# How ASE Technology Holding (ASX) compares with the whole market and its popular alternatives

> Source: EasyCompare research, https://easycompare.io/research/asx
> Data as of October 20, 2026. Total returns include reinvested dividends. Past performance does not predict future results; nothing here is investment advice.

Built by QuantCommons' quantitative engine, this page is about relative opportunity, not data on ASX alone. It places ASX (ASE Technology Holding Co., Ltd.) against 20+ popular alternatives, its neighboring categories and the entire market of over 10,000 U.S.-listed stocks and ETFs, and surfaces what has done better on consistent outperformance, return for the risk taken, behavior in real market crashes and diversification. The result is a clearer view of where ASX stands in the market, and of the alternatives worth a closer look.

Period covered: ASX's full trading record, from October 2000 through September 2026. The crash tests reach back to 2000 using older funds and the S&P 500. All returns include reinvested dividends. Data as of October 20, 2026.

## Key findings

- **Right now:** Over the past 6 months, ASX rose 40.6% against 9.1% for the S&P 500 and 11.2% for the Nasdaq 100. Its semiconductor peers split over the past 6 months: UMC (United Microelectronics) rose 58.4%, while GFS (GLOBALFOUNDRIES) fell 19.7%.
- **Stock or market?:** ASX held up far better than its industry: it rose 10.5% over the past 3 months while the semiconductors ETF SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) fell 2.2%. The S&P 500 rose 3.9%.
- **Past 1 to 3 years:** ASX has run far ahead of the market, rising 217% over the past year against 15.8% for the S&P 500 and 17.9% for the Nasdaq 100. The same gap shows up over 3 years (469% against 89.3%).
- **Long term:** ASX turned $10,000 into $107,000 over the past decade, against $42,100 in the S&P 500. ASX's 10-year return of 967% puts it ahead of 95% of the stocks worth at least $300 million with that much history. The S&P 500 returned 321%.
- **In a crash:** Across six sell-offs, ASX has typically fallen 1.4 times as far as the S&P 500. In the 2022 bear market, ASX fell 37.4%, against 24.5% for the S&P 500, and less than semiconductor peers such as TSM (Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing, 54.3%).
- **Diversification:** Against the S&P 500, ASX has a correlation of 0.56 over 5 years, more closely than 84% of stocks worth at least $300 million. Next to an index fund it is some diversification, but not a hedge. Over 10 years, ASX's beta versus the S&P 500 was 1.38: in the S&P 500's rising months it gained 1.3 times as much as the index, and in falling months it lost 79% as much.
- **Better options**
  - **Nearby categories and themes:** MU (Micron Technology, semiconductors) and DELL (Dell Technologies, computer hardware) were ahead of ASX in most short and long periods, though with much bigger swings (57.1% and 54.4% volatility against 43.0%).
  - **Whole market:** Few investments have done better on both counts: only four of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than ASX with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them PBR (Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. - Petrobras), PBR-A (Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. - Petrobras) and MPC (Marathon Petroleum).

## How much would $10,000 in ASX have grown?

This chart tracks a hypothetical $10,000 investment in ASX over the past 25 years, with dividends reinvested, alongside the same amount in the S&P 500, investments that ended ahead of ASX over the same span and ASX's popular alternatives, among those that traded for the entire period.

- $10,000 invested in ASX at the end of September 2001 would have grown to $415,507 by September 2026, more than the $114,557 it would have become in SPY, an S&P 500 fund.
- Six of the eight other investments on the chart ended ahead of ASX, and NVDA finished highest, at $10,952,339.

## ASX at a glance

This section summarizes the key facts about the stock, its returns over periods from one to ten years and the risk it has carried, with dividends reinvested throughout.

- ASX's deepest decline since it began trading in 2000 was 79.5%, from July 2007 to December 2008. It took about five years from the low to climb back to its old high.
- Over 25 full calendar years, ASX's best was 2009, when it returned 156%, and its worst was 2008, when it lost 63.2%. It lost money in nine of those years.
- ASX is 14.3% below its all-time high.

- Type: Stock, Technology (Semiconductors)
- Trading since: October 2, 2000
- Market value: $90B
- Volatility (5 years): 43.0%; Sharpe ratio: 1.15
- Worst decline ever: −79.5%, from July 19, 2007 to December 4, 2008; back at its high by May 22, 2014

| Period | ASX total return |
| --- | --- |
| 1 month | −6.8% |
| 3 months | +10.5% |
| 6 months | +40.6% |
| year to date | +144% |
| 1 year | +217% |
| 3 years | +469% |
| 5 years | +631% |
| 10 years | +967% |

## ASX against the whole market

Where ASX ranks among every stock and fund, and what across the market has done better.

### How does ASX rank among all stocks?

This section ranks ASX on return, volatility, risk-adjusted return and worst decline against every stock worth at least $300 million with enough history.

- ASX's 1-year return ranks in the top 1% of the 3,287 stocks worth at least $300 million with 1 year of history.

| Measure | ASX | Rank |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1-year return | +217% | 29 of 3,287 (top 1%) |
| 3-year return | +469% | 117 of 3,017 (top 4%) |
| 5-year return | +631% | 48 of 2,893 (top 2%) |
| 10-year return | +967% | 112 of 2,202 (top 6%) |
| Volatility, 5 years | 43.0% | 1,609 of 2,893 (top 56%) |
| Sharpe ratio, 5 years | 1.15 | 33 of 2,893 (top 2%) |
| Worst decline, past 10 years | −52.5% | 553 of 2,187 (top 26%) |

### What has beaten ASX on both return and risk?

Each dot is an investment, placed by how much it earned a year over the past 5 years (higher is better) and how much its price swung, its volatility (further left is calmer).

- Four stocks worth at least $500 million sit in the green region: each earned more than ASX over the past 5 years with smaller price swings. That is fewer than 1% of the 3,633 screened. Few investments beat it on both counts.
- Among those with at least half ASX's swings, MPC has the best return for its risk: 51.2% a year at 33.4% volatility, 22% less than ASX's 43.0%, and a Sharpe ratio (return above cash per unit of volatility) of 1.41 against 1.15 for ASX. INSW earned the most, 56.5% a year, while still swinging less than ASX (40.5% against 43.0%).

### Is there a better investment than ASX?

The table below lists investments that beat ASX over the past 5 years on at least one of these measures: a higher annual return with lower volatility, a higher annual return at similar volatility, a similar return with lower volatility, a higher Sharpe ratio with a smaller worst decline, a higher total return in most periods from 3 months to 10 years, or smaller losses in recent market crashes.

- Looking beyond its popular alternatives, MU (semiconductors) and DELL (computer hardware) were ahead of ASX in most short and long periods, though with much bigger swings (57.1% and 54.4% volatility against 43.0%).
- Few investments have done better on both counts: only four of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than ASX with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them PBR, PBR-A and MPC.

The 4 strongest of 4 investments that beat ASX over the past 5 years, out of 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million.

| Investment | Group | Annual return (5 years) | Volatility | Sharpe | Worst decline (10 years) | 10Y return | Correlation with ASX | Better on |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| ASX: ASE Technology Holding Co., Ltd. (this page) |  | +48.8% | 43.0% | 1.15 | −52.5% | +967% |  |  |
| [MPC](https://easycompare.io/research/mpc): Marathon Petroleum Corporation | Oil & Gas | +51.2% | 33.4% | 1.41 | −79.7% | +1,387% | 0.13 | Higher return, lower volatility; Higher return in most periods |
| [PBR-A](https://easycompare.io/research/pbr-a): Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. - Petrobras | Integrated Oil & Gas | +51.8% | 37.5% | 1.31 | −71.7% | +768% | 0.02 | Higher return, lower volatility |
| [PBR](https://easycompare.io/research/pbr): Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. - Petrobras | Integrated Oil & Gas | +50.3% | 37.5% | 1.28 | −75.3% | +674% | -0.02 | Higher return, lower volatility |
| INSW: International Seaways, Inc. | Oil & Gas | +56.5% | 40.5% | 1.31 | −57.4% | — | 0.13 | Higher return, lower volatility |

## ASX against its popular alternatives

The investments people most often weigh against ASX, compared period by period and year by year.

### How do ASX's risk and return compare with its alternatives?

This map plots each investment's annual return over the past 5 years against its volatility, the size of its typical price swings.

- None of the 19 popular alternatives earned more than ASX over the past 5 years with smaller price swings, so every higher return on the map came with a bumpier ride.
- 17 of the 19 popular alternatives earned less than ASX over the past 5 years while swinging more, the weaker corner of the map.
- Over the past 5 years, ASX returned 48.9% a year, more than the S&P 500's 12.7%, with higher volatility (43.0% against 17.1%).

### Has ASX consistently beaten its popular alternatives?

This section compares ASX with the investments people most often weigh against it, checking each one over eight periods from one month to ten years.

- None of the 20 popular alternatives outperformed ASX in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes. The closest was NVDA.

| Investment | 1Y return | 3Y return | 5Y return | 10Y return | Periods ahead of ASX | Verdict | Sharpe |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| ASX: ASE Technology Holding Co., Ltd. (this page) | +217% | +469% | +631% | +967% |  |  | 1.15 |
| [NVDA](https://easycompare.io/research/nvda): NVIDIA Corporation | +18.8% | +425% | +884% | +13,019% | 1/5 short-term, 2/3 long-term |  | 1.14 |
| [UMC](https://easycompare.io/research/umc): United Microelectronics Corporation | +166% | +202% | +147% | +1,610% | 2/5 short-term, 1/3 long-term |  | 0.63 |
| [AMD](https://easycompare.io/research/amd): Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. | +122% | +425% | +359% | +7,583% | 1/5 short-term, 1/3 long-term |  | 0.82 |
| [TSM](https://easycompare.io/research/tsm): Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited | +44.3% | +382% | +293% | +1,505% | 1/5 short-term, 1/3 long-term |  | 0.91 |
| CAMT: Camtek Ltd. | +4.1% | +149% | +231% | +4,551% | 0/5 short-term, 1/3 long-term |  | 0.70 |
| [LRCX](https://easycompare.io/research/lrcx): Lam Research Corporation | +83.7% | +350% | +390% | +2,989% | 0/5 short-term, 1/3 long-term |  | 0.89 |
| [AVGO](https://easycompare.io/research/avgo): Broadcom Inc. | −3.5% | +305% | +617% | +2,380% | 0/5 short-term, 1/3 long-term |  | 1.11 |
| [AMAT](https://easycompare.io/research/amat): Applied Materials, Inc. | +78.5% | +209% | +215% | +1,488% | 0/5 short-term, 1/3 long-term |  | 0.72 |
| ONTO: Onto Innovation Inc. | +61.9% | +86.2% | +200% | +1,005% | 0/5 short-term, 1/3 long-term |  | 0.67 |
| KLIC: Kulicke and Soffa Industries, Inc. | +106% | +95.7% | +64.1% | +598% | 1/5 short-term, 0/3 long-term |  | 0.45 |
| MTSI: MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. | +87.4% | +249% | +302% | +588% | 1/5 short-term, 0/3 long-term |  | 0.83 |
| SIMO: Silicon Motion Technology Corporation | +125% | +320% | +243% | +494% | 1/5 short-term, 0/3 long-term |  | 0.71 |
| IMOS: ChipMOS TECHNOLOGIES Inc. | +192% | +172% | +128% | +366% | 1/5 short-term, 0/3 long-term |  | 0.58 |
| GFS: GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. | +32.7% | −13.2% | — | — | 1/5 short-term, 0/3 long-term |  | — |
| FORM: FormFactor, Inc. | +144% | +227% | +201% | +964% | 0/5 short-term, 0/3 long-term |  | 0.67 |
| COHU: Cohu, Inc. | +132% | +61.0% | +68.5% | +406% | 0/5 short-term, 0/3 long-term |  | 0.46 |
| AMKR: Amkor Technology, Inc. | +30.1% | +97.6% | +93.5% | +363% | 0/5 short-term, 0/3 long-term |  | 0.52 |
| [INTC](https://easycompare.io/research/intc): Intel Corp. | +141% | +167% | +79.8% | +219% | 0/5 short-term, 0/3 long-term |  | 0.49 |
| HIMX: Himax Technologies, Inc. | +26.6% | +135% | +51.0% | +105% | 0/5 short-term, 0/3 long-term |  | 0.44 |
| ACMR: ACM Research, Inc. | +38.1% | +208% | +54.8% | — | 0/5 short-term, 0/3 long-term |  | 0.51 |

### How did ASX do year by year?

This table shows each investment's total return in every full calendar year since 2001, along with where ASX ranked among its popular alternatives each year.

- Among its popular alternatives, AVGO came out ahead of ASX most often, in 13 of the 16 years both traded.
- ASX finished ahead of the S&P 500 in 13 of its 25 full calendar years.
- Ranked against its popular alternatives each year, ASX finished in the top quarter in four of 25 years and in the bottom quarter in three. In 2025, it ranked 6 of 21.

| Year | ASX | SPY |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2025 | +65.7% | +17.7% |
| 2024 | +10.1% | +24.9% |
| 2023 | +60.7% | +26.2% |
| 2022 | −13.0% | −18.2% |
| 2021 | +38.3% | +28.7% |
| 2020 | +8.1% | +18.3% |
| 2019 | +53.7% | +31.2% |
| 2018 | −37.2% | −4.6% |
| 2017 | +33.6% | +21.7% |
| 2016 | −7.4% | +12.0% |

## Risk and diversification

How ASX has fallen, how it held up in crashes beside the S&P 500 and its popular alternatives, and what moves independently of it.

### What were ASX's worst declines?

A drawdown is the decline from a peak to the lowest point before a new high.

- In all five of ASX's worst declines, the S&P 500 held up better over the same dates.
- The slowest recovery came after ASX fell 79.5% from July 2007 to December 2008; it did not regain that peak until May 2014, five years later.

| Decline | Peak | Low | Back at the high | SPY over the same dates | Market event |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| −79.5% | July 19, 2007 | December 4, 2008 | May 22, 2014 | −43.6% | 2008 financial crisis |
| −74.5% | October 24, 2000 | March 6, 2003 | June 15, 2007 | −38.8% | dot-com bust |
| −52.5% | April 16, 2018 | March 23, 2020 | January 11, 2021 | −13.3% | late-2018 sell-off |
| −46.1% | August 5, 2021 | October 11, 2022 | June 7, 2023 | −17.5% | 2022 bear market |
| −40.6% | July 11, 2024 | April 8, 2025 | October 16, 2025 | −9.9% |  |

### How did ASX do in stock market crashes?

This section measures how far ASX, the S&P 500 and each alternative fell from peak to trough during every major market crash since 2000.

- ASX fell further than the S&P 500 in eight of the nine crashes it has traded through. The clearest case was the 2008 financial crisis, when ASX fell 75.3% and the S&P 500 fell 55.2%.
- Among its popular alternatives, UMC held up best, falling less than ASX in six of the nine crashes they both traded through.
- ASX began trading after the dot-com bust, but ten of its popular alternatives lived through it. The mildest fall among them was AMAT's 82.0%, against 47.5% for the S&P 500.

| Crash | Dates | ASX fall | SPY fall |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Dot-com bust | March 10, 2000 to October 9, 2002 | not trading | −47.5% |
| Global financial crisis | October 9, 2007 to March 9, 2009 | −75.3% | −55.2% |
| Flash crash | May 6, 2010 to May 7, 2010 | 0.0% | −1.5% |
| Euro debt crisis | July 22, 2011 to October 3, 2011 | −26.2% | −17.9% |
| China devaluation & oil rout | August 10, 2015 to February 11, 2016 | −19.3% | −12.8% |
| Volmageddon | February 2, 2018 to February 9, 2018 | −8.0% | −6.5% |
| Q4 2018 selloff | September 21, 2018 to December 24, 2018 | −25.1% | −19.3% |
| COVID crash | February 19, 2020 to March 23, 2020 | −36.5% | −33.7% |
| 2022 bear market | January 4, 2022 to October 12, 2022 | −37.4% | −24.5% |
| SVB / regional bank stress | March 8, 2023 to March 13, 2023 | −4.7% | −3.4% |

### How closely does ASX move with the S&P 500?

Upside capture measures how much of the S&P 500's gains an investment kept in the months the market rose, and downside capture how much of its losses it took in the months the market fell.

- Over the past 10 years, ASX captured 126% of the S&P 500's gains in rising months and 79% of its losses in falling months, with a beta of 1.38. Its share of the market's gains was larger than its share of the losses.
- UMC took just 52% of the S&P 500's losses, against 79% for ASX, while still keeping 133% of its gains.
- Seven of the 18 popular alternatives had a higher capture ratio (upside capture divided by downside capture) than ASX's 1.59, led by UMC, CAMT and AVGO.

Measured over the past 10 years of monthly returns against SPY.

| Investment | Upside capture | Downside capture | Beta |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| ASX: ASE Technology Holding Co., Ltd. (this page) | 126% | 79.0% | 1.38 |
| [NVDA](https://easycompare.io/research/nvda): NVIDIA Corporation | 248% | 140% | 1.83 |
| [UMC](https://easycompare.io/research/umc): United Microelectronics Corporation | 133% | 52.0% | 1.33 |
| [AMD](https://easycompare.io/research/amd): Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. | 254% | 179% | 2.25 |
| [TSM](https://easycompare.io/research/tsm): Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited | 138% | 75.0% | 1.15 |
| CAMT: Camtek Ltd. | 191% | 96.0% | 1.60 |
| [LRCX](https://easycompare.io/research/lrcx): Lam Research Corporation | 183% | 104% | 1.56 |
| [AVGO](https://easycompare.io/research/avgo): Broadcom Inc. | 158% | 86.0% | 1.19 |
| [AMAT](https://easycompare.io/research/amat): Applied Materials, Inc. | 152% | 97.0% | 1.51 |
| ONTO: Onto Innovation Inc. | 139% | 92.0% | 1.41 |
| KLIC: Kulicke and Soffa Industries, Inc. | 131% | 111% | 1.44 |
| MTSI: MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. | 148% | 157% | 1.93 |
| SIMO: Silicon Motion Technology Corporation | 126% | 116% | 1.41 |
| IMOS: ChipMOS TECHNOLOGIES Inc. | 117% | 113% | 1.07 |
| FORM: FormFactor, Inc. | 132% | 81.0% | 1.29 |
| COHU: Cohu, Inc. | 122% | 116% | 1.65 |
| AMKR: Amkor Technology, Inc. | 152% | 174% | 1.94 |
| [INTC](https://easycompare.io/research/intc): Intel Corp. | 98.0% | 100% | 1.43 |
| HIMX: Himax Technologies, Inc. | 133% | 197% | 2.12 |

### What diversifies ASX?

Correlation measures how closely two investments move together, on a scale from 1 (in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to -1 (in opposite directions).

- Moving a fifth of the money in ASX into MCK would have cut the portfolio's volatility by 19% over the past 5 years while keeping its annual return (+47.9% for ASX alone, +47.9% for the mix).
- Among large ETFs, LVHI, GCOW and EMLP have moved largely independently of ASX over the past 5 years, with correlations of 0.32 or lower, and each still earned a positive 5-year return.
- FIX made money in six of the nine calendar years in which ASX lost money.

| Investment | Correlation with ASX | 5Y return | Volatility | Sharpe | Rose in ASX's 9 down years |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| LVHI: Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 0.32 | +119% | 11.1% | 1.48 | 1 of 9 |
| GCOW: Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF | 0.27 | +93.4% | 13.6% | 1.04 | 1 of 9 |
| EMLP: First Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund | 0.21 | +101% | 14.5% | 1.04 | 2 of 9 |
| FJUN: FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - June | 0.47 | +65.4% | 10.6% | 1.01 | 0 of 9 |
| HDV: iShares Core High Dividend ETF | 0.19 | +83.3% | 13.0% | 1.00 | 2 of 9 |
| FTLS: First Trust Long/Short Equity ETF | 0.48 | +62.9% | 10.4% | 0.99 | 2 of 9 |
| [GLD](https://easycompare.io/research/gld): SPDR Gold Shares | 0.13 | +126% | 18.9% | 0.96 | 4 of 9 |
| [XLE](https://easycompare.io/research/xle): State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | -0.01 | +177% | 25.5% | 0.93 | 5 of 9 |

## Common questions

### What was ASX's worst drawdown?

ASX's deepest decline since it began trading in 2000 was 79.5%, from July 2007 to December 2008. It took about five years from the low to climb back to its old high.

### What were ASX's best and worst years?

Over 25 full calendar years, ASX's best year was 2009, when it returned 156%. Its worst was 2008, with a return of -63.2%.

### Is there a better investment than ASX?

Looking beyond its popular alternatives, MU (semiconductors) and DELL (computer hardware) were ahead of ASX in most short and long periods, though with much bigger swings (57.1% and 54.4% volatility against 43.0%). Few investments have done better on both counts: only four of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than ASX with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them PBR, PBR-A and MPC.

### Is ASX more volatile than the S&P 500?

Yes. ASX's volatility over the past 5 years was 43.0%, 2.5 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, ASX's return lands within 43.0% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump.

### What is ASX's Sharpe ratio?

ASX's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 1.15, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so ASX earned more for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings.

### How correlated is ASX with the S&P 500?

Over the past 5 years, ASX's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.56 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They often move together: some diversification next to an index fund, but not a cushion. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against ASX instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a ASX holding.

### What are the best alternatives to ASX?

None of the 20 popular alternatives we compared outperformed ASX in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes, which says more about ASX's strength than about its alternatives.

### Did ASX outperform the S&P 500?

ASX finished ahead of the S&P 500 (SPY) in 13 of 25 full calendar years. In 2025, it returned +65.7%, against +17.7% for the index.

### How did ASX do in stock market crashes?

ASX fell less than the S&P 500 (SPY) in one of the nine major crashes it has traded through, and further in eight. The clearest case was the 2008 financial crisis, when ASX fell 75.3% and the S&P 500 fell 55.2%.

### What diversifies ASX?

These had a low correlation with ASX over the past 5 years and still earned a positive 5-year return: among large ETFs, LVHI (correlation 0.32), GCOW (correlation 0.27) and EMLP (correlation 0.21); among large stocks, CAH (correlation 0.26), CLS (correlation 0.42) and FIX (correlation 0.40). A correlation near zero means the two have moved largely independently.

## More research

- [NVIDIA (NVDA) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/nvda)
- [United Microelectronics (UMC) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/umc)
- [Advanced Micro Devices (AMD) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/amd)
- [Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing (TSM) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/tsm)
- [Lam Research (LRCX) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/lrcx)
- [Broadcom (AVGO) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/avgo)
- [Applied Materials (AMAT) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/amat)
- [Intel (INTC) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/intc)
- [Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/schd)
- [Apple (AAPL) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/aapl)
- [Alphabet (GOOG) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/goog)
- [Microsoft (MSFT) Performance, Alternatives and Market Rank](https://easycompare.io/research/msft)

## Explore further

- Full page with charts: https://easycompare.io/research/asx
- All research pages: https://easycompare.io/llms.txt
- Compare the entire market against ASX live: https://betterthanspy.com/?b=ASX&utm_source=easycompare&utm_medium=research