# How Exxonmobil (XOM) compares with the whole market and its popular alternatives

> Source: EasyCompare research, https://easycompare.io/research/xom
> Data as of October 20, 2026. Total returns include reinvested dividends. Past performance does not predict future results; nothing here is investment advice.

Built by QuantCommons' quantitative engine, this page is about relative opportunity, not data on XOM alone. It places XOM (Exxonmobil Holdings Corporation) against 16 popular alternatives, its neighboring categories and the entire market of over 10,000 U.S.-listed stocks and ETFs, and surfaces what has done better on consistent outperformance, return for the risk taken, behavior in real market crashes and diversification. The result is a clearer view of where XOM stands in the market, and of the alternatives worth a closer look.

Period covered: XOM's full trading record, from October 1986 through September 2026. All returns include reinvested dividends. Data as of October 20, 2026.

## Key findings

- **Right now:** XOM has run far ahead of the market, rising 20.7% over the past 3 months against 3.9% for the S&P 500 and 3.2% for the Nasdaq 100. Its integrated oil & gas peers were far apart over the past 3 months, from PBR (Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. - Petrobras, up 45.4%) to TTE (TotalEnergies, up 12.8%).
- **Stock or market?:** XOM's 20.7% gain over the past 3 months is part of a broader integrated oil & gas rally: the integrated oil & gas ETF XLE (State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF) rose 18.0%, with CVX (Chevron, up 20.0%) and SHEL (Shell, up 23.5%). XOM rose 12.4% last month as the S&P 500 fell 0.6% and the Nasdaq 100 fell 3.2%.
- **Past 1 to 3 years:** Over the past year, XOM rose 62.4% against 15.8% for the S&P 500 and 17.9% for the Nasdaq 100.
- **Long term:** XOM turned $10,000 into $31,400 over the past decade, against $42,100 in the S&P 500. On the flip side, the past 5 years have been the better stretch: XOM rose 232% against 81.7% for the S&P 500, after trailing over the decade.
- **In a crash:** XOM fell further than the S&P 500 in four of the last five sell-offs, including the Covid crash (47.9% against 33.7%). On the flip side, in the 2022 bear market, XOM held up better than its integrated oil & gas peers, including CVX (Chevron), SHEL and TTE.
- **Diversification:** XOM is a real diversifier: a correlation of 0.13 with the S&P 500 over 5 years and 0.11 with the total US market, less closely than 93% of stocks worth at least $300 million. XOM moves far less with the S&P 500 than it used to, with a correlation of 0.13 over the past 5 years against 0.70 in the 5 years before.
- **Better options**
  - **Popular alternatives:** MPC (Marathon Petroleum), YPF (YPF Sociedad Anónima) and PBR (Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. - Petrobras) were ahead of XOM in most short and long periods, though with much bigger swings (33.4%, 54.1% and 37.5% volatility against 26.5%).
  - **Nearby categories and themes:** PBR-A (Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. - Petrobras, integrated oil & gas) and VLO (Valero Energy, oil & gas) were ahead of XOM in most short and long periods, though with much bigger swings (37.5% and 36.9% volatility against 26.5%).
  - **Whole market:** Few investments have done better on both counts: only three of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than XOM with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them MCK (McKesson), CAH (Cardinal Health) and EPU (iShares MSCI Peru and Global Exposure ETF).

## How much would $10,000 in XOM have grown?

This chart tracks a hypothetical $10,000 investment in XOM over the past 29 years, with dividends reinvested, alongside the same amount in the S&P 500, investments that ended ahead of XOM over the same span and XOM's popular alternatives, among those that traded for the entire period.

- $10,000 invested in XOM at the end of September 1997 would have grown to $124,235 by September 2026, less than the $132,907 it would have become in SPY, an S&P 500 fund.
- Five of the eight other investments on the chart ended ahead of XOM, and WMB finished highest, at $472,016.

## XOM at a glance

This section summarizes the key facts about the stock, its returns over periods from one to ten years and the risk it has carried, with dividends reinvested throughout.

- XOM's deepest decline since it began trading in 1986 was 62.4%, from June 2014 to March 2020. It took 22 months from the low to climb back to its old high.
- XOM is trading within 1% of its all-time high.
- Over 29 full calendar years, XOM's best was 2022, when it returned 87.4%, and its worst was 2020, when it lost 36.2%. It lost money in ten of those years.

- Type: Stock, Energy (Oil & Gas Integrated)
- Trading since: October 17, 1986
- Market value: $731B
- Volatility (5 years): 26.5%; Sharpe ratio: 1.04
- Worst decline ever: −62.4%, from June 23, 2014 to March 23, 2020; back at its high by January 25, 2022

| Period | XOM total return |
| --- | --- |
| 1 month | +12.4% |
| 3 months | +20.7% |
| 6 months | +22.0% |
| year to date | +47.9% |
| 1 year | +62.4% |
| 3 years | +76.7% |
| 5 years | +232% |
| 10 years | +214% |

## XOM against the whole market

Where XOM ranks among every stock and fund, and what across the market has done better.

### How does XOM rank among all stocks?

This section ranks XOM on return, volatility, risk-adjusted return and worst decline against every stock worth at least $300 million with enough history.

- On return for the risk taken (the Sharpe ratio), XOM ranks in the top 3% of the 2,893 stocks worth at least $300 million.

| Measure | XOM | Rank |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1-year return | +62.4% | 392 of 3,287 (top 12%) |
| 3-year return | +76.7% | 1,169 of 3,017 (top 39%) |
| 5-year return | +232% | 252 of 2,893 (top 9%) |
| 10-year return | +214% | 809 of 2,202 (top 37%) |
| Volatility, 5 years | 26.5% | 446 of 2,893 (top 16%) |
| Sharpe ratio, 5 years | 1.04 | 75 of 2,893 (top 3%) |
| Worst decline, past 10 years | −61.0% | 920 of 2,187 (top 43%) |

### What has beaten XOM on both return and risk?

Each dot is an investment, placed by how much it earned a year over the past 5 years (higher is better) and how much its price swung, its volatility (further left is calmer).

- Two stocks and one ETF worth at least $500 million sit in the green region: each earned more than XOM over the past 5 years with smaller price swings. That is fewer than 1% of the 3,633 screened. Few investments beat it on both counts.
- Among those with at least half XOM's swings, CAH has the best return for its risk: 42.1% a year at 24.7% volatility, 7% less than XOM's 26.5%, and a Sharpe ratio (return above cash per unit of volatility) of 1.55 against 1.04 for XOM.

### Is there a better investment than XOM?

The table below lists investments that beat XOM over the past 5 years on at least one of these measures: a higher annual return with lower volatility, a higher annual return at similar volatility, a similar return with lower volatility, a higher Sharpe ratio with a smaller worst decline, a higher total return in most periods from 3 months to 10 years, or smaller losses in recent market crashes.

- Among XOM's popular alternatives, MPC, YPF and PBR were ahead of XOM in most short and long periods, though with much bigger swings (33.4%, 54.1% and 37.5% volatility against 26.5%).
- Looking beyond its popular alternatives, PBR-A (integrated oil & gas) and VLO (oil & gas) were ahead of XOM in most short and long periods, though with much bigger swings (37.5% and 36.9% volatility against 26.5%).
- Few investments have done better on both counts: only three of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than XOM with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them MCK, CAH and EPU.

The 3 strongest of 3 investments that beat XOM over the past 5 years, out of 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million.

| Investment | Group | Annual return (5 years) | Volatility | Sharpe | Worst decline (10 years) | 10Y return | Correlation with XOM | Better on |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| XOM: Exxonmobil Holdings Corporation (this page) |  | +27.1% | 26.5% | 1.04 | −61.0% | +214% |  |  |
| [CAH](https://easycompare.io/research/cah): Cardinal Health, Inc. | Health Care Distribution | +42.1% | 24.7% | 1.55 | −46.1% | +349% | 0.13 | Higher return, lower volatility; Higher Sharpe, smaller worst decline |
| [MCK](https://easycompare.io/research/mck): McKesson Corporation | Health Care Distribution | +38.7% | 25.0% | 1.44 | −38.1% | +586% | 0.29 | Higher return, lower volatility; Higher Sharpe, smaller worst decline |
| EPU: iShares MSCI Peru and Global Exposure ETF | International | +29.5% | 24.9% | 1.17 | −51.0% | +275% | 0.37 | Higher return, lower volatility; Higher Sharpe, smaller worst decline |

## XOM against its popular alternatives

The investments people most often weigh against XOM, compared period by period and year by year.

### How do XOM's risk and return compare with its alternatives?

This map plots each investment's annual return over the past 5 years against its volatility, the size of its typical price swings.

- None of the 16 popular alternatives earned more than XOM over the past 5 years with smaller price swings, so every higher return on the map came with a bumpier ride.
- Over the past 5 years, XOM returned 27.1% a year, more than the S&P 500's 12.7%, with higher volatility (26.5% against 17.1%).

### Has XOM consistently beaten its popular alternatives?

This section compares XOM with the investments people most often weigh against it, checking each one over eight periods from one month to ten years.

- Four of the 16 popular alternatives, led by MPC, PBR and SU, outperformed XOM in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes.
- MPC, PBR and SU outperformed XOM in every long-term period and in all but one short-term period, the most consistent record in the group.

| Investment | 1Y return | 3Y return | 5Y return | 10Y return | Periods ahead of XOM | Verdict | Sharpe |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| XOM: Exxonmobil Holdings Corporation (this page) | +62.4% | +76.7% | +232% | +214% |  |  | 1.04 |
| [MPC](https://easycompare.io/research/mpc): Marathon Petroleum Corporation | +159% | +234% | +690% | +1,387% | 5/5 short-term, 3/3 long-term | all-weather | 1.41 |
| [PBR](https://easycompare.io/research/pbr): Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. - Petrobras | +140% | +132% | +667% | +674% | 5/5 short-term, 3/3 long-term | all-weather | 1.28 |
| [SU](https://easycompare.io/research/su): Suncor Energy Inc. | +111% | +161% | +318% | +295% | 5/5 short-term, 3/3 long-term | all-weather | 1.05 |
| EC: Ecopetrol S.A. | +112% | +116% | +129% | +401% | 3/5 short-term, 2/3 long-term | consistent | 0.63 |
| [E](https://easycompare.io/research/e): Eni S.p.A. | +77.9% | +120% | +181% | +278% | 2/5 short-term, 2/3 long-term |  | 0.94 |
| YPF: YPF Sociedad Anónima | +102% | +313% | +971% | +173% | 2/5 short-term, 2/3 long-term |  | 1.14 |
| [WMB](https://easycompare.io/research/wmb): The Williams Companies, Inc. | +14.9% | +125% | +200% | +288% | 0/5 short-term, 2/3 long-term |  | 1.04 |
| [COP](https://easycompare.io/research/cop): ConocoPhillips | +72.9% | +28.5% | +131% | +379% | 5/5 short-term, 1/3 long-term |  | 0.68 |
| [EQNR](https://easycompare.io/research/eqnr): Equinor ASA | +107% | +73.2% | +141% | +416% | 4/5 short-term, 1/3 long-term |  | 0.69 |
| [SHEL](https://easycompare.io/research/shel): Shell plc | +50.3% | +77.1% | +159% | +233% | 2/5 short-term, 1/3 long-term |  | 0.90 |
| [CVX](https://easycompare.io/research/cvx): Chevron Corporation | +51.9% | +53.4% | +144% | +238% | 1/5 short-term, 1/3 long-term |  | 0.84 |
| [TTE](https://easycompare.io/research/tte): TotalEnergies SE | +55.2% | +60.5% | +129% | +234% | 0/5 short-term, 1/3 long-term |  | 0.78 |
| [CVE](https://easycompare.io/research/cve): Cenovus Energy Inc. | +101% | +76.2% | +225% | +163% | 3/5 short-term, 0/3 long-term |  | 0.80 |
| [EOG](https://easycompare.io/research/eog): EOG Resources, Inc. | +53.1% | +31.9% | +115% | +131% | 2/5 short-term, 0/3 long-term |  | 0.64 |
| [BP](https://easycompare.io/research/bp): BP p.l.c. | +56.3% | +46.5% | +110% | +141% | 1/5 short-term, 0/3 long-term |  | 0.66 |
| [SLB](https://easycompare.io/research/slb): Slb N.V. | +53.2% | −7.2% | +60.7% | −21.3% | 0/5 short-term, 0/3 long-term |  | 0.44 |

### How did XOM do year by year?

This table shows each investment's total return in every full calendar year since 1997, along with where XOM ranked among its popular alternatives each year.

- XOM finished ahead of the S&P 500 in 12 of its 29 full calendar years, and behind it in each of the last three.
- Among its popular alternatives, MPC came out ahead of XOM most often, in ten of the 14 years both traded.
- Ranked against its popular alternatives each year, XOM finished in the top quarter in seven of 29 years and in the bottom quarter in five. In 2025, it ranked 8 of 17.

| Year | XOM | SPY |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2025 | +16.0% | +17.7% |
| 2024 | +11.3% | +24.9% |
| 2023 | −6.3% | +26.2% |
| 2022 | +87.4% | −18.2% |
| 2021 | +57.6% | +28.7% |
| 2020 | −36.2% | +18.3% |
| 2019 | +7.2% | +31.2% |
| 2018 | −15.1% | −4.6% |
| 2017 | −3.8% | +21.7% |
| 2016 | +19.9% | +12.0% |

## Risk and diversification

How XOM has fallen, how it held up in crashes beside the S&P 500 and its popular alternatives, and what moves independently of it.

### What were XOM's worst declines?

A drawdown is the decline from a peak to the lowest point before a new high.

- Not every decline was the market's doing: XOM fell 62.4% from June 2014 to March 2020, while the S&P 500 rose 27.6%.
- In three of XOM's four worst declines, the S&P 500 held up better over the same dates.
- The longest climb back to a previous high took 22 months, after XOM fell 62.4% from June 2014 to March 2020.

| Decline | Peak | Low | Back at the high | SPY over the same dates | Market event |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| −62.4% | June 23, 2014 | March 23, 2020 | January 25, 2022 | +27.6% | 2015 China and oil sell-off |
| −37.3% | May 20, 2008 | July 2, 2010 | January 19, 2012 | −24.2% | 2008 financial crisis |
| −33.6% | November 24, 2000 | July 22, 2002 | April 15, 2004 | −37.7% | dot-com bust |
| −33.0% | August 11, 1987 | October 19, 1987 | July 19, 1989 | — |  |
| −20.5% | June 8, 2022 | July 14, 2022 | October 19, 2022 | −7.7% | 2022 bear market |

### How did XOM do in stock market crashes?

This section measures how far XOM, the S&P 500 and each alternative fell from peak to trough during every major market crash since 2000.

- None of its popular alternatives fell less than XOM in most of the crashes they both traded through.
- XOM fell further than the S&P 500 in five of the ten crashes it has traded through. The clearest case was the Covid crash, when XOM fell 47.9% and the S&P 500 fell 33.7%.

| Crash | Dates | XOM fall | SPY fall |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Dot-com bust | March 10, 2000 to October 9, 2002 | −33.6% | −47.5% |
| Global financial crisis | October 9, 2007 to March 9, 2009 | −33.7% | −55.2% |
| Flash crash | May 6, 2010 to May 7, 2010 | −0.3% | −1.5% |
| Euro debt crisis | July 22, 2011 to October 3, 2011 | −19.6% | −17.9% |
| China devaluation & oil rout | August 10, 2015 to February 11, 2016 | −15.0% | −12.8% |
| Volmageddon | February 2, 2018 to February 9, 2018 | −10.0% | −6.5% |
| Q4 2018 selloff | September 21, 2018 to December 24, 2018 | −23.6% | −19.3% |
| COVID crash | February 19, 2020 to March 23, 2020 | −47.9% | −33.7% |
| 2022 bear market | January 4, 2022 to October 12, 2022 | −20.5% | −24.5% |
| SVB / regional bank stress | March 8, 2023 to March 13, 2023 | −3.1% | −3.4% |

### How closely does XOM move with the S&P 500?

Upside capture measures how much of the S&P 500's gains an investment kept in the months the market rose, and downside capture how much of its losses it took in the months the market fell.

- Nine of the 16 popular alternatives had a higher capture ratio (upside capture divided by downside capture) than XOM's 0.94, led by PBR, EQNR and MPC.
- EQNR took just 52% of the S&P 500's losses, against 83% for XOM, while still keeping 79% of its gains.
- Over the past 10 years, XOM captured 78% of the S&P 500's gains in rising months and 83% of its losses in falling months, with a beta of 0.76. Its share of the market's losses was slightly larger than its share of the gains.

Measured over the past 10 years of monthly returns against SPY.

| Investment | Upside capture | Downside capture | Beta |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| XOM: Exxonmobil Holdings Corporation (this page) | 78.0% | 83.0% | 0.76 |
| [MPC](https://easycompare.io/research/mpc): Marathon Petroleum Corporation | 138% | 95.0% | 1.29 |
| [PBR](https://easycompare.io/research/pbr): Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. - Petrobras | 104% | 63.0% | 0.99 |
| [SU](https://easycompare.io/research/su): Suncor Energy Inc. | 90.0% | 90.0% | 0.96 |
| EC: Ecopetrol S.A. | 127% | 139% | 1.13 |
| [E](https://easycompare.io/research/e): Eni S.p.A. | 79.0% | 69.0% | 0.70 |
| YPF: YPF Sociedad Anónima | 144% | 206% | 1.58 |
| [WMB](https://easycompare.io/research/wmb): The Williams Companies, Inc. | 85.0% | 78.0% | 1.02 |
| [COP](https://easycompare.io/research/cop): ConocoPhillips | 94.0% | 92.0% | 0.91 |
| [EQNR](https://easycompare.io/research/eqnr): Equinor ASA | 79.0% | 52.0% | 0.62 |
| [SHEL](https://easycompare.io/research/shel): Shell plc | 60.0% | 43.0% | 0.45 |
| [CVX](https://easycompare.io/research/cvx): Chevron Corporation | 86.0% | 94.0% | 0.89 |
| [TTE](https://easycompare.io/research/tte): TotalEnergies SE | 69.0% | 57.0% | 0.51 |
| [CVE](https://easycompare.io/research/cve): Cenovus Energy Inc. | 124% | 173% | 1.69 |
| [EOG](https://easycompare.io/research/eog): EOG Resources, Inc. | 92.0% | 135% | 1.17 |
| [BP](https://easycompare.io/research/bp): BP p.l.c. | 58.0% | 62.0% | 0.51 |
| [SLB](https://easycompare.io/research/slb): Slb N.V. | 104% | 212% | 1.54 |

### What diversifies XOM?

Correlation measures how closely two investments move together, on a scale from 1 (in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to -1 (in opposite directions).

- Moving a fifth of the money in XOM into SMH would have cut the portfolio's volatility by 20% over the past 5 years and raised its annual return (+26.9% for XOM alone, +31.1% for the mix).
- Among large ETFs, DXJ, SMH and DBEF have moved largely independently of XOM over the past 5 years, with correlations of 0.24 or lower, and each still earned a positive 5-year return.
- FIX made money in seven of the ten calendar years in which XOM lost money.

| Investment | Correlation with XOM | 5Y return | Volatility | Sharpe | Rose in XOM's 10 down years |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| DXJ: WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund | 0.20 | +225% | 19.1% | 1.34 | 6 of 10 |
| [SMH](https://easycompare.io/research/smh): VanEck Semiconductor ETF | -0.15 | +323% | 36.9% | 0.97 | 5 of 10 |
| DBEF: Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF | 0.24 | +85.0% | 13.8% | 0.96 | 5 of 10 |
| [GLD](https://easycompare.io/research/gld): SPDR Gold Shares | 0.06 | +126% | 18.9% | 0.96 | 5 of 10 |
| SPMO: Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 0.00 | +136% | 20.8% | 0.93 | 3 of 10 |
| DFIV: Dimensional - International Value ETF | 0.47 | +99.4% | 16.4% | 0.93 | 1 of 10 |
| [VTV](https://easycompare.io/research/vtv): Vanguard Morningstar Value ETF | 0.42 | +76.6% | 13.7% | 0.90 | 5 of 10 |
| VLUE: iShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF | 0.22 | +109% | 18.4% | 0.90 | 3 of 10 |

## Common questions

### What was XOM's worst drawdown?

XOM's deepest decline since it began trading in 1986 was 62.4%, from June 2014 to March 2020. It took 22 months from the low to climb back to its old high.

### What were XOM's best and worst years?

Over 29 full calendar years, XOM's best year was 2022, when it returned 87.4%. Its worst was 2020, with a return of -36.2%.

### Is there a better investment than XOM?

Among XOM's popular alternatives, MPC, YPF and PBR were ahead of XOM in most short and long periods, though with much bigger swings (33.4%, 54.1% and 37.5% volatility against 26.5%). Looking beyond its popular alternatives, PBR-A (integrated oil & gas) and VLO (oil & gas) were ahead of XOM in most short and long periods, though with much bigger swings (37.5% and 36.9% volatility against 26.5%).

### Is XOM more volatile than the S&P 500?

Yes. XOM's volatility over the past 5 years was 26.5%, 1.5 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, XOM's return lands within 26.5% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump.

### What is XOM's Sharpe ratio?

XOM's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 1.04, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so XOM earned more for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings.

### How correlated is XOM with the S&P 500?

Over the past 5 years, XOM's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.13 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They are only loosely linked, which makes it a real diversifier next to an index fund. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against XOM instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a XOM holding.

### What are the best alternatives to XOM?

Of the 16 popular alternatives we compared, four outperformed XOM in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes, with dividends reinvested: MPC, PBR and SU.

### Did XOM outperform the S&P 500?

XOM finished ahead of the S&P 500 (SPY) in 12 of 29 full calendar years. In 2025, it returned +16.0%, against +17.7% for the index.

### How did XOM do in stock market crashes?

XOM fell less than the S&P 500 (SPY) in four of the ten major crashes it has traded through, and further in five. The clearest case was the Covid crash, when XOM fell 47.9% and the S&P 500 fell 33.7%.

### What diversifies XOM?

These had a low correlation with XOM over the past 5 years and still earned a positive 5-year return: among large ETFs, DXJ (correlation 0.20), SMH (correlation -0.15) and DBEF (correlation 0.24); among large stocks, CAH (correlation 0.13), CLS (correlation -0.04) and FIX (correlation 0.07). A correlation near zero means the two have moved largely independently.

## More research

- [Marathon Petroleum (MPC) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/mpc)
- [Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. - Petrobras (PBR) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/pbr)
- [Suncor Energy (SU) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/su)
- [Eni S.p.A. (E) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/e)
- [Williams Companies (WMB) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/wmb)
- [ConocoPhillips (COP) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/cop)
- [Equinor ASA (EQNR) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/eqnr)
- [Shell (SHEL) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/shel)
- [Chevron (CVX) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/cvx)
- [TotalEnergies (TTE) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/tte)
- [Cenovus Energy (CVE) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/cve)
- [EOG Resources (EOG) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/eog)

## Explore further

- Full page with charts: https://easycompare.io/research/xom
- All research pages: https://easycompare.io/llms.txt
- Compare the entire market against XOM live: https://betterthanspy.com/?b=XOM&utm_source=easycompare&utm_medium=research