# How Suncor Energy (SU) compares with the whole market and its popular alternatives

> Source: EasyCompare research, https://easycompare.io/research/su
> Data as of October 20, 2026. Total returns include reinvested dividends. Past performance does not predict future results; nothing here is investment advice.

Built by QuantCommons' quantitative engine, this page is about relative opportunity, not data on SU alone. It places SU (Suncor Energy Inc.) against 18 popular alternatives, its neighboring categories and the entire market of over 10,000 U.S.-listed stocks and ETFs, and surfaces what has done better on consistent outperformance, return for the risk taken, behavior in real market crashes and diversification. The result is a clearer view of where SU stands in the market, and of the alternatives worth a closer look.

Period covered: SU's full trading record, from October 1986 through September 2026. All returns include reinvested dividends. Data as of October 20, 2026.

## Key findings

- **Right now:** Over the past 3 months, SU rose 26.8% against 3.9% for the S&P 500 and 3.2% for the Nasdaq 100. Its integrated oil & gas peers were far apart over the past 3 months, from PBR (Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. - Petrobras, up 45.4%) to CVX (Chevron, up 20.0%).
- **Stock or market?:** SU's 26.8% gain over the past 3 months is part of a broader integrated oil & gas rally: the integrated oil & gas ETF XLE (State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF) rose 18.0%, with XOM (Exxonmobil, up 20.7%) and CVX (Chevron, up 20.0%). Last month cut against the tape: SU rose 16.7% while the S&P 500 fell 0.6%.
- **Past 1 to 3 years:** SU has run far ahead of the market, rising 111% over the past year against 15.8% for the S&P 500 and 17.9% for the Nasdaq 100. The same gap shows up over 3 years (161% against 89.3%). SU lagged its integrated oil & gas peers in 2023, then moved up the pack in 2025.
- **Long term:** SU turned $10,000 into $39,500 over the past decade, against $42,100 in the S&P 500. On the flip side, the past 5 years have been the better stretch: SU rose 318% against 81.7% for the S&P 500, after trailing over the decade.
- **In a crash:** Across seven sell-offs, SU has typically fallen 1.7 times as far as the S&P 500. The Covid crash took 65.3% off SU, against 33.7% for the S&P 500. That was more than XOM (Exxonmobil, 47.9%) but less than PBR (Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. - Petrobras, 71.2%).
- **Diversification:** Against the S&P 500, SU has a correlation of 0.19 over 5 years, less closely than 88% of stocks worth at least $300 million. Next to an index fund it is a real diversifier. SU moves far less with the S&P 500 than it used to, with a correlation of 0.19 over the past 5 years against 0.63 in the 5 years before.
- **Better options**
  - **Nearby categories and themes:** INSW (International Seaways, oil & gas) earned more for the risk it took than SU over the past 5 years, and its worst fall in 10 years was 57.4%, against 73.5% for SU.
  - **Whole market:** Few investments have done better on both counts: only two of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than SU with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them MCK (McKesson) and CAH (Cardinal Health).

## How much would $10,000 in SU have grown?

This chart tracks a hypothetical $10,000 investment in SU over the past 29 years, with dividends reinvested, alongside the same amount in the S&P 500, investments that ended ahead of SU over the same span and SU's popular alternatives, among those that traded for the entire period.

- $10,000 invested in SU at the end of September 1997 would have grown to $282,795 by September 2026, more than the $132,907 it would have become in SPY, an S&P 500 fund.
- Five of the eight other investments on the chart ended ahead of SU, and EME finished highest, at $1,635,708.

## SU at a glance

This section summarizes the key facts about the stock, its returns over periods from one to ten years and the risk it has carried, with dividends reinvested throughout.

- SU's deepest decline since it began trading in 1986 was 90.5%, from June 1989 to December 1991. It took 24 months from the low to climb back to its old high.
- SU is trading within 1% of its all-time high.
- Over 29 full calendar years, SU's best was 2009, when it returned 82.6%, and its worst was 2008, when it lost 64.0%. It lost money in eight of those years.

- Type: Stock, Energy (Oil & Gas Integrated)
- Trading since: October 20, 1986
- Market value: $93B
- Volatility (5 years): 32.5%; Sharpe ratio: 1.05
- Worst decline ever: −90.5%, from June 19, 1989 to December 5, 1991; back at its high by December 1, 1993

| Period | SU total return |
| --- | --- |
| 1 month | +16.7% |
| 3 months | +26.8% |
| 6 months | +28.9% |
| year to date | +75.6% |
| 1 year | +111% |
| 3 years | +161% |
| 5 years | +318% |
| 10 years | +295% |

## SU against the whole market

Where SU ranks among every stock and fund, and what across the market has done better.

### How does SU rank among all stocks?

This section ranks SU on return, volatility, risk-adjusted return and worst decline against every stock worth at least $300 million with enough history.

- On return for the risk taken (the Sharpe ratio), SU ranks in the top 2% of the 2,893 stocks worth at least $300 million.

| Measure | SU | Rank |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1-year return | +111% | 144 of 3,287 (top 5%) |
| 3-year return | +161% | 540 of 3,017 (top 18%) |
| 5-year return | +318% | 150 of 2,893 (top 6%) |
| 10-year return | +295% | 601 of 2,202 (top 28%) |
| Volatility, 5 years | 32.5% | 956 of 2,893 (top 34%) |
| Sharpe ratio, 5 years | 1.05 | 72 of 2,893 (top 3%) |
| Worst decline, past 10 years | −73.5% | 1,410 of 2,187 (top 65%) |

### What has beaten SU on both return and risk?

Each dot is an investment, placed by how much it earned a year over the past 5 years (higher is better) and how much its price swung, its volatility (further left is calmer).

- Two stocks worth at least $500 million sit in the green region: each earned more than SU over the past 5 years with smaller price swings. That is fewer than 1% of the 3,633 screened. Few investments beat it on both counts.
- Among those with at least half SU's swings, CAH has the best return for its risk: 42.1% a year at 24.7% volatility, 24% less than SU's 32.5%, and a Sharpe ratio (return above cash per unit of volatility) of 1.55 against 1.05 for SU.

### Is there a better investment than SU?

The table below lists investments that beat SU over the past 5 years on at least one of these measures: a higher annual return with lower volatility, a higher annual return at similar volatility, a similar return with lower volatility, a higher Sharpe ratio with a smaller worst decline, a higher total return in most periods from 3 months to 10 years, or smaller losses in recent market crashes.

- Among SU's popular alternatives, PBR, VLO and PSX were ahead of SU in most short and long periods.
- Looking beyond its popular alternatives, INSW (oil & gas) earned more for the risk it took than SU over the past 5 years, and its worst fall in 10 years was 57.4%, against 73.5% for SU.
- Few investments have done better on both counts: only two of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than SU with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them MCK and CAH.

The 2 strongest of 2 investments that beat SU over the past 5 years, out of 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million.

| Investment | Group | Annual return (5 years) | Volatility | Sharpe | Worst decline (10 years) | 10Y return | Correlation with SU | Better on |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| SU: Suncor Energy Inc. (this page) |  | +33.1% | 32.5% | 1.05 | −73.5% | +295% |  |  |
| [CAH](https://easycompare.io/research/cah): Cardinal Health, Inc. | Health Care Distribution | +42.1% | 24.7% | 1.55 | −46.1% | +349% | -0.07 | Higher return, lower volatility; Higher Sharpe, smaller worst decline; Smaller losses in recent crashes |
| [MCK](https://easycompare.io/research/mck): McKesson Corporation | Health Care Distribution | +38.7% | 25.0% | 1.44 | −38.1% | +586% | 0.29 | Higher return, lower volatility; Higher Sharpe, smaller worst decline; Smaller losses in recent crashes |

## SU against its popular alternatives

The investments people most often weigh against SU, compared period by period and year by year.

### How do SU's risk and return compare with its alternatives?

This map plots each investment's annual return over the past 5 years against its volatility, the size of its typical price swings.

- Only IMO was both more rewarding and calmer than SU over the past 5 years, earning a higher annual return with lower volatility.
- Over the past 5 years, SU returned 33.1% a year, more than the S&P 500's 12.7%, with higher volatility (32.5% against 17.1%).

### Has SU consistently beaten its popular alternatives?

This section compares SU with the investments people most often weigh against it, checking each one over eight periods from one month to ten years.

- Three of the 18 popular alternatives, VLO, PBR and PSX, outperformed SU in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes.
- VLO outperformed SU in every long-term period and in all but one short-term period, the most consistent record in the group.
- VLO earned more for the risk it took than SU (a higher Sharpe ratio) and fell less in its worst decline of the past 10 years.

| Investment | 1Y return | 3Y return | 5Y return | 10Y return | Periods ahead of SU | Verdict | Sharpe |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| SU: Suncor Energy Inc. (this page) | +111% | +161% | +318% | +295% |  |  | 1.05 |
| [VLO](https://easycompare.io/research/vlo): Valero Energy Corporation | +176% | +259% | +524% | +1,061% | 4/5 short-term, 3/3 long-term | all-weather | 1.18 |
| [PBR](https://easycompare.io/research/pbr): Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. - Petrobras | +140% | +132% | +667% | +674% | 5/5 short-term, 2/3 long-term | consistent | 1.28 |
| [PSX](https://easycompare.io/research/psx): Phillips 66 | +130% | +183% | +319% | +430% | 4/5 short-term, 2/3 long-term | consistent | 1.04 |
| [IMO](https://easycompare.io/research/imo): Imperial Oil Limited | +59.7% | +143% | +337% | +430% | 0/5 short-term, 2/3 long-term |  | 1.09 |
| YPF: YPF Sociedad Anónima | +102% | +313% | +971% | +173% | 0/5 short-term, 2/3 long-term |  | 1.14 |
| EC: Ecopetrol S.A. | +112% | +116% | +129% | +401% | 2/5 short-term, 1/3 long-term |  | 0.63 |
| [EQNR](https://easycompare.io/research/eqnr): Equinor ASA | +107% | +73.2% | +141% | +416% | 1/5 short-term, 1/3 long-term |  | 0.69 |
| [CNQ](https://easycompare.io/research/cnq): Canadian Natural Resources Limited | +87.7% | +90.4% | +224% | +433% | 0/5 short-term, 1/3 long-term |  | 0.89 |
| [COP](https://easycompare.io/research/cop): ConocoPhillips | +72.9% | +28.5% | +131% | +379% | 0/5 short-term, 1/3 long-term |  | 0.68 |
| [CVE](https://easycompare.io/research/cve): Cenovus Energy Inc. | +101% | +76.2% | +225% | +163% | 2/5 short-term, 0/3 long-term |  | 0.80 |
| [E](https://easycompare.io/research/e): Eni S.p.A. | +77.9% | +120% | +181% | +278% | 0/5 short-term, 0/3 long-term |  | 0.94 |
| [CVX](https://easycompare.io/research/cvx): Chevron Corporation | +51.9% | +53.4% | +144% | +238% | 0/5 short-term, 0/3 long-term |  | 0.84 |
| [TTE](https://easycompare.io/research/tte): TotalEnergies SE | +55.2% | +60.5% | +129% | +234% | 0/5 short-term, 0/3 long-term |  | 0.78 |
| [SHEL](https://easycompare.io/research/shel): Shell plc | +50.3% | +77.1% | +159% | +233% | 0/5 short-term, 0/3 long-term |  | 0.90 |
| [XOM](https://easycompare.io/research/xom): Exxonmobil Holdings Corporation | +62.4% | +76.7% | +232% | +214% | 0/5 short-term, 0/3 long-term |  | 1.04 |
| [TRP](https://easycompare.io/research/trp): TC Energy Corporation | +24.9% | +136% | +66.7% | +160% | 0/5 short-term, 0/3 long-term |  | 0.58 |
| [BP](https://easycompare.io/research/bp): BP p.l.c. | +56.3% | +46.5% | +110% | +141% | 0/5 short-term, 0/3 long-term |  | 0.66 |
| [ENB](https://easycompare.io/research/enb): Enbridge Inc. | +8.5% | +84.0% | +54.3% | +103% | 0/5 short-term, 0/3 long-term |  | 0.56 |

### How did SU do year by year?

This table shows each investment's total return in every full calendar year since 1997, along with where SU ranked among its popular alternatives each year.

- Ranked against its popular alternatives each year, SU finished in the top quarter in ten of 29 years and in the bottom quarter in three. In 2025, it ranked 5 of 19.
- SU finished ahead of the S&P 500 in 15 of its 29 full calendar years.
- Among its popular alternatives, PSX came out ahead of SU most often, in nine of the 13 years both traded.

| Year | SU | SPY |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2025 | +29.7% | +17.7% |
| 2024 | +16.2% | +24.9% |
| 2023 | +6.0% | +26.2% |
| 2022 | +32.3% | −18.2% |
| 2021 | +55.0% | +28.7% |
| 2020 | −46.6% | +18.3% |
| 2019 | +22.1% | +31.2% |
| 2018 | −21.3% | −4.6% |
| 2017 | +15.8% | +21.7% |
| 2016 | +31.2% | +12.0% |

## Risk and diversification

How SU has fallen, how it held up in crashes beside the S&P 500 and its popular alternatives, and what moves independently of it.

### What were SU's worst declines?

A drawdown is the decline from a peak to the lowest point before a new high.

- In all three of SU's worst declines, the S&P 500 held up better over the same dates.
- Not every decline was the market's doing: SU fell 81.0% from May 2008 to March 2020, while the S&P 500 rose 115%.
- The slowest recovery came after SU fell 81.0% from May 2008 to March 2020; it did not regain that peak until November 2025, six years later.

| Decline | Peak | Low | Back at the high | SPY over the same dates | Market event |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| −90.5% | June 19, 1989 | December 5, 1991 | December 1, 1993 | — |  |
| −81.0% | May 20, 2008 | March 18, 2020 | November 11, 2025 | +115% | 2008 financial crisis |
| −71.2% | November 14, 1986 | December 14, 1987 | May 19, 1989 | — |  |
| −31.0% | October 8, 1997 | January 28, 1999 | April 28, 1999 | +32.1% |  |
| −26.0% | May 2, 2006 | October 3, 2006 | June 4, 2007 | +2.4% |  |

### How did SU do in stock market crashes?

This section measures how far SU, the S&P 500 and each alternative fell from peak to trough during every major market crash since 2000.

- SU fell further than the S&P 500 in eight of the ten crashes it has traded through. The clearest case was the Covid crash, when SU fell 65.3% and the S&P 500 fell 33.7%.
- Among its popular alternatives, PSX held up best, falling less than SU in all six crashes they both traded through.

| Crash | Dates | SU fall | SPY fall |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Dot-com bust | March 10, 2000 to October 9, 2002 | −25.4% | −47.5% |
| Global financial crisis | October 9, 2007 to March 9, 2009 | −79.9% | −55.2% |
| Flash crash | May 6, 2010 to May 7, 2010 | −0.2% | −1.5% |
| Euro debt crisis | July 22, 2011 to October 3, 2011 | −42.2% | −17.9% |
| China devaluation & oil rout | August 10, 2015 to February 11, 2016 | −34.7% | −12.8% |
| Volmageddon | February 2, 2018 to February 9, 2018 | −7.0% | −6.5% |
| Q4 2018 selloff | September 21, 2018 to December 24, 2018 | −34.0% | −19.3% |
| COVID crash | February 19, 2020 to March 23, 2020 | −65.3% | −33.7% |
| 2022 bear market | January 4, 2022 to October 12, 2022 | −36.6% | −24.5% |
| SVB / regional bank stress | March 8, 2023 to March 13, 2023 | −6.4% | −3.4% |

### How closely does SU move with the S&P 500?

Upside capture measures how much of the S&P 500's gains an investment kept in the months the market rose, and downside capture how much of its losses it took in the months the market fell.

- Nine of the 18 popular alternatives had a higher capture ratio (upside capture divided by downside capture) than SU's 1.00, led by PBR, EQNR and SHEL.
- EQNR took just 52% of the S&P 500's losses, against 90% for SU, while still keeping 79% of its gains.
- Over the past 10 years, SU captured 90% of the S&P 500's gains in rising months and 90% of its losses in falling months, with a beta of 0.96. It took about the same share of the market's gains as of its losses.

Measured over the past 10 years of monthly returns against SPY.

| Investment | Upside capture | Downside capture | Beta |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| SU: Suncor Energy Inc. (this page) | 90.0% | 90.0% | 0.96 |
| [VLO](https://easycompare.io/research/vlo): Valero Energy Corporation | 142% | 114% | 1.31 |
| [PBR](https://easycompare.io/research/pbr): Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. - Petrobras | 104% | 63.0% | 0.99 |
| [PSX](https://easycompare.io/research/psx): Phillips 66 | 116% | 122% | 1.16 |
| [IMO](https://easycompare.io/research/imo): Imperial Oil Limited | 110% | 105% | 1.18 |
| YPF: YPF Sociedad Anónima | 144% | 206% | 1.58 |
| EC: Ecopetrol S.A. | 127% | 139% | 1.13 |
| [EQNR](https://easycompare.io/research/eqnr): Equinor ASA | 79.0% | 52.0% | 0.62 |
| [CNQ](https://easycompare.io/research/cnq): Canadian Natural Resources Limited | 110% | 109% | 1.13 |
| [COP](https://easycompare.io/research/cop): ConocoPhillips | 94.0% | 92.0% | 0.91 |
| [CVE](https://easycompare.io/research/cve): Cenovus Energy Inc. | 124% | 173% | 1.69 |
| [E](https://easycompare.io/research/e): Eni S.p.A. | 79.0% | 69.0% | 0.70 |
| [CVX](https://easycompare.io/research/cvx): Chevron Corporation | 86.0% | 94.0% | 0.89 |
| [TTE](https://easycompare.io/research/tte): TotalEnergies SE | 69.0% | 57.0% | 0.51 |
| [SHEL](https://easycompare.io/research/shel): Shell plc | 60.0% | 43.0% | 0.45 |
| [XOM](https://easycompare.io/research/xom): Exxonmobil Holdings Corporation | 78.0% | 83.0% | 0.76 |
| [TRP](https://easycompare.io/research/trp): TC Energy Corporation | 67.0% | 73.0% | 0.72 |
| [BP](https://easycompare.io/research/bp): BP p.l.c. | 58.0% | 62.0% | 0.51 |
| [ENB](https://easycompare.io/research/enb): Enbridge Inc. | 60.0% | 74.0% | 0.73 |

### What diversifies SU?

Correlation measures how closely two investments move together, on a scale from 1 (in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to -1 (in opposite directions).

- Moving a fifth of the money in SU into SMH would have cut the portfolio's volatility by 20% over the past 5 years and raised its annual return (+32.2% for SU alone, +35.6% for the mix).
- Among large ETFs, LVHI, DXJ and SMH have moved largely independently of SU over the past 5 years, with correlations of 0.48 or lower, and each still earned a positive 5-year return.
- CAH made money in five of the eight calendar years in which SU lost money.

| Investment | Correlation with SU | 5Y return | Volatility | Sharpe | Rose in SU's 8 down years |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| LVHI: Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 0.48 | +119% | 11.1% | 1.48 | 0 of 8 |
| DXJ: WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund | 0.11 | +225% | 19.1% | 1.34 | 3 of 8 |
| [SMH](https://easycompare.io/research/smh): VanEck Semiconductor ETF | -0.12 | +323% | 36.9% | 0.97 | 3 of 8 |
| DBEF: Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF | 0.21 | +85.0% | 13.8% | 0.96 | 3 of 8 |
| [GLD](https://easycompare.io/research/gld): SPDR Gold Shares | 0.08 | +126% | 18.9% | 0.96 | 3 of 8 |
| SPMO: Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 0.02 | +136% | 20.8% | 0.93 | 1 of 8 |
| DFIV: Dimensional - International Value ETF | 0.45 | +99.4% | 16.4% | 0.93 | 0 of 8 |
| [VTV](https://easycompare.io/research/vtv): Vanguard Morningstar Value ETF | 0.41 | +76.6% | 13.7% | 0.90 | 3 of 8 |

## Common questions

### What was SU's worst drawdown?

SU's deepest decline since it began trading in 1986 was 90.5%, from June 1989 to December 1991. It took 24 months from the low to climb back to its old high.

### What were SU's best and worst years?

Over 29 full calendar years, SU's best year was 2009, when it returned 82.6%. Its worst was 2008, with a return of -64.0%.

### Is there a better investment than SU?

Among SU's popular alternatives, PBR, VLO and PSX were ahead of SU in most short and long periods. Looking beyond its popular alternatives, INSW (oil & gas) earned more for the risk it took than SU over the past 5 years, and its worst fall in 10 years was 57.4%, against 73.5% for SU.

### Is SU more volatile than the S&P 500?

Yes. SU's volatility over the past 5 years was 32.5%, 1.9 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, SU's return lands within 32.5% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump.

### What is SU's Sharpe ratio?

SU's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 1.05, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so SU earned more for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings.

### How correlated is SU with the S&P 500?

Over the past 5 years, SU's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.19 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They are only loosely linked, which makes it a real diversifier next to an index fund. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against SU instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a SU holding.

### What are the best alternatives to SU?

Of the 18 popular alternatives we compared, three outperformed SU in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes, with dividends reinvested: VLO, PBR and PSX.

### Did SU outperform the S&P 500?

SU finished ahead of the S&P 500 (SPY) in 15 of 29 full calendar years. In 2025, it returned +29.7%, against +17.7% for the index.

### How did SU do in stock market crashes?

SU fell less than the S&P 500 (SPY) in two of the ten major crashes it has traded through, and further in eight. The clearest case was the Covid crash, when SU fell 65.3% and the S&P 500 fell 33.7%.

### What diversifies SU?

These had a low correlation with SU over the past 5 years and still earned a positive 5-year return: among large ETFs, LVHI (correlation 0.48), DXJ (correlation 0.11) and SMH (correlation -0.12); among large stocks, CAH (correlation -0.07), CLS (correlation 0.16) and FIX (correlation 0.17). A correlation near zero means the two have moved largely independently.

## More research

- [Valero Energy (VLO) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/vlo)
- [Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. - Petrobras (PBR) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/pbr)
- [Phillips 66 (PSX) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/psx)
- [Imperial Oil (IMO) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/imo)
- [Equinor ASA (EQNR) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/eqnr)
- [Canadian Natural Resources (CNQ) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/cnq)
- [ConocoPhillips (COP) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/cop)
- [Cenovus Energy (CVE) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/cve)
- [Eni S.p.A. (E) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/e)
- [Chevron (CVX) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/cvx)
- [TotalEnergies (TTE) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/tte)
- [Shell (SHEL) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/shel)

## Explore further

- Full page with charts: https://easycompare.io/research/su
- All research pages: https://easycompare.io/llms.txt
- Compare the entire market against SU live: https://betterthanspy.com/?b=SU&utm_source=easycompare&utm_medium=research