# How iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF (DYNF) compares with the whole market and its popular alternatives

> Source: EasyCompare research, https://easycompare.io/research/dynf
> Data as of October 20, 2026. Total returns include reinvested dividends. Past performance does not predict future results; nothing here is investment advice.

Built by QuantCommons' quantitative engine, this page is about relative opportunity, not data on DYNF alone. It places DYNF (iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF) against 20+ popular alternatives, its neighboring categories and the entire market of over 10,000 U.S.-listed stocks and ETFs, and surfaces what has done better on consistent outperformance, return for the risk taken, behavior in real market crashes and diversification. The result is a clearer view of where DYNF stands in the market, and of the alternatives worth a closer look.

Period covered: DYNF's full trading record, from March 2019 through September 2026. The crash tests reach back to 2000 using older funds and the S&P 500. All returns include reinvested dividends. Data as of October 20, 2026.

## Key findings

- **What you're buying:** For a correlation of 0.99 with the S&P 500, DYNF is effectively an S&P 500 fund, while charging 0.26% a year against VOO's 0.03%.
- **Right now:** Not every peer went the same way. Over the past 3 months, USMV (iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF) rose 6.4% and MTUM (iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF) fell 2.0%. Both DYNF and the S&P 500 are within a few percent of a record high.
- **Fund or market?:** DYNF rose 3.4% over the past 3 months, in line with the US multifactor equity ETF LRGF (iShares U.S. Equity Factor ETF), which rose 4.3%. The S&P 500 rose 3.9%. Its similar funds did not move as one over the past 3 months: USMV (iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF) rose 6.4%, while MTUM (iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF) fell 2.0%.
- **Long term:** Over the past 5 years, DYNF returned 14.7% a year against 12.7% a year for the S&P 500 (98.5% in total against 81.7%). DYNF's 5-year return of 98.5% puts it ahead of 92% of the ETFs with at least $100 million in assets with that much history. The S&P 500 returned 81.7%.
- **In a crash:** The 2022 bear market took 26.0% off DYNF, against 24.5% for the S&P 500. That was more than USMV (iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF, 17.0%) but less than QUAL (iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF, 27.5%).
- **Diversification:** DYNF is more of the same, not a cushion: a correlation of 0.99 with the S&P 500 over 5 years and 0.99 with the total US market, more closely than 96% of ETFs with at least $100 million in assets. When the S&P 500 had a down month, DYNF usually fell with it (20 of 22 months).
- **Better options**
  - **Popular alternatives:** SPMO (Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF) was ahead of DYNF in most short and long periods.
  - **Nearby categories and themes:** PVAL (Putnam Focused Large Cap Value ETF, US large-cap value) earned more than DYNF with less volatility over the past 5 years: 16.1% a year at 15.1% volatility, against 14.7% a year at 17.5%.
  - **Whole market:** Few investments have done better on both counts: only two of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than DYNF with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them PVAL (Putnam Focused Large Cap Value ETF) and LVHI (Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF).

## How much would $10,000 in DYNF have grown?

This chart tracks a hypothetical $10,000 investment in DYNF over the past 7 years, with dividends reinvested, alongside the same amount in the S&P 500, investments that ended ahead of DYNF over the same span and DYNF's popular alternatives, among those that traded for the entire period.

- $10,000 invested in DYNF at the end of September 2019 would have grown to $29,610 by September 2026, more than the $28,402 it would have become in SPY, an S&P 500 fund.
- Five of the eight other investments on the chart ended ahead of DYNF, and CAH finished highest, at $56,098.

## DYNF at a glance

This section summarizes the key facts about the fund, its returns over periods from one to ten years and the risk it has carried, with dividends reinvested throughout.

- DYNF's deepest decline since it began trading in 2019 was 34.7%, from February to March 2020. It took six months from the low to climb back to its old high.
- Over six full calendar years, DYNF's best was 2023, when it returned 36.2%, and its worst was 2022, when it lost 20.3%. It lost money in one of those years.
- DYNF is 2.3% below its all-time high.

- Type: ETF, Broad Market (Asset Management)
- Trading since: March 21, 2019
- Assets: $42B
- Expense ratio: 0.26%
- Volatility (5 years): 17.5%; Sharpe ratio: 0.87
- Worst decline ever: −34.7%, from February 19, 2020 to March 23, 2020; back at its high by September 2, 2020

| Period | DYNF total return |
| --- | --- |
| 1 month | −1.9% |
| 3 months | +3.4% |
| 6 months | +9.1% |
| year to date | +14.1% |
| 1 year | +17.1% |
| 3 years | +106% |
| 5 years | +98.5% |

## DYNF against the whole market

Where DYNF ranks among every stock and fund, and what across the market has done better.

### How does DYNF rank among all ETFs?

This section ranks DYNF on return, volatility, risk-adjusted return and worst decline against every ETF worth at least $100 million with enough history.

- DYNF's 5-year return ranks in the top 8% of the 1,560 ETFs with at least $100 million in assets with 5 years of history.

| Measure | DYNF | Rank |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1-year return | +17.1% | 616 of 2,485 (top 25%) |
| 3-year return | +106% | 194 of 1,949 (top 10%) |
| 5-year return | +98.5% | 128 of 1,560 (top 9%) |
| Volatility, 5 years | 17.5% | 914 of 1,560 (top 59%) |
| Sharpe ratio, 5 years | 0.87 | 231 of 1,560 (top 15%) |

### What has beaten DYNF on both return and risk?

Each dot is an investment, placed by how much it earned a year over the past 5 years (higher is better) and how much its price swung, its volatility (further left is calmer).

- Two ETFs worth at least $500 million sit in the green region: each earned more than DYNF over the past 5 years with smaller price swings. That is fewer than 1% of the 3,633 screened. Few investments beat it on both counts.
- Among those with at least half DYNF's swings, LVHI has the best return for its risk: 17.0% a year at 11.1% volatility, 37% less than DYNF's 17.5%, and a Sharpe ratio (return above cash per unit of volatility) of 1.48 against 0.87 for DYNF.
- None of DYNF's popular alternatives made it, but PVAL (US large-cap value) did: 16.1% a year at 15.1% volatility, 14% less than DYNF's 17.5%.

### Is there a better investment than DYNF?

The table below lists investments that beat DYNF over the past 5 years on at least one of these measures: a higher annual return with lower volatility, a higher annual return at similar volatility, a similar return with lower volatility, a higher Sharpe ratio with a smaller worst decline, a higher total return in most periods from 3 months to 10 years, or smaller losses in recent market crashes, and, for funds, the same exposure at a lower expense ratio.

- Among DYNF's popular alternatives, SPMO was ahead of DYNF in most short and long periods.
- Looking beyond its popular alternatives, PVAL (US large-cap value) earned more than DYNF with less volatility over the past 5 years: 16.1% a year at 15.1% volatility, against 14.7% a year at 17.5%.
- Few investments have done better on both counts: only two of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than DYNF with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them PVAL and LVHI.

The 2 strongest of 2 investments that beat DYNF over the past 5 years, out of 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million.

| Investment | Group | Annual return (5 years) | Volatility | Sharpe | Worst decline (10 years) | 5Y return | Correlation with DYNF | Better on |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| DYNF: iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF (this page) |  | +14.7% | 17.5% | 0.87 | −34.7% | +98.5% |  |  |
| LVHI: Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | International Equity | +17.0% | 11.1% | 1.48 | −32.4% | +119% | 0.51 | Higher return, lower volatility; Smaller losses in recent crashes |
| PVAL: Putnam Focused Large Cap Value ETF | US Large-Cap Value | +16.1% | 15.1% | 1.07 | −41.3% | +111% | 0.85 | Higher return, lower volatility |

## DYNF against its popular alternatives

The investments people most often weigh against DYNF, compared period by period and year by year.

### How do DYNF's risk and return compare with its alternatives?

This map plots each investment's annual return over the past 5 years against its volatility, the size of its typical price swings.

- None of the 20 popular alternatives earned more than DYNF over the past 5 years with smaller price swings, so every higher return on the map came with a bumpier ride.
- Over the past 5 years, DYNF returned 14.7% a year, more than the S&P 500's 12.7%, with higher volatility (17.5% against 17.1%).

### Has DYNF consistently beaten its popular alternatives?

This section compares DYNF with the investments people most often weigh against it, checking each one over seven periods from one month to five years.

- Only one of the 22 popular alternatives, SPMO, outperformed DYNF in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 2 long-term timeframes.
- SPMO, JQUA and FLQL earned more for the risk they took than DYNF (a higher Sharpe ratio) and fell less in their worst decline of the past 10 years.

| Investment | 1Y return | 3Y return | 5Y return | Periods ahead of DYNF | Verdict | Sharpe |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| DYNF: iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF (this page) | +17.1% | +106% | +98.5% |  |  | 0.87 |
| SPMO: Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | +18.1% | +156% | +136% | 3/5 short-term, 2/2 long-term | consistent | 0.93 |
| MTUM: iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF | +17.2% | +119% | +68.0% | 1/5 short-term, 1/2 long-term |  | 0.58 |
| JQUA: JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF | +22.2% | +84.2% | +88.9% | 5/5 short-term, 0/2 long-term |  | 0.89 |
| [VTV](https://easycompare.io/research/vtv): Vanguard Morningstar Value ETF | +22.5% | +77.9% | +76.6% | 5/5 short-term, 0/2 long-term |  | 0.90 |
| OMFL: Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF | +19.5% | +66.6% | +54.1% | 5/5 short-term, 0/2 long-term |  | 0.61 |
| ROUS: Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF | +21.1% | +81.7% | +78.6% | 4/5 short-term, 0/2 long-term |  | 0.88 |
| LRGF: iShares U.S. Equity Factor ETF | +15.0% | +91.5% | +89.8% | 3/5 short-term, 0/2 long-term |  | 0.84 |
| AVUS: Avantis U.S. Equity ETF | +19.9% | +87.2% | +77.9% | 3/5 short-term, 0/2 long-term |  | 0.76 |
| [QUAL](https://easycompare.io/research/qual): iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF | +16.4% | +76.9% | +71.5% | 3/5 short-term, 0/2 long-term |  | 0.71 |
| GSLC: Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF | +14.0% | +83.5% | +73.1% | 2/5 short-term, 0/2 long-term |  | 0.74 |
| QUS: State Street SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF | +15.9% | +71.9% | +69.3% | 2/5 short-term, 0/2 long-term |  | 0.81 |
| DEUS: Xtrackers Russell US Multifactor ETF | +16.6% | +66.2% | +54.6% | 2/5 short-term, 0/2 long-term |  | 0.65 |
| USMV: iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF | +9.7% | +49.7% | +44.4% | 2/5 short-term, 0/2 long-term |  | 0.66 |
| [SPY](https://easycompare.io/research/spy): State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | +15.8% | +89.3% | +81.7% | 1/5 short-term, 0/2 long-term |  | 0.79 |
| DFUS: Dimensional U.S. Equity ETF | +15.7% | +88.9% | +78.8% | 1/5 short-term, 0/2 long-term |  | 0.76 |
| [VUG](https://easycompare.io/research/vug): Vanguard Morningstar Growth ETF | +10.2% | +100% | +78.6% | 1/5 short-term, 0/2 long-term |  | 0.63 |
| DFAU: Dimensional - US Core Equity Market ETF | +16.2% | +86.3% | +76.9% | 1/5 short-term, 0/2 long-term |  | 0.76 |
| SPHQ: Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF | +14.9% | +75.6% | +76.1% | 1/5 short-term, 0/2 long-term |  | 0.76 |
| [VTI](https://easycompare.io/research/vti): Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF | +15.2% | +87.9% | +72.6% | 1/5 short-term, 0/2 long-term |  | 0.71 |
| SPLV: Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF | +4.6% | +36.8% | +30.8% | 1/5 short-term, 0/2 long-term |  | 0.49 |
| FLQL: Franklin U.S. Large Cap Multifactor Index ETF | +15.3% | +90.5% | +90.8% | 0/5 short-term, 0/2 long-term |  | 0.88 |
| [IWM](https://easycompare.io/research/iwm): iShares Russell 2000 ETF | +12.3% | +71.3% | +29.0% | 0/5 short-term, 0/2 long-term |  | 0.34 |

### How did DYNF do year by year?

This table shows each investment's total return in every full calendar year since 2020, along with where DYNF ranked among its popular alternatives each year.

- DYNF finished ahead of the S&P 500 in three of its six full calendar years, and ahead of it in each of the last three.
- Ranked against its popular alternatives each year, DYNF finished in the top quarter in three of six years and in the bottom quarter in one. In 2025, it ranked 3 of 21.
- Among its popular alternatives, SPMO came out ahead of DYNF most often, in four of the six years both traded.

| Year | DYNF | SPY |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2025 | +20.0% | +17.7% |
| 2024 | +30.3% | +24.9% |
| 2023 | +36.2% | +26.2% |
| 2022 | −20.3% | −18.2% |
| 2021 | +24.9% | +28.7% |
| 2020 | +13.5% | +18.3% |

## Risk and diversification

How DYNF has fallen, how it held up in crashes beside the S&P 500 and its popular alternatives, and what moves independently of it.

### What were DYNF's worst declines?

A drawdown is the decline from a peak to the lowest point before a new high.

- In four of DYNF's five worst declines, the S&P 500 held up better over the same dates.
- None of these declines kept DYNF below its old high for long; the longest climb back took ten months.

| Decline | Peak | Low | Back at the high | SPY over the same dates | Market event |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| −34.7% | February 19, 2020 | March 23, 2020 | September 2, 2020 | −33.7% | Covid crash |
| −27.0% | November 16, 2021 | September 30, 2022 | July 28, 2023 | −22.7% | 2022 bear market |
| −18.7% | February 19, 2025 | April 8, 2025 | June 25, 2025 | −18.8% |  |
| −10.5% | July 31, 2023 | October 27, 2023 | November 20, 2023 | −10.0% |  |
| −9.3% | July 16, 2024 | August 5, 2024 | September 19, 2024 | −8.4% |  |

### How did DYNF do in stock market crashes?

This section measures how far DYNF, the S&P 500 and each alternative fell from peak to trough during every major market crash since 2000.

- DYNF fell further than the S&P 500 in two of the three crashes it has traded through. The clearest case was the 2022 bear market, when DYNF fell 26.0% and the S&P 500 fell 24.5%.
- Among its popular alternatives, SPMO held up best, falling less than DYNF in all three crashes they both traded through.
- DYNF began trading after the 2008 financial crisis, but five of its popular alternatives lived through it. The mildest fall among them was VUG's 50.7%, against 55.2% for the S&P 500.

| Crash | Dates | DYNF fall | SPY fall |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Dot-com bust | March 10, 2000 to October 9, 2002 | not trading | −47.5% |
| Global financial crisis | October 9, 2007 to March 9, 2009 | not trading | −55.2% |
| Flash crash | May 6, 2010 to May 7, 2010 | not trading | −1.5% |
| Euro debt crisis | July 22, 2011 to October 3, 2011 | not trading | −17.9% |
| China devaluation & oil rout | August 10, 2015 to February 11, 2016 | not trading | −12.8% |
| Volmageddon | February 2, 2018 to February 9, 2018 | not trading | −6.5% |
| Q4 2018 selloff | September 21, 2018 to December 24, 2018 | not trading | −19.3% |
| COVID crash | February 19, 2020 to March 23, 2020 | −34.7% | −33.7% |
| 2022 bear market | January 4, 2022 to October 12, 2022 | −26.0% | −24.5% |
| SVB / regional bank stress | March 8, 2023 to March 13, 2023 | −3.6% | −3.4% |

### How closely does DYNF move with the S&P 500?

Upside capture measures how much of the S&P 500's gains an investment kept in the months the market rose, and downside capture how much of its losses it took in the months the market fell.

- Only SPMO, MTUM and FLQL had a higher capture ratio (upside capture divided by downside capture) than DYNF's 1.09, out of 20 popular alternatives with the same record.
- SPMO took just 71% of the S&P 500's losses, against 97% for DYNF, while still keeping 107% of its gains.
- Over the past 5 years, DYNF captured 106% of the S&P 500's gains in rising months and 97% of its losses in falling months, with a beta of 1.02. Its share of the market's gains was slightly larger than its share of the losses.

Measured over the past 5 years of monthly returns against SPY.

| Investment | Upside capture | Downside capture | Beta |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| DYNF: iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF (this page) | 106% | 97.0% | 1.02 |
| SPMO: Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 107% | 71.0% | 1.09 |
| MTUM: iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF | 90.0% | 81.0% | 1.06 |
| JQUA: JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF | 94.0% | 88.0% | 0.90 |
| [VTV](https://easycompare.io/research/vtv): Vanguard Morningstar Value ETF | 84.0% | 79.0% | 0.75 |
| OMFL: Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF | 87.0% | 99.0% | 0.94 |
| ROUS: Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF | 86.0% | 81.0% | 0.83 |
| LRGF: iShares U.S. Equity Factor ETF | 100% | 95.0% | 0.98 |
| AVUS: Avantis U.S. Equity ETF | 99.0% | 101% | 1.00 |
| [QUAL](https://easycompare.io/research/qual): iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF | 97.0% | 102% | 1.00 |
| GSLC: Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF | 97.0% | 101% | 0.98 |
| QUS: State Street SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF | 86.0% | 88.0% | 0.83 |
| DEUS: Xtrackers Russell US Multifactor ETF | 83.0% | 95.0% | 0.86 |
| USMV: iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF | 65.0% | 74.0% | 0.64 |
| DFUS: Dimensional U.S. Equity ETF | 100% | 101% | 1.01 |
| [VUG](https://easycompare.io/research/vug): Vanguard Morningstar Growth ETF | 112% | 120% | 1.22 |
| SPHQ: Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF | 88.0% | 82.0% | 0.90 |
| [VTI](https://easycompare.io/research/vti): Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF | 99.0% | 104% | 1.01 |
| SPLV: Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF | 51.0% | 60.0% | 0.53 |
| FLQL: Franklin U.S. Large Cap Multifactor Index ETF | 97.0% | 89.0% | 0.95 |
| [IWM](https://easycompare.io/research/iwm): iShares Russell 2000 ETF | 97.0% | 135% | 1.13 |

### What diversifies DYNF?

Correlation measures how closely two investments move together, on a scale from 1 (in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to -1 (in opposite directions).

- Moving a fifth of the money in DYNF into DBMF would have cut the portfolio's volatility by 23% over the past 5 years for a small cut in its annual return (+16.1% for DYNF alone, +15.3% for the mix).
- Among large ETFs, GCOW, MLPX and GLD have moved largely independently of DYNF over the past 5 years, with correlations of 0.49 or lower, and each still earned a positive 5-year return.
- In 2022, the one year DYNF lost money (-20.3%), DBMF returned +21.6%.

| Investment | Correlation with DYNF | 5Y return | Volatility | Sharpe | Rose in DYNF's 1 down years |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| GCOW: Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF | 0.47 | +93.4% | 13.6% | 1.04 | 1 of 1 |
| MLPX: Global X - MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF | 0.49 | +135% | 19.7% | 0.97 | 1 of 1 |
| [GLD](https://easycompare.io/research/gld): SPDR Gold Shares | 0.12 | +126% | 18.9% | 0.96 | 0 of 1 |
| [XLE](https://easycompare.io/research/xle): State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | 0.24 | +177% | 25.5% | 0.93 | 1 of 1 |
| AMLP: Alerian MLP ETF | 0.42 | +111% | 18.9% | 0.89 | 1 of 1 |
| DBMF: iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF | -0.29 | +59.7% | 12.4% | 0.82 | 1 of 1 |
| DBA: Invesco DB Agriculture Fund | 0.13 | +66.4% | 13.8% | 0.81 | 1 of 1 |
| IHE: iShares U.S. Pharmaceuticals ETF | 0.48 | +81.2% | 16.8% | 0.80 | 0 of 1 |

## Common questions

### What was DYNF's worst drawdown?

DYNF's deepest decline since it began trading in 2019 was 34.7%, from February to March 2020. It took six months from the low to climb back to its old high. Because DYNF launched in March 2019, that record does not include the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or five other sell-offs.

### What were DYNF's best and worst years?

Over six full calendar years, DYNF's best year was 2023, when it returned 36.2%. Its worst was 2022, with a return of -20.3%.

### Is there a better investment than DYNF?

Among DYNF's popular alternatives, SPMO was ahead of DYNF in most short and long periods. Looking beyond its popular alternatives, PVAL (US large-cap value) earned more than DYNF with less volatility over the past 5 years: 16.1% a year at 15.1% volatility, against 14.7% a year at 17.5%.

### Is DYNF more volatile than the S&P 500?

Yes. DYNF's volatility over the past 5 years was 17.5%, 1.0 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, DYNF's return lands within 17.5% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump.

### What is DYNF's Sharpe ratio?

DYNF's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.87, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so DYNF earned more for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings.

### How correlated is DYNF with the S&P 500?

Over the past 5 years, DYNF's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.99 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They move almost in lockstep, so holding both adds little diversification. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against DYNF instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a DYNF holding.

### What are the best alternatives to DYNF?

Of the 22 popular alternatives we compared, one outperformed DYNF in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 2 long-term timeframes, with dividends reinvested: SPMO.

### Did DYNF outperform the S&P 500?

DYNF finished ahead of the S&P 500 (SPY) in three of six full calendar years. In 2025, it returned +20.0%, against +17.7% for the index.

### How did DYNF do in stock market crashes?

DYNF fell less than the S&P 500 (SPY) in none of the three major crashes it has traded through, and further in two. The clearest case was the 2022 bear market, when DYNF fell 26.0% and the S&P 500 fell 24.5%.

### What diversifies DYNF?

These had a low correlation with DYNF over the past 5 years and still earned a positive 5-year return: among large ETFs, GCOW (correlation 0.47), MLPX (correlation 0.49) and GLD (correlation 0.12); among large stocks, CAH (correlation 0.28), MCK (correlation 0.15) and MPC (correlation 0.23). A correlation near zero means the two have moved largely independently.

## More research

- [Vanguard Morningstar Value ETF (VTV) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/vtv)
- [iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF (QUAL) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/qual)
- [State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/spy)
- [Vanguard Morningstar Growth ETF (VUG) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/vug)
- [Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/vti)
- [iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/iwm)
- [Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/schd)
- [NVIDIA (NVDA) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/nvda)
- [Apple (AAPL) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/aapl)
- [Alphabet (GOOG) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/goog)
- [Microsoft (MSFT) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/msft)
- [Amazon.com (AMZN) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/amzn)

## Explore further

- Full page with charts: https://easycompare.io/research/dynf
- All research pages: https://easycompare.io/llms.txt
- Compare the entire market against DYNF live: https://betterthanspy.com/?b=DYNF&utm_source=easycompare&utm_medium=research