# How VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) compares with the whole market and its popular alternatives

> Source: EasyCompare research, https://easycompare.io/research/smh
> Data as of October 20, 2026. Total returns include reinvested dividends. Past performance does not predict future results; nothing here is investment advice.

Built by QuantCommons' quantitative engine, this page is about relative opportunity, not data on SMH alone. It places SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) against 11 popular alternatives, its neighboring categories and the entire market of over 10,000 U.S.-listed stocks and ETFs, and surfaces what has done better on consistent outperformance, return for the risk taken, behavior in real market crashes and diversification. The result is a clearer view of where SMH stands in the market, and of the alternatives worth a closer look.

Period covered: SMH's full trading record, from May 2000 through September 2026. The crash tests reach back to 2000 using older funds and the S&P 500. All returns include reinvested dividends. Data as of October 20, 2026.

## Key findings

- **What you're buying:** SMH charges 0.35% a year; SOXQ (Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF) tracks the same thing for 0.19%. 100% of SMH sits in technology, against 38% for the S&P 500.
- **Right now:** Over the past 6 months, SMH rose 17.8%, ahead of 96% of the ETFs with at least $100 million in assets. Its similar funds were far apart over the past 6 months, from SOXX (iShares Semiconductor ETF, up 19.9%) to PSI (Invesco Semiconductors ETF, up 3.7%).
- **Fund or market?:** SMH fell 2.2% over the past 3 months even as the S&P 500 rose 3.9%.
- **Long term:** SMH turned $10,000 into $176,000 over the past decade, against $42,100 in the S&P 500. SMH's 10-year return of 1,665% puts it among the best of the ETFs with at least $100 million in assets with that much history. The S&P 500 returned 321%.
- **In a crash:** Across six sell-offs, SMH has typically fallen 1.3 times as far as the S&P 500. In the 2022 bear market, SMH fell 44.1%, against 24.5% for the S&P 500, and more than similar funds such as XSD (State Street SPDR S&P Semiconductor ETF, 40.6%).
- **Diversification:** Over 10 years, SMH's beta versus the S&P 500 was 1.46: in the S&P 500's rising months it gained 1.6 times as much as the index, and in falling months it lost 1.1 times as much. Against the S&P 500, SMH has a correlation of 0.78 over 5 years, more closely than 58% of ETFs with at least $100 million in assets. Next to an index fund it is some diversification, but not a hedge.
- **Better options**
  - **Nearby categories and themes:** DELL (Dell Technologies, computer hardware) and STX (Seagate Technology, computer hardware) were ahead of SMH in most short and long periods, though with much bigger swings (54.4% and 48.7% volatility against 36.9%).
  - **Whole market:** Few investments have done better on both counts: only 13 of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than SMH with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them LLY (Eli Lilly and Company), GE (GE Aerospace) and BBVA (Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria).

## How much would $10,000 in SMH have grown?

This chart tracks a hypothetical $10,000 investment in SMH over the past 25 years, with dividends reinvested, alongside the same amount in the S&P 500, investments that ended ahead of SMH over the same span and SMH's popular alternatives, among those that traded for the entire period.

- $10,000 invested in SMH at the end of September 2001 would have grown to $660,531 by September 2026, more than the $114,557 it would have become in SPY, an S&P 500 fund.
- Five of the eight other investments on the chart ended ahead of SMH, and AAPL finished highest, at $14,356,990.

## SMH at a glance

This section summarizes the key facts about the fund, its returns over periods from one to ten years and the risk it has carried, with dividends reinvested throughout.

- SMH's deepest decline since it began trading in 2000 was 83.8%, from June 2000 to November 2008. It took about eight years from the low to climb back to its old high.
- Over 25 full calendar years, SMH's best was 2003, when it returned 87.3%, and its worst was 2002, when it lost 47.0%. It lost money in eight of those years.
- SMH is 18.3% below its all-time high.

- Type: ETF, Technology (Asset Management)
- Trading since: May 5, 2000
- Assets: $66B
- Expense ratio: 0.35%
- Volatility (5 years): 36.9%; Sharpe ratio: 0.97
- Worst decline ever: −83.8%, from June 21, 2000 to November 20, 2008; back at its high by November 22, 2016

| Period | SMH total return |
| --- | --- |
| 1 month | −8.3% |
| 3 months | −2.2% |
| 6 months | +17.8% |
| year to date | +46.4% |
| 1 year | +57.8% |
| 3 years | +290% |
| 5 years | +323% |
| 10 years | +1,665% |

## SMH against the whole market

Where SMH ranks among every stock and fund, and what across the market has done better.

### How does SMH rank among all ETFs?

This section ranks SMH on return, volatility, risk-adjusted return and worst decline against every ETF worth at least $100 million with enough history.

- SMH's 5-year return ranks in the top 1% of the 1,560 ETFs with at least $100 million in assets with 5 years of history.
- SMH is among the more volatile ETFs: its price swings rank in the bottom 4% of the 1,560 ETFs with at least $100 million in assets, where the top is the calmest.

| Measure | SMH | Rank |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1-year return | +57.8% | 41 of 2,485 (top 2%) |
| 3-year return | +290% | 2 of 1,949 (top 1%) |
| 5-year return | +323% | 1 of 1,560 (top 1%) |
| 10-year return | +1,665% | 2 of 958 (top 1%) |
| Volatility, 5 years | 36.9% | 1,503 of 1,560 (top 97%) |
| Sharpe ratio, 5 years | 0.97 | 145 of 1,560 (top 10%) |
| Worst decline, past 10 years | −45.3% | 714 of 951 (top 76%) |

### What has beaten SMH on both return and risk?

Each dot is an investment, placed by how much it earned a year over the past 5 years (higher is better) and how much its price swung, its volatility (further left is calmer).

- 13 stocks worth at least $500 million sit in the green region: each earned more than SMH over the past 5 years with smaller price swings. That is fewer than 1% of the 3,633 screened. Few investments beat it on both counts.
- Among those with at least half SMH's swings, CAH has the best return for its risk: 42.1% a year at 24.7% volatility, 33% less than SMH's 36.9%, and a Sharpe ratio (return above cash per unit of volatility) of 1.55 against 0.97 for SMH. MPC earned the most, 51.2% a year, while still swinging less than SMH (33.4% against 36.9%).

### Is there a better investment than SMH?

The table below lists investments that beat SMH over the past 5 years on at least one of these measures: a higher annual return with lower volatility, a higher annual return at similar volatility, a similar return with lower volatility, a higher Sharpe ratio with a smaller worst decline, a higher total return in most periods from 3 months to 10 years, or smaller losses in recent market crashes, and, for funds, the same exposure at a lower expense ratio.

- Looking beyond its popular alternatives, DELL (computer hardware) and STX (computer hardware) were ahead of SMH in most short and long periods, though with much bigger swings (54.4% and 48.7% volatility against 36.9%).
- Few investments have done better on both counts: only 13 of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than SMH with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them LLY, GE and BBVA.

The 13 strongest of 13 investments that beat SMH over the past 5 years, out of 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million.

| Investment | Group | Annual return (5 years) | Volatility | Sharpe | Worst decline (10 years) | 10Y return | Correlation with SMH | Better on |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| SMH: VanEck Semiconductor ETF (this page) |  | +33.4% | 36.9% | 0.97 | −45.3% | +1,665% |  |  |
| [LLY](https://easycompare.io/research/lly): Eli Lilly and Company | Pharmaceuticals | +40.7% | 32.8% | 1.21 | −34.5% | +1,807% | 0.16 | Higher return, lower volatility; Higher Sharpe, smaller worst decline; Higher return in most periods |
| [MCK](https://easycompare.io/research/mck): McKesson Corporation | Health Care Distribution | +38.7% | 25.0% | 1.44 | −38.1% | +586% | -0.08 | Higher return, lower volatility; Higher Sharpe, smaller worst decline |
| ESLT: Elbit Systems Ltd. | Aerospace & Defense | +39.8% | 34.6% | 1.15 | −35.4% | +765% | -0.07 | Higher return, lower volatility; Higher Sharpe, smaller worst decline |
| [MPC](https://easycompare.io/research/mpc): Marathon Petroleum Corporation | Oil & Gas | +51.2% | 33.4% | 1.41 | −79.7% | +1,387% | 0.07 | Higher return, lower volatility |
| [HWM](https://easycompare.io/research/hwm): Howmet Aerospace Inc. | Aerospace & Defense | +47.3% | 32.5% | 1.36 | −68.9% | +1,028% | 0.34 | Higher return, lower volatility |
| [CAH](https://easycompare.io/research/cah): Cardinal Health, Inc. | Health Care Distribution | +42.1% | 24.7% | 1.55 | −46.1% | +349% | 0.12 | Higher return, lower volatility |
| [GE](https://easycompare.io/research/ge): GE Aerospace | Aerospace & Defense | +36.0% | 31.0% | 1.15 | −80.9% | +139% | 0.50 | Higher return, lower volatility |
| [BBVA](https://easycompare.io/research/bbva): Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, S.A. | Banks | +38.7% | 33.3% | 1.16 | −69.6% | +542% | 0.16 | Higher return, lower volatility |
| [TRGP](https://easycompare.io/research/trgp): Targa Resources Corp. | Oil & Gas Midstream | +41.8% | 31.7% | 1.27 | −90.8% | +829% | 0.13 | Higher return, lower volatility |
| MLI: Mueller Industries, Inc. | Metal Fabrication | +38.9% | 33.4% | 1.16 | −53.0% | +800% | 0.42 | Higher return, lower volatility |
| MOG-A: Moog Inc. | Aerospace & Defense | +36.6% | 32.0% | 1.14 | −63.7% | +595% | 0.41 | Higher return, lower volatility |
| LAUR: Laureate Education, Inc. | Education Services | +37.5% | 32.8% | 1.14 | −64.5% | — | 0.00 | Higher return, lower volatility |
| NRP: Natural Resource Partners L.P. | Coal | +37.4% | 33.9% | 1.11 | −78.8% | +632% | -0.08 | Higher return, lower volatility |

## SMH against its popular alternatives

The investments people most often weigh against SMH, compared period by period and year by year.

### How do SMH's risk and return compare with its alternatives?

This map plots each investment's annual return over the past 5 years against its volatility, the size of its typical price swings.

- None of the ten popular alternatives earned more than SMH over the past 5 years with smaller price swings, so every higher return on the map came with a bumpier ride.
- Five of the ten popular alternatives earned less than SMH over the past 5 years while swinging more, the weaker corner of the map.
- Over the past 5 years, SMH returned 33.4% a year, more than the S&P 500's 12.7%, with higher volatility (36.9% against 17.1%).

### Has SMH consistently beaten its popular alternatives?

This section compares SMH with the investments people most often weigh against it, checking each one over eight periods from one month to ten years.

- None of the 11 popular alternatives outperformed SMH in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes. The closest was SOXX.

| Investment | 1Y return | 3Y return | 5Y return | 10Y return | Periods ahead of SMH | Verdict | Sharpe |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| SMH: VanEck Semiconductor ETF (this page) | +57.8% | +290% | +323% | +1,665% |  |  | 0.97 |
| [SOXX](https://easycompare.io/research/soxx): iShares Semiconductor ETF | +71.2% | +234% | +237% | +1,392% | 3/5 short-term, 0/3 long-term |  | 0.82 |
| [XLK](https://easycompare.io/research/xlk): State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF | +29.3% | +131% | +143% | +767% | 3/5 short-term, 0/3 long-term |  | 0.82 |
| IGV: iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF | −6.1% | +57.9% | +24.0% | +383% | 3/5 short-term, 0/3 long-term |  | 0.29 |
| PSI: Invesco Semiconductors ETF | +68.1% | +217% | +196% | +1,134% | 2/5 short-term, 0/3 long-term |  | 0.73 |
| FTXL: First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF | +85.1% | +249% | +235% | +1,077% | 2/5 short-term, 0/3 long-term |  | 0.82 |
| [QQQ](https://easycompare.io/research/qqq): Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 | +17.9% | +106% | +97.2% | +553% | 2/5 short-term, 0/3 long-term |  | 0.71 |
| AIQ: Global X - Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF | +23.3% | +141% | +99.6% | — | 2/5 short-term, 0/3 long-term |  | 0.65 |
| SOXQ: Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF | +64.5% | +246% | +248% | — | 2/5 short-term, 0/3 long-term |  | 0.84 |
| SRVR: Pacer Data & Infrastructure Real Estate ETF | −7.7% | +24.4% | −20.3% | — | 1/5 short-term, 0/3 long-term |  | -0.13 |
| XSD: State Street SPDR S&P Semiconductor ETF | +35.0% | +166% | +132% | +857% | 0/5 short-term, 0/3 long-term |  | 0.62 |
| SHOC: Strive U.S. Semiconductor ETF | +50.8% | +222% | — | — | 0/5 short-term, 0/3 long-term |  | — |

### How did SMH do year by year?

This table shows each investment's total return in every full calendar year since 2001, along with where SMH ranked among its popular alternatives each year.

- SMH finished ahead of the S&P 500 in 16 of its 25 full calendar years, and ahead of it in each of the last three.
- None of the nine popular alternatives came out ahead of SMH in most of the years they have in common.
- Ranked against its popular alternatives each year, SMH finished in the top quarter in eight of 24 years and in the bottom quarter in two. In 2025, it ranked 2 of 12.

| Year | SMH | SPY |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2025 | +49.2% | +17.7% |
| 2024 | +39.1% | +24.9% |
| 2023 | +73.4% | +26.2% |
| 2022 | −33.5% | −18.2% |
| 2021 | +42.1% | +28.7% |
| 2020 | +55.5% | +18.3% |
| 2019 | +64.5% | +31.2% |
| 2018 | −9.1% | −4.6% |
| 2017 | +38.5% | +21.7% |
| 2016 | +35.6% | +12.0% |

## Risk and diversification

How SMH has fallen, how it held up in crashes beside the S&P 500 and its popular alternatives, and what moves independently of it.

### What were SMH's worst declines?

A drawdown is the decline from a peak to the lowest point before a new high.

- In all five of SMH's worst declines, the S&P 500 held up better over the same dates.
- The slowest recovery came after SMH fell 83.8% from June 2000 to November 2008; it did not regain that peak until November 2016, eight years later.

| Decline | Peak | Low | Back at the high | SPY over the same dates | Market event |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| −83.8% | June 21, 2000 | November 20, 2008 | November 22, 2016 | −41.4% | dot-com bust |
| −45.3% | December 27, 2021 | October 14, 2022 | July 13, 2023 | −24.2% | 2022 bear market |
| −35.7% | July 10, 2024 | April 8, 2025 | July 2, 2025 | −10.7% |  |
| −33.6% | February 19, 2020 | March 20, 2020 | June 5, 2020 | −32.0% | Covid crash |
| −27.0% | March 12, 2018 | December 24, 2018 | April 3, 2019 | −14.3% | late-2018 sell-off |

### How did SMH do in stock market crashes?

This section measures how far SMH, the S&P 500 and each alternative fell from peak to trough during every major market crash since 2000.

- SMH fell further than the S&P 500 in six of the nine crashes it has traded through. The clearest case was the 2022 bear market, when SMH fell 44.1% and the S&P 500 fell 24.5%.
- Among its popular alternatives, SRVR held up best, falling less than SMH in all four crashes they both traded through.
- SMH began trading after the dot-com bust, but two of its popular alternatives lived through it. The mildest fall among them was XLK's 82.0%, against 47.5% for the S&P 500.

| Crash | Dates | SMH fall | SPY fall |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Dot-com bust | March 10, 2000 to October 9, 2002 | not trading | −47.5% |
| Global financial crisis | October 9, 2007 to March 9, 2009 | −59.2% | −55.2% |
| Flash crash | May 6, 2010 to May 7, 2010 | −1.5% | −1.5% |
| Euro debt crisis | July 22, 2011 to October 3, 2011 | −18.6% | −17.9% |
| China devaluation & oil rout | August 10, 2015 to February 11, 2016 | −17.9% | −12.8% |
| Volmageddon | February 2, 2018 to February 9, 2018 | −7.4% | −6.5% |
| Q4 2018 selloff | September 21, 2018 to December 24, 2018 | −23.5% | −19.3% |
| COVID crash | February 19, 2020 to March 23, 2020 | −33.6% | −33.7% |
| 2022 bear market | January 4, 2022 to October 12, 2022 | −44.1% | −24.5% |
| SVB / regional bank stress | March 8, 2023 to March 13, 2023 | −3.6% | −3.4% |

### How closely does SMH move with the S&P 500?

Upside capture measures how much of the S&P 500's gains an investment kept in the months the market rose, and downside capture how much of its losses it took in the months the market fell.

- None of the seven popular alternatives with the same record had a higher capture ratio (upside capture divided by downside capture) than SMH's 1.47.
- Over the past 10 years, SMH captured 159% of the S&P 500's gains in rising months and 108% of its losses in falling months, with a beta of 1.46. It amplified the market's moves in both directions.
- XLK took just 100% of the S&P 500's losses, against 108% for SMH, while still keeping 128% of its gains.

Measured over the past 10 years of monthly returns against SPY.

| Investment | Upside capture | Downside capture | Beta |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| SMH: VanEck Semiconductor ETF (this page) | 159% | 108% | 1.46 |
| [SOXX](https://easycompare.io/research/soxx): iShares Semiconductor ETF | 156% | 112% | 1.50 |
| [XLK](https://easycompare.io/research/xlk): State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF | 128% | 100% | 1.19 |
| IGV: iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF | 112% | 114% | 1.10 |
| PSI: Invesco Semiconductors ETF | 150% | 110% | 1.54 |
| FTXL: First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF | 146% | 108% | 1.47 |
| [QQQ](https://easycompare.io/research/qqq): Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 | 118% | 102% | 1.13 |
| XSD: State Street SPDR S&P Semiconductor ETF | 151% | 133% | 1.65 |

### What diversifies SMH?

Correlation measures how closely two investments move together, on a scale from 1 (in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to -1 (in opposite directions).

- Moving a fifth of the money in SMH into MCK would have cut the portfolio's volatility by 20% over the past 5 years and raised its annual return (+37.4% for SMH alone, +38.8% for the mix).
- Among large ETFs, LVHI, DXJ and EMLP have moved largely independently of SMH over the past 5 years, with correlations of 0.47 or lower, and each still earned a positive 5-year return.
- Among large stocks, CAH, MCK and MPC have moved largely independently of SMH over the past 5 years, with correlations of 0.12 or lower, and each still earned a positive 5-year return.

| Investment | Correlation with SMH | 5Y return | Volatility | Sharpe | Rose in SMH's 8 down years |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| LVHI: Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 0.27 | +119% | 11.1% | 1.48 | 1 of 8 |
| DXJ: WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund | 0.47 | +225% | 19.1% | 1.34 | 2 of 8 |
| EMLP: First Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund | 0.26 | +101% | 14.5% | 1.04 | 1 of 8 |
| EWP: iShares MSCI Spain ETF | 0.34 | +140% | 20.3% | 0.97 | 2 of 8 |
| [GLD](https://easycompare.io/research/gld): SPDR Gold Shares | 0.07 | +126% | 18.9% | 0.96 | 2 of 8 |
| [XLE](https://easycompare.io/research/xle): State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | -0.02 | +177% | 25.5% | 0.93 | 3 of 8 |
| AMLP: Alerian MLP ETF | 0.12 | +111% | 18.9% | 0.89 | 1 of 8 |
| EFV: iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF | 0.39 | +89.0% | 15.9% | 0.88 | 1 of 8 |

## Common questions

### What was SMH's worst drawdown?

SMH's deepest decline since it began trading in 2000 was 83.8%, from June 2000 to November 2008. It took about eight years from the low to climb back to its old high.

### What were SMH's best and worst years?

Over 25 full calendar years, SMH's best year was 2003, when it returned 87.3%. Its worst was 2002, with a return of -47.0%.

### Is there a better investment than SMH?

Looking beyond its popular alternatives, DELL (computer hardware) and STX (computer hardware) were ahead of SMH in most short and long periods, though with much bigger swings (54.4% and 48.7% volatility against 36.9%). Few investments have done better on both counts: only 13 of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than SMH with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them LLY, GE and BBVA.

### Is SMH more volatile than the S&P 500?

Yes. SMH's volatility over the past 5 years was 36.9%, 2.2 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, SMH's return lands within 36.9% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump.

### What is SMH's Sharpe ratio?

SMH's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.97, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so SMH earned more for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings.

### How correlated is SMH with the S&P 500?

Over the past 5 years, SMH's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.78 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They often move together: some diversification next to an index fund, but not a cushion. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against SMH instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a SMH holding.

### What are the best alternatives to SMH?

None of the 11 popular alternatives we compared outperformed SMH in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes, which says more about SMH's strength than about its alternatives.

### Did SMH outperform the S&P 500?

SMH finished ahead of the S&P 500 (SPY) in 16 of 25 full calendar years. In 2025, it returned +49.2%, against +17.7% for the index.

### How did SMH do in stock market crashes?

SMH fell less than the S&P 500 (SPY) in none of the nine major crashes it has traded through, and further in six. The clearest case was the 2022 bear market, when SMH fell 44.1% and the S&P 500 fell 24.5%.

### What diversifies SMH?

These had a low correlation with SMH over the past 5 years and still earned a positive 5-year return: among large ETFs, LVHI (correlation 0.27), DXJ (correlation 0.47) and EMLP (correlation 0.26); among large stocks, CAH (correlation 0.12), MCK (correlation -0.08) and MPC (correlation 0.07). A correlation near zero means the two have moved largely independently.

## More research

- [iShares Semiconductor ETF (SOXX) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/soxx)
- [State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/xlk)
- [Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/qqq)
- [Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/schd)
- [NVIDIA (NVDA) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/nvda)
- [Apple (AAPL) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/aapl)
- [Alphabet (GOOG) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/goog)
- [Microsoft (MSFT) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/msft)
- [Amazon.com (AMZN) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/amzn)
- [Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/vti)
- [Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing (TSM) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/tsm)
- [Space Exploration Technologies (SPCX) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/spcx)

## Explore further

- Full page with charts: https://easycompare.io/research/smh
- All research pages: https://easycompare.io/llms.txt
- Compare the entire market against SMH live: https://betterthanspy.com/?b=SMH&utm_source=easycompare&utm_medium=research