Relative Intelligence · Total Bond Market

How iShares Core Universal USD Bond ETF (IUSB) compares with the whole market and its popular alternatives
Built by QuantCommons' quantitative engine, this page is about relative opportunity, not data on IUSB alone. It places IUSB (iShares Core Universal USD Bond ETF) against 20+ popular alternatives, its neighboring categories and the entire market of over 10,000 U.S.-listed stocks and ETFs, and surfaces what has done better on consistent outperformance, return for the risk taken, behavior in real market crashes and diversification. The result is a clearer view of where IUSB stands in the market, and of the alternatives worth a closer look.
Period covered: IUSB's full trading record, from June 2014 through September 2026. The crash tests reach back to 2000 using older funds and the S&P 500. All returns include reinvested dividends. Data as of October 20, 2026.
Data as of October 20, 2026. Full tables and charts read best on a larger screen.
On this page12 sections
Key findings
- Right nowIUSB has gone against the market, falling 2.4% over the past 6 months while the S&P 500 rose 9.1%. On the flip side, both IUSB and the S&P 500 are within a few percent of a record high. At a glance ↓
- Fund or market?A move of its own: IUSB fell 1.7% over the past 3 months, while the S&P 500 rose 3.9%.
- Long termOver the past decade, IUSB returned 1.6% a year against 15.5% a year for the S&P 500 (16.9% in total against 321%). IUSB's 10-year return of 16.9% puts it behind 91% of the ETFs with at least $100 million in assets with that much history. The S&P 500 returned 321%. Growth of $10,000 ↓
- In a crashAcross four sell-offs, IUSB has typically lost about 27% as much as the S&P 500. The 2022 bear market took 14.8% off IUSB, against 24.5% for the S&P 500. That was more than TOTL (State Street DoubleLine Total Return Tactical ETF, 13.2%) but less than VCIT (Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF, 17.4%). Crash tests ↓
- DiversificationAgainst the S&P 500, IUSB has a correlation of 0.64 over 5 years, less closely than 68% of ETFs with at least $100 million in assets. Next to an index fund it is some diversification, but not a hedge. IUSB cushions stocks less than it used to: its correlation with the S&P 500 rose to 0.64 over the past 5 years, from 0.21 in the 5 years before. Market capture ↓
- Better options
- Popular alternatives
- HYG (iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF) was ahead of IUSB in most short and long periods, though with much bigger swings (7.5% volatility against 5.9%).
- Nearby categories and themes
- BIL (State Street SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF, treasury bonds) and VTIP (Vanguard Short-Term Inflation-Protected Securities ETF, treasury bonds) earned more than IUSB with less volatility over the past 5 years. BIL returned 3.7% a year at 0.3% volatility, against 0.0% a year at 5.9%.
- Whole market
- 82 of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than IUSB with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them SGOV (iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF), VTIP (Vanguard Short-Term Inflation-Protected Securities ETF) and BSV (Vanguard Short-Term Bond ETF).
How much would $10,000 in IUSB have grown?
This chart tracks a hypothetical $10,000 investment in IUSB over the past 12 years, with dividends reinvested, alongside the same amount in the S&P 500, investments that ended ahead of IUSB over the same span and IUSB's popular alternatives, among those that traded for the entire period. A second view covers the past 5 years, the period the better options further down the page are judged on. It shows not only where each investment ended up but also how smooth or uneven the path was.
Note: IUSB began trading on June 12, 2014, so the chart cannot reach back to the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or two other sell-offs. It covers the most recent 12 years of IUSB's record, starting at the end of September 2014.
- $10,000 invested in IUSB at the end of September 2014 would have grown to $12,555 by September 2026, less than the $47,240 it would have become in SPY, an S&P 500 fund.
- All eight other investments on the chart ended ahead of IUSB, and HYG finished highest, at $15,928.
Choose a period
From the end of September 2014 to the end of September 2026. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 2,008 of the 2,461 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of IUSB; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- SPY (S&P 500)$47,240+372% total · +13.8% a year
- HYG$15,928+59.3% total · +4.0% a year
- JNK$15,554+55.5% total · +3.7% a year
- EMB$14,229+42.3% total · +3.0% a year
- VCIT$13,939+39.4% total · +2.8% a year
- IGIB$13,622+36.2% total · +2.6% a year
- USIG$13,342+33.4% total · +2.4% a year
- SPBO$13,325+33.3% total · +2.4% a year
- LQD$13,183+31.8% total · +2.3% a year
- IUSB$12,555+25.6% total · +1.9% a year
From the end of September 2021 to the end of September 2026. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 2,552 of the 3,628 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of IUSB; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- SPY (S&P 500)$19,000+90.0% total · +13.7% a year
- BIL$11,965+19.6% total · +3.7% a year
- HYG$11,691+16.9% total · +3.2% a year
- JNK$11,612+16.1% total · +3.0% a year
- SPSB$11,418+14.2% total · +2.7% a year
- FALN$11,387+13.9% total · +2.6% a year
- VTIP$11,376+13.8% total · +2.6% a year
- EMB$10,558+5.6% total · +1.1% a year
- VCIT$10,131+1.3% total · +0.3% a year
- IUSB$9,868−1.3% total · −0.3% a year
IUSB at a glance
This section summarizes the key facts about the fund, its returns over periods from one to ten years and the risk it has carried, with dividends reinvested throughout. These figures serve as the baseline for every comparison that follows.
Note: IUSB began trading on June 12, 2014, so every figure here, including its worst decline, covers only the time since then. None of them reflect the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or two other sell-offs.
- IUSB's deepest decline since it began trading in 2014 was 17.9%, from December 2020 to October 2022. It took about three years from the low to climb back to its old high.
- Over 11 full calendar years, IUSB's best was 2019, when it returned 9.1%, and its worst was 2022, when it lost 13.0%. It lost money in three of those years.
- IUSB is 3.2% below its all-time high.
The fund
- Issuer
- IShares
- Began trading
- June 2014
- Expense ratio
- 0.06%per year
- Assets
- $49B
- Category
- Bonds
Returns
- Past 1 year
- −1.6%total return
- Past 3 years
- +17.5%+5.5% a year
- Past 5 years
- +0.2%0.0% a year
- Past 10 years
- +16.9%+1.6% a year
- Best calendar year
- +9.1%2019
- Worst calendar year
- −13.0%2022
- Losing years
- 3 of 11full calendar years
Risk
- Volatility
- 5.9%typical yearly swing, 5 years
- Sharpe ratio
- 0.04return per unit of risk, 5 years
- Worst decline ever
- −17.9%Dec 2020 to Oct 2022
- From its all-time high
- −3.2%below the peak
IUSB against the whole market
Where IUSB ranks among every stock and fund, and what across the market has done better.
How does IUSB rank among all ETFs?
This section ranks IUSB on return, volatility, risk-adjusted return and worst decline against every ETF worth at least $100 million with enough history. Where the comparisons with its popular alternatives show how IUSB stacks up against its peers, these rankings show where it stands in the market as a whole.
- IUSB's worst decline of the past 10 years ranks in the top 9% of the 951 ETFs with at least $100 million in assets, where the top fell the least.
- IUSB's 10-year return ranks in the bottom 10% of the 958 ETFs with at least $100 million in assets with 10 years of history.
Ranked against U.S.-listed ETFs with at least $100M in assets that have enough history for each measure, so the count changes from row to row; smaller ETFs and leveraged funds are left out. Lower volatility and smaller declines rank higher.
| Measure | IUSB | Rank | Standing |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | −1.6% | 2,101 of 2,485 | bottom 16% |
| 3-year return | +17.5% | 1,657 of 1,949 | bottom 16% |
| 5-year return | +0.2% | 1,369 of 1,560 | bottom 13% |
| 10-year return | +16.9% | 867 of 958 | bottom 10% |
| Volatility, 5 years | 5.9% | 172 of 1,560 | top 11% |
| Sharpe ratio, 5 years | 0.04 | 1,394 of 1,560 | bottom 12% |
| Worst decline, past 10 years | −17.9% | 84 of 951 | top 9% |
What has beaten IUSB on both return and risk?
Each dot is an investment, placed by how much it earned a year over the past 5 years (higher is better) and how much its price swung, its volatility (further left is calmer). IUSB sits where the dashed lines cross. Anything in the green box above and to the left earned more than IUSB with smaller swings, a better trade-off over this period on both counts. Past results are no promise, but a name in the box is worth a closer look.
- 82 ETFs worth at least $500 million sit in the green region: each earned more than IUSB over the past 5 years with smaller price swings. That is 2% of the 3,633 screened.
- Among those with at least half IUSB's swings, BALT has the best return for its risk: 6.3% a year at 3.3% volatility, 43% less than IUSB's 5.9%, and a Sharpe ratio (return above cash per unit of volatility) of 1.85 against 0.04 for IUSB.
- None of IUSB's popular alternatives made it, but BIL (treasury bonds) did: 3.7% a year at 0.3% volatility, 96% less than IUSB's 5.9%.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested, and volatility the annualized swing in daily prices, both over 5 years. Labeled dots are the strongest picks from the table below and the names called out above, colored by how close they sit to IUSB; faint dots are 22 more of the 82 in the green region (the strongest, one per fund family). 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million were screened. Hover over a dot for its figures.
- Popular alternatives
- Same and neighboring categories, and shared themes
- The whole market
- Others in the green region
- 1 with more than 1.6× IUSB's volatility is in the table only
Is there a better investment than IUSB?
Investments that beat IUSB over the past 5 years on return, volatility, drawdowns, consistency, crash losses or fees, from its popular alternatives out to the whole market.
- Among IUSB's popular alternatives, HYG was ahead of IUSB in most short and long periods, though with much bigger swings (7.5% volatility against 5.9%).
- VCIT tracks the same thing for 0.03% a year against IUSB's 0.06%, and has kept pace over the past decade: about $30 less in fees on $10,000 over 10 years.
- Looking beyond its popular alternatives, BIL (treasury bonds) and VTIP (treasury bonds) earned more than IUSB with less volatility over the past 5 years. BIL returned 3.7% a year at 0.3% volatility, against 0.0% a year at 5.9%.
How this works
The table below lists investments that beat IUSB over the past 5 years on at least one of these measures: a higher annual return with lower volatility, a higher annual return at similar volatility, a similar return with lower volatility, a higher Sharpe ratio with a smaller worst decline, a higher total return in most periods from 3 months to 10 years, or smaller losses in recent market crashes, and, for funds, the same exposure at a lower expense ratio. It checks IUSB's popular alternatives first, then the rest of its own and neighboring categories, then every stock and fund worth at least $500 million, and shows the strongest few in each group. The full list of those with a higher return and lower volatility than IUSB follows the table.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested. Annual return, volatility and the Sharpe ratio cover 5 years; the worst decline covers the past 10 years. Green marks a better figure than IUSB's. "On the frontier" means no other option shown or tested earned more with less volatility. Funds that hold the same thing are shown once. Beyond the popular alternatives, nothing with more than 1.5× IUSB's volatility counts as better.
These figures cover the past 5 years. Green marks a better figure than IUSB's.
| Investment | Why it is better | Past 5 years | Downside | Long run | Fit | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Annual return?higher is better | Volatility?lower is calmer | Sharpe?return per unit of risk | Worst decline?past 10 years | 10Y returntotal | Corr. with IUSB?lower diversifies more | Expenseper year | |||
| 0.0% | 5.9% | 0.04 | −17.9% | +16.9% | 1.00 | 0.06% | |||
| +12.7% | 17.1% | 0.79 | −33.7% | +321% | 0.64 | 0.09% | |||
| Popular alternativesbest 2 shownThe investments people most often weigh against IUSB. 6 of 23 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
HYGiShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF · High Yield Bonds | Higher return in most periods | +3.1% | 7.5% | 0.45 | −22.0% | +49.5% | 0.81 | 0.49% | |
| Same exposure, lower expense ratio | +0.6% | 6.7% | 0.13 | −20.6% | +26.4% | 0.99 | 0.03% | ||
| Same and neighboring categories, and shared themesbest 5 shownEverything else in Total Bond Market and the categories next to it (Investment Grade Bonds, Core Plus Bonds, Treasury Bonds, High Yield Bonds), plus IUSB's specific themes. 22 of 38 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| On the frontierHigher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +3.7% | 0.3% | 14.05 | −0.2% | +25.8% | 0.28 | 0.14% | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +2.7% | 2.9% | 0.94 | −6.3% | +32.7% | 0.71 | 0.03% | ||
SPSBState Street SPDR Portfolio Short Term Corporate Bond ETF · Investment Grade Bonds | Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +2.8% | 2.0% | 1.38 | −11.8% | +29.2% | 0.92 | 0.04% | |
SHYiShares 1-3 Year Treasury Bond ETF · Treasury Bonds | Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +1.8% | 2.0% | 0.89 | −5.7% | +17.7% | 0.85 | 0.15% | |
BSCRInvesco BulletShares 2027 Corporate Bond ETF · Investment Grade Bonds | Higher return, lower volatilityHigher return in most periods | +1.7% | 4.1% | 0.44 | −17.3% | — | 0.91 | 0.10% | |
| The whole marketbest 6 shownEvery other stock and fund worth at least $500 million. 124 of 3,572 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
JAAAJanus Henderson AAA CLO ETF · CLO Bonds | On the frontierHigher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +5.1% | 1.7% | 2.98 | −2.6% | — | 0.30 | 0.20% | |
BALTInnovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF · Crypto | On the frontierHigher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +6.3% | 3.3% | 1.85 | −4.9% | — | 0.63 | 0.69% | |
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +1.7% | 2.8% | 0.63 | −8.5% | +20.5% | 0.92 | 0.03% | ||
USTBVictoryShares Short-Term Bond ETF · Bonds | Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +3.6% | 2.0% | 1.73 | −5.3% | — | 0.89 | 0.34% | |
IBHFiShares iBonds 2026 Term High Yield and Income ETF · Bonds | Higher return, similar volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +4.0% | 5.8% | 0.71 | −11.2% | — | 0.72 | 0.35% | |
JMUBJPMorgan Municipal ETF · Municipal Bonds | Similar return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +0.6% | 3.5% | 0.20 | −12.5% | — | 0.91 | 0.18% | |
What these numbers mean for IUSB
- Annual return
- IUSB returned 0.0% a year over the past 5 years with dividends reinvested, against 12.7% a year for the S&P 500. At that pace, $10,000 became about $10,000. Annual return is the steady yearly rate that would produce the same total result, so investments held over the same span compare fairly. Guide: What is performance and return? →
- Volatility
- IUSB's volatility over the past 5 years was 5.9%, 34% of the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, IUSB's return lands within 5.9% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump. Guide: Understanding and measuring risk (volatility) →
- Sharpe ratio
- IUSB's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.04, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so IUSB earned less for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings. Guide: Balancing reward with risk (Sharpe ratio) →
- Worst decline
- IUSB's worst fall from a peak to a low over the past 10 years was 17.9%, against 33.7% for the S&P 500. Losses and gains are not symmetric: climbing back from a 17.9% fall takes a 21.8% gain. Guide: Market crash risk and tail risk →
- Correlation
- Over the past 5 years, IUSB's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.64 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They often move together: some diversification next to an index fund, but not a cushion. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against IUSB instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a IUSB holding. Guide: Correlation and diversification →
Show all 82 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that earned more than IUSB with less volatility
Out of 3,633 tested over 5 years. The strongest 31 are listed, best first, with funds that hold the same thing listed once.
| # | Investment | Found in | Annual return | Volatility | Sharpe | Worst decline | 10Y return | Corr. with IUSB | Expense |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Same or nearby category | +3.7% | 0.3% | 14.05 | −0.2% | +25.8% | 0.28 | 0.14% | |
| 2 | JAAAJanus Henderson AAA CLO ETF · CLO Bonds | Whole market | +5.1% | 1.7% | 2.98 | −2.6% | — | 0.30 | 0.20% |
| 3 | BALTInnovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF · Crypto | Whole market | +6.3% | 3.3% | 1.85 | −4.9% | — | 0.63 | 0.69% |
| 4 | Whole market | +1.7% | 2.8% | 0.63 | −8.5% | +20.5% | 0.92 | 0.03% | |
| 5 | USTBVictoryShares Short-Term Bond ETF · Bonds | Whole market | +3.6% | 2.0% | 1.73 | −5.3% | — | 0.89 | 0.34% |
| 6 | RAVINorthern Trust Ultra-Short Fixed Income ETF · Bonds | Whole market | +3.8% | 1.4% | 2.61 | −3.7% | +30.8% | 0.55 | 0.26% |
| 7 | MEARiShares Short Maturity Municipal Bond Active ETF · Bonds | Whole market | +2.4% | 1.0% | 2.37 | −2.7% | +19.3% | 0.75 | 0.26% |
| 8 | LMBSFirst Trust Low Duration Opportunities ETF · Mortgage-Backed Securities | Whole market | +3.0% | 2.6% | 1.14 | −6.5% | +25.6% | 0.89 | 0.66% |
| 9 | Same or nearby category | +2.7% | 2.9% | 0.94 | −6.3% | +32.7% | 0.71 | 0.03% | |
| 10 | SPSBState Street SPDR Portfolio Short Term Corporate Bond ETF · Investment Grade Bonds | Same or nearby category | +2.8% | 2.0% | 1.38 | −11.8% | +29.2% | 0.92 | 0.04% |
| 11 | SHYiShares 1-3 Year Treasury Bond ETF · Treasury Bonds | Same or nearby category | +1.8% | 2.0% | 0.89 | −5.7% | +17.7% | 0.85 | 0.15% |
| 12 | LDURPIMCO Enhanced Low Duration Active Exchange-Traded Fund · Bonds | Whole market | +2.4% | 2.1% | 1.13 | −8.7% | +26.7% | 0.78 | 0.54% |
| 13 | STOTState Street DoubleLine Short Duration Total Return Tactical ETF · Bonds | Whole market | +2.9% | 1.7% | 1.65 | −6.1% | +26.0% | 0.82 | 0.45% |
| 14 | VRIGInvesco Variable Rate Investment Grade ETF · Bonds | Whole market | +4.7% | 1.3% | 3.51 | −13.1% | +40.5% | 0.29 | 0.30% |
| 15 | FLRTPacer Aristotle Pacific Floating Rate High Income ETF · Financials | Whole market | +6.0% | 2.3% | 2.55 | −21.0% | +58.0% | 0.44 | 0.60% |
| 16 | FLOTiShares Floating Rate Bond ETF · Floating Rate Bonds | Whole market | +4.5% | 1.8% | 2.48 | −13.5% | +35.9% | 0.24 | 0.15% |
| 17 | FLTRVanEck IG Floating Rate ETF · Multi-Asset | Whole market | +4.8% | 2.1% | 2.20 | −17.8% | +41.8% | 0.20 | 0.14% |
| 18 | BKLNInvesco Senior Loan ETF · Bank Loans | Whole market | +5.4% | 4.5% | 1.19 | −24.1% | +50.7% | 0.40 | 0.67% |
| 19 | SRLNState Street Blackstone Senior Loan ETF · Bank Loans | Whole market | +4.7% | 3.9% | 1.18 | −22.3% | +54.2% | 0.38 | 0.70% |
| 20 | FTSLFirst Trust Senior Loan Fund · Bonds | Whole market | +5.0% | 3.4% | 1.49 | −22.7% | +52.1% | 0.37 | 0.70% |
| 21 | VNLAJanus Henderson Short Duration Income ETF · Bonds | Whole market | +4.0% | 1.1% | 3.77 | −4.5% | — | 0.69 | 0.25% |
| 22 | IAGGiShares Core International Aggregate Bond ETF · International Bonds | Whole market | +1.1% | 4.5% | 0.27 | −13.9% | +20.8% | 0.87 | 0.07% |
| 23 | FLDRFidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF · Bonds | Whole market | +3.9% | 1.2% | 3.09 | −12.2% | — | 0.83 | 0.15% |
| 24 | TBUXT. Rowe Price Ultra Short-Term Bond ETF · Bonds | Whole market | +4.1% | 1.1% | 3.85 | −1.8% | — | 0.67 | 0.17% |
| 25 | SUBiShares Short-Term National Muni Bond ETF · Municipal Bonds | Whole market | +1.4% | 1.7% | 0.85 | −9.4% | +15.6% | 0.83 | 0.07% |
| 26 | FLBLFranklin Senior Loan ETF · Bonds | Whole market | +5.2% | 3.9% | 1.35 | −19.5% | — | 0.39 | 0.45% |
| 27 | JPIBJPMorgan International Bond Opportunities ETF · Bonds | Whole market | +2.5% | 4.2% | 0.62 | −13.1% | — | 0.89 | 0.50% |
| 28 | PREFPrincipal Spectrum Preferred Securities Active ETF · Bonds | Whole market | +2.5% | 4.9% | 0.52 | −23.0% | — | 0.75 | 0.55% |
| 29 | BSCRInvesco BulletShares 2027 Corporate Bond ETF · Investment Grade Bonds | Same or nearby category | +1.7% | 4.1% | 0.44 | −17.3% | — | 0.91 | 0.10% |
| 30 | NFLTVirtus Newfleet Multi-Sector Bond ETF · Bonds | Whole market | +2.7% | 4.6% | 0.61 | −15.1% | +41.0% | 0.91 | 0.50% |
| 31 | KORPAmerican Century Diversified Corporate Bond ETF · Bonds | Whole market | +1.3% | 5.5% | 0.26 | −14.9% | — | 0.98 | 0.29% |
IUSB against its popular alternatives
The investments people most often weigh against IUSB, compared period by period and year by year.
How do IUSB's risk and return compare with its alternatives?
This map plots each investment's annual return over the past 5 years against its volatility, the size of its typical price swings. Investments toward the upper left earned more for a smoother ride, and those toward the lower right earned less for a rougher one. The dashed lines cross at IUSB, which divides the map into what did better or worse on each measure.
- JCPB, BNDX and TOTL were both more rewarding and calmer than IUSB over the past 5 years, earning a higher annual return with lower volatility.
- Over the past 5 years, IUSB returned 0.1% a year, less than the S&P 500's 12.7%, with lower volatility (5.9% against 17.1%).
Green points earned more than IUSB with less volatility; red points earned less with more. Hover over a point for its figures. Total returns with dividends reinvested, annualized.
All figures
| Investment | Annual return | Volatility |
|---|---|---|
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | +12.7% | 17.1% |
| HYG iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | +3.1% | 7.5% |
| JNK State Street SPDR Bloomberg High Yield Bond ETF | +3.0% | 7.6% |
| FALN iShares Fallen Angels USD Bond ETF | +2.6% | 7.3% |
| EMB iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF | +1.3% | 9.8% |
| IGIB iShares 5-10 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF | +0.8% | 6.6% |
| VCIT Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF | +0.6% | 6.7% |
| JCPB JPMorgan Core Plus Bond ETF | +0.6% | 5.4% |
| FBND Fidelity Total Bond ETF | +0.3% | 6.0% |
| BNDX Vanguard Total International Bond ETF | +0.2% | 4.9% |
| TOTL State Street DoubleLine Total Return Tactical ETF | +0.1% | 5.7% |
| SPBO State Street SPDR Portfolio Corporate Bond ETF | +0.1% | 7.2% |
| USIG iShares Broad USD Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF | +0.1% | 6.8% |
| IUSB This pageiShares Core Universal USD Bond ETF | +0.1% | 5.9% |
| BOND PIMCO Active Bond Exchange-Traded Fund | −0.1% | 5.9% |
| TIP iShares TIPS Bond ETF | −0.1% | 6.2% |
| MBB iShares MBS ETF | −0.2% | 7.0% |
| AGG iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF | −0.3% | 6.1% |
| SCHZ Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF | −0.3% | 6.1% |
| GTO Invesco Total Return Bond ETF | −0.4% | 5.7% |
| GOVT iShares U.S. Treasury Bond ETF | −0.7% | 6.0% |
| LQD iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF | −0.9% | 8.7% |
Has IUSB consistently beaten its popular alternatives?
This section compares IUSB with the investments people most often weigh against it, checking each one over eight periods from one month to ten years. Counting how often an alternative earned more than IUSB helps separate lasting outperformance from a single strong stretch.
- Two of the 25 popular alternatives, JNK and HYG, outperformed IUSB in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes.
- JCPB, FBND and BNDX earned more for the risk they took than IUSB (a higher Sharpe ratio) and fell less in their worst decline of the past 10 years.
- VCIT outperformed IUSB over all three long-term periods but in none of the five short-term ones, so IUSB has had the better of it lately.
A green cell means the alternative earned more than IUSB over that period. "Qualified" marks those that did so in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods.
| Investment | Periods outperformed | Short term | Long term | Risk · 5 years | Fund | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1M | 3M | 6M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | 10Y | Volatilitylower is calmer | Sharpehigher is better | Worst declinepast 10 years | Expense | Assets | Overlapsame sectors | ||
| IUSB iShares Core Universal USD Bond ETF (this page) | — | −0.7% | −1.7% | −2.4% | −1.5% | −1.6% | +17.5% | +0.2% | +16.9% | 5.9% | 0.04 | −17.9% | 0.06% | $49B | — |
| JNK QualifiedState Street SPDR Bloomberg High Yield Bond ETF | 3/5 short3/3 long | −2.0% | −2.2% | −1.7% | −0.3% | +1.1% | +27.8% | +16.1% | +49.7% | 7.6% | 0.43 | −22.9% | 0.40% | $5.7B | — |
| HYG QualifiediShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 3/5 short3/3 long | −1.9% | −2.1% | −1.8% | −0.4% | +0.7% | +27.5% | +16.8% | +49.5% | 7.5% | 0.45 | −22.0% | 0.49% | $17B | — |
| EMB BondsiShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF | 1/5 short3/3 long | −2.3% | −3.5% | −3.5% | −1.9% | −0.6% | +32.6% | +6.7% | +26.4% | 9.8% | 0.18 | −28.7% | 0.39% | $13B | — |
| FALN BondsiShares Fallen Angels USD Bond ETF | 0/5 short3/3 long | −3.0% | −4.3% | −3.4% | −2.1% | −1.3% | +27.4% | +13.5% | +65.5% | 7.3% | 0.38 | −29.2% | 0.25% | $1.6B | — |
| IGIB BondsiShares 5-10 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF | 0/5 short3/3 long | −1.0% | −2.8% | −3.7% | −2.8% | −2.7% | +21.9% | +3.9% | +28.8% | 6.6% | 0.15 | −20.6% | 0.04% | $19B | — |
| VCIT BondsVanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF | 0/5 short3/3 long | −1.0% | −2.7% | −3.6% | −2.8% | −2.6% | +21.5% | +3.2% | +26.4% | 6.7% | 0.13 | −20.6% | 0.03% | $69B | — |
| GTO BondsInvesco Total Return Bond ETF | 0/5 short2/3 long | −1.0% | −2.1% | −2.8% | −1.7% | −1.7% | +18.3% | −2.1% | +25.8% | 5.7% | -0.05 | −20.6% | 0.35% | $2.5B | — |
| SPBO BondsState Street SPDR Portfolio Corporate Bond ETF | 0/5 short2/3 long | −1.0% | −1.9% | −2.8% | −1.7% | −2.2% | +20.5% | +0.4% | +25.1% | 7.2% | 0.05 | −22.0% | 0.03% | $2.1B | — |
| USIG BondsiShares Broad USD Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF | 0/5 short2/3 long | −0.9% | −2.2% | −3.0% | −2.1% | −2.5% | +19.7% | +0.3% | +23.5% | 6.8% | 0.04 | −21.4% | 0.04% | $18B | — |
| FBND IndustrialsFidelity Total Bond ETF | 0/5 short2/3 long | −0.9% | −2.0% | −2.8% | −1.7% | −1.9% | +17.8% | +1.5% | +21.9% | 6.0% | 0.08 | −17.3% | 0.36% | $28B | — |
| LQD BondsiShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF | 0/5 short2/3 long | −1.4% | −2.4% | −3.9% | −2.9% | −3.9% | +19.7% | −4.3% | +20.5% | 8.7% | -0.06 | −25.0% | 0.14% | $29B | — |
| BOND BondsPIMCO Active Bond Exchange-Traded Fund | 0/5 short2/3 long | −0.9% | −2.4% | −3.1% | −1.9% | −1.9% | +19.5% | −0.3% | +19.3% | 5.9% | 0.02 | −19.7% | 0.56% | $8.5B | — |
| JCPB BondsJPMorgan Core Plus Bond ETF | 0/5 short2/3 long | −0.8% | −1.8% | −2.5% | −1.3% | −1.3% | +19.8% | +3.0% | — | 5.4% | 0.14 | −16.7% | 0.40% | $16B | — |
| BNDX BondsVanguard Total International Bond ETF | 4/5 short1/3 long | 0.0% | −1.0% | −1.2% | −0.7% | −1.4% | +13.4% | +0.8% | +15.0% | 4.9% | 0.06 | −16.2% | 0.07% | $122B | — |
| BINC BondsiShares Flexible Income Active ETF | 3/5 short1/3 long | −0.9% | −1.4% | −1.1% | −0.2% | +0.7% | +21.2% | — | — | — | — | −2.7% | 0.52% | $17B | — |
| TIP BondsiShares TIPS Bond ETF | 2/5 short1/3 long | −0.2% | −1.7% | −2.1% | −0.7% | −1.5% | +13.3% | −0.3% | +23.5% | 6.2% | 0.02 | −14.5% | 0.18% | $14B | — |
| MBB BondsiShares MBS ETF | 0/5 short1/3 long | −0.8% | −2.6% | −3.5% | −2.1% | −1.9% | +18.5% | −0.8% | +9.5% | 7.0% | 0.01 | −17.7% | 0.04% | $35B | — |
| CGCP BondsCapital Group Core Plus Income ETF | 0/5 short1/3 long | −1.1% | −2.2% | −3.0% | −2.1% | −2.0% | +18.5% | — | — | — | — | −15.1% | 0.34% | $8.4B | — |
| SCHZ BondsSchwab U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF | 0/5 short0/3 long | −0.6% | −1.7% | −2.6% | −1.6% | −1.9% | +16.2% | −1.6% | +15.0% | 6.1% | -0.02 | −18.7% | 0.03% | $11B | — |
| AGG BondsiShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF | 0/5 short0/3 long | −0.6% | −1.7% | −2.6% | −1.7% | −1.9% | +16.2% | −1.5% | +13.3% | 6.1% | -0.02 | −18.4% | 0.03% | $139B | — |
| BND BondsVanguard Total Bond Market ETF | 0/5 short0/3 long | −0.6% | −2.0% | −2.8% | −1.8% | −2.1% | +15.7% | −1.8% | +13.2% | 6.1% | -0.03 | −18.6% | 0.03% | $389B | — |
| SPAB BondsState Street SPDR Portfolio Aggregate Bond ETF | 0/5 short0/3 long | −0.7% | −1.8% | −2.6% | −1.6% | −1.9% | +16.1% | −1.6% | +13.1% | 6.0% | -0.02 | −18.5% | 0.03% | $10B | — |
| TOTL BondsState Street DoubleLine Total Return Tactical ETF | 0/5 short0/3 long | −0.4% | −2.2% | −3.3% | −2.7% | −2.6% | +17.4% | +0.7% | +12.7% | 5.7% | 0.05 | −16.5% | 0.55% | $3.7B | — |
| GOVT BondsiShares U.S. Treasury Bond ETF | 0/5 short0/3 long | −0.2% | −1.3% | −2.2% | −1.5% | −1.8% | +12.7% | −3.5% | +7.1% | 6.0% | -0.09 | −19.1% | 0.05% | $42B | — |
| BKAG BondsBNY Mellon Core Bond ETF | 0/5 short0/3 long | −0.6% | −1.7% | −2.5% | −1.8% | −1.9% | +16.1% | −1.8% | — | 6.1% | -0.03 | −18.5% | 0.00% | $1.5B | — |
How did IUSB do year by year?
This table shows each investment's total return in every full calendar year since 2015, along with where IUSB ranked among its popular alternatives each year. Annual results reveal how consistently each one kept pace with IUSB and how far its good and bad years diverged, detail that multiyear averages tend to smooth over.
Note: IUSB began trading on June 12, 2014, so the table starts with 2015, its first full calendar year, and cannot show how it fared during the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or two other sell-offs.
- IUSB finished ahead of the S&P 500 in two of its 11 full calendar years, and behind it in each of the last three.
- Among its popular alternatives, JCPB came out ahead of IUSB most often, in five of the six years both traded.
- Ranked against its popular alternatives each year, IUSB finished in the top quarter in no of 11 years and in the bottom quarter in no. In 2025, it ranked 16 of 22.
Newest year first. Green marks a year in which the fund came out ahead of IUSB; gray means the two finished within a fraction of a point. The rank row places IUSB among the alternatives that traded the full year; dark green is the top quarter and red the bottom quarter.
| Investment | Years ahead of IUSB | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IUSB This pageiShares Core Universal USD Bond ETF | — | +7.4% | +2.1% | +6.2% | −13.0% | −1.3% | +7.6% | +9.1% | −0.3% | +3.8% | +4.0% | +0.4% |
| Rank among alternatives | Top quarter in 0 of 11 | 16 of 22 | 16 of 22 | 14 of 21 | 9 of 21 | 11 of 21 | 12 of 21 | 12 of 20 | 8 of 20 | 12 of 20 | 11 of 18 | 10 of 17 |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 9 of 11 | +17.7% | +24.9% | +26.2% | −18.2% | +28.7% | +18.3% | +31.2% | −4.6% | +21.7% | +12.0% | +1.2% |
| JNK State Street SPDR Bloomberg High Yield Bond ETF | 8 of 11 | +8.8% | +7.7% | +12.4% | −12.2% | +4.0% | +4.9% | +14.9% | −3.3% | +6.5% | +14.4% | −6.8% |
| HYG iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 8 of 11 | +8.6% | +8.0% | +11.6% | −11.0% | +3.8% | +4.5% | +14.1% | −2.0% | +6.1% | +13.4% | −5.0% |
| EMB iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF | 7 of 11 | +13.9% | +5.5% | +10.6% | −18.6% | −2.2% | +5.4% | +15.5% | −5.5% | +10.3% | +9.3% | +1.0% |
| FALN iShares Fallen Angels USD Bond ETF | 7 of 9 | +8.9% | +7.7% | +13.5% | −13.8% | +5.4% | +14.9% | +17.4% | −5.0% | +8.7% | — | — |
| IGIB iShares 5-10 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF | 5 of 11 | +9.6% | +3.5% | +9.2% | −14.0% | −1.7% | +9.7% | +14.6% | −0.7% | +3.5% | +3.3% | +0.6% |
| VCIT Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF | 7 of 11 | +9.3% | +3.2% | +9.0% | −14.0% | −1.8% | +9.4% | +14.1% | −1.8% | +5.3% | +5.3% | +0.9% |
| GTO Invesco Total Return Bond ETF | 5 of 9 | +7.2% | +2.6% | +6.0% | −14.8% | −0.4% | +10.8% | +11.7% | −0.8% | +7.4% | — | — |
| SPBO State Street SPDR Portfolio Corporate Bond ETF | 5 of 11 | +7.8% | +2.6% | +8.8% | −15.7% | −1.4% | +10.3% | +14.7% | −1.8% | +5.4% | +5.0% | −1.5% |
| USIG iShares Broad USD Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF | 5 of 11 | +7.9% | +2.6% | +8.7% | −15.3% | −1.3% | +9.4% | +14.0% | −2.2% | +5.7% | +5.6% | −1.5% |
| FBND Fidelity Total Bond ETF | 5 of 11 | +7.6% | +2.1% | +6.8% | −12.5% | −0.4% | +9.4% | +9.8% | −0.6% | +3.5% | +6.7% | −1.0% |
| LQD iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF | 6 of 11 | +7.9% | +0.9% | +9.4% | −17.9% | −1.8% | +11.0% | +17.4% | −3.8% | +7.0% | +6.2% | −1.3% |
| BOND PIMCO Active Bond Exchange-Traded Fund | 6 of 11 | +8.4% | +2.8% | +6.5% | −14.6% | −0.8% | +7.8% | +8.5% | +0.4% | +4.8% | +2.8% | +1.2% |
| JCPB JPMorgan Core Plus Bond ETF | 5 of 6 | +8.0% | +2.9% | +7.1% | −12.9% | −0.5% | +9.2% | — | — | — | — | — |
| BNDX Vanguard Total International Bond ETF | 5 of 11 | +2.9% | +3.6% | +8.8% | −12.8% | −2.3% | +4.6% | +7.8% | +2.8% | +2.4% | +4.6% | +1.2% |
| BINC iShares Flexible Income Active ETF | 1 of 2 | +7.6% | +5.8% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| TIP iShares TIPS Bond ETF | 4 of 11 | +6.8% | +1.7% | +3.8% | −12.3% | +5.7% | +10.8% | +8.4% | −1.4% | +2.9% | +4.7% | −1.8% |
| MBB iShares MBS ETF | 4 of 11 | +8.4% | +1.3% | +5.0% | −11.7% | −1.6% | +4.1% | +6.2% | +0.8% | +2.5% | +1.3% | +1.1% |
| SCHZ Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF | 1 of 11 | +7.2% | +1.3% | +5.6% | −13.2% | −1.7% | +7.4% | +8.7% | −0.1% | +5.4% | +2.2% | +0.4% |
| AGG iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF | 0 of 11 | +7.2% | +1.3% | +5.7% | −13.0% | −1.8% | +7.5% | +8.5% | +0.1% | +3.6% | +2.4% | +0.5% |
| TOTL State Street DoubleLine Total Return Tactical ETF | 3 of 10 | +7.7% | +3.1% | +5.6% | −11.6% | −1.0% | +3.6% | +6.9% | +0.8% | +3.5% | +2.8% | — |
| GOVT iShares U.S. Treasury Bond ETF | 2 of 11 | +3.8% | +3.0% | +4.2% | −13.4% | −1.1% | +7.3% | +7.3% | +0.3% | +2.2% | +0.8% | +0.9% |
Risk and diversification
How IUSB has fallen, how it held up in crashes beside the S&P 500 and its popular alternatives, and what moves independently of it.
What were IUSB's worst declines?
A drawdown is the decline from a peak to the lowest point before a new high. This section presents IUSB's two deepest drawdowns since it began trading in 2014, alongside the S&P 500's return over the same dates, and how long each took to recover. Together, these figures show how much an investor could have lost and how long it took to get back to even.
Note: IUSB began trading on June 12, 2014, so this list cannot include the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or two other sell-offs. The crash tests on this page show how older funds and the S&P 500 fared through those years.
- Not every decline was the market's doing: IUSB fell 17.9% from December 2020 to October 2022, while the S&P 500 rose 0.2%.
- The slowest recovery came after IUSB fell 17.9% from December 2020 to October 2022; it did not regain that peak until October 2025, three years later.
Green means IUSB fell less than the S&P 500 over the same dates. Based on daily closing prices with dividends reinvested.
| During | IUSB fell | S&P 500, same dates | Peak | Low | Time to the low | Back at the peak | Time to recover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 bear market | −17.9% | +0.2% | Dec 2020 | Oct 2022 | 22 months | Oct 2025 | 3 years |
| Covid crash | −9.9% | −19.1% | Mar 2020 | Mar 2020 | Under a month | Jun 2020 | 3 months |
How did IUSB do in stock market crashes?
This section measures how far IUSB, the S&P 500 and each alternative fell from peak to trough during every major market crash since 2000. A smaller decline means an investment held up better, and comparing results across crashes shows whether that resilience was consistent or a one-off.
Note: IUSB began trading on June 12, 2014, so its row reads "Not yet trading" for the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or two other sell-offs. The older alternatives and the S&P 500 show how those crashes played out.
- IUSB fell less than the S&P 500 in all six crashes it has traded through. The clearest case was the Covid crash, when IUSB fell 9.9% and the S&P 500 fell 33.7%.
- Among its popular alternatives, BNDX held up best, falling less than IUSB in four of the six crashes they both traded through.
- IUSB began trading after the 2008 financial crisis, but seven of its popular alternatives lived through it. The mildest fall among them was MBB's 3.8%, against 55.2% for the S&P 500.
Newest crash first. Each figure is the fund's deepest fall within the crash window; green means a smaller fall than IUSB.
| Investment | Held up better | 2023 regional bank crisisMar 2023 | 2022 bear marketJan 2022 | Covid crashFeb 2020 | Late-2018 sell-offSep 2018 | February 2018 volatility shockFeb 2018 | 2015 China and oil sell-offAug 2015 | 2011 euro debt crisisJul 2011 | 2010 flash crashMay 2010 | 2008 financial crisisOct 2007 | Dot-com bustMar 2000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IUSB This pageiShares Core Universal USD Bond ETF | — | 0.0% | −14.8% | −9.9% | −1.1% | −0.8% | −1.7% | Not yet trading | Not yet trading | Not yet trading | Not yet trading |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 0 of 6 | −3.4% | −24.5% | −33.7% | −19.3% | −6.5% | −12.8% | −17.9% | −1.5% | −55.2% | −47.5% |
| JNK State Street SPDR Bloomberg High Yield Bond ETF | 0 of 6 | −1.1% | −16.3% | −22.9% | −7.1% | −1.6% | −13.2% | −10.1% | 0.0% | — | — |
| HYG iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 0 of 6 | −1.1% | −15.3% | −22.0% | −6.4% | −1.5% | −10.5% | −9.8% | 0.0% | −34.2% | — |
| EMB iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF | 0 of 6 | −0.2% | −24.8% | −26.6% | −4.5% | −2.0% | −4.6% | −7.1% | 0.0% | — | — |
| FALN iShares Fallen Angels USD Bond ETF | 0 of 5 | −0.7% | −17.7% | −29.1% | −7.6% | −2.2% | — | — | — | — | — |
| IGIB iShares 5-10 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF | 0 of 6 | 0.0% | −17.3% | −16.2% | −1.4% | −0.5% | −1.4% | −1.8% | −0.7% | −14.5% | — |
| VCIT Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF | 0 of 6 | 0.0% | −17.4% | −16.9% | −1.2% | −1.0% | −2.0% | −3.0% | 0.0% | — | — |
| GTO Invesco Total Return Bond ETF | 1 of 6 | 0.0% | −17.2% | −11.3% | −2.8% | −0.9% | 0.0% | −31.8% | −5.3% | — | — |
| SPBO State Street SPDR Portfolio Corporate Bond ETF | 0 of 6 | 0.0% | −18.6% | −20.0% | −1.9% | −0.8% | −2.3% | −1.8% | — | — | — |
| USIG iShares Broad USD Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF | 0 of 6 | −0.1% | −18.1% | −18.9% | −1.9% | −1.0% | −2.1% | −2.4% | −0.7% | −22.2% | — |
| FBND Fidelity Total Bond ETF | 0 of 6 | 0.0% | −14.4% | −16.1% | −1.1% | −1.4% | −3.2% | — | — | — | — |
| LQD iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF | 0 of 6 | −0.1% | −21.3% | −21.8% | −2.6% | −1.2% | −2.7% | −3.2% | 0.0% | −21.5% | — |
| BOND PIMCO Active Bond Exchange-Traded Fund | 0 of 6 | 0.0% | −16.5% | −10.9% | −1.1% | −0.7% | −1.8% | — | — | — | — |
| JCPB JPMorgan Core Plus Bond ETF | 2 of 3 | 0.0% | −14.3% | −6.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| BNDX Vanguard Total International Bond ETF | 4 of 6 | 0.0% | −13.7% | −5.9% | −0.8% | −0.2% | −1.1% | — | — | — | — |
| TIP iShares TIPS Bond ETF | 0 of 6 | 0.0% | −14.3% | −11.2% | −2.0% | −1.1% | −2.5% | −3.8% | −0.2% | −14.4% | — |
| MBB iShares MBS ETF | 2 of 6 | 0.0% | −14.4% | −4.3% | −1.1% | −0.6% | −1.0% | −0.8% | 0.0% | −3.8% | — |
| SCHZ Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF | 0 of 6 | 0.0% | −14.6% | −10.3% | −1.1% | −0.7% | −1.6% | −1.4% | — | — | — |
| AGG iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF | 0 of 6 | 0.0% | −14.5% | −9.6% | −1.1% | −0.8% | −1.5% | −1.3% | −0.4% | −12.8% | — |
| TOTL State Street DoubleLine Total Return Tactical ETF | 2 of 6 | 0.0% | −13.2% | −7.3% | −0.7% | −0.6% | −1.3% | — | — | — | — |
| GOVT iShares U.S. Treasury Bond ETF | 3 of 6 | 0.0% | −13.0% | −4.6% | −0.9% | −0.3% | −2.1% | — | — | — | — |
How closely does IUSB move with the S&P 500?
Upside capture measures how much of the S&P 500's gains an investment kept in the months the market rose, and downside capture how much of its losses it took in the months the market fell. An investment that captures more of the gains than the losses has compounded ahead of the market over time. This section compares IUSB with its popular alternatives on both measures, and on beta (how strongly each has moved with the market), over the past 10 years.
- Over the past 10 years, IUSB captured 15% of the S&P 500's gains in rising months and 20% of its losses in falling months, with a beta of 0.16. Its share of the market's losses was slightly larger than its share of the gains.
- Nine of the 19 popular alternatives had a higher capture ratio (upside capture divided by downside capture) than IUSB's 0.74, led by FALN, TIP and HYG.
Monthly total returns over the past 10 years, measured against SPY. 100% capture or a beta of 1.00 means moving in line with the S&P 500. Green marks a better figure than IUSB's: more upside, less downside or a higher capture ratio. Sorted by capture ratio.
| Investment | Upside capture | Downside capture | Capture ratio | Beta |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IUSB This pageiShares Core Universal USD Bond ETF | 15% | 20% | 0.74 | 0.16 |
| FALN iShares Fallen Angels USD Bond ETF | 42% | 47% | 0.88 | 0.49 |
| TIP iShares TIPS Bond ETF | 15% | 17% | 0.87 | 0.18 |
| HYG iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 34% | 40% | 0.84 | 0.39 |
| JNK State Street SPDR Bloomberg High Yield Bond ETF | 35% | 43% | 0.83 | 0.41 |
| BNDX Vanguard Total International Bond ETF | 11% | 13% | 0.83 | 0.14 |
| GTO Invesco Total Return Bond ETF | 19% | 24% | 0.80 | 0.22 |
| FBND Fidelity Total Bond ETF | 17% | 21% | 0.80 | 0.18 |
| IGIB iShares 5-10 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF | 22% | 29% | 0.78 | 0.27 |
| VCIT Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF | 22% | 29% | 0.76 | 0.26 |
| BOND PIMCO Active Bond Exchange-Traded Fund | 16% | 22% | 0.73 | 0.19 |
| SPBO State Street SPDR Portfolio Corporate Bond ETF | 22% | 31% | 0.72 | 0.27 |
| USIG iShares Broad USD Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF | 22% | 31% | 0.71 | 0.27 |
| SCHZ Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF | 14% | 20% | 0.71 | 0.16 |
| AGG iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF | 12% | 17% | 0.71 | 0.14 |
| GOVT iShares U.S. Treasury Bond ETF | 6% | 8% | 0.71 | 0.06 |
| TOTL State Street DoubleLine Total Return Tactical ETF | 13% | 18% | 0.69 | 0.15 |
| LQD iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF | 25% | 39% | 0.64 | 0.33 |
| EMB iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF | 36% | 56% | 0.63 | 0.46 |
| MBB iShares MBS ETF | 13% | 21% | 0.62 | 0.14 |
What diversifies IUSB?
Correlation measures how closely two investments move together, on a scale from 1 (in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to -1 (in opposite directions). This section lists large ETFs and stocks whose returns have had a low correlation with IUSB's. Because such investments tend not to fall at the same time, pairing IUSB with them can reduce a portfolio's overall swings.
- Moving a fifth of the money in IUSB into DBMF would have cut the portfolio's volatility by 33% over the past 5 years and raised its annual return (-0.3% for IUSB alone, +2.0% for the mix).
- FIX made money in three of the three calendar years in which IUSB lost money.
- Among large ETFs, DXJ, EMLP and GLD have moved largely independently of IUSB over the past 5 years, with correlations of 0.49 or lower, and each still earned a positive 5-year return.
Only ETFs with at least $1.0B in assets and stocks worth at least $10B, with a correlation below 0.5 over the past 5 years and a positive return, are included, ranked by Sharpe ratio; funds that hold the same thing are shown once. The year columns are the years in which IUSB lost money. The last two columns show a portfolio that is 80% IUSB and 20% the other investment, rebalanced monthly.
ETFs
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2022 | 2021 | 2018 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IUSB iShares Core Universal USD Bond ETF (this page) | 1.00 | +0.2% | 0.04 | −13.0% | −1.3% | −0.3% | 6.6% | −0.3% |
| DXJ InternationalWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund | 0.27 | +225% | 1.34 | +6.0% | +18.0% | −19.8% | 6.4% | +4.8% |
| EMLP Broad MarketFirst Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund | 0.49 | +101% | 1.04 | +10.4% | +23.1% | −8.7% | 7.1% | +2.8% |
| GLD CommoditiesSPDR Gold Shares | 0.40 | +126% | 0.96 | −0.8% | −4.2% | −1.9% | 7.3% | +3.4% |
| SPMO Broad MarketInvesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 0.43 | +136% | 0.93 | −10.4% | +22.7% | −0.9% | 8.0% | +4.1% |
| XLE EnergyState Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | 0.10 | +177% | 0.93 | +64.4% | +53.3% | −18.2% | 7.8% | +4.6% |
| AMLP EnergyAlerian MLP ETF | 0.22 | +111% | 0.89 | +25.5% | +39.1% | −12.6% | 7.0% | +3.5% |
| PTLC Broad MarketPacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF | 0.47 | +57.4% | 0.83 | −8.6% | +27.0% | +1.5% | 6.6% | +1.9% |
| DBMF AlternativesiMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF | -0.55 | +59.7% | 0.82 | +21.6% | +11.5% | — | 4.4% | +2.0% |
Stocks
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2022 | 2021 | 2018 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IUSB iShares Core Universal USD Bond ETF (this page) | 1.00 | +0.2% | 0.04 | −13.0% | −1.3% | −0.3% | 6.6% | −0.3% |
| CAH Medical - DistributionCardinal Health, Inc. | 0.25 | +479% | 1.55 | +54.1% | −0.4% | −24.5% | 8.3% | +7.0% |
| CLS Hardware, Equipment & PartsCelestica Inc. | 0.12 | +3,143% | 1.47 | +1.3% | +37.9% | −16.3% | 13.4% | +18.9% |
| FIX Engineering & ConstructionComfort Systems USA, Inc. | 0.19 | +1,636% | 1.46 | +17.0% | +89.0% | +0.8% | 11.2% | +15.1% |
| MCK Medical - DistributionMcKesson Corporation | 0.10 | +413% | 1.44 | +51.8% | +44.2% | −28.4% | 7.6% | +6.5% |
| MPC Oil & Gas Refining & MarketingMarathon Petroleum Corporation | 0.10 | +690% | 1.41 | +86.6% | +61.0% | −8.2% | 8.7% | +8.9% |
Common questions
What was IUSB's worst drawdown?
IUSB's deepest decline since it began trading in 2014 was 17.9%, from December 2020 to October 2022. It took about three years from the low to climb back to its old high. Because IUSB launched in June 2014, that record does not include the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or two other sell-offs.
What were IUSB's best and worst years?
Over 11 full calendar years, IUSB's best year was 2019, when it returned 9.1%. Its worst was 2022, with a return of -13.0%.
Is there a better investment than IUSB?
Among IUSB's popular alternatives, HYG was ahead of IUSB in most short and long periods, though with much bigger swings (7.5% volatility against 5.9%). VCIT tracks the same thing for 0.03% a year against IUSB's 0.06%, and has kept pace over the past decade: about $30 less in fees on $10,000 over 10 years.
Is IUSB more volatile than the S&P 500?
No. IUSB's volatility over the past 5 years was 5.9%, 34% of the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, IUSB's return lands within 5.9% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump.
What is IUSB's Sharpe ratio?
IUSB's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.04, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so IUSB earned less for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings.
How correlated is IUSB with the S&P 500?
Over the past 5 years, IUSB's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.64 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They often move together: some diversification next to an index fund, but not a cushion. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against IUSB instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a IUSB holding.
What are the best alternatives to IUSB?
Of the 25 popular alternatives we compared, two outperformed IUSB in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes, with dividends reinvested: JNK and HYG.
Did IUSB outperform the S&P 500?
IUSB finished ahead of the S&P 500 (SPY) in two of 11 full calendar years. In 2025, it returned +7.4%, against +17.7% for the index.
How did IUSB do in stock market crashes?
IUSB fell less than the S&P 500 (SPY) in six of the six major crashes it has traded through, and further in no. The clearest case was the Covid crash, when IUSB fell 9.9% and the S&P 500 fell 33.7%.
What diversifies IUSB?
These had a low correlation with IUSB over the past 5 years and still earned a positive 5-year return: among large ETFs, DXJ (correlation 0.27), EMLP (correlation 0.49) and GLD (correlation 0.40); among large stocks, CAH (correlation 0.25), CLS (correlation 0.12) and FIX (correlation 0.19). A correlation near zero means the two have moved largely independently.
How we measure
- Short-term periods are 1M, 3M, 6M, YTD, 1Y; long-term periods are 3Y, 5Y, 10Y. An investment outperformed in a period when its total return, with dividends reinvested, was higher than IUSB's. Returns within 0.5 points or 3% of IUSB's, whichever is larger, count as a tie.
- "Qualified" means outperforming in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods. "All-weather" means outperforming in every long-term period and all but one short-term period.
- Popular alternatives are the funds and stocks most often compared with this one. We include only those that trade today, are not leveraged or inverse, and hold at least $200 million.
- Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily returns over 5 years, a measure of how much the price typically swings in a year. The Sharpe ratio is the return above cash for each unit of that volatility.
- A decline, or drawdown, runs from a peak to the lowest close before the next high. The worst decline ever uses all the price history we have; comparisons between funds use the past 10 years so that younger funds are judged on the same stretch.
- Sector overlap is the share of assets two funds hold in the same sectors. Correlation and the mixed-portfolio figures use monthly returns.
- Upside and downside capture follow Morningstar's definition: the compound monthly return in the months the S&P 500 rose (or fell), divided by the S&P 500's compound return in those months. Beta measures how strongly monthly returns have moved with the S&P 500. All three use the same window for every investment.
- Figures are computed from daily adjusted prices and update after each trading day. Past performance does not predict future results.
More research
Popular alternatives to IUSB
VCITVanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF
BNDXVanguard Total International Bond ETF
AGGiShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF
BNDVanguard Total Bond Market ETF
GOVTiShares U.S. Treasury Bond ETF