# How Canadian Pacific Kansas City (CP) compares with the whole market and its popular alternatives

> Source: EasyCompare research, https://easycompare.io/research/cp
> Data as of October 20, 2026. Total returns include reinvested dividends. Past performance does not predict future results; nothing here is investment advice.

Built by QuantCommons' quantitative engine, this page is about relative opportunity, not data on CP alone. It places CP (Canadian Pacific Kansas City Ltd.) against 10 popular alternatives, its neighboring categories and the entire market of over 10,000 U.S.-listed stocks and ETFs, and surfaces what has done better on consistent outperformance, return for the risk taken, behavior in real market crashes and diversification. The result is a clearer view of where CP stands in the market, and of the alternatives worth a closer look.

Period covered: CP's full trading record, from October 1986 through September 2026. All returns include reinvested dividends. Data as of October 20, 2026.

## Key findings

- **Right now:** Over the past 3 months, CP fell 4.5% while the S&P 500 rose 3.9%.
- **Stock or market?:** CP fell 4.5% over the past 3 months, less than the 1.12 beta versus the S&P 500 would have implied (4.4%).
- **Past 1 to 3 years:** The last two calendar years both went the same way: CP rose 2.6% in 2025, against 15.8% for the S&P 500 and 17.9% for the Nasdaq 100.
- **Long term:** CP turned $10,000 into $32,700 over the past decade, against $42,100 in the S&P 500. That said, year by year, CP has outpaced the S&P 500 69% of the time since 1997.
- **In a crash:** Across seven sell-offs, CP has typically fallen 1.3 times as far as the S&P 500. That said, in the 2022 bear market, CP held up better than its railroad peers, including BRK-B (Berkshire Hathaway), UNP and CSX.
- **Diversification:** Against the S&P 500, CP has a correlation of 0.69 over 5 years, more closely than 98% of stocks worth at least $300 million. Next to an index fund it is more of the same, not a cushion. When the S&P 500 had a down month, CP usually fell with it (20 of 22 months).
- **Better options**
  - **Nearby categories and themes:** TRV (Travelers Companies, property & casualty insurance) and CB (Chubb, property & casualty insurance) earned more than CP with less volatility over the past 5 years. TRV returned 22.4% a year at 22.3% volatility, against 4.0% a year at 24.1%.
  - **Versus the S&P 500:** Simply owning the S&P 500 would have done better over the past 5 years: 12.7% a year at 17.1% volatility, against 4.0% at 24.1% for CP.
  - **Whole market:** 678 of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than CP with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them VTI (Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF), VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) and BRK-B (Berkshire Hathaway).

## How much would $10,000 in CP have grown?

This chart tracks a hypothetical $10,000 investment in CP over the past 29 years, with dividends reinvested, alongside the same amount in the S&P 500, investments that ended ahead of CP over the same span and CP's popular alternatives, among those that traded for the entire period.

- $10,000 invested in CP at the end of September 1997 would have grown to $436,454 by September 2026, more than the $132,907 it would have become in SPY, an S&P 500 fund.
- Five of the eight other investments on the chart ended ahead of CP, and JBHT finished highest, at $749,311.

## CP at a glance

This section summarizes the key facts about the stock, its returns over periods from one to ten years and the risk it has carried, with dividends reinvested throughout.

- CP's deepest decline since it began trading in 1986 was 69.1%, from July 2007 to March 2009. It took about three years from the low to climb back to its old high.
- Over 29 full calendar years, CP's best was 2009, when it returned 64.1%, and its worst was 2008, when it lost 47.1%. It lost money in five of those years.
- CP is 9.5% below its all-time high.

- Type: Stock, Industrials (Railroads)
- Trading since: October 17, 1986
- Market value: $77B
- Volatility (5 years): 24.1%; Sharpe ratio: 0.28
- Worst decline ever: −69.1%, from July 18, 2007 to March 9, 2009; back at its high by March 19, 2012

| Period | CP total return |
| --- | --- |
| 1 month | +0.8% |
| 3 months | −4.5% |
| 6 months | +7.4% |
| year to date | +18.1% |
| 1 year | +15.1% |
| 3 years | +25.6% |
| 5 years | +21.6% |
| 10 years | +227% |

## CP against the whole market

Where CP ranks among every stock and fund, and what across the market has done better.

### How does CP rank among all stocks?

This section ranks CP on return, volatility, risk-adjusted return and worst decline against every stock worth at least $300 million with enough history.

- CP's worst decline of the past 10 years ranks in the top 2% of the 2,187 stocks worth at least $300 million, where the top fell the least.

| Measure | CP | Rank |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1-year return | +15.1% | 1,398 of 3,287 (top 43%) |
| 3-year return | +25.6% | 1,934 of 3,017 (top 65%) |
| 5-year return | +21.6% | 1,436 of 2,893 (top 50%) |
| 10-year return | +227% | 777 of 2,202 (top 36%) |
| Volatility, 5 years | 24.1% | 272 of 2,893 (top 10%) |
| Sharpe ratio, 5 years | 0.28 | 1,614 of 2,893 (top 56%) |
| Worst decline, past 10 years | −33.7% | 54 of 2,187 (top 3%) |

### What has beaten CP on both return and risk?

Each dot is an investment, placed by how much it earned a year over the past 5 years (higher is better) and how much its price swung, its volatility (further left is calmer).

- 103 stocks and 575 ETFs worth at least $500 million sit in the green region: each earned more than CP over the past 5 years with smaller price swings. That is 19% of the 3,633 screened.
- Among those with at least half CP's swings, DXJ has the best return for its risk: 26.6% a year at 19.1% volatility, 21% less than CP's 24.1%, and a Sharpe ratio (return above cash per unit of volatility) of 1.34 against 0.28 for CP.
- Among CP's popular alternatives, BRK-B is in the region. BRK-B earned 13.4% a year against 4.0% a year for CP, at 17.1% volatility, 29% less than CP's 24.1%.

### Is there a better investment than CP?

The table below lists investments that beat CP over the past 5 years on at least one of these measures: a higher annual return with lower volatility, a higher annual return at similar volatility, a similar return with lower volatility, a higher Sharpe ratio with a smaller worst decline, a higher total return in most periods from 3 months to 10 years, or smaller losses in recent market crashes.

- Among CP's popular alternatives, BRK-B earned more than CP with less volatility over the past 5 years: 13.4% a year at 17.1% volatility, against 4.0% a year at 24.1%.
- Looking beyond its popular alternatives, TRV (property & casualty insurance) and CB (property & casualty insurance) earned more than CP with less volatility over the past 5 years. TRV returned 22.4% a year at 22.3% volatility, against 4.0% a year at 24.1%.
- Simply owning the S&P 500 would have done better over the past 5 years: 12.7% a year at 17.1% volatility, against 4.0% at 24.1% for CP.

The 15 strongest of 678 investments that beat CP over the past 5 years, out of 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million.

| Investment | Group | Annual return (5 years) | Volatility | Sharpe | Worst decline (10 years) | 10Y return | Correlation with CP | Better on |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| CP: Canadian Pacific Kansas City Ltd. (this page) |  | +4.0% | 24.1% | 0.28 | −33.7% | +227% |  |  |
| [JNJ](https://easycompare.io/research/jnj): Johnson & Johnson | Pharmaceuticals | +12.7% | 17.9% | 0.76 | −27.4% | +196% | 0.31 | Higher return, lower volatility; Higher Sharpe, smaller worst decline; Higher return in most periods |
| [NVS](https://easycompare.io/research/nvs): Novartis AG | Pharmaceuticals | +17.1% | 20.7% | 0.87 | −26.8% | +226% | 0.46 | Higher return, lower volatility; Higher Sharpe, smaller worst decline; Higher return in most periods |
| PTNQ: Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF | Technology | +9.7% | 14.1% | 0.73 | −28.1% | +305% | 0.28 | Higher return, lower volatility; Higher Sharpe, smaller worst decline; Higher return in most periods; Smaller losses in recent crashes |
| DXJ: WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund | International Equity | +26.6% | 19.1% | 1.34 | −39.1% | +428% | 0.45 | Higher return, lower volatility; Higher return in most periods; Smaller losses in recent crashes |
| [DFAC](https://easycompare.io/research/dfac): Dimensional - US Core Equity 2 ETF | US Total Market | +11.4% | 17.0% | 0.72 | −23.1% | — | 0.70 | Higher return, lower volatility; Higher Sharpe, smaller worst decline; Higher return in most periods |
| FMAR: FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - March | Multi-Asset | +10.6% | 10.4% | 1.02 | −14.4% | — | 0.67 | Higher return, lower volatility; Higher Sharpe, smaller worst decline; Higher return in most periods |
| [XLV](https://easycompare.io/research/xlv): State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF | Health Care Equity | +8.4% | 15.3% | 0.60 | −28.4% | +202% | 0.57 | Higher return, lower volatility; Higher Sharpe, smaller worst decline; Higher return in most periods |
| CHT: Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. | Integrated Telecommunications | +7.7% | 13.3% | 0.63 | −23.8% | +101% | 0.30 | Higher return, lower volatility; Higher Sharpe, smaller worst decline; Higher return in most periods |
| DFIV: Dimensional - International Value ETF | International Equity | +14.8% | 16.4% | 0.93 | −25.4% | — | 0.65 | Higher return, lower volatility; Higher Sharpe, smaller worst decline; Higher return in most periods |
| AVLV: Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF | US Large-Cap Value | +14.0% | 16.9% | 0.86 | −19.5% | — | 0.71 | Higher return, lower volatility; Higher Sharpe, smaller worst decline; Higher return in most periods |
| DFAT: Dimensional - US Targeted Value ETF | US Small-Cap Equity | +9.6% | 21.0% | 0.54 | −26.1% | — | 0.63 | Higher return, lower volatility; Higher Sharpe, smaller worst decline; Higher return in most periods |
| DFAI: Dimensional - International Core Equity Market ETF | Developed International Equity | +9.7% | 16.0% | 0.66 | −27.4% | — | 0.72 | Higher return, lower volatility; Higher Sharpe, smaller worst decline; Higher return in most periods |
| [RY](https://easycompare.io/research/ry): Royal Bank of Canada | Banks | +17.3% | 18.2% | 0.97 | −40.0% | +352% | 0.51 | Higher return, lower volatility; Higher return in most periods |
| XLP: State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF | Consumer Staples | +7.2% | 13.8% | 0.57 | −24.5% | +121% | 0.61 | Higher return, lower volatility; Higher Sharpe, smaller worst decline; Higher return in most periods |
| JAVA: JPMorgan Active Value ETF | US Large-Cap Value | +11.5% | 14.5% | 0.82 | −16.5% | — |  | Higher return, lower volatility; Higher Sharpe, smaller worst decline; Higher return in most periods |

## CP against its popular alternatives

The investments people most often weigh against CP, compared period by period and year by year.

### How do CP's risk and return compare with its alternatives?

This map plots each investment's annual return over the past 5 years against its volatility, the size of its typical price swings.

- BRK-B, CSX and UNP were both more rewarding and calmer than CP over the past 5 years, earning a higher annual return with lower volatility.
- Over the past 5 years, CP returned 4.0% a year, less than the S&P 500's 12.7%, with higher volatility (24.1% against 17.1%).

### Has CP consistently beaten its popular alternatives?

This section compares CP with the investments people most often weigh against it, checking each one over eight periods from one month to ten years.

- Five of the ten popular alternatives, led by CSX, UNP and NSC, outperformed CP in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes.
- CSX and UNP outperformed CP in every long-term period and in all but one short-term period, the most consistent record in the group.
- BRK-B earned more for the risk it took than CP (a higher Sharpe ratio) and fell less in its worst decline of the past 10 years.

| Investment | 1Y return | 3Y return | 5Y return | 10Y return | Periods ahead of CP | Verdict | Sharpe |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| CP: Canadian Pacific Kansas City Ltd. (this page) | +15.1% | +25.6% | +21.6% | +227% |  |  | 0.28 |
| [CSX](https://easycompare.io/research/csx): CSX Corporation | +32.8% | +63.0% | +49.3% | +446% | 5/5 short-term, 3/3 long-term | all-weather | 0.46 |
| [UNP](https://easycompare.io/research/unp): Union Pacific Corporation | +29.2% | +45.4% | +41.2% | +295% | 5/5 short-term, 3/3 long-term | all-weather | 0.42 |
| [NSC](https://easycompare.io/research/nsc): Norfolk Southern Corporation | +13.8% | +72.0% | +29.5% | +328% | 3/5 short-term, 3/3 long-term | consistent | 0.33 |
| [BRK-B](https://easycompare.io/research/brk-b): Berkshire Hathaway Inc. | +9.3% | +60.7% | +87.8% | +274% | 3/5 short-term, 3/3 long-term | consistent | 0.82 |
| [WAB](https://easycompare.io/research/wab): Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation | +45.3% | +189% | +212% | +264% | 3/5 short-term, 3/3 long-term | consistent | 1.00 |
| JBHT: J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc. | +37.9% | +32.2% | +21.6% | +220% | 1/5 short-term, 1/3 long-term |  | 0.28 |
| TRN: Trinity Industries, Inc. | −8.8% | +29.7% | +2.5% | +107% | 0/5 short-term, 1/3 long-term |  | 0.19 |
| [CNI](https://easycompare.io/research/cni): Canadian National Railway Company | +30.2% | +21.9% | +3.1% | +124% | 5/5 short-term, 0/3 long-term |  | 0.14 |
| GBX: The Greenbrier Companies, Inc. | −15.7% | −0.7% | −9.4% | +38.6% | 0/5 short-term, 0/3 long-term |  | 0.16 |
| HUBG: Hub Group, Inc. | −28.8% | −29.8% | −27.6% | +38.4% | 0/5 short-term, 0/3 long-term |  | 0.00 |

### How did CP do year by year?

This table shows each investment's total return in every full calendar year since 1997, along with where CP ranked among its popular alternatives each year.

- CP finished ahead of the S&P 500 in 20 of its 29 full calendar years, and behind it in each of the last three.
- Among its popular alternatives, WAB came out ahead of CP most often, in 16 of the 29 years both traded.
- Ranked against its popular alternatives each year, CP finished in the top quarter in nine of 29 years and in the bottom quarter in seven. In 2025, it ranked 7 of 11.

| Year | CP | SPY |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2025 | +2.6% | +17.7% |
| 2024 | −7.8% | +24.9% |
| 2023 | +6.8% | +26.2% |
| 2022 | +4.5% | −18.2% |
| 2021 | +4.7% | +28.7% |
| 2020 | +37.4% | +18.3% |
| 2019 | +45.1% | +31.2% |
| 2018 | −1.8% | −4.6% |
| 2017 | +29.4% | +21.7% |
| 2016 | +13.0% | +12.0% |

## Risk and diversification

How CP has fallen, how it held up in crashes beside the S&P 500 and its popular alternatives, and what moves independently of it.

### What were CP's worst declines?

A drawdown is the decline from a peak to the lowest point before a new high.

- In all three of CP's worst declines, the S&P 500 held up better over the same dates.
- Not every decline was the market's doing: CP fell 51.1% from October 2014 to January 2016, while the S&P 500 slipped only 2.9%.
- The slowest recovery came after CP fell 48.7% from August 1989 to November 1992; it did not regain that peak until February 1996, three years later.

| Decline | Peak | Low | Back at the high | SPY over the same dates | Market event |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| −69.1% | July 18, 2007 | March 9, 2009 | March 19, 2012 | −54.4% | 2008 financial crisis |
| −51.1% | October 6, 2014 | January 20, 2016 | August 27, 2018 | −2.9% | 2015 China and oil sell-off |
| −48.7% | August 30, 1989 | November 17, 1992 | February 6, 1996 | — |  |
| −45.2% | May 21, 1998 | March 3, 1999 | January 29, 2001 | +11.7% |  |
| −37.4% | July 22, 1987 | December 4, 1987 | July 19, 1989 | — |  |

### How did CP do in stock market crashes?

This section measures how far CP, the S&P 500 and each alternative fell from peak to trough during every major market crash since 2000.

- Among its popular alternatives, CNI held up best, falling less than CP in seven of the ten crashes they both traded through.
- CP fell less than the S&P 500 in five of the ten crashes it has traded through. The clearest case was the dot-com bust, when CP fell 35.7% and the S&P 500 fell 47.5%.

| Crash | Dates | CP fall | SPY fall |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Dot-com bust | March 10, 2000 to October 9, 2002 | −35.7% | −47.5% |
| Global financial crisis | October 9, 2007 to March 9, 2009 | −65.4% | −55.2% |
| Flash crash | May 6, 2010 to May 7, 2010 | −0.4% | −1.5% |
| Euro debt crisis | July 22, 2011 to October 3, 2011 | −29.8% | −17.9% |
| China devaluation & oil rout | August 10, 2015 to February 11, 2016 | −35.1% | −12.8% |
| Volmageddon | February 2, 2018 to February 9, 2018 | −4.3% | −6.5% |
| Q4 2018 selloff | September 21, 2018 to December 24, 2018 | −24.4% | −19.3% |
| COVID crash | February 19, 2020 to March 23, 2020 | −32.9% | −33.7% |
| 2022 bear market | January 4, 2022 to October 12, 2022 | −19.9% | −24.5% |
| SVB / regional bank stress | March 8, 2023 to March 13, 2023 | −3.0% | −3.4% |

### How closely does CP move with the S&P 500?

Upside capture measures how much of the S&P 500's gains an investment kept in the months the market rose, and downside capture how much of its losses it took in the months the market fell.

- BRK-B took just 69% of the S&P 500's losses, against 113% for CP, while still keeping 78% of its gains.
- Over the past 10 years, CP captured 96% of the S&P 500's gains in rising months and 113% of its losses in falling months, with a beta of 1.00. Its share of the market's losses was larger than its share of the gains.
- Four of the ten popular alternatives had a higher capture ratio (upside capture divided by downside capture) than CP's 0.85, led by BRK-B, CSX and UNP.

Measured over the past 10 years of monthly returns against SPY.

| Investment | Upside capture | Downside capture | Beta |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| CP: Canadian Pacific Kansas City Ltd. (this page) | 96.0% | 113% | 1.00 |
| [CSX](https://easycompare.io/research/csx): CSX Corporation | 118% | 117% | 1.19 |
| [UNP](https://easycompare.io/research/unp): Union Pacific Corporation | 104% | 119% | 1.05 |
| [NSC](https://easycompare.io/research/nsc): Norfolk Southern Corporation | 123% | 147% | 1.30 |
| [BRK-B](https://easycompare.io/research/brk-b): Berkshire Hathaway Inc. | 78.0% | 69.0% | 0.74 |
| [WAB](https://easycompare.io/research/wab): Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation | 111% | 127% | 1.28 |
| JBHT: J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc. | 109% | 137% | 1.18 |
| TRN: Trinity Industries, Inc. | 110% | 165% | 1.38 |
| [CNI](https://easycompare.io/research/cni): Canadian National Railway Company | 80.0% | 105% | 0.89 |
| GBX: The Greenbrier Companies, Inc. | 124% | 211% | 1.50 |
| HUBG: Hub Group, Inc. | 100% | 167% | 1.13 |

### What diversifies CP?

Correlation measures how closely two investments move together, on a scale from 1 (in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to -1 (in opposite directions).

- Moving a fifth of the money in CP into GLD would have cut the portfolio's volatility by 16% over the past 5 years and raised its annual return (+6.3% for CP alone, +9.2% for the mix).
- Among large ETFs, DXJ, EWP and SMH have moved largely independently of CP over the past 5 years, with correlations of 0.49 or lower, and each still earned a positive 5-year return.
- CAH made money in three of the five calendar years in which CP lost money.

| Investment | Correlation with CP | 5Y return | Volatility | Sharpe | Rose in CP's 5 down years |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| DXJ: WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund | 0.45 | +225% | 19.1% | 1.34 | 2 of 5 |
| EWP: iShares MSCI Spain ETF | 0.49 | +140% | 20.3% | 0.97 | 2 of 5 |
| [SMH](https://easycompare.io/research/smh): VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.39 | +323% | 36.9% | 0.97 | 1 of 5 |
| [GLD](https://easycompare.io/research/gld): SPDR Gold Shares | 0.25 | +126% | 18.9% | 0.96 | 2 of 5 |
| [XLE](https://easycompare.io/research/xle): State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | 0.37 | +177% | 25.5% | 0.93 | 1 of 5 |
| EWT: iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF | 0.42 | +153% | 24.2% | 0.89 | 1 of 5 |
| AMLP: Alerian MLP ETF | 0.41 | +111% | 18.9% | 0.89 | 1 of 5 |
| EDIV: State Street SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF | 0.46 | +69.9% | 13.8% | 0.84 | 1 of 5 |

## Common questions

### What was CP's worst drawdown?

CP's deepest decline since it began trading in 1986 was 69.1%, from July 2007 to March 2009. It took about three years from the low to climb back to its old high.

### What were CP's best and worst years?

Over 29 full calendar years, CP's best year was 2009, when it returned 64.1%. Its worst was 2008, with a return of -47.1%.

### Is there a better investment than CP?

Among CP's popular alternatives, BRK-B earned more than CP with less volatility over the past 5 years: 13.4% a year at 17.1% volatility, against 4.0% a year at 24.1%. Looking beyond its popular alternatives, TRV (property & casualty insurance) and CB (property & casualty insurance) earned more than CP with less volatility over the past 5 years. TRV returned 22.4% a year at 22.3% volatility, against 4.0% a year at 24.1%.

### Is CP more volatile than the S&P 500?

Yes. CP's volatility over the past 5 years was 24.1%, 1.4 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, CP's return lands within 24.1% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump.

### What is CP's Sharpe ratio?

CP's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.28, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so CP earned less for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings.

### How correlated is CP with the S&P 500?

Over the past 5 years, CP's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.69 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They often move together: some diversification next to an index fund, but not a cushion. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against CP instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a CP holding.

### What are the best alternatives to CP?

Of the ten popular alternatives we compared, five outperformed CP in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes, with dividends reinvested: CSX, UNP and NSC.

### Did CP outperform the S&P 500?

CP finished ahead of the S&P 500 (SPY) in 20 of 29 full calendar years. In 2025, it returned +2.6%, against +17.7% for the index.

### How did CP do in stock market crashes?

CP fell less than the S&P 500 (SPY) in five of the ten major crashes it has traded through, and further in four. The clearest case was the dot-com bust, when CP fell 35.7% and the S&P 500 fell 47.5%.

### What diversifies CP?

These had a low correlation with CP over the past 5 years and still earned a positive 5-year return: among large ETFs, DXJ (correlation 0.45), EWP (correlation 0.49) and SMH (correlation 0.39); among large stocks, CAH (correlation 0.21), CLS (correlation 0.20) and FIX (correlation 0.46). A correlation near zero means the two have moved largely independently.

## More research

- [CSX Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/csx)
- [Union Pacific (UNP) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/unp)
- [Norfolk Southern (NSC) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/nsc)
- [Berkshire Hathaway (BRK-B) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/brk-b)
- [Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies (WAB) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/wab)
- [Canadian National Railway (CNI) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/cni)
- [Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/schd)
- [NVIDIA (NVDA) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/nvda)
- [Apple (AAPL) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/aapl)
- [Alphabet (GOOG) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/goog)
- [Microsoft (MSFT) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/msft)
- [Amazon.com (AMZN) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/amzn)

## Explore further

- Full page with charts: https://easycompare.io/research/cp
- All research pages: https://easycompare.io/llms.txt
- Compare the entire market against CP live: https://betterthanspy.com/?b=CP&utm_source=easycompare&utm_medium=research