# How CSX compares with the whole market and its popular alternatives

> Source: EasyCompare research, https://easycompare.io/research/csx
> Data as of October 20, 2026. Total returns include reinvested dividends. Past performance does not predict future results; nothing here is investment advice.

Built by QuantCommons' quantitative engine, this page is about relative opportunity, not data on CSX alone. It places CSX (CSX Corporation) against 9 popular alternatives, its neighboring categories and the entire market of over 10,000 U.S.-listed stocks and ETFs, and surfaces what has done better on consistent outperformance, return for the risk taken, behavior in real market crashes and diversification. The result is a clearer view of where CSX stands in the market, and of the alternatives worth a closer look.

Period covered: CSX's full trading record, from October 1986 through September 2026. All returns include reinvested dividends. Data as of October 20, 2026.

## Key findings

- **Right now:** Over the past 3 months, CSX fell 3.8% while the S&P 500 rose 3.9%.
- **Stock or market?:** CSX fell 3.8% over the past 3 months, 5.5 points ahead of the railroads ETF IYT (iShares U.S. Transportation ETF), which fell 9.3%. The S&P 500 rose 3.9%. CSX rose 4.5% last month as the S&P 500 fell 0.6% and the Nasdaq 100 fell 3.2%.
- **Past 1 to 3 years:** CSX has run far ahead of the market, rising 32.8% over the past year against 15.8% for the S&P 500 and 17.9% for the Nasdaq 100. Even so, it finished behind the S&P 500 in both 2024 and 2025.
- **Long term:** CSX turned $10,000 into $54,600 over the past decade, against $42,100 in the S&P 500. Even so, the past 5 years only trailed the S&P 500 (49.3% against 81.7%), after a much stronger decade (446% against 321%).
- **In a crash:** Across seven sell-offs, CSX has typically fallen 1.3 times as far as the S&P 500. In the 2022 bear market, CSX fell harder than most of its railroad peers, including CP (Canadian Pacific Kansas City), CNI and NSC.
- **Diversification:** Against the S&P 500, CSX has a correlation of 0.73 over 5 years, more closely than 99% of stocks worth at least $300 million. Next to an index fund it is more of the same, not a cushion. When the S&P 500 had a down month, CSX usually fell with it (19 of 22 months).
- **Better options**
  - **Popular alternatives:** WAB (Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies) was ahead of CSX in most short and long periods.
  - **Nearby categories and themes:** CB (Chubb, property & casualty insurance) and BRK-B (Berkshire Hathaway, insurance) earned more than CSX with less volatility over the past 5 years. CB returned 15.7% a year at 20.4% volatility, against 8.3% a year at 23.3%.
  - **Versus the S&P 500:** Simply owning the S&P 500 would have done better over the past 5 years: 12.7% a year at 17.1% volatility, against 8.3% at 23.3% for CSX.

## How much would $10,000 in CSX have grown?

This chart tracks a hypothetical $10,000 investment in CSX over the past 29 years, with dividends reinvested, alongside the same amount in the S&P 500, investments that ended ahead of CSX over the same span and CSX's popular alternatives, among those that traded for the entire period.

- $10,000 invested in CSX at the end of September 1997 would have grown to $247,386 by September 2026, more than the $132,907 it would have become in SPY, an S&P 500 fund.
- Six of the eight other investments on the chart ended ahead of CSX, and ODFL finished highest, at $2,149,322.

## CSX at a glance

This section summarizes the key facts about the stock, its returns over periods from one to ten years and the risk it has carried, with dividends reinvested throughout.

- CSX's deepest decline since it began trading in 1986 was 69.2%, from May 2008 to March 2009. It took 22 months from the low to climb back to its old high.
- Over 29 full calendar years, CSX's best was 2017, when it returned 55.5%, and its worst was 2015, when it lost 26.7%. It lost money in ten of those years.
- CSX is 9.4% below its all-time high.

- Type: Stock, Industrials (Railroads)
- Trading since: October 17, 1986
- Market value: $89B
- Volatility (5 years): 23.3%; Sharpe ratio: 0.46
- Worst decline ever: −69.2%, from May 29, 2008 to March 9, 2009; back at its high by January 3, 2011

| Period | CSX total return |
| --- | --- |
| 1 month | +4.5% |
| 3 months | −3.8% |
| 6 months | +10.6% |
| year to date | +33.7% |
| 1 year | +32.8% |
| 3 years | +63.0% |
| 5 years | +49.3% |
| 10 years | +446% |

## CSX against the whole market

Where CSX ranks among every stock and fund, and what across the market has done better.

### How does CSX rank among all stocks?

This section ranks CSX on return, volatility, risk-adjusted return and worst decline against every stock worth at least $300 million with enough history.

- CSX's worst decline of the past 10 years ranks in the top 7% of the 2,187 stocks worth at least $300 million, where the top fell the least.

| Measure | CSX | Rank |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1-year return | +32.8% | 899 of 3,287 (top 28%) |
| 3-year return | +63.0% | 1,358 of 3,017 (top 46%) |
| 5-year return | +49.3% | 1,101 of 2,893 (top 39%) |
| 10-year return | +446% | 353 of 2,202 (top 17%) |
| Volatility, 5 years | 23.3% | 224 of 2,893 (top 8%) |
| Sharpe ratio, 5 years | 0.46 | 1,040 of 2,893 (top 36%) |
| Worst decline, past 10 years | −40.5% | 164 of 2,187 (top 8%) |

### What has beaten CSX on both return and risk?

Each dot is an investment, placed by how much it earned a year over the past 5 years (higher is better) and how much its price swung, its volatility (further left is calmer).

- 45 stocks and 326 ETFs worth at least $500 million sit in the green region: each earned more than CSX over the past 5 years with smaller price swings. That is 10% of the 3,633 screened.
- Among those with at least half CSX's swings, DXJ has the best return for its risk: 26.6% a year at 19.1% volatility, 18% less than CSX's 23.3%, and a Sharpe ratio (return above cash per unit of volatility) of 1.34 against 0.46 for CSX.
- None of CSX's popular alternatives made it, but AFL (life insurance) did: 19.0% a year at 20.8% volatility, 11% less than CSX's 23.3%.

### Is there a better investment than CSX?

The table below lists investments that beat CSX over the past 5 years on at least one of these measures: a higher annual return with lower volatility, a higher annual return at similar volatility, a similar return with lower volatility, a higher Sharpe ratio with a smaller worst decline, a higher total return in most periods from 3 months to 10 years, or smaller losses in recent market crashes.

- Among CSX's popular alternatives, WAB was ahead of CSX in most short and long periods.
- Looking beyond its popular alternatives, CB (property & casualty insurance) and BRK-B (insurance) earned more than CSX with less volatility over the past 5 years. CB returned 15.7% a year at 20.4% volatility, against 8.3% a year at 23.3%.
- Simply owning the S&P 500 would have done better over the past 5 years: 12.7% a year at 17.1% volatility, against 8.3% at 23.3% for CSX.

The 15 strongest of 371 investments that beat CSX over the past 5 years, out of 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million.

| Investment | Group | Annual return (5 years) | Volatility | Sharpe | Worst decline (10 years) | 10Y return | Correlation with CSX | Better on |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| CSX: CSX Corporation (this page) |  | +8.3% | 23.3% | 0.46 | −40.5% | +446% |  |  |
| [RSG](https://easycompare.io/research/rsg): Republic Services, Inc. | Environmental Services | +13.9% | 18.5% | 0.80 | −34.0% | +446% | 0.46 | Higher return, lower volatility; Higher Sharpe, smaller worst decline; Higher return in most periods; Smaller losses in recent crashes |
| [JNJ](https://easycompare.io/research/jnj): Johnson & Johnson | Pharmaceuticals | +12.7% | 17.9% | 0.76 | −27.4% | +196% | 0.35 | Higher return, lower volatility; Higher Sharpe, smaller worst decline; Higher return in most periods |
| [SCHD](https://easycompare.io/research/schd): Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | US Dividend Equity | +9.7% | 14.3% | 0.72 | −33.4% | +252% | 0.65 | Higher return, lower volatility; Higher Sharpe, smaller worst decline; Higher return in most periods |
| SPMO: Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | US Momentum Equity | +18.7% | 20.8% | 0.93 | −30.9% | +499% | 0.59 | Higher return, lower volatility; Higher Sharpe, smaller worst decline; Higher return in most periods |
| MGV: Vanguard Morningstar Mega Cap Value ETF | US Large-Cap Value | +12.6% | 13.4% | 0.95 | −35.4% | +244% | 0.72 | Higher return, lower volatility; Higher Sharpe, smaller worst decline; Higher return in most periods |
| [RY](https://easycompare.io/research/ry): Royal Bank of Canada | Banks | +17.3% | 18.2% | 0.97 | −40.0% | +352% | 0.42 | Higher return, lower volatility; Higher return in most periods |
| JQUA: JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF | US Quality Equity | +13.6% | 15.7% | 0.89 | −32.9% | — | 0.74 | Higher return, lower volatility; Higher Sharpe, smaller worst decline; Higher return in most periods |
| SPUS: SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF | Technology | +15.0% | 19.5% | 0.82 | −30.8% | — | 0.67 | Higher return, lower volatility; Higher Sharpe, smaller worst decline; Higher return in most periods |
| ILCV: iShares Morningstar Value ETF | Broad Market | +12.7% | 14.1% | 0.92 | −35.5% | +220% | 0.73 | Higher return, lower volatility; Higher Sharpe, smaller worst decline; Higher return in most periods |
| FTXH: First Trust Nasdaq Pharmaceuticals ETF | Healthcare | +11.9% | 16.9% | 0.75 | −32.1% | +153% | 0.44 | Higher return, lower volatility; Higher Sharpe, smaller worst decline; Higher return in most periods |
| HLAL: Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF | Broad Market | +14.0% | 18.0% | 0.82 | −33.6% | — | 0.66 | Higher return, lower volatility; Higher Sharpe, smaller worst decline; Higher return in most periods |
| IDHQ: Invesco S&P International Developed Quality ETF | International | +10.0% | 17.9% | 0.63 | −33.6% | +183% | 0.64 | Higher return, lower volatility; Higher Sharpe, smaller worst decline; Higher return in most periods |
| DXJ: WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund | International Equity | +26.6% | 19.1% | 1.34 | −39.1% | +428% | 0.46 | Higher return, lower volatility; Higher return in most periods |
| [KO](https://easycompare.io/research/ko): The Coca-Cola Company | Food & Beverages | +14.7% | 16.8% | 0.91 | −37.0% | +204% | 0.37 | Higher return, lower volatility; Higher return in most periods |
| NXTG: First Trust Indxx NextG ETF | Technology | +16.2% | 19.1% | 0.89 | −33.6% | +330% | 0.51 | Higher return, lower volatility; Higher Sharpe, smaller worst decline; Higher return in most periods |

## CSX against its popular alternatives

The investments people most often weigh against CSX, compared period by period and year by year.

### How do CSX's risk and return compare with its alternatives?

This map plots each investment's annual return over the past 5 years against its volatility, the size of its typical price swings.

- None of the nine popular alternatives earned more than CSX over the past 5 years with smaller price swings, so every higher return on the map came with a bumpier ride.
- Six of the nine popular alternatives earned less than CSX over the past 5 years while swinging more, the weaker corner of the map.
- Over the past 5 years, CSX returned 8.3% a year, less than the S&P 500's 12.7%, with higher volatility (23.3% against 17.1%).

### Has CSX consistently beaten its popular alternatives?

This section compares CSX with the investments people most often weigh against it, checking each one over eight periods from one month to ten years.

- None of the nine popular alternatives outperformed CSX in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes. The closest was WAB.

| Investment | 1Y return | 3Y return | 5Y return | 10Y return | Periods ahead of CSX | Verdict | Sharpe |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| CSX: CSX Corporation (this page) | +32.8% | +63.0% | +49.3% | +446% |  |  | 0.46 |
| [WAB](https://easycompare.io/research/wab): Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation | +45.3% | +189% | +212% | +264% | 2/5 short-term, 2/3 long-term |  | 1.00 |
| [ODFL](https://easycompare.io/research/odfl): Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc. | +34.7% | −2.5% | +23.4% | +747% | 2/5 short-term, 1/3 long-term |  | 0.30 |
| [NSC](https://easycompare.io/research/nsc): Norfolk Southern Corporation | +13.8% | +72.0% | +29.5% | +328% | 2/5 short-term, 1/3 long-term |  | 0.33 |
| [UNP](https://easycompare.io/research/unp): Union Pacific Corporation | +29.2% | +45.4% | +41.2% | +295% | 3/5 short-term, 0/3 long-term |  | 0.42 |
| JBHT: J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc. | +37.9% | +32.2% | +21.6% | +220% | 1/5 short-term, 0/3 long-term |  | 0.28 |
| [CP](https://easycompare.io/research/cp): Canadian Pacific Kansas City Ltd. | +15.1% | +25.6% | +21.6% | +227% | 0/5 short-term, 0/3 long-term |  | 0.28 |
| [CNI](https://easycompare.io/research/cni): Canadian National Railway Company | +30.2% | +21.9% | +3.1% | +124% | 0/5 short-term, 0/3 long-term |  | 0.14 |
| TRN: Trinity Industries, Inc. | −8.8% | +29.7% | +2.5% | +107% | 0/5 short-term, 0/3 long-term |  | 0.19 |
| GBX: The Greenbrier Companies, Inc. | −15.7% | −0.7% | −9.4% | +38.6% | 0/5 short-term, 0/3 long-term |  | 0.16 |

### How did CSX do year by year?

This table shows each investment's total return in every full calendar year since 1997, along with where CSX ranked among its popular alternatives each year.

- CSX finished ahead of the S&P 500 in 17 of its 29 full calendar years, and behind it in each of the last three.
- Ranked against its popular alternatives each year, CSX finished in the top quarter in nine of 29 years and in the bottom quarter in two. In 2025, it ranked 3 of 10.
- Among its popular alternatives, ODFL came out ahead of CSX most often, in 18 of the 29 years both traded.

| Year | CSX | SPY |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2025 | +14.2% | +17.7% |
| 2024 | −5.6% | +24.9% |
| 2023 | +13.5% | +26.2% |
| 2022 | −16.6% | −18.2% |
| 2021 | +25.7% | +28.7% |
| 2020 | +27.1% | +18.3% |
| 2019 | +18.0% | +31.2% |
| 2018 | +14.5% | −4.6% |
| 2017 | +55.5% | +21.7% |
| 2016 | +42.1% | +12.0% |

## Risk and diversification

How CSX has fallen, how it held up in crashes beside the S&P 500 and its popular alternatives, and what moves independently of it.

### What were CSX's worst declines?

A drawdown is the decline from a peak to the lowest point before a new high.

- In all four of CSX's worst declines, the S&P 500 held up better over the same dates.
- Not every decline was the market's doing: CSX fell 65.1% from July 1997 to June 2000, while the S&P 500 rose 60.9%.
- The slowest recovery came after CSX fell 65.1% from July 1997 to June 2000; it did not regain that peak until December 2005, six years later.

| Decline | Peak | Low | Back at the high | SPY over the same dates | Market event |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| −69.2% | May 29, 2008 | March 9, 2009 | January 3, 2011 | −50.4% | 2008 financial crisis |
| −65.1% | July 31, 1997 | June 21, 2000 | December 23, 2005 | +60.9% | dot-com bust |
| −44.4% | August 25, 1987 | October 26, 1987 | August 30, 1989 | — |  |
| −40.8% | November 26, 2014 | January 25, 2016 | December 1, 2016 | −7.2% | 2015 China and oil sell-off |
| −40.5% | February 20, 2020 | March 23, 2020 | September 15, 2020 | −33.4% | Covid crash |

### How did CSX do in stock market crashes?

This section measures how far CSX, the S&P 500 and each alternative fell from peak to trough during every major market crash since 2000.

- CSX fell further than the S&P 500 in eight of the ten crashes it has traded through. The clearest case was the 2008 financial crisis, when CSX fell 69.2% and the S&P 500 fell 55.2%.
- Among its popular alternatives, CNI held up best, falling less than CSX in eight of the ten crashes they both traded through.

| Crash | Dates | CSX fall | SPY fall |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Dot-com bust | March 10, 2000 to October 9, 2002 | −37.5% | −47.5% |
| Global financial crisis | October 9, 2007 to March 9, 2009 | −69.2% | −55.2% |
| Flash crash | May 6, 2010 to May 7, 2010 | −0.9% | −1.5% |
| Euro debt crisis | July 22, 2011 to October 3, 2011 | −27.4% | −17.9% |
| China devaluation & oil rout | August 10, 2015 to February 11, 2016 | −26.5% | −12.8% |
| Volmageddon | February 2, 2018 to February 9, 2018 | −8.7% | −6.5% |
| Q4 2018 selloff | September 21, 2018 to December 24, 2018 | −21.4% | −19.3% |
| COVID crash | February 19, 2020 to March 23, 2020 | −40.5% | −33.7% |
| 2022 bear market | January 4, 2022 to October 12, 2022 | −29.4% | −24.5% |
| SVB / regional bank stress | March 8, 2023 to March 13, 2023 | −4.0% | −3.4% |

### How closely does CSX move with the S&P 500?

Upside capture measures how much of the S&P 500's gains an investment kept in the months the market rose, and downside capture how much of its losses it took in the months the market fell.

- Only ODFL had a higher capture ratio (upside capture divided by downside capture) than CSX's 1.00, out of nine popular alternatives with the same record.
- ODFL took just 107% of the S&P 500's losses, against 117% for CSX, while still keeping 127% of its gains.
- Over the past 10 years, CSX captured 118% of the S&P 500's gains in rising months and 117% of its losses in falling months, with a beta of 1.19. It amplified the market's moves in both directions.

Measured over the past 10 years of monthly returns against SPY.

| Investment | Upside capture | Downside capture | Beta |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| CSX: CSX Corporation (this page) | 118% | 117% | 1.19 |
| [WAB](https://easycompare.io/research/wab): Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation | 111% | 127% | 1.28 |
| [ODFL](https://easycompare.io/research/odfl): Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc. | 127% | 107% | 1.10 |
| [NSC](https://easycompare.io/research/nsc): Norfolk Southern Corporation | 123% | 147% | 1.30 |
| [UNP](https://easycompare.io/research/unp): Union Pacific Corporation | 104% | 119% | 1.05 |
| JBHT: J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc. | 109% | 137% | 1.18 |
| [CP](https://easycompare.io/research/cp): Canadian Pacific Kansas City Ltd. | 96.0% | 113% | 1.00 |
| [CNI](https://easycompare.io/research/cni): Canadian National Railway Company | 80.0% | 105% | 0.89 |
| TRN: Trinity Industries, Inc. | 110% | 165% | 1.38 |
| GBX: The Greenbrier Companies, Inc. | 124% | 211% | 1.50 |

### What diversifies CSX?

Correlation measures how closely two investments move together, on a scale from 1 (in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to -1 (in opposite directions).

- Moving a fifth of the money in CSX into GLD would have cut the portfolio's volatility by 17% over the past 5 years and raised its annual return (+10.8% for CSX alone, +13.1% for the mix).
- Among large ETFs, DXJ, GCOW and SMH have moved largely independently of CSX over the past 5 years, with correlations of 0.49 or lower, and each still earned a positive 5-year return.
- CAH made money in seven of the ten calendar years in which CSX lost money.

| Investment | Correlation with CSX | 5Y return | Volatility | Sharpe | Rose in CSX's 10 down years |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| DXJ: WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund | 0.46 | +225% | 19.1% | 1.34 | 4 of 10 |
| GCOW: Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF | 0.46 | +93.4% | 13.6% | 1.04 | 2 of 10 |
| [SMH](https://easycompare.io/research/smh): VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.49 | +323% | 36.9% | 0.97 | 3 of 10 |
| [GLD](https://easycompare.io/research/gld): SPDR Gold Shares | 0.11 | +126% | 18.9% | 0.96 | 4 of 10 |
| [XLE](https://easycompare.io/research/xle): State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | 0.34 | +177% | 25.5% | 0.93 | 6 of 10 |
| EWT: iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF | 0.48 | +153% | 24.2% | 0.89 | 2 of 10 |
| EUFN: iShares MSCI Europe Financials ETF | 0.48 | +133% | 21.8% | 0.89 | 2 of 10 |
| AMLP: Alerian MLP ETF | 0.44 | +111% | 18.9% | 0.89 | 4 of 10 |

## Common questions

### What was CSX's worst drawdown?

CSX's deepest decline since it began trading in 1986 was 69.2%, from May 2008 to March 2009. It took 22 months from the low to climb back to its old high.

### What were CSX's best and worst years?

Over 29 full calendar years, CSX's best year was 2017, when it returned 55.5%. Its worst was 2015, with a return of -26.7%.

### Is there a better investment than CSX?

Among CSX's popular alternatives, WAB was ahead of CSX in most short and long periods. Looking beyond its popular alternatives, CB (property & casualty insurance) and BRK-B (insurance) earned more than CSX with less volatility over the past 5 years. CB returned 15.7% a year at 20.4% volatility, against 8.3% a year at 23.3%.

### Is CSX more volatile than the S&P 500?

Yes. CSX's volatility over the past 5 years was 23.3%, 1.4 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, CSX's return lands within 23.3% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump.

### What is CSX's Sharpe ratio?

CSX's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.46, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so CSX earned less for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings.

### How correlated is CSX with the S&P 500?

Over the past 5 years, CSX's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.73 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They often move together: some diversification next to an index fund, but not a cushion. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against CSX instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a CSX holding.

### What are the best alternatives to CSX?

None of the nine popular alternatives we compared outperformed CSX in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes, which says more about CSX's strength than about its alternatives.

### Did CSX outperform the S&P 500?

CSX finished ahead of the S&P 500 (SPY) in 17 of 29 full calendar years. In 2025, it returned +14.2%, against +17.7% for the index.

### How did CSX do in stock market crashes?

CSX fell less than the S&P 500 (SPY) in two of the ten major crashes it has traded through, and further in eight. The clearest case was the 2008 financial crisis, when CSX fell 69.2% and the S&P 500 fell 55.2%.

### What diversifies CSX?

These had a low correlation with CSX over the past 5 years and still earned a positive 5-year return: among large ETFs, DXJ (correlation 0.46), GCOW (correlation 0.46) and SMH (correlation 0.49); among large stocks, CAH (correlation 0.38), CLS (correlation 0.34) and MCK (correlation 0.38). A correlation near zero means the two have moved largely independently.

## More research

- [Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies (WAB) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/wab)
- [Old Dominion Freight Line (ODFL) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/odfl)
- [Norfolk Southern (NSC) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/nsc)
- [Union Pacific (UNP) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/unp)
- [Canadian Pacific Kansas City (CP) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/cp)
- [Canadian National Railway (CNI) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/cni)
- [Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/schd)
- [NVIDIA (NVDA) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/nvda)
- [Apple (AAPL) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/aapl)
- [Alphabet (GOOG) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/goog)
- [Microsoft (MSFT) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/msft)
- [Amazon.com (AMZN) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/amzn)

## Explore further

- Full page with charts: https://easycompare.io/research/csx
- All research pages: https://easycompare.io/llms.txt
- Compare the entire market against CSX live: https://betterthanspy.com/?b=CSX&utm_source=easycompare&utm_medium=research