Relative Intelligence · Cruise Lines

How Viking (VIK) compares with the whole market and its popular alternatives
Built by QuantCommons' quantitative engine, this page is about relative opportunity, not data on VIK alone. It places VIK (Viking Holdings Ltd) against 9 popular alternatives, its neighboring categories and the entire market of over 10,000 U.S.-listed stocks and ETFs, and surfaces what has done better on consistent outperformance, return for the risk taken and diversification. The result is a clearer view of where VIK stands in the market, and of the alternatives worth a closer look.
Period covered: VIK's full trading record, from May 2024 through September 2026. All returns include reinvested dividends. Data as of October 20, 2026.
Data as of October 20, 2026. Full tables and charts read best on a larger screen.
On this page6 sections
Key findings
- Right nowVIK has gone against the market, falling 10.0% over the past 3 months while the S&P 500 rose 3.9%. Not every peer went the same way. Over the past 3 months, LIND (Lindblad Expeditions) rose 28.4% and NCLH (Norwegian Cruise Line) fell 19.7%. Consistency ↓
- Stock or market?The weakness is VIK's own: it fell 10.0% over the past 3 months while the cruise lines ETF PEJ (Invesco Dynamic Leisure and Entertainment ETF) rose 1.1%. The S&P 500 rose 3.9%. Its cruise line peers did not move as one over the past 3 months: LIND (Lindblad Expeditions) rose 28.4%, while NCLH (Norwegian Cruise Line) fell 19.7%.
- Past 1 to 3 yearsOver the past year, VIK rose 43.5% against 15.8% for the S&P 500 and 17.9% for the Nasdaq 100.
How much would $10,000 in VIK have grown?
This chart tracks a hypothetical $10,000 investment in VIK over the past 2 years, with dividends reinvested, alongside the same amount in the S&P 500, investments that ended ahead of VIK over the same span and VIK's popular alternatives, among those that traded for the entire period. It shows not only where each investment ended up but also how smooth or uneven the path was.
Note: VIK began trading on May 1, 2024, so the chart cannot reach back to the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or eight other sell-offs. It covers the most recent 2 years of VIK's record, starting at the end of September 2024.
- $10,000 invested in VIK at the end of September 2024 would have grown to $22,450 by September 2026, more than the $13,598 it would have become in SPY, an S&P 500 fund.
- Five of the eight other investments on the chart ended ahead of VIK, and MU finished highest, at $103,342.
From the end of September 2024 to the end of September 2026. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 362 of the 4,103 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of VIK; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- MU$103,342+933% total · +221% a year
- INTC$51,248+412% total · +126% a year
- AMD$37,284+273% total · +93.1% a year
- LIND$33,977+240% total · +84.3% a year
- TSM$26,847+168% total · +63.9% a year
- VIK$22,450+125% total · +49.8% a year
- MAR$14,565+45.6% total · +20.7% a year
- HLT$13,861+38.6% total · +17.7% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$13,598+36.0% total · +16.6% a year
- ABNB$12,668+26.7% total · +12.6% a year
VIK at a glance
This section summarizes the key facts about the stock, its returns over periods from one to ten years and the risk it has carried, with dividends reinvested throughout. These figures serve as the baseline for every comparison that follows.
Note: VIK began trading on May 1, 2024, so every figure here, including its worst decline, covers only the time since then. None of them reflect the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or eight other sell-offs.
- VIK's deepest decline since it began trading in 2024 was 35.4%, from February to April 2025. It took two months from the low to climb back to its old high.
- VIK is 19.4% below its all-time high.
The company
- Market value
- $39B
- Industry
- Travel Services
- Price history from
- May 2024
Returns
- Past 1 year
- +43.5%total return
- Best calendar year
- +62.1%2025
- Worst calendar year
- +62.1%2025
- Losing years
- 0 of 1full calendar years
Risk
- Volatility
- 40.2%typical yearly swing, 1 year
- Sharpe ratio
- 1.10return per unit of risk, 1 year
- Worst decline ever
- −35.4%Feb 2025 to Apr 2025
- From its all-time high
- −19.4%below the peak
VIK against the whole market
Where VIK ranks among every stock and fund, and what across the market has done better.
How does VIK rank among all stocks?
This section ranks VIK on return, volatility, risk-adjusted return and worst decline against every stock worth at least $300 million with enough history. Where the comparisons with its popular alternatives show how VIK stacks up against its peers, these rankings show where it stands in the market as a whole.
- VIK's 1-year return ranks in the top 20% of the 3,287 stocks worth at least $300 million with 1 year of history.
Ranked against U.S.-listed stocks worth at least $300M that have enough history for each measure, so the count changes from row to row; smaller stocks are left out. Lower volatility and smaller declines rank higher.
| Measure | VIK | Rank | Standing |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +43.5% | 659 of 3,287 | top 20% |
| Volatility, 1 year | 40.2% | 1,646 of 3,287 | top 50% |
| Sharpe ratio, 1 year | 1.10 | 754 of 3,287 | top 23% |
VIK against its popular alternatives
The investments people most often weigh against VIK, compared period by period and year by year.
How do VIK's risk and return compare with its alternatives?
This map plots each investment's annual return over the past 1 year against its volatility, the size of its typical price swings. Investments toward the upper left earned more for a smoother ride, and those toward the lower right earned less for a rougher one. The dashed lines cross at VIK, which divides the map into what did better or worse on each measure.
- Only MAR was both more rewarding and calmer than VIK over the past 1 year, earning a higher annual return with lower volatility.
- Over the past 1 year, VIK returned 43.5% a year, more than the S&P 500's 15.8%, with higher volatility (40.2% against 12.7%).
Green points earned more than VIK with less volatility; red points earned less with more. Hover over a point for its figures. Total returns with dividends reinvested, annualized.
All figures
| Investment | Annual return | Volatility |
|---|---|---|
| LIND Lindblad Expeditions Holdings, Inc. | +195% | 51.3% |
| MAR Marriott International, Inc. | +54.1% | 27.2% |
| VIK This pageViking Holdings Ltd | +43.5% | 40.2% |
| ABNB Airbnb, Inc. | +39.1% | 36.0% |
| EXPE Expedia Group, Inc. | +38.8% | 50.8% |
| HLT Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. | +37.9% | 24.1% |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | +15.8% | 12.7% |
| RCL Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. | −3.1% | 48.1% |
| CCL Carnival Corporation & plc | −4.7% | 49.6% |
| BKNG Booking Holdings Inc. | −19.6% | 37.7% |
| NCLH Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. | −32.7% | 54.5% |
Has VIK consistently beaten its popular alternatives?
This section compares VIK with the investments people most often weigh against it, checking each one over five periods from one month to one year. Counting how often an alternative earned more than VIK helps separate lasting outperformance from a single strong stretch.
- Six of the nine popular alternatives, led by LIND, MAR and ABNB, outperformed VIK in at least 3 of 5 timeframes.
A green cell means the alternative earned more than VIK over that period. "Qualified" marks those that did so in at least 3 of 5 periods.
| Investment | Periods outperformed | Short term | Risk · 1 year | Fund | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1M | 3M | 6M | YTD | 1Y | Volatilitylower is calmer | Sharpehigher is better | Worst declinepast 10 years | Expense | Assets | Overlapsame sectors | ||
| VIK Viking Holdings Ltd (this page) | — | +1.4% | −10.0% | +1.3% | +20.7% | +43.5% | 40.2% | 1.10 | — | — | $39B | — |
| LIND QualifiedLindblad Expeditions Holdings, Inc. | 5/5 short | +25.3% | +28.4% | +75.1% | +145% | +195% | 51.3% | 2.38 | −83.2% | — | $2.3B | — |
| MAR QualifiedMarriott International, Inc. | 5/5 short | +15.9% | +8.5% | +5.3% | +27.5% | +54.1% | 27.2% | 1.73 | −61.3% | — | $104B | — |
| ABNB QualifiedAirbnb, Inc. | 4/5 short | +6.1% | +22.1% | +23.2% | +33.0% | +39.1% | 36.0% | 1.10 | −62.0% | — | $106B | — |
| HLT QualifiedHilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. | 4/5 short | +17.0% | +11.1% | +4.9% | +22.8% | +37.9% | 24.1% | 1.46 | −50.8% | — | $81B | — |
| EXPE QualifiedExpedia Group, Inc. | 3/5 short | +7.0% | +13.6% | +10.5% | +6.9% | +38.8% | 50.8% | 0.90 | −70.5% | — | $34B | — |
| RCL QualifiedRoyal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. | 3/5 short | +15.0% | +1.2% | +3.1% | +3.3% | −3.1% | 48.1% | 0.17 | −83.3% | — | $77B | — |
| CCL Travel ServicesCarnival Corporation & plc | 2/5 short | +21.3% | +4.5% | −5.6% | −11.1% | −4.7% | 49.6% | 0.15 | −90.4% | — | $36B | — |
| BKNG Travel ServicesBooking Holdings Inc. | 1/5 short | −2.7% | −8.4% | −14.2% | −22.5% | −19.6% | 37.7% | -0.39 | −47.8% | — | $123B | — |
| NCLH Travel ServicesNorwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. | 1/5 short | +9.9% | −19.7% | −22.8% | −31.3% | −32.7% | 54.5% | -0.46 | −87.3% | — | $7.2B | — |
Risk and diversification
How VIK has fallen, how it held up in crashes beside the S&P 500 and its popular alternatives, and what moves independently of it.
What were VIK's worst declines?
A drawdown is the decline from a peak to the lowest point before a new high. This section presents VIK's five deepest drawdowns since it began trading in 2024, alongside the S&P 500's return over the same dates, and how long each took to recover. Together, these figures show how much an investor could have lost and how long it took to get back to even.
Note: VIK began trading on May 1, 2024, so this list cannot include the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or eight other sell-offs.
- In all five of VIK's worst declines, the S&P 500 held up better over the same dates.
- Not every decline was the market's doing: VIK fell 27.8% from August to October 2026, while the S&P 500 slipped only 0.5%.
- None of these declines kept VIK below its old high for long; the longest climb back took two months.
Green means VIK fell less than the S&P 500 over the same dates. Based on daily closing prices with dividends reinvested.
| During | VIK fell | S&P 500, same dates | Peak | Low | Time to the low | Back at the peak | Time to recover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No named crash | −35.4% | −16.6% | Feb 2025 | Apr 2025 | 2 months | Jun 2025 | 2 months |
| No named crash | −27.8% | −0.5% | Aug 2026 | Oct 2026 | 2 months | Not yet | — |
| No named crash | −15.5% | 0.0% | Jul 2024 | Sep 2024 | 2 months | Oct 2024 | 1 month |
| No named crash | −14.9% | −3.4% | Feb 2026 | Mar 2026 | 1 month | Apr 2026 | 1 month |
| No named crash | −12.6% | +3.0% | Sep 2025 | Nov 2025 | 2 months | Nov 2025 | Under a month |
Common questions
What was VIK's worst drawdown?
VIK's deepest decline since it began trading in 2024 was 35.4%, from February to April 2025. It took two months from the low to climb back to its old high. Because VIK launched in May 2024, that record does not include the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or eight other sell-offs.
What were VIK's best and worst years?
Over one full calendar years, VIK's best year was 2025, when it returned 62.1%. Its worst was 2025, with a return of +62.1%.
What are the best alternatives to VIK?
Of the nine popular alternatives we compared, six outperformed VIK in at least 3 of 5 timeframes, with dividends reinvested: LIND, MAR and ABNB.
How we measure
- Short-term periods are 1M, 3M, 6M, YTD, 1Y. An investment outperformed in a period when its total return, with dividends reinvested, was higher than VIK's. Returns within 0.5 points or 3% of VIK's, whichever is larger, count as a tie.
- "Qualified" means outperforming in at least 3 of 5 periods. "All-weather" means outperforming in every long-term period and all but one short-term period.
- Popular alternatives are the funds and stocks most often compared with this one. We include only those that trade today, are not leveraged or inverse, and hold at least $200 million.
- Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily returns over 1 year, a measure of how much the price typically swings in a year. The Sharpe ratio is the return above cash for each unit of that volatility.
- A decline, or drawdown, runs from a peak to the lowest close before the next high. The worst decline ever uses all the price history we have; comparisons between funds use the past 10 years so that younger funds are judged on the same stretch.
- Sector overlap is the share of assets two funds hold in the same sectors. Correlation and the mixed-portfolio figures use monthly returns.
- Figures are computed from daily adjusted prices and update after each trading day. Past performance does not predict future results.