# How Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group (SMFG) compares with the whole market and its popular alternatives

> Source: EasyCompare research, https://easycompare.io/research/smfg
> Data as of October 20, 2026. Total returns include reinvested dividends. Past performance does not predict future results; nothing here is investment advice.

Built by QuantCommons' quantitative engine, this page is about relative opportunity, not data on SMFG alone. It places SMFG (Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc.) against 19 popular alternatives, its neighboring categories and the entire market of over 10,000 U.S.-listed stocks and ETFs, and surfaces what has done better on consistent outperformance, return for the risk taken, behavior in real market crashes and diversification. The result is a clearer view of where SMFG stands in the market, and of the alternatives worth a closer look.

Period covered: SMFG's full trading record, from January 2006 through September 2026. The crash tests reach back to 2000 using older funds and the S&P 500. All returns include reinvested dividends. Data as of October 20, 2026.

## Key findings

- **Right now:** SMFG has outpaced the market, rising 15.9% over the past 6 months against 9.1% for the S&P 500 and 11.2% for the Nasdaq 100. Its bank peers were far apart over the past 6 months, from BNS (Bank of Nova Scotia, up 22.4%) to HSBC (up 2.3%).
- **Stock or market?:** SMFG fell 1.3% over the past 3 months, in line with the banks ETF IXG (iShares Global Financials ETF), which fell 0.2%. The S&P 500 rose 3.9%. Its bank peers did not move as one over the past 3 months: BBVA (Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria) rose 3.1%, while UBS (UBS Group) fell 8.3%.
- **Past 1 to 3 years:** Over the past year, SMFG rose 53.5% against 15.8% for the S&P 500 and 17.9% for the Nasdaq 100. The same gap shows up over 3 years (181% against 89.3%). SMFG finished ahead of the S&P 500 in both 2024 and 2025.
- **Long term:** SMFG turned $10,000 into $57,400 over the past decade, against $42,100 in the S&P 500. SMFG's 10-year return of 474% puts it ahead of 85% of the stocks worth at least $300 million with that much history. The S&P 500 returned 321%.
- **In a crash:** Across six sell-offs, SMFG has typically fallen 1.5 times as far as the S&P 500. On the flip side, in the 2022 bear market, SMFG held up better than its bank peers, including HSBC, RY and MUFG.
- **Diversification:** Against the S&P 500, SMFG has a correlation of 0.28 over 5 years, less closely than 74% of stocks worth at least $300 million. Next to an index fund it is a real diversifier. SMFG moves far less with the S&P 500 than it used to, with a correlation of 0.28 over the past 5 years against 0.63 in the 5 years before.
- **Better options**
  - **Nearby categories and themes:** VIRT (Virtu Financial, capital markets) was ahead of SMFG in most short and long periods.
  - **Whole market:** Few investments have done better on both counts: only two of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than SMFG with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them MCK (McKesson) and CAH (Cardinal Health).

## How much would $10,000 in SMFG have grown?

This chart tracks a hypothetical $10,000 investment in SMFG over the past 20 years, with dividends reinvested, alongside the same amount in the S&P 500, investments that ended ahead of SMFG over the same span and SMFG's popular alternatives, among those that traded for the entire period.

- $10,000 invested in SMFG at the end of September 2006 would have grown to $26,278 by September 2026, less than the $82,294 it would have become in SPY, an S&P 500 fund.
- Five of the eight other investments on the chart ended ahead of SMFG, and JPM finished highest, at $117,399.

## SMFG at a glance

This section summarizes the key facts about the stock, its returns over periods from one to ten years and the risk it has carried, with dividends reinvested throughout.

- SMFG's deepest decline since it began trading in 2006 was 76.8%, from April 2006 to March 2009. It took about 15 years from the low to climb back to its old high.
- Over 19 full calendar years, SMFG's best was 2024, when it returned 54.8%, and its worst was 2008, when it lost 43.6%. It lost money in seven of those years.
- SMFG is 10.8% below its all-time high.

- Type: Stock, Financials (Banks - Diversified)
- Trading since: January 27, 2006
- Market value: $94B
- Volatility (5 years): 29.4%; Sharpe ratio: 1.14
- Worst decline ever: −76.8%, from April 10, 2006 to March 9, 2009; back at its high by March 7, 2024

| Period | SMFG total return |
| --- | --- |
| 1 month | −7.9% |
| 3 months | −1.3% |
| 6 months | +15.9% |
| year to date | +28.3% |
| 1 year | +53.5% |
| 3 years | +181% |
| 5 years | +327% |
| 10 years | +474% |

## SMFG against the whole market

Where SMFG ranks among every stock and fund, and what across the market has done better.

### How does SMFG rank among all stocks?

This section ranks SMFG on return, volatility, risk-adjusted return and worst decline against every stock worth at least $300 million with enough history.

- On return for the risk taken (the Sharpe ratio), SMFG ranks in the top 1% of the 2,893 stocks worth at least $300 million.

| Measure | SMFG | Rank |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1-year return | +53.5% | 504 of 3,287 (top 16%) |
| 3-year return | +181% | 462 of 3,017 (top 16%) |
| 5-year return | +327% | 141 of 2,893 (top 5%) |
| 10-year return | +474% | 330 of 2,202 (top 15%) |
| Volatility, 5 years | 29.4% | 666 of 2,893 (top 24%) |
| Sharpe ratio, 5 years | 1.14 | 37 of 2,893 (top 2%) |
| Worst decline, past 10 years | −47.6% | 363 of 2,187 (top 17%) |

### What has beaten SMFG on both return and risk?

Each dot is an investment, placed by how much it earned a year over the past 5 years (higher is better) and how much its price swung, its volatility (further left is calmer).

- Two stocks worth at least $500 million sit in the green region: each earned more than SMFG over the past 5 years with smaller price swings. That is fewer than 1% of the 3,633 screened. Few investments beat it on both counts.
- Among those with at least half SMFG's swings, CAH has the best return for its risk: 42.1% a year at 24.7% volatility, 16% less than SMFG's 29.4%, and a Sharpe ratio (return above cash per unit of volatility) of 1.55 against 1.14 for SMFG.

### Is there a better investment than SMFG?

The table below lists investments that beat SMFG over the past 5 years on at least one of these measures: a higher annual return with lower volatility, a higher annual return at similar volatility, a similar return with lower volatility, a higher Sharpe ratio with a smaller worst decline, a higher total return in most periods from 3 months to 10 years, or smaller losses in recent market crashes.

- Looking beyond its popular alternatives, VIRT (capital markets) was ahead of SMFG in most short and long periods.
- Few investments have done better on both counts: only two of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than SMFG with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them MCK and CAH.

The 2 strongest of 2 investments that beat SMFG over the past 5 years, out of 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million.

| Investment | Group | Annual return (5 years) | Volatility | Sharpe | Worst decline (10 years) | 10Y return | Correlation with SMFG | Better on |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| SMFG: Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc. (this page) |  | +33.7% | 29.4% | 1.14 | −47.6% | +474% |  |  |
| [MCK](https://easycompare.io/research/mck): McKesson Corporation | Health Care Distribution | +38.7% | 25.0% | 1.44 | −38.1% | +586% | 0.26 | Higher return, lower volatility; Higher Sharpe, smaller worst decline; Higher return in most periods |
| [CAH](https://easycompare.io/research/cah): Cardinal Health, Inc. | Health Care Distribution | +42.1% | 24.7% | 1.55 | −46.1% | +349% | 0.11 | Higher return, lower volatility; Higher return in most periods |

## SMFG against its popular alternatives

The investments people most often weigh against SMFG, compared period by period and year by year.

### How do SMFG's risk and return compare with its alternatives?

This map plots each investment's annual return over the past 5 years against its volatility, the size of its typical price swings.

- None of the 19 popular alternatives earned more than SMFG over the past 5 years with smaller price swings, so every higher return on the map came with a bumpier ride.
- Over the past 5 years, SMFG returned 33.7% a year, more than the S&P 500's 12.7%, with higher volatility (29.4% against 17.1%).

### Has SMFG consistently beaten its popular alternatives?

This section compares SMFG with the investments people most often weigh against it, checking each one over eight periods from one month to ten years.

- None of the 19 popular alternatives outperformed SMFG in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes. The closest was BBVA.
- BBVA outperformed SMFG over all three long-term periods but in only one of the five short-term ones, so SMFG has had the better of it lately.

| Investment | 1Y return | 3Y return | 5Y return | 10Y return | Periods ahead of SMFG | Verdict | Sharpe |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| SMFG: Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc. (this page) | +53.5% | +181% | +327% | +474% |  |  | 1.14 |
| [BBVA](https://easycompare.io/research/bbva): Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, S.A. | +35.2% | +281% | +413% | +542% | 1/5 short-term, 3/3 long-term |  | 1.16 |
| [JPM](https://easycompare.io/research/jpm): JPMorgan Chase & Co. | +13.0% | +150% | +122% | +537% | 2/5 short-term, 1/3 long-term |  | 0.78 |
| [MFG](https://easycompare.io/research/mfg): Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. | +53.1% | +216% | +326% | +345% | 2/5 short-term, 1/3 long-term |  | 1.10 |
| [CM](https://easycompare.io/research/cm): Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce | +44.4% | +261% | +141% | +395% | 1/5 short-term, 1/3 long-term |  | 0.93 |
| [ING](https://easycompare.io/research/ing): ING Groep N.V. | +42.5% | +209% | +201% | +339% | 1/5 short-term, 1/3 long-term |  | 0.87 |
| [SAN](https://easycompare.io/research/san): Banco Santander, S.A. | +35.9% | +305% | +295% | +332% | 0/5 short-term, 1/3 long-term |  | 0.99 |
| [HSBC](https://easycompare.io/research/hsbc): HSBC Holdings plc | +47.7% | +201% | +318% | +319% | 0/5 short-term, 1/3 long-term |  | 1.24 |
| [BCS](https://easycompare.io/research/bcs): Barclays PLC | +15.1% | +242% | +134% | +238% | 0/5 short-term, 1/3 long-term |  | 0.67 |
| [LYG](https://easycompare.io/research/lyg): Lloyds Banking Group plc | +22.4% | +207% | +152% | +213% | 0/5 short-term, 1/3 long-term |  | 0.74 |
| [DB](https://easycompare.io/research/db): Deutsche Bank AG | −3.1% | +244% | +171% | +165% | 0/5 short-term, 1/3 long-term |  | 0.72 |
| [MUFG](https://easycompare.io/research/mufg): Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc. | +41.3% | +184% | +319% | +483% | 4/5 short-term, 0/3 long-term |  | 1.13 |
| [TD](https://easycompare.io/research/td): The Toronto-Dominion Bank | +57.5% | +141% | +109% | +310% | 4/5 short-term, 0/3 long-term |  | 0.84 |
| [BNS](https://easycompare.io/research/bns): The Bank of Nova Scotia | +50.0% | +162% | +83.1% | +187% | 3/5 short-term, 0/3 long-term |  | 0.71 |
| [BMO](https://easycompare.io/research/bmo): Bank of Montreal | +37.6% | +146% | +89.4% | +295% | 2/5 short-term, 0/3 long-term |  | 0.71 |
| [IX](https://easycompare.io/research/ix): ORIX Corporation | +50.8% | +128% | +128% | +284% | 2/5 short-term, 0/3 long-term |  | 0.78 |
| EWJ: iShares MSCI Japan ETF | +19.2% | +79.1% | +55.6% | +132% | 2/5 short-term, 0/3 long-term |  | 0.57 |
| [RY](https://easycompare.io/research/ry): Royal Bank of Canada | +39.2% | +173% | +122% | +352% | 1/5 short-term, 0/3 long-term |  | 0.97 |
| [UBS](https://easycompare.io/research/ubs): UBS Group AG | +26.3% | +116% | +210% | +374% | 0/5 short-term, 0/3 long-term |  | 0.90 |
| NMR: Nomura Holdings, Inc. | +28.2% | +162% | +120% | +179% | 0/5 short-term, 0/3 long-term |  | 0.68 |

### How did SMFG do year by year?

This table shows each investment's total return in every full calendar year since 2007, along with where SMFG ranked among its popular alternatives each year.

- SMFG finished ahead of the S&P 500 in seven of its 19 full calendar years, and ahead of it in each of the last two.
- Among its popular alternatives, CM came out ahead of SMFG most often, in 13 of the 19 years both traded.
- Ranked against its popular alternatives each year, SMFG finished in the top quarter in four of 19 years and in the bottom quarter in four. In 2025, it ranked 18 of 20.

| Year | SMFG | SPY |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2025 | +38.0% | +17.7% |
| 2024 | +54.8% | +24.9% |
| 2023 | +25.7% | +26.2% |
| 2022 | +24.5% | −18.2% |
| 2021 | +18.6% | +28.7% |
| 2020 | −10.9% | +18.3% |
| 2019 | +19.4% | +31.2% |
| 2018 | −22.2% | −4.6% |
| 2017 | +18.0% | +21.7% |
| 2016 | +5.2% | +12.0% |

## Risk and diversification

How SMFG has fallen, how it held up in crashes beside the S&P 500 and its popular alternatives, and what moves independently of it.

### What were SMFG's worst declines?

A drawdown is the decline from a peak to the lowest point before a new high.

- In all five of SMFG's worst declines, the S&P 500 held up better over the same dates.
- The slowest recovery came after SMFG fell 76.8% from April 2006 to March 2009; it did not regain that peak until March 2024, 15 years later.

| Decline | Peak | Low | Back at the high | SPY over the same dates | Market event |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| −76.8% | April 10, 2006 | March 9, 2009 | March 7, 2024 | −44.5% | 2008 financial crisis |
| −25.7% | March 21, 2025 | April 7, 2025 | August 14, 2025 | −10.6% |  |
| −21.4% | July 31, 2024 | August 6, 2024 | November 14, 2024 | −5.2% |  |
| −20.1% | February 13, 2026 | March 30, 2026 | June 4, 2026 | −7.0% |  |
| −11.1% | January 31, 2006 | February 13, 2006 | April 10, 2006 | −0.9% |  |

### How did SMFG do in stock market crashes?

This section measures how far SMFG, the S&P 500 and each alternative fell from peak to trough during every major market crash since 2000.

- SMFG fell further than the S&P 500 in six of the nine crashes it has traded through. The clearest case was the 2015 China and oil sell-off, when SMFG fell 44.2% and the S&P 500 fell 12.8%.
- Among its popular alternatives, EWJ held up best, falling less than SMFG in seven of the nine crashes they both traded through.
- SMFG began trading after the dot-com bust, but 16 of its popular alternatives lived through it. The mildest fall among them was RY's 21.6%, against 47.5% for the S&P 500.

| Crash | Dates | SMFG fall | SPY fall |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Dot-com bust | March 10, 2000 to October 9, 2002 | not trading | −47.5% |
| Global financial crisis | October 9, 2007 to March 9, 2009 | −70.9% | −55.2% |
| Flash crash | May 6, 2010 to May 7, 2010 | −2.2% | −1.5% |
| Euro debt crisis | July 22, 2011 to October 3, 2011 | −19.8% | −17.9% |
| China devaluation & oil rout | August 10, 2015 to February 11, 2016 | −44.2% | −12.8% |
| Volmageddon | February 2, 2018 to February 9, 2018 | −4.5% | −6.5% |
| Q4 2018 selloff | September 21, 2018 to December 24, 2018 | −23.2% | −19.3% |
| COVID crash | February 19, 2020 to March 23, 2020 | −32.2% | −33.7% |
| 2022 bear market | January 4, 2022 to October 12, 2022 | −24.7% | −24.5% |
| SVB / regional bank stress | March 8, 2023 to March 13, 2023 | −9.2% | −3.4% |

### How closely does SMFG move with the S&P 500?

Upside capture measures how much of the S&P 500's gains an investment kept in the months the market rose, and downside capture how much of its losses it took in the months the market fell.

- Over the past 10 years, SMFG captured 84% of the S&P 500's gains in rising months and 43% of its losses in falling months, with a beta of 0.65. That is a defensive profile: it gave up some of the market's upside in exchange for smaller losses.
- Only MUFG had a higher capture ratio (upside capture divided by downside capture) than SMFG's 1.94, out of 19 popular alternatives with the same record.

Measured over the past 10 years of monthly returns against SPY.

| Investment | Upside capture | Downside capture | Beta |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| SMFG: Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc. (this page) | 84.0% | 43.0% | 0.65 |
| [BBVA](https://easycompare.io/research/bbva): Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, S.A. | 121% | 97.0% | 1.11 |
| [JPM](https://easycompare.io/research/jpm): JPMorgan Chase & Co. | 117% | 103% | 1.09 |
| [MFG](https://easycompare.io/research/mfg): Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. | 75.0% | 42.0% | 0.54 |
| [CM](https://easycompare.io/research/cm): Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce | 108% | 106% | 1.07 |
| [ING](https://easycompare.io/research/ing): ING Groep N.V. | 136% | 155% | 1.36 |
| [SAN](https://easycompare.io/research/san): Banco Santander, S.A. | 101% | 92.0% | 1.02 |
| [HSBC](https://easycompare.io/research/hsbc): HSBC Holdings plc | 79.0% | 53.0% | 0.58 |
| [BCS](https://easycompare.io/research/bcs): Barclays PLC | 113% | 131% | 1.26 |
| [LYG](https://easycompare.io/research/lyg): Lloyds Banking Group plc | 106% | 130% | 1.20 |
| [DB](https://easycompare.io/research/db): Deutsche Bank AG | 102% | 118% | 1.21 |
| [MUFG](https://easycompare.io/research/mufg): Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc. | 84.0% | 42.0% | 0.66 |
| [TD](https://easycompare.io/research/td): The Toronto-Dominion Bank | 89.0% | 80.0% | 0.88 |
| [BNS](https://easycompare.io/research/bns): The Bank of Nova Scotia | 97.0% | 120% | 1.05 |
| [BMO](https://easycompare.io/research/bmo): Bank of Montreal | 104% | 112% | 1.12 |
| [IX](https://easycompare.io/research/ix): ORIX Corporation | 84.0% | 75.0% | 0.86 |
| EWJ: iShares MSCI Japan ETF | 65.0% | 71.0% | 0.67 |
| [RY](https://easycompare.io/research/ry): Royal Bank of Canada | 97.0% | 88.0% | 0.88 |
| [UBS](https://easycompare.io/research/ubs): UBS Group AG | 116% | 120% | 1.18 |
| NMR: Nomura Holdings, Inc. | 81.0% | 82.0% | 0.76 |

### What diversifies SMFG?

Correlation measures how closely two investments move together, on a scale from 1 (in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to -1 (in opposite directions).

- Moving a fifth of the money in SMFG into CAH would have cut the portfolio's volatility by 15% over the past 5 years and raised its annual return (+35.0% for SMFG alone, +36.7% for the mix).
- GLD made money in five of the seven calendar years in which SMFG lost money.
- Among large ETFs, DXJ, EMLP and HDV have moved largely independently of SMFG over the past 5 years, with correlations of 0.38 or lower, and each still earned a positive 5-year return.

| Investment | Correlation with SMFG | 5Y return | Volatility | Sharpe | Rose in SMFG's 7 down years |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| DXJ: WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund | 0.38 | +225% | 19.1% | 1.34 | 3 of 7 |
| EMLP: First Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund | 0.33 | +101% | 14.5% | 1.04 | 1 of 7 |
| HDV: iShares Core High Dividend ETF | 0.37 | +83.3% | 13.0% | 1.00 | 1 of 7 |
| [SMH](https://easycompare.io/research/smh): VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.23 | +323% | 36.9% | 0.97 | 5 of 7 |
| DBEF: Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF | 0.43 | +85.0% | 13.8% | 0.96 | 2 of 7 |
| [GLD](https://easycompare.io/research/gld): SPDR Gold Shares | 0.15 | +126% | 18.9% | 0.96 | 5 of 7 |
| SPMO: Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 0.21 | +136% | 20.8% | 0.93 | 1 of 7 |
| [XLE](https://easycompare.io/research/xle): State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | 0.21 | +177% | 25.5% | 0.93 | 3 of 7 |

## Common questions

### What was SMFG's worst drawdown?

SMFG's deepest decline since it began trading in 2006 was 76.8%, from April 2006 to March 2009. It took about 15 years from the low to climb back to its old high. Because SMFG launched in January 2006, that record does not include the dot-com bust.

### What were SMFG's best and worst years?

Over 19 full calendar years, SMFG's best year was 2024, when it returned 54.8%. Its worst was 2008, with a return of -43.6%.

### Is there a better investment than SMFG?

Looking beyond its popular alternatives, VIRT (capital markets) was ahead of SMFG in most short and long periods. Few investments have done better on both counts: only two of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than SMFG with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them MCK and CAH.

### Is SMFG more volatile than the S&P 500?

Yes. SMFG's volatility over the past 5 years was 29.4%, 1.7 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, SMFG's return lands within 29.4% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump.

### What is SMFG's Sharpe ratio?

SMFG's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 1.14, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so SMFG earned more for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings.

### How correlated is SMFG with the S&P 500?

Over the past 5 years, SMFG's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.28 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They are only loosely linked, which makes it a real diversifier next to an index fund. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against SMFG instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a SMFG holding.

### What are the best alternatives to SMFG?

None of the 19 popular alternatives we compared outperformed SMFG in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes, which says more about SMFG's strength than about its alternatives.

### Did SMFG outperform the S&P 500?

SMFG finished ahead of the S&P 500 (SPY) in seven of 19 full calendar years. In 2025, it returned +38.1%, against +17.7% for the index.

### How did SMFG do in stock market crashes?

SMFG fell less than the S&P 500 (SPY) in two of the nine major crashes it has traded through, and further in six. The clearest case was the 2015 China and oil sell-off, when SMFG fell 44.2% and the S&P 500 fell 12.8%.

### What diversifies SMFG?

These had a low correlation with SMFG over the past 5 years and still earned a positive 5-year return: among large ETFs, DXJ (correlation 0.38), EMLP (correlation 0.33) and HDV (correlation 0.37); among large stocks, CAH (correlation 0.11), CLS (correlation 0.18) and FIX (correlation 0.09). A correlation near zero means the two have moved largely independently.

## More research

- [Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria (BBVA) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/bbva)
- [JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/jpm)
- [Mizuho Financial Group (MFG) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/mfg)
- [Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce (CM) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/cm)
- [ING Groep (ING) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/ing)
- [Banco Santander (SAN) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/san)
- [HSBC Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/hsbc)
- [Barclays (BCS) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/bcs)
- [Lloyds Banking Group (LYG) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/lyg)
- [Deutsche Bank (DB) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/db)
- [Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group (MUFG) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/mufg)
- [Toronto-Dominion Bank (TD) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/td)

## Explore further

- Full page with charts: https://easycompare.io/research/smfg
- All research pages: https://easycompare.io/llms.txt
- Compare the entire market against SMFG live: https://betterthanspy.com/?b=SMFG&utm_source=easycompare&utm_medium=research