# How Royal Caribbean Cruises (RCL) compares with the whole market and its popular alternatives

> Source: EasyCompare research, https://easycompare.io/research/rcl
> Data as of October 20, 2026. Total returns include reinvested dividends. Past performance does not predict future results; nothing here is investment advice.

Built by QuantCommons' quantitative engine, this page is about relative opportunity, not data on RCL alone. It places RCL (Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd.) against 9 popular alternatives, its neighboring categories and the entire market of over 10,000 U.S.-listed stocks and ETFs, and surfaces what has done better on consistent outperformance, return for the risk taken, behavior in real market crashes and diversification. The result is a clearer view of where RCL stands in the market, and of the alternatives worth a closer look.

Period covered: RCL's full trading record, from April 1993 through September 2026. All returns include reinvested dividends. Data as of October 20, 2026.

## Key findings

- **Right now:** Its cruise line peers split over the past 6 months: LIND (Lindblad Expeditions) rose 75.1%, while NCLH (Norwegian Cruise Line) fell 22.8%. Over the past 6 months, RCL rose 3.1% against 9.1% for the S&P 500 and 11.2% for the Nasdaq 100.
- **Stock or market?:** RCL rose 1.2% over the past 3 months, in line with the consumer discretionary sector ETF XLY (State Street Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR ETF), which rose 1.0%. The S&P 500 rose 3.9%. Last month cut against the tape: RCL rose 15.0% while the S&P 500 fell 0.6%.
- **Past 1 to 3 years:** RCL has gone against the market, falling 3.1% over the past year while the S&P 500 rose 15.8%. RCL led its cruise line peers in 2023, then fell behind VIK (Viking) and LIND (Lindblad Expeditions) in 2025.
- **Long term:** RCL turned $10,000 into $45,900 over the past decade, against $42,100 in the S&P 500. RCL's 10-year return of 359% puts it ahead of 79% of the stocks worth at least $300 million with that much history. The S&P 500 returned 321%.
- **In a crash:** Across seven sell-offs, RCL has typically fallen 2.1 times as far as the S&P 500. The Covid crash took 79.7% off RCL, against 33.7% for the S&P 500. That was more than CCL (Carnival Corporation & plc, 78.3%) but less than NCLH (Norwegian Cruise Line, 85.1%).
- **Diversification:** RCL is some diversification, but not a hedge: a correlation of 0.57 with the S&P 500 over 5 years and 0.60 with the total US market, more closely than 86% of stocks worth at least $300 million.
- **Better options**
  - **Popular alternatives:** MAR (Marriott International) fell less than RCL in each recent sell-off and kept up with it over the past decade.
  - **Nearby categories and themes:** HLT (Hilton Worldwide, hotels & resorts) and IHG (InterContinental Hotels Group, hotels & resorts) fell less than RCL in each recent sell-off and kept up with it over the past decade.
  - **Whole market:** 85 of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than RCL with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them TSM (Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing), AVGO (Broadcom) and LLY (Eli Lilly and Company).

## How much would $10,000 in RCL have grown?

This chart tracks a hypothetical $10,000 investment in RCL over the past 27 years, with dividends reinvested, alongside the same amount in the S&P 500, investments that ended ahead of RCL over the same span and RCL's popular alternatives, among those that traded for the entire period.

- $10,000 invested in RCL at the end of September 1999 would have grown to $85,956 by September 2026, less than the $95,018 it would have become in SPY, an S&P 500 fund.
- Five of the seven other investments on the chart ended ahead of RCL, and TSM finished highest, at $782,499.

## RCL at a glance

This section summarizes the key facts about the stock, its returns over periods from one to ten years and the risk it has carried, with dividends reinvested throughout.

- RCL's deepest decline since it began trading in 1993 was 89.5%, from December 2004 to March 2009. It took about five years from the low to climb back to its old high.
- Over 29 full calendar years, RCL's best was 2023, when it returned 162%, and its worst was 2008, when it lost 67.1%. It lost money in ten of those years.
- RCL is 19.5% below its all-time high.

- Type: Stock, Consumer Discretionary (Travel Services)
- Trading since: April 28, 1993
- Market value: $77B
- Volatility (5 years): 48.4%; Sharpe ratio: 0.77
- Worst decline ever: −89.5%, from December 28, 2004 to March 2, 2009; back at its high by January 30, 2014

| Period | RCL total return |
| --- | --- |
| 1 month | +15.0% |
| 3 months | +1.2% |
| 6 months | +3.1% |
| year to date | +3.3% |
| 1 year | −3.1% |
| 3 years | +272% |
| 5 years | +255% |
| 10 years | +359% |

## RCL against the whole market

Where RCL ranks among every stock and fund, and what across the market has done better.

### How does RCL rank among all stocks?

This section ranks RCL on return, volatility, risk-adjusted return and worst decline against every stock worth at least $300 million with enough history.

- RCL's 5-year return ranks in the top 8% of the 2,893 stocks worth at least $300 million with 5 years of history.
- RCL's worst decline of the past 10 years ranks in the bottom 20% of the 2,187 stocks worth at least $300 million, where the top fell the least.

| Measure | RCL | Rank |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1-year return | −3.1% | 2,113 of 3,287 (top 65%) |
| 3-year return | +272% | 262 of 3,017 (top 9%) |
| 5-year return | +255% | 220 of 2,893 (top 8%) |
| 10-year return | +359% | 471 of 2,202 (top 22%) |
| Volatility, 5 years | 48.4% | 1,853 of 2,893 (top 65%) |
| Sharpe ratio, 5 years | 0.77 | 335 of 2,893 (top 12%) |
| Worst decline, past 10 years | −83.3% | 1,741 of 2,187 (top 80%) |

### What has beaten RCL on both return and risk?

Each dot is an investment, placed by how much it earned a year over the past 5 years (higher is better) and how much its price swung, its volatility (further left is calmer).

- 84 stocks and one ETF worth at least $500 million sit in the green region: each earned more than RCL over the past 5 years with smaller price swings. That is 2% of the 3,633 screened.
- Among those with at least half RCL's swings, CAH has the best return for its risk: 42.1% a year at 24.7% volatility, 49% less than RCL's 48.4%, and a Sharpe ratio (return above cash per unit of volatility) of 1.55 against 0.77 for RCL. ATI earned the most, 61.8% a year, while still swinging less than RCL (42.9% against 48.4%).

### Is there a better investment than RCL?

The table below lists investments that beat RCL over the past 5 years on at least one of these measures: a higher annual return with lower volatility, a higher annual return at similar volatility, a similar return with lower volatility, a higher Sharpe ratio with a smaller worst decline, a higher total return in most periods from 3 months to 10 years, or smaller losses in recent market crashes.

- Among RCL's popular alternatives, MAR fell less than RCL in each recent sell-off and kept up with it over the past decade.
- Looking beyond its popular alternatives, HLT (hotels & resorts) and IHG (hotels & resorts) fell less than RCL in each recent sell-off and kept up with it over the past decade.
- Across the whole market, 85 of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than RCL with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them TSM, AVGO and LLY.

The 15 strongest of 85 investments that beat RCL over the past 5 years, out of 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million.

| Investment | Group | Annual return (5 years) | Volatility | Sharpe | Worst decline (10 years) | 10Y return | Correlation with RCL | Better on |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| RCL: Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. (this page) |  | +28.8% | 48.4% | 0.77 | −83.3% | +359% |  |  |
| [TSM](https://easycompare.io/research/tsm): Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited | Semiconductors | +31.5% | 38.5% | 0.91 | −56.6% | +1,505% | 0.37 | Higher return, lower volatility; Higher Sharpe, smaller worst decline; Higher return in most periods; Smaller losses in recent crashes |
| [LLY](https://easycompare.io/research/lly): Eli Lilly and Company | Pharmaceuticals | +40.7% | 32.8% | 1.21 | −34.5% | +1,807% | -0.05 | Higher return, lower volatility; Higher Sharpe, smaller worst decline; Higher return in most periods; Smaller losses in recent crashes |
| [MCK](https://easycompare.io/research/mck): McKesson Corporation | Health Care Distribution | +38.7% | 25.0% | 1.44 | −38.1% | +586% | 0.12 | Higher return, lower volatility; Higher Sharpe, smaller worst decline; Higher return in most periods; Smaller losses in recent crashes |
| [APH](https://easycompare.io/research/aph): Amphenol Corporation | Electronic Components | +33.8% | 32.2% | 1.07 | −37.5% | +965% | 0.46 | Higher return, lower volatility; Higher Sharpe, smaller worst decline; Higher return in most periods; Smaller losses in recent crashes |
| [ASX](https://easycompare.io/research/asx): ASE Technology Holding Co., Ltd. | Semiconductors | +48.8% | 43.0% | 1.15 | −52.5% | +967% | 0.28 | Higher return, lower volatility; Higher Sharpe, smaller worst decline; Higher return in most periods; Smaller losses in recent crashes |
| [IMO](https://easycompare.io/research/imo): Imperial Oil Limited | Integrated Oil & Gas | +34.3% | 32.0% | 1.09 | −77.1% | +430% | 0.31 | Higher return, lower volatility; Higher Sharpe, smaller worst decline; Higher return in most periods; Smaller losses in recent crashes |
| [SMH](https://easycompare.io/research/smh): VanEck Semiconductor ETF | Semiconductors | +33.4% | 36.9% | 0.97 | −45.3% | +1,665% | 0.40 | Higher return, lower volatility; Higher Sharpe, smaller worst decline; Higher return in most periods; Smaller losses in recent crashes |
| [PBR-A](https://easycompare.io/research/pbr-a): Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. - Petrobras | Integrated Oil & Gas | +51.8% | 37.5% | 1.31 | −71.7% | +768% | 0.24 | Higher return, lower volatility; Higher Sharpe, smaller worst decline; Higher return in most periods |
| COKE: Coca-Cola Consolidated, Inc. | Food & Beverages | +41.2% | 38.0% | 1.10 | −51.7% | +1,569% | -0.03 | Higher return, lower volatility; Higher Sharpe, smaller worst decline; Higher return in most periods; Smaller losses in recent crashes |
| NHC: National HealthCare Corporation | Medical - Care Facilities | +32.0% | 28.5% | 1.12 | −35.3% | +394% | 0.17 | Higher return, lower volatility; Higher Sharpe, smaller worst decline; Higher return in most periods; Smaller losses in recent crashes |
| [MUFG](https://easycompare.io/research/mufg): Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc. | Banks | +33.2% | 29.4% | 1.13 | −54.9% | +483% | 0.30 | Higher return, lower volatility; Higher Sharpe, smaller worst decline; Higher return in most periods |
| UFPT: UFP Technologies, Inc. | Medical - Devices | +35.8% | 46.0% | 0.90 | −48.3% | +1,006% | 0.27 | Higher return, lower volatility; Higher Sharpe, smaller worst decline; Higher return in most periods; Smaller losses in recent crashes |
| [PBR](https://easycompare.io/research/pbr): Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. - Petrobras | Integrated Oil & Gas | +50.3% | 37.5% | 1.28 | −75.3% | +674% | 0.23 | Higher return, lower volatility; Higher Sharpe, smaller worst decline; Higher return in most periods |
| [SAN](https://easycompare.io/research/san): Banco Santander, S.A. | Banks | +31.7% | 33.9% | 0.99 | −73.8% | +332% | 0.41 | Higher return, lower volatility; Higher Sharpe, smaller worst decline; Higher return in most periods |
| [BBVA](https://easycompare.io/research/bbva): Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, S.A. | Banks | +38.7% | 33.3% | 1.16 | −69.6% | +542% | 0.45 | Higher return, lower volatility; Higher Sharpe, smaller worst decline; Higher return in most periods |

## RCL against its popular alternatives

The investments people most often weigh against RCL, compared period by period and year by year.

### How do RCL's risk and return compare with its alternatives?

This map plots each investment's annual return over the past 5 years against its volatility, the size of its typical price swings.

- None of the eight popular alternatives earned more than RCL over the past 5 years with smaller price swings, so every higher return on the map came with a bumpier ride.
- Four of the eight popular alternatives earned less than RCL over the past 5 years while swinging more, the weaker corner of the map.
- Over the past 5 years, RCL returned 28.8% a year, more than the S&P 500's 12.7%, with higher volatility (48.4% against 17.1%).

### Has RCL consistently beaten its popular alternatives?

This section compares RCL with the investments people most often weigh against it, checking each one over eight periods from one month to ten years.

- None of the nine popular alternatives outperformed RCL in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes. The closest was MAR.
- MAR earned more for the risk it took than RCL (a higher Sharpe ratio) and fell less in its worst decline of the past 10 years.

| Investment | 1Y return | 3Y return | 5Y return | 10Y return | Periods ahead of RCL | Verdict | Sharpe |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| RCL: Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. (this page) | −3.1% | +272% | +255% | +359% |  |  | 0.77 |
| [MAR](https://easycompare.io/research/mar): Marriott International, Inc. | +54.1% | +117% | +170% | +544% | 5/5 short-term, 1/3 long-term |  | 0.84 |
| LIND: Lindblad Expeditions Holdings, Inc. | +195% | +477% | +139% | +317% | 5/5 short-term, 1/3 long-term |  | 0.59 |
| EXPE: Expedia Group, Inc. | +38.8% | +226% | +86.3% | +154% | 4/5 short-term, 0/3 long-term |  | 0.50 |
| [DIS](https://easycompare.io/research/dis): The Walt Disney Company | +1.2% | +39.3% | −32.5% | +31.7% | 3/5 short-term, 0/3 long-term |  | -0.12 |
| CCL: Carnival Corporation & plc | −4.7% | +149% | +22.6% | −34.6% | 2/5 short-term, 0/3 long-term |  | 0.35 |
| [VIK](https://easycompare.io/research/vik): Viking Holdings Ltd | +43.5% | — | — | — | 2/5 short-term, 0/3 long-term |  | — |
| AAL: American Airlines Group Inc. | −0.5% | +9.3% | −38.0% | −69.0% | 1/5 short-term, 0/3 long-term |  | 0.04 |
| [BKNG](https://easycompare.io/research/bkng): Booking Holdings Inc. | −19.6% | +52.2% | +75.9% | +186% | 0/5 short-term, 0/3 long-term |  | 0.51 |
| NCLH: Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. | −32.7% | +15.2% | −38.9% | −59.6% | 0/5 short-term, 0/3 long-term |  | 0.12 |

### How did RCL do year by year?

This table shows each investment's total return in every full calendar year since 1997, along with where RCL ranked among its popular alternatives each year.

- RCL finished ahead of the S&P 500 in 17 of its 29 full calendar years, and ahead of it in each of the last three.
- None of the eight popular alternatives came out ahead of RCL in most of the years they have in common.
- Ranked against its popular alternatives each year, RCL finished in the top quarter in ten of 26 years and in the bottom quarter in three. In 2025, it ranked 4 of 10.

| Year | RCL | SPY |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2025 | +22.5% | +17.7% |
| 2024 | +79.0% | +24.9% |
| 2023 | +162% | +26.2% |
| 2022 | −35.7% | −18.2% |
| 2021 | +3.0% | +28.7% |
| 2020 | −43.5% | +18.3% |
| 2019 | +39.9% | +31.2% |
| 2018 | −16.1% | −4.6% |
| 2017 | +48.2% | +21.7% |
| 2016 | −17.1% | +12.0% |

## Risk and diversification

How RCL has fallen, how it held up in crashes beside the S&P 500 and its popular alternatives, and what moves independently of it.

### What were RCL's worst declines?

A drawdown is the decline from a peak to the lowest point before a new high.

- In all five of RCL's worst declines, the S&P 500 held up better over the same dates.
- Not every decline was the market's doing: RCL fell 35.6% from December 2015 to September 2016, while the S&P 500 rose 5.2%.
- The slowest recovery came after RCL fell 89.5% from December 2004 to March 2009; it did not regain that peak until January 2014, five years later.

| Decline | Peak | Low | Back at the high | SPY over the same dates | Market event |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| −89.5% | December 28, 2004 | March 2, 2009 | January 30, 2014 | −37.0% | 2008 financial crisis |
| −84.4% | November 16, 1999 | October 23, 2001 | December 3, 2004 | −21.2% | dot-com bust |
| −83.3% | January 17, 2020 | March 18, 2020 | March 20, 2024 | −27.7% | Covid crash |
| −58.6% | July 20, 1998 | October 8, 1998 | June 10, 1999 | −18.2% |  |
| −35.6% | December 30, 2015 | September 19, 2016 | March 28, 2017 | +5.2% | 2015 China and oil sell-off |

### How did RCL do in stock market crashes?

This section measures how far RCL, the S&P 500 and each alternative fell from peak to trough during every major market crash since 2000.

- RCL fell further than the S&P 500 in nine of the ten crashes it has traded through. The clearest case was the Covid crash, when RCL fell 79.7% and the S&P 500 fell 33.7%.
- Among its popular alternatives, MAR held up best, falling less than RCL in nine of the ten crashes they both traded through.

| Crash | Dates | RCL fall | SPY fall |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Dot-com bust | March 10, 2000 to October 9, 2002 | −72.3% | −47.5% |
| Global financial crisis | October 9, 2007 to March 9, 2009 | −87.2% | −55.2% |
| Flash crash | May 6, 2010 to May 7, 2010 | −4.3% | −1.5% |
| Euro debt crisis | July 22, 2011 to October 3, 2011 | −45.1% | −17.9% |
| China devaluation & oil rout | August 10, 2015 to February 11, 2016 | −35.5% | −12.8% |
| Volmageddon | February 2, 2018 to February 9, 2018 | −5.6% | −6.5% |
| Q4 2018 selloff | September 21, 2018 to December 24, 2018 | −31.5% | −19.3% |
| COVID crash | February 19, 2020 to March 23, 2020 | −79.7% | −33.7% |
| 2022 bear market | January 4, 2022 to October 12, 2022 | −64.5% | −24.5% |
| SVB / regional bank stress | March 8, 2023 to March 13, 2023 | −11.1% | −3.4% |

### How closely does RCL move with the S&P 500?

Upside capture measures how much of the S&P 500's gains an investment kept in the months the market rose, and downside capture how much of its losses it took in the months the market fell.

- Only MAR and BKNG had a higher capture ratio (upside capture divided by downside capture) than RCL's 0.74, out of eight popular alternatives with the same record.
- Over the past 10 years, RCL captured 171% of the S&P 500's gains in rising months and 231% of its losses in falling months, with a beta of 2.24. It amplified the market's moves in both directions.

Measured over the past 10 years of monthly returns against SPY.

| Investment | Upside capture | Downside capture | Beta |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| RCL: Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. (this page) | 171% | 231% | 2.24 |
| [MAR](https://easycompare.io/research/mar): Marriott International, Inc. | 132% | 137% | 1.46 |
| LIND: Lindblad Expeditions Holdings, Inc. | 175% | 246% | 2.35 |
| EXPE: Expedia Group, Inc. | 104% | 144% | 1.48 |
| [DIS](https://easycompare.io/research/dis): The Walt Disney Company | 90.0% | 162% | 1.32 |
| CCL: Carnival Corporation & plc | 135% | 289% | 2.30 |
| AAL: American Airlines Group Inc. | 70.0% | 199% | 1.53 |
| [BKNG](https://easycompare.io/research/bkng): Booking Holdings Inc. | 99.0% | 123% | 1.17 |
| NCLH: Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. | 128% | 301% | 2.32 |

### What diversifies RCL?

Correlation measures how closely two investments move together, on a scale from 1 (in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to -1 (in opposite directions).

- Moving a fifth of the money in RCL into GLD would have cut the portfolio's volatility by 20% over the past 5 years and raised its annual return (+25.3% for RCL alone, +26.7% for the mix).
- Among large ETFs, LVHI, DXJ and EMLP have moved largely independently of RCL over the past 5 years, with correlations of 0.42 or lower, and each still earned a positive 5-year return.
- FIX made money in seven of the ten calendar years in which RCL lost money.

| Investment | Correlation with RCL | 5Y return | Volatility | Sharpe | Rose in RCL's 10 down years |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| LVHI: Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 0.42 | +119% | 11.1% | 1.48 | 1 of 10 |
| DXJ: WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund | 0.40 | +225% | 19.1% | 1.34 | 3 of 10 |
| EMLP: First Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund | 0.42 | +101% | 14.5% | 1.04 | 2 of 10 |
| FTLS: First Trust Long/Short Equity ETF | 0.46 | +62.9% | 10.4% | 0.99 | 2 of 10 |
| [SMH](https://easycompare.io/research/smh): VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.40 | +323% | 36.9% | 0.97 | 4 of 10 |
| [GLD](https://easycompare.io/research/gld): SPDR Gold Shares | 0.00 | +126% | 18.9% | 0.96 | 6 of 10 |
| IOO: iShares Global 100 ETF | 0.48 | +107% | 17.2% | 0.94 | 4 of 10 |
| SPMO: Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 0.43 | +136% | 20.8% | 0.93 | 2 of 10 |

## Common questions

### What was RCL's worst drawdown?

RCL's deepest decline since it began trading in 1993 was 89.5%, from December 2004 to March 2009. It took about five years from the low to climb back to its old high.

### What were RCL's best and worst years?

Over 29 full calendar years, RCL's best year was 2023, when it returned 162%. Its worst was 2008, with a return of -67.1%.

### Is there a better investment than RCL?

Among RCL's popular alternatives, MAR fell less than RCL in each recent sell-off and kept up with it over the past decade. Looking beyond its popular alternatives, HLT (hotels & resorts) and IHG (hotels & resorts) fell less than RCL in each recent sell-off and kept up with it over the past decade.

### Is RCL more volatile than the S&P 500?

Yes. RCL's volatility over the past 5 years was 48.4%, 2.8 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, RCL's return lands within 48.4% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump.

### What is RCL's Sharpe ratio?

RCL's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.77, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so RCL earned less for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings.

### How correlated is RCL with the S&P 500?

Over the past 5 years, RCL's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.57 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They often move together: some diversification next to an index fund, but not a cushion. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against RCL instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a RCL holding.

### What are the best alternatives to RCL?

None of the nine popular alternatives we compared outperformed RCL in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes, which says more about RCL's strength than about its alternatives.

### Did RCL outperform the S&P 500?

RCL finished ahead of the S&P 500 (SPY) in 17 of 29 full calendar years. In 2025, it returned +22.5%, against +17.7% for the index.

### How did RCL do in stock market crashes?

RCL fell less than the S&P 500 (SPY) in one of the ten major crashes it has traded through, and further in nine. The clearest case was the Covid crash, when RCL fell 79.7% and the S&P 500 fell 33.7%.

### What diversifies RCL?

These had a low correlation with RCL over the past 5 years and still earned a positive 5-year return: among large ETFs, LVHI (correlation 0.42), DXJ (correlation 0.40) and EMLP (correlation 0.42); among large stocks, CAH (correlation 0.35), CLS (correlation 0.38) and FIX (correlation 0.28). A correlation near zero means the two have moved largely independently.

## More research

- [Marriott International (MAR) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/mar)
- [Walt Disney (DIS) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/dis)
- [Viking (VIK) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/vik)
- [Booking (BKNG) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/bkng)
- [Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/schd)
- [NVIDIA (NVDA) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/nvda)
- [Apple (AAPL) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/aapl)
- [Alphabet (GOOG) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/goog)
- [Microsoft (MSFT) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/msft)
- [Amazon.com (AMZN) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/amzn)
- [Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/vti)
- [Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing (TSM) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/tsm)

## Explore further

- Full page with charts: https://easycompare.io/research/rcl
- All research pages: https://easycompare.io/llms.txt
- Compare the entire market against RCL live: https://betterthanspy.com/?b=RCL&utm_source=easycompare&utm_medium=research