# How Travelers Companies (TRV) compares with the whole market and its popular alternatives

> Source: EasyCompare research, https://easycompare.io/research/trv
> Data as of October 20, 2026. Total returns include reinvested dividends. Past performance does not predict future results; nothing here is investment advice.

Built by QuantCommons' quantitative engine, this page is about relative opportunity, not data on TRV alone. It places TRV (The Travelers Companies, Inc.) against 20+ popular alternatives, its neighboring categories and the entire market of over 10,000 U.S.-listed stocks and ETFs, and surfaces what has done better on consistent outperformance, return for the risk taken, behavior in real market crashes and diversification. The result is a clearer view of where TRV stands in the market, and of the alternatives worth a closer look.

Period covered: TRV's full trading record, from October 1986 through September 2026. All returns include reinvested dividends. Data as of October 20, 2026.

## Key findings

- **Right now:** Over the past 6 months, TRV rose 32.6% against 9.1% for the S&P 500 and 11.2% for the Nasdaq 100. Its property & casualty insurance peers were far apart over the past 6 months, from SAFT (Safety Insurance Group, up 39.8%) to PGR (Progressive, up 9.0%).
- **Stock or market?:** TRV held up far better than its industry: it rose 7.8% over the past 3 months while the property & casualty insurance ETF KIE (State Street SPDR S&P Insurance ETF) fell 1.2%. The S&P 500 rose 3.9%. Its property & casualty insurance peers did not move as one over the past 3 months: SAFT (Safety Insurance Group) rose 42.3%, while ALL (Allstate) fell 1.1%.
- **Past 1 to 3 years:** TRV has run far ahead of the market, rising 51.5% over the past year against 15.8% for the S&P 500 and 17.9% for the Nasdaq 100. The same gap shows up over 3 years (158% against 89.3%). TRV lagged its property & casualty insurance peers in 2023, then moved up the pack in 2025.
- **Long term:** TRV turned $10,000 into $44,700 over the past decade, against $42,100 in the S&P 500. TRV's 10-year return of 347% puts it ahead of 78% of the stocks worth at least $300 million with that much history. The S&P 500 returned 321%.
- **In a crash:** TRV fell less than the S&P 500 in three of the last four sell-offs, including the 2022 bear market (18.9% against 24.5%). In the 2022 bear market, TRV fell 18.9%, against 24.5% for the S&P 500. That was more than PGR (Progressive, 10.5%) but less than ALL (Allstate, 20.3%).
- **Diversification:** TRV is some diversification, but not a hedge: a correlation of 0.32 with the S&P 500 over 5 years and 0.33 with the total US market, less closely than 66% of stocks worth at least $300 million. Over 10 years TRV kept more of the market's gains than of its losses: 70% of the S&P 500's gains in rising months and 48% of its losses in falling ones, with a beta of 0.59.
- **Better options:** Few investments have done better on both counts: only two of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than TRV with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them MPLX and DXJ (WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund).

## How much would $10,000 in TRV have grown?

This chart tracks a hypothetical $10,000 investment in TRV over the past 29 years, with dividends reinvested, alongside the same amount in the S&P 500, investments that ended ahead of TRV over the same span and TRV's popular alternatives, among those that traded for the entire period.

- $10,000 invested in TRV at the end of September 1997 would have grown to $178,972 by September 2026, more than the $132,907 it would have become in SPY, an S&P 500 fund.
- Five of the eight other investments on the chart ended ahead of TRV, and AJG finished highest, at $566,042.

## TRV at a glance

This section summarizes the key facts about the stock, its returns over periods from one to ten years and the risk it has carried, with dividends reinvested throughout.

- TRV's deepest decline since it began trading in 1986 was 55.1%, from December 2000 to July 2002. It took about four years from the low to climb back to its old high.
- TRV is trading within 1% of its all-time high.
- Over 29 full calendar years, TRV's best was 2000, when it returned 65.7%, and its worst was 2002, when it lost 20.1%. It lost money in seven of those years.

- Type: Stock, Financials (Insurance - Property & Casualty)
- Trading since: October 17, 1986
- Market value: $83B
- Volatility (5 years): 22.3%; Sharpe ratio: 1.02
- Worst decline ever: −55.1%, from December 8, 2000 to July 25, 2002; back at its high by October 4, 2006

| Period | TRV total return |
| --- | --- |
| 1 month | +6.6% |
| 3 months | +7.8% |
| 6 months | +32.6% |
| year to date | +40.3% |
| 1 year | +51.5% |
| 3 years | +158% |
| 5 years | +174% |
| 10 years | +347% |

## TRV against the whole market

Where TRV ranks among every stock and fund, and what across the market has done better.

### How does TRV rank among all stocks?

This section ranks TRV on return, volatility, risk-adjusted return and worst decline against every stock worth at least $300 million with enough history.

- On return for the risk taken (the Sharpe ratio), TRV ranks in the top 3% of the 2,893 stocks worth at least $300 million.

| Measure | TRV | Rank |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1-year return | +51.5% | 537 of 3,287 (top 17%) |
| 3-year return | +158% | 558 of 3,017 (top 19%) |
| 5-year return | +174% | 379 of 2,893 (top 14%) |
| 10-year return | +347% | 485 of 2,202 (top 23%) |
| Volatility, 5 years | 22.3% | 162 of 2,893 (top 6%) |
| Sharpe ratio, 5 years | 1.02 | 90 of 2,893 (top 4%) |
| Worst decline, past 10 years | −46.3% | 330 of 2,187 (top 16%) |

### What has beaten TRV on both return and risk?

Each dot is an investment, placed by how much it earned a year over the past 5 years (higher is better) and how much its price swung, its volatility (further left is calmer).

- One stock and one ETF worth at least $500 million sit in the green region: each earned more than TRV over the past 5 years with smaller price swings. That is fewer than 1% of the 3,633 screened. Few investments beat it on both counts.
- Among those with at least half TRV's swings, DXJ has the best return for its risk: 26.6% a year at 19.1% volatility, 15% less than TRV's 22.3%, and a Sharpe ratio (return above cash per unit of volatility) of 1.34 against 1.02 for TRV.

### Is there a better investment than TRV?

The table below lists investments that beat TRV over the past 5 years on at least one of these measures: a higher annual return with lower volatility, a higher annual return at similar volatility, a similar return with lower volatility, a higher Sharpe ratio with a smaller worst decline, a higher total return in most periods from 3 months to 10 years, or smaller losses in recent market crashes.

- Few investments have done better on both counts: only two of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than TRV with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them MPLX and DXJ.

The 2 strongest of 2 investments that beat TRV over the past 5 years, out of 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million.

| Investment | Group | Annual return (5 years) | Volatility | Sharpe | Worst decline (10 years) | 10Y return | Correlation with TRV | Better on |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| TRV: The Travelers Companies, Inc. (this page) |  | +22.4% | 22.3% | 1.02 | −46.3% | +347% |  |  |
| DXJ: WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund | International Equity | +26.6% | 19.1% | 1.34 | −39.1% | +428% | 0.25 | Higher return, lower volatility; Higher Sharpe, smaller worst decline |
| [MPLX](https://easycompare.io/research/mplx): MPLX Lp | Oil & Gas Midstream | +23.5% | 18.8% | 1.22 | −75.2% | +350% | 0.50 | Higher return, lower volatility |

## TRV against its popular alternatives

The investments people most often weigh against TRV, compared period by period and year by year.

### How do TRV's risk and return compare with its alternatives?

This map plots each investment's annual return over the past 5 years against its volatility, the size of its typical price swings.

- None of the 23 popular alternatives earned more than TRV over the past 5 years with smaller price swings, so every higher return on the map came with a bumpier ride.
- 18 of the 23 popular alternatives earned less than TRV over the past 5 years while swinging more, the weaker corner of the map.
- Over the past 5 years, TRV returned 22.4% a year, more than the S&P 500's 12.7%, with higher volatility (22.3% against 17.1%).

### Has TRV consistently beaten its popular alternatives?

This section compares TRV with the investments people most often weigh against it, checking each one over eight periods from one month to ten years.

- None of the 24 popular alternatives outperformed TRV in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes. The closest was HCI.

| Investment | 1Y return | 3Y return | 5Y return | 10Y return | Periods ahead of TRV | Verdict | Sharpe |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| TRV: The Travelers Companies, Inc. (this page) | +51.5% | +158% | +174% | +347% |  |  | 1.02 |
| HCI: HCI Group, Inc. | +5.3% | +267% | +73.5% | +829% | 2/5 short-term, 2/3 long-term |  | 0.47 |
| [AJG](https://easycompare.io/research/ajg): Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. | −6.1% | +17.3% | +68.0% | +516% | 1/5 short-term, 1/3 long-term |  | 0.55 |
| [PGR](https://easycompare.io/research/pgr): The Progressive Corporation | +7.7% | +56.8% | +162% | +816% | 0/5 short-term, 1/3 long-term |  | 0.89 |
| WRB: W. R. Berkley Corporation | +2.3% | +87.3% | +138% | +443% | 0/5 short-term, 1/3 long-term |  | 0.87 |
| MCY: Mercury General Corporation | +33.9% | +268% | +119% | +198% | 0/5 short-term, 1/3 long-term |  | 0.63 |
| SAFT: Safety Insurance Group, Inc. | +56.4% | +63.8% | +65.8% | +138% | 4/5 short-term, 0/3 long-term |  | 0.49 |
| THG: The Hanover Insurance Group, Inc. | +37.7% | +115% | +95.9% | +291% | 1/5 short-term, 0/3 long-term |  | 0.70 |
| [MET](https://easycompare.io/research/met): MetLife, Inc. | +32.2% | +84.0% | +76.5% | +240% | 1/5 short-term, 0/3 long-term |  | 0.58 |
| KMPR: Kemper Corporation | −37.4% | −24.1% | −48.0% | −3.1% | 1/5 short-term, 0/3 long-term |  | -0.16 |
| SKWD: Skyward Specialty Insurance Group, Inc. | +32.8% | +122% | — | — | 1/5 short-term, 0/3 long-term |  | — |
| [ALL](https://easycompare.io/research/all): The Allstate Corporation | +31.5% | +116% | +119% | +356% | 0/5 short-term, 0/3 long-term |  | 0.73 |
| ORI: Old Republic International Corporation | +3.6% | +81.5% | +119% | +349% | 0/5 short-term, 0/3 long-term |  | 0.82 |
| AFG: American Financial Group, Inc. | +20.4% | +66.9% | +59.7% | +321% | 0/5 short-term, 0/3 long-term |  | 0.53 |
| ACGL: Arch Capital Group Ltd. | +16.5% | +28.7% | +150% | +309% | 0/5 short-term, 0/3 long-term |  | 0.87 |
| HIG: The Hartford Insurance Group, Inc. | +12.1% | +105% | +106% | +294% | 0/5 short-term, 0/3 long-term |  | 0.77 |
| [CB](https://easycompare.io/research/cb): Chubb Limited | +35.0% | +78.9% | +107% | +248% | 0/5 short-term, 0/3 long-term |  | 0.82 |
| RLI: RLI Corp. | +14.2% | +8.4% | +47.7% | +206% | 0/5 short-term, 0/3 long-term |  | 0.45 |
| CINF: Cincinnati Financial Corporation | +13.6% | +87.6% | +62.7% | +203% | 0/5 short-term, 0/3 long-term |  | 0.51 |
| [AON](https://easycompare.io/research/aon): Aon plc | −13.0% | −3.1% | −1.6% | +195% | 0/5 short-term, 0/3 long-term |  | 0.11 |
| CNA: CNA Financial Corporation | +15.2% | +56.4% | +55.2% | +183% | 0/5 short-term, 0/3 long-term |  | 0.52 |
| L: Loews Corporation | +12.5% | +78.4% | +94.9% | +180% | 0/5 short-term, 0/3 long-term |  | 0.80 |
| SIGI: Selective Insurance Group, Inc. | +9.1% | −9.1% | +24.1% | +160% | 0/5 short-term, 0/3 long-term |  | 0.30 |
| EG: Everest Group, Ltd. | +14.8% | +6.0% | +57.0% | +155% | 0/5 short-term, 0/3 long-term |  | 0.48 |
| AXS: AXIS Capital Holdings Limited | +11.1% | +90.4% | +116% | +137% | 0/5 short-term, 0/3 long-term |  | 0.74 |

### How did TRV do year by year?

This table shows each investment's total return in every full calendar year since 1997, along with where TRV ranked among its popular alternatives each year.

- TRV finished ahead of the S&P 500 in 13 of its 29 full calendar years, and ahead of it in each of the last two.
- Among its popular alternatives, PGR came out ahead of TRV most often, in 19 of the 29 years both traded.
- Ranked against its popular alternatives each year, TRV finished in the top quarter in five of 29 years and in the bottom quarter in five. In 2025, it ranked 8 of 25.

| Year | TRV | SPY |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2025 | +22.4% | +17.7% |
| 2024 | +28.8% | +24.9% |
| 2023 | +3.9% | +26.2% |
| 2022 | +22.4% | −18.2% |
| 2021 | +14.0% | +28.7% |
| 2020 | +5.3% | +18.3% |
| 2019 | +17.0% | +31.2% |
| 2018 | −9.7% | −4.6% |
| 2017 | +13.4% | +21.7% |
| 2016 | +11.0% | +12.0% |

## Risk and diversification

How TRV has fallen, how it held up in crashes beside the S&P 500 and its popular alternatives, and what moves independently of it.

### What were TRV's worst declines?

A drawdown is the decline from a peak to the lowest point before a new high.

- In all four of TRV's worst declines, the S&P 500 held up better over the same dates.
- Not every decline was the market's doing: TRV fell 51.0% from March 1998 to March 2000, while the S&P 500 rose 28.3%.
- The slowest recovery came after TRV fell 55.1% from December 2000 to July 2002; it did not regain that peak until October 2006, four years later.

| Decline | Peak | Low | Back at the high | SPY over the same dates | Market event |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| −55.1% | December 8, 2000 | July 25, 2002 | October 4, 2006 | −35.9% | dot-com bust |
| −51.0% | March 19, 1998 | March 8, 2000 | July 27, 2000 | +28.3% |  |
| −46.3% | July 15, 2019 | March 18, 2020 | February 23, 2021 | −19.4% | Covid crash |
| −44.3% | May 11, 2007 | October 10, 2008 | November 9, 2009 | −39.6% | 2008 financial crisis |
| −31.1% | October 15, 1987 | April 21, 1988 | June 30, 1989 | — |  |

### How did TRV do in stock market crashes?

This section measures how far TRV, the S&P 500 and each alternative fell from peak to trough during every major market crash since 2000.

- Among its popular alternatives, RLI held up best, falling less than TRV in seven of the ten crashes they both traded through.
- TRV fell less than the S&P 500 in five of the ten crashes it has traded through. The clearest case was the 2008 financial crisis, when TRV fell 43.7% and the S&P 500 fell 55.2%.

| Crash | Dates | TRV fall | SPY fall |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Dot-com bust | March 10, 2000 to October 9, 2002 | −55.1% | −47.5% |
| Global financial crisis | October 9, 2007 to March 9, 2009 | −43.7% | −55.2% |
| Flash crash | May 6, 2010 to May 7, 2010 | −1.1% | −1.5% |
| Euro debt crisis | July 22, 2011 to October 3, 2011 | −18.1% | −17.9% |
| China devaluation & oil rout | August 10, 2015 to February 11, 2016 | −11.4% | −12.8% |
| Volmageddon | February 2, 2018 to February 9, 2018 | −8.8% | −6.5% |
| Q4 2018 selloff | September 21, 2018 to December 24, 2018 | −15.7% | −19.3% |
| COVID crash | February 19, 2020 to March 23, 2020 | −39.2% | −33.7% |
| 2022 bear market | January 4, 2022 to October 12, 2022 | −18.9% | −24.5% |
| SVB / regional bank stress | March 8, 2023 to March 13, 2023 | −2.6% | −3.4% |

### How closely does TRV move with the S&P 500?

Upside capture measures how much of the S&P 500's gains an investment kept in the months the market rose, and downside capture how much of its losses it took in the months the market fell.

- Over the past 10 years, TRV captured 70% of the S&P 500's gains in rising months and 48% of its losses in falling months, with a beta of 0.59. That is a defensive profile: it gave up some of the market's upside in exchange for smaller losses.
- PGR took just -5% of the S&P 500's losses, against 48% for TRV, while still keeping 72% of its gains.
- Four of the 22 popular alternatives had a higher capture ratio (upside capture divided by downside capture) than TRV's 1.48, led by WRB, AJG and THG.

Measured over the past 10 years of monthly returns against SPY.

| Investment | Upside capture | Downside capture | Beta |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| TRV: The Travelers Companies, Inc. (this page) | 70.0% | 48.0% | 0.59 |
| HCI: HCI Group, Inc. | 110% | 80.0% | 0.90 |
| [AJG](https://easycompare.io/research/ajg): Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. | 80.0% | 46.0% | 0.61 |
| [PGR](https://easycompare.io/research/pgr): The Progressive Corporation | 72.0% | −5.0% | 0.36 |
| WRB: W. R. Berkley Corporation | 68.0% | 26.0% | 0.55 |
| MCY: Mercury General Corporation | 63.0% | 59.0% | 0.65 |
| SAFT: Safety Insurance Group, Inc. | 50.0% | 41.0% | 0.23 |
| THG: The Hanover Insurance Group, Inc. | 64.0% | 37.0% | 0.60 |
| [MET](https://easycompare.io/research/met): MetLife, Inc. | 91.0% | 97.0% | 1.03 |
| KMPR: Kemper Corporation | 80.0% | 171% | 0.93 |
| [ALL](https://easycompare.io/research/all): The Allstate Corporation | 68.0% | 41.0% | 0.49 |
| ORI: Old Republic International Corporation | 82.0% | 61.0% | 0.70 |
| AFG: American Financial Group, Inc. | 84.0% | 75.0% | 0.78 |
| ACGL: Arch Capital Group Ltd. | 74.0% | 57.0% | 0.57 |
| HIG: The Hartford Insurance Group, Inc. | 83.0% | 77.0% | 0.78 |
| [CB](https://easycompare.io/research/cb): Chubb Limited | 63.0% | 48.0% | 0.54 |
| RLI: RLI Corp. | 57.0% | 54.0% | 0.39 |
| CINF: Cincinnati Financial Corporation | 66.0% | 63.0% | 0.60 |
| [AON](https://easycompare.io/research/aon): Aon plc | 79.0% | 89.0% | 0.78 |
| CNA: CNA Financial Corporation | 57.0% | 45.0% | 0.54 |
| L: Loews Corporation | 66.0% | 64.0% | 0.71 |
| SIGI: Selective Insurance Group, Inc. | 56.0% | 51.0% | 0.56 |
| EG: Everest Group, Ltd. | 46.0% | 32.0% | 0.46 |
| AXS: AXIS Capital Holdings Limited | 55.0% | 53.0% | 0.67 |

### What diversifies TRV?

Correlation measures how closely two investments move together, on a scale from 1 (in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to -1 (in opposite directions).

- Moving a fifth of the money in TRV into GLD would have cut the portfolio's volatility by 17% over the past 5 years and raised its annual return (+20.9% for TRV alone, +21.0% for the mix).
- Among large ETFs, DXJ, SMH and DBEF have moved largely independently of TRV over the past 5 years, with correlations of 0.42 or lower, and each still earned a positive 5-year return.
- Among large stocks, CAH, CLS and FIX have moved largely independently of TRV over the past 5 years, with correlations of 0.42 or lower, and each still earned a positive 5-year return.

| Investment | Correlation with TRV | 5Y return | Volatility | Sharpe | Rose in TRV's 7 down years |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| DXJ: WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund | 0.25 | +225% | 19.1% | 1.34 | 0 of 7 |
| [SMH](https://easycompare.io/research/smh): VanEck Semiconductor ETF | -0.05 | +323% | 36.9% | 0.97 | 0 of 7 |
| DBEF: Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF | 0.42 | +85.0% | 13.8% | 0.96 | 0 of 7 |
| [GLD](https://easycompare.io/research/gld): SPDR Gold Shares | 0.06 | +126% | 18.9% | 0.96 | 1 of 7 |
| SPMO: Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 0.31 | +136% | 20.8% | 0.93 | 0 of 7 |
| [XLE](https://easycompare.io/research/xle): State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | 0.48 | +177% | 25.5% | 0.93 | 2 of 7 |
| MLPA: Global X - MLP ETF | 0.49 | +103% | 17.2% | 0.91 | 0 of 7 |
| VLUE: iShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF | 0.36 | +109% | 18.4% | 0.90 | 0 of 7 |

## Common questions

### What was TRV's worst drawdown?

TRV's deepest decline since it began trading in 1986 was 55.1%, from December 2000 to July 2002. It took about four years from the low to climb back to its old high.

### What were TRV's best and worst years?

Over 29 full calendar years, TRV's best year was 2000, when it returned 65.7%. Its worst was 2002, with a return of -20.1%.

### Is there a better investment than TRV?

Few investments have done better on both counts: only two of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than TRV with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them MPLX and DXJ.

### Is TRV more volatile than the S&P 500?

Yes. TRV's volatility over the past 5 years was 22.3%, 1.3 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, TRV's return lands within 22.3% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump.

### What is TRV's Sharpe ratio?

TRV's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 1.02, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so TRV earned more for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings.

### How correlated is TRV with the S&P 500?

Over the past 5 years, TRV's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.32 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They are only loosely linked, which makes it a real diversifier next to an index fund. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against TRV instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a TRV holding.

### What are the best alternatives to TRV?

None of the 24 popular alternatives we compared outperformed TRV in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes, which says more about TRV's strength than about its alternatives.

### Did TRV outperform the S&P 500?

TRV finished ahead of the S&P 500 (SPY) in 13 of 29 full calendar years. In 2025, it returned +22.4%, against +17.7% for the index.

### How did TRV do in stock market crashes?

TRV fell less than the S&P 500 (SPY) in five of the ten major crashes it has traded through, and further in three. The clearest case was the 2008 financial crisis, when TRV fell 43.7% and the S&P 500 fell 55.2%.

### What diversifies TRV?

These had a low correlation with TRV over the past 5 years and still earned a positive 5-year return: among large ETFs, DXJ (correlation 0.25), SMH (correlation -0.05) and DBEF (correlation 0.42); among large stocks, CAH (correlation 0.42), CLS (correlation 0.09) and FIX (correlation 0.21). A correlation near zero means the two have moved largely independently.

## More research

- [Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. (AJG) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/ajg)
- [Progressive (PGR) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/pgr)
- [MetLife (MET) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/met)
- [Allstate (ALL) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/all)
- [Chubb (CB) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/cb)
- [AON Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/aon)
- [Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/schd)
- [NVIDIA (NVDA) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/nvda)
- [Apple (AAPL) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/aapl)
- [Alphabet (GOOG) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/goog)
- [Microsoft (MSFT) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/msft)
- [Amazon.com (AMZN) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/amzn)

## Explore further

- Full page with charts: https://easycompare.io/research/trv
- All research pages: https://easycompare.io/llms.txt
- Compare the entire market against TRV live: https://betterthanspy.com/?b=TRV&utm_source=easycompare&utm_medium=research