Relative Intelligence · Electrical Equipment

How Bloom Energy (BE) compares with the whole market and its popular alternatives
Built by QuantCommons' quantitative engine, this page is about relative opportunity, not data on BE alone. It places BE (Bloom Energy Corporation) against 18 popular alternatives, its neighboring categories and the entire market of over 10,000 U.S.-listed stocks and ETFs, and surfaces what has done better on consistent outperformance, return for the risk taken, behavior in real market crashes and diversification. The result is a clearer view of where BE stands in the market, and of the alternatives worth a closer look.
Period covered: BE's full trading record, from July 2018 through September 2026. The crash tests reach back to 2000 using older funds and the S&P 500. All returns include reinvested dividends. Data as of October 20, 2026.
Data as of October 20, 2026. Full tables and charts read best on a larger screen.
On this page12 sections
Key findings
- Right nowThe slide is BE's own: it is 35.6% below its high, against 1.3% for the S&P 500. On the flip side, over the past 3 months, BE rose 13.0% against 3.9% for the S&P 500 and 3.2% for the Nasdaq 100. At a glance ↓
- Stock or market?BE held up far better than its industry: it rose 13.0% over the past 3 months while the electrical equipment ETF XLI (State Street Industrial Select Sector SPDR ETF) fell 6.1%. The S&P 500 rose 3.9%.
- Past 1 to 3 yearsBE has run far ahead of the market, rising 104% over the past year against 15.8% for the S&P 500 and 17.9% for the Nasdaq 100. The same gap shows up over 3 years (1,869% against 89.3%). BE finished ahead of the S&P 500 in both 2024 and 2025. By year ↓
- Long termBE turned $10,000 into $106,000 over the past 5 years, against $18,200 in the S&P 500. BE's 5-year return of 965% puts it among the best of the stocks worth at least $300 million with that much history. The S&P 500 returned 81.7%. Growth of $10,000 ↓
- In a crashIn the late-2018 sell-off, BE fell 72.4%, against 19.3% for the S&P 500, and more than electrical equipment peers such as CAT (Caterpillar, 28.5%). BE fell further than the S&P 500 in four of the last four sell-offs, including the late-2018 sell-off (72.4% against 19.3%). Crash tests ↓
- DiversificationAgainst the S&P 500, BE has a correlation of 0.46 over 5 years, more closely than 63% of stocks worth at least $300 million. Next to an index fund it is some diversification, but not a hedge. Over 5 years, BE's beta versus the S&P 500 was 3.79: in the S&P 500's rising months it gained 3.1 times as much as the index, and in falling months it lost about twice as much. Market capture ↓
- Better options
- Nearby categories and themes
- FIX (Comfort Systems USA, engineering & construction) and STRL (Sterling Infrastructure, engineering & construction) earned more than BE with less volatility over the past 5 years. FIX returned 77.0% a year at 46.7% volatility, against 60.5% a year at 89.6%.
- Whole market
- Few investments have done better on both counts: only nine of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than BE with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them MU (Micron Technology), FIX (Comfort Systems USA) and CLS (Celestica).
How much would $10,000 in BE have grown?
This chart tracks a hypothetical $10,000 investment in BE over the past 8 years, with dividends reinvested, alongside the same amount in the S&P 500, investments that ended ahead of BE over the same span and BE's popular alternatives, among those that traded for the entire period. A second view covers the past 5 years, the period the better options further down the page are judged on. It shows not only where each investment ended up but also how smooth or uneven the path was.
Note: BE began trading on July 25, 2018, so the chart cannot reach back to the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or four other sell-offs. It covers the most recent 8 years of BE's record, starting at the end of September 2018.
- $10,000 invested in BE at the end of September 2018 would have grown to $81,273 by September 2026, more than the $29,568 it would have become in SPY, an S&P 500 fund.
- Five of the eight other investments on the chart ended ahead of BE, and STRL finished highest, at $343,410.
Choose a period
From the end of September 2018 to the end of September 2026. The scale is logarithmic, so equal steps up the chart are equal percentage gains. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 111 of the 3,000 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of BE; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- STRL$343,410+3,334% total · +55.6% a year
- FIX$306,821+2,968% total · +53.4% a year
- POWL$250,291+2,403% total · +49.6% a year
- VRT$248,792+2,388% total · +49.4% a year
- MOD$115,676+1,057% total · +35.8% a year
- BE$81,273+713% total · +29.9% a year
- CAT$62,856+529% total · +25.8% a year
- ETN$58,648+486% total · +24.7% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$29,568+196% total · +14.5% a year
- APD$20,070+101% total · +9.1% a year
From the end of September 2021 to the end of September 2026. The scale is logarithmic, so equal steps up the chart are equal percentage gains. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 7 of the 3,628 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of BE; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- CLS$407,013+3,970% total · +110% a year
- POWL$273,283+2,633% total · +93.8% a year
- FIX$236,701+2,267% total · +88.3% a year
- STRL$216,918+2,069% total · +85.0% a year
- MOD$152,122+1,421% total · +72.4% a year
- BE$147,957+1,380% total · +71.4% a year
- CAT$46,130+361% total · +35.8% a year
- ETN$31,102+211% total · +25.5% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$19,000+90.0% total · +13.7% a year
- APD$12,250+22.5% total · +4.1% a year
BE at a glance
This section summarizes the key facts about the stock, its returns over periods from one to ten years and the risk it has carried, with dividends reinvested throughout. These figures serve as the baseline for every comparison that follows.
Note: BE began trading on July 25, 2018, so every figure here, including its worst decline, covers only the time since then. None of them reflect the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or four other sell-offs.
- BE is still 35.6% below its all-time high.
- BE's deepest decline since it began trading in 2018 was 92.5%, from September 2018 to October 2019. It took 15 months from the low to climb back to its old high.
- Over seven full calendar years, BE's best was 2025, when it returned 291%, and its worst was 2019, when it lost 25.1%. It lost money in four of those years.
The company
- Market value
- $66B
- Industry
- Electrical Equipment & Parts
- Price history from
- July 2018
Returns
- Past 1 year
- +104%total return
- Past 3 years
- +1,869%+170% a year
- Past 5 years
- +965%+60.5% a year
- Best calendar year
- +291%2025
- Worst calendar year
- −25.1%2019
- Losing years
- 4 of 7full calendar years
Risk
- Volatility
- 89.6%typical yearly swing, 5 years
- Sharpe ratio
- 0.96return per unit of risk, 5 years
- Worst decline ever
- −92.5%Sep 2018 to Oct 2019
- From its all-time high
- −35.6%below the peak
BE against the whole market
Where BE ranks among every stock and fund, and what across the market has done better.
How does BE rank among all stocks?
This section ranks BE on return, volatility, risk-adjusted return and worst decline against every stock worth at least $300 million with enough history. Where the comparisons with its popular alternatives show how BE stacks up against its peers, these rankings show where it stands in the market as a whole.
- BE's 3-year return ranks in the top 1% of the 3,017 stocks worth at least $300 million with 3 years of history.
- BE is among the more volatile stocks: its price swings rank in the bottom 6% of the 2,893 stocks worth at least $300 million, where the top is the calmest.
Ranked against U.S.-listed stocks worth at least $300M that have enough history for each measure, so the count changes from row to row; smaller stocks are left out. Lower volatility and smaller declines rank higher.
| Measure | BE | Rank | Standing |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +104% | 161 of 3,287 | top 5% |
| 3-year return | +1,869% | 4 of 3,017 | top 1% |
| 5-year return | +965% | 13 of 2,893 | top 1% |
| Volatility, 5 years | 89.6% | 2,718 of 2,893 | bottom 7% |
| Sharpe ratio, 5 years | 0.96 | 122 of 2,893 | top 4% |
What has beaten BE on both return and risk?
Each dot is an investment, placed by how much it earned a year over the past 5 years (higher is better) and how much its price swung, its volatility (further left is calmer). BE sits where the dashed lines cross. Anything in the green box above and to the left earned more than BE with smaller swings, a better trade-off over this period on both counts. Past results are no promise, but a name in the box is worth a closer look.
- Nine stocks worth at least $500 million sit in the green region: each earned more than BE over the past 5 years with smaller price swings. That is fewer than 1% of the 3,633 screened. Few investments beat it on both counts.
- Among those with at least half BE's swings, CLS has the best return for its risk: 101% a year at 59.7% volatility, 33% less than BE's 89.6%, and a Sharpe ratio (return above cash per unit of volatility) of 1.47 against 0.96 for BE.
- None of BE's popular alternatives made it, but FIX (engineering & construction) did: 77.0% a year at 46.7% volatility, 48% less than BE's 89.6%.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested, and volatility the annualized swing in daily prices, both over 5 years. Labeled dots are the strongest picks from the table below and the names called out above, colored by how close they sit to BE. 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million were screened. Hover over a dot for its figures.
- Same and neighboring categories, and shared themes
- The whole market
Is there a better investment than BE?
Investments that beat BE over the past 5 years on return, volatility, drawdowns, consistency, crash losses or fees, from its popular alternatives out to the whole market.
- Looking beyond its popular alternatives, FIX (engineering & construction) and STRL (engineering & construction) earned more than BE with less volatility over the past 5 years. FIX returned 77.0% a year at 46.7% volatility, against 60.5% a year at 89.6%.
- Few investments have done better on both counts: only nine of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than BE with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them MU, FIX and CLS.
How this works
The table below lists investments that beat BE over the past 5 years on at least one of these measures: a higher annual return with lower volatility, a higher annual return at similar volatility, a similar return with lower volatility, a higher Sharpe ratio with a smaller worst decline, a higher total return in most periods from 3 months to 10 years, or smaller losses in recent market crashes. It checks BE's popular alternatives first, then the rest of its own and neighboring categories, then every stock and fund worth at least $500 million, and shows the strongest few in each group. The full list of those with a higher return and lower volatility than BE follows the table.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested. Annual return, volatility and the Sharpe ratio cover 5 years; the worst decline covers the past 10 years. Green marks a better figure than BE's. "On the frontier" means no other option shown or tested earned more with less volatility. Funds that hold the same thing are shown once. Beyond the popular alternatives, nothing with more than 1.5× BE's volatility counts as better.
These figures cover the past 5 years. Green marks a better figure than BE's.
| Investment | Why it is better | Past 5 years | Downside | Long run | Fit | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Annual return?higher is better | Volatility?lower is calmer | Sharpe?return per unit of risk | Worst decline?past 10 years | 5Y returntotal | Corr. with BE?lower diversifies more | Expenseper year | |||
| +60.5% | 89.6% | 0.96 | −92.5% | +965% | 1.00 | — | |||
| +12.7% | 17.1% | 0.79 | −33.7% | +81.7% | 0.46 | 0.09% | |||
| Same and neighboring categories, and shared themesbest 4 shownEverything else in Electrical Equipment and the categories next to it (Industrial Machinery, Building Products, Engineering & Construction, Electric Utilities), plus BE's specific themes. 4 of 119 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| On the frontierHigher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineSmaller losses in recent crashes | +77.0% | 46.7% | 1.46 | −49.7% | +1,636% | 0.49 | — | ||
STRLSterling Infrastructure, Inc. · Engineering & Construction | Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineSmaller losses in recent crashes | +78.4% | 60.0% | 1.26 | −59.6% | +1,708% | 0.31 | — | |
POWLPowell Industries, Inc. · Electrical Equipment | Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineSmaller losses in recent crashes | +87.9% | 65.8% | 1.27 | −68.3% | +2,240% | 0.19 | — | |
MODModine Manufacturing Company · Electrical Equipment | Higher return, lower volatilitySmaller losses in recent crashes | +65.1% | 61.7% | 1.13 | −88.1% | +1,127% | 0.33 | — | |
| The whole marketbest 6 shownEvery other stock and fund worth at least $500 million. 9 of 3,500 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| On the frontierHigher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineSmaller losses in recent crashes | +101% | 59.7% | 1.47 | −80.6% | +3,143% | 0.41 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineSmaller losses in recent crashes | +68.1% | 57.1% | 1.20 | −57.6% | +1,244% | 0.34 | — | ||
ATIATI Inc. · Metals & Mining | On the frontierHigher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineSmaller losses in recent crashes | +61.8% | 42.9% | 1.34 | −82.4% | +1,008% | 0.25 | — | |
CRSCarpenter Technology Corporation · Metals & Mining | On the frontierHigher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineSmaller losses in recent crashes | +63.9% | 46.5% | 1.30 | −74.7% | +1,082% | 0.39 | — | |
BELFBBel Fuse Inc. · Hardware, Equipment & Parts | On the frontierHigher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineSmaller losses in recent crashes | +78.0% | 52.1% | 1.37 | −79.8% | +1,688% | 0.44 | — | |
BWLPBW LPG Limited · Marine Shipping | Similar return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineSmaller losses in recent crashes | +60.3% | 50.9% | 1.19 | −68.8% | +958% | 0.13 | — | |
What these numbers mean for BE
- Annual return
- BE returned 60.5% a year over the past 5 years with dividends reinvested, against 12.7% a year for the S&P 500. At that pace, $10,000 became about $106,000. Annual return is the steady yearly rate that would produce the same total result, so investments held over the same span compare fairly. Guide: What is performance and return? →
- Volatility
- BE's volatility over the past 5 years was 89.6%, 5.2 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, BE's return lands within 89.6% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump. Guide: Understanding and measuring risk (volatility) →
- Sharpe ratio
- BE's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.96, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so BE earned more for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings. Guide: Balancing reward with risk (Sharpe ratio) →
- Worst decline
- BE's worst fall from a peak to a low over the past 10 years was 92.5%, against 33.7% for the S&P 500. Losses and gains are not symmetric: climbing back from a 92.5% fall takes a 1,240% gain. Guide: Market crash risk and tail risk →
- Correlation
- Over the past 5 years, BE's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.46 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They often move together: some diversification next to an index fund, but not a cushion. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against BE instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a BE holding. Guide: Correlation and diversification →
Show all 9 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that earned more than BE with less volatility
Out of 3,633 tested over 5 years. Best first; funds that hold the same thing are listed once.
| # | Investment | Found in | Annual return | Volatility | Sharpe | Worst decline | 5Y return | Corr. with BE | Expense |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Whole market | +101% | 59.7% | 1.47 | −80.6% | +3,143% | 0.41 | — | |
| 2 | Whole market | +68.1% | 57.1% | 1.20 | −57.6% | +1,244% | 0.34 | — | |
| 3 | ATIATI Inc. · Metals & Mining | Whole market | +61.8% | 42.9% | 1.34 | −82.4% | +1,008% | 0.25 | — |
| 4 | CRSCarpenter Technology Corporation · Metals & Mining | Whole market | +63.9% | 46.5% | 1.30 | −74.7% | +1,082% | 0.39 | — |
| 5 | Same or nearby category | +77.0% | 46.7% | 1.46 | −49.7% | +1,636% | 0.49 | — | |
| 6 | BELFBBel Fuse Inc. · Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Whole market | +78.0% | 52.1% | 1.37 | −79.8% | +1,688% | 0.44 | — |
| 7 | STRLSterling Infrastructure, Inc. · Engineering & Construction | Same or nearby category | +78.4% | 60.0% | 1.26 | −59.6% | +1,708% | 0.31 | — |
| 8 | POWLPowell Industries, Inc. · Electrical Equipment | Same or nearby category | +87.9% | 65.8% | 1.27 | −68.3% | +2,240% | 0.19 | — |
| 9 | MODModine Manufacturing Company · Electrical Equipment | Same or nearby category | +65.1% | 61.7% | 1.13 | −88.1% | +1,127% | 0.33 | — |
BE against its popular alternatives
The investments people most often weigh against BE, compared period by period and year by year.
How do BE's risk and return compare with its alternatives?
This map plots each investment's annual return over the past 5 years against its volatility, the size of its typical price swings. Investments toward the upper left earned more for a smoother ride, and those toward the lower right earned less for a rougher one. The dashed lines cross at BE, which divides the map into what did better or worse on each measure.
- None of the 15 popular alternatives earned more than BE over the past 5 years with smaller price swings, so every higher return on the map came with a bumpier ride.
- Over the past 5 years, BE returned 60.5% a year, more than the S&P 500's 12.7%, with higher volatility (89.6% against 17.1%).
Green points earned more than BE with less volatility; red points earned less with more. Hover over a point for its figures. Total returns with dividends reinvested, annualized.
All figures
| Investment | Annual return | Volatility |
|---|---|---|
| BE This pageBloom Energy Corporation | +60.5% | 89.6% |
| VRT Vertiv Holdings Co | +54.2% | 64.2% |
| CAT Caterpillar Inc. | +31.1% | 31.9% |
| ETN Eaton Corporation plc | +20.4% | 32.1% |
| CMI Cummins Inc. | +19.9% | 29.0% |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | +12.7% | 17.1% |
| LIN Linde plc | +11.5% | 20.9% |
| AMSC American Superconductor Corporation | +8.4% | 87.1% |
| EQIX Equinix, Inc. | +6.6% | 27.8% |
| DLR Digital Realty Trust, Inc. | +6.3% | 29.4% |
| APD Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. | +3.2% | 26.4% |
| NEE NextEra Energy, Inc. | +1.5% | 26.8% |
| GNRC Generac Holdings Inc. | −15.7% | 54.5% |
| EOSE Eos Energy Enterprises, Inc. | −31.5% | 119% |
| BLDP Ballard Power Systems Inc. | −38.1% | 69.5% |
| FCEL FuelCell Energy, Inc. | −44.9% | 103% |
| PLUG Plug Power Inc. | −46.8% | 94.3% |
Has BE consistently beaten its popular alternatives?
This section compares BE with the investments people most often weigh against it, checking each one over seven periods from one month to five years. Counting how often an alternative earned more than BE helps separate lasting outperformance from a single strong stretch.
- None of the 18 popular alternatives outperformed BE in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 2 long-term timeframes. The closest was APD.
- CAT and VRT earned more for the risk they took than BE (a higher Sharpe ratio) and fell less in their worst decline of the past 10 years.
A green cell means the alternative earned more than BE over that period. "Qualified" marks those that did so in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 2 long-term periods.
| Investment | Periods outperformed | Short term | Long term | Risk · 5 years | Fund | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1M | 3M | 6M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | Volatilitylower is calmer | Sharpehigher is better | Worst declinepast 10 years | Expense | Assets | Overlapsame sectors | ||
| BE Bloom Energy Corporation (this page) | — | −18.4% | +13.0% | +2.0% | +126% | +104% | +1,869% | +965% | 89.6% | 0.96 | −92.5% | — | $66B | — |
| APD Chemicals - SpecialtyAir Products and Chemicals, Inc. | 2/5 short0/2 long | +9.0% | +2.7% | +3.5% | +23.1% | +22.2% | +17.4% | +16.9% | 26.4% | 0.25 | −31.8% | — | $67B | — |
| CAT Agricultural - MachineryCaterpillar Inc. | 1/5 short0/2 long | −11.2% | −15.9% | −8.8% | +22.2% | +37.7% | +203% | +288% | 31.9% | 1.01 | −43.4% | — | $333B | — |
| ETN Electrical Equipment & PartsEaton Corporation plc | 1/5 short0/2 long | −12.3% | −4.6% | −5.8% | +17.7% | +2.3% | +104% | +153% | 32.1% | 0.74 | −44.5% | — | $148B | — |
| CMI Industrial - MachineryCummins Inc. | 1/5 short0/2 long | +0.3% | −15.8% | −15.2% | +3.8% | +31.4% | +160% | +148% | 29.0% | 0.77 | −44.0% | — | $74B | — |
| LIN Chemicals - SpecialtyLinde plc | 1/5 short0/2 long | +9.7% | −1.7% | +1.4% | +18.1% | +12.7% | +42.4% | +72.6% | 20.9% | 0.63 | −32.6% | — | $231B | — |
| AMSC Electrical Equipment & PartsAmerican Superconductor Corporation | 1/5 short0/2 long | −15.0% | −20.9% | −36.9% | −18.6% | −57.9% | +327% | +49.4% | 87.1% | 0.52 | −89.1% | — | $1.2B | — |
| EQIX REIT - SpecialtyEquinix, Inc. | 1/5 short0/2 long | −6.6% | −2.5% | −9.7% | +31.2% | +22.2% | +49.1% | +37.4% | 27.8% | 0.37 | −41.8% | — | $97B | — |
| DLR REIT - SpecialtyDigital Realty Trust, Inc. | 1/5 short0/2 long | −5.9% | +0.1% | −12.9% | +15.4% | +4.3% | +65.7% | +35.7% | 29.4% | 0.35 | −48.5% | — | $65B | — |
| NEE Regulated ElectricNextEra Energy, Inc. | 1/5 short0/2 long | −1.0% | −9.7% | −13.0% | −0.4% | −4.3% | +65.9% | +7.5% | 26.8% | 0.19 | −45.0% | — | $165B | — |
| GNRC Industrial - MachineryGenerac Holdings Inc. | 1/5 short0/2 long | −5.1% | −8.7% | −10.4% | +37.9% | −0.6% | +120% | −57.5% | 54.5% | -0.04 | −83.8% | — | $11B | — |
| FCEL Electrical Equipment & PartsFuelCell Energy, Inc. | 1/5 short0/2 long | −31.0% | −37.5% | +43.4% | +51.8% | +41.1% | −64.1% | −94.9% | 103% | -0.09 | −99.8% | — | $991M | — |
| GEV Industrial - MachineryGE Vernova Inc. | 1/5 short0/2 long | −5.9% | −17.5% | −10.0% | +31.3% | +50.1% | — | — | — | — | −38.3% | — | $237B | — |
| NXT SolarNextpower Inc. | 1/5 short0/2 long | −5.0% | −21.2% | −25.8% | −14.8% | −11.0% | +132% | — | — | — | −50.2% | — | $12B | — |
| VRT Electrical Equipment & PartsVertiv Holdings Co | 0/5 short0/2 long | −18.9% | −30.2% | −35.2% | +16.0% | +16.0% | +456% | +772% | 64.2% | 1.01 | −71.3% | — | $78B | — |
| EOSE Electrical Equipment & PartsEos Energy Enterprises, Inc. | 0/5 short0/2 long | −58.7% | −58.6% | −76.5% | −87.0% | −88.8% | +1.8% | −84.9% | 119% | 0.27 | −97.9% | — | $608M | — |
| BLDP Electrical Equipment & PartsBallard Power Systems Inc. | 0/5 short0/2 long | −32.0% | −45.5% | −52.4% | −43.7% | −58.5% | −54.7% | −90.9% | 69.5% | -0.35 | −97.5% | — | $455M | — |
| PLUG Electrical Equipment & PartsPlug Power Inc. | 0/5 short0/2 long | −33.0% | −34.3% | −56.5% | −37.2% | −58.8% | −77.0% | −95.7% | 94.3% | -0.21 | −99.0% | — | $2.0B | — |
| FLNC Renewable UtilitiesFluence Energy, Inc. | 0/5 short0/2 long | −19.8% | −58.5% | −53.0% | −74.2% | −67.9% | −67.2% | — | — | — | −90.4% | — | $1.2B | — |
How did BE do year by year?
This table shows each investment's total return in every full calendar year since 2019, along with where BE ranked among its popular alternatives each year. Annual results reveal how consistently each one kept pace with BE and how far its good and bad years diverged, detail that multiyear averages tend to smooth over.
Note: BE began trading on July 25, 2018, so the table starts with 2019, its first full calendar year, and cannot show how it fared during the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or four other sell-offs.
- BE finished ahead of the S&P 500 in four of its seven full calendar years, and ahead of it in each of the last two.
- Among its popular alternatives, APD came out ahead of BE most often, in four of the seven years both traded.
- Ranked against its popular alternatives each year, BE finished in the top quarter in three of seven years and in the bottom quarter in one. In 2025, it ranked 1 of 19.
Newest year first. Green marks a year in which the fund came out ahead of BE; gray means the two finished within a fraction of a point. The rank row places BE among the alternatives that traded the full year; dark green is the top quarter and red the bottom quarter.
| Investment | Years ahead of BE | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BE This pageBloom Energy Corporation | — | +291% | +50.1% | −22.6% | −12.8% | −23.5% | +284% | −25.1% |
| Rank among alternatives | Top quarter in 3 of 7 | 1 of 19 | 4 of 18 | 12 of 17 | 7 of 17 | 12 of 16 | 3 of 15 | 13 of 15 |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 3 of 7 | +17.7% | +24.9% | +26.2% | −18.2% | +28.7% | +18.3% | +31.2% |
| APD Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. | 4 of 7 | −12.7% | +8.1% | −8.9% | +3.9% | +13.8% | +18.8% | +50.0% |
| CAT Caterpillar Inc. | 4 of 7 | +60.3% | +24.7% | +25.9% | +18.6% | +16.0% | +27.0% | +19.5% |
| ETN Eaton Corporation plc | 4 of 7 | −2.8% | +39.5% | +56.2% | −7.2% | +46.7% | +31.0% | +42.8% |
| CMI Cummins Inc. | 4 of 7 | +49.4% | +48.9% | +1.7% | +14.1% | −1.7% | +30.5% | +38.0% |
| LIN Linde plc | 4 of 7 | +3.2% | +3.2% | +27.7% | −4.4% | +33.4% | +25.9% | +39.1% |
| AMSC American Superconductor Corporation | 2 of 7 | +16.9% | +121% | +203% | −66.2% | −53.5% | +198% | −29.6% |
| EQIX Equinix, Inc. | 3 of 7 | −16.9% | +19.4% | +25.4% | −21.1% | +20.3% | +24.2% | +68.9% |
| DLR Digital Realty Trust, Inc. | 3 of 7 | −10.1% | +35.9% | +39.9% | −41.0% | +30.7% | +20.4% | +16.5% |
| NEE NextEra Energy, Inc. | 3 of 7 | +15.5% | +21.5% | −25.3% | −8.5% | +23.4% | +30.0% | +42.6% |
| GNRC Generac Holdings Inc. | 3 of 7 | −12.0% | +20.0% | +28.4% | −71.4% | +54.8% | +126% | +102% |
| FCEL FuelCell Energy, Inc. | 1 of 7 | −19.1% | −81.2% | −42.4% | −46.5% | −53.4% | +345% | −62.0% |
| GEV GE Vernova Inc. | 0 of 1 | +99.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| NXT Nextpower Inc. | 0 of 2 | +138% | −22.0% | — | — | — | — | — |
| VRT Vertiv Holdings Co | 4 of 7 | +42.8% | +137% | +252% | −45.3% | +33.8% | +69.4% | +12.5% |
| EOSE Eos Energy Enterprises, Inc. | 1 of 5 | +136% | +346% | −26.4% | −80.3% | −63.9% | — | — |
| BLDP Ballard Power Systems Inc. | 1 of 7 | +53.0% | −55.1% | −22.8% | −61.9% | −46.3% | +226% | +200% |
| PLUG Plug Power Inc. | 3 of 7 | −7.5% | −52.7% | −63.6% | −56.2% | −16.8% | +973% | +155% |
| FLNC Fluence Energy, Inc. | 1 of 4 | +24.6% | −33.4% | +39.1% | −51.8% | — | — | — |
Risk and diversification
How BE has fallen, how it held up in crashes beside the S&P 500 and its popular alternatives, and what moves independently of it.
What were BE's worst declines?
A drawdown is the decline from a peak to the lowest point before a new high. This section presents BE's five deepest drawdowns since it began trading in 2018, alongside the S&P 500's return over the same dates, and how long each took to recover. Together, these figures show how much an investor could have lost and how long it took to get back to even.
Note: BE began trading on July 25, 2018, so this list cannot include the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or four other sell-offs. The crash tests on this page show how older funds and the S&P 500 fared through those years.
- In all five of BE's worst declines, the S&P 500 held up better over the same dates.
- Not every decline was the market's doing: BE fell 92.5% from September 2018 to October 2019, while the S&P 500 rose 5.7%.
- The longest climb back to a previous high took 18 months, after BE fell 79.9% from February 2021 to February 2024.
Green means BE fell less than the S&P 500 over the same dates. Based on daily closing prices with dividends reinvested.
| During | BE fell | S&P 500, same dates | Peak | Low | Time to the low | Back at the peak | Time to recover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Late-2018 sell-off | −92.5% | +5.7% | Sep 2018 | Oct 2019 | 13 months | Jan 2021 | 15 months |
| 2022 bear market | −79.9% | +35.9% | Feb 2021 | Feb 2024 | 3 years | Aug 2025 | 18 months |
| No named crash | −52.6% | −2.0% | Jun 2026 | Jul 2026 | 1 month | Not yet | — |
| No named crash | −45.9% | −1.8% | Nov 2025 | Dec 2025 | 1 month | Jan 2026 | 1 month |
| No named crash | −31.6% | −8.6% | Feb 2026 | Mar 2026 | 1 month | Apr 2026 | 1 month |
How did BE do in stock market crashes?
This section measures how far BE, the S&P 500 and each alternative fell from peak to trough during every major market crash since 2000. A smaller decline means an investment held up better, and comparing results across crashes shows whether that resilience was consistent or a one-off.
Note: BE began trading on July 25, 2018, so its row reads "Not yet trading" for the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or four other sell-offs. The older alternatives and the S&P 500 show how those crashes played out.
- BE fell further than the S&P 500 in all four crashes it has traded through. The clearest case was the late-2018 sell-off, when BE fell 72.4% and the S&P 500 fell 19.3%.
- Among its popular alternatives, APD held up best, falling less than BE in all four crashes they both traded through.
- BE began trading after the 2008 financial crisis, but 12 of its popular alternatives lived through it. The mildest fall among them was NEE's 47.9%, against 55.2% for the S&P 500.
Newest crash first. Each figure is the fund's deepest fall within the crash window; green means a smaller fall than BE.
| Investment | Held up better | 2023 regional bank crisisMar 2023 | 2022 bear marketJan 2022 | Covid crashFeb 2020 | Late-2018 sell-offSep 2018 | February 2018 volatility shockFeb 2018 | 2015 China and oil sell-offAug 2015 | 2011 euro debt crisisJul 2011 | 2010 flash crashMay 2010 | 2008 financial crisisOct 2007 | Dot-com bustMar 2000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BE This pageBloom Energy Corporation | — | −10.7% | −53.7% | −78.2% | −72.4% | Not yet trading | Not yet trading | Not yet trading | Not yet trading | Not yet trading | Not yet trading |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 4 of 4 | −3.4% | −24.5% | −33.7% | −19.3% | −6.5% | −12.8% | −17.9% | −1.5% | −55.2% | −47.5% |
| APD Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. | 4 of 4 | −3.1% | −28.3% | −30.9% | −12.5% | −6.2% | −20.6% | −19.0% | −1.8% | −60.3% | −30.0% |
| CAT Caterpillar Inc. | 4 of 4 | −9.7% | −30.1% | −33.1% | −28.5% | −7.3% | −26.0% | −33.2% | −2.2% | −73.3% | −42.5% |
| ETN Eaton Corporation plc | 4 of 4 | −4.5% | −26.3% | −44.5% | −26.0% | −6.7% | −22.3% | −34.6% | −1.4% | −68.5% | −31.6% |
| CMI Cummins Inc. | 4 of 4 | −7.9% | −20.7% | −38.6% | −17.7% | −11.0% | −35.1% | −27.6% | −2.9% | −75.7% | −60.2% |
| LIN Linde plc | 4 of 4 | −5.3% | −22.8% | −32.3% | −11.9% | −7.2% | −16.6% | −15.4% | −0.6% | −51.8% | −33.5% |
| AMSC American Superconductor Corporation | 2 of 4 | −13.7% | −64.7% | −44.2% | −25.8% | −15.1% | −31.9% | −56.8% | −3.1% | −80.6% | −96.3% |
| EQIX Equinix, Inc. | 4 of 4 | −4.1% | −36.3% | −25.1% | −22.8% | −6.3% | −15.8% | −22.5% | −1.1% | −69.9% | — |
| DLR Digital Realty Trust, Inc. | 4 of 4 | −3.1% | −45.7% | −24.1% | −14.6% | −8.1% | −8.4% | −20.2% | −1.7% | −56.8% | — |
| NEE NextEra Energy, Inc. | 4 of 4 | −1.7% | −24.0% | −35.6% | −8.2% | −6.9% | −12.9% | −12.8% | 0.0% | −47.9% | −32.2% |
| GNRC Generac Holdings Inc. | 3 of 4 | −6.8% | −54.8% | −33.1% | −21.8% | −5.6% | −16.2% | −24.4% | −4.0% | — | — |
| FCEL FuelCell Energy, Inc. | 3 of 4 | −7.7% | −57.6% | −60.9% | −57.6% | −7.2% | −59.2% | −42.5% | −5.6% | −84.6% | −91.1% |
| NXT Nextpower Inc. | 1 of 1 | −4.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| VRT Vertiv Holdings Co | 2 of 4 | −12.2% | −65.7% | −58.6% | −3.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EOSE Eos Energy Enterprises, Inc. | 1 of 2 | −5.9% | −84.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| BLDP Ballard Power Systems Inc. | 3 of 4 | −8.8% | −55.4% | −48.2% | −48.2% | −8.3% | −31.6% | −28.1% | −2.3% | −84.7% | −94.7% |
| PLUG Plug Power Inc. | 2 of 4 | −10.4% | −57.6% | −51.7% | −48.7% | −14.1% | −47.6% | −40.9% | 0.0% | −84.5% | −97.7% |
| FLNC Fluence Energy, Inc. | 0 of 2 | −11.2% | −81.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
How closely does BE move with the S&P 500?
Upside capture measures how much of the S&P 500's gains an investment kept in the months the market rose, and downside capture how much of its losses it took in the months the market fell. An investment that captures more of the gains than the losses has compounded ahead of the market over time. This section compares BE with its popular alternatives on both measures, and on beta (how strongly each has moved with the market), over the past 5 years.
- Over the past 5 years, BE captured 305% of the S&P 500's gains in rising months and 191% of its losses in falling months, with a beta of 3.79. It amplified the market's moves in both directions.
- Only VRT and ETN had a higher capture ratio (upside capture divided by downside capture) than BE's 1.60, out of 15 popular alternatives with the same record.
Monthly total returns over the past 5 years, measured against SPY. 100% capture or a beta of 1.00 means moving in line with the S&P 500. Green marks a better figure than BE's: more upside, less downside or a higher capture ratio. Sorted by capture ratio.
| Investment | Upside capture | Downside capture | Capture ratio | Beta |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BE This pageBloom Energy Corporation | 305% | 191% | 1.60 | 3.79 |
| VRT Vertiv Holdings Co | 205% | 75% | 2.73 | 2.03 |
| ETN Eaton Corporation plc | 104% | 47% | 2.24 | 1.13 |
| CAT Caterpillar Inc. | 169% | 111% | 1.53 | 1.58 |
| LIN Linde plc | 71% | 60% | 1.17 | 0.70 |
| CMI Cummins Inc. | 136% | 124% | 1.09 | 1.24 |
| DLR Digital Realty Trust, Inc. | 78% | 95% | 0.82 | 0.99 |
| EQIX Equinix, Inc. | 79% | 100% | 0.79 | 0.98 |
| AMSC American Superconductor Corporation | 230% | 306% | 0.75 | 3.32 |
| APD Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. | 78% | 116% | 0.68 | 0.76 |
| NEE NextEra Energy, Inc. | 63% | 102% | 0.62 | 0.65 |
| GNRC Generac Holdings Inc. | 80% | 223% | 0.36 | 1.91 |
| EOSE Eos Energy Enterprises, Inc. | 130% | 397% | 0.33 | 2.84 |
| PLUG Plug Power Inc. | 61% | 404% | 0.15 | 2.29 |
| BLDP Ballard Power Systems Inc. | 39% | 299% | 0.13 | 2.27 |
| FCEL FuelCell Energy, Inc. | -15% | 274% | -0.05 | 2.44 |
What diversifies BE?
Correlation measures how closely two investments move together, on a scale from 1 (in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to -1 (in opposite directions). This section lists large ETFs and stocks whose returns have had a low correlation with BE's. Because such investments tend not to fall at the same time, pairing BE with them can reduce a portfolio's overall swings.
- Moving a fifth of the money in BE into LVHI would have cut the portfolio's volatility by 20% over the past 5 years for a small cut in its annual return (+71.4% for BE alone, +70.4% for the mix).
- DXJ made money in four of the four calendar years in which BE lost money.
- Among large ETFs, LVHI, DXJ and EMLP have moved largely independently of BE over the past 5 years, with correlations of 0.44 or lower, and each still earned a positive 5-year return.
Only ETFs with at least $1.0B in assets and stocks worth at least $10B, with a correlation below 0.5 over the past 5 years and a positive return, are included, ranked by Sharpe ratio; funds that hold the same thing are shown once. The year columns are the years in which BE lost money. The last two columns show a portfolio that is 80% BE and 20% the other investment, rebalanced monthly.
ETFs
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2019 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BE Bloom Energy Corporation (this page) | 1.00 | +965% | 0.96 | −22.6% | −12.8% | −23.5% | −25.1% | 130% | +71.4% |
| LVHI InternationalFranklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 0.17 | +119% | 1.48 | +17.4% | +3.8% | +17.8% | +17.8% | 105% | +70.4% |
| DXJ InternationalWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund | 0.13 | +225% | 1.34 | +42.0% | +6.0% | +18.0% | +18.9% | 105% | +73.3% |
| EMLP Broad MarketFirst Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund | 0.44 | +101% | 1.04 | +8.0% | +10.4% | +23.1% | +23.4% | 106% | +69.2% |
| HDV Dividend & IncomeiShares Core High Dividend ETF | 0.21 | +83.3% | 1.00 | +1.8% | +7.1% | +19.6% | +20.1% | 105% | +68.8% |
| SMH TechnologyVanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.40 | +323% | 0.97 | +73.4% | −33.5% | +42.1% | +64.5% | 107% | +73.9% |
| DBEF InternationalXtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF | 0.29 | +85.0% | 0.96 | +20.1% | −5.1% | +19.6% | +24.9% | 105% | +69.0% |
| GLD CommoditiesSPDR Gold Shares | 0.08 | +126% | 0.96 | +12.7% | −0.8% | −4.2% | +17.9% | 105% | +71.0% |
| SPMO Broad MarketInvesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 0.40 | +136% | 0.93 | +17.6% | −10.4% | +22.7% | +25.9% | 106% | +70.5% |
Stocks
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2019 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BE Bloom Energy Corporation (this page) | 1.00 | +965% | 0.96 | −22.6% | −12.8% | −23.5% | −25.1% | 130% | +71.4% |
| CAH Medical - DistributionCardinal Health, Inc. | 0.14 | +479% | 1.55 | +34.1% | +54.1% | −0.4% | +18.0% | 105% | +76.3% |
| CLS Hardware, Equipment & PartsCelestica Inc. | 0.41 | +3,143% | 1.47 | +160% | +1.3% | +37.9% | −5.7% | 110% | +90.3% |
| FIX Engineering & ConstructionComfort Systems USA, Inc. | 0.49 | +1,636% | 1.46 | +79.6% | +17.0% | +89.0% | +15.1% | 109% | +85.0% |
| MCK Medical - DistributionMcKesson Corporation | 0.25 | +413% | 1.44 | +24.1% | +51.8% | +44.2% | +26.7% | 106% | +75.5% |
| MPC Oil & Gas Refining & MarketingMarathon Petroleum Corporation | 0.16 | +690% | 1.41 | +30.4% | +86.6% | +61.0% | +6.0% | 106% | +79.0% |
Common questions
What was BE's worst drawdown?
BE's deepest decline since it began trading in 2018 was 92.5%, from September 2018 to October 2019. It took 15 months from the low to climb back to its old high. Because BE launched in July 2018, that record does not include the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or four other sell-offs.
What were BE's best and worst years?
Over seven full calendar years, BE's best year was 2025, when it returned 291%. Its worst was 2019, with a return of -25.1%.
Is there a better investment than BE?
Looking beyond its popular alternatives, FIX (engineering & construction) and STRL (engineering & construction) earned more than BE with less volatility over the past 5 years. FIX returned 77.0% a year at 46.7% volatility, against 60.5% a year at 89.6%. Few investments have done better on both counts: only nine of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than BE with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them MU, FIX and CLS.
Is BE more volatile than the S&P 500?
Yes. BE's volatility over the past 5 years was 89.6%, 5.2 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, BE's return lands within 89.6% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump.
What is BE's Sharpe ratio?
BE's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.96, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so BE earned more for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings.
How correlated is BE with the S&P 500?
Over the past 5 years, BE's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.46 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They often move together: some diversification next to an index fund, but not a cushion. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against BE instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a BE holding.
What are the best alternatives to BE?
None of the 18 popular alternatives we compared outperformed BE in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 2 long-term timeframes, which says more about BE's strength than about its alternatives.
Did BE outperform the S&P 500?
BE finished ahead of the S&P 500 (SPY) in four of seven full calendar years. In 2025, it returned +291%, against +17.7% for the index.
How did BE do in stock market crashes?
BE fell less than the S&P 500 (SPY) in none of the four major crashes it has traded through, and further in four. The clearest case was the late-2018 sell-off, when BE fell 72.4% and the S&P 500 fell 19.3%.
What diversifies BE?
These had a low correlation with BE over the past 5 years and still earned a positive 5-year return: among large ETFs, LVHI (correlation 0.17), DXJ (correlation 0.13) and EMLP (correlation 0.44); among large stocks, CAH (correlation 0.14), CLS (correlation 0.41) and FIX (correlation 0.49). A correlation near zero means the two have moved largely independently.
How we measure
- Short-term periods are 1M, 3M, 6M, YTD, 1Y; long-term periods are 3Y, 5Y. An investment outperformed in a period when its total return, with dividends reinvested, was higher than BE's. Returns within 0.5 points or 3% of BE's, whichever is larger, count as a tie.
- "Qualified" means outperforming in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 2 long-term periods. "All-weather" means outperforming in every long-term period and all but one short-term period.
- Popular alternatives are the funds and stocks most often compared with this one. We include only those that trade today, are not leveraged or inverse, and hold at least $200 million.
- Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily returns over 5 years, a measure of how much the price typically swings in a year. The Sharpe ratio is the return above cash for each unit of that volatility.
- A decline, or drawdown, runs from a peak to the lowest close before the next high. The worst decline ever uses all the price history we have; comparisons between funds use the past 10 years so that younger funds are judged on the same stretch.
- Sector overlap is the share of assets two funds hold in the same sectors. Correlation and the mixed-portfolio figures use monthly returns.
- Upside and downside capture follow Morningstar's definition: the compound monthly return in the months the S&P 500 rose (or fell), divided by the S&P 500's compound return in those months. Beta measures how strongly monthly returns have moved with the S&P 500. All three use the same window for every investment.
- Figures are computed from daily adjusted prices and update after each trading day. Past performance does not predict future results.
More research
Popular alternatives to BE
APDAir Products and Chemicals
CATCaterpillar
ETNEaton
CMICummins
LINLinde
EQIXEquinix
DLRDigital Realty Trust
NEENextEra Energy
GEVGE Vernova
VRTVertiv