# How Quanta Services (PWR) compares with the whole market and its popular alternatives

> Source: EasyCompare research, https://easycompare.io/research/pwr
> Data as of October 20, 2026. Total returns include reinvested dividends. Past performance does not predict future results; nothing here is investment advice.

Built by QuantCommons' quantitative engine, this page is about relative opportunity, not data on PWR alone. It places PWR (Quanta Services, Inc.) against 20+ popular alternatives, its neighboring categories and the entire market of over 10,000 U.S.-listed stocks and ETFs, and surfaces what has done better on consistent outperformance, return for the risk taken, behavior in real market crashes and diversification. The result is a clearer view of where PWR stands in the market, and of the alternatives worth a closer look.

Period covered: PWR's full trading record, from February 1998 through September 2026. All returns include reinvested dividends. Data as of October 20, 2026.

## Key findings

- **Right now:** PWR is 24.1% below its high, bear-market territory, while the S&P 500 sits 1.3% below a record. PWR has gone against the market, falling 1.5% over the past 6 months while the S&P 500 rose 9.1%.
- **Stock or market?:** Beta versus the S&P 500 is 1.26, which would have pointed to 4.9% over the past 3 months. PWR fell 5.8% instead. Its engineering & construction peers did not move as one over the past 3 months: TTEK (Tetra Tech) rose 12.0%, while MTZ (MasTec) fell 44.3%.
- **Past 1 to 3 years:** Over the past year, PWR rose 35.3% against 15.8% for the S&P 500 and 17.9% for the Nasdaq 100. The same gap shows up over 3 years (263% against 89.3%). PWR finished ahead of the S&P 500 in both 2024 and 2025.
- **Long term:** PWR turned $10,000 into $215,000 over the past decade, against $42,100 in the S&P 500. PWR's 10-year return of 2,045% puts it ahead of 98% of the stocks worth at least $300 million with that much history. The S&P 500 returned 321%.
- **In a crash:** PWR fell harder than the S&P 500 in six of seven sell-offs. The 2022 bear market was the exception: PWR fell 21.7%, less than the S&P 500's 24.5%.
- **Diversification:** Against the S&P 500, PWR has a correlation of 0.58 over 5 years, more closely than 88% of stocks worth at least $300 million. Next to an index fund it is some diversification, but not a hedge. Over 10 years, PWR's beta versus the S&P 500 was 1.22: in the S&P 500's rising months it gained 1.4 times as much as the index, and in falling months it lost 61% as much.
- **Better options**
  - **Popular alternatives:** EME (EMCOR Group) earned more than PWR with less volatility over the past 5 years: 43.0% a year at 35.3% volatility, against 39.3% a year at 37.2%.
  - **Whole market:** Few investments have done better on both counts: only six of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than PWR with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them LLY (Eli Lilly and Company), MPC (Marathon Petroleum) and HWM (Howmet Aerospace).

## How much would $10,000 in PWR have grown?

This chart tracks a hypothetical $10,000 investment in PWR over the past 28 years, with dividends reinvested, alongside the same amount in the S&P 500, investments that ended ahead of PWR over the same span and PWR's popular alternatives, among those that traded for the entire period.

- $10,000 invested in PWR at the end of September 1998 would have grown to $797,952 by September 2026, more than the $121,630 it would have become in SPY, an S&P 500 fund.
- Five of the eight other investments on the chart ended ahead of PWR, and AAPL finished highest, at $11,681,338.

## PWR at a glance

This section summarizes the key facts about the stock, its returns over periods from one to ten years and the risk it has carried, with dividends reinvested throughout.

- PWR is still 24.1% below its all-time high.
- PWR's deepest decline since it began trading in 1998 was 97.1%, from June 2000 to October 2002. It took about 18 years from the low to climb back to its old high.
- Over 27 full calendar years, PWR's best was 2003, when it returned 109%, and its worst was 2002, when it lost 77.3%. It lost money in seven of those years.

- Type: Stock, Industrials (Engineering & Construction)
- Trading since: February 12, 1998
- Market value: $90B
- Volatility (5 years): 37.2%; Sharpe ratio: 1.08
- Worst decline ever: −97.1%, from June 16, 2000 to October 7, 2002; back at its high by October 15, 2020

| Period | PWR total return |
| --- | --- |
| 1 month | −7.2% |
| 3 months | −5.8% |
| 6 months | −1.5% |
| year to date | +35.6% |
| 1 year | +35.3% |
| 3 years | +263% |
| 5 years | +425% |
| 10 years | +2,045% |

## PWR against the whole market

Where PWR ranks among every stock and fund, and what across the market has done better.

### How does PWR rank among all stocks?

This section ranks PWR on return, volatility, risk-adjusted return and worst decline against every stock worth at least $300 million with enough history.

- PWR's 10-year return ranks in the top 2% of the 2,202 stocks worth at least $300 million with 10 years of history.

| Measure | PWR | Rank |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1-year return | +35.3% | 842 of 3,287 (top 26%) |
| 3-year return | +263% | 276 of 3,017 (top 10%) |
| 5-year return | +425% | 89 of 2,893 (top 4%) |
| 10-year return | +2,045% | 37 of 2,202 (top 2%) |
| Volatility, 5 years | 37.2% | 1,280 of 2,893 (top 45%) |
| Sharpe ratio, 5 years | 1.08 | 57 of 2,893 (top 2%) |
| Worst decline, past 10 years | −45.5% | 307 of 2,187 (top 15%) |

### What has beaten PWR on both return and risk?

Each dot is an investment, placed by how much it earned a year over the past 5 years (higher is better) and how much its price swung, its volatility (further left is calmer).

- Six stocks worth at least $500 million sit in the green region: each earned more than PWR over the past 5 years with smaller price swings. That is fewer than 1% of the 3,633 screened. Few investments beat it on both counts.
- Among those with at least half PWR's swings, CAH has the best return for its risk: 42.1% a year at 24.7% volatility, 33% less than PWR's 37.2%, and a Sharpe ratio (return above cash per unit of volatility) of 1.55 against 1.08 for PWR. MPC earned the most, 51.2% a year, while still swinging less than PWR (33.4% against 37.2%).
- Among PWR's popular alternatives, EME is in the region. EME earned 43.0% a year against 39.3% a year for PWR, at 35.3% volatility, 5% less than PWR's 37.2%.

### Is there a better investment than PWR?

The table below lists investments that beat PWR over the past 5 years on at least one of these measures: a higher annual return with lower volatility, a higher annual return at similar volatility, a similar return with lower volatility, a higher Sharpe ratio with a smaller worst decline, a higher total return in most periods from 3 months to 10 years, or smaller losses in recent market crashes.

- Among PWR's popular alternatives, EME earned more than PWR with less volatility over the past 5 years: 43.0% a year at 35.3% volatility, against 39.3% a year at 37.2%.
- Few investments have done better on both counts: only six of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than PWR with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them LLY, MPC and HWM.

The 6 strongest of 6 investments that beat PWR over the past 5 years, out of 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million.

| Investment | Group | Annual return (5 years) | Volatility | Sharpe | Worst decline (10 years) | 10Y return | Correlation with PWR | Better on |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| PWR: Quanta Services, Inc. (this page) |  | +39.3% | 37.2% | 1.08 | −45.5% | +2,045% |  |  |
| [LLY](https://easycompare.io/research/lly): Eli Lilly and Company | Pharmaceuticals | +40.7% | 32.8% | 1.21 | −34.5% | +1,807% | 0.07 | Higher return, lower volatility; Higher Sharpe, smaller worst decline |
| [MPC](https://easycompare.io/research/mpc): Marathon Petroleum Corporation | Oil & Gas | +51.2% | 33.4% | 1.41 | −79.7% | +1,387% | 0.10 | Higher return, lower volatility |
| [HWM](https://easycompare.io/research/hwm): Howmet Aerospace Inc. | Aerospace & Defense | +47.3% | 32.5% | 1.36 | −68.9% | +1,028% | 0.51 | Higher return, lower volatility |
| [CAH](https://easycompare.io/research/cah): Cardinal Health, Inc. | Health Care Distribution | +42.1% | 24.7% | 1.55 | −46.1% | +349% | 0.18 | Higher return, lower volatility |
| [TRGP](https://easycompare.io/research/trgp): Targa Resources Corp. | Oil & Gas Midstream | +41.8% | 31.7% | 1.27 | −90.8% | +829% | 0.26 | Higher return, lower volatility |
| EME: EMCOR Group, Inc. | Engineering & Construction | +43.0% | 35.3% | 1.20 | −48.0% | +1,202% | 0.69 | Higher return, lower volatility |

## PWR against its popular alternatives

The investments people most often weigh against PWR, compared period by period and year by year.

### How do PWR's risk and return compare with its alternatives?

This map plots each investment's annual return over the past 5 years against its volatility, the size of its typical price swings.

- Only EME was both more rewarding and calmer than PWR over the past 5 years, earning a higher annual return with lower volatility.
- Over the past 5 years, PWR returned 39.3% a year, more than the S&P 500's 12.7%, with higher volatility (37.2% against 17.1%).

### Has PWR consistently beaten its popular alternatives?

This section compares PWR with the investments people most often weigh against it, checking each one over eight periods from one month to ten years.

- None of the 22 popular alternatives outperformed PWR in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes. The closest was FIX.
- STRL outperformed PWR over all three long-term periods but in none of the five short-term ones, so PWR has had the better of it lately.

| Investment | 1Y return | 3Y return | 5Y return | 10Y return | Periods ahead of PWR | Verdict | Sharpe |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| PWR: Quanta Services, Inc. (this page) | +35.3% | +263% | +425% | +2,045% |  |  | 1.08 |
| [FIX](https://easycompare.io/research/fix): Comfort Systems USA, Inc. | +67.3% | +819% | +1,636% | +5,305% | 2/5 short-term, 3/3 long-term |  | 1.46 |
| STRL: Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. | +11.7% | +489% | +1,708% | +5,213% | 0/5 short-term, 3/3 long-term |  | 1.26 |
| IESC: IES Holdings, Inc. | +22.8% | +692% | +900% | +2,943% | 0/5 short-term, 3/3 long-term |  | 1.09 |
| TPC: Tutor Perini Corporation | +16.5% | +1,024% | +488% | +309% | 1/5 short-term, 2/3 long-term |  | 0.91 |
| [VRT](https://easycompare.io/research/vrt): Vertiv Holdings Co | +16.0% | +456% | +772% | — | 0/5 short-term, 2/3 long-term |  | 1.01 |
| EME: EMCOR Group, Inc. | +0.5% | +267% | +499% | +1,202% | 0/5 short-term, 1/3 long-term |  | 1.20 |
| TTEK: Tetra Tech, Inc. | +5.6% | +13.7% | +11.6% | +388% | 3/5 short-term, 0/3 long-term |  | 0.23 |
| J: Jacobs Solutions Inc. | −13.2% | +31.1% | +29.6% | +266% | 3/5 short-term, 0/3 long-term |  | 0.33 |
| KBR: KBR, Inc. | −13.9% | −35.0% | −8.9% | +189% | 3/5 short-term, 0/3 long-term |  | 0.08 |
| HUBB: Hubbell Incorporated | +7.7% | +70.6% | +159% | +442% | 2/5 short-term, 0/3 long-term |  | 0.79 |
| STN: Stantec Inc. | −37.8% | +15.0% | +43.7% | +240% | 2/5 short-term, 0/3 long-term |  | 0.41 |
| [DUK](https://easycompare.io/research/duk): Duke Energy Corporation | −2.6% | +56.1% | +43.9% | +132% | 2/5 short-term, 0/3 long-term |  | 0.50 |
| APG: APi Group Corporation | +14.8% | +137% | +182% | — | 2/5 short-term, 0/3 long-term |  | 0.81 |
| [GEV](https://easycompare.io/research/gev): GE Vernova Inc. | +50.1% | — | — | — | 2/5 short-term, 0/3 long-term |  | — |
| MYRG: MYR Group Inc. | +31.2% | +116% | +166% | +828% | 1/5 short-term, 0/3 long-term |  | 0.67 |
| [ETN](https://easycompare.io/research/etn): Eaton Corporation plc | +2.3% | +104% | +153% | +657% | 1/5 short-term, 0/3 long-term |  | 0.74 |
| PRIM: Primoris Services Corporation | −48.0% | +142% | +174% | +297% | 1/5 short-term, 0/3 long-term |  | 0.68 |
| GVA: Granite Construction Incorporated | +4.1% | +216% | +191% | +186% | 1/5 short-term, 0/3 long-term |  | 0.85 |
| ACM: Aecom | −55.1% | −21.6% | −4.7% | +128% | 1/5 short-term, 0/3 long-term |  | 0.10 |
| MTZ: MasTec, Inc. | −8.7% | +206% | +114% | +542% | 0/5 short-term, 0/3 long-term |  | 0.57 |
| DY: Dycom Industries, Inc. | −15.0% | +198% | +230% | +197% | 0/5 short-term, 0/3 long-term |  | 0.76 |
| FLR: Fluor Corporation | −5.6% | +30.2% | +147% | −0.9% | 0/5 short-term, 0/3 long-term |  | 0.63 |

### How did PWR do year by year?

This table shows each investment's total return in every full calendar year since 1999, along with where PWR ranked among its popular alternatives each year.

- PWR finished ahead of the S&P 500 in 17 of its 27 full calendar years, and ahead of it in each of the last seven.
- Ranked against its popular alternatives each year, PWR finished in the top quarter in nine of 27 years and in the bottom quarter in four. In 2025, it ranked 13 of 23.
- Among its popular alternatives, MTZ came out ahead of PWR most often, in 16 of the 27 years both traded.

| Year | PWR | SPY |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2025 | +33.7% | +17.7% |
| 2024 | +46.6% | +24.9% |
| 2023 | +51.7% | +26.2% |
| 2022 | +24.6% | −18.2% |
| 2021 | +59.5% | +28.7% |
| 2020 | +77.8% | +18.3% |
| 2019 | +35.8% | +31.2% |
| 2018 | −22.9% | −4.6% |
| 2017 | +12.2% | +21.7% |
| 2016 | +72.1% | +12.0% |

## Risk and diversification

How PWR has fallen, how it held up in crashes beside the S&P 500 and its popular alternatives, and what moves independently of it.

### What were PWR's worst declines?

A drawdown is the decline from a peak to the lowest point before a new high.

- In all five of PWR's worst declines, the S&P 500 held up better over the same dates.
- Not every decline was the market's doing: PWR fell 52.2% from June to August 1999, while the S&P 500 slipped only 0.2%.
- The slowest recovery came after PWR fell 97.1% from June 2000 to October 2002; it did not regain that peak until October 2020, 18 years later.

| Decline | Peak | Low | Back at the high | SPY over the same dates | Market event |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| −97.1% | June 16, 2000 | October 7, 2002 | October 15, 2020 | −44.4% | dot-com bust |
| −52.2% | June 30, 1999 | August 26, 1999 | March 1, 2000 | −0.2% |  |
| −33.9% | January 24, 2025 | March 10, 2025 | June 4, 2025 | −7.8% |  |
| −33.4% | April 2, 1998 | October 9, 1998 | November 9, 1998 | −11.5% |  |
| −28.5% | May 6, 2026 | July 29, 2026 | not yet | −0.3% |  |

### How did PWR do in stock market crashes?

This section measures how far PWR, the S&P 500 and each alternative fell from peak to trough during every major market crash since 2000.

- PWR fell further than the S&P 500 in eight of the ten crashes it has traded through. The clearest case was the dot-com bust, when PWR fell 97.1% and the S&P 500 fell 47.5%.
- Among its popular alternatives, DUK held up best, falling less than PWR in nine of the ten crashes they both traded through.

| Crash | Dates | PWR fall | SPY fall |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Dot-com bust | March 10, 2000 to October 9, 2002 | −97.1% | −47.5% |
| Global financial crisis | October 9, 2007 to March 9, 2009 | −69.6% | −55.2% |
| Flash crash | May 6, 2010 to May 7, 2010 | −1.7% | −1.5% |
| Euro debt crisis | July 22, 2011 to October 3, 2011 | −21.6% | −17.9% |
| China devaluation & oil rout | August 10, 2015 to February 11, 2016 | −35.4% | −12.8% |
| Volmageddon | February 2, 2018 to February 9, 2018 | −7.1% | −6.5% |
| Q4 2018 selloff | September 21, 2018 to December 24, 2018 | −22.1% | −19.3% |
| COVID crash | February 19, 2020 to March 23, 2020 | −40.8% | −33.7% |
| 2022 bear market | January 4, 2022 to October 12, 2022 | −21.7% | −24.5% |
| SVB / regional bank stress | March 8, 2023 to March 13, 2023 | −4.0% | −3.4% |

### How closely does PWR move with the S&P 500?

Upside capture measures how much of the S&P 500's gains an investment kept in the months the market rose, and downside capture how much of its losses it took in the months the market fell.

- Over the past 10 years, PWR captured 141% of the S&P 500's gains in rising months and 61% of its losses in falling months, with a beta of 1.22. Its share of the market's gains was larger than its share of the losses.
- Only FIX and STRL had a higher capture ratio (upside capture divided by downside capture) than PWR's 2.31, out of 19 popular alternatives with the same record.

Measured over the past 10 years of monthly returns against SPY.

| Investment | Upside capture | Downside capture | Beta |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| PWR: Quanta Services, Inc. (this page) | 141% | 61.0% | 1.22 |
| [FIX](https://easycompare.io/research/fix): Comfort Systems USA, Inc. | 180% | 71.0% | 1.38 |
| STRL: Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. | 186% | 79.0% | 1.60 |
| IESC: IES Holdings, Inc. | 173% | 93.0% | 1.53 |
| TPC: Tutor Perini Corporation | 155% | 206% | 1.74 |
| EME: EMCOR Group, Inc. | 128% | 75.0% | 1.16 |
| TTEK: Tetra Tech, Inc. | 94.0% | 76.0% | 0.88 |
| J: Jacobs Solutions Inc. | 82.0% | 78.0% | 0.79 |
| KBR: KBR, Inc. | 87.0% | 104% | 0.88 |
| HUBB: Hubbell Incorporated | 108% | 101% | 1.03 |
| STN: Stantec Inc. | 85.0% | 88.0% | 0.95 |
| [DUK](https://easycompare.io/research/duk): Duke Energy Corporation | 35.0% | 19.0% | 0.33 |
| MYRG: MYR Group Inc. | 117% | 75.0% | 1.22 |
| [ETN](https://easycompare.io/research/etn): Eaton Corporation plc | 114% | 80.0% | 1.16 |
| PRIM: Primoris Services Corporation | 118% | 136% | 1.33 |
| GVA: Granite Construction Incorporated | 98.0% | 126% | 1.41 |
| ACM: Aecom | 82.0% | 111% | 1.24 |
| MTZ: MasTec, Inc. | 143% | 143% | 1.57 |
| DY: Dycom Industries, Inc. | 114% | 141% | 1.53 |
| FLR: Fluor Corporation | 101% | 194% | 2.03 |

### What diversifies PWR?

Correlation measures how closely two investments move together, on a scale from 1 (in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to -1 (in opposite directions).

- Moving a fifth of the money in PWR into MCK would have cut the portfolio's volatility by 16% over the past 5 years while keeping its annual return (+41.6% for PWR alone, +41.7% for the mix).
- Among large ETFs, LVHI, DXJ and EMLP have moved largely independently of PWR over the past 5 years, with correlations of 0.49 or lower, and each still earned a positive 5-year return.
- Among large stocks, CAH, CLS and MCK have moved largely independently of PWR over the past 5 years, with correlations of 0.47 or lower, and each still earned a positive 5-year return.

| Investment | Correlation with PWR | 5Y return | Volatility | Sharpe | Rose in PWR's 7 down years |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| LVHI: Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 0.28 | +119% | 11.1% | 1.48 | 0 of 7 |
| DXJ: WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund | 0.33 | +225% | 19.1% | 1.34 | 2 of 7 |
| EMLP: First Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund | 0.49 | +101% | 14.5% | 1.04 | 1 of 7 |
| HDV: iShares Core High Dividend ETF | 0.28 | +83.3% | 13.0% | 1.00 | 1 of 7 |
| FTLS: First Trust Long/Short Equity ETF | 0.47 | +62.9% | 10.4% | 0.99 | 1 of 7 |
| DBEF: Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF | 0.44 | +85.0% | 13.8% | 0.96 | 2 of 7 |
| [GLD](https://easycompare.io/research/gld): SPDR Gold Shares | 0.09 | +126% | 18.9% | 0.96 | 2 of 7 |
| [XLE](https://easycompare.io/research/xle): State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | 0.11 | +177% | 25.5% | 0.93 | 1 of 7 |

## Common questions

### What was PWR's worst drawdown?

PWR's deepest decline since it began trading in 1998 was 97.1%, from June 2000 to October 2002. It took about 18 years from the low to climb back to its old high.

### What were PWR's best and worst years?

Over 27 full calendar years, PWR's best year was 2003, when it returned 109%. Its worst was 2002, with a return of -77.3%.

### Is there a better investment than PWR?

Among PWR's popular alternatives, EME earned more than PWR with less volatility over the past 5 years: 43.0% a year at 35.3% volatility, against 39.3% a year at 37.2%. Few investments have done better on both counts: only six of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than PWR with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them LLY, MPC and HWM.

### Is PWR more volatile than the S&P 500?

Yes. PWR's volatility over the past 5 years was 37.2%, 2.2 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, PWR's return lands within 37.2% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump.

### What is PWR's Sharpe ratio?

PWR's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 1.08, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so PWR earned more for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings.

### How correlated is PWR with the S&P 500?

Over the past 5 years, PWR's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.58 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They often move together: some diversification next to an index fund, but not a cushion. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against PWR instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a PWR holding.

### What are the best alternatives to PWR?

None of the 22 popular alternatives we compared outperformed PWR in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes, which says more about PWR's strength than about its alternatives.

### Did PWR outperform the S&P 500?

PWR finished ahead of the S&P 500 (SPY) in 17 of 27 full calendar years. In 2025, it returned +33.7%, against +17.7% for the index.

### How did PWR do in stock market crashes?

PWR fell less than the S&P 500 (SPY) in one of the ten major crashes it has traded through, and further in eight. The clearest case was the dot-com bust, when PWR fell 97.1% and the S&P 500 fell 47.5%.

### What diversifies PWR?

These had a low correlation with PWR over the past 5 years and still earned a positive 5-year return: among large ETFs, LVHI (correlation 0.28), DXJ (correlation 0.33) and EMLP (correlation 0.49); among large stocks, CAH (correlation 0.18), CLS (correlation 0.47) and MCK (correlation 0.17). A correlation near zero means the two have moved largely independently.

## More research

- [Comfort Systems USA (FIX) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/fix)
- [Vertiv (VRT) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/vrt)
- [Duke Energy (DUK) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/duk)
- [GE Vernova (GEV) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/gev)
- [Eaton (ETN) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/etn)
- [Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/schd)
- [NVIDIA (NVDA) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/nvda)
- [Apple (AAPL) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/aapl)
- [Alphabet (GOOG) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/goog)
- [Microsoft (MSFT) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/msft)
- [Amazon.com (AMZN) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/amzn)
- [Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/vti)

## Explore further

- Full page with charts: https://easycompare.io/research/pwr
- All research pages: https://easycompare.io/llms.txt
- Compare the entire market against PWR live: https://betterthanspy.com/?b=PWR&utm_source=easycompare&utm_medium=research