# How HSBC compares with the whole market and its popular alternatives

> Source: EasyCompare research, https://easycompare.io/research/hsbc
> Data as of October 20, 2026. Total returns include reinvested dividends. Past performance does not predict future results; nothing here is investment advice.

Built by QuantCommons' quantitative engine, this page is about relative opportunity, not data on HSBC alone. It places HSBC (HSBC Holdings plc) against 20+ popular alternatives, its neighboring categories and the entire market of over 10,000 U.S.-listed stocks and ETFs, and surfaces what has done better on consistent outperformance, return for the risk taken, behavior in real market crashes and diversification. The result is a clearer view of where HSBC stands in the market, and of the alternatives worth a closer look.

Period covered: HSBC's full trading record, from September 1995 through September 2026. All returns include reinvested dividends. Data as of October 20, 2026.

## Key findings

- **Right now:** Over the past 3 months, HSBC fell 5.9% while the S&P 500 rose 3.9%. Its bank peers were far apart over the past 3 months, from JPM (JPMorgan Chase & Co., down 0.6%) to BAC (Bank of America, down 15.8%).
- **Stock or market?:** HSBC's 5.9% fall over the past 3 months is part of a broader banks sell-off: the banks ETF KBE (State Street SPDR S&P Bank ETF) fell 6.8%, with BAC (Bank of America, down 15.8%) and RY (Royal Bank of Canada, down 4.8%). Its bank peers did not move as one over the past 3 months: JPM (JPMorgan Chase & Co.) fell 0.6%, while BAC fell 15.8%.
- **Past 1 to 3 years:** HSBC has run far ahead of the market, rising 47.7% over the past year against 15.8% for the S&P 500 and 17.9% for the Nasdaq 100. The same gap shows up over 3 years (201% against 89.3%). HSBC finished ahead of the S&P 500 in both 2024 and 2025.
- **Long term:** The past 5 years have been the better stretch: HSBC rose 318% against 81.7% for the S&P 500, after trailing over the decade. HSBC's 10-year return of 319% puts it ahead of 76% of the stocks worth at least $300 million with that much history. The S&P 500 returned 321%.
- **In a crash:** Across seven sell-offs, HSBC has typically fallen 1.2 times as far as the S&P 500.
- **Diversification:** Over 10 years HSBC kept more of the market's gains than of its losses: 79% of the S&P 500's gains in rising months and 53% of its losses in falling ones, with a beta of 0.58. Against the S&P 500, HSBC has a correlation of 0.37 over 5 years, less closely than 57% of stocks worth at least $300 million. Next to an index fund it is some diversification, but not a hedge.
- **Better options**
  - **Popular alternatives:** CM (Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce), BBVA (Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria) and MFG (Mizuho Financial Group) were ahead of HSBC in most short and long periods.
  - **Nearby categories and themes:** CIB (Grupo Cibest, banks) and NWG (NatWest Group, banks) were ahead of HSBC in most short and long periods, though with much bigger swings (32.9% and 34.1% volatility against 25.9%).
  - **Whole market:** Nothing in the whole market did better on both counts: none of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than HSBC with less volatility over the past 5 years.

## How much would $10,000 in HSBC have grown?

This chart tracks a hypothetical $10,000 investment in HSBC over the past 27 years, with dividends reinvested, alongside the same amount in the S&P 500, investments that ended ahead of HSBC over the same span and HSBC's popular alternatives, among those that traded for the entire period.

- $10,000 invested in HSBC at the end of September 1999 would have grown to $64,783 by September 2026, less than the $95,018 it would have become in SPY, an S&P 500 fund.
- Five of the eight other investments on the chart ended ahead of HSBC, and RY finished highest, at $500,230.

## HSBC at a glance

This section summarizes the key facts about the stock, its returns over periods from one to ten years and the risk it has carried, with dividends reinvested throughout.

- HSBC's deepest decline since it began trading in 1995 was 74.5%, from October 2007 to March 2009. It took about 15 years from the low to climb back to its old high.
- Over 27 full calendar years, HSBC's best was 2025, when it returned 67.9%, and its worst was 2008, when it lost 38.0%. It lost money in 11 of those years.
- HSBC is 13.6% below its all-time high.

- Type: Stock, Financials (Banks - Diversified)
- Trading since: September 25, 1995
- Market value: $324B
- Volatility (5 years): 25.9%; Sharpe ratio: 1.24
- Worst decline ever: −74.5%, from October 31, 2007 to March 11, 2009; back at its high by April 30, 2024

| Period | HSBC total return |
| --- | --- |
| 1 month | −10.1% |
| 3 months | −5.9% |
| 6 months | +2.3% |
| year to date | +19.8% |
| 1 year | +47.7% |
| 3 years | +201% |
| 5 years | +318% |
| 10 years | +319% |

## HSBC against the whole market

Where HSBC ranks among every stock and fund, and what across the market has done better.

### How does HSBC rank among all stocks?

This section ranks HSBC on return, volatility, risk-adjusted return and worst decline against every stock worth at least $300 million with enough history.

- On return for the risk taken (the Sharpe ratio), HSBC ranks in the top 1% of the 2,893 stocks worth at least $300 million.

| Measure | HSBC | Rank |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1-year return | +47.7% | 591 of 3,287 (top 18%) |
| 3-year return | +201% | 402 of 3,017 (top 14%) |
| 5-year return | +318% | 149 of 2,893 (top 6%) |
| 10-year return | +319% | 538 of 2,202 (top 25%) |
| Volatility, 5 years | 25.9% | 400 of 2,893 (top 14%) |
| Sharpe ratio, 5 years | 1.24 | 18 of 2,893 (top 1%) |
| Worst decline, past 10 years | −62.3% | 972 of 2,187 (top 45%) |

### What has beaten HSBC on both return and risk?

Each dot is an investment, placed by how much it earned a year over the past 5 years (higher is better) and how much its price swung, its volatility (further left is calmer).

- None of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than HSBC over the past 5 years with less volatility: nothing sits in the green region.

### Is there a better investment than HSBC?

The table below lists investments that beat HSBC over the past 5 years on at least one of these measures: a higher annual return with lower volatility, a higher annual return at similar volatility, a similar return with lower volatility, a higher Sharpe ratio with a smaller worst decline, a higher total return in most periods from 3 months to 10 years, or smaller losses in recent market crashes.

- Among HSBC's popular alternatives, CM, BBVA and MFG were ahead of HSBC in most short and long periods.
- Looking beyond its popular alternatives, CIB (banks) and NWG (banks) were ahead of HSBC in most short and long periods, though with much bigger swings (32.9% and 34.1% volatility against 25.9%).
- Nothing in the whole market did better on both counts: none of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than HSBC with less volatility over the past 5 years.

## HSBC against its popular alternatives

The investments people most often weigh against HSBC, compared period by period and year by year.

### How do HSBC's risk and return compare with its alternatives?

This map plots each investment's annual return over the past 5 years against its volatility, the size of its typical price swings.

- None of the 24 popular alternatives earned more than HSBC over the past 5 years with smaller price swings, so every higher return on the map came with a bumpier ride.
- Over the past 5 years, HSBC returned 33.1% a year, more than the S&P 500's 12.7%, with higher volatility (25.9% against 17.1%).

### Has HSBC consistently beaten its popular alternatives?

This section compares HSBC with the investments people most often weigh against it, checking each one over eight periods from one month to ten years.

- Two of the 24 popular alternatives, CM and MFG, outperformed HSBC in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes.

| Investment | 1Y return | 3Y return | 5Y return | 10Y return | Periods ahead of HSBC | Verdict | Sharpe |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| HSBC: HSBC Holdings plc (this page) | +47.7% | +201% | +318% | +319% |  |  | 1.24 |
| [CM](https://easycompare.io/research/cm): Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce | +44.4% | +261% | +141% | +395% | 4/5 short-term, 2/3 long-term | consistent | 0.93 |
| [MFG](https://easycompare.io/research/mfg): Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. | +53.1% | +216% | +326% | +345% | 4/5 short-term, 2/3 long-term | consistent | 1.10 |
| [BBVA](https://easycompare.io/research/bbva): Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, S.A. | +35.2% | +281% | +413% | +542% | 2/5 short-term, 3/3 long-term |  | 1.16 |
| [ING](https://easycompare.io/research/ing): ING Groep N.V. | +42.5% | +209% | +201% | +339% | 2/5 short-term, 2/3 long-term |  | 0.87 |
| [SAN](https://easycompare.io/research/san): Banco Santander, S.A. | +35.9% | +305% | +295% | +332% | 2/5 short-term, 2/3 long-term |  | 0.99 |
| [GS](https://easycompare.io/research/gs): The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. | +18.2% | +215% | +145% | +521% | 1/5 short-term, 2/3 long-term |  | 0.77 |
| [SMFG](https://easycompare.io/research/smfg): Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc. | +53.5% | +181% | +327% | +474% | 5/5 short-term, 1/3 long-term |  | 1.14 |
| [MUFG](https://easycompare.io/research/mufg): Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc. | +41.3% | +184% | +319% | +483% | 4/5 short-term, 1/3 long-term |  | 1.13 |
| [MA](https://easycompare.io/research/ma): Mastercard Incorporated | +10.3% | +64.3% | +79.2% | +541% | 3/5 short-term, 1/3 long-term |  | 0.61 |
| [JPM](https://easycompare.io/research/jpm): JPMorgan Chase & Co. | +13.0% | +150% | +122% | +537% | 3/5 short-term, 1/3 long-term |  | 0.78 |
| [V](https://easycompare.io/research/v): Visa Inc. | +19.0% | +78.2% | +82.5% | +429% | 3/5 short-term, 1/3 long-term |  | 0.64 |
| [RY](https://easycompare.io/research/ry): Royal Bank of Canada | +39.2% | +173% | +122% | +352% | 3/5 short-term, 1/3 long-term |  | 0.97 |
| [UBS](https://easycompare.io/research/ubs): UBS Group AG | +26.3% | +116% | +210% | +374% | 2/5 short-term, 1/3 long-term |  | 0.90 |
| [C](https://easycompare.io/research/c): Citigroup Inc. | +26.0% | +238% | +102% | +234% | 2/5 short-term, 1/3 long-term |  | 0.63 |
| [MS](https://easycompare.io/research/ms): Morgan Stanley | +13.9% | +170% | +110% | +627% | 0/5 short-term, 1/3 long-term |  | 0.66 |
| [BCS](https://easycompare.io/research/bcs): Barclays PLC | +15.1% | +242% | +134% | +238% | 0/5 short-term, 1/3 long-term |  | 0.67 |
| [DB](https://easycompare.io/research/db): Deutsche Bank AG | −3.1% | +244% | +171% | +165% | 0/5 short-term, 1/3 long-term |  | 0.72 |
| [TD](https://easycompare.io/research/td): The Toronto-Dominion Bank | +57.5% | +141% | +109% | +310% | 5/5 short-term, 0/3 long-term |  | 0.84 |
| [BNS](https://easycompare.io/research/bns): The Bank of Nova Scotia | +50.0% | +162% | +83.1% | +187% | 5/5 short-term, 0/3 long-term |  | 0.71 |
| [BMO](https://easycompare.io/research/bmo): Bank of Montreal | +37.6% | +146% | +89.4% | +295% | 4/5 short-term, 0/3 long-term |  | 0.71 |
| [WFC](https://easycompare.io/research/wfc): Wells Fargo & Company | −2.4% | +119% | +85.0% | +141% | 2/5 short-term, 0/3 long-term |  | 0.57 |
| EWH: iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF | +8.2% | +51.1% | +7.7% | +42.7% | 2/5 short-term, 0/3 long-term |  | 0.17 |
| [LYG](https://easycompare.io/research/lyg): Lloyds Banking Group plc | +22.4% | +207% | +152% | +213% | 1/5 short-term, 0/3 long-term |  | 0.74 |
| [BAC](https://easycompare.io/research/bac): Bank of America Corporation | −0.6% | +107% | +21.6% | +282% | 0/5 short-term, 0/3 long-term |  | 0.28 |

### How did HSBC do year by year?

This table shows each investment's total return in every full calendar year since 1997, along with where HSBC ranked among its popular alternatives each year.

- HSBC finished ahead of the S&P 500 in 11 of its 27 full calendar years, and ahead of it in each of the last four.
- Among its popular alternatives, RY came out ahead of HSBC most often, in 18 of the 27 years both traded.
- Ranked against its popular alternatives each year, HSBC finished in the top quarter in five of 27 years and in the bottom quarter in five. In 2025, it ranked 9 of 25.

| Year | HSBC | SPY |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2025 | +67.9% | +17.7% |
| 2024 | +34.5% | +24.9% |
| 2023 | +39.3% | +26.2% |
| 2022 | +7.8% | −18.2% |
| 2021 | +20.8% | +28.7% |
| 2020 | −31.7% | +18.3% |
| 2019 | +1.5% | +31.2% |
| 2018 | −16.1% | −4.6% |
| 2017 | +35.9% | +21.7% |
| 2016 | +9.9% | +12.0% |

## Risk and diversification

How HSBC has fallen, how it held up in crashes beside the S&P 500 and its popular alternatives, and what moves independently of it.

### What were HSBC's worst declines?

A drawdown is the decline from a peak to the lowest point before a new high.

- In all five of HSBC's worst declines, the S&P 500 held up better over the same dates.
- Not every decline was the market's doing: HSBC fell 41.2% from August 1997 to January 1998, while the S&P 500 slipped only 1.1%.
- The slowest recovery came after HSBC fell 74.5% from October 2007 to March 2009; it did not regain that peak until April 2024, 15 years later.

| Decline | Peak | Low | Back at the high | SPY over the same dates | Market event |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| −74.5% | October 31, 2007 | March 11, 2009 | April 30, 2024 | −51.6% | 2008 financial crisis |
| −41.4% | January 26, 2001 | September 21, 2001 | October 6, 2003 | −27.7% | dot-com bust |
| −41.2% | August 11, 1997 | January 9, 1998 | July 16, 1999 | −1.1% |  |
| −22.4% | December 31, 1999 | March 7, 2000 | August 7, 2000 | −6.7% |  |
| −21.8% | March 5, 2025 | April 8, 2025 | May 19, 2025 | −14.6% |  |

### How did HSBC do in stock market crashes?

This section measures how far HSBC, the S&P 500 and each alternative fell from peak to trough during every major market crash since 2000.

- Among its popular alternatives, RY held up best, falling less than HSBC in six of the ten crashes they both traded through.
- HSBC fell less than the S&P 500 in five of the ten crashes it has traded through. The clearest case was the Covid crash, when HSBC fell 20.5% and the S&P 500 fell 33.7%.

| Crash | Dates | HSBC fall | SPY fall |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Dot-com bust | March 10, 2000 to October 9, 2002 | −41.4% | −47.5% |
| Global financial crisis | October 9, 2007 to March 9, 2009 | −73.8% | −55.2% |
| Flash crash | May 6, 2010 to May 7, 2010 | 0.0% | −1.5% |
| Euro debt crisis | July 22, 2011 to October 3, 2011 | −25.1% | −17.9% |
| China devaluation & oil rout | August 10, 2015 to February 11, 2016 | −30.8% | −12.8% |
| Volmageddon | February 2, 2018 to February 9, 2018 | −4.6% | −6.5% |
| Q4 2018 selloff | September 21, 2018 to December 24, 2018 | −13.1% | −19.3% |
| COVID crash | February 19, 2020 to March 23, 2020 | −20.5% | −33.7% |
| 2022 bear market | January 4, 2022 to October 12, 2022 | −31.8% | −24.5% |
| SVB / regional bank stress | March 8, 2023 to March 13, 2023 | −7.3% | −3.4% |

### How closely does HSBC move with the S&P 500?

Upside capture measures how much of the S&P 500's gains an investment kept in the months the market rose, and downside capture how much of its losses it took in the months the market fell.

- Over the past 10 years, HSBC captured 79% of the S&P 500's gains in rising months and 53% of its losses in falling months, with a beta of 0.58. That is a defensive profile: it gave up some of the market's upside in exchange for smaller losses.
- Only MUFG, SMFG and MFG had a higher capture ratio (upside capture divided by downside capture) than HSBC's 1.49, out of 24 popular alternatives with the same record.
- MFG took just 42% of the S&P 500's losses, against 53% for HSBC, while still keeping 75% of its gains.

Measured over the past 10 years of monthly returns against SPY.

| Investment | Upside capture | Downside capture | Beta |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| HSBC: HSBC Holdings plc (this page) | 79.0% | 53.0% | 0.58 |
| [CM](https://easycompare.io/research/cm): Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce | 108% | 106% | 1.07 |
| [MFG](https://easycompare.io/research/mfg): Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. | 75.0% | 42.0% | 0.54 |
| [BBVA](https://easycompare.io/research/bbva): Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, S.A. | 121% | 97.0% | 1.11 |
| [ING](https://easycompare.io/research/ing): ING Groep N.V. | 136% | 155% | 1.36 |
| [SAN](https://easycompare.io/research/san): Banco Santander, S.A. | 101% | 92.0% | 1.02 |
| [GS](https://easycompare.io/research/gs): The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. | 136% | 133% | 1.39 |
| [SMFG](https://easycompare.io/research/smfg): Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc. | 84.0% | 43.0% | 0.65 |
| [MUFG](https://easycompare.io/research/mufg): Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc. | 84.0% | 42.0% | 0.66 |
| [MA](https://easycompare.io/research/ma): Mastercard Incorporated | 105% | 88.0% | 0.95 |
| [JPM](https://easycompare.io/research/jpm): JPMorgan Chase & Co. | 117% | 103% | 1.09 |
| [V](https://easycompare.io/research/v): Visa Inc. | 93.0% | 79.0% | 0.87 |
| [RY](https://easycompare.io/research/ry): Royal Bank of Canada | 97.0% | 88.0% | 0.88 |
| [UBS](https://easycompare.io/research/ubs): UBS Group AG | 116% | 120% | 1.18 |
| [C](https://easycompare.io/research/c): Citigroup Inc. | 131% | 165% | 1.49 |
| [MS](https://easycompare.io/research/ms): Morgan Stanley | 142% | 137% | 1.39 |
| [BCS](https://easycompare.io/research/bcs): Barclays PLC | 113% | 131% | 1.26 |
| [DB](https://easycompare.io/research/db): Deutsche Bank AG | 102% | 118% | 1.21 |
| [TD](https://easycompare.io/research/td): The Toronto-Dominion Bank | 89.0% | 80.0% | 0.88 |
| [BNS](https://easycompare.io/research/bns): The Bank of Nova Scotia | 97.0% | 120% | 1.05 |
| [BMO](https://easycompare.io/research/bmo): Bank of Montreal | 104% | 112% | 1.12 |
| [WFC](https://easycompare.io/research/wfc): Wells Fargo & Company | 96.0% | 129% | 1.13 |
| EWH: iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF | 54.0% | 84.0% | 0.54 |
| [LYG](https://easycompare.io/research/lyg): Lloyds Banking Group plc | 106% | 130% | 1.20 |
| [BAC](https://easycompare.io/research/bac): Bank of America Corporation | 127% | 146% | 1.36 |

### What diversifies HSBC?

Correlation measures how closely two investments move together, on a scale from 1 (in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to -1 (in opposite directions).

- Moving a fifth of the money in HSBC into CAH would have cut the portfolio's volatility by 17% over the past 5 years and raised its annual return (+38.7% for HSBC alone, +39.8% for the mix).
- Among large ETFs, DXJ, EMLP and HDV have moved largely independently of HSBC over the past 5 years, with correlations of 0.46 or lower, and each still earned a positive 5-year return.
- FIX made money in seven of the 11 calendar years in which HSBC lost money.

| Investment | Correlation with HSBC | 5Y return | Volatility | Sharpe | Rose in HSBC's 11 down years |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| DXJ: WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund | 0.35 | +225% | 19.1% | 1.34 | 3 of 11 |
| EMLP: First Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund | 0.40 | +101% | 14.5% | 1.04 | 1 of 11 |
| HDV: iShares Core High Dividend ETF | 0.46 | +83.3% | 13.0% | 1.00 | 1 of 11 |
| [SMH](https://easycompare.io/research/smh): VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.26 | +323% | 36.9% | 0.97 | 6 of 11 |
| [GLD](https://easycompare.io/research/gld): SPDR Gold Shares | 0.24 | +126% | 18.9% | 0.96 | 6 of 11 |
| SPMO: Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 0.15 | +136% | 20.8% | 0.93 | 1 of 11 |
| [XLE](https://easycompare.io/research/xle): State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | 0.31 | +177% | 25.5% | 0.93 | 4 of 11 |
| [VTV](https://easycompare.io/research/vtv): Vanguard Morningstar Value ETF | 0.46 | +76.6% | 13.7% | 0.90 | 5 of 11 |

## Common questions

### What was HSBC's worst drawdown?

HSBC's deepest decline since it began trading in 1995 was 74.5%, from October 2007 to March 2009. It took about 15 years from the low to climb back to its old high.

### What were HSBC's best and worst years?

Over 27 full calendar years, HSBC's best year was 2025, when it returned 67.9%. Its worst was 2008, with a return of -38.0%.

### Is there a better investment than HSBC?

Among HSBC's popular alternatives, CM, BBVA and MFG were ahead of HSBC in most short and long periods. Looking beyond its popular alternatives, CIB (banks) and NWG (banks) were ahead of HSBC in most short and long periods, though with much bigger swings (32.9% and 34.1% volatility against 25.9%).

### Is HSBC more volatile than the S&P 500?

Yes. HSBC's volatility over the past 5 years was 25.9%, 1.5 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, HSBC's return lands within 25.9% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump.

### What is HSBC's Sharpe ratio?

HSBC's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 1.24, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so HSBC earned more for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings.

### How correlated is HSBC with the S&P 500?

Over the past 5 years, HSBC's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.37 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They are only loosely linked, which makes it a real diversifier next to an index fund. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against HSBC instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a HSBC holding.

### What are the best alternatives to HSBC?

Of the 24 popular alternatives we compared, two outperformed HSBC in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes, with dividends reinvested: CM and MFG.

### Did HSBC outperform the S&P 500?

HSBC finished ahead of the S&P 500 (SPY) in 11 of 27 full calendar years. In 2025, it returned +67.9%, against +17.7% for the index.

### How did HSBC do in stock market crashes?

HSBC fell less than the S&P 500 (SPY) in five of the ten major crashes it has traded through, and further in five. The clearest case was the Covid crash, when HSBC fell 20.5% and the S&P 500 fell 33.7%.

### What diversifies HSBC?

These had a low correlation with HSBC over the past 5 years and still earned a positive 5-year return: among large ETFs, DXJ (correlation 0.35), EMLP (correlation 0.40) and HDV (correlation 0.46); among large stocks, CAH (correlation 0.00), CLS (correlation 0.16) and FIX (correlation 0.05). A correlation near zero means the two have moved largely independently.

## More research

- [Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce (CM) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/cm)
- [Mizuho Financial Group (MFG) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/mfg)
- [Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria (BBVA) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/bbva)
- [ING Groep (ING) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/ing)
- [Banco Santander (SAN) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/san)
- [Goldman Sachs Group (GS) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/gs)
- [Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group (SMFG) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/smfg)
- [Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group (MUFG) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/mufg)
- [Mastercard (MA) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/ma)
- [JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/jpm)
- [Visa (V) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/v)
- [Royal Bank of Canada (RY) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/ry)

## Explore further

- Full page with charts: https://easycompare.io/research/hsbc
- All research pages: https://easycompare.io/llms.txt
- Compare the entire market against HSBC live: https://betterthanspy.com/?b=HSBC&utm_source=easycompare&utm_medium=research