# How Micron Technology (MU) compares with the whole market and its popular alternatives

> Source: EasyCompare research, https://easycompare.io/research/mu
> Data as of October 20, 2026. Total returns include reinvested dividends. Past performance does not predict future results; nothing here is investment advice.

Built by QuantCommons' quantitative engine, this page is about relative opportunity, not data on MU alone. It places MU (Micron Technology, Inc.) against 20+ popular alternatives, its neighboring categories and the entire market of over 10,000 U.S.-listed stocks and ETFs, and surfaces what has done better on consistent outperformance, return for the risk taken, behavior in real market crashes and diversification. The result is a clearer view of where MU stands in the market, and of the alternatives worth a closer look.

Period covered: MU's full trading record, from October 1986 through September 2026. All returns include reinvested dividends. Data as of October 20, 2026.

## Key findings

- **Right now:** Over the past 6 months, MU rose 99.9% against 9.1% for the S&P 500 and 11.2% for the Nasdaq 100. That said, MU is 26.1% below its high, bear-market territory, while the S&P 500 sits 1.3% below a record.
- **Stock or market?:** MU rose 3.6% over the past 3 months, 5.8 points ahead of the semiconductors ETF SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF), which fell 2.2%. The S&P 500 rose 3.9%. Its semiconductor peers did not move as one over the past 3 months: NVDA (NVIDIA) rose 6.6%, while AVGO (Broadcom) fell 11.4%.
- **Past 1 to 3 years:** MU has run far ahead of the market, rising 334% over the past year against 15.8% for the S&P 500 and 17.9% for the Nasdaq 100. The same gap shows up over 3 years (1,246% against 89.3%).
- **Long term:** MU turned $10,000 into $534,000 over the past decade, against $42,100 in the S&P 500. MU's 10-year return of 5,243% puts it among the best of the stocks worth at least $300 million with that much history. The S&P 500 returned 321%.
- **In a crash:** Across seven sell-offs, MU has typically fallen 2.1 times as far as the S&P 500.
- **Diversification:** Against the S&P 500, MU has a correlation of 0.51 over 5 years, more closely than 75% of stocks worth at least $300 million. Next to an index fund it is some diversification, but not a hedge. Over 10 years, MU's beta versus the S&P 500 was 1.75: in the S&P 500's rising months it gained about twice as much as the index, and in falling months it lost 1.1 times as much.
- **Better options:** Few investments have done better on both counts: only two of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than MU with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them FIX (Comfort Systems USA) and BELFB (Bel Fuse). Across the whole market, MU outpaced 99% of stocks worth at least $300 million over the past decade.

## How much would $10,000 in MU have grown?

This chart tracks a hypothetical $10,000 investment in MU over the past 29 years, with dividends reinvested, alongside the same amount in the S&P 500, investments that ended ahead of MU over the same span and MU's popular alternatives, among those that traded for the entire period.

- $10,000 invested in MU at the end of September 1997 would have grown to $629,766 by September 2026, more than the $132,907 it would have become in SPY, an S&P 500 fund.
- Five of the eight other investments on the chart ended ahead of MU, and STRL finished highest, at $7,886,408.

## MU at a glance

This section summarizes the key facts about the stock, its returns over periods from one to ten years and the risk it has carried, with dividends reinvested throughout.

- MU is still 26.1% below its all-time high.
- MU's deepest decline since it began trading in 1986 was 98.2%, from July 2000 to November 2008. It took about 13 years from the low to climb back to its old high.
- Over 29 full calendar years, MU's best was 2009, when it returned 301%, and its worst was 2002, when it lost 68.6%. It lost money in 13 of those years.

- Type: Stock, Technology (Semiconductors)
- Trading since: October 17, 1986
- Market value: $1.0T
- Volatility (5 years): 57.1%; Sharpe ratio: 1.20
- Worst decline ever: −98.3%, from July 14, 2000 to November 20, 2008; back at its high by January 4, 2022

| Period | MU total return |
| --- | --- |
| 1 month | −14.2% |
| 3 months | +3.6% |
| 6 months | +99.9% |
| year to date | +184% |
| 1 year | +334% |
| 3 years | +1,246% |
| 5 years | +1,244% |
| 10 years | +5,243% |

## MU against the whole market

Where MU ranks among every stock and fund, and what across the market has done better.

### How does MU rank among all stocks?

This section ranks MU on return, volatility, risk-adjusted return and worst decline against every stock worth at least $300 million with enough history.

- MU's 5-year return ranks in the top 1% of the 2,893 stocks worth at least $300 million with 5 years of history.
- MU is among the more volatile stocks: its price swings rank in the bottom 24% of the 2,893 stocks worth at least $300 million, where the top is the calmest.

| Measure | MU | Rank |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1-year return | +334% | 13 of 3,287 (top 1%) |
| 3-year return | +1,246% | 12 of 3,017 (top 1%) |
| 5-year return | +1,244% | 7 of 2,893 (top 1%) |
| 10-year return | +5,243% | 6 of 2,202 (top 1%) |
| Volatility, 5 years | 57.1% | 2,192 of 2,893 (top 76%) |
| Sharpe ratio, 5 years | 1.20 | 22 of 2,893 (top 1%) |
| Worst decline, past 10 years | −57.6% | 790 of 2,187 (top 37%) |

### What has beaten MU on both return and risk?

Each dot is an investment, placed by how much it earned a year over the past 5 years (higher is better) and how much its price swung, its volatility (further left is calmer).

- Two stocks worth at least $500 million sit in the green region: each earned more than MU over the past 5 years with smaller price swings. That is fewer than 1% of the 3,633 screened. Few investments beat it on both counts.
- Among those with at least half MU's swings, FIX has the best return for its risk: 77.0% a year at 46.7% volatility, 18% less than MU's 57.1%, and a Sharpe ratio (return above cash per unit of volatility) of 1.46 against 1.20 for MU. BELFB earned the most, 78.0% a year, while still swinging less than MU (52.1% against 57.1%).

### Is there a better investment than MU?

The table below lists investments that beat MU over the past 5 years on at least one of these measures: a higher annual return with lower volatility, a higher annual return at similar volatility, a similar return with lower volatility, a higher Sharpe ratio with a smaller worst decline, a higher total return in most periods from 3 months to 10 years, or smaller losses in recent market crashes.

- Few investments have done better on both counts: only two of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than MU with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them FIX and BELFB.

The 2 strongest of 2 investments that beat MU over the past 5 years, out of 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million.

| Investment | Group | Annual return (5 years) | Volatility | Sharpe | Worst decline (10 years) | 10Y return | Correlation with MU | Better on |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| MU: Micron Technology, Inc. (this page) |  | +68.1% | 57.1% | 1.20 | −57.6% | +5,243% |  |  |
| [FIX](https://easycompare.io/research/fix): Comfort Systems USA, Inc. | Engineering & Construction | +77.0% | 46.7% | 1.46 | −49.7% | +5,305% | 0.27 | Higher return, lower volatility; Higher Sharpe, smaller worst decline; Smaller losses in recent crashes |
| BELFB: Bel Fuse Inc. | Hardware, Equipment & Parts | +78.0% | 52.1% | 1.37 | −79.8% | +872% | 0.33 | Higher return, lower volatility |

## MU against its popular alternatives

The investments people most often weigh against MU, compared period by period and year by year.

### How do MU's risk and return compare with its alternatives?

This map plots each investment's annual return over the past 5 years against its volatility, the size of its typical price swings.

- None of the 20 popular alternatives earned more than MU over the past 5 years with smaller price swings, so every higher return on the map came with a bumpier ride.
- Over the past 5 years, MU returned 68.2% a year, more than the S&P 500's 12.7%, with higher volatility (57.1% against 17.1%).

### Has MU consistently beaten its popular alternatives?

This section compares MU with the investments people most often weigh against it, checking each one over eight periods from one month to ten years.

- None of the 21 popular alternatives outperformed MU in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes. The closest was NVDA.

| Investment | 1Y return | 3Y return | 5Y return | 10Y return | Periods ahead of MU | Verdict | Sharpe |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| MU: Micron Technology, Inc. (this page) | +334% | +1,246% | +1,244% | +5,243% |  |  | 1.20 |
| [NVDA](https://easycompare.io/research/nvda): NVIDIA Corporation | +18.8% | +425% | +884% | +13,019% | 2/5 short-term, 1/3 long-term |  | 1.14 |
| [AMD](https://easycompare.io/research/amd): Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. | +122% | +425% | +359% | +7,583% | 2/5 short-term, 1/3 long-term |  | 0.82 |
| [DELL](https://easycompare.io/research/dell): Dell Technologies Inc. | +217% | +636% | +800% | +3,701% | 3/5 short-term, 0/3 long-term |  | 1.08 |
| [MRVL](https://easycompare.io/research/mrvl): Marvell Technology, Inc. | +181% | +390% | +264% | +1,874% | 2/5 short-term, 0/3 long-term |  | 0.72 |
| [TSM](https://easycompare.io/research/tsm): Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited | +44.3% | +382% | +293% | +1,505% | 2/5 short-term, 0/3 long-term |  | 0.91 |
| [MSFT](https://easycompare.io/research/msft): Microsoft Corporation | +3.8% | +66.6% | +80.3% | +946% | 2/5 short-term, 0/3 long-term |  | 0.56 |
| [ADI](https://easycompare.io/research/adi): Analog Devices, Inc. | +63.3% | +150% | +144% | +652% | 2/5 short-term, 0/3 long-term |  | 0.69 |
| [LRCX](https://easycompare.io/research/lrcx): Lam Research Corporation | +83.7% | +350% | +390% | +2,989% | 1/5 short-term, 0/3 long-term |  | 0.89 |
| [KLAC](https://easycompare.io/research/klac): KLA Corporation | +41.0% | +258% | +413% | +2,534% | 1/5 short-term, 0/3 long-term |  | 0.94 |
| [AVGO](https://easycompare.io/research/avgo): Broadcom Inc. | −3.5% | +305% | +617% | +2,380% | 1/5 short-term, 0/3 long-term |  | 1.11 |
| [AMAT](https://easycompare.io/research/amat): Applied Materials, Inc. | +78.5% | +209% | +215% | +1,488% | 1/5 short-term, 0/3 long-term |  | 0.72 |
| RMBS: Rambus Inc. | −5.5% | +68.7% | +313% | +691% | 1/5 short-term, 0/3 long-term |  | 0.78 |
| [TXN](https://easycompare.io/research/txn): Texas Instruments Incorporated | +58.7% | +105% | +60.5% | +424% | 1/5 short-term, 0/3 long-term |  | 0.45 |
| [QCOM](https://easycompare.io/research/qcom): QUALCOMM Incorporated | +7.4% | +72.4% | +48.3% | +239% | 1/5 short-term, 0/3 long-term |  | 0.40 |
| [NXPI](https://easycompare.io/research/nxpi): NXP Semiconductors N.V. | +10.0% | +34.9% | +31.9% | +159% | 1/5 short-term, 0/3 long-term |  | 0.34 |
| GFS: GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. | +32.7% | −13.2% | — | — | 1/5 short-term, 0/3 long-term |  | — |
| [STX](https://easycompare.io/research/stx): Seagate Technology Holdings plc | +217% | +975% | +866% | +2,698% | 0/5 short-term, 0/3 long-term |  | 1.18 |
| [UMC](https://easycompare.io/research/umc): United Microelectronics Corporation | +166% | +202% | +147% | +1,610% | 0/5 short-term, 0/3 long-term |  | 0.63 |
| [WDC](https://easycompare.io/research/wdc): Western Digital Corporation | +200% | +1,030% | +759% | +911% | 0/5 short-term, 0/3 long-term |  | 1.07 |
| SIMO: Silicon Motion Technology Corporation | +125% | +320% | +243% | +494% | 0/5 short-term, 0/3 long-term |  | 0.71 |
| [INTC](https://easycompare.io/research/intc): Intel Corp. | +141% | +167% | +79.8% | +219% | 0/5 short-term, 0/3 long-term |  | 0.49 |

### How did MU do year by year?

This table shows each investment's total return in every full calendar year since 1997, along with where MU ranked among its popular alternatives each year.

- MU finished ahead of the S&P 500 in 14 of its 29 full calendar years.
- Among its popular alternatives, AVGO came out ahead of MU most often, in 11 of the 16 years both traded.
- Ranked against its popular alternatives each year, MU finished in the top quarter in seven of 29 years and in the bottom quarter in five. In 2025, it ranked 2 of 22.

| Year | MU | SPY |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2025 | +240% | +17.7% |
| 2024 | −1.0% | +24.9% |
| 2023 | +71.9% | +26.2% |
| 2022 | −45.9% | −18.2% |
| 2021 | +24.2% | +28.7% |
| 2020 | +39.8% | +18.3% |
| 2019 | +69.5% | +31.2% |
| 2018 | −22.8% | −4.6% |
| 2017 | +87.6% | +21.7% |
| 2016 | +54.7% | +12.0% |

## Risk and diversification

How MU has fallen, how it held up in crashes beside the S&P 500 and its popular alternatives, and what moves independently of it.

### What were MU's worst declines?

A drawdown is the decline from a peak to the lowest point before a new high.

- In all three of MU's worst declines, the S&P 500 held up better over the same dates.
- Not every decline was the market's doing: MU fell 81.7% from September 1995 to July 1996, while the S&P 500 rose 10.9%.
- The slowest recovery came after MU fell 98.2% from July 2000 to November 2008; it did not regain that peak until January 2022, 13 years later.

| Decline | Peak | Low | Back at the high | SPY over the same dates | Market event |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| −98.3% | July 14, 2000 | November 20, 2008 | January 4, 2022 | −42.7% | dot-com bust |
| −81.7% | September 11, 1995 | July 23, 1996 | February 29, 2000 | +10.9% |  |
| −72.1% | June 12, 1989 | January 30, 1990 | March 2, 1993 | — |  |
| −63.3% | October 5, 1987 | October 26, 1987 | February 18, 1988 | — |  |
| −57.6% | June 18, 2024 | April 4, 2025 | September 12, 2025 | −6.7% |  |

### How did MU do in stock market crashes?

This section measures how far MU, the S&P 500 and each alternative fell from peak to trough during every major market crash since 2000.

- MU fell further than the S&P 500 in nine of the ten crashes it has traded through. The clearest case was the dot-com bust, when MU fell 87.8% and the S&P 500 fell 47.5%.
- Among its popular alternatives, ADI held up best, falling less than MU in all ten crashes they both traded through.

| Crash | Dates | MU fall | SPY fall |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Dot-com bust | March 10, 2000 to October 9, 2002 | −87.8% | −47.5% |
| Global financial crisis | October 9, 2007 to March 9, 2009 | −84.2% | −55.2% |
| Flash crash | May 6, 2010 to May 7, 2010 | −2.0% | −1.5% |
| Euro debt crisis | July 22, 2011 to October 3, 2011 | −46.5% | −17.9% |
| China devaluation & oil rout | August 10, 2015 to February 11, 2016 | −49.4% | −12.8% |
| Volmageddon | February 2, 2018 to February 9, 2018 | −8.8% | −6.5% |
| Q4 2018 selloff | September 21, 2018 to December 24, 2018 | −36.6% | −19.3% |
| COVID crash | February 19, 2020 to March 23, 2020 | −42.5% | −33.7% |
| 2022 bear market | January 4, 2022 to October 12, 2022 | −49.6% | −24.5% |
| SVB / regional bank stress | March 8, 2023 to March 13, 2023 | −5.3% | −3.4% |

### How closely does MU move with the S&P 500?

Upside capture measures how much of the S&P 500's gains an investment kept in the months the market rose, and downside capture how much of its losses it took in the months the market fell.

- Over the past 10 years, MU captured 204% of the S&P 500's gains in rising months and 114% of its losses in falling months, with a beta of 1.75. It amplified the market's moves in both directions.
- STX took just 88% of the S&P 500's losses, against 114% for MU, while still keeping 169% of its gains.
- Six of the 20 popular alternatives had a higher capture ratio (upside capture divided by downside capture) than MU's 1.79, led by DELL, KLAC and UMC.

Measured over the past 10 years of monthly returns against SPY.

| Investment | Upside capture | Downside capture | Beta |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| MU: Micron Technology, Inc. (this page) | 204% | 114% | 1.75 |
| [NVDA](https://easycompare.io/research/nvda): NVIDIA Corporation | 248% | 140% | 1.83 |
| [AMD](https://easycompare.io/research/amd): Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. | 254% | 179% | 2.25 |
| [DELL](https://easycompare.io/research/dell): Dell Technologies Inc. | 154% | 43.0% | 1.13 |
| [MRVL](https://easycompare.io/research/mrvl): Marvell Technology, Inc. | 167% | 116% | 1.68 |
| [TSM](https://easycompare.io/research/tsm): Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited | 138% | 75.0% | 1.15 |
| [MSFT](https://easycompare.io/research/msft): Microsoft Corporation | 127% | 91.0% | 0.96 |
| [ADI](https://easycompare.io/research/adi): Analog Devices, Inc. | 117% | 92.0% | 1.20 |
| [LRCX](https://easycompare.io/research/lrcx): Lam Research Corporation | 183% | 104% | 1.56 |
| [KLAC](https://easycompare.io/research/klac): KLA Corporation | 152% | 59.0% | 1.32 |
| [AVGO](https://easycompare.io/research/avgo): Broadcom Inc. | 158% | 86.0% | 1.19 |
| [AMAT](https://easycompare.io/research/amat): Applied Materials, Inc. | 152% | 97.0% | 1.51 |
| RMBS: Rambus Inc. | 124% | 97.0% | 1.45 |
| [TXN](https://easycompare.io/research/txn): Texas Instruments Incorporated | 113% | 108% | 1.18 |
| [QCOM](https://easycompare.io/research/qcom): QUALCOMM Incorporated | 115% | 139% | 1.51 |
| [NXPI](https://easycompare.io/research/nxpi): NXP Semiconductors N.V. | 115% | 157% | 1.63 |
| [STX](https://easycompare.io/research/stx): Seagate Technology Holdings plc | 169% | 88.0% | 1.58 |
| [UMC](https://easycompare.io/research/umc): United Microelectronics Corporation | 133% | 52.0% | 1.33 |
| [WDC](https://easycompare.io/research/wdc): Western Digital Corporation | 171% | 163% | 1.87 |
| SIMO: Silicon Motion Technology Corporation | 126% | 116% | 1.41 |
| [INTC](https://easycompare.io/research/intc): Intel Corp. | 98.0% | 100% | 1.43 |

### What diversifies MU?

Correlation measures how closely two investments move together, on a scale from 1 (in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to -1 (in opposite directions).

- Moving a fifth of the money in MU into MPC would have cut the portfolio's volatility by 19% over the past 5 years and raised its annual return (+72.7% for MU alone, +73.2% for the mix).
- Among large ETFs, LVHI, DXJ and PJUL have moved largely independently of MU over the past 5 years, with correlations of 0.39 or lower, and each still earned a positive 5-year return.
- MCK made money in eight of the 13 calendar years in which MU lost money.

| Investment | Correlation with MU | 5Y return | Volatility | Sharpe | Rose in MU's 13 down years |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| LVHI: Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 0.17 | +119% | 11.1% | 1.48 | 2 of 13 |
| DXJ: WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund | 0.36 | +225% | 19.1% | 1.34 | 3 of 13 |
| PJUL: Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF | 0.39 | +64.4% | 8.6% | 1.20 | 1 of 13 |
| EMLP: First Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund | 0.10 | +101% | 14.5% | 1.04 | 2 of 13 |
| HDV: iShares Core High Dividend ETF | 0.17 | +83.3% | 13.0% | 1.00 | 2 of 13 |
| FTLS: First Trust Long/Short Equity ETF | 0.41 | +62.9% | 10.4% | 0.99 | 2 of 13 |
| DBEF: Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF | 0.47 | +85.0% | 13.8% | 0.96 | 2 of 13 |
| [GLD](https://easycompare.io/research/gld): SPDR Gold Shares | 0.19 | +126% | 18.9% | 0.96 | 5 of 13 |

## Common questions

### What was MU's worst drawdown?

MU's deepest decline since it began trading in 1986 was 98.2%, from July 2000 to November 2008. It took about 13 years from the low to climb back to its old high.

### What were MU's best and worst years?

Over 29 full calendar years, MU's best year was 2009, when it returned 301%. Its worst was 2002, with a return of -68.6%.

### Is there a better investment than MU?

Few investments have done better on both counts: only two of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than MU with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them FIX and BELFB.

### Is MU more volatile than the S&P 500?

Yes. MU's volatility over the past 5 years was 57.1%, 3.3 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, MU's return lands within 57.1% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump.

### What is MU's Sharpe ratio?

MU's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 1.20, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so MU earned more for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings.

### How correlated is MU with the S&P 500?

Over the past 5 years, MU's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.51 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They often move together: some diversification next to an index fund, but not a cushion. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against MU instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a MU holding.

### What are the best alternatives to MU?

None of the 21 popular alternatives we compared outperformed MU in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes, which says more about MU's strength than about its alternatives.

### Did MU outperform the S&P 500?

MU finished ahead of the S&P 500 (SPY) in 14 of 29 full calendar years. In 2025, it returned +240%, against +17.7% for the index.

### How did MU do in stock market crashes?

MU fell less than the S&P 500 (SPY) in none of the ten major crashes it has traded through, and further in nine. The clearest case was the dot-com bust, when MU fell 87.8% and the S&P 500 fell 47.5%.

### What diversifies MU?

These had a low correlation with MU over the past 5 years and still earned a positive 5-year return: among large ETFs, LVHI (correlation 0.17), DXJ (correlation 0.36) and PJUL (correlation 0.39); among large stocks, CAH (correlation 0.14), CLS (correlation 0.29) and FIX (correlation 0.27). A correlation near zero means the two have moved largely independently.

## More research

- [NVIDIA (NVDA) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/nvda)
- [Advanced Micro Devices (AMD) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/amd)
- [Dell Technologies (DELL) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/dell)
- [Marvell Technology (MRVL) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/mrvl)
- [Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing (TSM) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/tsm)
- [Microsoft (MSFT) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/msft)
- [Analog Devices (ADI) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/adi)
- [Lam Research (LRCX) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/lrcx)
- [KLA (KLAC) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/klac)
- [Broadcom (AVGO) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/avgo)
- [Applied Materials (AMAT) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/amat)
- [Texas Instruments (TXN) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/txn)

## Explore further

- Full page with charts: https://easycompare.io/research/mu
- All research pages: https://easycompare.io/llms.txt
- Compare the entire market against MU live: https://betterthanspy.com/?b=MU&utm_source=easycompare&utm_medium=research