# How Brookfield Finance (BNH) compares with the whole market and its popular alternatives

> Source: EasyCompare research, https://easycompare.io/research/bnh
> Data as of October 20, 2026. Total returns include reinvested dividends. Past performance does not predict future results; nothing here is investment advice.

Built by QuantCommons' quantitative engine, this page is about relative opportunity, not data on BNH alone. It places BNH (Brookfield Finance Inc.) against 9 popular alternatives, its neighboring categories and the entire market of over 10,000 U.S.-listed stocks and ETFs, and surfaces what has done better on consistent outperformance, return for the risk taken, behavior in real market crashes and diversification. The result is a clearer view of where BNH stands in the market, and of the alternatives worth a closer look.

Period covered: BNH's full trading record, from October 2020 through September 2026. The crash tests reach back to 2000 using older funds and the S&P 500. All returns include reinvested dividends. Data as of October 20, 2026.

## Key findings

- **Right now:** The slide is BNH's own: it is 22.0% below its high, against 1.3% for the S&P 500. BNH has gone against the market, falling 7.0% over the past 6 months while the S&P 500 rose 9.1%.
- **Stock or market?:** Beta versus the S&P 500 is 0.76, which would have pointed to 3.0% over the past 3 months. BNH fell 6.7% instead.
- **Past 1 to 3 years:** Over the past year, BNH fell 5.7% while the S&P 500 rose 15.8%. The same gap shows up over 3 years (19.1% against 89.3%). Even so, BNH lagged its junior subordinated debt peers in 2023, then moved up the pack in 2025.
- **Long term:** BNH turned $10,000 into $7,870 over the past 5 years, against $18,200 in the S&P 500. Even so, over the past 5 years, only BEPH (Brookfield BRP Holdings (Canada) Inc 4.625 % Notes 2021-Without Fixed Maturity Global Sub) and BIPH (Brookfield Infrastructure Finance ULC 5 % Notes 2021-24.05.81 Global) of its junior subordinated debt peers outpaced BNH.
- **In a crash:** In the 2022 bear market, BNH fell 31.7%, against 24.5% for the S&P 500, and less than junior subordinated debt peers such as BEPI (Brookfield Renewable Partners, 36.3%).
- **Diversification:** Against the S&P 500, BNH has a correlation of 0.56 over 5 years, more closely than 85% of stocks worth at least $300 million. Next to an index fund it is some diversification, but not a hedge.
- **Better options**
  - **Popular alternatives:** PFF (iShares Preferred and Income Securities ETF), BND (Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF) and PGX (Invesco Preferred ETF) earned more than BNH with less volatility over the past 5 years. PFF returned a loss of 0.2% a year at 10.5% volatility, against a loss of 4.7% a year at 19.8%.
  - **Nearby categories and themes:** USHY (iShares Broad USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF, high yield bonds) and IBDT (iShares iBonds Dec 2028 Term Corporate ETF, investment grade bonds) earned more than BNH with less volatility over the past 5 years. USHY returned 3.6% a year at 7.4% volatility, against a loss of 4.7% a year at 19.8%.
  - **Whole market:** 719 of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than BNH with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them VTI (Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF), VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) and BRK-B (Berkshire Hathaway).

## How much would $10,000 in BNH have grown?

This chart tracks a hypothetical $10,000 investment in BNH over the past 5 years, with dividends reinvested, alongside the same amount in the S&P 500, investments that ended ahead of BNH over the same span and BNH's popular alternatives, among those that traded for the entire period.

- $10,000 invested in BNH at the end of September 2021 would have grown to $7,815 by September 2026, less than the $19,000 it would have become in SPY, an S&P 500 fund.
- All seven other investments on the chart ended ahead of BNH, and BN finished highest, at $13,162.

## BNH at a glance

This section summarizes the key facts about the stock, its returns over periods from one to ten years and the risk it has carried, with dividends reinvested throughout.

- BNH is still 22.0% below its all-time high.
- BNH's deepest decline since it began trading in 2020 was 37.0%, from October 2021 to May 2023. It has not yet climbed back to that peak.
- Over five full calendar years, BNH's best was 2023, when it returned 19.3%, and its worst was 2022, when it lost 35.5%. It lost money in one of those years.

- Type: Stock, Financials (Asset Management)
- Trading since: October 21, 2020
- Market value: $82B
- Volatility (5 years): 19.8%; Sharpe ratio: -0.14
- Worst decline ever: −37.0%, from October 14, 2021 to May 16, 2023; not yet back at its high

| Period | BNH total return |
| --- | --- |
| 1 month | −2.5% |
| 3 months | −6.7% |
| 6 months | −7.0% |
| year to date | −6.5% |
| 1 year | −5.7% |
| 3 years | +19.1% |
| 5 years | −21.3% |

## BNH against the whole market

Where BNH ranks among every stock and fund, and what across the market has done better.

### How does BNH rank among all stocks?

This section ranks BNH on return, volatility, risk-adjusted return and worst decline against every stock worth at least $300 million with enough history.

- BNH is among the steadier stocks: its price swings rank in the top 3% of the 2,893 stocks worth at least $300 million, where the top is the calmest.
- On return for the risk taken (the Sharpe ratio), BNH ranks in the bottom 10% of the 2,893 stocks worth at least $300 million.

| Measure | BNH | Rank |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1-year return | −5.7% | 2,210 of 3,287 (top 68%) |
| 3-year return | +19.1% | 2,037 of 3,017 (top 68%) |
| 5-year return | −21.3% | 2,024 of 2,893 (top 70%) |
| Volatility, 5 years | 19.8% | 85 of 2,893 (top 3%) |
| Sharpe ratio, 5 years | -0.14 | 2,610 of 2,893 (top 91%) |

### What has beaten BNH on both return and risk?

Each dot is an investment, placed by how much it earned a year over the past 5 years (higher is better) and how much its price swung, its volatility (further left is calmer).

- 49 stocks and 670 ETFs worth at least $500 million sit in the green region: each earned more than BNH over the past 5 years with smaller price swings. That is 20% of the 3,633 screened.
- Among those with at least half BNH's swings, LVHI has the best return for its risk: 17.0% a year at 11.1% volatility, 44% less than BNH's 19.8%, and a Sharpe ratio (return above cash per unit of volatility) of 1.48 against -0.14 for BNH. MPLX earned the most, 23.5% a year, while still swinging less than BNH (18.8% against 19.8%).
- Among BNH's popular alternatives, PFF, BND and PGX are in the region. PFF earned a loss of 0.2% a year against a loss of 4.7% a year for BNH, at 10.5% volatility, 47% less than BNH's 19.8%.

### Is there a better investment than BNH?

The table below lists investments that beat BNH over the past 5 years on at least one of these measures: a higher annual return with lower volatility, a higher annual return at similar volatility, a similar return with lower volatility, a higher Sharpe ratio with a smaller worst decline, a higher total return in most periods from 3 months to 10 years, or smaller losses in recent market crashes.

- Among BNH's popular alternatives, PFF, BND and PGX earned more than BNH with less volatility over the past 5 years. PFF returned a loss of 0.2% a year at 10.5% volatility, against a loss of 4.7% a year at 19.8%.
- Looking beyond its popular alternatives, USHY (high yield bonds) and IBDT (investment grade bonds) earned more than BNH with less volatility over the past 5 years. USHY returned 3.6% a year at 7.4% volatility, against a loss of 4.7% a year at 19.8%.
- Across the whole market, 719 of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than BNH with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them VTI, VOO and BRK-B.

The 15 strongest of 719 investments that beat BNH over the past 5 years, out of 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million.

| Investment | Group | Annual return (5 years) | Volatility | Sharpe | Worst decline (10 years) | 5Y return | Correlation with BNH | Better on |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| BNH: Brookfield Finance Inc. (this page) |  | −4.7% | 19.8% | -0.14 | −37.0% | −21.3% |  |  |
| [BRK-B](https://easycompare.io/research/brk-b): Berkshire Hathaway Inc. | Insurance | +13.4% | 17.1% | 0.82 | −29.6% | +87.8% | 0.32 | Higher return, lower volatility; Higher Sharpe, smaller worst decline; Higher return in most periods |
| [JNJ](https://easycompare.io/research/jnj): Johnson & Johnson | Pharmaceuticals | +12.7% | 17.9% | 0.76 | −27.4% | +82.1% | 0.12 | Higher return, lower volatility; Higher Sharpe, smaller worst decline; Higher return in most periods |
| BALT: Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF | Crypto | +6.3% | 3.3% | 1.85 | −4.9% | +35.7% | 0.44 | Higher return, lower volatility; Higher Sharpe, smaller worst decline; Higher return in most periods |
| FLRT: Pacer Aristotle Pacific Floating Rate High Income ETF | Financials | +6.0% | 2.3% | 2.55 | −21.0% | +33.9% | 0.37 | Higher return, lower volatility; Higher Sharpe, smaller worst decline; Higher return in most periods |
| [VIG](https://easycompare.io/research/vig): Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF | US Dividend Equity | +10.4% | 14.1% | 0.78 | −31.7% | +64.0% | 0.49 | Higher return, lower volatility; Higher Sharpe, smaller worst decline; Higher return in most periods |
| [EP-PC](https://easycompare.io/research/ep-pc): El Paso Energy Capital Trust I PFD CV TR SECS | Preferred Stocks | +5.2% | 8.9% | 0.61 | −25.4% | +28.5% | 0.34 | Higher return, lower volatility; Higher Sharpe, smaller worst decline; Higher return in most periods |
| [DFAC](https://easycompare.io/research/dfac): Dimensional - US Core Equity 2 ETF | US Total Market | +11.4% | 17.0% | 0.72 | −23.1% | +71.5% | 0.58 | Higher return, lower volatility; Higher Sharpe, smaller worst decline; Higher return in most periods |
| PJUL: Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF | Broad Market | +10.5% | 8.6% | 1.20 | −18.2% | +64.4% | 0.51 | Higher return, lower volatility; Higher Sharpe, smaller worst decline; Higher return in most periods |
| FJAN: FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - January | Multi-Asset | +11.1% | 10.5% | 1.05 | −13.6% | +69.0% | 0.54 | Higher return, lower volatility; Higher Sharpe, smaller worst decline; Higher return in most periods |
| [JEPI](https://easycompare.io/research/jepi): JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF | Equity Income | +7.5% | 11.0% | 0.71 | −13.7% | +43.3% | 0.46 | Higher return, lower volatility; Higher Sharpe, smaller worst decline; Higher return in most periods |
| [ED](https://easycompare.io/research/ed): Consolidated Edison, Inc. | Electric Utilities | +12.0% | 18.8% | 0.70 | −30.9% | +76.3% | 0.18 | Higher return, lower volatility; Higher Sharpe, smaller worst decline; Higher return in most periods |
| [XLV](https://easycompare.io/research/xlv): State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF | Health Care Equity | +8.4% | 15.3% | 0.60 | −28.4% | +49.3% | 0.30 | Higher return, lower volatility; Higher Sharpe, smaller worst decline; Higher return in most periods |
| CHT: Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. | Integrated Telecommunications | +7.7% | 13.3% | 0.63 | −23.8% | +45.1% | 0.10 | Higher return, lower volatility; Higher Sharpe, smaller worst decline; Higher return in most periods |
| DFIV: Dimensional - International Value ETF | International Equity | +14.8% | 16.4% | 0.93 | −25.4% | +99.4% | 0.47 | Higher return, lower volatility; Higher Sharpe, smaller worst decline; Higher return in most periods |
| AVLV: Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF | US Large-Cap Value | +14.0% | 16.9% | 0.86 | −19.5% | +92.2% | 0.53 | Higher return, lower volatility; Higher Sharpe, smaller worst decline; Higher return in most periods |

## BNH against its popular alternatives

The investments people most often weigh against BNH, compared period by period and year by year.

### How do BNH's risk and return compare with its alternatives?

This map plots each investment's annual return over the past 5 years against its volatility, the size of its typical price swings.

- PFF, BND and PGX were both more rewarding and calmer than BNH over the past 5 years, earning a higher annual return with lower volatility.
- Over the past 5 years, BNH returned -4.7% a year, less than the S&P 500's 12.7%, with higher volatility (19.8% against 17.1%).

### Has BNH consistently beaten its popular alternatives?

This section compares BNH with the investments people most often weigh against it, checking each one over seven periods from one month to five years.

- Three of the nine popular alternatives, PFF, BIPH and BEPH, outperformed BNH in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 2 long-term timeframes.
- PFF, BIPH and BEPH outperformed BNH in every long-term period and in all but one short-term period, the most consistent record in the group.
- PFF and BND earned more for the risk they took than BNH (a higher Sharpe ratio) and fell less in their worst decline of the past 10 years.

| Investment | 1Y return | 3Y return | 5Y return | Periods ahead of BNH | Verdict | Sharpe |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| BNH: Brookfield Finance Inc. (this page) | −5.7% | +19.1% | −21.3% |  |  | -0.14 |
| PFF: iShares Preferred and Income Securities ETF | −3.8% | +21.6% | −0.9% | 4/5 short-term, 2/2 long-term | all-weather | 0.04 |
| BIPH: Brookfield Infrastructure Finance ULC 5 % Notes 2021-24.05.81 Global | −4.1% | +25.4% | −16.1% | 4/5 short-term, 2/2 long-term | all-weather | -0.02 |
| BEPH: Brookfield BRP Holdings (Canada) Inc 4.625 % Notes 2021-Without Fixed Maturity Global Sub | −3.5% | +32.3% | −19.5% | 4/5 short-term, 2/2 long-term | all-weather | -0.10 |
| [BN](https://easycompare.io/research/bn): Brookfield Corporation | −16.8% | +85.9% | +20.8% | 1/5 short-term, 2/2 long-term |  | 0.28 |
| [BND](https://easycompare.io/research/bnd): Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF | −2.1% | +15.7% | −1.8% | 5/5 short-term, 1/2 long-term |  | -0.03 |
| BEPI: Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. | −2.5% | +34.9% | — | 4/5 short-term, 1/2 long-term |  | — |
| [BNJ](https://easycompare.io/research/bnj): Brookfield Finance Inc. 4.50% P | −4.6% | +23.8% | −23.6% | 3/5 short-term, 1/2 long-term |  | -0.20 |
| [BAM](https://easycompare.io/research/bam): Brookfield Asset Management Ltd. | −12.5% | +67.9% | — | 3/5 short-term, 1/2 long-term |  | — |
| PGX: Invesco Preferred ETF | −8.7% | +16.0% | −11.0% | 0/5 short-term, 1/2 long-term |  | -0.15 |

### How did BNH do year by year?

This table shows each investment's total return in every full calendar year since 2021, along with where BNH ranked among its popular alternatives each year.

- BNH finished ahead of the S&P 500 in no of its five full calendar years, and behind it in each of the last five.
- Among its popular alternatives, BN came out ahead of BNH most often, in four of the five years both traded.
- Ranked against its popular alternatives each year, BNH finished in the top quarter in one of five years and in the bottom quarter in one. In 2025, it ranked 3 of 10.

| Year | BNH | SPY |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2025 | +5.8% | +17.7% |
| 2024 | +4.1% | +24.9% |
| 2023 | +19.3% | +26.2% |
| 2022 | −35.5% | −18.2% |
| 2021 | +1.8% | +28.7% |

## Risk and diversification

How BNH has fallen, how it held up in crashes beside the S&P 500 and its popular alternatives, and what moves independently of it.

### What were BNH's worst declines?

A drawdown is the decline from a peak to the lowest point before a new high.

- None of these declines kept BNH below its old high for long; the longest climb back took four months.

| Decline | Peak | Low | Back at the high | SPY over the same dates | Market event |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| −37.0% | October 14, 2021 | May 16, 2023 | not yet | −5.1% | 2022 bear market |
| −11.7% | December 31, 2020 | February 25, 2021 | June 11, 2021 | +2.3% |  |

### How did BNH do in stock market crashes?

This section measures how far BNH, the S&P 500 and each alternative fell from peak to trough during every major market crash since 2000.

- BNH fell further than the S&P 500 in all two crashes it has traded through. The clearest case was the 2022 bear market, when BNH fell 31.7% and the S&P 500 fell 24.5%.
- Among its popular alternatives, BND held up best, falling less than BNH in all two crashes they both traded through.
- BNH began trading after the 2008 financial crisis, but three of its popular alternatives lived through it. The mildest fall among them was BND's 9.3%, against 55.2% for the S&P 500.

| Crash | Dates | BNH fall | SPY fall |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Dot-com bust | March 10, 2000 to October 9, 2002 | not trading | −47.5% |
| Global financial crisis | October 9, 2007 to March 9, 2009 | not trading | −55.2% |
| Flash crash | May 6, 2010 to May 7, 2010 | not trading | −1.5% |
| Euro debt crisis | July 22, 2011 to October 3, 2011 | not trading | −17.9% |
| China devaluation & oil rout | August 10, 2015 to February 11, 2016 | not trading | −12.8% |
| Volmageddon | February 2, 2018 to February 9, 2018 | not trading | −6.5% |
| Q4 2018 selloff | September 21, 2018 to December 24, 2018 | not trading | −19.3% |
| COVID crash | February 19, 2020 to March 23, 2020 | not trading | −33.7% |
| 2022 bear market | January 4, 2022 to October 12, 2022 | −31.7% | −24.5% |
| SVB / regional bank stress | March 8, 2023 to March 13, 2023 | −5.4% | −3.4% |

### How closely does BNH move with the S&P 500?

Upside capture measures how much of the S&P 500's gains an investment kept in the months the market rose, and downside capture how much of its losses it took in the months the market fell.

- Six of the seven popular alternatives had a higher capture ratio (upside capture divided by downside capture) than BNH's 0.43, led by BN, PFF and BIPH.
- BNJ took just 123% of the S&P 500's losses, against 138% for BNH, while still keeping 52% of its gains.
- Over the past 5 years, BNH captured 60% of the S&P 500's gains in rising months and 138% of its losses in falling months, with a beta of 0.76. Its share of the market's losses was larger than its share of the gains.

Measured over the past 5 years of monthly returns against SPY.

| Investment | Upside capture | Downside capture | Beta |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| BNH: Brookfield Finance Inc. (this page) | 60.0% | 138% | 0.76 |
| PFF: iShares Preferred and Income Securities ETF | 45.0% | 79.0% | 0.54 |
| BIPH: Brookfield Infrastructure Finance ULC 5 % Notes 2021-24.05.81 Global | 72.0% | 150% | 0.96 |
| BEPH: Brookfield BRP Holdings (Canada) Inc 4.625 % Notes 2021-Without Fixed Maturity Global Sub | 57.0% | 126% | 0.78 |
| [BN](https://easycompare.io/research/bn): Brookfield Corporation | 133% | 199% | 1.57 |
| [BND](https://easycompare.io/research/bnd): Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF | 19.0% | 39.0% | 0.26 |
| [BNJ](https://easycompare.io/research/bnj): Brookfield Finance Inc. 4.50% P | 52.0% | 123% | 0.68 |
| PGX: Invesco Preferred ETF | 41.0% | 87.0% | 0.55 |

### What diversifies BNH?

Correlation measures how closely two investments move together, on a scale from 1 (in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to -1 (in opposite directions).

- Moving a fifth of the money in BNH into MCK would have cut the portfolio's volatility by 17% over the past 5 years and raised its annual return (-4.8% for BNH alone, +2.9% for the mix).
- Among large ETFs, LVHI, DXJ and EMLP have moved largely independently of BNH over the past 5 years, with correlations of 0.41 or lower, and each still earned a positive 5-year return.
- In 2022, the one year BNH lost money (-35.5%), MCK returned +51.8%.

| Investment | Correlation with BNH | 5Y return | Volatility | Sharpe | Rose in BNH's 1 down years |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| LVHI: Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 0.41 | +119% | 11.1% | 1.48 | 1 of 1 |
| DXJ: WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund | 0.28 | +225% | 19.1% | 1.34 | 1 of 1 |
| EMLP: First Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund | 0.34 | +101% | 14.5% | 1.04 | 1 of 1 |
| HDV: iShares Core High Dividend ETF | 0.29 | +83.3% | 13.0% | 1.00 | 1 of 1 |
| FTLS: First Trust Long/Short Equity ETF | 0.46 | +62.9% | 10.4% | 0.99 | 0 of 1 |
| EWP: iShares MSCI Spain ETF | 0.38 | +140% | 20.3% | 0.97 | 0 of 1 |
| [SMH](https://easycompare.io/research/smh): VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.42 | +323% | 36.9% | 0.97 | 0 of 1 |
| [GLD](https://easycompare.io/research/gld): SPDR Gold Shares | 0.10 | +126% | 18.9% | 0.96 | 0 of 1 |

## Common questions

### What was BNH's worst drawdown?

BNH's deepest decline since it began trading in 2020 was 37.0%, from October 2021 to May 2023. It has not yet climbed back to that peak. Because BNH launched in October 2020, that record does not include the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or six other sell-offs.

### What were BNH's best and worst years?

Over five full calendar years, BNH's best year was 2023, when it returned 19.3%. Its worst was 2022, with a return of -35.5%.

### Is there a better investment than BNH?

Among BNH's popular alternatives, PFF, BND and PGX earned more than BNH with less volatility over the past 5 years. PFF returned a loss of 0.2% a year at 10.5% volatility, against a loss of 4.7% a year at 19.8%. Looking beyond its popular alternatives, USHY (high yield bonds) and IBDT (investment grade bonds) earned more than BNH with less volatility over the past 5 years. USHY returned 3.6% a year at 7.4% volatility, against a loss of 4.7% a year at 19.8%.

### Is BNH more volatile than the S&P 500?

Yes. BNH's volatility over the past 5 years was 19.8%, 1.2 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, BNH's return lands within 19.8% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump.

### What is BNH's Sharpe ratio?

BNH's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was -0.14, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so BNH earned less for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings.

### How correlated is BNH with the S&P 500?

Over the past 5 years, BNH's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.56 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They often move together: some diversification next to an index fund, but not a cushion. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against BNH instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a BNH holding.

### What are the best alternatives to BNH?

Of the nine popular alternatives we compared, three outperformed BNH in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 2 long-term timeframes, with dividends reinvested: PFF, BIPH and BEPH.

### Did BNH outperform the S&P 500?

BNH finished ahead of the S&P 500 (SPY) in no of five full calendar years. In 2025, it returned +5.8%, against +17.7% for the index.

### How did BNH do in stock market crashes?

BNH fell less than the S&P 500 (SPY) in none of the two major crashes it has traded through, and further in two. The clearest case was the 2022 bear market, when BNH fell 31.7% and the S&P 500 fell 24.5%.

### What diversifies BNH?

These had a low correlation with BNH over the past 5 years and still earned a positive 5-year return: among large ETFs, LVHI (correlation 0.41), DXJ (correlation 0.28) and EMLP (correlation 0.34); among large stocks, CAH (correlation 0.13), CLS (correlation 0.23) and FIX (correlation 0.33). A correlation near zero means the two have moved largely independently.

## More research

- [Brookfield (BN) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/bn)
- [Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/bnd)
- [Brookfield Finance Inc. 4.50% P (BNJ) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/bnj)
- [Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/bam)
- [Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/schd)
- [NVIDIA (NVDA) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/nvda)
- [Apple (AAPL) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/aapl)
- [Alphabet (GOOG) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/goog)
- [Microsoft (MSFT) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/msft)
- [Amazon.com (AMZN) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/amzn)
- [Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/vti)
- [Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing (TSM) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/tsm)

## Explore further

- Full page with charts: https://easycompare.io/research/bnh
- All research pages: https://easycompare.io/llms.txt
- Compare the entire market against BNH live: https://betterthanspy.com/?b=BNH&utm_source=easycompare&utm_medium=research