# How EIDP, Inc. USD 4.50 Cum Pfd Registered Shs (CTA-PB) compares with the whole market and its popular alternatives

> Source: EasyCompare research, https://easycompare.io/research/cta-pb
> Data as of October 20, 2026. Total returns include reinvested dividends. Past performance does not predict future results; nothing here is investment advice.

Built by QuantCommons' quantitative engine, this page is about relative opportunity, not data on CTA-PB alone. It places CTA-PB (EIDP, Inc. USD 4.50 Cum Pfd Registered Shs) against 15 popular alternatives, its neighboring categories and the entire market of over 10,000 U.S.-listed stocks and ETFs, and surfaces what has done better on consistent outperformance, return for the risk taken, behavior in real market crashes and diversification. The result is a clearer view of where CTA-PB stands in the market, and of the alternatives worth a closer look.

Period covered: CTA-PB's full trading record, from October 1986 through September 2026. All returns include reinvested dividends. Data as of October 20, 2026.

## Key findings

- **Right now:** Over the past 6 months, CTA-PB fell 13.7% while the S&P 500 rose 9.1%. CTA-PB is 34.9% below its high, bear-market territory, while the S&P 500 sits 1.3% below a record.
- **Stock or market?:** The weakness is CTA-PB's own: it fell 12.6% over the past 3 months while the chemicals ETF MOO (VanEck Agribusiness ETF) fell 1.1%. The S&P 500 rose 3.9%. Its chemical peers did not move as one over the past 3 months: NTR (Nutrien) rose 4.4%, while CTVA (Corteva) fell 85.1%.
- **Past 1 to 3 years:** CTA-PB has gone against the market, falling 11.4% over the past year while the S&P 500 rose 15.8%. The same gap shows up over 3 years (4.9% against 89.3%). CTA-PB led its chemical peers in 2023, then fell behind CTA-PA (EIDP) and NTR (Nutrien) in 2025.
- **Long term:** CTA-PB turned $10,000 into $8,630 over the past decade, against $42,100 in the S&P 500. CTA-PB's 10-year loss of 13.7% puts it behind 85% of the stocks worth at least $300 million with that much history. The S&P 500 returned 321%.
- **In a crash:** Across seven sell-offs, CTA-PB has typically lost about 42% as much as the S&P 500. In the 2022 bear market, CTA-PB held up better than its chemical peers, including CTA-PA (EIDP), NTR and CF.
- **Diversification:** Against the S&P 500, CTA-PB has a correlation of 0.13 over 5 years, less closely than 93% of stocks worth at least $300 million. Next to an index fund it is a real diversifier. That said, over 10 years, CTA-PB's beta versus the S&P 500 was 0.26: 19% of the S&P 500's gains in rising months and 42% of its losses in falling ones.
- **Better options**
  - **Popular alternatives:** PFF (iShares Preferred and Income Securities ETF) and PGX (Invesco Preferred ETF) earned more than CTA-PB with less volatility over the past 5 years. PFF returned a loss of 0.2% a year at 10.5% volatility, against a loss of 7.6% a year at 26.4%.
  - **Nearby categories and themes:** LIN (Linde, chemicals) and GGG (Graco, industrial machinery) earned more than CTA-PB with less volatility over the past 5 years. LIN returned 11.5% a year at 20.9% volatility, against a loss of 7.6% a year at 26.4%.
  - **Whole market:** 1,206 of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than CTA-PB with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them VTI (Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF), VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) and BRK-B (Berkshire Hathaway).

## How much would $10,000 in CTA-PB have grown?

This chart tracks a hypothetical $10,000 investment in CTA-PB over the past 29 years, with dividends reinvested, alongside the same amount in the S&P 500, investments that ended ahead of CTA-PB over the same span and CTA-PB's popular alternatives, among those that traded for the entire period.

- $10,000 invested in CTA-PB at the end of September 1997 would have grown to $34,331 by September 2026, less than the $132,907 it would have become in SPY, an S&P 500 fund.
- Five of the eight other investments on the chart ended ahead of CTA-PB, and DE finished highest, at $436,954.

## CTA-PB at a glance

This section summarizes the key facts about the stock, its returns over periods from one to ten years and the risk it has carried, with dividends reinvested throughout.

- CTA-PB is still 34.9% below its all-time high.
- CTA-PB's deepest decline since it began trading in 1986 was 39.9%, from July 2022 to October 2023. It has not yet climbed back to that peak.
- Over 29 full calendar years, CTA-PB's best was 2009, when it returned 28.5%, and its worst was 2022, when it lost 25.0%. It lost money in ten of those years.

- Type: Stock, Materials (Agricultural Inputs)
- Trading since: October 17, 1986
- Market value: $49B
- Volatility (5 years): 26.4%; Sharpe ratio: -0.17
- Worst decline ever: −39.9%, from July 29, 2022 to October 26, 2023; not yet back at its high

| Period | CTA-PB total return |
| --- | --- |
| 1 month | −11.8% |
| 3 months | −12.6% |
| 6 months | −13.7% |
| year to date | −10.9% |
| 1 year | −11.4% |
| 3 years | +4.9% |
| 5 years | −32.6% |
| 10 years | −13.7% |

## CTA-PB against the whole market

Where CTA-PB ranks among every stock and fund, and what across the market has done better.

### How does CTA-PB rank among all stocks?

This section ranks CTA-PB on return, volatility, risk-adjusted return and worst decline against every stock worth at least $300 million with enough history.

- CTA-PB's worst decline of the past 10 years ranks in the top 7% of the 2,187 stocks worth at least $300 million, where the top fell the least.
- On return for the risk taken (the Sharpe ratio), CTA-PB ranks in the bottom 8% of the 2,893 stocks worth at least $300 million.

| Measure | CTA-PB | Rank |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1-year return | −11.4% | 2,387 of 3,287 (top 73%) |
| 3-year return | +4.9% | 2,251 of 3,017 (top 75%) |
| 5-year return | −32.6% | 2,195 of 2,893 (top 76%) |
| 10-year return | −13.7% | 1,882 of 2,202 (top 86%) |
| Volatility, 5 years | 26.4% | 434 of 2,893 (top 16%) |
| Sharpe ratio, 5 years | -0.17 | 2,649 of 2,893 (top 92%) |
| Worst decline, past 10 years | −39.9% | 153 of 2,187 (top 7%) |

### What has beaten CTA-PB on both return and risk?

Each dot is an investment, placed by how much it earned a year over the past 5 years (higher is better) and how much its price swung, its volatility (further left is calmer).

- 309 stocks and 897 ETFs worth at least $500 million sit in the green region: each earned more than CTA-PB over the past 5 years with smaller price swings. That is 33% of the 3,633 screened.
- Among those with at least half CTA-PB's swings, CAH has the best return for its risk: 42.1% a year at 24.7% volatility, 6% less than CTA-PB's 26.4%, and a Sharpe ratio (return above cash per unit of volatility) of 1.55 against -0.17 for CTA-PB.
- Among CTA-PB's popular alternatives, PFF and PGX are in the region. PFF earned a loss of 0.2% a year against a loss of 7.6% a year for CTA-PB, at 10.5% volatility, 60% less than CTA-PB's 26.4%.

### Is there a better investment than CTA-PB?

The table below lists investments that beat CTA-PB over the past 5 years on at least one of these measures: a higher annual return with lower volatility, a higher annual return at similar volatility, a similar return with lower volatility, a higher Sharpe ratio with a smaller worst decline, a higher total return in most periods from 3 months to 10 years, or smaller losses in recent market crashes.

- Among CTA-PB's popular alternatives, PFF and PGX earned more than CTA-PB with less volatility over the past 5 years. PFF returned a loss of 0.2% a year at 10.5% volatility, against a loss of 7.6% a year at 26.4%.
- Looking beyond its popular alternatives, LIN (chemicals) and GGG (industrial machinery) earned more than CTA-PB with less volatility over the past 5 years. LIN returned 11.5% a year at 20.9% volatility, against a loss of 7.6% a year at 26.4%.
- Across the whole market, 1,206 of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than CTA-PB with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them VTI, VOO and BRK-B.

The 15 strongest of 1,206 investments that beat CTA-PB over the past 5 years, out of 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million.

| Investment | Group | Annual return (5 years) | Volatility | Sharpe | Worst decline (10 years) | 10Y return | Correlation with CTA-PB | Better on |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| CTA-PB: EIDP, Inc. USD 4.50 Cum Pfd Registered Shs (this page) |  | −7.6% | 26.4% | -0.17 | −39.9% | −13.7% |  |  |
| [BIL](https://easycompare.io/research/bil): State Street SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF | Treasury Bonds | +3.7% | 0.3% | 14.05 | −0.2% | +25.8% | 0.02 | Higher return, lower volatility; Higher Sharpe, smaller worst decline; Higher return in most periods; Smaller losses in recent crashes |
| [BND](https://easycompare.io/research/bnd): Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF | Investment Grade Bonds | −0.4% | 6.1% | -0.03 | −18.6% | +13.2% | 0.32 | Higher return, lower volatility; Higher Sharpe, smaller worst decline; Higher return in most periods; Smaller losses in recent crashes |
| [VTIP](https://easycompare.io/research/vtip): Vanguard Short-Term Inflation-Protected Securities ETF | Treasury Bonds | +2.7% | 2.9% | 0.94 | −6.3% | +32.7% | 0.11 | Higher return, lower volatility; Higher Sharpe, smaller worst decline; Higher return in most periods; Smaller losses in recent crashes |
| FLOT: iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF | Floating Rate Bonds | +4.5% | 1.8% | 2.48 | −13.5% | +35.9% | -0.17 | Higher return, lower volatility; Higher Sharpe, smaller worst decline; Higher return in most periods; Smaller losses in recent crashes |
| [BSV](https://easycompare.io/research/bsv): Vanguard Short-Term Bond ETF | Short-Term Bonds | +1.7% | 2.8% | 0.63 | −8.5% | +20.5% | 0.25 | Higher return, lower volatility; Higher Sharpe, smaller worst decline; Higher return in most periods; Smaller losses in recent crashes |
| [BNDX](https://easycompare.io/research/bndx): Vanguard Total International Bond ETF | International Bonds | +0.2% | 4.9% | 0.06 | −16.2% | +15.0% | 0.22 | Higher return, lower volatility; Higher Sharpe, smaller worst decline; Higher return in most periods; Smaller losses in recent crashes |
| JAAA: Janus Henderson AAA CLO ETF | CLO Bonds | +5.1% | 1.7% | 2.98 | −2.6% | — | -0.01 | Higher return, lower volatility; Higher Sharpe, smaller worst decline; Higher return in most periods |
| SHY: iShares 1-3 Year Treasury Bond ETF | Treasury Bonds | +1.8% | 2.0% | 0.89 | −5.7% | +17.7% | 0.24 | Higher return, lower volatility; Higher Sharpe, smaller worst decline; Higher return in most periods; Smaller losses in recent crashes |
| SPSB: State Street SPDR Portfolio Short Term Corporate Bond ETF | Investment Grade Bonds | +2.8% | 2.0% | 1.38 | −11.8% | +29.2% | 0.23 | Higher return, lower volatility; Higher Sharpe, smaller worst decline; Higher return in most periods; Smaller losses in recent crashes |
| FLTR: VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF | Multi-Asset | +4.8% | 2.1% | 2.20 | −17.8% | +41.8% | -0.07 | Higher return, lower volatility; Higher Sharpe, smaller worst decline; Higher return in most periods; Smaller losses in recent crashes |
| FLRN: State Street SPDR Bloomberg Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF | Bonds | +4.5% | 1.7% | 2.58 | −14.7% | +35.9% | -0.13 | Higher return, lower volatility; Higher Sharpe, smaller worst decline; Higher return in most periods; Smaller losses in recent crashes |
| [MUB](https://easycompare.io/research/mub): iShares National Muni Bond ETF | Municipal Bonds | +0.3% | 4.2% | 0.09 | −13.7% | +17.8% | 0.25 | Higher return, lower volatility; Higher Sharpe, smaller worst decline; Higher return in most periods; Smaller losses in recent crashes |
| [VOO](https://easycompare.io/research/voo): Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | US Large-Cap Equity | +12.8% | 16.9% | 0.80 | −34.0% | +324% | 0.13 | Higher return, lower volatility; Higher Sharpe, smaller worst decline; Higher return in most periods |
| LMBS: First Trust Low Duration Opportunities ETF | Mortgage-Backed Securities | +3.0% | 2.6% | 1.14 | −6.5% | +25.6% | 0.32 | Higher return, lower volatility; Higher Sharpe, smaller worst decline; Higher return in most periods; Smaller losses in recent crashes |
| [WMT](https://easycompare.io/research/wmt): Walmart Inc. | Discount Retail | +20.8% | 22.6% | 0.96 | −25.7% | +508% | 0.00 | Higher return, lower volatility; Higher Sharpe, smaller worst decline; Higher return in most periods |

## CTA-PB against its popular alternatives

The investments people most often weigh against CTA-PB, compared period by period and year by year.

### How do CTA-PB's risk and return compare with its alternatives?

This map plots each investment's annual return over the past 5 years against its volatility, the size of its typical price swings.

- Only PFF and PGX were both more rewarding and calmer than CTA-PB over the past 5 years, earning a higher annual return with lower volatility.
- Over the past 5 years, CTA-PB returned -7.6% a year, less than the S&P 500's 12.7%, with higher volatility (26.4% against 17.1%).

### Has CTA-PB consistently beaten its popular alternatives?

This section compares CTA-PB with the investments people most often weigh against it, checking each one over eight periods from one month to ten years.

- 11 of the 15 popular alternatives, led by DE, UAN and CF, outperformed CTA-PB in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes.
- DE, UAN and CF outperformed CTA-PB in every long-term period and in all but one short-term period, the most consistent record in the group.
- DE, PFF and PGX earned more for the risk they took than CTA-PB (a higher Sharpe ratio) and fell less in their worst decline of the past 10 years.

| Investment | 1Y return | 3Y return | 5Y return | 10Y return | Periods ahead of CTA-PB | Verdict | Sharpe |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| CTA-PB: EIDP, Inc. USD 4.50 Cum Pfd Registered Shs (this page) | −11.4% | +4.9% | −32.6% | −13.7% |  |  | -0.17 |
| [DE](https://easycompare.io/research/de): Deere & Company | +38.3% | +75.4% | +96.1% | +755% | 5/5 short-term, 3/3 long-term | all-weather | 0.60 |
| UAN: CVR Partners, LP | +57.8% | +118% | +245% | +528% | 5/5 short-term, 3/3 long-term | all-weather | 0.82 |
| CF: CF Industries Holdings, Inc. | +43.4% | +52.2% | +117% | +516% | 5/5 short-term, 3/3 long-term | all-weather | 0.60 |
| [ADM](https://easycompare.io/research/adm): Archer-Daniels-Midland Company | +31.1% | +22.1% | +42.9% | +156% | 5/5 short-term, 3/3 long-term | all-weather | 0.40 |
| PFF: iShares Preferred and Income Securities ETF | −3.8% | +21.6% | −0.9% | +29.6% | 5/5 short-term, 3/3 long-term | all-weather | 0.04 |
| PGX: Invesco Preferred ETF | −8.7% | +16.0% | −11.0% | +16.8% | 5/5 short-term, 3/3 long-term | all-weather | -0.15 |
| LXU: LSB Industries, Inc. | +20.8% | +11.6% | +12.3% | +92.9% | 4/5 short-term, 3/3 long-term | all-weather | 0.32 |
| BG: Bunge Global S.A. | +8.6% | +10.6% | +34.5% | +131% | 3/5 short-term, 3/3 long-term | consistent | 0.35 |
| ICL: ICL Group Ltd | −19.2% | +8.2% | −23.4% | +102% | 3/5 short-term, 3/3 long-term | consistent | 0.04 |
| NTR: Nutrien Ltd. | +23.9% | +30.4% | +13.9% | — | 5/5 short-term, 2/3 long-term | consistent | 0.25 |
| SMG: The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company | +7.1% | +36.6% | −54.1% | −12.3% | 3/5 short-term, 2/3 long-term | consistent | -0.10 |
| MOS: The Mosaic Company | −37.4% | −44.6% | −52.3% | −12.6% | 0/5 short-term, 1/3 long-term |  | -0.14 |
| [CTA-PA](https://easycompare.io/research/cta-pa): EIDP, Inc. | −10.0% | −0.2% | −34.4% | −19.5% | 4/5 short-term, 0/3 long-term |  | -0.32 |
| CTVA: Corteva, Inc. | −79.0% | −73.5% | −69.2% | — | 1/5 short-term, 0/3 long-term |  | 0.04 |
| FMC: FMC Corporation | −81.5% | −91.1% | −93.3% | −83.8% | 0/5 short-term, 0/3 long-term |  | -0.76 |

### How did CTA-PB do year by year?

This table shows each investment's total return in every full calendar year since 1997, along with where CTA-PB ranked among its popular alternatives each year.

- CTA-PB finished ahead of the S&P 500 in seven of its 29 full calendar years, and behind it in each of the last 11.
- Among its popular alternatives, CTVA came out ahead of CTA-PB most often, in five of the six years both traded.
- Ranked against its popular alternatives each year, CTA-PB finished in the top quarter in seven of 29 years and in the bottom quarter in seven. In 2025, it ranked 12 of 16.

| Year | CTA-PB | SPY |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2025 | +2.0% | +17.7% |
| 2024 | +8.6% | +24.9% |
| 2023 | −5.9% | +26.2% |
| 2022 | −25.0% | −18.2% |
| 2021 | −2.3% | +28.7% |
| 2020 | +9.1% | +18.3% |
| 2019 | +18.6% | +31.2% |
| 2018 | −7.1% | −4.6% |
| 2017 | +11.8% | +21.7% |
| 2016 | +6.8% | +12.0% |

## Risk and diversification

How CTA-PB has fallen, how it held up in crashes beside the S&P 500 and its popular alternatives, and what moves independently of it.

### What were CTA-PB's worst declines?

A drawdown is the decline from a peak to the lowest point before a new high.

- In all four of CTA-PB's worst declines, the S&P 500 held up better over the same dates.
- Not every decline was the market's doing: CTA-PB fell 39.9% from July 2022 to October 2023, while the S&P 500 rose 2.1%.
- The slowest recovery came after CTA-PB fell 24.7% from March 1987 to April 1989; it did not regain that peak until April 1991, two years later.

| Decline | Peak | Low | Back at the high | SPY over the same dates | Market event |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| −39.9% | July 29, 2022 | October 26, 2023 | not yet | +2.1% | 2022 bear market |
| −31.4% | January 9, 2020 | March 23, 2020 | November 18, 2020 | −31.3% | Covid crash |
| −24.7% | March 26, 1987 | April 4, 1989 | April 24, 1991 | — |  |
| −24.2% | November 5, 2021 | May 17, 2022 | July 1, 2022 | −12.3% | 2022 bear market |
| −23.7% | September 2, 1998 | March 13, 2000 | October 5, 2001 | +42.0% | dot-com bust |

### How did CTA-PB do in stock market crashes?

This section measures how far CTA-PB, the S&P 500 and each alternative fell from peak to trough during every major market crash since 2000.

- CTA-PB fell less than the S&P 500 in eight of the ten crashes it has traded through. The clearest case was the dot-com bust, when CTA-PB fell 7.0% and the S&P 500 fell 47.5%.
- None of its popular alternatives fell less than CTA-PB in most of the crashes they both traded through.

| Crash | Dates | CTA-PB fall | SPY fall |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Dot-com bust | March 10, 2000 to October 9, 2002 | −7.0% | −47.5% |
| Global financial crisis | October 9, 2007 to March 9, 2009 | −15.7% | −55.2% |
| Flash crash | May 6, 2010 to May 7, 2010 | −1.7% | −1.5% |
| Euro debt crisis | July 22, 2011 to October 3, 2011 | −6.1% | −17.9% |
| China devaluation & oil rout | August 10, 2015 to February 11, 2016 | −3.5% | −12.8% |
| Volmageddon | February 2, 2018 to February 9, 2018 | −2.5% | −6.5% |
| Q4 2018 selloff | September 21, 2018 to December 24, 2018 | −5.5% | −19.3% |
| COVID crash | February 19, 2020 to March 23, 2020 | −26.9% | −33.7% |
| 2022 bear market | January 4, 2022 to October 12, 2022 | −19.2% | −24.5% |
| SVB / regional bank stress | March 8, 2023 to March 13, 2023 | −4.4% | −3.4% |

### How closely does CTA-PB move with the S&P 500?

Upside capture measures how much of the S&P 500's gains an investment kept in the months the market rose, and downside capture how much of its losses it took in the months the market fell.

- Over the past 10 years, CTA-PB captured 19% of the S&P 500's gains in rising months and 42% of its losses in falling months, with a beta of 0.26. Its share of the market's losses was larger than its share of the gains.
- 11 of the 13 popular alternatives had a higher capture ratio (upside capture divided by downside capture) than CTA-PB's 0.44, led by DE, CF and UAN.

Measured over the past 10 years of monthly returns against SPY.

| Investment | Upside capture | Downside capture | Beta |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| CTA-PB: EIDP, Inc. USD 4.50 Cum Pfd Registered Shs (this page) | 19.0% | 42.0% | 0.26 |
| [DE](https://easycompare.io/research/de): Deere & Company | 110% | 66.0% | 0.98 |
| UAN: CVR Partners, LP | 114% | 103% | 1.03 |
| CF: CF Industries Holdings, Inc. | 102% | 78.0% | 0.82 |
| [ADM](https://easycompare.io/research/adm): Archer-Daniels-Midland Company | 72.0% | 79.0% | 0.75 |
| PFF: iShares Preferred and Income Securities ETF | 39.0% | 59.0% | 0.50 |
| PGX: Invesco Preferred ETF | 35.0% | 58.0% | 0.45 |
| LXU: LSB Industries, Inc. | 111% | 187% | 1.31 |
| BG: Bunge Global S.A. | 67.0% | 72.0% | 0.66 |
| ICL: ICL Group Ltd | 88.0% | 126% | 1.10 |
| SMG: The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company | 90.0% | 185% | 1.52 |
| MOS: The Mosaic Company | 82.0% | 154% | 1.32 |
| [CTA-PA](https://easycompare.io/research/cta-pa): EIDP, Inc. | 19.0% | 51.0% | 0.23 |
| FMC: FMC Corporation | 35.0% | 157% | 0.71 |

### What diversifies CTA-PB?

Correlation measures how closely two investments move together, on a scale from 1 (in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to -1 (in opposite directions).

- Moving a fifth of the money in CTA-PB into MCK would have cut the portfolio's volatility by 21% over the past 5 years and raised its annual return (-6.4% for CTA-PB alone, +1.7% for the mix).
- FIX made money in eight of the ten calendar years in which CTA-PB lost money.
- Among large ETFs, LVHI, DXJ and EMLP have moved largely independently of CTA-PB over the past 5 years, with correlations of 0.08 or lower, and each still earned a positive 5-year return.

| Investment | Correlation with CTA-PB | 5Y return | Volatility | Sharpe | Rose in CTA-PB's 10 down years |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| LVHI: Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 0.08 | +119% | 11.1% | 1.48 | 3 of 10 |
| DXJ: WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund | 0.08 | +225% | 19.1% | 1.34 | 5 of 10 |
| EMLP: First Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund | 0.01 | +101% | 14.5% | 1.04 | 4 of 10 |
| HDV: iShares Core High Dividend ETF | 0.01 | +83.3% | 13.0% | 1.00 | 4 of 10 |
| [SMH](https://easycompare.io/research/smh): VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.11 | +323% | 36.9% | 0.97 | 5 of 10 |
| DBEF: Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF | 0.19 | +85.0% | 13.8% | 0.96 | 4 of 10 |
| [GLD](https://easycompare.io/research/gld): SPDR Gold Shares | 0.11 | +126% | 18.9% | 0.96 | 4 of 10 |
| SPMO: Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 0.04 | +136% | 20.8% | 0.93 | 2 of 10 |

## Common questions

### What was CTA-PB's worst drawdown?

CTA-PB's deepest decline since it began trading in 1986 was 39.9%, from July 2022 to October 2023. It has not yet climbed back to that peak.

### What were CTA-PB's best and worst years?

Over 29 full calendar years, CTA-PB's best year was 2009, when it returned 28.5%. Its worst was 2022, with a return of -25.0%.

### Is there a better investment than CTA-PB?

Among CTA-PB's popular alternatives, PFF and PGX earned more than CTA-PB with less volatility over the past 5 years. PFF returned a loss of 0.2% a year at 10.5% volatility, against a loss of 7.6% a year at 26.4%. Looking beyond its popular alternatives, LIN (chemicals) and GGG (industrial machinery) earned more than CTA-PB with less volatility over the past 5 years. LIN returned 11.5% a year at 20.9% volatility, against a loss of 7.6% a year at 26.4%.

### Is CTA-PB more volatile than the S&P 500?

Yes. CTA-PB's volatility over the past 5 years was 26.4%, 1.5 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, CTA-PB's return lands within 26.4% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump.

### What is CTA-PB's Sharpe ratio?

CTA-PB's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was -0.17, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so CTA-PB earned less for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings.

### How correlated is CTA-PB with the S&P 500?

Over the past 5 years, CTA-PB's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.13 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They are only loosely linked, which makes it a real diversifier next to an index fund. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against CTA-PB instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a CTA-PB holding.

### What are the best alternatives to CTA-PB?

Of the 15 popular alternatives we compared, 11 outperformed CTA-PB in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes, with dividends reinvested: DE, UAN and CF.

### Did CTA-PB outperform the S&P 500?

CTA-PB finished ahead of the S&P 500 (SPY) in seven of 29 full calendar years. In 2025, it returned +2.0%, against +17.7% for the index.

### How did CTA-PB do in stock market crashes?

CTA-PB fell less than the S&P 500 (SPY) in eight of the ten major crashes it has traded through, and further in one. The clearest case was the dot-com bust, when CTA-PB fell 7.0% and the S&P 500 fell 47.5%.

### What diversifies CTA-PB?

These had a low correlation with CTA-PB over the past 5 years and still earned a positive 5-year return: among large ETFs, LVHI (correlation 0.08), DXJ (correlation 0.08) and EMLP (correlation 0.01); among large stocks, CAH (correlation -0.10), CLS (correlation -0.07) and FIX (correlation 0.01). A correlation near zero means the two have moved largely independently.

## More research

- [Deere & Company (DE) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/de)
- [Archer-Daniels-Midland (ADM) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/adm)
- [EIDP (CTA-PA) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/cta-pa)
- [Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/schd)
- [NVIDIA (NVDA) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/nvda)
- [Apple (AAPL) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/aapl)
- [Alphabet (GOOG) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/goog)
- [Microsoft (MSFT) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/msft)
- [Amazon.com (AMZN) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/amzn)
- [Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/vti)
- [Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing (TSM) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/tsm)
- [Space Exploration Technologies (SPCX) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/spcx)

## Explore further

- Full page with charts: https://easycompare.io/research/cta-pb
- All research pages: https://easycompare.io/llms.txt
- Compare the entire market against CTA-PB live: https://betterthanspy.com/?b=CTA-PB&utm_source=easycompare&utm_medium=research