0.8% | +223% | −42.2% | −5.1% | +44.2% |
| RLI RLI Corp. | 16 of 29 | −19.1% | +27.6% | +3.8% | +24.8% | +10.7% | +18.1% | +33.2% | +16.7% | +0.4% | +6.8% | +31.1% | +9.6% | +57.9% | −2.7% | +52.1% | +13.7% | −11.0% | +9.6% | +2.2% | +14.5% | +21.8% | +12.5% | +36.0% | +24.6% | +2.5% | +33.8% | +4.1% | −15.2% | +50.0% |
| AIG American International Group, Inc. | 12 of 29 | +20.0% | +9.8% | +9.8% | +13.8% | +53.9% | −23.1% | +33.6% | −32.1% | −6.9% | +7.8% | +12.1% | +10.7% | +45.2% | +52.1% | −43.6% | +92.2% | −4.6% | −97.2% | −17.6% | +6.2% | +5.0% | −0.5% | +15.1% | −26.9% | −19.3% | +37.0% | +40.2% | +33.7% | +51.2% |
| MKL Markel Corporation | 13 of 29 | +24.5% | +21.6% | +7.8% | +6.8% | +19.4% | −9.6% | +10.1% | −8.9% | +25.9% | +2.4% | +29.4% | +17.7% | +33.9% | +4.5% | +9.7% | +11.2% | +13.7% | −39.1% | +2.3% | +51.4% | −12.9% | +43.6% | +23.4% | +14.4% | −0.8% | +16.8% | −14.4% | +15.9% | +73.5% |
Risk and diversification
How BRK-A has fallen, how it held up in crashes beside the S&P 500 and its popular alternatives, and what moves independently of it.
What were BRK-A's worst declines?
A drawdown is the decline from a peak to the lowest point before a new high. This section presents BRK-A's five deepest drawdowns since it began trading in 1986, alongside the S&P 500's return over the same dates, and how long each took to recover. Together, these figures show how much an investor could have lost and how long it took to get back to even.
- Not every decline was the market's doing: BRK-A fell 48.9% from June 1998 to March 2000, while the S&P 500 rose 29.6%.
- The slowest recovery came after BRK-A fell 51.5% from December 2007 to March 2009; it did not regain that peak until February 2013, four years later.
- In two of BRK-A's three worst declines, it fell less than the S&P 500 did over the same dates.
Green means BRK-A fell less than the S&P 500 over the same dates. Based on daily closing prices with dividends reinvested.
| During | BRK-A fell | S&P 500, same dates | Peak | Low | Time to the low | Back at the peak | Time to recover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 financial crisis | −51.5% | −53.4% | Dec 2007 | Mar 2009 | 15 months | Feb 2013 | 3.9 years |
| Dot-com bust | −48.9% | +29.6% | Jun 1998 | Mar 2000 | 21 months | Nov 2003 | 3.7 years |
| No named crash | −37.5% | — | Oct 1989 | Oct 1990 | 12 months | Aug 1991 | 10 months |
| No named crash | −37.1% | — | Oct 1987 | Oct 1987 | Under a month | Jul 1988 | 9 months |
| Covid crash | −30.4% | −32.4% | Jan 2020 | Mar 2020 | 2 months | Nov 2020 | 8 months |
How did BRK-A do in stock market crashes?
This section measures how far BRK-A, the S&P 500 and each alternative fell from peak to trough during every major market crash since 2000. A smaller decline means an investment held up better, and comparing results across crashes shows whether that resilience was consistent or a one-off.
- Among its popular alternatives, NEE held up best, falling less than BRK-A in seven of the ten crashes they both traded through.
- BRK-A fell less than the S&P 500 in five of the ten crashes it has traded through. The clearest case was the dot-com bust, when BRK-A fell 21.5% and the S&P 500 fell 47.5%.
Newest crash first. Each figure is the fund's deepest fall within the crash window; green means a smaller fall than BRK-A.
| Investment | Held up better | 2023 regional bank crisisMar 2023 | 2022 bear marketJan 2022 | Covid crashFeb 2020 | Late-2018 sell-offSep 2018 | February 2018 volatility shockFeb 2018 | 2015 China and oil sell-offAug 2015 | 2011 euro debt crisisJul 2011 | 2010 flash crashMay 2010 | 2008 financial crisisOct 2007 | Dot-com bustMar 2000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BRK-A This pageBerkshire Hathaway Inc. | — | −3.0% | −26.0% | −30.2% | −15.8% | −8.4% | −13.1% | −13.6% | −1.8% | −51.5% | −21.5% |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 2 of 10 | −3.4% | −24.5% | −33.7% | −19.3% | −6.5% | −12.8% | −17.9% | −1.5% | −55.2% | −47.5% |
| ALL The Allstate Corporation | 3 of 10 | −6.7% | −20.3% | −40.8% | −23.7% | −8.0% | −10.8% | −20.3% | −0.8% | −74.8% | −30.6% |
| TRV The Travelers Companies, Inc. | 4 of 10 | −2.6% | −18.9% | −39.2% | −15.7% | −8.8% | −11.4% | −18.1% | −1.1% | −43.7% | −55.1% |
| AFG American Financial Group, Inc. | 4 of 10 | −7.4% | −16.2% | −58.2% | −23.5% | −6.6% | −11.8% | −13.8% | −0.5% | −58.7% | −38.0% |
| RNR RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd. | 5 of 10 | −10.2% | −27.1% | −39.6% | −14.1% | −3.1% | −8.5% | −16.1% | −0.7% | −45.2% | −25.1% |
| JPM JPMorgan Chase & Co. | 2 of 10 | −5.4% | −37.9% | −42.5% | −21.3% | −5.6% | −22.0% | −32.1% | −0.1% | −67.7% | −74.0% |
| HIG The Hartford Insurance Group, Inc. | 1 of 10 | −9.0% | −18.6% | −54.5% | −19.4% | −8.1% | −23.3% | −37.2% | −2.9% | −96.0% | −51.5% |
| WRB W. R. Berkley Corporation | 5 of 10 | −7.5% | −14.7% | −45.3% | −12.2% | −7.5% | −17.6% | −15.5% | −0.9% | −42.0% | −25.9% |
| NSC Norfolk Southern Corporation | 1 of 10 | −4.0% | −28.4% | −43.6% | −23.8% | −5.6% | −31.7% | −21.1% | −2.1% | −62.9% | −39.9% |
| CB Chubb Limited | 4 of 10 | −5.6% | −19.1% | −42.2% | −13.6% | −8.4% | −9.7% | −13.7% | −0.2% | −51.2% | −52.4% |
| ACGL Arch Capital Group Ltd. | 5 of 10 | −7.3% | −16.6% | −51.7% | −17.9% | −5.5% | −16.4% | −12.6% | −0.6% | −43.9% | −21.9% |
| L Loews Corporation | 2 of 10 | −5.6% | −26.1% | −44.8% | −17.7% | −9.4% | −12.1% | −18.0% | −1.0% | −64.2% | −45.9% |
| AXS AXIS Capital Holdings Limited | 4 of 9 | −6.4% | −19.0% | −43.6% | −15.5% | −2.5% | −10.7% | −21.5% | −0.9% | −55.9% | — |
| PGR The Progressive Corporation | 5 of 10 | −2.9% | −10.5% | −18.3% | −22.3% | −4.3% | −12.3% | −16.6% | −1.2% | −52.9% | −36.2% |
| UNP Union Pacific Corporation | 1 of 10 | −4.2% | −29.8% | −37.5% | −21.9% | −4.8% | −28.7% | −23.4% | −1.5% | −59.5% | −25.6% |
| CINF Cincinnati Financial Corporation | 2 of 10 | −7.0% | −35.8% | −40.5% | −12.1% | −7.9% | −11.3% | −15.4% | −1.5% | −57.1% | −29.8% |
| BRK-B Berkshire Hathaway Inc. | 2 of 10 | −2.7% | −26.6% | −29.3% | −16.1% | −8.5% | −13.5% | −14.3% | −0.2% | −53.9% | −23.3% |
| NEE NextEra Energy, Inc. | 7 of 10 | −1.7% | −24.0% | −35.6% | −8.2% | −6.9% | −12.9% | −12.8% | 0.0% | −47.9% | −32.2% |
| CNA CNA Financial Corporation | 1 of 10 | −8.7% | −25.7% | −43.3% | −12.3% | −8.9% | −24.6% | −22.7% | −1.8% | −83.9% | −46.2% |
| EG Everest Group, Ltd. | 7 of 10 | −9.4% | −19.0% | −40.4% | −12.0% | −2.8% | −10.3% | −11.9% | 0.0% | −46.7% | −44.7% |
| RLI RLI Corp. | 5 of 10 | −4.3% | −15.7% | −27.0% | −16.9% | −6.1% | −8.2% | −14.7% | −2.2% | −34.8% | −21.3% |
| AIG American International Group, Inc. | 3 of 10 | −12.7% | −25.5% | −61.8% | −32.5% | −7.6% | −21.1% | −30.6% | 0.0% | −99.5% | −50.5% |
| MKL Markel Corporation | 3 of 10 | −6.2% | −28.9% | −44.7% | −21.5% | −5.3% | −13.3% | −13.3% | 0.0% | −61.3% | −19.1% |
How closely does BRK-A move with the S&P 500?
Upside capture measures how much of the S&P 500's gains an investment kept in the months the market rose, and downside capture how much of its losses it took in the months the market fell. An investment that captures more of the gains than the losses has compounded ahead of the market over time. This section compares BRK-A with its popular alternatives on both measures, and on beta (how strongly each has moved with the market), over the past 10 years.
- Over the past 10 years, BRK-A captured 78% of the S&P 500's gains in rising months and 70% of its losses in falling months, with a beta of 0.75. That is a defensive profile: it gave up some of the market's upside in exchange for smaller losses.
- 12 of the 21 popular alternatives had a higher capture ratio (upside capture divided by downside capture) than BRK-A's 1.11, led by WRB, RNR and ALL.
- PGR took just -5% of the S&P 500's losses, against 70% for BRK-A, while still keeping 72% of its gains.
Monthly total returns over the past 10 years, measured against SPY. 100% capture or a beta of 1.00 means moving in line with the S&P 500. Green marks a better figure than BRK-A's: more upside, less downside or a higher capture ratio. Sorted by capture ratio.
| Investment | Upside capture | Downside capture | Capture ratio | Beta |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BRK-A This pageBerkshire Hathaway Inc. | 78% | 70% | 1.11 | 0.75 |
| WRB W. R. Berkley Corporation | 68% | 26% | 2.58 | 0.55 |
| RNR RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd. | 46% | 20% | 2.26 | 0.31 |
| ALL The Allstate Corporation | 68% | 41% | 1.66 | 0.49 |
| TRV The Travelers Companies, Inc. | 70% | 48% | 1.48 | 0.59 |
| EG Everest Group, Ltd. | 46% | 32% | 1.43 | 0.46 |
| NEE NextEra Energy, Inc. | 62% | 44% | 1.40 | 0.45 |
| CB Chubb Limited | 63% | 48% | 1.32 | 0.54 |
| ACGL Arch Capital Group Ltd. | 74% | 57% | 1.28 | 0.57 |
| CNA CNA Financial Corporation | 57% | 45% | 1.26 | 0.54 |
| JPM JPMorgan Chase & Co. | 117% | 103% | 1.14 | 1.09 |
| AFG American Financial Group, Inc. | 84% | 75% | 1.12 | 0.78 |
| BRK-B Berkshire Hathaway Inc. | 78% | 69% | 1.12 | 0.74 |
| HIG The Hartford Insurance Group, Inc. | 83% | 77% | 1.07 | 0.78 |
| CINF Cincinnati Financial Corporation | 66% | 63% | 1.05 | 0.60 |
| RLI RLI Corp. | 57% | 54% | 1.05 | 0.39 |
| AXS AXIS Capital Holdings Limited | 55% | 53% | 1.04 | 0.67 |
| L Loews Corporation | 66% | 64% | 1.03 | 0.71 |
| UNP Union Pacific Corporation | 104% | 119% | 0.87 | 1.05 |
| NSC Norfolk Southern Corporation | 123% | 147% | 0.84 | 1.30 |
| MKL Markel Corporation | 65% | 88% | 0.75 | 0.68 |
| AIG American International Group, Inc. | 64% | 93% | 0.68 | 0.91 |
| PGR The Progressive Corporation | 72% | -5% | — | 0.36 |
What diversifies BRK-A?
Correlation measures how closely two investments move together, on a scale from 1 (in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to -1 (in opposite directions). This section lists large ETFs and stocks whose returns have had a low correlation with BRK-A's. Because such investments tend not to fall at the same time, pairing BRK-A with them can reduce a portfolio's overall swings.
- Moving a fifth of the money in BRK-A into GLD would have cut the portfolio's volatility by 16% over the past 5 years and raised its annual return (+12.7% for BRK-A alone, +14.3% for the mix).
- Among large ETFs, DXJ, EWP and SMH have moved largely independently of BRK-A over the past 5 years, with correlations of 0.49 or lower, and each still earned a positive 5-year return.
- Among large stocks, CAH, CLS and FIX have moved largely independently of BRK-A over the past 5 years, with correlations of 0.40 or lower, and each still earned a positive 5-year return.
Only ETFs with at least $1.0B in assets and stocks worth at least $10B, with a correlation below 0.5 over the past 5 years and a positive return, are included, ranked by Sharpe ratio; funds that hold the same thing are shown once. The year columns are the years in which BRK-A lost money. The last two columns show a portfolio that is 80% BRK-A and 20% the other investment, rebalanced monthly.
ETFs
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2015 | 2011 | 2008 | 2002 | 1999 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BRK-A Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (this page) | 1.00 | +87.2% | 0.82 | −12.5% | −4.7% | −31.8% | −3.8% | −19.9% | 18.6% | +12.7% |
| DXJ InternationalWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund | 0.33 | +225% | 1.34 | +7.7% | −16.1% | −20.8% | — | — | 15.9% | +15.7% |
| EWP Broad MarketiShares MSCI Spain ETF | 0.49 | +140% | 0.97 | −15.6% | −9.8% | −36.8% | −13.6% | −1.5% | 17.1% | +14.6% |
| SMH TechnologyVanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.15 | +323% | 0.97 | −0.3% | +6.8% | −44.7% | −47.0% | — | 17.3% | +18.4% |
| GLD CommoditiesSPDR Gold Shares | 0.12 | +126% | 0.96 | −10.7% | +9.6% | +4.9% | — | — | 15.7% | +14.3% |
| SPMO Broad MarketInvesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 0.39 | +136% | 0.93 | — | — | — | — | — | 16.9% | +14.8% |
| XLE EnergyState Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | 0.44 | +177% | 0.93 | −21.5% | +2.8% | −39.0% | −14.8% | +18.1% | 17.8% | +15.2% |
| VLUE Broad MarketiShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF | 0.41 | +109% | 0.90 | −4.1% | — | — | — | — | 17.0% | +14.0% |
| EWT TechnologyiShares MSCI Taiwan ETF | 0.11 | +153% | 0.89 | −12.9% | −21.8% | −45.3% | −24.4% | — | 16.3% | +15.2% |
Stocks
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2015 | 2011 | 2008 | 2002 | 1999 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BRK-A Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (this page) | 1.00 | +87.2% | 0.82 | −12.5% | −4.7% | −31.8% | −3.8% | −19.9% | 18.6% | +12.7% |
| CAH Medical - DistributionCardinal Health, Inc. | 0.40 | +479% | 1.55 | +12.6% | +8.1% | −39.6% | −8.3% | −36.8% | 17.7% | +17.9% |
| CLS Hardware, Equipment & PartsCelestica Inc. | 0.03 | +3,143% | 1.47 | −6.0% | −24.4% | −20.5% | −65.1% | +350% | 19.2% | +31.2% |
| FIX Engineering & ConstructionComfort Systems USA, Inc. | 0.23 | +1,636% | 1.46 | +67.7% | −17.0% | −15.2% | −9.4% | −58.7% | 19.1% | +26.8% |
| MCK Medical - DistributionMcKesson Corporation | 0.42 | +413% | 1.44 | −4.5% | +11.8% | −40.4% | −27.2% | −71.3% | 17.6% | +17.3% |
| MPC Oil & Gas Refining & MarketingMarathon Petroleum Corporation | 0.30 | +690% | 1.41 | +17.4% | — | — | — | — | 18.0% | +20.0% |
Common questions
What was BRK-A's worst drawdown?
BRK-A's deepest decline since it began trading in 1986 was 51.5%, from December 2007 to March 2009. It took about four years from the low to climb back to its old high.
What were BRK-A's best and worst years?
Over 29 full calendar years, BRK-A's best year was 1998, when it returned 52.2%. Its worst was 2008, with a return of -31.8%.
Is there a better investment than BRK-A?
Among BRK-A's popular alternatives, TRV, ALL and AFG were ahead of BRK-A in most short and long periods, though with much bigger swings (22.3%, 26.2% and 22.6% volatility against 17.2%). Looking beyond its popular alternatives, MFC (life insurance) and AIZ (property & casualty insurance) were ahead of BRK-A in most short and long periods, though with much bigger swings (24.0% and 25.3% volatility against 17.2%).
Is BRK-A more volatile than the S&P 500?
Yes. BRK-A's volatility over the past 5 years was 17.2%, 1.0 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, BRK-A's return lands within 17.2% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump.
What is BRK-A's Sharpe ratio?
BRK-A's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.82, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so BRK-A earned more for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings.
How correlated is BRK-A with the S&P 500?
Over the past 5 years, BRK-A's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.50 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They often move together: some diversification next to an index fund, but not a cushion. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against BRK-A instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a BRK-A holding.
What are the best alternatives to BRK-A?
Of the 23 popular alternatives we compared, four outperformed BRK-A in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes, with dividends reinvested: ALL, TRV and AFG.
Did BRK-A outperform the S&P 500?
BRK-A finished ahead of the S&P 500 (SPY) in 14 of 29 full calendar years. In 2025, it returned +10.9%, against +17.7% for the index.
How did BRK-A do in stock market crashes?
BRK-A fell less than the S&P 500 (SPY) in five of the ten major crashes it has traded through, and further in two. The clearest case was the dot-com bust, when BRK-A fell 21.5% and the S&P 500 fell 47.5%.
What diversifies BRK-A?
These had a low correlation with BRK-A over the past 5 years and still earned a positive 5-year return: among large ETFs, DXJ (correlation 0.33), EWP (correlation 0.49) and SMH (correlation 0.15); among large stocks, CAH (correlation 0.40), CLS (correlation 0.03) and FIX (correlation 0.23). A correlation near zero means the two have moved largely independently.
How we measure
- Short-term periods are 1M, 3M, 6M, YTD, 1Y; long-term periods are 3Y, 5Y, 10Y. An investment outperformed in a period when its total return, with dividends reinvested, was higher than BRK-A's. Returns within 0.5 points or 3% of BRK-A's, whichever is larger, count as a tie.
- "Qualified" means outperforming in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods. "All-weather" means outperforming in every long-term period and all but one short-term period.
- Popular alternatives are the funds and stocks most often compared with this one. We include only those that trade today, are not leveraged or inverse, and hold at least $200 million.
- Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily returns over 5 years, a measure of how much the price typically swings in a year. The Sharpe ratio is the return above cash for each unit of that volatility.
- A decline, or drawdown, runs from a peak to the lowest close before the next high. The worst decline ever uses all the price history we have; comparisons between funds use the past 10 years so that younger funds are judged on the same stretch.
- Sector overlap is the share of assets two funds hold in the same sectors. Correlation and the mixed-portfolio figures use monthly returns.
- Upside and downside capture follow Morningstar's definition: the compound monthly return in the months the S&P 500 rose (or fell), divided by the S&P 500's compound return in those months. Beta measures how strongly monthly returns have moved with the S&P 500. All three use the same window for every investment.
- Figures are computed from daily adjusted prices and update after each trading day. Past performance does not predict future results.
More research
Popular alternatives to BRK-A
ALLAllstate
TRVTravelers Companies
JPMJPMorgan Chase & Co.
NSCNorfolk Southern
SPYState Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF
CBChubb
PGRProgressive
UNPUnion Pacific
BRK-BBerkshire Hathaway
NEENextEra Energy
AIGAmerican International Group