# How Trane Technologies (TT) compares with the whole market and its popular alternatives

> Source: EasyCompare research, https://easycompare.io/research/tt
> Data as of October 20, 2026. Total returns include reinvested dividends. Past performance does not predict future results; nothing here is investment advice.

Built by QuantCommons' quantitative engine, this page is about relative opportunity, not data on TT alone. It places TT (Trane Technologies plc) against 17 popular alternatives, its neighboring categories and the entire market of over 10,000 U.S.-listed stocks and ETFs, and surfaces what has done better on consistent outperformance, return for the risk taken, behavior in real market crashes and diversification. The result is a clearer view of where TT stands in the market, and of the alternatives worth a closer look.

Period covered: TT's full trading record, from October 1986 through September 2026. All returns include reinvested dividends. Data as of October 20, 2026.

## Key findings

- **Right now:** TT has gone against the market, falling 2.9% over the past 6 months while the S&P 500 rose 9.1%. Its building product peers split over the past 6 months: WCC (WESCO International) rose 6.1%, while VRT (Vertiv) fell 35.2%.
- **Stock or market?:** TT fell 1.2% over the past 3 months, 4.9 points ahead of the building products ETF XLI (State Street Industrial Select Sector SPDR ETF), which fell 6.1%. The S&P 500 rose 3.9%. Its building product peers did not move as one over the past 3 months: WCC (WESCO International) rose 7.2%, while VRT (Vertiv) fell 30.2%.
- **Past 1 to 3 years:** Over the past year, TT rose 11.3% against 15.8% for the S&P 500 and 17.9% for the Nasdaq 100.
- **Long term:** TT turned $10,000 into $106,000 over the past decade, against $42,100 in the S&P 500. TT's 10-year return of 955% puts it ahead of 95% of the stocks worth at least $300 million with that much history. The S&P 500 returned 321%.
- **In a crash:** Across seven sell-offs, TT has typically fallen 1.4 times as far as the S&P 500. In the 2022 bear market, TT fell 37.5%, against 24.5% for the S&P 500. That was more than FIX (Comfort Systems USA, 23.9%) but less than JCI (Johnson Controls International, 41.6%).
- **Diversification:** Against the S&P 500, TT has a correlation of 0.65 over 5 years, more closely than 95% of stocks worth at least $300 million. Next to an index fund it is more of the same, not a cushion.
- **Better options**
  - **Popular alternatives:** NVT (nVent Electric) was ahead of TT in most short and long periods, though with much bigger swings (38.0% volatility against 27.7%).
  - **Nearby categories and themes:** WAB (Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies, industrial machinery) earned more than TT with less volatility over the past 5 years: 25.6% a year at 26.2% volatility, against 22.7% a year at 27.7%.
  - **Whole market:** Few investments have done better on both counts: only 15 of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than TT with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them ABBV (AbbVie), HSBC and WELL (Welltower).

## How much would $10,000 in TT have grown?

This chart tracks a hypothetical $10,000 investment in TT over the past 29 years, with dividends reinvested, alongside the same amount in the S&P 500, investments that ended ahead of TT over the same span and TT's popular alternatives, among those that traded for the entire period.

- $10,000 invested in TT at the end of September 1997 would have grown to $405,736 by September 2026, more than the $132,907 it would have become in SPY, an S&P 500 fund.
- Five of the eight other investments on the chart ended ahead of TT, and AAON finished highest, at $1,960,947.

## TT at a glance

This section summarizes the key facts about the stock, its returns over periods from one to ten years and the risk it has carried, with dividends reinvested throughout.

- TT's deepest decline since it began trading in 1986 was 78.1%, from July 2007 to March 2009. It took about four years from the low to climb back to its old high.
- Over 29 full calendar years, TT's best was 2009, when it returned 110%, and its worst was 2008, when it lost 62.0%. It lost money in six of those years.
- TT is 8.1% below its all-time high.

- Type: Stock, Industrials (Industrial - Machinery)
- Trading since: October 17, 1986
- Market value: $102B
- Volatility (5 years): 27.7%; Sharpe ratio: 0.88
- Worst decline ever: −78.1%, from July 18, 2007 to March 6, 2009; back at its high by February 1, 2013

| Period | TT total return |
| --- | --- |
| 1 month | +6.5% |
| 3 months | −1.2% |
| 6 months | −2.9% |
| year to date | +16.8% |
| 1 year | +11.3% |
| 3 years | +154% |
| 5 years | +178% |
| 10 years | +955% |

## TT against the whole market

Where TT ranks among every stock and fund, and what across the market has done better.

### How does TT rank among all stocks?

This section ranks TT on return, volatility, risk-adjusted return and worst decline against every stock worth at least $300 million with enough history.

- TT's 10-year return ranks in the top 5% of the 2,202 stocks worth at least $300 million with 10 years of history.

| Measure | TT | Rank |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1-year return | +11.3% | 1,533 of 3,287 (top 47%) |
| 3-year return | +154% | 578 of 3,017 (top 20%) |
| 5-year return | +178% | 371 of 2,893 (top 13%) |
| 10-year return | +955% | 117 of 2,202 (top 6%) |
| Volatility, 5 years | 27.7% | 526 of 2,893 (top 19%) |
| Sharpe ratio, 5 years | 0.88 | 190 of 2,893 (top 7%) |
| Worst decline, past 10 years | −40.5% | 163 of 2,187 (top 8%) |

### What has beaten TT on both return and risk?

Each dot is an investment, placed by how much it earned a year over the past 5 years (higher is better) and how much its price swung, its volatility (further left is calmer).

- 13 stocks and two ETFs worth at least $500 million sit in the green region: each earned more than TT over the past 5 years with smaller price swings. That is fewer than 1% of the 3,633 screened. Few investments beat it on both counts.
- Among those with at least half TT's swings, CAH has the best return for its risk: 42.1% a year at 24.7% volatility, 11% less than TT's 27.7%, and a Sharpe ratio (return above cash per unit of volatility) of 1.55 against 0.88 for TT.
- None of TT's popular alternatives made it, but WAB (industrial machinery) did: 25.6% a year at 26.2% volatility, 5% less than TT's 27.7%.

### Is there a better investment than TT?

The table below lists investments that beat TT over the past 5 years on at least one of these measures: a higher annual return with lower volatility, a higher annual return at similar volatility, a similar return with lower volatility, a higher Sharpe ratio with a smaller worst decline, a higher total return in most periods from 3 months to 10 years, or smaller losses in recent market crashes.

- Among TT's popular alternatives, NVT was ahead of TT in most short and long periods, though with much bigger swings (38.0% volatility against 27.7%).
- Looking beyond its popular alternatives, WAB (industrial machinery) earned more than TT with less volatility over the past 5 years: 25.6% a year at 26.2% volatility, against 22.7% a year at 27.7%.
- Few investments have done better on both counts: only 15 of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than TT with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them ABBV, HSBC and WELL.

The 15 strongest of 15 investments that beat TT over the past 5 years, out of 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million.

| Investment | Group | Annual return (5 years) | Volatility | Sharpe | Worst decline (10 years) | 10Y return | Correlation with TT | Better on |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| TT: Trane Technologies plc (this page) |  | +22.7% | 27.7% | 0.88 | −40.5% | +955% |  |  |
| [CAH](https://easycompare.io/research/cah): Cardinal Health, Inc. | Health Care Distribution | +42.1% | 24.7% | 1.55 | −46.1% | +349% | 0.40 | Higher return, lower volatility; Higher return in most periods |
| [HSBC](https://easycompare.io/research/hsbc): HSBC Holdings plc | Banks | +33.1% | 25.9% | 1.24 | −62.3% | +319% | 0.18 | Higher return, lower volatility; Higher return in most periods |
| [WELL](https://easycompare.io/research/well): Welltower Inc. | Healthcare REITs | +26.0% | 23.8% | 1.09 | −63.3% | +379% | 0.43 | Higher return, lower volatility; Higher return in most periods |
| [COR](https://easycompare.io/research/cor): Cencora, Inc. | Health Care Distribution | +24.2% | 22.8% | 1.07 | −32.4% | +406% | 0.36 | Higher return, lower volatility; Higher Sharpe, smaller worst decline |
| [WAB](https://easycompare.io/research/wab): Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation | Industrial Machinery | +25.6% | 26.2% | 1.00 | −64.1% | +264% | 0.65 | Higher return, lower volatility; Higher return in most periods |
| DTM: DT Midstream, Inc. | Oil & Gas Midstream | +24.5% | 25.2% | 1.00 | −23.6% | — | 0.46 | Higher return, lower volatility; Higher Sharpe, smaller worst decline |
| BLX: Bladex, Inc. | Banks - Regional | +31.4% | 25.9% | 1.19 | −68.5% | +290% | 0.39 | Higher return, lower volatility; Higher return in most periods |
| EPU: iShares MSCI Peru and Global Exposure ETF | International | +29.5% | 24.9% | 1.17 | −51.0% | +275% | 0.26 | Higher return, lower volatility; Higher return in most periods |
| [ABBV](https://easycompare.io/research/abbv): AbbVie Inc. | Pharmaceuticals | +26.1% | 23.4% | 1.11 | −45.1% | +603% | 0.03 | Higher return, lower volatility |
| DXJ: WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund | International Equity | +26.6% | 19.1% | 1.34 | −39.1% | +428% | 0.39 | Higher return, lower volatility |
| [MCK](https://easycompare.io/research/mck): McKesson Corporation | Health Care Distribution | +38.7% | 25.0% | 1.44 | −38.1% | +586% | 0.20 | Higher return, lower volatility |
| [WMB](https://easycompare.io/research/wmb): The Williams Companies, Inc. | Oil & Gas Midstream | +24.6% | 24.0% | 1.04 | −68.1% | +288% | 0.33 | Higher return, lower volatility |
| [GWW](https://easycompare.io/research/gww): W.W. Grainger, Inc. | Industrial Distribution | +26.3% | 24.9% | 1.07 | −41.6% | +654% | 0.61 | Higher return, lower volatility |
| PAA: Plains All American Pipeline, L.P. | Oil & Gas Midstream | +27.0% | 25.6% | 1.06 | −87.9% | +64.0% | 0.16 | Higher return, lower volatility |
| PAGP: Plains GP Holdings LP | Oil & Gas Midstream | +26.8% | 26.1% | 1.05 | −88.0% | +56.3% | 0.15 | Higher return, lower volatility |

## TT against its popular alternatives

The investments people most often weigh against TT, compared period by period and year by year.

### How do TT's risk and return compare with its alternatives?

This map plots each investment's annual return over the past 5 years against its volatility, the size of its typical price swings.

- None of the 17 popular alternatives earned more than TT over the past 5 years with smaller price swings, so every higher return on the map came with a bumpier ride.
- 11 of the 17 popular alternatives earned less than TT over the past 5 years while swinging more, the weaker corner of the map.
- Over the past 5 years, TT returned 22.7% a year, more than the S&P 500's 12.7%, with higher volatility (27.7% against 17.1%).

### Has TT consistently beaten its popular alternatives?

This section compares TT with the investments people most often weigh against it, checking each one over eight periods from one month to ten years.

- Only one of the 17 popular alternatives, NVT, outperformed TT in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes.
- EME outperformed TT over all three long-term periods but in none of the five short-term ones, so TT has had the better of it lately.

| Investment | 1Y return | 3Y return | 5Y return | 10Y return | Periods ahead of TT | Verdict | Sharpe |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| TT: Trane Technologies plc (this page) | +11.3% | +154% | +178% | +955% |  |  | 0.88 |
| NVT: nVent Electric plc | +40.0% | +203% | +356% | — | 3/5 short-term, 2/3 long-term | consistent | 0.99 |
| [FIX](https://easycompare.io/research/fix): Comfort Systems USA, Inc. | +67.3% | +819% | +1,636% | +5,305% | 2/5 short-term, 3/3 long-term |  | 1.46 |
| EME: EMCOR Group, Inc. | +0.5% | +267% | +499% | +1,202% | 0/5 short-term, 3/3 long-term |  | 1.20 |
| MOD: Modine Manufacturing Company | −7.0% | +260% | +1,127% | +1,187% | 0/5 short-term, 3/3 long-term |  | 1.13 |
| [VRT](https://easycompare.io/research/vrt): Vertiv Holdings Co | +16.0% | +456% | +772% | — | 1/5 short-term, 2/3 long-term |  | 1.01 |
| WCC: WESCO International, Inc. | +57.1% | +179% | +176% | +505% | 4/5 short-term, 1/3 long-term |  | 0.68 |
| [JCI](https://easycompare.io/research/jci): Johnson Controls International plc | +35.4% | +220% | +123% | +426% | 4/5 short-term, 1/3 long-term |  | 0.70 |
| [EMR](https://easycompare.io/research/emr): Emerson Electric Co. | +25.0% | +84.9% | +82.1% | +309% | 4/5 short-term, 0/3 long-term |  | 0.57 |
| [ETN](https://easycompare.io/research/etn): Eaton Corporation plc | +2.3% | +104% | +153% | +657% | 1/5 short-term, 0/3 long-term |  | 0.74 |
| SPXC: SPX Technologies, Inc. | −11.2% | +108% | +168% | +728% | 0/5 short-term, 0/3 long-term |  | 0.72 |
| HUBB: Hubbell Incorporated | +7.7% | +70.6% | +159% | +442% | 0/5 short-term, 0/3 long-term |  | 0.79 |
| BLDR: Builders FirstSource, Inc. | −56.0% | −50.7% | −7.5% | +417% | 0/5 short-term, 0/3 long-term |  | 0.20 |
| AAON: AAON, Inc. | −26.5% | +40.8% | +61.2% | +308% | 0/5 short-term, 0/3 long-term |  | 0.44 |
| WSO: Watsco, Inc. | −17.4% | −5.5% | +20.6% | +196% | 0/5 short-term, 0/3 long-term |  | 0.28 |
| LII: Lennox International Inc. | −31.2% | +7.5% | +24.2% | +175% | 0/5 short-term, 0/3 long-term |  | 0.30 |
| [HON](https://easycompare.io/research/hon): Honeywell International Inc. | +6.8% | +27.0% | +7.5% | +160% | 0/5 short-term, 0/3 long-term |  | 0.18 |
| [CARR](https://easycompare.io/research/carr): Carrier Global Corporation | −1.1% | +21.2% | +11.6% | — | 0/5 short-term, 0/3 long-term |  | 0.23 |

### How did TT do year by year?

This table shows each investment's total return in every full calendar year since 1997, along with where TT ranked among its popular alternatives each year.

- Ranked against its popular alternatives each year, TT finished in the top quarter in seven of 29 years and in the bottom quarter in four. In 2025, it ranked 11 of 18.
- TT finished ahead of the S&P 500 in 17 of its 29 full calendar years.
- Among its popular alternatives, AAON came out ahead of TT most often, in 17 of the 29 years both traded.

| Year | TT | SPY |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2025 | +6.4% | +17.7% |
| 2024 | +53.0% | +24.9% |
| 2023 | +47.4% | +26.2% |
| 2022 | −15.3% | −18.2% |
| 2021 | +41.0% | +28.7% |
| 2020 | +43.4% | +18.3% |
| 2019 | +48.3% | +31.2% |
| 2018 | +4.4% | −4.6% |
| 2017 | +21.3% | +21.7% |
| 2016 | +38.5% | +12.0% |

## Risk and diversification

How TT has fallen, how it held up in crashes beside the S&P 500 and its popular alternatives, and what moves independently of it.

### What were TT's worst declines?

A drawdown is the decline from a peak to the lowest point before a new high.

- In all three of TT's worst declines, the S&P 500 held up better over the same dates.
- Not every decline was the market's doing: TT fell 56.6% from May 1999 to October 2000, while the S&P 500 rose 2.0%.
- The slowest recovery came after TT fell 78.1% from July 2007 to March 2009; it did not regain that peak until February 2013, four years later.

| Decline | Peak | Low | Back at the high | SPY over the same dates | Market event |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| −78.1% | July 18, 2007 | March 6, 2009 | February 1, 2013 | −53.8% | 2008 financial crisis |
| −56.6% | May 4, 1999 | October 18, 2000 | December 26, 2003 | +2.0% | dot-com bust |
| −51.0% | May 23, 1990 | October 30, 1990 | January 16, 1992 | — |  |
| −47.6% | October 2, 1987 | October 26, 1987 | June 7, 1989 | — |  |
| −40.5% | August 3, 2021 | June 17, 2022 | August 2, 2023 | −15.9% | 2022 bear market |

### How did TT do in stock market crashes?

This section measures how far TT, the S&P 500 and each alternative fell from peak to trough during every major market crash since 2000.

- TT fell further than the S&P 500 in seven of the ten crashes it has traded through. The clearest case was the 2008 financial crisis, when TT fell 77.5% and the S&P 500 fell 55.2%.
- Among its popular alternatives, EMR held up best, falling less than TT in seven of the ten crashes they both traded through.

| Crash | Dates | TT fall | SPY fall |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Dot-com bust | March 10, 2000 to October 9, 2002 | −44.7% | −47.5% |
| Global financial crisis | October 9, 2007 to March 9, 2009 | −77.5% | −55.2% |
| Flash crash | May 6, 2010 to May 7, 2010 | −2.6% | −1.5% |
| Euro debt crisis | July 22, 2011 to October 3, 2011 | −34.2% | −17.9% |
| China devaluation & oil rout | August 10, 2015 to February 11, 2016 | −20.6% | −12.8% |
| Volmageddon | February 2, 2018 to February 9, 2018 | −8.0% | −6.5% |
| Q4 2018 selloff | September 21, 2018 to December 24, 2018 | −17.9% | −19.3% |
| COVID crash | February 19, 2020 to March 23, 2020 | −39.2% | −33.7% |
| 2022 bear market | January 4, 2022 to October 12, 2022 | −37.5% | −24.5% |
| SVB / regional bank stress | March 8, 2023 to March 13, 2023 | −3.3% | −3.4% |

### How closely does TT move with the S&P 500?

Upside capture measures how much of the S&P 500's gains an investment kept in the months the market rose, and downside capture how much of its losses it took in the months the market fell.

- Over the past 10 years, TT captured 115% of the S&P 500's gains in rising months and 69% of its losses in falling months, with a beta of 1.10. Its share of the market's gains was larger than its share of the losses.
- Only FIX and EME had a higher capture ratio (upside capture divided by downside capture) than TT's 1.66, out of 14 popular alternatives with the same record.

Measured over the past 10 years of monthly returns against SPY.

| Investment | Upside capture | Downside capture | Beta |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| TT: Trane Technologies plc (this page) | 115% | 69.0% | 1.10 |
| [FIX](https://easycompare.io/research/fix): Comfort Systems USA, Inc. | 180% | 71.0% | 1.38 |
| EME: EMCOR Group, Inc. | 128% | 75.0% | 1.16 |
| MOD: Modine Manufacturing Company | 189% | 180% | 2.20 |
| WCC: WESCO International, Inc. | 165% | 194% | 1.96 |
| [JCI](https://easycompare.io/research/jci): Johnson Controls International plc | 102% | 90.0% | 1.17 |
| [EMR](https://easycompare.io/research/emr): Emerson Electric Co. | 124% | 153% | 1.39 |
| [ETN](https://easycompare.io/research/etn): Eaton Corporation plc | 114% | 80.0% | 1.16 |
| SPXC: SPX Technologies, Inc. | 141% | 130% | 1.33 |
| HUBB: Hubbell Incorporated | 108% | 101% | 1.03 |
| BLDR: Builders FirstSource, Inc. | 163% | 203% | 1.90 |
| AAON: AAON, Inc. | 90.0% | 74.0% | 0.99 |
| WSO: Watsco, Inc. | 74.0% | 74.0% | 0.93 |
| LII: Lennox International Inc. | 81.0% | 96.0% | 1.02 |
| [HON](https://easycompare.io/research/hon): Honeywell International Inc. | 90.0% | 118% | 1.00 |

### What diversifies TT?

Correlation measures how closely two investments move together, on a scale from 1 (in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to -1 (in opposite directions).

- Moving a fifth of the money in TT into GLD would have cut the portfolio's volatility by 19% over the past 5 years while keeping its annual return (+22.8% for TT alone, +22.8% for the mix).
- Among large ETFs, LVHI, DXJ and EMLP have moved largely independently of TT over the past 5 years, with correlations of 0.49 or lower, and each still earned a positive 5-year return.
- XLE made money in four of the six calendar years in which TT lost money.

| Investment | Correlation with TT | 5Y return | Volatility | Sharpe | Rose in TT's 6 down years |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| LVHI: Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 0.41 | +119% | 11.1% | 1.48 | 1 of 6 |
| DXJ: WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund | 0.39 | +225% | 19.1% | 1.34 | 2 of 6 |
| EMLP: First Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund | 0.49 | +101% | 14.5% | 1.04 | 1 of 6 |
| EWP: iShares MSCI Spain ETF | 0.42 | +140% | 20.3% | 0.97 | 1 of 6 |
| [GLD](https://easycompare.io/research/gld): SPDR Gold Shares | 0.04 | +126% | 18.9% | 0.96 | 3 of 6 |
| [XLE](https://easycompare.io/research/xle): State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | 0.09 | +177% | 25.5% | 0.93 | 4 of 6 |
| EWT: iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF | 0.48 | +153% | 24.2% | 0.89 | 1 of 6 |
| AMLP: Alerian MLP ETF | 0.26 | +111% | 18.9% | 0.89 | 2 of 6 |

## Common questions

### What was TT's worst drawdown?

TT's deepest decline since it began trading in 1986 was 78.1%, from July 2007 to March 2009. It took about four years from the low to climb back to its old high.

### What were TT's best and worst years?

Over 29 full calendar years, TT's best year was 2009, when it returned 110%. Its worst was 2008, with a return of -62.0%.

### Is there a better investment than TT?

Among TT's popular alternatives, NVT was ahead of TT in most short and long periods, though with much bigger swings (38.0% volatility against 27.7%). Looking beyond its popular alternatives, WAB (industrial machinery) earned more than TT with less volatility over the past 5 years: 25.6% a year at 26.2% volatility, against 22.7% a year at 27.7%.

### Is TT more volatile than the S&P 500?

Yes. TT's volatility over the past 5 years was 27.7%, 1.6 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, TT's return lands within 27.7% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump.

### What is TT's Sharpe ratio?

TT's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.88, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so TT earned more for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings.

### How correlated is TT with the S&P 500?

Over the past 5 years, TT's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.65 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They often move together: some diversification next to an index fund, but not a cushion. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against TT instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a TT holding.

### What are the best alternatives to TT?

Of the 17 popular alternatives we compared, one outperformed TT in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes, with dividends reinvested: NVT.

### Did TT outperform the S&P 500?

TT finished ahead of the S&P 500 (SPY) in 17 of 29 full calendar years. In 2025, it returned +6.4%, against +17.7% for the index.

### How did TT do in stock market crashes?

TT fell less than the S&P 500 (SPY) in two of the ten major crashes it has traded through, and further in seven. The clearest case was the 2008 financial crisis, when TT fell 77.5% and the S&P 500 fell 55.2%.

### What diversifies TT?

These had a low correlation with TT over the past 5 years and still earned a positive 5-year return: among large ETFs, LVHI (correlation 0.41), DXJ (correlation 0.39) and EMLP (correlation 0.49); among large stocks, CAH (correlation 0.40), CLS (correlation 0.37) and MCK (correlation 0.20). A correlation near zero means the two have moved largely independently.

## More research

- [Comfort Systems USA (FIX) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/fix)
- [Vertiv (VRT) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/vrt)
- [Johnson Controls International (JCI) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/jci)
- [Emerson Electric (EMR) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/emr)
- [Eaton (ETN) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/etn)
- [Honeywell International (HON) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/hon)
- [Carrier Global (CARR) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/carr)
- [Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/schd)
- [NVIDIA (NVDA) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/nvda)
- [Apple (AAPL) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/aapl)
- [Alphabet (GOOG) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/goog)
- [Microsoft (MSFT) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/msft)

## Explore further

- Full page with charts: https://easycompare.io/research/tt
- All research pages: https://easycompare.io/llms.txt
- Compare the entire market against TT live: https://betterthanspy.com/?b=TT&utm_source=easycompare&utm_medium=research