# How Waste Management (WM) compares with the whole market and its popular alternatives

> Source: EasyCompare research, https://easycompare.io/research/wm
> Data as of October 20, 2026. Total returns include reinvested dividends. Past performance does not predict future results; nothing here is investment advice.

Built by QuantCommons' quantitative engine, this page is about relative opportunity, not data on WM alone. It places WM (Waste Management, Inc.) against 11 popular alternatives, its neighboring categories and the entire market of over 10,000 U.S.-listed stocks and ETFs, and surfaces what has done better on consistent outperformance, return for the risk taken, behavior in real market crashes and diversification. The result is a clearer view of where WM stands in the market, and of the alternatives worth a closer look.

Period covered: WM's full trading record, from June 1988 through September 2026. All returns include reinvested dividends. Data as of October 20, 2026.

## Key findings

- **Right now:** Its environmental services peers split over the past 3 months: RSG (Republic Services) rose 6.0%, while PESI (Perma-Fix Environmental Services) fell 24.8%. Over the past 3 months, WM fell 2.6% while the S&P 500 rose 3.9%.
- **Stock or market?:** WM fell 2.6% over the past 3 months, 3.5 points ahead of the industrials sector ETF XLI (State Street Industrial Select Sector SPDR ETF), which fell 6.1%. The S&P 500 rose 3.9%. WM rose 11.9% last month as the S&P 500 fell 0.6% and the Nasdaq 100 fell 3.2%.
- **Past 1 to 3 years:** WM has trailed the market, rising 9.4% over the past year against 15.8% for the S&P 500 and 17.9% for the Nasdaq 100. The same gap shows up over 3 years (54.9% against 89.3%). That said, WM lagged its environmental services peers in 2023, then moved up the pack in 2025.
- **Long term:** WM turned $10,000 into $44,400 over the past decade, against $42,100 in the S&P 500. On the flip side, over 5 years WM trailed the index: 56.2% against 81.7%.
- **In a crash:** Across seven sell-offs, WM has typically lost about 76% as much as the S&P 500. In the 2022 bear market, WM held up better than WCN (Waste Connections), CLH and GFL; only RSG (Republic Services) fell less.
- **Diversification:** WM moves far less with the S&P 500 than it used to, with a correlation of 0.35 over the past 5 years against 0.72 in the 5 years before. Against the S&P 500, WM has a correlation of 0.35 over 5 years, less closely than 60% of stocks worth at least $300 million. Next to an index fund it is some diversification, but not a hedge.
- **Better options**
  - **Nearby categories and themes:** WAB (Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies, industrial machinery) and EMR (Emerson Electric, industrial machinery) were ahead of WM in most short and long periods, though with much bigger swings (26.2% and 27.7% volatility against 19.2%).
  - **Whole market:** 198 of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than WM with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them VTI (Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF), VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) and BRK-B (Berkshire Hathaway).

## How much would $10,000 in WM have grown?

This chart tracks a hypothetical $10,000 investment in WM over the past 29 years, with dividends reinvested, alongside the same amount in the S&P 500, investments that ended ahead of WM over the same span and WM's popular alternatives, among those that traded for the entire period.

- $10,000 invested in WM at the end of September 1997 would have grown to $93,069 by September 2026, less than the $132,907 it would have become in SPY, an S&P 500 fund.
- Five of the seven other investments on the chart ended ahead of WM, and CLH finished highest, at $3,202,231.

## WM at a glance

This section summarizes the key facts about the stock, its returns over periods from one to ten years and the risk it has carried, with dividends reinvested throughout.

- WM's deepest decline since it began trading in 1988 was 77.8%, from May 1999 to March 2000. It took about 13 years from the low to climb back to its old high.
- Over 29 full calendar years, WM's best was 2000, when it returned 61.5%, and its worst was 1999, when it lost 63.1%. It lost money in five of those years.
- WM is 4.8% below its all-time high.

- Type: Stock, Industrials (Waste Management)
- Trading since: June 3, 1988
- Market value: $93B
- Volatility (5 years): 19.2%; Sharpe ratio: 0.56
- Worst decline ever: −77.8%, from May 4, 1999 to March 28, 2000; back at its high by August 8, 2013

| Period | WM total return |
| --- | --- |
| 1 month | +11.9% |
| 3 months | −2.6% |
| 6 months | +4.3% |
| year to date | +7.5% |
| 1 year | +9.4% |
| 3 years | +54.9% |
| 5 years | +56.2% |
| 10 years | +344% |

## WM against the whole market

Where WM ranks among every stock and fund, and what across the market has done better.

### How does WM rank among all stocks?

This section ranks WM on return, volatility, risk-adjusted return and worst decline against every stock worth at least $300 million with enough history.

- WM's worst decline of the past 10 years ranks in the top 1% of the 2,187 stocks worth at least $300 million, where the top fell the least.

| Measure | WM | Rank |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1-year return | +9.4% | 1,606 of 3,287 (top 49%) |
| 3-year return | +54.9% | 1,469 of 3,017 (top 49%) |
| 5-year return | +56.2% | 1,035 of 2,893 (top 36%) |
| 10-year return | +344% | 495 of 2,202 (top 23%) |
| Volatility, 5 years | 19.2% | 73 of 2,893 (top 3%) |
| Sharpe ratio, 5 years | 0.56 | 764 of 2,893 (top 27%) |
| Worst decline, past 10 years | −30.1% | 19 of 2,187 (top 1%) |

### What has beaten WM on both return and risk?

Each dot is an investment, placed by how much it earned a year over the past 5 years (higher is better) and how much its price swung, its volatility (further left is calmer).

- Five stocks and 193 ETFs worth at least $500 million sit in the green region: each earned more than WM over the past 5 years with smaller price swings. That is 5% of the 3,633 screened.
- Among those with at least half WM's swings, LVHI has the best return for its risk: 17.0% a year at 11.1% volatility, 42% less than WM's 19.2%, and a Sharpe ratio (return above cash per unit of volatility) of 1.48 against 0.56 for WM.

### Is there a better investment than WM?

The table below lists investments that beat WM over the past 5 years on at least one of these measures: a higher annual return with lower volatility, a higher annual return at similar volatility, a similar return with lower volatility, a higher Sharpe ratio with a smaller worst decline, a higher total return in most periods from 3 months to 10 years, or smaller losses in recent market crashes.

- Among WM's popular alternatives, RSG earned more than WM over the past 5 years with similar volatility: 13.9% a year at 18.5% volatility, against 9.3% a year at 19.2%.
- Looking beyond its popular alternatives, WAB (industrial machinery) and EMR (industrial machinery) were ahead of WM in most short and long periods, though with much bigger swings (26.2% and 27.7% volatility against 19.2%).
- Across the whole market, 198 of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than WM with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them VTI, VOO and BRK-B.

The 15 strongest of 198 investments that beat WM over the past 5 years, out of 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million.

| Investment | Group | Annual return (5 years) | Volatility | Sharpe | Worst decline (10 years) | 10Y return | Correlation with WM | Better on |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| WM: Waste Management, Inc. (this page) |  | +9.3% | 19.2% | 0.56 | −30.1% | +344% |  |  |
| [DFAC](https://easycompare.io/research/dfac): Dimensional - US Core Equity 2 ETF | US Total Market | +11.4% | 17.0% | 0.72 | −23.1% | — | 0.37 | Higher return, lower volatility; Higher Sharpe, smaller worst decline; Higher return in most periods |
| FJAN: FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - January | Multi-Asset | +11.1% | 10.5% | 1.05 | −13.6% | — | 0.23 | Higher return, lower volatility; Higher Sharpe, smaller worst decline; Higher return in most periods |
| AVLV: Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF | US Large-Cap Value | +14.0% | 16.9% | 0.86 | −19.5% | — | 0.40 | Higher return, lower volatility; Higher Sharpe, smaller worst decline; Higher return in most periods |
| JAVA: JPMorgan Active Value ETF | US Large-Cap Value | +11.5% | 14.5% | 0.82 | −16.5% | — |  | Higher return, lower volatility; Higher Sharpe, smaller worst decline; Higher return in most periods |
| TSPA: T. Rowe Price U.S. Equity Research ETF | Broad Market | +13.1% | 17.1% | 0.81 | −24.7% | — | 0.35 | Higher return, lower volatility; Higher Sharpe, smaller worst decline; Higher return in most periods |
| QDPL: Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF | Dividend & Income | +11.8% | 15.0% | 0.82 | −22.6% | — | 0.33 | Higher return, lower volatility; Higher Sharpe, smaller worst decline; Higher return in most periods |
| [BRK-B](https://easycompare.io/research/brk-b): Berkshire Hathaway Inc. | Insurance | +13.4% | 17.1% | 0.82 | −29.6% | +274% | 0.46 | Higher return, lower volatility; Higher return in most periods |
| INFL: Horizon Kinetics Inflation Beneficiaries ETF | Broad Market | +11.8% | 17.8% | 0.72 | −21.3% | — | 0.44 | Higher return, lower volatility; Higher Sharpe, smaller worst decline; Higher return in most periods |
| FTQI: First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF | Dividend & Income | +11.5% | 14.8% | 0.82 | −19.4% | +121% | 0.22 | Higher return, lower volatility; Higher Sharpe, smaller worst decline; Higher return in most periods |
| [JNJ](https://easycompare.io/research/jnj): Johnson & Johnson | Pharmaceuticals | +12.7% | 17.9% | 0.76 | −27.4% | +196% | 0.37 | Higher return, lower volatility; Higher return in most periods |
| SIXA: ETC 6 Meridian Mega Cap Equity ETF | Broad Market | +12.8% | 12.7% | 1.01 | −18.4% | — | 0.47 | Higher return, lower volatility; Higher Sharpe, smaller worst decline; Higher return in most periods |
| LVHI: Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | International Equity | +17.0% | 11.1% | 1.48 | −32.4% | +194% | 0.39 | Higher return, lower volatility; Higher return in most periods |
| [KO](https://easycompare.io/research/ko): The Coca-Cola Company | Food & Beverages | +14.7% | 16.8% | 0.91 | −37.0% | +204% | 0.37 | Higher return, lower volatility; Higher return in most periods |
| [VIG](https://easycompare.io/research/vig): Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF | US Dividend Equity | +10.4% | 14.1% | 0.78 | −31.7% | +258% | 0.48 | Higher return, lower volatility; Higher return in most periods |
| [DYNF](https://easycompare.io/research/dynf): iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF | US Multifactor Equity | +14.7% | 17.5% | 0.87 | −34.7% | — | 0.35 | Higher return, lower volatility; Higher return in most periods |

## WM against its popular alternatives

The investments people most often weigh against WM, compared period by period and year by year.

### How do WM's risk and return compare with its alternatives?

This map plots each investment's annual return over the past 5 years against its volatility, the size of its typical price swings.

- Only RSG was both more rewarding and calmer than WM over the past 5 years, earning a higher annual return with lower volatility.
- Eight of the 11 popular alternatives earned less than WM over the past 5 years while swinging more, the weaker corner of the map.
- Over the past 5 years, WM returned 9.3% a year, less than the S&P 500's 12.7%, with higher volatility (19.2% against 17.1%).

### Has WM consistently beaten its popular alternatives?

This section compares WM with the investments people most often weigh against it, checking each one over eight periods from one month to ten years.

- Two of the 11 popular alternatives, CLH and RSG, outperformed WM in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes.

| Investment | 1Y return | 3Y return | 5Y return | 10Y return | Periods ahead of WM | Verdict | Sharpe |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| WM: Waste Management, Inc. (this page) | +9.4% | +54.9% | +56.2% | +344% |  |  | 0.56 |
| CLH: Clean Harbors, Inc. | +30.0% | +102% | +183% | +588% | 3/5 short-term, 3/3 long-term | consistent | 0.88 |
| [RSG](https://easycompare.io/research/rsg): Republic Services, Inc. | +7.1% | +66.1% | +91.5% | +446% | 3/5 short-term, 3/3 long-term | consistent | 0.80 |
| CWST: Casella Waste Systems, Inc. | +8.3% | +22.6% | +14.7% | +740% | 2/5 short-term, 1/3 long-term |  | 0.24 |
| TTEK: Tetra Tech, Inc. | +5.6% | +13.7% | +11.6% | +388% | 2/5 short-term, 1/3 long-term |  | 0.23 |
| PESI: Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc. | −8.4% | +36.0% | +75.9% | +156% | 0/5 short-term, 1/3 long-term |  | 0.49 |
| DAR: Darling Ingredients Inc. | +86.2% | +42.0% | −23.4% | +342% | 2/5 short-term, 0/3 long-term |  | 0.07 |
| [WCN](https://easycompare.io/research/wcn): Waste Connections, Inc. | −1.8% | +27.0% | +34.2% | +270% | 2/5 short-term, 0/3 long-term |  | 0.40 |
| CLW: Clearwater Paper Corporation | −3.5% | −47.8% | −54.5% | −70.7% | 2/5 short-term, 0/3 long-term |  | -0.10 |
| GFL: GFL Environmental Inc. | −2.2% | +48.6% | +11.1% | — | 2/5 short-term, 0/3 long-term |  | 0.22 |
| AWK: American Water Works Company, Inc. | −4.1% | +26.2% | −13.1% | +131% | 1/5 short-term, 0/3 long-term |  | -0.01 |
| XYL: Xylem Inc. | −27.4% | +18.7% | −11.7% | +143% | 0/5 short-term, 0/3 long-term |  | 0.04 |

### How did WM do year by year?

This table shows each investment's total return in every full calendar year since 1997, along with where WM ranked among its popular alternatives each year.

- WM finished ahead of the S&P 500 in 13 of its 29 full calendar years, and behind it in each of the last three.
- Among its popular alternatives, WCN came out ahead of WM most often, in 15 of the 24 years both traded.
- Ranked against its popular alternatives each year, WM finished in the top quarter in four of 29 years and in the bottom quarter in two. In 2025, it ranked 3 of 12.

| Year | WM | SPY |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2025 | +10.5% | +17.7% |
| 2024 | +14.3% | +24.9% |
| 2023 | +16.2% | +26.2% |
| 2022 | −4.5% | −18.2% |
| 2021 | +43.8% | +28.7% |
| 2020 | +5.5% | +18.3% |
| 2019 | +30.4% | +31.2% |
| 2018 | +5.3% | −4.6% |
| 2017 | +24.5% | +21.7% |
| 2016 | +36.4% | +12.0% |

## Risk and diversification

How WM has fallen, how it held up in crashes beside the S&P 500 and its popular alternatives, and what moves independently of it.

### What were WM's worst declines?

A drawdown is the decline from a peak to the lowest point before a new high.

- Not every decline was the market's doing: WM fell 77.8% from May 1999 to March 2000, while the S&P 500 rose 14.2%.
- The slowest recovery came after WM fell 77.8% from May 1999 to March 2000; it did not regain that peak until August 2013, 13 years later.

| Decline | Peak | Low | Back at the high | SPY over the same dates | Market event |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| −77.8% | May 4, 1999 | March 28, 2000 | August 8, 2013 | +14.2% | dot-com bust |
| −73.1% | June 3, 1988 | January 31, 1990 | July 13, 1990 | — |  |
| −45.8% | January 2, 1992 | November 22, 1993 | July 27, 1995 | — |  |
| −33.1% | July 16, 1998 | October 8, 1998 | May 3, 1999 | −18.1% |  |
| −31.2% | July 27, 1990 | August 24, 1990 | February 4, 1991 | — |  |

### How did WM do in stock market crashes?

This section measures how far WM, the S&P 500 and each alternative fell from peak to trough during every major market crash since 2000.

- WM fell less than the S&P 500 in eight of the ten crashes it has traded through. The clearest case was the dot-com bust, when WM fell 32.9% and the S&P 500 fell 47.5%.
- None of its popular alternatives fell less than WM in most of the crashes they both traded through.

| Crash | Dates | WM fall | SPY fall |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Dot-com bust | March 10, 2000 to October 9, 2002 | −32.9% | −47.5% |
| Global financial crisis | October 9, 2007 to March 9, 2009 | −41.5% | −55.2% |
| Flash crash | May 6, 2010 to May 7, 2010 | −0.7% | −1.5% |
| Euro debt crisis | July 22, 2011 to October 3, 2011 | −21.7% | −17.9% |
| China devaluation & oil rout | August 10, 2015 to February 11, 2016 | −6.7% | −12.8% |
| Volmageddon | February 2, 2018 to February 9, 2018 | −8.6% | −6.5% |
| Q4 2018 selloff | September 21, 2018 to December 24, 2018 | −10.7% | −19.3% |
| COVID crash | February 19, 2020 to March 23, 2020 | −29.5% | −33.7% |
| 2022 bear market | January 4, 2022 to October 12, 2022 | −16.8% | −24.5% |
| SVB / regional bank stress | March 8, 2023 to March 13, 2023 | −0.9% | −3.4% |

### How closely does WM move with the S&P 500?

Upside capture measures how much of the S&P 500's gains an investment kept in the months the market rose, and downside capture how much of its losses it took in the months the market fell.

- Over the past 10 years, WM captured 68% of the S&P 500's gains in rising months and 44% of its losses in falling months, with a beta of 0.62. That is a defensive profile: it gave up some of the market's upside in exchange for smaller losses.
- Only RSG and CWST had a higher capture ratio (upside capture divided by downside capture) than WM's 1.54, out of ten popular alternatives with the same record.
- RSG took just 34% of the S&P 500's losses, against 44% for WM, while still keeping 71% of its gains.

Measured over the past 10 years of monthly returns against SPY.

| Investment | Upside capture | Downside capture | Beta |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| WM: Waste Management, Inc. (this page) | 68.0% | 44.0% | 0.62 |
| CLH: Clean Harbors, Inc. | 126% | 118% | 1.27 |
| [RSG](https://easycompare.io/research/rsg): Republic Services, Inc. | 71.0% | 34.0% | 0.55 |
| CWST: Casella Waste Systems, Inc. | 106% | 68.0% | 0.85 |
| TTEK: Tetra Tech, Inc. | 94.0% | 76.0% | 0.88 |
| PESI: Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc. | 82.0% | 85.0% | 0.83 |
| DAR: Darling Ingredients Inc. | 118% | 127% | 1.05 |
| [WCN](https://easycompare.io/research/wcn): Waste Connections, Inc. | 65.0% | 47.0% | 0.60 |
| CLW: Clearwater Paper Corporation | 9.0% | 101% | 0.78 |
| AWK: American Water Works Company, Inc. | 48.0% | 45.0% | 0.44 |
| XYL: Xylem Inc. | 90.0% | 123% | 1.03 |

### What diversifies WM?

Correlation measures how closely two investments move together, on a scale from 1 (in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to -1 (in opposite directions).

- Moving a fifth of the money in WM into LVHI would have cut the portfolio's volatility by 16% over the past 5 years and raised its annual return (+8.1% for WM alone, +10.1% for the mix).
- Among large ETFs, LVHI, DXJ and HDV have moved largely independently of WM over the past 5 years, with correlations of 0.42 or lower, and each still earned a positive 5-year return.
- MCK made money in three of the five calendar years in which WM lost money.

| Investment | Correlation with WM | 5Y return | Volatility | Sharpe | Rose in WM's 5 down years |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| LVHI: Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 0.39 | +119% | 11.1% | 1.48 | 1 of 5 |
| DXJ: WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund | 0.26 | +225% | 19.1% | 1.34 | 1 of 5 |
| HDV: iShares Core High Dividend ETF | 0.42 | +83.3% | 13.0% | 1.00 | 1 of 5 |
| MLPX: Global X - MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF | 0.44 | +135% | 19.7% | 0.97 | 1 of 5 |
| [SMH](https://easycompare.io/research/smh): VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.12 | +323% | 36.9% | 0.97 | 2 of 5 |
| DBEF: Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF | 0.42 | +85.0% | 13.8% | 0.96 | 0 of 5 |
| [GLD](https://easycompare.io/research/gld): SPDR Gold Shares | 0.19 | +126% | 18.9% | 0.96 | 2 of 5 |
| SPMO: Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 0.29 | +136% | 20.8% | 0.93 | 0 of 5 |

## Common questions

### What was WM's worst drawdown?

WM's deepest decline since it began trading in 1988 was 77.8%, from May 1999 to March 2000. It took about 13 years from the low to climb back to its old high.

### What were WM's best and worst years?

Over 29 full calendar years, WM's best year was 2000, when it returned 61.5%. Its worst was 1999, with a return of -63.1%.

### Is there a better investment than WM?

Among WM's popular alternatives, RSG earned more than WM over the past 5 years with similar volatility: 13.9% a year at 18.5% volatility, against 9.3% a year at 19.2%. Looking beyond its popular alternatives, WAB (industrial machinery) and EMR (industrial machinery) were ahead of WM in most short and long periods, though with much bigger swings (26.2% and 27.7% volatility against 19.2%).

### Is WM more volatile than the S&P 500?

Yes. WM's volatility over the past 5 years was 19.2%, 1.1 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, WM's return lands within 19.2% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump.

### What is WM's Sharpe ratio?

WM's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.56, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so WM earned less for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings.

### How correlated is WM with the S&P 500?

Over the past 5 years, WM's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.35 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They are only loosely linked, which makes it a real diversifier next to an index fund. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against WM instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a WM holding.

### What are the best alternatives to WM?

Of the 11 popular alternatives we compared, two outperformed WM in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes, with dividends reinvested: CLH and RSG.

### Did WM outperform the S&P 500?

WM finished ahead of the S&P 500 (SPY) in 13 of 29 full calendar years. In 2025, it returned +10.5%, against +17.7% for the index.

### How did WM do in stock market crashes?

WM fell less than the S&P 500 (SPY) in eight of the ten major crashes it has traded through, and further in two. The clearest case was the dot-com bust, when WM fell 32.9% and the S&P 500 fell 47.5%.

### What diversifies WM?

These had a low correlation with WM over the past 5 years and still earned a positive 5-year return: among large ETFs, LVHI (correlation 0.39), DXJ (correlation 0.26) and HDV (correlation 0.42); among large stocks, CAH (correlation 0.34), CLS (correlation -0.03) and FIX (correlation 0.30). A correlation near zero means the two have moved largely independently.

## More research

- [Republic Services (RSG) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/rsg)
- [Waste Connections (WCN) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/wcn)
- [Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/schd)
- [NVIDIA (NVDA) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/nvda)
- [Apple (AAPL) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/aapl)
- [Alphabet (GOOG) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/goog)
- [Microsoft (MSFT) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/msft)
- [Amazon.com (AMZN) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/amzn)
- [Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/vti)
- [Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing (TSM) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/tsm)
- [Space Exploration Technologies (SPCX) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/spcx)
- [Meta Platforms (META) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/meta)

## Explore further

- Full page with charts: https://easycompare.io/research/wm
- All research pages: https://easycompare.io/llms.txt
- Compare the entire market against WM live: https://betterthanspy.com/?b=WM&utm_source=easycompare&utm_medium=research