# How Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group (MUFG) compares with the whole market and its popular alternatives

> Source: EasyCompare research, https://easycompare.io/research/mufg
> Data as of October 20, 2026. Total returns include reinvested dividends. Past performance does not predict future results; nothing here is investment advice.

Built by QuantCommons' quantitative engine, this page is about relative opportunity, not data on MUFG alone. It places MUFG (Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc.) against 20+ popular alternatives, its neighboring categories and the entire market of over 10,000 U.S.-listed stocks and ETFs, and surfaces what has done better on consistent outperformance, return for the risk taken, behavior in real market crashes and diversification. The result is a clearer view of where MUFG stands in the market, and of the alternatives worth a closer look.

Period covered: MUFG's full trading record, from September 1989 through September 2026. All returns include reinvested dividends. Data as of October 20, 2026.

## Key findings

- **Right now:** MUFG has outpaced the market, rising 19.6% over the past 6 months against 9.1% for the S&P 500 and 11.2% for the Nasdaq 100. Not every peer went the same way. Over the past 6 months, BNS (Bank of Nova Scotia) rose 22.4% and BAC (Bank of America) fell 5.2%.
- **Stock or market?:** MUFG held up far better than its industry: it rose 1.8% over the past 3 months while the banks ETF KBE (State Street SPDR S&P Bank ETF) fell 6.8%. The S&P 500 rose 3.9%. Its bank peers did not move as one over the past 3 months: BNS (Bank of Nova Scotia) rose 6.9%, while BAC (Bank of America) fell 15.8%.
- **Past 1 to 3 years:** Over the past year, MUFG rose 41.3% against 15.8% for the S&P 500 and 17.9% for the Nasdaq 100. The same gap shows up over 3 years (184% against 89.3%). That said, MUFG led its bank peers in 2023, then fell behind HSBC and TD (Toronto-Dominion Bank) in 2025.
- **Long term:** MUFG turned $10,000 into $58,300 over the past decade, against $42,100 in the S&P 500. MUFG's 10-year return of 483% puts it ahead of 85% of the stocks worth at least $300 million with that much history. The S&P 500 returned 321%.
- **In a crash:** Across seven sell-offs, MUFG has typically fallen 1.6 times as far as the S&P 500.
- **Diversification:** MUFG is a real diversifier: a correlation of 0.28 with the S&P 500 over 5 years and 0.29 with the total US market, less closely than 74% of stocks worth at least $300 million. Over 10 years, MUFG's beta versus the S&P 500 was 0.66: 84% of the S&P 500's gains in rising months and 42% of its losses in falling ones.
- **Better options:** Few investments have done better on both counts: only two of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than MUFG with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them MCK (McKesson) and CAH (Cardinal Health).

## How much would $10,000 in MUFG have grown?

This chart tracks a hypothetical $10,000 investment in MUFG over the past 29 years, with dividends reinvested, alongside the same amount in the S&P 500, investments that ended ahead of MUFG over the same span and MUFG's popular alternatives, among those that traded for the entire period.

- $10,000 invested in MUFG at the end of September 1997 would have grown to $22,774 by September 2026, less than the $132,907 it would have become in SPY, an S&P 500 fund.
- Six of the eight other investments on the chart ended ahead of MUFG, and JPM finished highest, at $189,407.

## MUFG at a glance

This section summarizes the key facts about the stock, its returns over periods from one to ten years and the risk it has carried, with dividends reinvested throughout.

- MUFG's deepest decline since it began trading in 1989 was 88.3%, from October 1993 to April 2003. It took about 22 years from the low to climb back to its old high.
- Over 29 full calendar years, MUFG's best was 2003, when it returned 47.6%, and its worst was 2001, when it lost 33.1%. It lost money in 13 of those years.
- MUFG is 9.7% below its all-time high.

- Type: Stock, Financials (Banks - Diversified)
- Trading since: September 19, 1989
- Market value: $244B
- Volatility (5 years): 29.4%; Sharpe ratio: 1.13
- Worst decline ever: −88.3%, from October 25, 1993 to April 25, 2003; back at its high by August 12, 2025

| Period | MUFG total return |
| --- | --- |
| 1 month | −6.9% |
| 3 months | +1.8% |
| 6 months | +19.6% |
| year to date | +36.5% |
| 1 year | +41.3% |
| 3 years | +184% |
| 5 years | +319% |
| 10 years | +483% |

## MUFG against the whole market

Where MUFG ranks among every stock and fund, and what across the market has done better.

### How does MUFG rank among all stocks?

This section ranks MUFG on return, volatility, risk-adjusted return and worst decline against every stock worth at least $300 million with enough history.

- On return for the risk taken (the Sharpe ratio), MUFG ranks in the top 1% of the 2,893 stocks worth at least $300 million.

| Measure | MUFG | Rank |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1-year return | +41.3% | 703 of 3,287 (top 22%) |
| 3-year return | +184% | 455 of 3,017 (top 16%) |
| 5-year return | +319% | 147 of 2,893 (top 6%) |
| 10-year return | +483% | 322 of 2,202 (top 15%) |
| Volatility, 5 years | 29.4% | 671 of 2,893 (top 24%) |
| Sharpe ratio, 5 years | 1.13 | 43 of 2,893 (top 2%) |
| Worst decline, past 10 years | −54.9% | 660 of 2,187 (top 31%) |

### What has beaten MUFG on both return and risk?

Each dot is an investment, placed by how much it earned a year over the past 5 years (higher is better) and how much its price swung, its volatility (further left is calmer).

- Two stocks worth at least $500 million sit in the green region: each earned more than MUFG over the past 5 years with smaller price swings. That is fewer than 1% of the 3,633 screened. Few investments beat it on both counts.
- Among those with at least half MUFG's swings, CAH has the best return for its risk: 42.1% a year at 24.7% volatility, 16% less than MUFG's 29.4%, and a Sharpe ratio (return above cash per unit of volatility) of 1.55 against 1.13 for MUFG.

### Is there a better investment than MUFG?

The table below lists investments that beat MUFG over the past 5 years on at least one of these measures: a higher annual return with lower volatility, a higher annual return at similar volatility, a similar return with lower volatility, a higher Sharpe ratio with a smaller worst decline, a higher total return in most periods from 3 months to 10 years, or smaller losses in recent market crashes.

- Few investments have done better on both counts: only two of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than MUFG with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them MCK and CAH.

The 2 strongest of 2 investments that beat MUFG over the past 5 years, out of 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million.

| Investment | Group | Annual return (5 years) | Volatility | Sharpe | Worst decline (10 years) | 10Y return | Correlation with MUFG | Better on |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| MUFG: Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc. (this page) |  | +33.2% | 29.4% | 1.13 | −54.9% | +483% |  |  |
| [CAH](https://easycompare.io/research/cah): Cardinal Health, Inc. | Health Care Distribution | +42.1% | 24.7% | 1.55 | −46.1% | +349% | 0.09 | Higher return, lower volatility; Higher Sharpe, smaller worst decline; Higher return in most periods |
| [MCK](https://easycompare.io/research/mck): McKesson Corporation | Health Care Distribution | +38.7% | 25.0% | 1.44 | −38.1% | +586% | 0.28 | Higher return, lower volatility; Higher Sharpe, smaller worst decline; Higher return in most periods |

## MUFG against its popular alternatives

The investments people most often weigh against MUFG, compared period by period and year by year.

### How do MUFG's risk and return compare with its alternatives?

This map plots each investment's annual return over the past 5 years against its volatility, the size of its typical price swings.

- Only SMFG was both more rewarding and calmer than MUFG over the past 5 years, earning a higher annual return with lower volatility.
- Over the past 5 years, MUFG returned 33.2% a year, more than the S&P 500's 12.7%, with higher volatility (29.4% against 17.1%).

### Has MUFG consistently beaten its popular alternatives?

This section compares MUFG with the investments people most often weigh against it, checking each one over eight periods from one month to ten years.

- None of the 21 popular alternatives outperformed MUFG in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes. The closest was BBVA.
- SMFG earned more for the risk it took than MUFG (a higher Sharpe ratio) and fell less in its worst decline of the past 10 years.
- BBVA outperformed MUFG over all three long-term periods but in only one of the five short-term ones, so MUFG has had the better of it lately.

| Investment | 1Y return | 3Y return | 5Y return | 10Y return | Periods ahead of MUFG | Verdict | Sharpe |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| MUFG: Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc. (this page) | +41.3% | +184% | +319% | +483% |  |  | 1.13 |
| [BBVA](https://easycompare.io/research/bbva): Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, S.A. | +35.2% | +281% | +413% | +542% | 1/5 short-term, 3/3 long-term |  | 1.16 |
| [CM](https://easycompare.io/research/cm): Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce | +44.4% | +261% | +141% | +395% | 2/5 short-term, 1/3 long-term |  | 0.93 |
| [JPM](https://easycompare.io/research/jpm): JPMorgan Chase & Co. | +13.0% | +150% | +122% | +537% | 1/5 short-term, 1/3 long-term |  | 0.78 |
| [MFG](https://easycompare.io/research/mfg): Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. | +53.1% | +216% | +326% | +345% | 1/5 short-term, 1/3 long-term |  | 1.10 |
| [ING](https://easycompare.io/research/ing): ING Groep N.V. | +42.5% | +209% | +201% | +339% | 1/5 short-term, 1/3 long-term |  | 0.87 |
| [HSBC](https://easycompare.io/research/hsbc): HSBC Holdings plc | +47.7% | +201% | +318% | +319% | 1/5 short-term, 1/3 long-term |  | 1.24 |
| [MS](https://easycompare.io/research/ms): Morgan Stanley | +13.9% | +170% | +110% | +627% | 0/5 short-term, 1/3 long-term |  | 0.66 |
| [SAN](https://easycompare.io/research/san): Banco Santander, S.A. | +35.9% | +305% | +295% | +332% | 0/5 short-term, 1/3 long-term |  | 0.99 |
| [BCS](https://easycompare.io/research/bcs): Barclays PLC | +15.1% | +242% | +134% | +238% | 0/5 short-term, 1/3 long-term |  | 0.67 |
| [C](https://easycompare.io/research/c): Citigroup Inc. | +26.0% | +238% | +102% | +234% | 0/5 short-term, 1/3 long-term |  | 0.63 |
| [DB](https://easycompare.io/research/db): Deutsche Bank AG | −3.1% | +244% | +171% | +165% | 0/5 short-term, 1/3 long-term |  | 0.72 |
| [BNS](https://easycompare.io/research/bns): The Bank of Nova Scotia | +50.0% | +162% | +83.1% | +187% | 4/5 short-term, 0/3 long-term |  | 0.71 |
| [TD](https://easycompare.io/research/td): The Toronto-Dominion Bank | +57.5% | +141% | +109% | +310% | 2/5 short-term, 0/3 long-term |  | 0.84 |
| [IX](https://easycompare.io/research/ix): ORIX Corporation | +50.8% | +128% | +128% | +284% | 2/5 short-term, 0/3 long-term |  | 0.78 |
| EWJ: iShares MSCI Japan ETF | +19.2% | +79.1% | +55.6% | +132% | 2/5 short-term, 0/3 long-term |  | 0.57 |
| [SMFG](https://easycompare.io/research/smfg): Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc. | +53.5% | +181% | +327% | +474% | 1/5 short-term, 0/3 long-term |  | 1.14 |
| [RY](https://easycompare.io/research/ry): Royal Bank of Canada | +39.2% | +173% | +122% | +352% | 1/5 short-term, 0/3 long-term |  | 0.97 |
| [BMO](https://easycompare.io/research/bmo): Bank of Montreal | +37.6% | +146% | +89.4% | +295% | 1/5 short-term, 0/3 long-term |  | 0.71 |
| [UBS](https://easycompare.io/research/ubs): UBS Group AG | +26.3% | +116% | +210% | +374% | 0/5 short-term, 0/3 long-term |  | 0.90 |
| [BAC](https://easycompare.io/research/bac): Bank of America Corporation | −0.6% | +107% | +21.6% | +282% | 0/5 short-term, 0/3 long-term |  | 0.28 |
| NMR: Nomura Holdings, Inc. | +28.2% | +162% | +120% | +179% | 0/5 short-term, 0/3 long-term |  | 0.68 |

### How did MUFG do year by year?

This table shows each investment's total return in every full calendar year since 1997, along with where MUFG ranked among its popular alternatives each year.

- MUFG finished ahead of the S&P 500 in 12 of its 29 full calendar years, and ahead of it in each of the last four.
- Among its popular alternatives, TD came out ahead of MUFG most often, in 20 of the 29 years both traded.
- Ranked against its popular alternatives each year, MUFG finished in the top quarter in six of 29 years and in the bottom quarter in eight. In 2025, it ranked 17 of 22.

| Year | MUFG | SPY |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2025 | +40.0% | +17.7% |
| 2024 | +39.7% | +24.9% |
| 2023 | +32.7% | +26.2% |
| 2022 | +26.2% | −18.2% |
| 2021 | +27.9% | +28.7% |
| 2020 | −13.7% | +18.3% |
| 2019 | +15.8% | +31.2% |
| 2018 | −31.3% | −4.6% |
| 2017 | +20.7% | +21.7% |
| 2016 | +2.5% | +12.0% |

## Risk and diversification

How MUFG has fallen, how it held up in crashes beside the S&P 500 and its popular alternatives, and what moves independently of it.

### What were MUFG's worst declines?

A drawdown is the decline from a peak to the lowest point before a new high.

- In all three of MUFG's worst declines, the S&P 500 held up better over the same dates.
- Not every decline was the market's doing: MUFG fell 88.3% from October 1993 to April 2003, while the S&P 500 rose 127%.
- The slowest recovery came after MUFG fell 88.3% from October 1993 to April 2003; it did not regain that peak until August 2025, 22 years later.

| Decline | Peak | Low | Back at the high | SPY over the same dates | Market event |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| −88.3% | October 25, 1993 | April 25, 2003 | August 12, 2025 | +127% | dot-com bust |
| −51.1% | October 22, 1991 | April 8, 1992 | March 18, 1993 | — |  |
| −47.8% | January 2, 1990 | October 3, 1990 | October 4, 1991 | — |  |
| −17.3% | February 13, 2026 | March 30, 2026 | June 4, 2026 | −7.0% |  |
| −12.8% | June 14, 1993 | June 21, 1993 | July 13, 1993 | −0.3% |  |

### How did MUFG do in stock market crashes?

This section measures how far MUFG, the S&P 500 and each alternative fell from peak to trough during every major market crash since 2000.

- MUFG fell further than the S&P 500 in seven of the ten crashes it has traded through. The clearest case was the 2015 China and oil sell-off, when MUFG fell 45.1% and the S&P 500 fell 12.8%.
- Among its popular alternatives, EWJ held up best, falling less than MUFG in nine of the ten crashes they both traded through.

| Crash | Dates | MUFG fall | SPY fall |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Dot-com bust | March 10, 2000 to October 9, 2002 | −65.1% | −47.5% |
| Global financial crisis | October 9, 2007 to March 9, 2009 | −65.5% | −55.2% |
| Flash crash | May 6, 2010 to May 7, 2010 | −0.3% | −1.5% |
| Euro debt crisis | July 22, 2011 to October 3, 2011 | −20.7% | −17.9% |
| China devaluation & oil rout | August 10, 2015 to February 11, 2016 | −45.1% | −12.8% |
| Volmageddon | February 2, 2018 to February 9, 2018 | −6.7% | −6.5% |
| Q4 2018 selloff | September 21, 2018 to December 24, 2018 | −27.0% | −19.3% |
| COVID crash | February 19, 2020 to March 23, 2020 | −33.0% | −33.7% |
| 2022 bear market | January 4, 2022 to October 12, 2022 | −33.4% | −24.5% |
| SVB / regional bank stress | March 8, 2023 to March 13, 2023 | −9.5% | −3.4% |

### How closely does MUFG move with the S&P 500?

Upside capture measures how much of the S&P 500's gains an investment kept in the months the market rose, and downside capture how much of its losses it took in the months the market fell.

- None of the 21 popular alternatives with the same record had a higher capture ratio (upside capture divided by downside capture) than MUFG's 2.01.
- Over the past 10 years, MUFG captured 84% of the S&P 500's gains in rising months and 42% of its losses in falling months, with a beta of 0.66. That is a defensive profile: it gave up some of the market's upside in exchange for smaller losses.

Measured over the past 10 years of monthly returns against SPY.

| Investment | Upside capture | Downside capture | Beta |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| MUFG: Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc. (this page) | 84.0% | 42.0% | 0.66 |
| [BBVA](https://easycompare.io/research/bbva): Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, S.A. | 121% | 97.0% | 1.11 |
| [CM](https://easycompare.io/research/cm): Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce | 108% | 106% | 1.07 |
| [JPM](https://easycompare.io/research/jpm): JPMorgan Chase & Co. | 117% | 103% | 1.09 |
| [MFG](https://easycompare.io/research/mfg): Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. | 75.0% | 42.0% | 0.54 |
| [ING](https://easycompare.io/research/ing): ING Groep N.V. | 136% | 155% | 1.36 |
| [HSBC](https://easycompare.io/research/hsbc): HSBC Holdings plc | 79.0% | 53.0% | 0.58 |
| [MS](https://easycompare.io/research/ms): Morgan Stanley | 142% | 137% | 1.39 |
| [SAN](https://easycompare.io/research/san): Banco Santander, S.A. | 101% | 92.0% | 1.02 |
| [BCS](https://easycompare.io/research/bcs): Barclays PLC | 113% | 131% | 1.26 |
| [C](https://easycompare.io/research/c): Citigroup Inc. | 131% | 165% | 1.49 |
| [DB](https://easycompare.io/research/db): Deutsche Bank AG | 102% | 118% | 1.21 |
| [BNS](https://easycompare.io/research/bns): The Bank of Nova Scotia | 97.0% | 120% | 1.05 |
| [TD](https://easycompare.io/research/td): The Toronto-Dominion Bank | 89.0% | 80.0% | 0.88 |
| [IX](https://easycompare.io/research/ix): ORIX Corporation | 84.0% | 75.0% | 0.86 |
| EWJ: iShares MSCI Japan ETF | 65.0% | 71.0% | 0.67 |
| [SMFG](https://easycompare.io/research/smfg): Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc. | 84.0% | 43.0% | 0.65 |
| [RY](https://easycompare.io/research/ry): Royal Bank of Canada | 97.0% | 88.0% | 0.88 |
| [BMO](https://easycompare.io/research/bmo): Bank of Montreal | 104% | 112% | 1.12 |
| [UBS](https://easycompare.io/research/ubs): UBS Group AG | 116% | 120% | 1.18 |
| [BAC](https://easycompare.io/research/bac): Bank of America Corporation | 127% | 146% | 1.36 |
| NMR: Nomura Holdings, Inc. | 81.0% | 82.0% | 0.76 |

### What diversifies MUFG?

Correlation measures how closely two investments move together, on a scale from 1 (in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to -1 (in opposite directions).

- Moving a fifth of the money in MUFG into CAH would have cut the portfolio's volatility by 15% over the past 5 years and raised its annual return (+34.8% for MUFG alone, +36.6% for the mix).
- Among large ETFs, LVHI, DXJ and EMLP have moved largely independently of MUFG over the past 5 years, with correlations of 0.48 or lower, and each still earned a positive 5-year return.
- MCK made money in nine of the 13 calendar years in which MUFG lost money.

| Investment | Correlation with MUFG | 5Y return | Volatility | Sharpe | Rose in MUFG's 13 down years |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| LVHI: Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 0.48 | +119% | 11.1% | 1.48 | 0 of 13 |
| DXJ: WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund | 0.39 | +225% | 19.1% | 1.34 | 3 of 13 |
| EMLP: First Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund | 0.33 | +101% | 14.5% | 1.04 | 1 of 13 |
| HDV: iShares Core High Dividend ETF | 0.40 | +83.3% | 13.0% | 1.00 | 1 of 13 |
| [SMH](https://easycompare.io/research/smh): VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.20 | +323% | 36.9% | 0.97 | 5 of 13 |
| DBEF: Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF | 0.38 | +85.0% | 13.8% | 0.96 | 2 of 13 |
| [GLD](https://easycompare.io/research/gld): SPDR Gold Shares | 0.18 | +126% | 18.9% | 0.96 | 6 of 13 |
| SPMO: Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 0.19 | +136% | 20.8% | 0.93 | 1 of 13 |

## Common questions

### What was MUFG's worst drawdown?

MUFG's deepest decline since it began trading in 1989 was 88.3%, from October 1993 to April 2003. It took about 22 years from the low to climb back to its old high.

### What were MUFG's best and worst years?

Over 29 full calendar years, MUFG's best year was 2003, when it returned 47.6%. Its worst was 2001, with a return of -33.1%.

### Is there a better investment than MUFG?

Few investments have done better on both counts: only two of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than MUFG with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them MCK and CAH.

### Is MUFG more volatile than the S&P 500?

Yes. MUFG's volatility over the past 5 years was 29.4%, 1.7 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, MUFG's return lands within 29.4% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump.

### What is MUFG's Sharpe ratio?

MUFG's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 1.13, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so MUFG earned more for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings.

### How correlated is MUFG with the S&P 500?

Over the past 5 years, MUFG's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.28 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They are only loosely linked, which makes it a real diversifier next to an index fund. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against MUFG instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a MUFG holding.

### What are the best alternatives to MUFG?

None of the 21 popular alternatives we compared outperformed MUFG in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes, which says more about MUFG's strength than about its alternatives.

### Did MUFG outperform the S&P 500?

MUFG finished ahead of the S&P 500 (SPY) in 12 of 29 full calendar years. In 2025, it returned +40.0%, against +17.7% for the index.

### How did MUFG do in stock market crashes?

MUFG fell less than the S&P 500 (SPY) in two of the ten major crashes it has traded through, and further in seven. The clearest case was the 2015 China and oil sell-off, when MUFG fell 45.1% and the S&P 500 fell 12.8%.

### What diversifies MUFG?

These had a low correlation with MUFG over the past 5 years and still earned a positive 5-year return: among large ETFs, LVHI (correlation 0.48), DXJ (correlation 0.39) and EMLP (correlation 0.33); among large stocks, CAH (correlation 0.09), CLS (correlation 0.24) and FIX (correlation 0.07). A correlation near zero means the two have moved largely independently.

## More research

- [Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria (BBVA) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/bbva)
- [Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce (CM) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/cm)
- [JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/jpm)
- [Mizuho Financial Group (MFG) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/mfg)
- [ING Groep (ING) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/ing)
- [HSBC Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/hsbc)
- [Morgan Stanley (MS) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/ms)
- [Banco Santander (SAN) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/san)
- [Barclays (BCS) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/bcs)
- [Citigroup (C) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/c)
- [Deutsche Bank (DB) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/db)
- [Bank of Nova Scotia (BNS) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/bns)

## Explore further

- Full page with charts: https://easycompare.io/research/mufg
- All research pages: https://easycompare.io/llms.txt
- Compare the entire market against MUFG live: https://betterthanspy.com/?b=MUFG&utm_source=easycompare&utm_medium=research